Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Effects and safety of preventive oral iron or iron+folic acid supplementation for women during pregnancy

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Contraer todo Desplegar todo

Referencias

Barton 1994 {published data only}

Barton DPJ, Joy MT, Lappin TRJ, Afrasiabi M, Morel JG, O'Riordan J, et al. Maternal erythropoietin in singleton pregnancies: a randomized trial on the effect of oral hematinic supplementation. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1994;170:896‐901.
Murphy JF. Randomised double blind control trial of iron/placebo administration to pregnant women with high booking Hb concentrations (Hb>149/dl). Personal communication1990.

Batu 1976 {published data only}

Batu AT, Toe T, Pe H, Nyunt KK. A prophylactic trial of iron and folic acid supplements in pregnant Burmese women. Israel Journal of Medical Sciences 1976;12:1410‐7.

Butler 1968 {published data only}

Butler EB. The effect of iron and folic acid on red cell and plasma volume in pregnancy. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of the British Commonwealth 1968;75:497‐510.

Buytaert 1983 {published data only}

Buytaert G, Wallenburg HCS, Van Eijk HG, Buytaert P. Iron supplementation during pregnancy. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 1983;15:11‐6.

Cantlie 1971 {published data only}

Cantlie GSD, De Leeuw NKM, Lowenstein L. Iron and folate nutrition in a group of private obstetrical patients. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1971;24:637‐41.

Chanarin 1971 {published data only}

Chanarin I, Rothman D. Further observations on the relation between iron and folate status in pregnancy. British Medical Journal 1971;2:81‐4.

Charoenlarp 1988 {published data only}

Charoenlarp P, Dhanamitta S, Kaewvichit R, Silprasert A, Suwanaradd C, Na‐Nakorn S, et al. A WHO collaborative study on iron supplementation in Burma and in Thailand. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1988;47(2):280‐97.

Chew 1996a {published and unpublished data}

Chew F, Torun B, Viteri FE. Comparison of weekly and daily iron supplementation to pregnant women in Guatemala (supervised and unsupervised). FASEB Journal 1996;10:A4221.
Chew F, Torun B, Viteri FE. Individual patient data (as supplied 15 January 2004). Data on file.
Chew F, Torún B, Viteri FE. Comparison of daily and weekly iron supplementation in pregnant women with and without direct supervision [Comparación de la suplementación diaria o semanal de hierro en mujeres embarazadas con y sin supervisión directa]. XI Congreso Latino Americano de Nutrición, Libro de Resumenes. Guatemala: SLAN, 1997:94.

Chew 1996b {published and unpublished data}

Chew F, Torun B, Viteri FE. Comparison of weekly and daily iron supplementation to pregnant women in Guatemala (supervised and unsupervised). FASEB Journal 1996;10:A4221.
Chew F, Torun B, Viteri FE. Individual patient data (as supplied 15 January 2004). Data on file.
Chew F, Torún B, Viteri FE. Comparison of daily and weekly iron supplementation in pregnant women with and without direct supervision [Comparación de la suplementación diaria o semanal de hierro en mujeres embarazadas con y sin supervisión directa]. XI Congreso Latino Americano de Nutrición, Libro de Resumenes. Guatemala: SLAN, 1997:94.

Chisholm 1966 {published data only}

Chisholm M. A controlled clinical trial of prophylactic folic acid and iron in pregnancy. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of the British Commonwealth 1966;73:191‐6.

