Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Agentes inotrópicos y estrategias vasodilatadoras para el tratamiento del shock cardiogénico o síndrome de gasto cardíaco bajo

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Appendices

Appendix 1. Search strategy

CENTRAL

#1 MeSH descriptor: [Shock, Cardiogenic] this term only

#2 (cardiogenic* shock)

#3 MeSH descriptor: [Cardiac Output, Low] this term only

#4 (low near/2 cardiac output)

#5 ((instab* or unstab*) next h?emodynamic)

#6 #1 or #2 or #3 or #4 or #5

#7 MeSH descriptor: [Drug Therapy] this term only

#8 ((drug or medica* or pharmacological) next (therap* or treatment))

#9 MeSH descriptor: [Drug Administration Routes] explode all trees

#10 drug administ*

#11 MeSH descriptor: [Drug Administration Schedule] this term only

#12 #7 or #8 or #9 or #10 or #11

#13 MeSH descriptor: [Cardiotonic Agents] explode all trees

#14 cardiotonic

#15 ((myocardial or cardiac) next stimula*)

#16 inotrope*

#17 inotropic agent*

#18 cardioprotective agent*

#19 acetyldigitoxin*

#20 acetyldigoxin*

#21 adrenomedullin

#22 amrinone

#23 carbachol

#24 cardiac glycoside*

#25 cymarine

#26 deslanoside

#27 digitalis glycoside*

#28 digitoxin

#29 digoxin

#30 dobutamine

#31 dopamine

#32 enoximone

#33 etilefrine

#34 isoproterenol

#35 lisinopril

#36 medigoxin

#37 milrinone

#38 ouabain

#39 oxyfedrine

#40 phenylephrine

#41 prenalterol

#42 proscillaridin

#43 strophanthin*

#44 #13 or #14 or #15 or #16 or #17 or #18 or #19 or #20 or #21 or #22 or #23 or #24 or #25 or #26 or #27 or #28 or #29 or #30 or #31 or #32 or #33 or #34 or #35 or #36 or #37 or #38 or #39 or #40 or #41 or #42 or #43

#45 MeSH descriptor: [Vasodilator Agents] explode all trees

#46 vasodilators

#47 vasodilator drug*

#48 vasodilator agent*

#49 vasorelaxant*

#50 vasoactive antagonist*

#51 acetylcholine

#52 adenosine*

#53 adrenomedullin

#54 alprostadil

#55 amlodipine

#56 amyl nitrite

#57 bencyclane

#58 bepridil

#59 betahistine

#60 bradykinin

#61 celiprolol

#62 chromonar

#63 cromakalim

#64 cyclandelate

#65 diazoxide

#66 dihydroergocristine

#67 dihydroergocryptine

#68 dilazep

#69 diltiazem

#70 dipyridamole

#71 dyphylline

#72 ergoloid mesylate*

#73 erythrityl tetranitrate

#74 felodipine

#75 fenoldopam

#76 flunarizine

#77 hexobendine

#78 hydralazine

#79 iloprost

#80 isosorbide dinitrate

#81 isoxsuprine

#82 isradipine

#83 kallidin

#84 lidoflazine

#85 mibefradil

#86 minoxidil

#87 molsidomine

#88 moxisylyte

#89 nafronyl

#90 niacin

#91 nicardipine

#92 nicergoline

#93 nicorandil

#94 nicotinyl alcohol

#95 nifedipine

#96 nimodipine

#97 nisoldipine

#98 nitrendipine

#99 nitroglycerin

#100 nitroprusside

#101 nonachlazine

#102 nylidrin

#103 oxprenolol

#104 oxyfedrine

#105 papaverine

#106 pentaerythritol tetranitrate

#107 pentoxifylline

#108 phenoxybenzamine

#109 pinacidil

#110 pindolol

#111 (Pituitary Adenylate Cyclase‐Activating Polypeptide)

#112 prenylamine

#113 propranolol

#114 (S‐Nitroso‐N‐Acetylpenicillamine)

#115 S‐Nitrosoglutathione

#116 S‐Nitrosothiols

#117 Suloctidil

#118 Theobromine

#119 Tolazoline

#120 Trapidil

#121 (Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide)

#122 Verapamil

#123 Vincamine

#124 (Xanthinol Niacinate)

#125 #45 or #46 or #47 or #48 or #49 or #50 or #51 or #52 or #53 or #54 or #55 or #56 or #57 or #58 or #59 or #60 or #61 or #62 or #63 or #64 or #65 or #66 or #67 or #68 or #69 or #70 or #71 or #72 or #73 or #74 or #75 or #76 or #77 or #78 or #79 or #80 or #81 or #82 or #83 or #84 or #85 or #86 or #87 or #88 or #89 or #90 or #91 or #92 or #93 or #94 or #95 or #96 or #97 or #98 or #99 or #100 or #101 or #102 or #103 or #104 or #105 or #106 or #107 or #108 or #109 or #110 or #111 or #112 or #113 or #114 or #115 or #116 or #117 or #118 or #119 or #120 or #121 or #122 or #123 or #124

#126 MeSH descriptor: [Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors] explode all trees

#127 Epoprostenol

#128 Ketanserin

#129 #126 or #127 or #128

#130 MeSH descriptor: [Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors] this term only

#131 ((phosphodiesterase2 or phosphodiesterase‐2 or phosphodiesteraseII or "phosphodiesterase‐II") next (antagonist*))

#132 ((phosphodiesterase2 or phosphodiesterase‐2 or phosphodiesteraseII or phosphodiesterase‐II) next (inhibitor*))

#133 antiphosphodiesterase*

#134 Caffeine

#135 "calcium sensitiser*"

#136 Levosimendan

#137 #130 or #131 or #132 or #133 or #134 or #135 or #136

#138 tilarginine

#139 #12 or #44 or #125 or #129 or #137 or #138

#140 #6 and #139

MEDLINE Ovid

1. Shock, Cardiogenic/

2. cardiogenic* shock*.tw.

3. Cardiac Output, Low/

4. (low adj2 cardiac output).tw.

5. ((instab* or unstab*) adj h?emodynamic*).tw.

6. or/1‐5

7. Drug Therapy/

8. ((drug or medica* or pharmacological) adj (therap* or treatment)).tw.

9. exp Drug Administration Routes/

10. drug administ*.tw.

11. Drug Administration Schedule/

12. or/7‐11

13. exp Cardiotonic Agents/

14. cardiotonic.tw.

15. ((myocardial or cardiac) adj stimula*).tw.

16. inotrope*.tw.

17. inotropic agent*.tw.

18. cardioprotective agent*.tw.

