Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Antibioticoterapia de corta duración versus ciclo prolongado para la neumonía adquirida en el hospital en adultos graves

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Contraer todo Desplegar todo

Referencias

Referencias de los estudios incluidos en esta revisión

Bouadma 2010 {published data only}

Bouadma L, Luyt CE, Tubach F, Cracco C, Alvarez A, Schwebel C, et al. Use of procalcitonin to reduce patients' exposure to antibiotics in intensive care units (PRORATA trial): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2010;375(9713):463‐74.

Chastre 2003a {published data only}

Chastre J, Wolff M, Fagon JY, Chevret S, Thomas F, Wermert D, et al. Comparison of 8 vs 15 days of antibiotic therapy for ventilator‐associated pneumonia in adults: a randomized trial. JAMA 2003;290(19):2588‐98.

Fekih Hassen 2009 {published data only}

Fekih Hassen M, Ayed S, Ben Sik Ali H, Gharbi R, Marghli S, Elatrous S. Duration of antibiotic therapy for ventilator‐associated pneumonia: comparison of 7 and 10 days. A pilot study. Annales Françaises d'Anesthésie et de Réanimation 2009;28(1):16‐23.

Medina 2007 {published and unpublished data}

Medina JC, Perez Protto SE, Paciel D, Pontet J, Saldun P, Berro M. Antibiotic treatment for the ventilator‐associated pneumonia: 8 vs. 12 days randomized trial preliminary data. Annual Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Chicago, IL. 2007.

Micek 2004 {published data only}

Micek ST,  Ward S,  Fraser VJ,  Kollef MH. A randomized controlled trial of an antibiotic discontinuation policy for clinically suspected ventilator‐associated pneumonia. Chest 2004;125(5):1791‐9.

Pontet 2007 {published and unpublished data}

Pontet J, Paciel D, Olivera W, Bentancourt S, Cancela M, Gervas J. Procalcitonin (PCT) guided antibiotic treatment in ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP). Multi‐centre, clinical prospective, randomized‐controlled study. American Thoracic Society International Conference, San Francisco, California, USA. 2007:A76.

Singh 2000 {published data only}

Singh N, Rogers P, Atwood CW, Wagener MM, Yu VL. Short‐course empiric antibiotic therapy for patients with pulmonary infiltrates in the intensive care unit. A proposed solution for indiscriminate antibiotic prescription. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2000;162:505‐11.

Stolz 2009a {published and unpublished data}

Stolz D,  Smyrnios N,  Eggimann P,  Pargger H,  Thakkar N,  Siegemund M,  et al. Procalcitonin for reduced antibiotic exposure in ventilator‐associated pneumonia: a randomised study. European Respiratory Journal 2009;34(6):1364‐75.

Referencias de los estudios excluidos de esta revisión

Cai 2001 {published data only}

Cai S, Zhang J, Qian G. Impact of quantitative and qualitative pathogen culture on the outcome of ventilator‐associated pneumonia. Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi 2001;24(8):494‐7.

CCCTG 2006 {published data only}

Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. A randomized trial of diagnostic techniques for ventilator‐associated pneumonia. New England Journal of Medicine 2006;355(25):2619‐30.

Chastre 2003b {published data only}

Chastre J, Wolff M, Fagon JY, Chevret S. Comparison of two durations of antibiotic therapy to treat ventilator‐associated pneumonia (VAP). American Thoracic Society Meeting, Seattle, Washington. 2003:A015.

Fagon 2000 {published data only}

Fagon JY, Chastre J, Wolff M, Gervais C, Parer‐Aubas S, Stéphan F, et al. Invasive and noninvasive strategies for management of suspected ventilator‐associated pneumonia. A randomized trial. Annals of Internal Medicine 2000;132(8):621‐30.

Hochreiter 2009 {published data only (unpublished sought but not used)}

Hochreiter M,  Köhler T,  Schweiger AM,  Keck FS,  Bein B,  von Spiegel T,  et al. Procalcitonin to guide duration of antibiotic therapy in intensive care patients: a randomized prospective controlled trial. Critical Care 2009;13(3):R83.

Ibrahim 2001 {published data only}

Ibrahim EH,  Ward S,  Sherman G,  Schaiff R,  Fraser VJ,  Kollef MH. Experience with a clinical guideline for the treatment of ventilator‐associated pneumonia. Critical Care Medicine 2001;29(6):1109‐15.

Kim 2009 {published data only}

Kim JW, Chung J, Jang HJ, Hong SB, Lim CM, Koh Y. De‐escalation of antibiotics in critically ill patients with hospital‐acquired pneumonia. Respirology 2009;14:A129.

Kollef 2005 {published data only}

Kollef MH,  Kollef KE. Antibiotic utilization and outcomes for patients with clinically suspected ventilator‐associated pneumonia and negative quantitative BAL culture results. Chest 2005;128:2706‐13.

Maldonado‐Ortiz 2004 {published data only (unpublished sought but not used)}

Maldonado‐Ortiz EA, Niederman MS, Nacul F, Rodríguez A, Ceballos S, Osorio J. How long is enough to treat ventilator associated pneumonia? A randomized pilot study: the Latinoamerican experience. Chest 2004;126(Suppl 4):717.

Nobre 2008 {published data only}

Nobre V, Harbarth S, Graf JD, Rohner P, Pugin J. Use of procalcitonin to shorten antibiotic treatment duration in septic patients: a randomized trial. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2008;177(5):498‐505.

Peery 2001 {published data only}

Peery C, Chendrasekhar A, Moorman DW, Timberlake GA. Ventilator‐associated pneumonia therapy: protected specimen brushing versus tracheal aspirate data. Journal of Applied Research 2001;1(2):1.

Rello 2004 {published data only}

Rello J,  Vidaur L,  Sandiumenge A,  Rodríguez A,  Gualis B,  Boque C,  et al. De‐escalation therapy in ventilator‐associated pneumonia. Critical Care Medicine 2004;32(11):2183‐90.

Sanchez‐Nieto 1998 {published data only}

Sanchez‐Nieto JM, Torres A, Garcia‐Cordoba F, El‐Ebiary M, Carrillo A, Ruiz J, et al. Impact of invasive and noninvasive quantitative culture sampling on outcome of ventilator‐associated pneumonia: a pilot study. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 1998;157(2):371‐6.

Schroeder 2007 {published data only (unpublished sought but not used)}

Schroeder S,  Hochreiter M,  Koehler T,  Schweiger AM,  Bein B,  Keck FS,  et al. Procalcitonin (PCT)‐guided algorithm reduces length of antibiotic treatment in surgical intensive care patients with severe sepsis: results of a prospective randomized study. Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 2009;394:221‐6.

Singh 1998 {published data only}

Singh N. Short‐course empiric antibiotic therapy for suspected nosocomial pneumonia: a proposed solution for indiscriminate antibiotic prescription for pulmonary infiltrates in the ICU. Annual Meeting of the Infectious Disease Society of America, Denver, Colorado. 1998.

Sole 2000 {published data only}

Sole VJ, Fernandez JA, Benitez AB, Cardenosa Cendrero JA, Rodriguez de CF. Impact of quantitative invasive diagnostic techniques in the management and outcome of mechanically ventilated patients with suspected pneumonia. Critical Care Medicine 2000;28(8):2737‐41.

Stolz 2009b {published data only}

Stolz D, Smyrnios N, Eggimann P, Pargger H, Thakkar N, Siegemund M, et al. Procalcitonin for antibiotic de‐escalation in ventilator associated pneumonia ‐ a randomized study. European Resiratory Society Annual Congress, Vienna. 2009:2798.

Svoboda 2007 {published data only}

Svoboda P,  Kantorová I,  Scheer P,  Radvanova J,  Radvan M. Can procalcitonin help us in timing of re‐intervention in septic patients after multiple trauma or major surgery?. Hepatogastroenterology 2007;54:359‐63.

Wolff 2003 {published data only}

Wolff M, Chastre J, Fagon JY, Chevret S. Comparison of two durations of antibiotic therapy for ventilator‐associated pneumonia (VAP) caused by non‐fermenting gram negative bacilli (NF‐GNB). American Thoracic Society Meeting Seattle, Washington. 2003:A860.

Referencias de los estudios en curso

NCT00934011 {unpublished data only}

Comparative study of C‐reactive protein versus procalcitonin to guide antibiotic therapy in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock admitted to the Intensive Care Unit. Ongoing studySeptember 2009.

NCT00987818 {unpublished data only}

Reduction of antibiotic use in the ICU: procalcitonin guided versus conventional antibiotic therapy in patients with sepsis in the ICU. Ongoing studyOctober 2009.

PASS {unpublished data only}

The procalcitonin and survival study (PASS). Ongoing study In progress.

Pro‐SEPS {unpublished data only}

Randomised multicenter prospective study of procalcitonin‐guided treatment on antibiotic use and outcome in severe sepsis ICU patients without obvious infection. Ongoing studyDecember 2007.

SAPS {unpublished data only}

Safety and efficacy of procalcitonin guided antibiotic therapy in adult intensive care units (ICU's) (SAPS). Ongoing studyNovember 2009.

SISPCT {unpublished data only}

Placebo‐controlled trial of sodium selenite and procalcitonin guided antimicrobial therapy in severe sepsis (SISPCT). Ongoing studyNovember 2009.

ATS/IDSA 2005

American Thoracic Society, Infectious Diseases Society of America. Guidelines for the management of adults with hospital‐acquired, ventilator‐associated, and healthcare‐associated pneumonia. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2005;171(4):388‐416.

Bignardi 1998

Bignardi GE. Risk factors for Clostridium difficile infection. Journal of Hospital Infection 1998;40(1):1‐15.

BSAC 2008

Masterton RG,  Galloway A,  French G,  Street M,  Armstrong J,  Brown E,  et al. Guidelines for the management of hospital‐acquired pneumonia in the UK: report of the working party on hospital‐acquired pneumonia of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2008;62(1):5‐34.

Chastre 2002

Chastre J, Fagon JY. Ventilator‐associated pneumonia. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2002;165:867‐903.

Combes 2007

Combes A, Luyt CE, Fagon JY, Wolff M, Trouillet JL, Chastre J. Early predictors for infection recurrence and death in patients with ventilator‐associated pneumonia. Critical Care Medicine 2007;35(1):146‐54.

Dennesen 2001

Dennesen PJ, van der Ven AJ, Kessels AG, Ramsay G, Bonten MJ. Resolution of infectious parameters after antimicrobial therapy in patients with ventilator‐associated pneumonia. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2001;163(6):1371‐5.

Dugan 2003

Dugan HA, MacLaren R, Jung R. Duration of antimicrobial therapy for nosocomial pneumonia: possible strategies for minimizing antimicrobial use in intensive care units. Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics 2003;28(2):123‐9.

El Solh 2007

El Solh AA, Choi G, Schultz MJ, Pineda LA, Mankowski C. Clinical and hemostatic responses to treatment in ventilator‐associated pneumonia: role of bacterial pathogens. Critical Care Medicine 2007;35(2):490‐6.

