Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for follow‐up after primary brain tumour treatment

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Referencias

Additional references

Andrews 2004

Andrews DW, Scott CB, Sperduto PW, Flanders AE, Gaspar LE, Schell MC, et al. Whole brain radiation therapy with or without stereotactic radiosurgery boost for patients with one to three brain metastases: phase III results of the RTOG 9508 randomised trial. Lancet 2004;363:1665‐72.

Arber 2010

Arber A, Faithfull S, Plaskota M, Lucas C, de Vries K. A study of patients with a primary malignant brain tumour and their carers: symptoms and access to services . International Journal of Palliative Nursing 2010;16(1):24‐30.

Aziz 2003

Aziz NM, Rowland JH. Trends and advances in cancer survivorship research: challenge and opportunity. Seminars in Radiation Oncology 2003;13(3):248–66.

Brain Foundation 2011

Brain tumour and brain cancer, Australia. Brain Foundation2011:Available from: http://brainfoundation.org.au/brain‐tumour.

Campbell 1999

Campbell ML, Sheets D, Strong PS. Secondary health conditions among middle aged individuals with chronic physical disabilities: implications for unmet needs for services. Assistive Technology 1999;11(2):105‐22.

Cancer Reform Strategy 2007

Department of Health. Cancer Reform Strategy. www.dh.gov.uk/en/Healthcare/NationalServiceFrameworks/Cancer/index.htm2007.

Corner 2007

Corner J, Richardson A. Cancer Survivorship Briefing Paper. http://www.macmillan.org.uk/Documents/Support_Material/Get_involved/Campaigns/ca2007.

Egger 1998

Egger M, Smith GD. Bias in location and selection of studies. BMJ 1998;16(7124):61‐6.

Fisk 1994

Fisk JD, Ritvo PG, Ross L, Haase DA, Marrie TJ, Schlech WF. Measuring the functional impact of fatigue: initial validation of the fatigue impact scale. Clinical Infectious Disease 1994;18(Suppl 1):S79‐83.

Flowers 2000

Flowers A. Brain tumors in the older person. Cancer Control 2000;7(6):523‐38.

Gabanelli 2005

Gabanelli P. A rehabilitative approach to the patient with brain cancer. Neurological Sciences 2005;26(Suppl 1):S51‐2.

Ganz 1992

Ganz PA, Schag CA, Lee TJ, Sims MS. The CARES: a generic measure of health related quality of life for patients with cancer. Quality of Life Research 1992;1:19‐29.

Geler‐Kulcu 2009

Geler‐Kulcu D, Gulsen G, Buyukbaba E, Ozkan D. Functional recovery of patients with brain tumor or acute stroke after rehabilitation: a comparative study. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience 2009;16(1):74‐8.

Gilworth 2003

Gilworth G, Chamberlain MA, Harvey A. Development of a work instability scale for rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis and Rheumatism 2003;49:349‐54.

Granger 1998

Granger CV. The emerging science of functional assessment: our tool for outcomes analysis. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1998;79:235‐40.

Greenberg 2006

Greenberg E, Treger I, Ring H. Rehabilitation outcomes in patients with brain tumors and acute stroke: comparative study of inpatient rehabilitation. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2006;85(7):568‐73.

Higgins 2011

Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from: www.cochrane‐handbook.org. The Cochrane Collaboration.

Hodgkinson 2007

Hodgkinson K, Butow P, Hunt G, Pendlebury S, Hobbs K, Wain G. Breast cancer survivors supportive care needs 2‐10 years after diagnosis. Supportive Care in Cancer 2007;15:515‐23.

Huang 2000

Huang ME, Cifu DX, Keyser‐Marcus L. Functional outcomes in patients with brain tumor after inpatient rehabilitation: comparison with traumatic brain injury. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2000;79(4):325‐35.

Huang 2001

Huang ME, Wartella JE, Kreutzer JS. Functional outcomes and quality of life in patients with brain tumors: a preliminary report. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2001;82(11):1540‐6.

Jemal 2009

Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics. CA: Cancer Journal for Clinicians 2009;59(4):225‐49.

Khan 2007

Khan F, Turner‐Stokes L, Ng L, Kilpatrick T. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for adults with multiple sclerosis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2007, Issue 2. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006036.pub2]

Kirshblum 2001

Kirshblum S, O'Dell MW, Ho C, Barr K. Rehabilitation of persons with central nervous system tumors. Cancer 2001;92(Suppl 4):1029‐38.

Louis 2007

Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Cavenee WK, Burger PC, Jouvet A, et al. The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. Acta Neuropathology 2007;114:97‐109.

Lovibond 1995

Lovibond SH, Lovibond PF. Manual for the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS). Sydney: Psychology Foundation of Australia, 1995.

MacVicar 1986

MacVicar MG, Winningham ML. Promoting functional capacity of cancer patients. Cancer Bulletin 1986;38:235‐9.

MacVicar 1989

MacVicar MG, Winningham ML, Nickel JL. Effects of aerobic interval training on cancer patients functional capacity. Nursing Research 1989;38:348‐51.