19. acetyldigitoxin*.tw.

20. acetyldigoxin*.tw.

21. adrenomedullin.tw.

22. amrinone.tw.

23. carbachol.tw.

24. cardiac glycoside*.tw.

25. cymarine.tw.

26. deslanoside.tw.

27. digitalis glycoside*.tw.

28. digitoxin.tw.

29. digoxin.tw.

30. dobutamine.tw.

31. dopamine.tw.

32. enoximone.tw.

33. etilefrine.tw.

34. isoproterenol.tw.

35. lisinopril.tw.

36. medigoxin.tw.

37. milrinone.tw.

38. ouabain.tw.

39. oxyfedrine.tw.

40. phenylephrine.tw.

41. prenalterol.tw.

42. proscillaridin.tw.

43. strophanthin*.tw.

44. or/13‐43

45. exp Vasodilator Agents/

46. vasodilators.tw.

47. vasodilator drug*.tw.

48. vasodilator agent*.tw.

49. vasorelaxant*.tw.

50. vasoactive antagonist*.tw.

51. acetylcholine.tw.

52. adenosine*.tw.

53. adrenomedullin.tw.

54. alprostadil.tw.

55. amlodipine.tw.

56. amyl nitrite.tw.

57. bencyclane.tw.

58. bepridil.tw.

59. betahistine.tw.

60. bradykinin.tw.

61. celiprolol.tw.

62. chromonar.tw.

63. cromakalim.tw.

64. cyclandelate.tw.

65. diazoxide.tw.

66. dihydroergocristine.tw.

67. dihydroergocryptine.tw.

68. dilazep.tw.

69. diltiazem.tw.

70. dipyridamole.tw.

71. dyphylline.tw.

72. ergoloid mesylate*.tw.

73. erythrityl tetranitrate.tw.

74. felodipine.tw.

75. fenoldopam.tw.

76. flunarizine.tw.

77. hexobendine.tw.

78. hydralazine.tw.

79. iloprost.tw.

80. isosorbide dinitrate.tw.

81. isoxsuprine.tw.

82. isradipine.tw.

83. kallidin.tw.

84. lidoflazine.tw.

85. mibefradil.tw.

86. minoxidil.tw.

87. molsidomine.tw.

88. moxisylyte.tw.

89. nafronyl.tw.

90. niacin.tw.

91. nicardipine.tw.

92. nicergoline.tw.

93. nicorandil.tw.

94. nicotinyl alcohol.tw.

95. nifedipine.tw.

96. nimodipine.tw.

97. nisoldipine.tw.

98. nitrendipine.tw.

99. nitroglycerin.tw.

100. nitroprusside.tw.

101. nonachlazine.tw.

102. nylidrin.tw.

103. oxprenolol.tw.

104. oxyfedrine.tw.

105. papaverine.tw.

106. pentaerythritol tetranitrate.tw.

107. pentoxifylline.tw.

108. phenoxybenzamine.tw.

109. pinacidil.tw.

110. pindolol.tw.

111. Pituitary Adenylate Cyclase‐Activating Polypeptide.tw.

112. prenylamine.tw.

113. propranolol.tw.

114. S‐Nitroso‐N‐Acetylpenicillamine.tw.

115. S‐Nitrosoglutathione.tw.

116. S‐Nitrosothiols.tw.

117. Suloctidil.tw.

118. Theobromine.tw.

119. Tolazoline.tw.

120. Trapidil.tw.

121. Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide.tw.

122. Verapamil.tw.

123. Vincamine.tw.

124. Xanthinol Niacinate.tw.

125. or/45‐124

126. exp Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/

127. Epoprostenol.tw.

128. Ketanserin.tw.

129. or/126‐128

130. Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors/

131. ((phosphodiesterase2 or phosphodiesterase‐2 or phosphodiesteraseII or phosphodiesterase‐II) adj (antagonist* or inhibitor*)).tw.

132. antiphosphodiesterase*.tw.

133. Caffeine.tw.

134. calcium sensitiser*.tw.

135. Levosimendan.tw.

136. or/130‐135

137. tilarginine.tw.

138. 12 or 44 or 125 or 129 or 136 or 137

139. 6 and 138

140. randomized controlled trial.pt.

141. controlled clinical trial.pt.

142. randomized.ab.

143. placebo.ab.

144. drug therapy.fs.

145. randomly.ab.

146. trial.ab.

147. groups.ab.

148. or/140‐147

149. exp animals/ not humans.sh.

150. 148 not 149

151. 139 and 150

Embase Ovid

1. Shock, Cardiogenic/

2. cardiogenic* shock*.tw.

3. Cardiac Output, Low/

4. (low adj2 cardiac output).tw.

5. ((instab* or unstab*) adj h?emodynamic*).tw.

6. or/1‐5

7. Drug Therapy/

8. ((drug or medica* or pharmacological) adj (therap* or treatment)).tw.

9. exp Drug Administration Routes/

10. drug administ*.tw.

11. Drug Administration Schedule/

12. or/7‐11

13. exp Cardiotonic Agents/

14. cardiotonic.tw.

15. ((myocardial or cardiac) adj stimula*).tw.

16. inotrope*.tw.

17. inotropic agent*.tw.

18. cardioprotective agent*.tw.

19. acetyldigitoxin*.tw.

20. acetyldigoxin*.tw.

21. adrenomedullin.tw.

22. amrinone.tw.

23. carbachol.tw.

24. cardiac glycoside*.tw.

25. cymarine.tw.

26. deslanoside.tw.

27. digitalis glycoside*.tw.

28. digitoxin.tw.

29. digoxin.tw.

30. dobutamine.tw.

31. dopamine.tw.

32. enoximone.tw.

33. etilefrine.tw.

34. isoproterenol.tw.

35. lisinopril.tw.

36. medigoxin.tw.

37. milrinone.tw.

38. ouabain.tw.

39. oxyfedrine.tw.

40. phenylephrine.tw.

41. prenalterol.tw.

42. proscillaridin.tw.

43. strophanthin*.tw.

44. or/13‐43

45. exp Vasodilator Agents/

46. vasodilators.tw.

47. vasodilator drug*.tw.

48. vasodilator agent*.tw.

49. vasorelaxant*.tw.

50. vasoactive antagonist*.tw.

51. acetylcholine.tw.

52. adenosine*.tw.

53. adrenomedullin.tw.

54. alprostadil.tw.

55. amlodipine.tw.

56. amyl nitrite.tw.

57. bencyclane.tw.

58. bepridil.tw.

59. betahistine.tw.

60. bradykinin.tw.

61. celiprolol.tw.

62. chromonar.tw.