Grammatikos 2008

Grammatikos AP, Siempos II, Michalopoulos A, Falagas ME. Optimal duration of the antimicrobial treatment of ventilator‐acquired pneumonia. Expert Review of Anti‐infective Therapy 2008;6(6):861‐6.

Higgins 2002

Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis. Statistics in Medicine 2002;21:1539‐58.

Kohlenberg 2010

Kohlenberg A, Schwab F, Behnke M, Geffers C, Gastmeier P. Pneumonia associated with invasive and noninvasive ventilation: an analysis of the German nosocomial infection surveillance system database. Intensive Care Medicine 2010;36(6):971‐8.

Kollef 1995

Kollef MH, Silver P, Murphy DM, Trovillion E. The effect of late‐onset ventilator‐associated pneumonia in determining patient mortality. Chest 1995;108(6):1655‐62.

Kopterides 2010

Kopterides P, Siempos II, Tsangaris I, Tsantes A, Armaganidis A. Procalcitonin‐guided algorithms of antibiotic therapy in the intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials. Critical Care Medicine 2010;38(11):2229‐41.

Lefebvre 2011

Lefebvre C, Manheimer E, Glanville J. Chapter 6. Searching for studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org. Chichester, UK: Wiley‐Blackwell, 2011.

Luna 2003

Luna CM,  Blanzaco D,  Niederman MS,  Matarucco W,  Baredes NC,  Desmery P,  et al. Resolution of ventilator‐associated pneumonia: prospective evaluation of the clinical pulmonary infection score as an early clinical predictor of outcome. Critical Care Medicine 2003;31(3):676‐82.

Mueller 2007

Mueller EW,  Croce MA,  Boucher BA,  Hanes SD,  Wood GC,  Swanson JM,  et al. Repeat bronchoalveolar lavage to guide antibiotic duration for ventilator‐associated pneumonia. Journal of Trauma 2007;63(6):1329‐37.

Pepin 2005

Pépin J,  Saheb N,  Coulombe MA,  Alary ME,  Corriveau MP,  Authier S,  et al. Emergence of fluoroquinolones as the predominant risk factor for Clostridium difficile‐associated diarrhea: a cohort study during an epidemic in Quebec. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2005;41(9):1254‐60.

ProBac

ProBac ‐ use of procalcitonin level as part of a decision tree to discontinue antibiotics when started empirically in the ICU in hemodynamically stable patients with no site of infection identified (Terminated). http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00407147 (date accessed 20 April 2011).

Rello 2002

Rello J, Ollendorf DA, Oster G, Vera‐Llonch M, Bellm L, Redman R, et al. Epidemiology and outcomes of ventilator‐associated pneumonia in a large US database. Chest 2002;122:2115‐21.

RevMan 2011 [Computer program]

The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). Version 5.1. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011.

Richards 2000

Richards MJ, Edwards JR, Culver DH, Gaynes RP. Nosocomial infections in combined medical‐surgical intensive care units in the United States. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 2000;21(8):510‐5.

Rotstein 2008

Rotstein C, Evans G, Born A, Grossman R, Light RB, Magder S, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for hospital‐acquired pneumonia and ventilator‐associated pneumonia in adults. Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology 2008;19(1):19‐53.

Safdar 2005

Safdar N, Dezfulian C, Collard HR, Saint S. Clinical and economic consequences of ventilator‐associated pneumonia: a systematic review. Critical Care Medicine 2005;33:2184‐93.

Stern 2011

Sterne JAC, Egger M, Moher D (editors). Chapter 10: Addressing reporting biases. In: Higgins JPT, Green S editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org. Chichester: The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011.

Vincent 1995

Vincent JL,  Bihari DJ,  Suter PM,  Bruining HA,  White J,  Nicolas‐Chanoin MH,  et al. The prevalence of nosocomial infection in intensive care units in Europe. Results of the European Prevalence of Infection in Intensive Care (EPIC) Study. EPIC International Advisory Committee. JAMA 1995;274(8):639‐44.

Vincent 2009

Vincent JL,  Rello J,  Marshall J,  Silva E,  Anzueto A,  Martin CD,  et al. International study of the prevalence and outcomes of infection in intensive care units. JAMA 2009;302(21):2323‐9.

Visscher 2008

Visscher S, Schurink CA, Melsen WG, Lucas PJ, Bonten MJ. Effects of systemic antibiotic therapy on bacterial persistence in the respiratory tract of mechanically ventilated patients. Intensive Care Medicine 2008;34(4):692‐9.

Zhuo 2008

Zhuo H, Yang K, Lynch SV, Dotson RH, Glidden DV, Singh G, et al. Increased mortality of ventilated patients with endotracheal Pseudomonas aeruginosa without clinical signs of infection. Critical Care Medicine 2008;36(9):2495‐503.

Characteristics of studies

Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]

Bouadma 2010

Methods

The PRORATA study. A multi‐centre study based in France. Unblinded, randomised controlled trial comparing strategy utilising serum procalcitonin measurement to guide initiation and cessation of antibiotics for ICU patients with suspected bacterial infection, with antibiotic administration according to an agreed guideline

Participants

630 adult ICU patients (8 medical, surgical or medical‐surgical ICUs; 6 hospitals). Mean age was 62; 66% male; SAPS II 47; SOFA score 7.8) with suspected bacterial infection (either at admission or during ICU stay). 89% patients were medical.16% enrolled patients were defined as being "Immunocompromised" (including patients with AIDS, solid organ transplant, haematological malignancy, prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy, and long‐term corticosteroid or other immunosuppressant therapy); identifying and excluding data from these patients for the purpose of the systematic review was not possible. There appear not to have been significant differences in baseline characteristics between treatment groups. Of 621 patients entered into the analysis, 214 (34%) had VAP or "HAP": 141 (23%) patients were diagnosed with VAP, and 73 (12%) patients had HAP not requiring mechanical ventilation. For all patients with microbiologically‐confirmed infection, initial antibiotic therapy was appropriate in 92% cases. Diagnostic criteria for VAP and HAP were not provided in the full‐text article

Exclusions: pregnancy, expected ICU stay < 3 days, bone marrow transplant or chemotherapy‐induced neutropenia, infections requiring long‐term course antibiotic therapy (e.g. infective endocarditis), poor chance of survival (SAPS II > 65), DNR order

Interventions

Patients randomised to intervention group (311 randomised; 4 withdrew consent; 307 included in analysis; 75 patients with VAP; 29 with HAP not requiring mechanical ventilation) had serum procalcitonin level measured at inclusion, at each infectious episode until day 28, and for every morning that antibiotics were administered. The guidance for withholding or stopping antibiotic therapy was: i. antibiotics to be withheld when procalcitonin was < 0.5 µg/L on day of study entry; ii. antibiotics to be discontinued when procalcitonin level had fallen to < 0.5 µg/L or to less than 20% of the peak procalcitonin concentration

For patients randomised to control group (319 randomised; 4 withdrew; 1 randomised twice; 314 included in analysis; 66 patients with VAP; 44 patients with HAP not requiring mechanical ventilation), physicians were encouraged to administer antibiotics according to agreed recommendations (including duration of therapy)

Outcomes

Most outcome data were presented for all patients, without specific reference to patients with VAP or HAP (non‐ventilated)

For all patients, the following outcomes were presented:

  • Mortality (28‐day and 60‐day)

  • Number of days without antibiotics (28‐day)

  • Relapse or superinfection (28‐day)

  • Mechanical ventilation‐free days (28‐day)

  • SOFA scores (Days 1, 7, 14, 21 and 28)

  • Duration of stay in ICU

  • Duration of stay in hospital

  • Days of exposure to each antibiotic per 1000 patient days

  • Number of days of continuous antibiotic treatment (28‐day)

  • Duration of antibiotic treatment according to infection site

  • Percentage of emerging multi‐drug resistant bacteria isolated from routine microbiological assessment (28‐day)

For patients specifically with VAP, the following outcomes were presented:

  • Duration of first episode of antibiotic treatment

  • Number of days without antibiotics (28‐day)

  • Mortality (28‐day)

Notes

Procalcitonin measurements were used to guide whether to initiate antibiotic therapy as well as when to discontinue therapy. A very low proportion of recruited patients were surgical, which may limit generalisability of results. There was a high incidence of protocol non‐adherence; the algorithm for antimicrobial therapy administration was not followed (overall) in 162 patients (53%) in the intervention group, nor for 141 patients in the control group (45%). For all patients, a non‐significant increase in 60‐day mortality was observed in the procalcitonin group (92/307 (30%) versus 82/ 314 (26.1%)] in the control group). Furthermore, the study may have been under‐powered to determine non‐inferiority of PCT‐guided therapy in terms of death, since it was based upon a 35% absolute mortality in the control group and a 10% between‐group mortality difference. For all patients, in the procalcitonin group there were non‐significantly greater relapse rates (20/ 307 (6.5%) versus 16/ 314 (5.1%) in control group; P = 0.45) and superinfection rates (106/ 307 (34.5%) versus 97/ 314 (30.9%) in the control group; P = 0.29)

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

"Independent, centralised, computer‐generated randomisation sequence... was used to randomly assign patients."

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

"Investigators were masked to assignment before... randomisation."

Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes

High risk

Unblinded study

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

2 patients lost to follow‐up, 1 from intervention and 1 from control group. This is unlikely to have a clinically relevant impact

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

Unclear

Other bias

High risk

The algorithm for antimicrobial therapy administration was not followed (overall) in 162 patients (53%) for the intervention group, nor for 141 patients in the control group (45%)

Chastre 2003a

Methods

The PNEUMA study, a multi‐centre study based in France. Unblinded, randomised controlled trial comparing fixed durations (8‐day versus 15‐day) of antibiotic therapy for VAP. Randomisation occurred 3 days after bronchoscopy confirming diagnosis of VAP

Participants

401 adult patients. 51 French ICUs. 72% male; mean age 61; episodes due to NF‐GNB 32.5%, MRSA 11.2%; mean SAPS II score 45; mean SOFA score 7.4 at admission. VAP was diagnosed according to the following criteria: new and persistent radiographic infiltrate, plus 1 of: purulent tracheal secretions, temperature of 38.4 °C or higher, or leukocyte count > 10,000/µL; and positive quantitative culture of 104 cfu/mL from BAL or 103 cfu/mL from PSB. Duration of mechanical ventilation prior to VAP: 13.6 days. No significant differences between groups at baseline, with the exception of significantly higher proportion of men (76.6%) in 8‐day regimen versus men in 15‐day regimen (67.6%; P = 0.046). All patients received appropriate initial antibiotics. Exclusions included early onset pneumonia (within 5 days of commencing mechanical ventilation) in patients who had received no antimicrobial therapy in the 15 days prior to diagnosis of pneumonia, and immunocompromised state, characterised by: neutropenia, AIDS, long‐term corticosteroids or other immunosuppressant therapy

Interventions

197 patients received fixed 8‐day course of antibiotics (chosen by treating physician); 204 patients received a 15‐day course

Outcomes

The following outcome measures were reported:

  • Death from any cause (28‐day and 60‐day)

  • Microbiologically‐confirmed pulmonary infection recurrence (28‐day)

  • Antibiotic‐free days (28‐day)

  • Mechanical ventilation‐free days (28‐day)

  • Number of organ failure‐free days (28‐day)

  • Evolution of parameters comprising the SOFA score and ODIN score (Day 1 to 28)

  • Clinical features relevant to pulmonary infection (fever, leukocyte count, PaO2/ FiO2 ratio, radiologic score; Day 1 to 28)

  • Duration of stay ITU

  • Rate of unfavourable outcome (death, recurrence, prescription of new antibiotic therapy)

  • In‐hospital mortality

  • Percentage of emerging multiresistant bacteria during ITU in bronchoscopic samples collected to investigate possible recurrence

Notes

Repeat bronchoscopy was performed on the basis of fever, purulent secretions, new or progressive pulmonary infiltrates, or deterioration in respiratory or haemodynamic parameters. It was not performed routinely, e.g. on completion of 8‐day course of therapy, and consequently data regarding persistent colonisation with NF‐GNB is not available

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

"Randomisation was performed...and stratified... according to a computer‐generated random‐number table."