Christian 2003 {published and unpublished data}

Christian P. Personal communication 2007 September 28.
Christian P, Darmstadt GL, Wu L, Khatry SK, LeClerq SC, Katz J, et al. The effect of maternal micronutrient supplementation on early neonatal morbidity in rural Nepal: a randomised, controlled, community trial. Archives of Disease in Childhood 2008;93(8):660‐4.
Christian P, Jiang T, Khatry SK, LeClerq SC, Shrestha SR, West Jr KP. Antenatal supplementation with micronutrients and biochemical indicators of status and subclinical infection in rural Nepal. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2006;83:788‐74.
Christian P, Khatry SK, Katz J, Pradhan EK, LeClerq SC, Shrestha SR, et al. Effects of alternative maternal micronutrient supplements on low birth weight in rural Nepal: double blind randomised community trial. BMJ 2003;326(7389):571.
Christian P, Shrestha J, LeClerq SC, Khatry SK, Jiang T, Wagner T, et al. Supplementation with micronutrients in addition to iron and folic acid does not further improve the hematologic status of pregnant women in rural Nepal. Journal of Nutrition 2003;133(11):3492‐8.
Christian P, West KP, Khatry SK, Leclerq SC, Pradhan EK, Katz J, et al. Effects of maternal micronutrient supplementation on fetal loss and infant mortality: a cluster‐randomized trial in Nepal. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2003;78(6):1194‐202.
Christian PS, Darmstadt GL, Wu L, Khatry SK, Leclerq SC, Katz J, et al. The impact of maternal micronutrient supplementation on early neonatal morbidity in rural Nepal: a randomized, controlled, community trial. Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition2007; Vol. [Epub ahead of print].
Katz J, Christian P, Dominici F, Zeger SL. Treatment effects of maternal micronutrient supplementation vary by percentiles of the birth weight distribution in rural Nepal. Journal of Nutrition 2006;136(5):1389‐94.
Stewart CP, Katz J, Khatry SK, LeClerq SC, Shrestha SR, West KP, et al. Preterm delivery but not intrauterine growth retardation is associated with young maternal age among primiparae in rural Nepal. Maternal & Child Nutrition 2007;3(3):174‐85.

Cogswell 2003 {published and unpublished data}

Cogswell ME, Parvanta I, Ickes L, Yip R, Brittenham GM. Individual patient data (as supplied 4 February 2004). Data on file.
Cogswell ME, Parvanta I, Ickes L, Yip R, Brittenham GM. Iron supplementation during pregnancy, anemia, and birth weight: a randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2003;78(4):773‐81.
Cogswell ME, Parvanta I, Yip R, Brittenham GM. Iron supplementation during pregnancy for initially non‐anemic, iron replete women ‐ decreased prevalence of low birth weight infants. Report of the 2001 INACG Symposium. Why iron is important and what to do about it: a new perspective. Washington D.C.: ILSI Human Nutrition Institute, 2002; Vol. 1:42, Abstract no: 7.
Cogswell ME, Parvanta I, Yip R, Brittenham GM. Low iron during pregnancy increases the risk of delivering preterm or small infants. Report of the 2001 INACG Symposium. Why iron is important and what to do about it: a new perspective. Washington DC: ILSI Human Nutrition Institute, 2002; Vol. 1:42, Abstract no: 8.

De Benaze 1989 {published data only}

De Benaze C, Galan P, Wainer R, Hercberg S. Prevention of iron deficient anemia during pregnancy by early iron supplementation: a controlled trial. Revue d Epidemiologie et de Sante Publique 1989;37:109‐18.

Ekstrom 2002 {published and unpublished data}

Ekstrom EC. Personal communication 2004 April 12.
Ekstrom EC, Hyder SM, Chowdhury AM, Chowdhury SA, Lonnerdal B, Habicht JP, et al. Efficacy and trial effectiveness of weekly and daily iron supplementation among pregnant women in rural Bangladesh: disentangling the issues. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2002;76(6):1392‐400.
Hyder SM, Persson LA, Chowdhury AM, Ekstrom EC. Do side‐effects reduce compliance to iron supplementation? A study of daily‐ and weekly‐dose regimens in pregnancy. Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition 2002;2:175‐9.
Hyder SM, Persson LA, Chowdhury R, Lonnerdal B, Ekstrom EC. Impact of daily and weekly iron supplementation to women in pregnancy and puerperium on haemoglobin and iron status six weeks postpartum: results from a community‐based study in Bangladesh. Scandinavian Journal of Nutrition 2003;47(1):19‐25.

Eskeland 1997 {published and unpublished data}

Eskeland B. Database provided by authors (as supplied 22 February 2004). Data on file.
Eskeland B, Malterud K, Ulvik RJ, Hunskaar S. Iron supplementation in pregnancy: is less enough? A randomized, placebo controlled trial of low dose iron supplementation with and without heme iron. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 1997;76(9):822‐8.