63. cromakalim.tw.

64. cyclandelate.tw.

65. diazoxide.tw.

66. dihydroergocristine.tw.

67. dihydroergocryptine.tw.

68. dilazep.tw.

69. diltiazem.tw.

70. dipyridamole.tw.

71. dyphylline.tw.

72. ergoloid mesylate*.tw.

73. erythrityl tetranitrate.tw.

74. felodipine.tw.

75. fenoldopam.tw.

76. flunarizine.tw.

77. hexobendine.tw.

78. hydralazine.tw.

79. iloprost.tw.

80. isosorbide dinitrate.tw.

81. isoxsuprine.tw.

82. isradipine.tw.

83. kallidin.tw.

84. lidoflazine.tw.

85. mibefradil.tw.

86. minoxidil.tw.

87. molsidomine.tw.

88. moxisylyte.tw.

89. nafronyl.tw.

90. niacin.tw.

91. nicardipine.tw.

92. nicergoline.tw.

93. nicorandil.tw.

94. nicotinyl alcohol.tw.

95. nifedipine.tw.

96. nimodipine.tw.

97. nisoldipine.tw.

98. nitrendipine.tw.

99. nitroglycerin.tw.

100. nitroprusside.tw.

101. nonachlazine.tw.

102. nylidrin.tw.

103. oxprenolol.tw.

104. oxyfedrine.tw.

105. papaverine.tw.

106. pentaerythritol tetranitrate.tw.

107. pentoxifylline.tw.

108. phenoxybenzamine.tw.

109. pinacidil.tw.

110. pindolol.tw.

111. Pituitary Adenylate Cyclase‐Activating Polypeptide.tw.

112. prenylamine.tw.

113. propranolol.tw.

114. S‐Nitroso‐N‐Acetylpenicillamine.tw.

115. S‐Nitrosoglutathione.tw.

116. S‐Nitrosothiols.tw.

117. Suloctidil.tw.

118. Theobromine.tw.

119. Tolazoline.tw.

120. Trapidil.tw.

121. Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide.tw.

122. Verapamil.tw.

123. Vincamine.tw.

124. Xanthinol Niacinate.tw.

125. or/45‐124

126. exp Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/

127. Epoprostenol.tw.

128. Ketanserin.tw.

129. or/126‐128

130. Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors/

131. ((phosphodiesterase2 or phosphodiesterase‐2 or phosphodiesteraseII or phosphodiesterase‐II) adj (antagonist* or inhibitor*)).tw.

132. antiphosphodiesterase*.tw.

133. Caffeine.tw.

134. calcium sensitiser*.tw.

135. Levosimendan.tw.

136. or/130‐135

137. tilarginine.tw.

138. 12 or 44 or 125 or 129 or 136 or 137

139. 6 and 138

140. random$.tw.

141. factorial$.tw.

142. crossover$.tw.

143. cross over$.tw.

144. cross‐over$.tw.

145. placebo$.tw.

146. (doubl$ adj blind$).tw.

147. (singl$ adj blind$).tw.

148. assign$.tw.

149. allocat$.tw.

150. volunteer$.tw.

151. crossover procedure/

152. double blind procedure/

153. randomized controlled trial/

154. single blind procedure/

155. or/140‐154

156. (animal/ or nonhuman/) not human/

157. 155 not 156

158. 139 and 157

CPCI‐S Web of Science

#23 #22 AND #21

#22 TS=((random* or blind* or allocat* or assign* or trial* or placebo* or crossover* or cross‐over*))

#21 #20 AND #1

#20 #19 OR #18 OR #17 OR #16 OR #15 OR #14 OR #13 OR #12 OR #11 OR #10 OR #9 OR #8 OR #7 OR #6 OR #5 OR #4 OR #3 OR #2

#19 TS=( Caffeine or "calcium sensitiser*" or Levosimendan or tilarginine)

#18 TS=("phosphodiesterase2 antagonist*" or "phosphodiesterase‐2antagonist*" or "phosphodiesteraseII antagonist*" or "phosphodiesterase‐II antagonist*" or "phosphodiesterase2 inhibitor*" or "phosphodiesterase‐2 inhibitor*" or "phosphodiesteraseII inhibitor*"or "phosphodiesterase‐II inhibitor*")

#17 TS=(platelet near/2 inhibitor* or Epoprostenol or Ketanserin)

#16 TS=(Vincamine or "Xanthinol Niacinate")

#15 TS=(S‐Nitrosothiols or Sodium Azide or Suloctidil or Theobromine or Theophylline or Thiouracil or Tolazoline or Trapidil or Trimetazidine or "Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide" or Verapamil)

#14 TS=(S‐Nitrosothiols or Suloctidil or Theobromine or Tolazoline or Trapidil or "Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide" or Verapamil)

#13 TS=(S‐Nitrosothiols or Sodium Azide or Suloctidil or Theobromine or Theophylline or Thiouracil or Tolazoline or Trapidil or Trimetazidine or "Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide" or Verapamil)

#12 TS=("Pituitary Adenylate Cyclase‐Activating Polypeptide" or prenylamine or propranolol or S‐Nitrosoglutathione)

#11 TS=(nonachlazine or nylidrin or oxprenolol or oxyfedrine or papaverine or "pentaerythritol tetranitrate" or pentoxifylline or phenoxybenzamine or pinacidil or pindolol)

#10 TS=(nicorandil or "nicotinyl alcohol" or nifedipine or nimodipine or nisoldipine or nitrendipine or nitroglycerin or nitroprusside)

#9 TS=(lidoflazine or mibefradil or minoxidil or molsidomine or moxisylyte or nafronyl or niacin or nicardipine or nicergoline)

#8 TS=(fenoldopam or flunarizine or hexobendine or hydralazine or "isosorbide dinitrate" or isoxsuprine or isradipine or kallidin)

#7 TS=(dilazep or diltiazem or dipyridamole or dyphylline or "ergoloid mesylate*" or "erythrityl tetranitrate" or felodipine)

#6 TS=(celiprolol or chromonar or cromakalim or cyclandelate or diazoxide or dihydroergocristine or dihydroergocryptine)

#5 TS=(adrenomedullin or alprostadil or amlodipine or "amyl nitrite" or bencyclane or bepridil or betahistine or bradykinin)

#4 TS=(vasodilators or vasodilator drug* or vasodilator agent* or vasorelaxant* or vasoactive antagonist* or acetylcholine or adenosine*)