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

"Randomisation performed centrally, using an interactive voice system... randomisation was not communicated to the investigators until day 8... On that day, investigators had to telephone the randomisation centre to receive the treatment assignment by fax."

Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes

High risk

"...Patients, medical and nursing staffs, and pharmacists remained blinded until [day 8]." However, importantly, no attempt was made to blind from day 8, i.e. the point from which thereafter allocation might make a significant difference

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Following randomisation, 0 patients were lost to follow‐up. 1 patient excluded from analysis following withdrawal of consent

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

Study protocol not available for examination. However, outcome measures are those expected and appropriately presented within the report

Other bias

Low risk

There was a significantly higher proportion of men in the 8‐day group (76.6%) compared with the 15‐day group (67.6%; P = 0.046). However, there were not significant differences in illness severity scores, prior duration of mechanical ventilation, prior antibiotic administration, micro‐organisms responsible for VAP, and antibiotic regimes to treat VAP

Data regarding proportions of patients who contrary to protocol did not receive a full 8‐day or 15‐day course of antibiotics are not provided. However, absolute antibiotic‐treatment days and 28‐day antibiotic‐free day data indicates significantly less antibiotic exposure as a consequence of allocation to short or prolonged‐course therapy

Fekih Hassen 2009

Methods

Single‐centre study based in Tunisia. RCT comparing fixed durations (7‐day versus 10‐day) of antibiotic therapy for VAP

Participants

Medical ICU. 30 adult patients (63% male; mean age 63 years; NF‐GNB 72%; SAPS II 42.4). VAP (onset more than 48 hours after mechanical ventilation in ICU) diagnosed was suspected on the basis of: new and persistent radiographic infiltrate, purulent secretions, fever or deteriorating gas exchange or white cell count and confirmed on quantitative analysis of culture of endotracheal aspirate (> 104 cfu/ml) or protected distal respiratory specimens (>103 cfu/ml). Mean onset of VAP after institution of mechanical ventilation: 10 days. Initial antibiotics were appropriate in 94% of cases. No significant differences in baseline characteristics between the 2 groups

Exclusions include: second episode of pneumonia during single hospitalisation, terminal illness, failure to isolate bacterial growth

30 patients randomised from 39 patients with clinical features of VAP: 9 not enrolled because of terminal illness or failure to isolate bacteria

Interventions

14 patients randomised to receive 7‐day course of antibiotics; 16 patients to receive 16‐day course. Choice of antibiotic: on microbiology advice, taking into account whether early (up to including 5 days after commencing mechanical ventilation) or late‐onset VAP, and whether risk factors for multi‐resistant bacteria present, and modified according to culture/sensitivity results

94% patients received appropriate initial antibiotic therapy

Outcomes

The following outcome measures were presented:

  • Mortality (14‐day and 28‐day)

  • Antibiotic‐free days (28‐day)

  • Microbiological resolution (timescale not specified)

  • CPIS resolution (days 1, 10, 14)

  • Mechanical ventilation‐free days (28‐day)

  • Recurrence: relapse or super‐infection (timescale not specified)

  • Duration of ITU stay

Notes

Data regarding protocol violations and patients lost to follow‐up not available. Unable to make contact trial with authors to request supplementary information

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

Use of random number table

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Inadequately reported

Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Inadequately reported

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Inadequately reported

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

Inadequately reported

Other bias

Low risk

No evidence of other source of bias

Medina 2007

Methods

2 centre study, based in Uruguay, conducted May 2003 to December 2006 (during the period December 2005 to April 2006 recruitment was interrupted while eligible patients were enrolled in the Pontet 2007 study). Randomised controlled study comparing fixed short (8‐day) and long (12‐day) courses of antibiotic therapy for VAP.

Participants

77 patients (medical, surgical and neurosurgical; mean age 59 years, 53% male, 63.6% NF‐GNB, 9.1% MRSA; median APACHE II score 21, MODS score 5, SOFA score 6) with VAP. VAP was diagnosed on the basis of: new and persistent radiographic infiltrates, 2 of temperature ≥38.5 ºC or <36 ºC, leukocytes ≥12,000/ mm3 or ≤ 4 x103/ mm3, and BAL culture ≥ 104 cfu/ml, or positive ETA plus CPIS > 6, or micro‐organism in ≥ 2 blood cultures with identical sensitivity to tracheal secretions and in absence of other possible infection, or positive culture of pleural fluid. Mean time after commencing mechanical ventilation before onset of VAP: 9.3 days. 68% patients had received a prior course of antibiotics. In 97% cases, initial antibiotic therapy for VAP was appropriate. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between treatment groups
Exclusion criteria: failure to meet clinical and microbiological criteria, decision not to institute antibiotic therapy, duration of therapy < 6 days, death before 6th day of treatment, onset of VAP within 48 hours of admission from other centre

Interventions

77 patients randomised to 8‐day treatment or 12‐day course on Day 8 of antibiotic therapy. Antibiotic choice was that of the attending physician; in 75/77 (97%) cases, initial antibiotic therapy was appropriate. The most commonly used antibiotics were: cefoperazone‐sulbactam, carbapenem and other third‐generation cephalosporins. In 51% cases, antibiotic combinations were used

Outcomes

The following outcomes were studied:

  • ITU mortality

  • VAP‐related mortality

  • Clinical resolution of VAP

  • Non‐resolution of VAP ("Therapeutic failure")

  • Recurrence of VAP

  • Duration of mechanical ventilation

Notes

0 patients were lost to follow‐up. No patient received a shorter duration of antibiotic therapy than allocated; data incomplete for patients who had antibiotics continued beyond the allocated duration

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

Block randomisation using random number table

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

Sealed, numbered envelopes opened sequentially

Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes

High risk

Unblinded study

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

No patients lost to follow‐up

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

Unclear. Data incomplete for patients who had antibiotics continued beyond the allocated duration

Other bias

Low risk

Study appears to be free of other sources of bias

Micek 2004

Methods

Single‐centre, medical ICU from USA. Randomised controlled study comparing strategy involving discontinuation policy to decrease antibiotic administration for VAP with standard‐therapy

Participants

302 patients receiving antibiotic treatment for VAP were randomised. VAP was diagnosed on the basis of: new persistent radiographic infiltrates together with one of: positive pleural culture (same organism as in sputum/tracheal aspirate), radiographic cavitation, histopathologic evidence of pneumonia, or 2 of: fever, leukocytosis and purulent tracheal aspirate or sputum. Mean age 60 years; 50% male; 29% COPD; APACHE II score 23; mean CPIS 7.1; Pseudomonas or Acinetobacter infection 11%; MRSA 20%. 25% patients had received prior antibiotics. Proportion of patients receiving appropriate initial antibiotic therapy was 94% overall. 18.6% patients were defined as "Immunosuppressed". No significant differences in baseline characteristics between groups

Exclusions: transfers to host institution because of lack of capacity at external institutions

Interventions

154 patients randomised to discontinuation group; one of investigators recommended discontinuation of antibiotics to treating physician on weekdays if: non‐infectious cause for radiographic infiltrates identified, signs and symptoms of active infection had resolved (in terms of temperature, white cell count, radiographic appearance, sputum characteristics and PaO2/ FiO2 ratio). 148 patients were randomised to the control group. Recommendations regarding choice of antibiotic therapy were made to both groups

Outcomes

Reported outcome measures:

  • Duration of antibiotic therapy for VAP

  • ITU mortality

  • Hospital mortality

  • Duration of ITU stay

  • Duration of hospital stay

  • Duration of mechanical ventilation

  • VAP recurrence during same ITU stay

Notes

Outcome data was missing for 4 patients in the intervention group, and for 8 patients in the control group. Among intervention group, recommendations to discontinue antibiotics were given to the physicians of 142 patients (94.7%); among 88.7% of these patients antibiotics were discontinued within 48 hours of the recommendation. Trial author contacted, but no further information available

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

No details provided

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

No details provided

Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes

High risk

Intervention involved investigators contacting the physician team

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

High risk

Outcome data missing in 12/302 (4%) cases; no information given regarding missing outcome data

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

Unclear

Other bias

Low risk

There do not appear to be other major potential sources of bias

Pontet 2007

Methods

4‐centre Uruguayan study, conducted December 2005 to April 2006; 2 of these centres also recruited to the study Medina 2007, but outside this time period. Unblinded, randomised controlled study comparing PCT‐guided strategy for antibiotic cessation versus standard therapy for VAP

Participants

81 adult patients (medical, surgical, cardiothoracic and neurosurgical; mean age 54 years, 63% male; NF‐GNB 23.4%; MRSA 6.1%; Day 1 MODS 6.2; Day 1 SOFA score 4.8) with suspected VAP. VAP was diagnosed on the basis of: new and persistent radiographic infiltrates, 2 of temperature ≥ 38.5 ºC or < 36 ºC, leukocytes ≥12,000/ mm3 or ≤ 4 x103/ mm3, and BAL culture ≥ 104 cfu/ml, or positive ETA plus CPIS > 6, or micro‐organism in ≥ 2 blood cultures with identical sensitivity to tracheal secretions and in absence of other possible infection, or positive culture of pleural fluid. Patients were excluded on the basis of: AIDS, leukaemia or immunosuppression. A further 14 patients were excluded after randomisation; from control group, 5 patients were excluded because of short duration of treatment (3 patients) or negative BAL (3 patients); from the PCT group, 9 patients were excluded post‐randomisation because Day 1 or 2 PCT was < 0.5 ng/mL. There were no significant baseline differences between groups in terms of demographics, underlying disease or prior antibiotic administration

Interventions

Intervention: for the group receiving PCT‐guided therapy; if at day 7 PCT was < 0.5 ng/ml, antibiotic discontinuation was encouraged. Duration of therapy in control group was according to pre‐existing guidelines in place at each ICU. Choice of antibiotic therapy was that of the treating physician. Most commonly used antibiotics were: cephalosporins, ampicillin‐sulbactam and amikacin; antibiotic combinations were used in 54.5% cases

