Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Intravenous iron versus oral iron versus no iron with or without erythropoiesis‐ stimulating agents (ESA) for cancer patients with anaemia: A systematic review and network meta‐analysis

Esta versión no es la más reciente

ver la versión actual 20 junio 2022

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012633Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 16 abril 2017see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Protocol
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:

  1. Grupo Cochrane de Hematología

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2017 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Aaron Weigl

    Correspondencia a: Cochrane Haematological Malignancies Group, Department I of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany

    [email protected]

  • Nicola Köhler

    Cochrane Haematological Malignancies Group, Department I of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany

  • Ina Monsef

    Cochrane Haematological Malignancies Group, Department I of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany

  • Julia Bohlius

    Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland

  • Kathrin Kuhr

    Institute of Medical Statistics, Informatics and Epidemiology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany

  • Ingrid Becker

    Institute of Medical Statistics, Informatics and Epidemiology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany

  • Nicole Skoetz

    Cochrane Haematological Malignancies Group, Department I of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany

Contributions of authors

Aaron Weigl: Protocol development

Nicola Köhler: Protocol development

Ina Monsef: Search strategy

Julia Bohlius: Methodological expertise

Kathrin Kuhr: Statistical evaluation

Ingrid Becker: Statistical evaluation

Nicole Skoetz: Protocol development, methodological expertise

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • No sources of support supplied

External sources

  • Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Germany.

    Funding number 01KG1405

Declarations of interest

Aaron Weigl: The grant by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Germany, does not lead to a conflict of interest.

Nicola Köhler: The grant by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Germany, does not lead to a conflict of interest.

Ina Monsef: None known

Julia Bohlius: None known

Kathrin Kuhr: The grant by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Germany, does not lead to a conflict of interest.

Ingrid Becker: The grant by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Germany, does not lead to a conflict of interest.

Nicole Skoetz: The grant by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Germany, does not lead to a conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the following members of the Cochrane Haematological Malignancies Group (CHMG) for their comments and improving the review: Dr Guido Schwarzer, Prof. Benjamin Djulbegovic, Prof. Rahul Mhaskar and the consumer eidotr Anne Lyddiatt.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2022 Jun 20

Intravenous iron versus oral iron versus no iron with or without erythropoiesis‐ stimulating agents (ESA) for cancer patients with anaemia: a systematic review and network meta‐analysis

Review

Anne Adams, Benjamin Scheckel, Anissa Habsaoui, Madhuri Haque, Kathrin Kuhr, Ina Monsef, Julia Bohlius, Nicole Skoetz

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012633.pub2

2017 Apr 16

Intravenous iron versus oral iron versus no iron with or without erythropoiesis‐ stimulating agents (ESA) for cancer patients with anaemia: A systematic review and network meta‐analysis

Protocol

Aaron Weigl, Nicola Köhler, Ina Monsef, Julia Bohlius, Kathrin Kuhr, Ingrid Becker, Nicole Skoetz

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012633

Notes

Some passages in the protocol and review, especially in the methods part, are from the standard template of CHMG

Keywords

MeSH

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) Keywords

Medical Subject Headings Check Words

Humans;

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.

original image
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1
Ir a la figura del protocoloAbrir en una pestaña nueva