Hankin 1963 {published data only}

Hankin ME. The value of iron supplementation during pregnancy. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1963;3:111‐8.
Hankin ME, Symonds EM. Body weight, diet and pre‐eclamptic toxaemia in pregnancy. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1962;4:156‐60.

Harvey 2007 {published and unpublished data}

Fairweather‐Tait S. Personal communication. 2007 September 5.
Harvey LJ, Dainty JR, Hollands WJ, Bull VJ, Hoogewerff JA, Foxall RJ, et al. Effect of high‐dose iron supplements on fractional zinc absorption and status in pregnant women. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2007;85:131‐6.

Hemminki 1991 {published and unpublished data}

Hemminki E, Merilainen J. Long‐term effects of iron prophylaxis during pregnancy. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 1994;46:3.
Hemminki E, Merilainen J. Long‐term follow‐up of mothers and their infants in a randomized trial on iron prophylaxis during pregnancy. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1995;173:205‐9.
Hemminki E, Rimpela U. A randomized comparison of routine vs selective iron supplementation during pregnancy. Journal of the American College of Nutrition 1991;10:3‐10.
Hemminki E, Rimpela U. Iron supplementation, maternal packed cell volume, and fetal growth. Archives of Disease in Childhood 1991;66:422‐5.
Hemminki E, Rimpela U, Yla‐Outinen A. Iron prophylaxis during pregnancy and infections. International Journal of Vitamin and Nutrition Research 1991;61:370‐1.
Hemminki E, Uski A, Koponen P, Rimpela U. Iron supplementation during pregnancy ‐ experiences of a randomized trial relying on health service personnel. Controlled Clinical Trials 1989;10:290‐8.

Holly 1955 {published data only}

Holly RG. Anemia in pregnancy. Obstetrics & Gynecology 1955;5:562‐9.

Hood 1960 {published data only}

Hood WE, Bond WL. Iron deficiency prophylaxis during pregnancy. Obstetrics & Gynecology 1960;16:82‐4.

Kerr 1958 {published data only}

Kerr DNS, Davidson S. The prophylaxis of iron‐deficiency anemia in pregnancy. Lancet 1958;2:483‐8.

Lee 2005 {published and unpublished data}

Lee JI, Lee JA, Lim HS. Effect of time of initiation and dose of prenatal iron and folic acid supplementation on iron and folate nutriture of Korean women during pregnancy. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2005;82(4):843‐9.
Lim HS. Personal communication 2007 September 27.

Liu 1996 {published and unpublished data}

Liu XN, Liu PY. The effectiveness of weekly iron supplementation regimen in improving the iron status of Chinese children and pregnant women. Biomedical and Environmental Sciences 1996;9:341‐7.
Liu XN, Liu PY, Viteri FE. Individual patient data (as supplied December 2003). Data on file.

Makrides 2003 {published and unpublished data}

Makrides M. Personal communication 2004 April 12.
Makrides M, Crowther CA, Gibson RA, Gibson RS, Skeaff CM. Efficacy and tolerability of low‐dose iron supplements during pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2003;78:145‐53.
Makrides M, Crowther CA, Gibson RA, Gibson RS, Skeaff CM. Low‐dose iron supplements in pregnancy prevent iron deficiency at the end of pregnancy and during the post‐partum period: the results of a randomised controlled trial [abstract]. Perinatal Society of Australia and New Zealand 7th Annual Congress; 2003 March 9‐12; Tasmania, Australia. 2003:P99.
Parsons AG, Zhou SJ, Spurrier NJ, Makrides M. Effect of iron supplementation during pregnancy on the behaviour of children at early school age: long‐term follow‐up of a randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Nutrition 2008;99(5):1133‐9.
Zhou SH, Gibson RA, Crowther CA, Baghurst P, Makrides M. Effect of iron supplementation during pregnancy on the intelligence quotient and behavior of children at 4 years of age: long term follow‐up of a randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2006;83(5):1112‐7.
Zhou SJ, Gibson RA, Makrides M. Routine iron supplementation in pregnancy has no effect on iron status of children at six months and four years of age. Journal of Pediatrics 2007;151(4):438‐40.