Outcomes

Data are presented as a per‐protocol analysis. The following outcome measures were reported:

  • ITU mortality

  • VAP‐related ITU mortality

  • Duration of mechanical ventilation

  • Duration of ITU stay

  • Non‐resolution (therapeutic failure)

  • Relapse (Day 29)

  • Super‐infection (Day 29)

  • Clinical resolution

  • CPIS (Day 1, 7)

  • MODS (Day 1, 7)

  • SOFA score (Day 1, 7)

Notes

All patients in the procalcitonin group completed at least 7 days of antibiotic therapy. At Day 7, antibiotics were discontinued for all patients with procalcitonin < 0.5 ng/ml

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

Block randomisation using random number table

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

Sealed, numbered envelopes opened in sequence

Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes

High risk

Treating team were made aware of assignment on Day 7, when PCT measured and communicated to PCT group

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

No patients lost to follow‐up

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

Unclear

Other bias

High risk

Potential source of bias as this is a per‐protocol analysis; exclusion of 9 patients with low PCT measurements in the PCT group may exclude a higher proportion of relatively well patients compared with the control group

Singh 2000

Methods

Single‐centre study from the USA. Randomised controlled trial comparing strategy of 3 days' ciprofloxacin monotherapy versus standard therapy (duration and antibiotic choice at the discretion of physician) for patients with pulmonary infiltrates but low‐probability pneumonia

Participants

Study entry criteria: new‐onset pulmonary infiltrate associated with possible nosocomial pneumonia. Modified Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score (CPIS) < 7 on Day 1 (suggesting low probability pneumonia)

81 adult medical and surgical ICU patients; 47 (58%) receiving mechanical ventilation; mean age 66.7 years; no data on sex. APACHE III score 41.8; mean CPIS 4.9. Prior mean duration of ICU stay 8.8 days and duration of mechanical ventilation 7.6 days. Chronic obstructive airways disease present in 27% cases. 5% patients were transplant recipients. With the exception of abnormal respiration (92% experimental group versus 71% standard‐therapy group, P = 0.016), there were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the 2 groups

Exclusions: HIV, chemotherapy‐induced neutropenia, concurrent antibiotic administration (other than surgical prophylaxis), flouroquinolone allergy

Interventions

Randomised at Day 1 of episode of possible pneumonia. Intervention group (N = 39): 3 days' ciprofloxacin monotherapy. At Day 3 if CPIS < 7, antibiotics would be discontinued; if CPIS > 6, therapy would be continued, with choice of agent and duration of therapy at the discretion of treating physician, and incorporating microbiology results

Standard therapy (N = 42): choice and duration of antibiotic therapy at choice of treating physician

Outcomes

The following outcomes were reported:

  • Mortality (Day 3, 14, 30)

  • Duration of ITU stay

  • Emergence of antimicrobial resistance or superinfection (Day 28)

  • Duration of antibiotic therapy

  • Antimicrobial therapy cost

Notes

Pathogens associated with possible HAP were incompletely presented

For patients allocated to the short‐course therapy, 0 patients with CPIS < 7 at Day 3 had antibiotics continued beyond 72 hours

A significant decrease in duration of therapy in "Standard therapy" group was observed with time (P = 0.0001), thought to be a result of unblinded nature of study. The study was terminated by institutional review board as it was deemed "unethical to continue study."

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Randomisation process not described

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Randomisation/concealment not described

Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes

High risk

This was an unblinded study

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

No missing outcome data

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

High risk

The components of the composite measure of "emergence of antimicrobial resistance or superinfection" are not reported

Other bias

High risk

Stopped early by institutional review board. Results for patients managed in "experimental" group appear to have influenced management of patients subsequently allocated to "standard therapy group"

Stolz 2009a

Methods

The ProVAP study, an international, multi‐centre study involving 7 ICUs in USA and Switzerland. Unblinded, randomised controlled trial comparing strategy utilising serum procalcitonin measurement to guide discontinuation of antibiotics for ICU patients with VAP, with antibiotic administration according to an agreed guideline

Participants

101 patients with VAP; 36% NF‐GNB; 10% MRSA; mean age 56; 75% male; 27% surgical patients; 19% with chronic obstructive airways disease. Mean SAPS II score 43; ODIN score 2.1; SOFA score 7.8. Mean duration of mechanical ventilation before onset of VAP 6 days. 75% received antibiotics during the 14 days before VAP. 89% patients had CPIS ≥ 6.ODIN score was slightly higher in the control group than the procalcitonin group (2.3 versus 1.9; P = 0.042); otherwise, there were no significant differences in baseline characteristics. VAP diagnosed according to clinical criteria: new or persistent infiltrates on chest radiography with at least 2 of purulent tracheal secretions, temperature > 38 ºC, leukocyte count > 11,000/ µL or < 3000/ µL; microbiological confirmation was not an essential criterion, and indeed was absent in 27% patients. Exclusions: treatment with immunosuppressants or long‐term corticosteroid treatment; or underlying immunosuppressant disorder; co‐existing extrapulmonary infection

Interventions

101 patients were randomised on day of diagnosis of VAP (Day 0). Serum procalcitonin levels were measured from Day 0 to Day 10 for all patients (including patients in the control group). For the 51 patients in the intervention group, discontinuation of antibiotic therapy was encouraged according to an algorithm 72 hours (Day 2) after randomisation if PCT was < 0.5 µg/L or had decreased to 20% or less of level on Day 0

For the 50 patients randomised to the control group, procalcitonin levels were withheld, and duration of therapy was determined by treating physician

In both intervention and control groups, choice of antibiotic therapy was that of the attending physician

Outcomes

The following outcome measures were reported:

  • Mortality (Day 28)

  • In‐hospital mortality

  • Duration of antibiotic therapy

  • Antibiotic‐free days (Day 28)

  • Mechanical ventilation‐free days (Day 28)

  • Duration of hospital stay

  • Number of ITU‐free days alive (Day 28)

  • Clinical features associated with respiratory infection

  • PaO2/ FiO2

  • SOFA score

  • ODIN score

  • CPIS

Notes

It is unclear how many patients were treated with antibiotics beyond the point at which discontinuation was advocated by the protocol

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

"Arbitrary allocation to... treatment assignments based on sealed, opaque envelopes."

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

"Treating physicians were not aware of envelope contents before randomisation."

Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes

High risk

Not blinded

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

No patients lost to follow‐up

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

High risk

Complete data on numbers of patients for whom physicians violate (PCT) protocol not presented

Other bias

Low risk

There appear not to be other major potential sources of bias

APACHE II score: Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score
BAL: broncho‐alveolar lavage
cfu/ml: colony‐forming units per millilitre
COPD: chronic obstructive airways disease
CPIS: clinical pulmonary infection score
DNR order: do not resuscitate order
ETA: endo‐tracheal aspirate
FiO2: fraction of inspired oxygen (in a gas mixture)
HAP: hospital‐acquired pneumonia
ICU: intensive care unit
ITU: intensive therapy unit
MODS: multiple organ dysfunction score
MRSA: methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus
NF‐GNB: non‐fermenting Gram‐negative bacilli
ODIN: organ dysfunction and/or infection score
PaO2: partial pressure of oxygen
PCT: procalcitonin
PSB: protected specimen brush
SAPS II: Simplified Acute Physiology Score II
SOFA score: Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score
VAP: ventilator‐associated pneumonia

Characteristics of excluded studies [ordered by study ID]

Study

Reason for exclusion

Cai 2001

A randomised controlled study investigating diagnostic strategies (quantitative versus qualitative culture of respiratory tract specimens) on outcome from VAP

CCCTG 2006

This 2‐by‐2 factorial randomised controlled study aiming to compare: i. invasive and non‐invasive diagnostic strategies for diagnosis of VAP, and ii. initial empiric treatment with meropenem or meropenem plus ciprofloxacin for suspected VAP. There was no significant difference in number of antibiotic‐free days between groups of patients allocated to invasive or non‐invasive strategies

Chastre 2003b

Data subsequently published in full (Chastre 2003a)

Fagon 2000

This was a randomised study designed to compare strategies for diagnosis and selection of initial antimicrobial therapy of VAP, not duration of therapy. For groups of patients randomised to both invasive and non‐invasive diagnostic strategies, recommended duration of therapy in the presence of positive respiratory culture (i.e. confirmed pneumonia) was 14 days

Hochreiter 2009

This was a randomised controlled study comparing a strategy using serial procalcitonin (PCT) measurement to guide discontinuation of antibiotic therapy for treatment of sepsis in 110 surgical intensive care patients with standard therapy. Of these patients, 43 had "pneumonia"; it is unclear what proportion had nosocomial or community‐acquired pneumonia, and what proportion of patients was receiving mechanical ventilation at time of diagnosis. Duration of antibiotic therapy was significantly shorter in the intervention (PCT‐guided) group (5.9 +/‐ 1.7 days versus 7.9 +/‐ 0.5 days), but outcome data relevant to this systematic review are restricted to duration of ITU stay and hospital mortality

Ibrahim 2001

Non‐randomised before‐and‐after study investigating a clinical guideline regarding initial treatment and subsequent discontinuation of antibiotic therapy

Kim 2009

This was an RCT investigating effectiveness of an antibiotic de‐escalation protocol for patients with low probability of HAP (according to CPIS and culture results), published in abstract form only. It has not been possible to contact study authors for further details. It is unclear whether it was a single or multi‐centre study. 109 patients (unclear whether exclusively adults or not) with HAP (diagnostic criteria not described) were randomised to the de‐escalation protocol (N = 54) or standard therapy (N = 55). The protocol is not described nor relevant outcome data presented adequately for inclusion in this review. In addition, the significantly higher rate of appropriate initial antibiotic therapy in the de‐escalation group represents a potential risk of bias

Kollef 2005

Prospective observational study investigating application of previously described clinical guideline (Ibrahim 2001) for patients with suspected VAP, but negative quantitative BAL results

Maldonado‐Ortiz 2004

This multi‐centre randomised controlled study from Mexico enrolled 65 patients in a study intended to evaluate a strategy of early discontinuation of empirical antibiotic therapy: it has been published in abstract form only. 31 patients were allocated to early (< 8 days) discontinuation of empirical therapy versus 34 patients to late discontinuation (> 9 days). Patient characteristics and diagnostic criteria were not described. Outcome data presented in the abstract was inadequate for the study's inclusion in this review, and contact with a trial author did not yield any further information. Furthermore, a highly significant risk of bias was identified: antibiotic discontinuation at Day 8 was higher (70.6%) among patients allocated to late discontinuation than among patients allocated to early discontinuation (67.7%)