#3 TS=(cardiotonic or "myocardial stimula*" or "cardiac stimula*" or inotrope* or "inotropic agent*" or "cardioprotective agent*" or acetyldigitoxin* or acetyldigoxin* or adrenomedullin or amrinone or carbachol or cardiac glycoside* or cymarine or deslanoside or digitoxin or digoxin or dobutamine or enoximone or etilefrine or lisinopril or medigoxin or milrinone or ouabain or oxyfedrine or phenylephrine or prenalterol or proscillaridin or strophanthin*)

#2 TS=("drug treatment" or "medica* treatment "or "pharmacological treatment") OR TS=("drug therap*" or "medica* therap*" or "pharmacological therap*" or "drug administ*")

#1 TS=("cardiogenic* shock" OR low near/2 "cardiac output" OR "instab* h?emodynamic" or "unstab* h?emodynamic ")

Controlled trials (ISRCTN registry)

Search 1: cardiogenic shock

Search 2: low cardiac output

Centerwatch

search by Medical condition (cardiac ischemia, myocardial ischemia, heart failure) and therapeutic area (cardiogenic shock, low cardiac output)

Clinicaltrials.gov

Search 1: Conditions: cardiogenic shock

Search 2: Conditions: low cardiac output

ICTRP

Search 1:

Condition: cardiogenic shock or low cardiac output

AND

Intervention: acetyldigitoxin or acetyldigoxin or adrenomedullin or amrinone or carbachol or cardiac gycoside or cymarine or deslanoside or digitalis glycoside or digitoxin or digoxin or dobutamine

Search 2:

Condition: cardiogenic shock or low cardiac output

AND

Intervention: enoximone or etilefrine.or isoproterenol or lisinopril or medigoxin or milrinone or ouabain or oxyfedrine or phenylephrine or prenalterol or proscillaridin or strophanthin

Search 3:

Condition: cardiogenic shock or low cardiac output

AND

Intervention: acetylcholine or adenosine or adrenomedullin or alprostadil or amlodipine or amyl nitrite or bencyclane or bepridil or betahistine or bradykinin or celiprolol or chromonar or cromakalim or cyclandelate or diazoxide or dihydroergocristine

Search 4:

Condition: cardiogenic shock or low cardiac output

AND

Intervention: dihydroergocryptine or dilazep or diltiazem or dipyridamole or dyphylline or ergoloid mesylate or erythrityl tetranitrate or felodipine or fenoldopam or flunarizine or hexobendine or hydralazine iloprost or isosorbide dinitrate or isoxsuprine or isradipine

Search 5:

Condition: cardiogenic shock or low cardiac output

AND

Intervention: kallidin or lidoflazine or mibefradil or minoxidil or molsidomine or moxisylyte or nafronyl or niacin or nicardipine or nicergoline or nicorandil or nicotinyl alcohol or nifedipine or nimodipine or nisoldipine or nitrendipine or nitroglycerin

Search 6:

Condition: cardiogenic shock or low cardiac output

AND

Intervention: nitroprusside or nonachlazine or nylidrin or oxprenolol or oxyfedrine or papaverine or pentaerythritol tetranitrate or pentoxifylline or phenoxybenzamine or pinacidil or pindolol or Pituitary Adenylate or Cyclase‐Activating Polypeptide or prenylamine

Search 7:

Condition: cardiogenic shock or low cardiac output

AND

Intervention: propranolol or S‐Nitroso‐N‐Acetylpenicillamine or S‐Nitrosoglutathione or S‐Nitrosothiols or Suloctidil or Theobromine or Tolazoline or Trapidil or Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide or Verapamil or Vincamine or Xanthinol Niacinate

Search 8:

Condition: cardiogenic shock or low cardiac output

AND

Intervention: Epoprostenol or Ketanserin or Phosphodiesterase Inhibitor or phosphodiesterase2 or phosphodiesterase‐2 or phosphodiesteraseII or phosphodiesterase‐II or antiphosphodiesterase or Caffeine or calcium sensitiser or Levosimendan or tilarginine

Study flow diagram
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Study flow diagram

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 3

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies

Comparison 1 Levosimendan versus control, Outcome 1 All‐cause short‐term mortality.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Levosimendan versus control, Outcome 1 All‐cause short‐term mortality.

Comparison 1 Levosimendan versus control, Outcome 2 All‐cause short‐term mortality: subgroup analysis.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Levosimendan versus control, Outcome 2 All‐cause short‐term mortality: subgroup analysis.

Comparison 1 Levosimendan versus control, Outcome 3 All‐cause long‐term mortality.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Levosimendan versus control, Outcome 3 All‐cause long‐term mortality.

Comparison 1 Levosimendan versus control, Outcome 4 All‐cause long‐term mortality:subgroup analysis.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Levosimendan versus control, Outcome 4 All‐cause long‐term mortality:subgroup analysis.

Comparison 1 Levosimendan versus control, Outcome 5 Cardiac index.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 Levosimendan versus control, Outcome 5 Cardiac index.

Comparison 1 Levosimendan versus control, Outcome 6 Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 Levosimendan versus control, Outcome 6 Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure.

Comparison 1 Levosimendan versus control, Outcome 7 Mean arterial pressure.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.7

Comparison 1 Levosimendan versus control, Outcome 7 Mean arterial pressure.

Comparison 2 Levosimendan versus control: sensitivity analyses, Outcome 1 All‐cause short‐term mortality: fixed‐effect model.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Levosimendan versus control: sensitivity analyses, Outcome 1 All‐cause short‐term mortality: fixed‐effect model.

Comparison 2 Levosimendan versus control: sensitivity analyses, Outcome 2 All‐cause short‐term mortality: low risk of bias.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2 Levosimendan versus control: sensitivity analyses, Outcome 2 All‐cause short‐term mortality: low risk of bias.

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Levosimendan compared to dobutamine for cardiogenic shock or low cardiac output syndrome

Levosimendan compared to dobutamine for cardiogenic shock or low cardiac output syndrome

Patient or population: people with cardiogenic shock or low cardiac output syndrome
Settings: hospital
Intervention: levosimendan
Comparison: dobutamine

Outcomes

Anticipated absolute effects (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No of participants
(studies)

Quality

Comments

Risk with

dobutamine

Risk with

levosimendan

All‐cause, short‐term mortality: range 15 days to 12 months

Moderate1

RR 0.60
(0.37 to 0.95)

1776
(6 studies)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
low3,4

Studies included participants with LCOS or CS due to cardiac surgery, HF or AMI

154 per 1000

92 per 1000
(57 to 146)

High2

500 per 1000

300 per 1000
(185 to 475)

*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
AMI: acute myocardial infarction; CI: confidence interval; CS: cardiogenic shock; HF: heart failure; LCOS: low cardiac output syndrome; RR: risk ratio

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.
Moderate quality: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate; the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.
Low quality: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate; the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.
Very low quality: we have very little confidence in the effect estimate; the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.