Meier 2003 {published data only}

Meier PR, Nickerson HJ, Olson KA, Berg RL, Meyer JA. Prevention of iron deficiency anemia in adolescent and adult pregnancies. Clinical Medicine and Research 2003;1(1):29‐36.

Menendez 1994 {published data only}

Menendez C, Todd J, Alonso PL, Francis N, Lulat S, Ceesay S, et al. The effects or iron supplementation during pregnancy, given by traditional birth attendants, on the prevalence of anaemia and malaria. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 1994;88:590‐3.
Menendez C, Todd J, Alonso PL, Francis N, Lulat S, Ceesay S, et al. The response to iron supplementation of pregnant women with the haemoglobin genotype AA or AS. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 1995;89(3):289‐92.

Milman 1991 {published data only}

Milman N, Agger AO, Nielsen OJ. Iron supplementation during pregnancy. Effect on iron status markers, serum erythropoietin and human placental lactogen. A placebo controlled study in 207 Danish women. Danish Medical Bulletin 1991;38(6):471‐6.
Milman N, Agger AO, Nielson OJ. Iron status markers and serum erythropoietin in 120 mothers and newborn infants: effect of iron supplementation in normal pregnancy. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 1994;73:200‐4.
Milman N, Byg KE, Agger AO. Hemoglobin and erythrocyte indices during normal pregnancy and postpartum in 206 women with and without iron supplementation. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 2000;79(2):89‐98.
Milman N, Graudal N, Agger AO. Iron status markers during pregnancy. No relationship between levels at the beginning of the second trimester, prior to delivery and post partum. Journal of Internal Medicine 1995;237:261‐7.
Milman N, Graudal N, Nielsen OJ, Agger AO. Serum erythropoietin during normal pregnancy: relationship to hemoglobin and iron status markers and impact of iron supplementation in a longitudinal, placebo‐controlled study on 118 women. International Journal of Hematology 1997;66(2):159‐68.
Milman N, Graudal NA, Agger AO. Iron status markers during normal pregnancy in 120 women. No clinically useful relationship between levels in the second trimester, later in pregnancy, and post partum. Ugeskrift for Laeger 1995;157:6571‐5.

Mukhopadhyay 2004 {published data only}

Mukhopadhyay A, Bhatla N, Kriplani A, Agarwal N, Saxena R. Erythrocyte indices in pregnancy: effect of intermittent iron supplementation. National Medical Journal of India 2004;17(3):135‐7.
Mukhopadhyay A, Bhatla N, Kriplani A, Pandey RM, Saxena R. Daily versus intermittent iron supplementation in pregnant women: hematological and pregnancy outcome. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research 2004;30(6):409‐17. [MEDLINE: 15566454]

Paintin 1966 {published and unpublished data}

Paintin DB, Thompson AM, Hytten FE. Personal communication1986.
Paintin DB, Thomson AM, Hytten FE. Iron and haemoglobin level in pregnancy. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of the British Commonwealth 1966;73:181‐90.

Pita Martin 1999 {published and unpublished data}

Pita Martin de Portela ML. Personal communication 2004 March 22.
Pita Martin de Portela ML, Langini SH, Fleischman S, Garcia M, Lopez LB, Guntin R, et al. Effect of iron supplementation and its frequency during pregnancy. Medicina 1999;59:430‐6.

Preziosi 1997 {published data only}

Preziosi P, Prual A, Galan P, Daouda H, Boureima H, Hercberg S. Effect of iron supplementation on the iron status of pregnant women: consequences for newborns. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1997;66:1178‐82.

Pritchard 1958 {published data only}

Pritchard J, Hunt C. A comparison of the hematologic responses following the routine prenatal administration of intramuscular and oral iron. Surgery, Gynecology and Obstetrics 1958;106:516‐8.