Nobre 2008

This was a randomised controlled study comparing a strategy using serial measurements of procalcitonin (PCT) to guide cessation of antibiotic therapy with standard therapy in critically ill patients with sepsis or septic shock. 79 patients were randomised, of whom a total of 47 patients had sepsis of pulmonary origin. A high proportion of patients (68%) had community‐acquired sepsis. A significant proportion of patients in the PCT group (19%) had the protocol overridden to receive a longer course of antibiotics than advised by the algorithm. On intention‐to‐treat analysis, the difference in antibiotic days between control and intervention groups for all patients was not significant. A decision was made to exclude this study on the basis of small numbers of the subgroup of patients with suspected HAP or VAP and the lack of significant difference between groups in terms of duration of therapy

Peery 2001

This was a randomised study comparing diagnostic strategies for suspected VAP. It was not designed to investigate duration of therapy; there were no protocols to guide duration of antibiotic therapy

Rello 2004

This was an observational rather than a randomised controlled study. It investigated outcomes following introduction of a "De‐escalation" strategy which incorporated the initial administration of broad spectrum antibiotics and subsequent simplification of antibiotic treatment with culture results: 1. changing to monotherapy in absence of Pseudomonas sp; 2. shortening therapy to < 5 days if culture negative and > 48 hours of defervescence; 3. changing from broad to narrow spectrum agent on basis of culture results

Sanchez‐Nieto 1998

A randomised clinical trial comparing the effects of an invasive quantitative diagnostic strategy versus a non‐invasive strategy on management of and outcome from suspected VAP

Schroeder 2007

This was a RCT comparing a procalcitonin‐guided antibiotic discontinuation strategy with standard treatment for surgical intensive care patients with severe sepsis. The reasons for exclusion of this study are: 1. its very small size (of the 27 patients enrolled in this study, only 8 were diagnosed with pneumonia); 2. it is unclear what proportion of patients had nosocomial versus community‐acquired infection; 3. of the patients with "pneumonia" it is unclear what proportion were receiving mechanical ventilation at time of diagnosis; 4. limited outcome data relevant to this systematic review are published (in‐hospital mortality and duration of ICU stay)

Singh 1998

Data subsequently published in full (Singh 2000)

Sole 2000

A RCT to evaluate invasive versus non‐invasive diagnostic methods on outcome from VAP

Stolz 2009b

Data subsequently published in full (Stolz 2009a)

Svoboda 2007

RCT evaluating PCT‐guided strategies in the management of septic illness after multiple trauma or major surgery. The study makes no reference to patients with HAP

Wolff 2003

Data subsequently published in full (Chastre 2003a)

BAL: broncho‐alveolar lavage
CPIS: clinical pulmonary infection score
HAP: hospital‐acquired pneumonia
ICU: intensive care unit
ITU: intensive therapy unit
PCT: procalcitonin
RCT: randomised controlled trial
VAP: ventilator‐associated pneumonia

Characteristics of ongoing studies [ordered by study ID]

NCT00934011

Trial name or title

Comparative study of C‐reactive protein versus procalcitonin to guide antibiotic therapy in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock admitted to the Intensive Care Unit

Methods

Randomised controlled trial

Participants

Adult ICU patients with severe sepsis or septic shock

Interventions

CRP‐guided antibiotic therapy versus procalcitonin‐guided antibiotic therapy

Outcomes

Primary: duration of antibiotic therapy for first episode infection, total antibiotic days, 28‐day antibiotic‐free days

Starting date

September 2009

Contact information

http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00934011

Notes

NCT00934011

NCT00987818

Trial name or title

Reduction of antibiotic use in the ICU: procalcitonin guided versus conventional antibiotic therapy in patients with sepsis in the ICU

Methods

Randomised controlled study

Participants

Adult ICU patients receiving antibiotic therapy for sepsis of suspected or proven focus of infection

Interventions

Procalcitonin‐guided antibiotic therapy versus standard antibiotic therapy

Outcomes

Primary outcome: duration of antibiotic therapy; secondary outcome: 28‐day mortality

Starting date

October 2009

Contact information

http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00987818

Notes

NCT00987818

PASS

Trial name or title

The procalcitonin and survival study (PASS)

Methods

A randomised multi‐centre investigator‐initiated trial to investigate whether procalcitonin‐guided diagnostic and therapeutic strategies can improve survival in intensive care unit patients

Participants

1000 critically ill patients

Interventions

"Standard of care" versus "standard of care and procalcitonin‐guided diagnostics and treatment of infection"

Outcomes

Primary outcome: 28‐day mortality

Starting date

In progress

Contact information

http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00271752

Notes

NCT00271752

Pro‐SEPS

Trial name or title

Randomised multicenter prospective study of procalcitonin‐guided treatment on antibiotic use and outcome in severe sepsis ICU patients without obvious infection

Methods

Randomised controlled trial

Participants

Adult patients hospitalised in resuscitation ward, severe sepsis symptomatology, 2 or more SIRS criteria, at least one organ deficiency, no infectious aetiology

Interventions

Duration of antibiotic therapy guided by procalcitonin level versus standard care

Outcomes

Primary outcome: antibiotic treatment at day 5

Starting date

December 2007

Contact information

http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01025180

Notes

NCT01025180

SAPS

Trial name or title

Safety and efficacy of procalcitonin guided antibiotic therapy in adult intensive care units (ICU's) (SAPS)

Methods

Randomised controlled trial

Participants

Adult ICU patients with suspected or proven infection

Interventions

Procalcitonin‐guided antibiotic therapy versus standard therapy

Outcomes

Primary: 28‐day mortality; consumption of antibiotics expressed as the defined daily dosage and duration of antibiotic therapy expressed in days of therapy

Starting date

November 2009

Contact information

http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01139489

Notes

NCT01139489

SISPCT

Trial name or title

Placebo‐controlled trial of sodium selenite and procalcitonin guided antimicrobial therapy in severe sepsis (SISPCT)

Methods

Prospective, randomised multi‐centre 2 x 2 trial

Participants

Adult patients with severe sepsis or septic shock, with onset of < 24 hours

Interventions

2 x 2 trial:

1. Intravenous sodium‐selenite versus placebo

2. Procalcitonin‐guided antibiotic therapy versus alternative (non‐PCT guided) antibiotic protocol

Outcomes

Primary outcome: 28‐day mortality

Starting date

November 2009

Contact information

www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00832039

Notes

NCT00832039

CRP: C‐reactive protein
ICU: intensive care unit
PCT: procalcitonin
SIRS: Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome

Data and analyses

Open in table viewer
Comparison 1. Short (fixed)‐course antibiotic therapy versus prolonged‐course antibiotic therapy for HAP

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 28‐day mortality Show forest plot

2

431

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.08 [0.66, 1.76]

Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Short (fixed)‐course antibiotic therapy versus prolonged‐course antibiotic therapy for HAP, Outcome 1 28‐day mortality.

Comparison 1 Short (fixed)‐course antibiotic therapy versus prolonged‐course antibiotic therapy for HAP, Outcome 1 28‐day mortality.

1.1 NF‐GNB

1

127

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.71 [0.32, 1.56]

1.2 MRSA

1

42

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.28 [0.32, 5.09]

1.3 Non NF‐GNB/MRSA

1

232

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.65 [0.73, 3.73]

1.4 Unspecified organism

1

30

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.93 [0.21, 4.11]

2 Recurrence of pneumonia Show forest plot

3

508

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.37 [0.87, 2.17]

Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Short (fixed)‐course antibiotic therapy versus prolonged‐course antibiotic therapy for HAP, Outcome 2 Recurrence of pneumonia.

Comparison 1 Short (fixed)‐course antibiotic therapy versus prolonged‐course antibiotic therapy for HAP, Outcome 2 Recurrence of pneumonia.

2.1 NF‐GNB

2

176

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.18 [1.14, 4.16]

2.2 MRSA

2

49

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.56 [0.12, 19.61]

2.3 Non NF‐GNB/MRSA

2

253

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.98 [0.55, 1.78]

2.4 Unspecified organism

1

30

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.17 [0.14, 9.59]

3 28‐day antibiotic‐free days Show forest plot

2

431

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

4.02 [2.26, 5.78]

Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Short (fixed)‐course antibiotic therapy versus prolonged‐course antibiotic therapy for HAP, Outcome 3 28‐day antibiotic‐free days.

Comparison 1 Short (fixed)‐course antibiotic therapy versus prolonged‐course antibiotic therapy for HAP, Outcome 3 28‐day antibiotic‐free days.

3.1 NF‐GNB

1

127

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

4.5 [2.25, 6.75]

3.2 MRSA

1

42

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

8.0 [4.14, 11.86]

3.3 Non NF‐GNB/ MRSA

1

232

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

3.70 [2.09, 5.31]

3.4 Unspecified organism

1

30

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

2.3 [1.03, 3.57]

4 ITU mortality Show forest plot

2

107

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.85 [0.37, 1.91]

Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Short (fixed)‐course antibiotic therapy versus prolonged‐course antibiotic therapy for HAP, Outcome 4 ITU mortality.

Comparison 1 Short (fixed)‐course antibiotic therapy versus prolonged‐course antibiotic therapy for HAP, Outcome 4 ITU mortality.

5 Non‐resolution of pneumonia Show forest plot

1

77

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.80 [0.65, 5.02]

Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 Short (fixed)‐course antibiotic therapy versus prolonged‐course antibiotic therapy for HAP, Outcome 5 Non‐resolution of pneumonia.

Comparison 1 Short (fixed)‐course antibiotic therapy versus prolonged‐course antibiotic therapy for HAP, Outcome 5 Non‐resolution of pneumonia.

5.1 NF‐GNB

1

49

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.89 [0.49, 7.40]

5.2 MRSA

1

7

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

11.0 [0.28, 433.80]

5.3 Non NF‐GNB/MRSA

1

21

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.0 [0.16, 6.25]

6 In‐hospital mortality Show forest plot

1

401

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.09 [0.71, 1.67]

Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 Short (fixed)‐course antibiotic therapy versus prolonged‐course antibiotic therapy for HAP, Outcome 6 In‐hospital mortality.

Comparison 1 Short (fixed)‐course antibiotic therapy versus prolonged‐course antibiotic therapy for HAP, Outcome 6 In‐hospital mortality.

6.1 NF‐GNB

1

127

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.75 [0.36, 1.53]

6.2 MRSA

1

42

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.47 [0.43, 4.95]

6.3 Non NF‐GNB/MRSA

1

232

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.32 [0.72, 2.42]

7 Recurrence due to multi‐resistant organism Show forest plot

1

110

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.44 [0.21, 0.95]

Analysis 1.7

Comparison 1 Short (fixed)‐course antibiotic therapy versus prolonged‐course antibiotic therapy for HAP, Outcome 7 Recurrence due to multi‐resistant organism.

Comparison 1 Short (fixed)‐course antibiotic therapy versus prolonged‐course antibiotic therapy for HAP, Outcome 7 Recurrence due to multi‐resistant organism.

8 Duration of ITU stay Show forest plot

2

431

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.01 [‐2.30, 2.27]

Analysis 1.8

Comparison 1 Short (fixed)‐course antibiotic therapy versus prolonged‐course antibiotic therapy for HAP, Outcome 8 Duration of ITU stay.