1Control group risk estimate comes from the median risk among the control group risk in included studies with participants with low cardiac output, low cardiac output or cardiogenic shock, or cardiogenic shock.
2Control group risk estimate comes from a large observational study, due to the small size of included studies in this population (Singh 2007).
3Downgraded one step due to study limitations because of lack of blinding of participants and physicians in four studies, high risk of bias due to loss to follow‐up in one study, and baseline imbalances on prognostic relevance in one study.
4Downgraded one step for imprecision due to few events.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings for the main comparison. Levosimendan compared to dobutamine for cardiogenic shock or low cardiac output syndrome
Summary of findings 2. Levosimendan compared to placebo for cardiogenic shock or low cardiac output syndrome

Levosimendan compared with placebo for cardiogenic shock or low cardiac output syndrome

Patient or population: adults with cardiogenic shock or low cardiac output syndrome

Settings: hospital

Intervention: levosimendan

Comparison: placebo

Outcomes

Anticipated absolute effects (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No of participants
(studies)

Quality

Comments

Risk with placebo

Risk with levosimendan

All‐cause short‐term mortality: range 4 to 6 months

Moderate1

RR 0.48 (0.12 to 1.94)

55
(2)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
very low3,4

Studies included participants with LCOS or CS due to HF or AMI

187 per 1000

90 per 1000
(22 to 363)

High2

500 per 1000

240 per 1000
(60 to 970)

*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
AMI: acute myocardial infarction; CI: confidence interval; CS: cardiogenic shock; HF: heart failure; LCOS: low cardiac output syndrome; RR: risk ratio

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.
Moderate quality: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate; the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.
Low quality: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate; the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.
Very low quality: we have very little confidence in the effect estimate; the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.

1Control group risk estimate comes from median risk among the control group risk in included studies with low cardiac output or cardiogenic shock.
2Control group risk estimate comes from a large observational study, due to the small size of included studies in this population (Singh 2007).
3Downgraded one step due to study limitation because of lack of blinding of participants and physicians, and missing information on randomisation in the larger study.
4Downgraded two steps for imprecision due to few events and the confidence interval crosses the line of no difference and includes possible benefit from both approaches.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 2. Levosimendan compared to placebo for cardiogenic shock or low cardiac output syndrome
Summary of findings 3. Levosimendan compared to enoximone for cardiogenic shock

Levosimendan compared with enoximone for cardiogenic shock

Patient or population: adults with cardiogenic shock

Settings: hospital

Intervention: levosimendan

Comparison: enoximone

Outcomes

Anticipated absolute effects (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No of participants
(studies)

Quality

Comments

Risk with enoximone

Risk with levosimendan

All‐cause short‐term mortality: 30 days

625 per 10001

313 per 1000

(138 to 712)

RR 0.50 (0.22 to 1.14)

32
(1)

⊕⊝⊝⊝

very low2,3

Study included participants with CS due to AMI

*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
AMI: acute myocardial infarction; CI: confidence interval; CS: cardiogenic shock; RR: risk ratio

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.
Moderate quality: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate; the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.
Low quality: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate; the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.
Very low quality: we have very little confidence in the effect estimate; the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.

1Control group risk estimate comes from the control group risk in a small included study with low cardiac output or cardiogenic shock.
2Downgraded one step for imprecision because the confidence interval crosses the line of no difference and includes possible benefit from both approaches.
3Downgraded two steps due to study limitation with lack of blinding of participants and physicians, baseline differences and stopping for early benefit in one study.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 3. Levosimendan compared to enoximone for cardiogenic shock
Summary of findings 4. Epinephrine compared to norepinephrine‐dobutamine for low cardiac output syndrome

Epinephrine compared with norepinephrine‐dobutamine for low cardiac output syndrome

Patient or population: adults with low cardiac output syndrome

Setting: in‐hospital

Intervention: epinephrine

Comparison: norepinephrine‐dobutamine

Outcomes

Anticipated absolute effects (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No of participants
(studies)

Quality

Comments

Risk with norepinephrine‐dobutamine

Risk with epinephrine

All‐cause short‐term mortality: 28 days

267 per 1000

333 per 1000
(109 to 1000)

RR 1.25 (0.41 to 3.77)

30
(1)

⊕⊝⊝⊝

very low1,2

Study included participants with LCOS due to HF

*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: confidence interval; LCOS: low cardiac output syndrome; HF: heart failure; RR: risk ratio

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.
Moderate quality: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate; the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.
Low quality: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate; the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.
Very low quality: we have very little confidence in the effect estimate; the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.

1Downgraded two steps for imprecision due to few events, and the confidence interval crosses the line of no difference and includes possible benefit from both approaches.
2Downgraded one step due to study limitation, with lack of blinding of participants and physicians.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 4. Epinephrine compared to norepinephrine‐dobutamine for low cardiac output syndrome
Summary of findings 5. Amrinone compared to dobutamine for low cardiac output syndrome

Amrinone compared with dobutamine for low cardiac output syndrome

Patient or population: adults with low cardiac output syndrome

Setting: hospital

Intervention: amrinone

Comparison: dobutamine

Outcomes

Anticipated absolute effects (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No of participants
(studies)

Quality

Comments

Risk with dobutamine

Risk with amrinone

All‐cause short‐term mortality: 30 days

200 per 10001

66 per 1000
(8 to 570)

RR 0.33 (0.04 to 2.85)

30
(1)

⊕⊝⊝⊝

very low2,3

Study included participants with LCOS following cardiac surgery

*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: confidence interval; LCOS: low cardiac output syndrome; RR: risk ratio

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.
Moderate quality: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate; the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.
Low quality: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate; the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.
Very low quality: we have very little confidence in the effect estimate; the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.

1Control group risk estimate comes from the control group risk in participants with low cardiac output and no cardiogenic shock in the included small study.
2Downgraded two steps for serious imprecision due to few events, and the confidence interval crosses the line of no difference and includes possible benefit from both approaches.
3Downgraded one step due to study limitation, with lack of blinding of participants and physicians.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 5. Amrinone compared to dobutamine for low cardiac output syndrome
Summary of findings 6. Dopexamine compared to dopamine for cardiogenic shock or low cardiac output syndrome

Dopexamine compared with dopamine for cardiogenic shock or low cardiac output syndrome

Patient or population: adults with cardiogenic shock or low cardiac output syndrome

Setting: hospital

Intervention: dopexamine

Comparison: dopamine

Outcomes

Anticipated absolute effects (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No of participants
(studies)

Quality

Comments

Risk with dopexamine

Risk with dopamine

All‐cause short‐term mortality: time in hospital

500 per 10001

Not estimable2

RR not estimable2

70
(1)

⊕⊝⊝⊝

very low3,4

Study included participants with LCOS/CS following elective surgery for CABG

*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CABG: coronary artery bypass graft surgery; CI: confidence interval; CS: cardiogenic shock; LCOS: low cardiac output syndrome; RR: risk ratio

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.
Moderate quality: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate; the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.
Low quality: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate; the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.
Very low quality: we have very little confidence in the effect estimate; the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.