Puolakka 1980 {published data only}

Puolakka J, Janne O, Pakarinen A, Jarvinen PA, Vihko R. Serum ferritin as a measure of iron stores during and after normal pregnancy with and without iron supplement. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 1980;95:43‐51.

Ridwan 1996 {published and unpublished data}

Ridwan E, Schultink W, Dillon D, Gross R. Effects of weekly iron supplementation on pregnant Indonesian women are similar to those of daily supplementation. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1996;63(6):884‐90.
Schultink W, Ridwan E, Dillon D, Gross R. Individual patient data (as supplied 12 January 2004). Data on file.

Robinson 1998 {published and unpublished data}

Robinson JS. Individual patient data (as supplied 11 March 2004). Data on file.
Robinson JS. Working with traditional birth attendants to improve iron tablet utilization by pregnant women. MotherCare Technical Working Paper #7. Arlington, VA1998.
Robinson JS, Sopacua J, Napitapulu J. Using traditional birth attendants to improve iron tablet utilization by pregnant women. Maluku Province, Indonesia. Draft paper. Mother Care Project. Project Concern International San Diego CA1999.
Robinson JS, Yip R. Weekly versus daily iron tablet supplementation in pregnant women in Indonesia. Draft paper2000.

Romslo 1983 {published data only}

Romslo I, Haram K, Sagen N, Augensen K. Iron requirements in normal pregnancy as assessed by serum ferritin, serum transferrin saturation and erythrocyte protoporphyrin determinations. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1983;90:101‐7.

Siega‐Riz 2001 {published and unpublished data}

Bodnar LM, Davidian M, Siega‐Riz AM, Tsiatis AA. Marginal structural models for analyzing causal effects of time‐dependent treatments: an application in perinatal epidemiology. American Journal of Epidemiology 2004;159(10):926‐34.
Jasti S, Siega‐Riz AM, Cogswell ME, Hartzema AG. Correction for errors in measuring adherence to prenatal multivitamin/mineral supplement use among low‐income women. Journal of Nutrition 2006;136(2):479‐83.
Jasti S, Siega‐Riz AM, Cogswell ME, Hartzema AG, Bentley ME. Pill count adherence to prenatal multivitamin/mineral supplement use among low‐income women. Journal of Nutrition 2005;135(5):1093‐101.
Siega‐Riz A, Hartzema A, Turnbull C, Thorp JJ, McDonald T. A trial of selective versus routine iron supplementation to prevent third trimester anemia during pregnancy [abstract]. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology2001; Vol. 185, issue 6 Suppl:S119.
Siega‐Riz AM, Hartzema AG, Turnbull C, Thorp J, McDonald T, Cogswell ME. The effects of prophylactic iron given in prenatal supplements on iron status and birth outcomes: a randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2006;194(2):512‐9.

Svanberg 1975 {published data only}

Svanberg B, Arvidsson B, Norrby A, Rybo G, Solvell L. Absorption of supplemental iron during pregnancy ‐ a longitudinal study with repeated bone marrow studies and absorption measurements. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 1975;48:87‐108.

Taylor 1982 {published data only}

Taylor DJ, Mallen C, McDougall N, Lind T. Personal communication1982.
Taylor DJ, Mallen C, McDougall N, Lind T. Effect of iron supplementation on serum ferritin levels during and after pregnancy. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1982;89:1011‐7.

Tura 1989 {published data only}

Tura S, Carenza L, Baccarani M, Bagnara M, Bocci A, Bottone P, et al. Therapy and iron supplements with ferritin during pregnancy. A randomized prospective study of 458 cases. Recenti Progessi in Medicina 1989;80:607‐14.

Van Eijk 1978 {published data only}

Van Eijk HG, Kroos MJ, Hoogendoorn GA, Wallenburg HC. Serum ferritin and iron stores during pregnancy. Clinica Chimica Acta 1978;83(1‐2):81‐91.

Wallenburg 1983 {published data only}

Buytaert G, Wallenburg HCS, Van Eijk HG, Buytaert P. Iron supplementation during pregnancy. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 1983;15:11‐6.
Wallenburg HCS, Van Eijk HG. Effect of oral iron supplementation during pregnancy on maternal and fetal iron status. Journal of Perinatal Medicine 1984;12:7‐12.