Comparison 1 Short (fixed)‐course antibiotic therapy versus prolonged‐course antibiotic therapy for HAP, Outcome 8 Duration of ITU stay.

8.1 NF‐GNB

1

127

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.90 [‐5.40, 7.20]

8.2 MRSA

1

42

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

2.90 [‐8.39, 14.19]

8.3 Non NF‐GNB/MRSA

1

232

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

2.70 [‐1.88, 7.28]

8.4 Unspecified organism

1

30

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.60 [‐4.61, 1.41]

9 Duration of hospital stay Show forest plot

1

30

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.0 [‐4.11, 2.11]

Analysis 1.9

Comparison 1 Short (fixed)‐course antibiotic therapy versus prolonged‐course antibiotic therapy for HAP, Outcome 9 Duration of hospital stay.

Comparison 1 Short (fixed)‐course antibiotic therapy versus prolonged‐course antibiotic therapy for HAP, Outcome 9 Duration of hospital stay.

10 Duration of mechanical ventilation Show forest plot

2

107

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.01 [‐0.57, 0.55]

Analysis 1.10

Comparison 1 Short (fixed)‐course antibiotic therapy versus prolonged‐course antibiotic therapy for HAP, Outcome 10 Duration of mechanical ventilation.

Comparison 1 Short (fixed)‐course antibiotic therapy versus prolonged‐course antibiotic therapy for HAP, Outcome 10 Duration of mechanical ventilation.

11 28‐day mechanical ventilation‐free days Show forest plot

2

431

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.47 [‐0.97, 1.92]

Analysis 1.11

Comparison 1 Short (fixed)‐course antibiotic therapy versus prolonged‐course antibiotic therapy for HAP, Outcome 11 28‐day mechanical ventilation‐free days.

Comparison 1 Short (fixed)‐course antibiotic therapy versus prolonged‐course antibiotic therapy for HAP, Outcome 11 28‐day mechanical ventilation‐free days.

11.1 NF‐GNB

1

127

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.50 [‐1.77, 4.77]

11.2 MRSA

1

42

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.30 [‐6.37, 3.77]

11.3 Non NF‐GNB/MRSA

1

232

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.20 [‐3.54, 1.14]

11.4 Unspecified organism

1

30

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.30 [‐0.03, 2.63]

12 Mortality associated with VAP Show forest plot

1

77

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.0 [‐8.85, 10.85]

Analysis 1.12

Comparison 1 Short (fixed)‐course antibiotic therapy versus prolonged‐course antibiotic therapy for HAP, Outcome 12 Mortality associated with VAP.

Comparison 1 Short (fixed)‐course antibiotic therapy versus prolonged‐course antibiotic therapy for HAP, Outcome 12 Mortality associated with VAP.

Open in table viewer
Comparison 2. Discontinuation of antibiotics according to Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 30‐day mortality Show forest plot

1

81

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.33 [0.10, 1.03]

Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Discontinuation of antibiotics according to Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score, Outcome 1 30‐day mortality.

Comparison 2 Discontinuation of antibiotics according to Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score, Outcome 1 30‐day mortality.

2 Episodes of superinfection or antimicrobial resistance Show forest plot

1

81

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.29 [0.09, 0.92]

Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2 Discontinuation of antibiotics according to Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score, Outcome 2 Episodes of superinfection or antimicrobial resistance.

Comparison 2 Discontinuation of antibiotics according to Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score, Outcome 2 Episodes of superinfection or antimicrobial resistance.

3 Duration of antibiotic therapy Show forest plot

1

81

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Analysis 2.3

Comparison 2 Discontinuation of antibiotics according to Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score, Outcome 3 Duration of antibiotic therapy.

Comparison 2 Discontinuation of antibiotics according to Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score, Outcome 3 Duration of antibiotic therapy.

4 Duration of ITU stay Show forest plot

1

81

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Analysis 2.4

Comparison 2 Discontinuation of antibiotics according to Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score, Outcome 4 Duration of ITU stay.

Comparison 2 Discontinuation of antibiotics according to Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score, Outcome 4 Duration of ITU stay.

Open in table viewer
Comparison 3. Discontinuation of antibiotics according clinical guideline

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Recurrence of pneumonia Show forest plot

1

290

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.88 [0.48, 1.59]

Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3 Discontinuation of antibiotics according clinical guideline, Outcome 1 Recurrence of pneumonia.

Comparison 3 Discontinuation of antibiotics according clinical guideline, Outcome 1 Recurrence of pneumonia.

2 Duration of antibiotic therapy Show forest plot

1

290

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐2.0 [‐3.21, ‐0.79]

Analysis 3.2

Comparison 3 Discontinuation of antibiotics according clinical guideline, Outcome 2 Duration of antibiotic therapy.

Comparison 3 Discontinuation of antibiotics according clinical guideline, Outcome 2 Duration of antibiotic therapy.

3 In‐hospital mortality Show forest plot

1

290

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.80 [0.49, 1.29]

Analysis 3.3

Comparison 3 Discontinuation of antibiotics according clinical guideline, Outcome 3 In‐hospital mortality.

Comparison 3 Discontinuation of antibiotics according clinical guideline, Outcome 3 In‐hospital mortality.

4 Duration of ITU stay Show forest plot

1

290

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.20 [‐1.75, 1.35]

Analysis 3.4

Comparison 3 Discontinuation of antibiotics according clinical guideline, Outcome 4 Duration of ITU stay.

Comparison 3 Discontinuation of antibiotics according clinical guideline, Outcome 4 Duration of ITU stay.

5 Duration of hospital stay Show forest plot

1

290

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.30 [‐3.63, 4.23]

Analysis 3.5

Comparison 3 Discontinuation of antibiotics according clinical guideline, Outcome 5 Duration of hospital stay.

Comparison 3 Discontinuation of antibiotics according clinical guideline, Outcome 5 Duration of hospital stay.

6 Duration of mechanical ventilation Show forest plot

1

290

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.30 [‐1.79, 1.19]

Analysis 3.6

Comparison 3 Discontinuation of antibiotics according clinical guideline, Outcome 6 Duration of mechanical ventilation.

Comparison 3 Discontinuation of antibiotics according clinical guideline, Outcome 6 Duration of mechanical ventilation.

Open in table viewer
Comparison 4. Discontinuation of antibiotic therapy according to serum procalcitonin level

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 28‐day mortality Show forest plot

3

308

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.66 [0.39, 1.14]

Analysis 4.1

Comparison 4 Discontinuation of antibiotic therapy according to serum procalcitonin level, Outcome 1 28‐day mortality.

Comparison 4 Discontinuation of antibiotic therapy according to serum procalcitonin level, Outcome 1 28‐day mortality.

2 Recurrence of pneumonia Show forest plot

1

66

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.06 [0.74, 5.70]

Analysis 4.2

Comparison 4 Discontinuation of antibiotic therapy according to serum procalcitonin level, Outcome 2 Recurrence of pneumonia.

Comparison 4 Discontinuation of antibiotic therapy according to serum procalcitonin level, Outcome 2 Recurrence of pneumonia.

3 28‐day antibiotic‐free days Show forest plot

3

308

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

2.80 [1.39, 4.21]

Analysis 4.3

Comparison 4 Discontinuation of antibiotic therapy according to serum procalcitonin level, Outcome 3 28‐day antibiotic‐free days.

Comparison 4 Discontinuation of antibiotic therapy according to serum procalcitonin level, Outcome 3 28‐day antibiotic‐free days.

4 Duration of antibiotic therapy Show forest plot

3

308

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐3.20 [‐4.45, ‐1.95]

Analysis 4.4

Comparison 4 Discontinuation of antibiotic therapy according to serum procalcitonin level, Outcome 4 Duration of antibiotic therapy.

Comparison 4 Discontinuation of antibiotic therapy according to serum procalcitonin level, Outcome 4 Duration of antibiotic therapy.

5 In‐hospital mortality Show forest plot

1

101

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.63 [0.25, 1.58]

Analysis 4.5

Comparison 4 Discontinuation of antibiotic therapy according to serum procalcitonin level, Outcome 5 In‐hospital mortality.

Comparison 4 Discontinuation of antibiotic therapy according to serum procalcitonin level, Outcome 5 In‐hospital mortality.

6 ITU mortality Show forest plot

1

66

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.76 [0.26, 2.22]

Analysis 4.6

Comparison 4 Discontinuation of antibiotic therapy according to serum procalcitonin level, Outcome 6 ITU mortality.

Comparison 4 Discontinuation of antibiotic therapy according to serum procalcitonin level, Outcome 6 ITU mortality.

7 Non‐resolution of pneumonia Show forest plot

1

66

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.17 [0.38, 3.62]

Analysis 4.7

Comparison 4 Discontinuation of antibiotic therapy according to serum procalcitonin level, Outcome 7 Non‐resolution of pneumonia.

Comparison 4 Discontinuation of antibiotic therapy according to serum procalcitonin level, Outcome 7 Non‐resolution of pneumonia.

8 Recurrence due to resistant organism Show forest plot

1

66

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.75 [0.49, 6.21]

Analysis 4.8

Comparison 4 Discontinuation of antibiotic therapy according to serum procalcitonin level, Outcome 8 Recurrence due to resistant organism.

Comparison 4 Discontinuation of antibiotic therapy according to serum procalcitonin level, Outcome 8 Recurrence due to resistant organism.

9 ITU duration of stay Show forest plot

2

167

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐2.68 [‐6.01, 0.66]

Analysis 4.9

Comparison 4 Discontinuation of antibiotic therapy according to serum procalcitonin level, Outcome 9 ITU duration of stay.

Comparison 4 Discontinuation of antibiotic therapy according to serum procalcitonin level, Outcome 9 ITU duration of stay.

10 Duration of hospital stay Show forest plot

1

101

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐2.40 [‐6.40, 1.60]

Analysis 4.10

Comparison 4 Discontinuation of antibiotic therapy according to serum procalcitonin level, Outcome 10 Duration of hospital stay.

Comparison 4 Discontinuation of antibiotic therapy according to serum procalcitonin level, Outcome 10 Duration of hospital stay.

11 Duration of mechanical ventilation Show forest plot

2

167

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.35 [‐3.24, 2.54]

Analysis 4.11

Comparison 4 Discontinuation of antibiotic therapy according to serum procalcitonin level, Outcome 11 Duration of mechanical ventilation.

Comparison 4 Discontinuation of antibiotic therapy according to serum procalcitonin level, Outcome 11 Duration of mechanical ventilation.

'Risk of bias' graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

'Risk of bias' graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.

'Risk of bias' summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

'Risk of bias' summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.

Comparison 1 Short (fixed)‐course antibiotic therapy versus prolonged‐course antibiotic therapy for HAP, Outcome 1 28‐day mortality.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Short (fixed)‐course antibiotic therapy versus prolonged‐course antibiotic therapy for HAP, Outcome 1 28‐day mortality.

Comparison 1 Short (fixed)‐course antibiotic therapy versus prolonged‐course antibiotic therapy for HAP, Outcome 2 Recurrence of pneumonia.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Short (fixed)‐course antibiotic therapy versus prolonged‐course antibiotic therapy for HAP, Outcome 2 Recurrence of pneumonia.