1Control group risk estimate comes from a large observational study, due to the small size of included studies in this population (Singh 2007).
2No in‐hospital deaths were observed in the study.
3Downgraded two steps for imprecision due to no observed events, and not estimable risk ratio and confidence interval, which results in possible benefit from both approaches.
4Downgraded one step due to indirectness. Due to the very low mortality and morbidity in the study population, we assume that inclusion of participants with low cardiac output syndrome was based on other definitions, as there were no hospital deaths or major adverse events in this study.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 6. Dopexamine compared to dopamine for cardiogenic shock or low cardiac output syndrome
Summary of findings 7. Enoximone compared to dobutamine for low cardiac output syndrome

Enoximone compared with dobutamine for low cardiac output syndrome

Patient or population: adults with low cardiac output syndrome

Setting: hospital

Intervention: enoximone

Comparison: dobutamine

Outcomes

Anticipated absolute effects (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No of participants
(studies)

Quality

Comments

Risk with dobutamine

Risk with enoximone

All‐cause short‐term mortality: 1 month

500 per 10001

Not estimable2

RR not estimable2

40
(1)

⊕⊝⊝⊝

very low3,4

Study included participants with LCOS after mitral valve surgery

*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: confidence interval; LCOS: low cardiac output syndrome; RR: risk ratio

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.
Moderate quality: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate; the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.
Low quality: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate; the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.
Very low quality: we have very little confidence in the effect estimate; the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.

1Control group risk estimate comes from a large observational study, due to the small size of included studies in this population (Singh 2007).
2No in‐hospital deaths were observed in the study.
3Downgraded two steps for imprecision due to few events, and risk ratio and confidence interval were not estimable, which results in possible benefit from both approaches.
4Downgraded one step due to indirectness. Due to the very low mortality in the study population, we assume that inclusion of participants with low cardiac output syndrome was based on other definitions.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 7. Enoximone compared to dobutamine for low cardiac output syndrome
Summary of findings 8. Nitric oxide compared to placebo for cardiogenic shock

Nitric oxide compared with placebo for cardiogenic shock

Patient or population: adults with cardiogenic shock

Setting: in‐hospital

Intervention: nitric oxide

Comparison: placebo

Outcomes

Anticipated absolute effects (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No of participants
(studies)

Quality

Comments

Risk with nitric oxide

Risk with placebo

All‐cause short‐term mortality: 1 month

500 per 10001

Not estimable2

RR not estimable2

3
(1)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low3,4

Study included participants with CS due to AMI

*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
AMI: acute myocardial infarction; CI: confidence interval; CS: cardiogenic shock; RR: risk ratio

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.
Moderate quality: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate; the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.
Low quality: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate; the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.
Very low quality: we have very little confidence in the effect estimate; the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.

1Control group risk estimate comes from a large observational study, due to the small size of included studies in this population (Singh 2007).
2One death out of one participant with placebo and no deaths in two participants with nitric oxide, risk ratio was not estimable due to the small number of participants.
3Downgraded two steps for imprecision because the risk ratio and confidence interval were not estimated due to few events and participants, which results in possible benefit from both approaches
4Downgraded one step due to study limitation, with early stop due to lack of enrolment.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 8. Nitric oxide compared to placebo for cardiogenic shock
Table 1. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (no deaths) in hospital

Comparison

Primary studies

MACE

Intervention

Control

RR (95% CI)

events

total

events

total

Levosimendan vs dobutamine

Levin 2008

Perioperative infarction

1 (1.4%)

69

8 (11.8%)

68

0.12 (0.02 to 0.96)

Garcίa‐González 2006

Re‐infarction

0 (0%)

11

0 (0%)

11

Not estimable

Levin 2008

Cerebrovascular accidents

2 (2.9%)

69

6 (8.8%)

68

0.33 (0.07 to 1.57)

Garcίa‐González 2006

Cerebrovascular accidents

0 (0%)

11

0 (0%)

11

Not estimable

Levosimendan vs placebo

Husebye 2013

MACE (death, non‐fatal myocardial infarction, revascularisation of the infarct‐related artery)

2 (50.0%)

4

2 (40.0%)

5

1.25 (0.29 to 5.35)

Repeat PCI

1 (25.0%)

4

0 (0%)

5

3.60 (0.18 to 70.34)

Amrinone vs dobutamine

Dupuis 1992

Re‐infarction (2 h)

0 (0%)

15

6 (40.0%)

15

0.08 (0.00 to 1.25)

Dopexamine vs dopamine

Rosseel 1997

Perioperative infarction

3 (8.6%)

35

2 (5.7%)

35

1.50 (0.27 to 8.43)

Nitric oxide vs placebo

Baldassarre 2008

Myocardial infarction

1 (50.0%)

2

1 (100%)

1

0.67 (0.17 to 2.67)

CI: confidence interval; PCI: percutaneous coronary intervention; RR: risk ratio

Figuras y tablas -
Table 1. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (no deaths) in hospital
Table 2. Length of hospital stay

Comparison

Primary studies

Reported information

Intervention

Control

Events/time

Total

Events/time

Total

Levosimendan vs dobutamine

Levin 2008

Stay in ICU (hours, median with IQR)

66 (58‐74)

69

158 (106‐182)

68

Levosimendan vs enoximone

Fuhrmann 2008

Stay in ICU (days, median with IQR)

10 (5‐23)

16

13 (7‐19)

16

Enoximone vs dobutamine

Atallah 1990

Stay in ICU (hours, mean)

92 ± 37

18

155 ± 129

19

ICU: intensive care unit; IQR: intra‐quartile‐range

Figuras y tablas -
Table 2. Length of hospital stay
Table 3. Haemodynamics

Comparison

Primary studies

Haemodynamics

Intervention

Control

MD (95% CI)

Intervention vs control

last measurements

mean ± SD or median (IQR)

total

mean ± SD or median (IQR)

total

Levosimendan vs dobutamine

Adamopoulos 2006

Cardiac index (after 72 h, L/min/m2)