Willoughby 1967 {published data only}

Willoughby MLN. An investigation of folic acid requirements in pregnancy. II. British Journal of Haematology 1967;13:503‐9.

Wills 1947 {published data only}

Wills L, Hill G, Bingham K, Miall M, Wrigley J. Haemoglobin levels in pregnancy: the effect of the rationing scheme and routine administration of iron. British Journal of Nutrition 1947;1:126‐38.

Winichagoon 2003 {unpublished data only}

Winichagoon P, Lertmullikaporn N, Chitcumroonchokechai C, Thamrongwarangkul T. Daily versus weekly iron supplementation to pregnant women in rural northeast Thailand. Personal communication2003.

Young 2000 {published data only}

Young MW, Lupafya E, Kapenda E, Bobrow EA. The effectiveness of weekly iron supplementation in pregnant women of rural northern Malawi. Tropical Doctor 2000;30(2):84‐8.

Yu 1998 {published and unpublished data}

Yu KH, Yoon JS. The effect of weekly iron supplementation on iron and zinc nutritional status in pregnant women. Korean Journal of Nutrition 1998;31(8):1270‐82.
Yu KH, Yoon, JS. Individual patient data (as supplied 11 March 2004). Data on file.

Ziaei 2007 {published and unpublished data}

Ziaei S. Personal communication 2007 October 1.
Ziaei S, Norrozi M, Faghihzadeh S, Jafarbegloo E. A randomised placebo‐controlled trial to determine the effect of iron supplementation on pregnancy outcome in pregnant women with haemoglobin > or = 13.2 g/dl. BJOG :an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2007;114(6):684‐8.

Ziaei 2008 {unpublished data only}

Janghorban R, Ziaei S, Faghihzade S. Evaluation of serum copper level in pregnant women with high hemoglobin. Iranian Journal of Medical Sciences 2006;31(3):170‐2.
Ziaei S. Iron status markers in non‐anemic pregnant women with or without iron supplementation in pregnancy. Personal communication 2007 October 9.
Ziaei S, Janghorban R, Shariatdoust S, Faghihzadeh S. The effects of iron supplementation on serum copper and zinc levels in pregnant women with high‐normal hemoglobin. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 2008;100:133‐5.
Ziaei S, Mehrnia M, Faghihzadeh S. Iron status markers in nonanemic pregnant women with and without iron supplementation. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 2008;100:130‐2.

Aaseth 2001 {published data only}

Aaseth J, Thomassen Y, Ellingsen DG, Stoa‐Birketvedt G. Prophylactic iron supplementation in pregnant women in Norway. Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine & Biology 2001;15(2‐3):167‐74.

Abel 2000 {published data only}

Abel R, Rajaratnam J, Kalaimani A, Kirubakaran S. Can iron status be improved in each of the three trimesters? A community base study. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2000;54:490‐3.

Afifi 1978 {published data only}

Afifi AM. Plexafer‐F in the management of latent iron deficiency in pregnancy. Journal of International Medical Research 1978;6:34‐40.

Ahn 2006 {published data only}

Ahn E, Pairaudeau N, Pairaudeau N, Cerat Y, Couturier B, Fortier A, et al. A randomized cross over trial of tolerability and compliance of a micronutrient supplement with low iron separated from calcium vs high iron combined with calcium in pregnant women. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2006;6:10.

Angeles‐Agdeppa 2003 {published data only (unpublished sought but not used)}

Angeles‐Agdeppa I. The effects of a community‐based weekly iron‐folate supplementation on hemoglobin and iron status of pregnant and non‐pregnant women in Philippines. Meeting on weekly iron/folic acid supplementation for preventing anaemia in women of reproductive age in the Western Pacific Region Report. Manila, Philippines, February 2004.
Angeles‐Agdeppa I, Paulino LS, Ramos AC, Etorma UM, Cavalli‐Sforza T, Milani S. Government‐industry partnership in weekly iron‐folic acid supplementation for women of reproductive age in the Philippines: impact on iron status. Nutrition Reviews 2005;63(12 Pt 2):S116‐25.
Paulino LS, Angeles‐Agdeppa I, Etorma UM, Ramos AC, Cavalli‐Sforza T. Weekly iron‐folic acid supplementation to improve iron status and prevent pregnancy anemia in Filipino women of reproductive age: the Philippine experience through government and private partnership. Nutrition Reviews 2005;63(12 Pt 2):S109‐115.

