Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Probióticos para el tratamiento del eccema

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006135.pub2Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 08 octubre 2008see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Piel

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2010 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Robert John Boyle

    Correspondencia a: Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Australia

    [email protected]

    [email protected]

  • Fiona J Bath‐Hextall

    School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK

  • Jo Leonardi‐Bee

    Division of Epidemiology and Public Health, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK

  • Dedee F Murrell

    Department of Dermatology, St George Hospital, Sydney, Australia

  • Mimi LK Tang

    Immunology, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Australia

Contributions of authors

Link with editorial base and co‐ordinate contributions from co‐reviewers (RB)
Draft protocol (RB with contributions from all co‐reviewers)
Run search (RB)
Identify relevant titles and abstracts from searches (RB, MT)
Obtain copies of trials (RB)
Selection of trials (RB, MT)
Extract data from trials (RB, FB)
Enter data into RevMan (RB, FB)
Carry out analysis (RB, JL)
Interpret data (RB, MT, DM, FB)
Draft final review (RB, with contributions from all co‐reviewers)
Update review (RB)

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Australia.

  • University of Melbourne, Australia.

  • Royal Children's Hospital, Australia.

  • Department of Paediatrics, Imperial College, London, UK.

External sources

  • No sources of support supplied

Declaraciones de interés

disponible en

Ninguno conocido.

Agradecimientos

disponible en

Se dan las gracias a Judy Taylor y George Varigos por sus contribuciones en la redacción del protocolo para esta revisión.

El Grupo Cochrane de la Piel (Cochrane Skin Group) agradece a Claudia Gore, Nerys Roberts y John Sinn (expertos de contenido externos), Shirley Manknell y Sharon Gudu (consumidores que actuaron como evaluadores externos). Los autores agradecen al Australasian Cochrane Centre la experiencia y asesoramiento con respecto a la compleción de esta revisión y a Damian Jolly el asesoramiento estadístico.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2018 Nov 21

Probiotics for treating eczema

Review

Areti Makrgeorgou, Jo Leonardi‐Bee, Fiona J Bath‐Hextall, Dedee F Murrell, Mimi LK Tang, Amanda Roberts, Robert J Boyle

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006135.pub3

2008 Oct 08

Probiotics for treating eczema

Review

Robert John Boyle, Fiona J Bath‐Hextall, Jo Leonardi‐Bee, Dedee F Murrell, Mimi LK Tang

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006135.pub2

2006 Jul 19

Probiotics for atopic eczema

Protocol

Robert John Boyle, Fiona J Bath‐Hextall, S Donath, Dedee F Murrell, Mimi LK Tang, Judy Taylor, George Varigos

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006135

Differences between protocol and review

We changed the title which was Probiotics for atopic eczema in the protocol to Probiotics for treating eczema on the advice of the referees.

We have made small changes to the Background on the advice of the referees.

We made small changes to the 'Criteria for considering studies for the review' to clarify issues

Data extraction was completed by RB and FB in the review, in place of RB and MT in the protocol due to time availability.

Dichotomous outcome data have been reported as OR in the review, and RR were planned in the protocol. This was due to the inclusion of a cross‐over trial in the review. It is not possible to pool the data from cross‐over and parallel group trials using the inverse generic variance method with RR, therefore OR have been used throughout this review to maximise the available data for meta‐analyses, and for consistency of interpretation.

Finally an extra subgroup analysis was undertaken in the review which had not been specified in the protocol ‐ outcome data were analysed according to the probiotic strain used Analysis 1.13. This analysis was undertaken due the unexplained heterogeneity between studies for primary and secondary outcomes, and the use of the same probiotic strain in several studies. As discussed above, conclusions from this analysis must be guarded due to its post‐hoc nature.

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.