Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

The effectiveness and cost‐effectiveness of inpatient specialist palliative care in acute hospitals for adults with advanced illness and their caregivers

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012780Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 02 septiembre 2017see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Protocol
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Dolor y cuidados paliativos

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2017 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Sabrina Bajwah

    Correspondencia a: Department of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Cicely Saunders Institute, King's College London, London, UK

    [email protected]

  • Deokhee Yi

    Department of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Cicely Saunders Institute, King's College London, London, UK

  • Gunn Grande

    School of Health Sciences, and Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

  • Chris Todd

    School of Health Sciences, and Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

  • Massimo Costantini

    Palliative Care Unit, IRCCS Arcispedale S. Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia, Italy

  • Fliss E Murtagh

    Department of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Cicely Saunders Institute, King's College London, London, UK

  • Catherine J Evans

    Department of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Cicely Saunders Institute, King's College London, London, UK

  • Irene J Higginson

    Department of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Cicely Saunders Institute, King's College London, London, UK

Contributions of authors

SB, CJE, and IJH developed and wrote the current protocol which is built upon previous palliative care Cochrane Reviews.

DY, GG, CT, FEM, and MC discussed the protocol and contributed to its development along with the other members of the review team.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • Department of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Cicely Saunders Institute, King's College London, London, UK.

  • Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK.

External sources

  • School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

  • Amsterdam Institute of Social Science Research, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

  • Regional Palliative Care Network, IRCCS AOU San Martino‐IST, Genoa, Italy.

  • National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), UK.

    Earlier drafts of this review were completed by the MORECare project, which was funded by the NIHR and managed by the Medical Research Council as part of the Methodology Research Programme (project number: G0802654/1).

  • The Atlantic Philanthropies and Cicely Saunders International, Other.

    The review was finalised through support from The Atlantic Philanthropies and Cicely Saunders International

  • NIHR Health Services and Delivery Research (HS&DR), UK.

    Ongoing work for this project has been funded by NIHR HS&DR Project number: 16/02/17

Declarations of interest

SB: none known; SB is a Consultant in Palliative Medicine and manages patients with advanced life‐threatening illness.

DY: none known.

GG: none known.

CT: none known.

MC: none known.

FEM: none known; FEM is a Consultant in Palliative Medicine and manages patients with advanced life‐threatening illness.

CJE: none known; CJE is an Honorary Nurse Consultant and manages patients with advanced life‐threatening illness.

IJH: none known; IJH is a Consultant in Palliative Medicine and manages patients with advanced life‐threatening illness.

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge Barbara Daveson, Melinda Smith, Hamid Benalia, Emily West, Sue Hall, Barbara Gomes and Nancy Preston who contributed to earlier drafts of this protocol.

BuildCARE members: Emma Bennett, Francesca Cooper, Barbara Daveson, Susanne de Wolf‐Linder, Mendwas Dzingina, Clare Ellis‐Smith, Catherine Evans, Taja Ferguson, Lesley Henson, Irene Higginson, Bridget Johnston, Pauline Kane, Peter Lawlor, Paul McCrone, Regina McQuillan, Diane Meier, Sean Morrison, Fliss Murtagh, Charles Normand, Steve Pantilat, Ana Reison, Karen Ryan, Lucy Selman, Melinda Smith, Katy Tobin, Rowena Vohora and Gao Wei.

Cochrane Review Group funding acknowledgement: this project was supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), via Cochrane Infrastructure funding to the Cochrane Pain, Palliative and Supportive Care Review Group (PaPaS). The views and opinions expressed therein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Systematic Reviews Programme, the NIHR, the NHS or the Department of Health.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2020 Sep 30

The effectiveness and cost‐effectiveness of hospital‐based specialist palliative care for adults with advanced illness and their caregivers

Review

Sabrina Bajwah, Adejoke O Oluyase, Deokhee Yi, Wei Gao, Catherine J Evans, Gunn Grande, Chris Todd, Massimo Costantini, Fliss E Murtagh, Irene J Higginson

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012780.pub2

2017 Sep 02

The effectiveness and cost‐effectiveness of inpatient specialist palliative care in acute hospitals for adults with advanced illness and their caregivers

Protocol

Sabrina Bajwah, Deokhee Yi, Gunn Grande, Chris Todd, Massimo Costantini, Fliss E Murtagh, Catherine J Evans, Irene J Higginson

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012780

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.