Mahoney 1965

Mahoney FI, Barthel D. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Maryland State Medical Journal 1965;14:56‐61.

Marciniak 2001

Marciniak CM, Sliwa JA, Heinemann AW, Semik PE. Functional outcomes of persons with brain tumors after inpatient rehabilitation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2001;82(4):457‐63.

Markes 2006

Markes M, Brockow T, Resch KL. Exercise for women receiving adjuvant therapy for breast cancer. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005001.pub2]

McNeely 2010

McNeely ML, Campbell K, Opsina M, Rowe BH, Dabbs K, Klassen TP, et al. Exercise interventions for upper‐limb dysfunction due to breast cancer treatment. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 6. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005211.pub2]

NCCS 2009

NCCS. National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship. http://www.canceradvocacy.org/2009.

Ness 2010

Ness KK, Morris EB, Nolan VG, Howell CR, Gilchrist LS, Stovall M, et al. Physical performance limitations among adult survivors of childhood brain tumors. Cancer 2010;116(12):3034‐44.

Ownsworth 2009

Ownsworth T, Hawkes A, Steginga S, Walker D, Shum D. A biopsychosocial perspective on adjustment and quality of life following brain tumor: a systematic evaluation of the literature. Disability and Rehabilitation 2009;31(13):1038‐55.

O’Dell 1998

O’Dell MW, Barr K, Spanier D, Warnick RE. Functional outcome of inpatient rehabilitation in persons with brain tumors. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1998;79(2):1530‐4.

Pallant 2006

Pallant JF, Misajon R, Bennett E, Manderson L. Measuring the impact and distress of health problems from the individual's perspective: development of the Perceived Impact of Problem Profile (PIPP). Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2006;4(1):36.

Parkin 2005

Parkin DM, Whelan SL, Ferlay J. Cancer incidence in five continents, vol. I to VIII. IARC Cancerbase No 72005:Lyon.

Pirzkall 1998

Pirzkall A, Debus J, Lohr F, Fuss M, Rhein B, Engenhart‐Cabillic R, et al. Radiosurgery alone or in combination with whole‐brain radiotherapy for brain metastases. Journal of Clinical Oncology 1998;16:3563‐9.

Poggi 2009

Poggi G, Liscio M, Pastore V, Adduci A, Galbiati S, Spreafico F, et al. Psychological intervention in young brain tumor survivors: the efficacy of the cognitive behavioural approach. Disability and Rehabilitation 2009;31(13):1066‐73.

RevMan 5 [Computer program]

The Nordic Cochrane Centre,The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). Version 5.1. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre,The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011.

Schag 1991

Schag CA, Ganz PA, Heinrich RL. Cancer rehabilitation evaluation system‐short form (CARES‐SF). Cancer 1991;68:1406‐13.

Sheard 1999

Sheard T, Maguire P. The effect of psychological interventions on anxiety and depression in cancer patients: results of two meta analyses. British Journal of Cancer 1999;80:1770‐80.

Stewart 2002

Stewart L, Burdett S, Glioma Meta‐analysis Trialists Group (GMT). Chemotherapy for high‐grade glioma. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2002, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003913.pub2]

SUTC 2007

Stroke Unit Trialists' Collaboration (SUTC). Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2007, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000197.pub2]

Tang 2008

Tang V, Rathbone M, Park Dorsay J, Jiang S, Harvey D. Rehabilitation in primary and metastatic brain tumours: impact of functional outcomes on survival. Journal of Neurology 2008;255(6):820‐7.

Turk 2001

Turk MA, Scandale J, Rosenbaum PF, Weber RJ. The health of women with cerebral palsy. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America 2001;12(1):153‐68.

Turner Stokes 2005

Turner Stokes L, Disler P, Nair A, Wade DT. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for acquired brain injury in adults of working age. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004170.pub2]

Turner Stokes 2011

Turner Stokes L, Nair A, Sedki I, Disler PB, Wade DT. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for acquired brain injury in adults of working age. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004170.pub2]

Wade 1992

Wade DT. Measurement in Neurological Rehabilitation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.

Ware 1993

Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF‐36 health survey: manual and interpretation guide. Boston, Massachusetts: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center, 1993.

WHO 2001

World Health Organization (WHO). International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health (ICF). Geneva: WHO, 2001.
Table 1. Levels of quality of individual studies

Judgement of risk of bias

Quality rating of study

Risk of bias of all domains low

High methodological quality = ‘high‐quality study’

Unclear or high risk of bias for one or more domains

Low methodological quality = ‘low‐quality study’

High risk of bias for most domains

Very low methodological quality = ‘very low‐quality study’

Figuras y tablas -
Table 1. Levels of quality of individual studies
Table 2. Levels of evidence quality using the GRADE approach

Underlying methodology

Quality rating

Randomised trials or double‐upgraded observational studies

High

Downgraded randomised trials or upgraded observational studies

Moderate

Double‐downgraded randomised trials or observational studies

Low

Triple‐downgraded randomised trials or downgraded observational studies or case series/case reports

Very low

Figuras y tablas -
Table 2. Levels of evidence quality using the GRADE approach