1.9 ± 0.1

23

1.8 ± 0.04

23

0.10 (0.06 to 0.14)

Alvarez 2006

Cardiac index (after 48 h, L/min/m2)

2.8 ± 0.3

21

2.3 ± 0.2

20

0.50 (0.34 to 0.66)

Garcίa‐González 2006

Cardiac index (after 30 h, L/min/m2)

2.9 ± 0.4

11

2.4 ± 0.2

11

0.50 (0.24 to 0.76)

Levin 2008

Cardiac index (after 48 hrs, L/min/m2)

3.4 ± 0.2

69

2.7 ± 0.1

68

0.70 (0.65 to 0.75)

Adamopoulos 2006

PCWP (after 72 h, mmHg)

19.0 ± 1

23

23.0 ± 1.0

23

‐4.00 (‐4.60 to ‐3.40)

Alvarez 2006

MAP (after 48 h, mmHg)

77.0 ± 5

21

81.0 ± 7.0

20

‐4.00 (‐7.70 to ‐0.30)

Levin 2008

MAP (after 48 h, mmHg)

78.8 ± 7

69

80.1 ± 4

68

‐1.30 (‐3.20 to 0.60)

Levosimendan vs placebo

Adamopoulos 2006

Cardiac index (after 72 h, (L/min/m2)

1.9 ± 0.1

23

1.8 ± 0.1

23

0.10 (0.04 to 0.16)

Adamopoulos 2006

PCWP (after 72 h, mmHg)

19.0 ± 1

23

23.0 ± 1.0

23

‐4.00 (‐4.60 to ‐3.40)

Levosimendan vs enoximone

Fuhrmann 2008

Cardiac index (after 48 h, L/min/m2)

3.1 (2.5‐3.5)

16

3.1 (2.8‐3.3)

16

Not estimable

Fuhrmann 2008

MAP (after 48 h (mmHg)

75.0 (58.0‐79.0)

16

70.0 (63.0‐83.0)

16

Not estimable

Epinephrine vs norepinephrine‐dobutamine

Levy 2011

Cardiac index (after 24 h, L/min/m2)

2.9 ± 0.5

15

2.8 ± 0.4

15

0.10 (‐0.22 to 0.42)

Levy 2011

MAP (after 24 h, mmHg)

64 ± 9

15

65.0 ± 11.0

15

‐1.00 (‐8.20 to 6.20)

Dopexamine vs dopamine

Rosseel 1997

Cardiac index (after 6 h, L/min/m2)

3.1 ± 0.7

29

2.8 ± 0.5

30

0.30 (‐0.01 to 0.61)

Rosseel 1997

PCWP (after 6 h, mmHg)

9.3 ± 3.2

29

10.8 ± 2.9

30

‐1.50 (‐3.10 to 0.10)

Rosseel 1997

MAP (after 6 h, mmHg)

76.3 ± 11.5

29

78.2 ± 12.8

30

‐1.90 (‐8.10 to 4.30)

CI: confidence interval; IQR: intra‐quartile‐range; MAP: mean arterial pressure; MD: mean difference; PCWP: pulmonary capillary wedge pressure; SD: standard deviation

Figuras y tablas -
Table 3. Haemodynamics
Table 4. Adverse events

Comparison

Primary studies

Adverse events (no MACE)

Intervention

Control

events

total

events

total

Levosimendan vsdobutamine

Alvarez 2006, Levin 2008, Mebazaa (SURVIVE) 2007

Atrial fibrillation

78 (10.4%)

750

71 (9.5%)

748

Mebazaa (SURVIVE) 2007

Ventricular fibrillation

15 (2.3%)

660

19 (2.9%)

660

Alvarez 2006, Follath(LIDO) 2002, Levin 2008

Ventricular arrhythmias

7 (3.6%)

193

25 (13.3%)

188

Mebazaa (SURVIVE) 2007

Ventricular tachycardia

52 (7.9%)

660

48 (7.3%)

660

Ventricular extrasystoles

40 (6.1%)

660

24 (3.6%)

660

Tachycardia

33 (5.0%)

660

33 (5.0%)

660

Bradycardia

8 (1.2%)

660

17 (2.6%)

660

Follath(LIDO) 2002, Mebazaa (SURVIVE) 2007

Headache

69 (9.0%)

763

36 (4.7%)

760

Cardiac failure

91 (11.9%)

763

127 (16.7%)

760

Mebazaa (SURVIVE) 2007

Congestive cardiac failure

26 (3.9%)

660

22 (3.3%)

660

Cardiac arrest

20 (3.0%)

660

26 (3.9%)

660

Follath(LIDO) 2002, Mebazaa (SURVIVE) 2007

Disorder aggravated

17 (2,2%)

763

27 (3.6%)

760

Gastrointestinal disorders

54 (7.1%)

763

52 (6.8%)

760

Levin 2008, Mebazaa (SURVIVE) 2007

Acute kidney failure

29

(4.0%)

729

43

(5.9%)

728

Levin 2008

Need for dialysis

2 (2.9%)

69

8 (11.9%)

68

Levin 2008, Mebazaa (SURVIVE) 2007

Pneumonia

34 (4.7%)

729

34 (4.7%)

728

Garcίa‐González 2006

Multiple organ failure

0 (0%)

11

0 (0%)

11

Stroke

0 (0%)

11

0 (0%)

11

Levin 2008

Vasoplegia

1

(1.4 %)

69

9

(13.2%)

68

Dyspnoea

1 (1.4%)

69

4 (5.8%)

68

Inflammatory response syndrome

4 (5.8%)

69

15 (22.1%)

68

Sepsis

1 (1.4%)

69

9 (13.2%)

68

Prolonged ventilatory assistance

6 (8.7%)

69

22 (32.3%)

68

Mebazaa (SURVIVE) 2007

Hypokalaemia

62 (9.4%)

660

39 (5.9%)

660

Hyperkalaemia

15 (2.3%)

660

16 (2.4%)

660

Hypotension

102 (15.5%)

660

92 (13.9%)

660

Nausea

45 (6.8%)

660

49 (7.4%)

660

Insomnia

37 (5.6%)

660

29 (4.4%)

660

Chest pain

32 (4.8%)

660

47 (7.1%)

660

Constipation

26 (3.9%)

660

28 (4.2%)

660

Pyrexia

22 (3.3%)

660

19 (2.9%)

660

Urinary tract infection

21 (3.2%)

660

30 (4.5%)

660

Anexiety

20 (3.0%)

660

19 (2.9%)

660

Pulmonary oedema

20 (3.0%)