Comparison 1 Short (fixed)‐course antibiotic therapy versus prolonged‐course antibiotic therapy for HAP, Outcome 3 28‐day antibiotic‐free days.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Short (fixed)‐course antibiotic therapy versus prolonged‐course antibiotic therapy for HAP, Outcome 3 28‐day antibiotic‐free days.

Comparison 1 Short (fixed)‐course antibiotic therapy versus prolonged‐course antibiotic therapy for HAP, Outcome 4 ITU mortality.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Short (fixed)‐course antibiotic therapy versus prolonged‐course antibiotic therapy for HAP, Outcome 4 ITU mortality.

Comparison 1 Short (fixed)‐course antibiotic therapy versus prolonged‐course antibiotic therapy for HAP, Outcome 5 Non‐resolution of pneumonia.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 Short (fixed)‐course antibiotic therapy versus prolonged‐course antibiotic therapy for HAP, Outcome 5 Non‐resolution of pneumonia.

Comparison 1 Short (fixed)‐course antibiotic therapy versus prolonged‐course antibiotic therapy for HAP, Outcome 6 In‐hospital mortality.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 Short (fixed)‐course antibiotic therapy versus prolonged‐course antibiotic therapy for HAP, Outcome 6 In‐hospital mortality.

Comparison 1 Short (fixed)‐course antibiotic therapy versus prolonged‐course antibiotic therapy for HAP, Outcome 7 Recurrence due to multi‐resistant organism.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.7

Comparison 1 Short (fixed)‐course antibiotic therapy versus prolonged‐course antibiotic therapy for HAP, Outcome 7 Recurrence due to multi‐resistant organism.

Comparison 1 Short (fixed)‐course antibiotic therapy versus prolonged‐course antibiotic therapy for HAP, Outcome 8 Duration of ITU stay.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.8

Comparison 1 Short (fixed)‐course antibiotic therapy versus prolonged‐course antibiotic therapy for HAP, Outcome 8 Duration of ITU stay.

Comparison 1 Short (fixed)‐course antibiotic therapy versus prolonged‐course antibiotic therapy for HAP, Outcome 9 Duration of hospital stay.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.9

Comparison 1 Short (fixed)‐course antibiotic therapy versus prolonged‐course antibiotic therapy for HAP, Outcome 9 Duration of hospital stay.

Comparison 1 Short (fixed)‐course antibiotic therapy versus prolonged‐course antibiotic therapy for HAP, Outcome 10 Duration of mechanical ventilation.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.10

Comparison 1 Short (fixed)‐course antibiotic therapy versus prolonged‐course antibiotic therapy for HAP, Outcome 10 Duration of mechanical ventilation.

Comparison 1 Short (fixed)‐course antibiotic therapy versus prolonged‐course antibiotic therapy for HAP, Outcome 11 28‐day mechanical ventilation‐free days.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.11

Comparison 1 Short (fixed)‐course antibiotic therapy versus prolonged‐course antibiotic therapy for HAP, Outcome 11 28‐day mechanical ventilation‐free days.

Comparison 1 Short (fixed)‐course antibiotic therapy versus prolonged‐course antibiotic therapy for HAP, Outcome 12 Mortality associated with VAP.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.12

Comparison 1 Short (fixed)‐course antibiotic therapy versus prolonged‐course antibiotic therapy for HAP, Outcome 12 Mortality associated with VAP.

Comparison 2 Discontinuation of antibiotics according to Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score, Outcome 1 30‐day mortality.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Discontinuation of antibiotics according to Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score, Outcome 1 30‐day mortality.

Comparison 2 Discontinuation of antibiotics according to Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score, Outcome 2 Episodes of superinfection or antimicrobial resistance.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2 Discontinuation of antibiotics according to Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score, Outcome 2 Episodes of superinfection or antimicrobial resistance.

Comparison 2 Discontinuation of antibiotics according to Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score, Outcome 3 Duration of antibiotic therapy.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.3

Comparison 2 Discontinuation of antibiotics according to Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score, Outcome 3 Duration of antibiotic therapy.

Comparison 2 Discontinuation of antibiotics according to Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score, Outcome 4 Duration of ITU stay.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.4

Comparison 2 Discontinuation of antibiotics according to Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score, Outcome 4 Duration of ITU stay.

Comparison 3 Discontinuation of antibiotics according clinical guideline, Outcome 1 Recurrence of pneumonia.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3 Discontinuation of antibiotics according clinical guideline, Outcome 1 Recurrence of pneumonia.

Comparison 3 Discontinuation of antibiotics according clinical guideline, Outcome 2 Duration of antibiotic therapy.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.2

Comparison 3 Discontinuation of antibiotics according clinical guideline, Outcome 2 Duration of antibiotic therapy.

Comparison 3 Discontinuation of antibiotics according clinical guideline, Outcome 3 In‐hospital mortality.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.3

Comparison 3 Discontinuation of antibiotics according clinical guideline, Outcome 3 In‐hospital mortality.

Comparison 3 Discontinuation of antibiotics according clinical guideline, Outcome 4 Duration of ITU stay.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.4

Comparison 3 Discontinuation of antibiotics according clinical guideline, Outcome 4 Duration of ITU stay.

Comparison 3 Discontinuation of antibiotics according clinical guideline, Outcome 5 Duration of hospital stay.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.5

Comparison 3 Discontinuation of antibiotics according clinical guideline, Outcome 5 Duration of hospital stay.

Comparison 3 Discontinuation of antibiotics according clinical guideline, Outcome 6 Duration of mechanical ventilation.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.6

Comparison 3 Discontinuation of antibiotics according clinical guideline, Outcome 6 Duration of mechanical ventilation.

Comparison 4 Discontinuation of antibiotic therapy according to serum procalcitonin level, Outcome 1 28‐day mortality.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.1

Comparison 4 Discontinuation of antibiotic therapy according to serum procalcitonin level, Outcome 1 28‐day mortality.

Comparison 4 Discontinuation of antibiotic therapy according to serum procalcitonin level, Outcome 2 Recurrence of pneumonia.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.2

Comparison 4 Discontinuation of antibiotic therapy according to serum procalcitonin level, Outcome 2 Recurrence of pneumonia.

Comparison 4 Discontinuation of antibiotic therapy according to serum procalcitonin level, Outcome 3 28‐day antibiotic‐free days.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.3

Comparison 4 Discontinuation of antibiotic therapy according to serum procalcitonin level, Outcome 3 28‐day antibiotic‐free days.

Comparison 4 Discontinuation of antibiotic therapy according to serum procalcitonin level, Outcome 4 Duration of antibiotic therapy.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.4

Comparison 4 Discontinuation of antibiotic therapy according to serum procalcitonin level, Outcome 4 Duration of antibiotic therapy.

Comparison 4 Discontinuation of antibiotic therapy according to serum procalcitonin level, Outcome 5 In‐hospital mortality.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.5

Comparison 4 Discontinuation of antibiotic therapy according to serum procalcitonin level, Outcome 5 In‐hospital mortality.

Comparison 4 Discontinuation of antibiotic therapy according to serum procalcitonin level, Outcome 6 ITU mortality.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.6

Comparison 4 Discontinuation of antibiotic therapy according to serum procalcitonin level, Outcome 6 ITU mortality.

Comparison 4 Discontinuation of antibiotic therapy according to serum procalcitonin level, Outcome 7 Non‐resolution of pneumonia.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.7

Comparison 4 Discontinuation of antibiotic therapy according to serum procalcitonin level, Outcome 7 Non‐resolution of pneumonia.

Comparison 4 Discontinuation of antibiotic therapy according to serum procalcitonin level, Outcome 8 Recurrence due to resistant organism.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.8

Comparison 4 Discontinuation of antibiotic therapy according to serum procalcitonin level, Outcome 8 Recurrence due to resistant organism.

Comparison 4 Discontinuation of antibiotic therapy according to serum procalcitonin level, Outcome 9 ITU duration of stay.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.9

Comparison 4 Discontinuation of antibiotic therapy according to serum procalcitonin level, Outcome 9 ITU duration of stay.

Comparison 4 Discontinuation of antibiotic therapy according to serum procalcitonin level, Outcome 10 Duration of hospital stay.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.10

Comparison 4 Discontinuation of antibiotic therapy according to serum procalcitonin level, Outcome 10 Duration of hospital stay.

Comparison 4 Discontinuation of antibiotic therapy according to serum procalcitonin level, Outcome 11 Duration of mechanical ventilation.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.11

Comparison 4 Discontinuation of antibiotic therapy according to serum procalcitonin level, Outcome 11 Duration of mechanical ventilation.

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Should short (fixed duration)‐course antibiotic therapy versus prolonged‐course antibiotic therapy be used for critically ill patients with hospital‐acquired pneumonia?

Should short (fixed duration)‐course antibiotic therapy versus prolonged‐course antibiotic therapy be used for critically ill patients with hospital‐acquired pneumonia?

Patient or population: critically ill patients with hospital‐acquired pneumonia
Settings: ICU
Intervention: short (fixed duration)‐course antibiotic therapy
Comparison: prolonged course antibiotic therapy

Outcomes

Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No of participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Assumed risk

Corresponding risk

Prolonged‐course antibiotic therapy

Short (fixed duration)‐course antibiotic therapy

28‐day mortality

Study population

OR 1.08
(0.66 to 1.76)

431
(2 studies)

186 per 1000

198 per 1000
(131 to 287)

Medium‐risk population

270 per 1000

285 per 1000
(196 to 394)

28‐day mortality ‐ NF‐GNB

Study population

OR 0.71
(0.32 to 1.56)

127
(1 study)

See comment

302 per 1000

235 per 1000
(122 to 403)

Medium‐risk population

302 per 1000

235 per 1000
(122 to 403)

28‐day mortality ‐ MRSA

Study population

OR 1.28
(0.32 to 5.09)

42
(1 study)

See comment

238 per 1000

286 per 1000
(91 to 614)

Medium‐risk population

238 per 1000

286 per 1000
(91 to 614)

Recurrence of pneumonia

Study population

OR 1.37
(0.87 to 2.17)

508
(3 studies)

245 per 1000

308 per 1000
(220 to 413)

Medium‐risk population

227 per 1000

287 per 1000
(203 to 389)

Recurrence of pneumonia ‐ NF‐GNB

Study population

OR 2.18
(1.14 to 4.16)

176
(2 studies)

247 per 1000

417 per 1000
(272 to 577)

Medium‐risk population

241 per 1000

409 per 1000
(266 to 569)

Recurrence of pneumonia ‐ MRSA

Study population

OR 1.56
(0.12 to 19.61)

49
(2 studies)

370 per 1000

478 per 1000
(66 to 920)

Medium‐risk population

298 per 1000

398 per 1000
(48 to 893)

28‐day antibiotic‐free days

The mean 28‐day antibiotic‐free days in the intervention groups was
4.02 higher
(2.26 to 5.78 higher)