Babior 1985 {published data only}

Babior BM, Peters WA, Briden PM, Cetrulo CL. Pregnant women's absorption of iron from prenatal supplements. Journal of Reproductive Medicine 1985;30:355‐7.

Bencaiova 2007 {unpublished data only}

Bencaiova G, von Mandach U, Zimmerman R. Optimal prophylaxis of a lack of iron and iron‐deficiency anemia in the pregnancy [abstract] [Optimale Prophylaxe e Ines Elsenmangels und elner Eisenmangelanamie In der Schwangerschaft: eine randomisierte Studie]. Gynakologisch‐Geburtshilfliche Rundschau 2007;47:140.

Berger 2003 {published data only (unpublished sought but not used)}

Berger J. Effectiveness of weekly iron/folate supplementation on anaemia and iron status in women of reproductive age in rural Viet Nam. Meeting on weekly iron/folic acid supplementation for preventing anaemia in women of reproductive age in the Western Pacific Region Report. Manila, Philippines, February 2004.
Berger J, Thanh HT, Cavalli‐Sforza T, Smitasiri S, Khan NC, Milani S, et al. Community mobilization and social marketing to promote weekly iron‐folic acid supplementation in women of reproductive age in Vietnam: impact on anemia and iron status. Nutrition Reviews 2005;63(12 Pt 2):S95‐108.
Hoa PT, Berger J, Paliakara N, Nhien NV, Morestin‐Cadet S, Quyen DT, et al. Weekly iron‐folate supplementation in women in reproductive age in Vietnam: a new approach to control iron deficiency anemia during pregnancy. INACG Symposium; February 2001; Hanoi, Vietnam. 2001:45, Abstract No: 18.
Khan NC, Thanh HT, Berger J, Hoa PT, Quang ND, Smitasiri S, et al. Community mobilization and social marketing to promote weekly iron‐folic acid supplementation: a new approach toward controlling anemia among women of reproductive age in Vietnam. Nutrition Reviews 2005;63(12 Pt 2):S87‐94.

Bergsjo 1987 {published data only}

Bergsjo P. The effects of iron supplementation in pregnancy. Personal communication1987.

Blot 1980 {published data only}

Blot I, Tchernia G, Chenayer M, Hill C, Hajeri H, Leluc R. Iron deficiency in the pregnant woman. Its repercussions on the newborn. The influence of systematic iron treatment. Journal de Gynecologie, Obstetrique et Biologie de la Reproduction 1980;9:489‐95.

Brown 1972 {published data only}

Brown GM, Dawson DW. Prevention of anaemia in pregnancy. Current Medical Research and Opinion 1972;1:93‐9.

Burslem 1968 {published data only}

Burslem RW, Poller L, Wacks H. A trial of slow release ferrous sulphate (Ferrogradumet) in prevention of iron deficiency in pregnancy. Acta Haematologica 1968;40:200‐4.

Buss 1981 {published data only}

Buss M. Therapy of iron‐folic acid deficiency in pregnancy [Therapie des Eisen‐Folsauremangels in der Schwangerschaft]. Zeitschrift fur Allgemeinmedizin 1981;57(22):1526‐32.

Carrasco 1962 {published data only}

Carrasco E, Jose F, Samson G, Germar E, Padilla B. Effect of D‐sorbitol on the absorption and transfer of nutrients from mother to fetus. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1962;11:533‐6.

Casanueva 2003a {published and unpublished data}

Casanueva E. Weekly iron‐folate (Fe‐fol) supplementation during pregnancy in Mexican women. Personal communication2003.
Casanueva E, Viteri FE, Mares‐Galindo M, Meza‐Camacho C, Loria A, Schnaas L, et al. Weekly iron as a safe alternative to daily supplementation for nonanemic pregnant women. Archives of Medical Research 2006;37(5):674‐82.

