Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for follow‐up after primary brain tumour treatment

The Cochrane Library

Evidencia fiable. Decisiones informadas. Mejor salud.

Versión publicada: 07 diciembre 2011 Historial de versiones

Ir a:

Table 1. Levels of quality of individual studies

Judgement of risk of bias	Quality rating of study
Risk of bias of all domains low	High methodological quality = ‘high‐quality study’
Unclear or high risk of bias for one or more domains	Low methodological quality = ‘low‐quality study’
High risk of bias for most domains	Very low methodological quality = ‘very low‐quality study’

Table 1. Levels of quality of individual studies

Table 2. Levels of evidence quality using the GRADE approach

Underlying methodology	Quality rating
Randomised trials or double‐upgraded observational studies	High
Downgraded randomised trials or upgraded observational studies	Moderate
Double‐downgraded randomised trials or observational studies	Low
Triple‐downgraded randomised trials or downgraded observational studies or case series/case reports	Very low

Table 2. Levels of evidence quality using the GRADE approach