660

18 (2.7%)

660

Dizziness

19 (2.9%)

660

16 (2.4%)

660

Cough

19 (2.9%)

660

21 (3.2%)

660

Pain in extremity

18 (2.7%)

660

10 (1.5%)

660

Pruritus

16 (2.4%)

660

7 (1.1%)

660

Anaemia

15 (2.3%)

660

17 (2.6%)

660

Epistaxis

14 (2.1%)

660

7 (1.1%)

660

Back pain

13 (2.0%)

660

18 (2.7%)

660

Angina pectoris

12 (1.8%)

660

18 (2.7%)

660

Muscle spasms

12 (1.8%)

660

13 (2.0%)

660

Dyspnoea

9 (1.4%)

660

17 (2.6%)

660

Hypertension

9 (1.4%)

660

15 (2.3%)

660

Cataract

7 (1.1%)

660

14 (2.1%)

660

Agitation

7 (1.1%)

660

0 (0%)

660

Levosimendan vsplacebo

Husebye 2013

Non‐sustained ventricular tachycardia

1 (25.0%)

4

3 (60.0%)

5

Atrial fibrillation

1 (25.0%)

4

0 (0%)

5

Episodes of hypotension during drug infusion (MAP fall > 10 mmHg)

2 (50.0%)

4

1 (20.0%)

5

Levosimendan vsenoximone

Fuhrmann 2008

Need of mechanical ventilation

13 (81.3%)

16

15 (93.8%)

16

Acute renal failure

5 (31.3%)

16

8 (50.0%)

16

Need of continuous renal replacement therapy

5 (31.5%)

16

8 (50.0%)

16

New onset atrial fibrillation

7 (43.8%)

16

9 (56.3%)

16

Ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation

8 (50.0%)

16

11 (68.8%)

16

Development of systemic inflammatory response

8 (50.0%)

16

13 (81.3%)

16

Pneumonia

7 (43.8%)

16

7 (43.8%)

16

Urinary infections

0 (0%)

16

2 (12.5%)

16

Sepsis

3 (18.8%)

16

2 (12.5%)

16

Epinephrine vs. norepinephrine‐dobutamine

Levy 2011

Supraventricular arrhythmia

2 (13.3%)

15

0 (0%)

15

Sustained ventricular tachycardia

1 (6.7%)

15

0 (0%)

15

Amrinone vs. dobutamine

Dupuis 1992

Cardiac arrhythmias during treatment

0 (0%)

15

4 (26.7%)

15

Myocardial ischemias (within 16 to 20 hrs)

4 (26.7%)

15

4 (26.7%)

15

Dopexamine vs. dopamine

Rosseel 1997

Cardiac events

19 (54.3%)

35

22 (62.9%)

35

Abnormal blood loss

2 (5.7%)

35

1 (2.9%)

35

Kidney failure

1 (2.9%)

35

1 (2.9%)

35

Other adverse events

5 (14.3%)

35

1 (2.9%)

35

Major adverse events

0 (0%)

35

0 (0%)

35

MACE: major adverse cardiac events; MAP: mean arterial pressure

Figuras y tablas -
Table 4. Adverse events
Comparison 1. Levosimendan versus control

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 All‐cause short‐term mortality Show forest plot

8

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.1 Levosimendan versus dobutamine

6

1776

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.60 [0.37, 0.95]

1.2 Levosimendan versus placebo

2

55

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.48 [0.12, 1.94]

1.3 Levosimendan versus enoximone

1

32

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.5 [0.22, 1.14]

2 All‐cause short‐term mortality: subgroup analysis Show forest plot

6

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

2.1 Levosimendan versus dobutamine: males

1

956

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.91 [0.65, 1.27]

2.2 Levosimendan versus dobutamine: females

1

371

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.78 [0.46, 1.32]

2.3 Levosimendan versus dobutamine: age < 65 years

1

501

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.57, 1.81]

2.4 Levosimendan versus dobutamine: age ≥ 65 years

1

826

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.80 [0.58, 1.10]

2.5 Levosimendan versus dobutamine: LCOS due to HF

3

1576

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.69 [0.42, 1.11]

2.6 Levosimendan versus dobutamine: LCOS due to cardiac surgery

2

178

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.38 [0.17, 0.87]

2.7 Levosimendan versus placebo: LCOS due to HF

1

46

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.5 [0.10, 2.47]

2.8 Levosimendan versus placebo: CS due to AMI

1

9

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.4 [0.02, 7.82]

2.9 Levosimendan versus dobutamine: LCOS with no history of CHF

1

156

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.54 [0.82, 2.87]

2.10 Levosimendan versus dobutamine: LCOS with history of CHF

1

1171

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.76 [0.55, 1.04]

3 All‐cause long‐term mortality Show forest plot

4

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

3.1 Levosimendan versus dobutamine

3

1552

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.85 [0.65, 1.12]

3.2 Levosimendane versus dobutamine

1

22

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

3.0 [0.37, 24.58]

3.3 Levosimendan versus placebo

1

9

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.63 [0.08, 4.66]

4 All‐cause long‐term mortality:subgroup analysis Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

4.1 Levosimendan versus dobutamine: males

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.2 Levosimendan versus dobutamine: females

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.3 Levosimendan versus dobutamine: age < 65 years

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.4 Levosimendan versus dobutamine: age ≥ 65 years

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5 Cardiac index Show forest plot

6

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

5.1 Levosimendan versus dobutamine

4

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.2 Levosimendan versus placebo

1

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.3 Epinephrine versus norepinephrine‐dobutamine

1

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.4 Dopexamine versus dopamine

1

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6 Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

6.1 Levosimendan versus dobutamine

1

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.2 Levosimendan versus placebo

1

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.3 Dopexamine versus dopamine

1

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7 Mean arterial pressure Show forest plot

4

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

7.1 Levosimendan versus dobutamine

2

178

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐2.15 [‐4.61, 0.31]

7.2 Epinephrine versus norepinephrine‐dobutamine

1

30

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.0 [‐8.19, 6.19]

7.3 Dopexamine versus dopamine

1

59

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.90 [‐8.10, 4.30]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Levosimendan versus control
Comparison 2. Levosimendan versus control: sensitivity analyses

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 All‐cause short‐term mortality: fixed‐effect model Show forest plot

7

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.1 Levosimendan versus dobutamine

6

1776

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.73 [0.57, 0.93]

1.2 Levosimendan versus placebo

2

55

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.47 [0.12, 1.93]

2 All‐cause short‐term mortality: low risk of bias Show forest plot

2

1530

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.70 [0.39, 1.27]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 2. Levosimendan versus control: sensitivity analyses