431
(2 studies)

*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: confidence interval; MRSA: methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus; NF‐GNB: non‐fermenting Gram‐negative bacilli; OR: odds ratio

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings for the main comparison. Should short (fixed duration)‐course antibiotic therapy versus prolonged‐course antibiotic therapy be used for critically ill patients with hospital‐acquired pneumonia?
Summary of findings 2. Discontinuation of antibiotics according to Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score for critically ill adults with hospital‐acquired pneumonia

Discontinuation of antibiotics according to Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score for critically ill adults with hospital‐acquired pneumonia

Patient or population: critically ill adults with hospital‐acquired pneumonia
Settings: ICU
Intervention: discontinuation of antibiotics according to Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score

Outcomes

Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No of participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Assumed risk

Corresponding risk

Control

Discontinuation of antibiotics according to Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score

30‐day mortality

Study population

OR 0.33
(0.1 to 1.03)

81
(1 study)

See comment

310 per 1000

129 per 1000
(43 to 316)

Medium‐risk population

310 per 1000

129 per 1000
(43 to 316)

Episodes of superinfection or antimicrobial resistance

Study population

OR 0.29
(0.09 to 0.92)

81
(1 study)

See comment

333 per 1000

126 per 1000
(43 to 315)

Medium‐risk population

333 per 1000

126 per 1000
(43 to 315)

Duration of antibiotic therapy

See comment

See comment

Not estimable

81
(1 study)

See comment

Duration of ITU stay

See comment

See comment

Not estimable

81
(1 study)

See comment

*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: confidence interval; ITU: intensive therapy unit; OR: odds ratio

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 2. Discontinuation of antibiotics according to Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score for critically ill adults with hospital‐acquired pneumonia
Summary of findings 3. Discontinuation of antibiotics according to clinical guideline for hospital‐acquired pneumonia in critically ill adults

Discontinuation of antibiotics according to clinical guideline for hospital‐acquired pneumonia in critically ill adults

Patient or population: patients with hospital‐acquired pneumonia in critically ill adults
Settings: ICU
Intervention: discontinuation of antibiotics according to clinical guideline

Outcomes

Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No of participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Assumed risk

Corresponding risk

Control

Discontinuation of antibiotics according to clinical guideline

Recurrence of pneumonia

Study population

OR 0.88
(0.48 to 1.59)

290
(1)

See comment

193 per 1000

174 per 1000
(103 to 275)

Medium‐risk population

193 per 1000

174 per 1000
(103 to 275)

Duration of antibiotic therapy

The mean duration of antibiotic therapy in the intervention groups was
2 lower
(3.21 to 0.79 lower)

290
(1)

See comment

In‐hospital mortality

Study population

OR 0.8
(0.49 to 1.29)

290
(1)

See comment

371 per 1000

321 per 1000
(224 to 432)

Medium‐risk population

371 per 1000

321 per 1000
(224 to 432)

Duration of ICU stay

The mean duration of ICU stay in the intervention groups was
0.2 lower
(1.75 lower to 1.35 higher)

290
(1)

See comment

Duration of hospital stay

The mean duration of hospital stay in the intervention groups was
0.3 higher
(3.63 lower to 4.23 higher)

290
(1)

See comment

Duration of mechanical ventilation

The mean duration of mechanical ventilation in the intervention groups was
0.3 lower
(1.79 lower to 1.19 higher)

290
(1)

See comment

*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: confidence interval; ICU: intensive care unit; OR: odds ratio

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 3. Discontinuation of antibiotics according to clinical guideline for hospital‐acquired pneumonia in critically ill adults
Summary of findings 4. Discontinuation of antibiotic therapy according to serum procalcitonin level for hospital‐acquired pneumonia in critically ill adults

Discontinuation of antibiotic therapy according to serum procalcitonin level for hospital‐acquired pneumonia in critically ill adults

Patient or population: hospital‐acquired pneumonia in critically ill adults
Settings: ICU
Intervention: discontinuation of antibiotic therapy according to serum procalcitonin level

Outcomes

Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No of participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Assumed risk

Corresponding risk

Control

Discontinuation of antibiotic therapy according to serum procalcitonin level

28‐day mortality

Study population

OR 0.66
(0.39 to 1.14)

308
(3 studies)

265 per 1000

192 per 1000
(123 to 291)

Medium‐risk population

258 per 1000

187 per 1000
(119 to 284)

Recurrence of pneumonia

Study population

OR 2.06
(0.74 to 5.7)

66
(1 study)

See comment

286 per 1000

452 per 1000
(229 to 695)

Medium‐risk population

286 per 1000

452 per 1000
(229 to 695)

28‐day antibiotic‐free days

The mean 28‐day antibiotic‐free days in the intervention groups was
2.8 higher
(1.39 to 4.21 higher)

167
(2 studies)

Duration of antibiotic therapy
days

The mean duration of antibiotic therapy in the intervention groups was
3.2 lower
(4.45 to 1.95 lower)

308
(3 studies)

*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: confidence interval; ICU: intensive care unit; OR: odds ratio

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 4. Discontinuation of antibiotic therapy according to serum procalcitonin level for hospital‐acquired pneumonia in critically ill adults
Comparison 1. Short (fixed)‐course antibiotic therapy versus prolonged‐course antibiotic therapy for HAP

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 28‐day mortality Show forest plot

2

431

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.08 [0.66, 1.76]

1.1 NF‐GNB

1

127

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.71 [0.32, 1.56]

1.2 MRSA

1

42

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.28 [0.32, 5.09]

1.3 Non NF‐GNB/MRSA

1

232

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.65 [0.73, 3.73]

1.4 Unspecified organism

1

30

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.93 [0.21, 4.11]

2 Recurrence of pneumonia Show forest plot

3

508

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.37 [0.87, 2.17]

2.1 NF‐GNB

2

176

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.18 [1.14, 4.16]

2.2 MRSA

2

49

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.56 [0.12, 19.61]

2.3 Non NF‐GNB/MRSA

2

253

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.98 [0.55, 1.78]

2.4 Unspecified organism

1

30

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.17 [0.14, 9.59]

3 28‐day antibiotic‐free days Show forest plot

2

431

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

4.02 [2.26, 5.78]

3.1 NF‐GNB

1

127

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

4.5 [2.25, 6.75]

3.2 MRSA

1

42

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

8.0 [4.14, 11.86]

3.3 Non NF‐GNB/ MRSA

1

232

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

3.70 [2.09, 5.31]

3.4 Unspecified organism

1

30

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

2.3 [1.03, 3.57]

4 ITU mortality Show forest plot

2

107

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.85 [0.37, 1.91]

5 Non‐resolution of pneumonia Show forest plot

1

77

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.80 [0.65, 5.02]

5.1 NF‐GNB

1

49

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.89 [0.49, 7.40]

5.2 MRSA

1

7

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

11.0 [0.28, 433.80]

5.3 Non NF‐GNB/MRSA

1

21

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.0 [0.16, 6.25]

6 In‐hospital mortality Show forest plot

1

401

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.09 [0.71, 1.67]

6.1 NF‐GNB

1

127

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.75 [0.36, 1.53]

6.2 MRSA

1

42

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.47 [0.43, 4.95]

6.3 Non NF‐GNB/MRSA

1

232

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.32 [0.72, 2.42]

7 Recurrence due to multi‐resistant organism Show forest plot

1

110

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.44 [0.21, 0.95]

8 Duration of ITU stay Show forest plot

2

431

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.01 [‐2.30, 2.27]

8.1 NF‐GNB

1

127

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.90 [‐5.40, 7.20]

8.2 MRSA

1

42

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

2.90 [‐8.39, 14.19]

8.3 Non NF‐GNB/MRSA

1

232

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

2.70 [‐1.88, 7.28]

8.4 Unspecified organism

1

30

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.60 [‐4.61, 1.41]

9 Duration of hospital stay Show forest plot

1

30

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.0 [‐4.11, 2.11]

10 Duration of mechanical ventilation Show forest plot

2

107

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.01 [‐0.57, 0.55]

11 28‐day mechanical ventilation‐free days Show forest plot

2

431

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.47 [‐0.97, 1.92]

11.1 NF‐GNB

1

127

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.50 [‐1.77, 4.77]

11.2 MRSA

1

42

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.30 [‐6.37, 3.77]

11.3 Non NF‐GNB/MRSA

1

232

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.20 [‐3.54, 1.14]

11.4 Unspecified organism

1

30

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.30 [‐0.03, 2.63]

12 Mortality associated with VAP Show forest plot

1

77

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.0 [‐8.85, 10.85]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Short (fixed)‐course antibiotic therapy versus prolonged‐course antibiotic therapy for HAP
Comparison 2. Discontinuation of antibiotics according to Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 30‐day mortality Show forest plot

1

81

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.33 [0.10, 1.03]

2 Episodes of superinfection or antimicrobial resistance Show forest plot

1

81

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.29 [0.09, 0.92]

3 Duration of antibiotic therapy Show forest plot

1

81

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4 Duration of ITU stay Show forest plot

1

81

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 2. Discontinuation of antibiotics according to Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score
Comparison 3. Discontinuation of antibiotics according clinical guideline

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Recurrence of pneumonia Show forest plot

1

290

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.88 [0.48, 1.59]

2 Duration of antibiotic therapy Show forest plot

1

290

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐2.0 [‐3.21, ‐0.79]

3 In‐hospital mortality Show forest plot

1

290

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.80 [0.49, 1.29]

4 Duration of ITU stay Show forest plot

1

290

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.20 [‐1.75, 1.35]

5 Duration of hospital stay Show forest plot

1

290

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.30 [‐3.63, 4.23]

6 Duration of mechanical ventilation Show forest plot

1

290

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.30 [‐1.79, 1.19]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 3. Discontinuation of antibiotics according clinical guideline
Comparison 4. Discontinuation of antibiotic therapy according to serum procalcitonin level

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 28‐day mortality Show forest plot

3

308

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.66 [0.39, 1.14]

2 Recurrence of pneumonia Show forest plot

1

66

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.06 [0.74, 5.70]

3 28‐day antibiotic‐free days Show forest plot

3

308

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

2.80 [1.39, 4.21]

4 Duration of antibiotic therapy Show forest plot

3

308

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐3.20 [‐4.45, ‐1.95]

5 In‐hospital mortality Show forest plot

1

101

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.63 [0.25, 1.58]

6 ITU mortality Show forest plot

1

66

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.76 [0.26, 2.22]

7 Non‐resolution of pneumonia Show forest plot

1

66

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.17 [0.38, 3.62]

8 Recurrence due to resistant organism Show forest plot

1

66

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.75 [0.49, 6.21]

9 ITU duration of stay Show forest plot

2

167

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐2.68 [‐6.01, 0.66]

10 Duration of hospital stay Show forest plot

1

101

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐2.40 [‐6.40, 1.60]

11 Duration of mechanical ventilation Show forest plot

2

167

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.35 [‐3.24, 2.54]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 4. Discontinuation of antibiotic therapy according to serum procalcitonin level