Chanarin 1965 {published data only}

Chanarin I, Rothman D, Berry V. Iron deficiency and its relation to folic acid status in pregnancy: results of a clinical trial. BMJ 1965;1:480‐5.

Chawla 1995 {published data only}

Chawla PK, Puri R. Impact of nutritional supplements on hematological profile of pregnant women. Indian Pediatrics 1995;32:876‐80.

Coelho 2000 {published data only}

Coelho K, Ramdas S, Pillai S. A comparative study of changes in haemoglobin with high and low dose iron preparations in pregnant women. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 2000;50(2):37‐9.

Cook 1990 {published data only}

Cook JD, Carriaga M, Kahn SG, Schalch W, Skikne BS. Gastric delivery system for iron supplementation. Lancet 1990;335(8698):1136‐9.

Dawson 1987 {published data only}

Dawson EB, McGanity WJ. Protection of maternal iron stores in pregnancy. Journal of Reproductive Medicine 1987;32(6 Suppl):478‐87.

Dijkhuizen 2004 {published data only}

Dijkhuizen MA, Wieringa FT, West CE, Muhilal. Zinc plus beta‐carotene supplementation of pregnant women is superior to beta‐carotene supplementation alone in improving vitamin a status in both mothers and infants. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2004;80(5):1299‐307.

Dommisse 1983 {published data only}

Dommisse J, Bell DJH, Du Toit ED, Midgley V, Cohen M. Iron‐storage deficiency and iron supplementation in pregnancy. South African Medical Journal 1983;64:1047‐51.

Edgar 1956 {published data only}

Edgar W, Rice HM. Administration of iron in antenatal clinics. Lancet 1956;1:599‐602.

Ekstrom 1996 {published data only}

Ekstrom EM, Kavishe FP, Habicht J, Frongillo EA, Rasmussen KM, Hemed L. Adherence to iron supplementation during pregnancy in Tanzania: determinants and hematologic consequences. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1996;64:368‐74.

Fenton 1977 {published data only}

Fenton V, Cavill I, Fisher J. Iron stores in pregnancy. British Journal of Haematology 1977;37:145‐9.

Fleming 1974 {published data only}

Fleming AF, Martin JD, Hahnel R, Westlake AJ. Effects of iron and folic acid antenatal supplements on maternal haematology and fetal wellbeing. Medical Journal of Australia 1974;2:429‐36.

Fleming 1986 {published data only}

Fleming AF. Anaemia in pregnancy in the Guinea Savanna of Nigeria. In: Ludwig H, Thomsen K editor(s). Gynecology and Obstetrics. Berlin: Springer‐Verlag, 1986:122‐4.
Fleming AF, Ghatoura GBS, Harrison KA, Briggs ND, Dunn DT. The prevention of anaemia in pregnancy in primigravidae in the guinea savanna of Nigeria. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 1986;80:211‐33.
Harrison KA, Fleming AF, Briggs ND, Rossiter CE. Child‐bearing, health and social priorities: a survey of 22,774 consecutive hospital births in Zaria, Northern Nigeria. 5. Growth during pregnancy in Nigerian teenage primigravidae. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1985;92(5):32‐9.

Fletcher 1971 {published data only}

Fletcher J, Gurr A, Fellingham F, Prankerd T, Brant H, Menzies D. The value of folic acid supplements in pregnancy. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of the British Empire 1971;78:781‐5.

Foulkes 1982 {published data only}

Foulkes J, Goldie DJ. The use of ferritin to assess the need for iron supplements in pregnancy. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1982;3:11‐6.

Freire 1989 {published data only}

Freire WB. Hemoglobin as a predictor of response to iron therapy and its use in screening and prevalence estimates. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1989;50:1442‐9.

Gomber 2002 {published data only}

Gomber S, Agarwal KN, Mahajan C, Agarwal N. Impact of daily versus weekly hematinic supplementation on anemia in pregnant women. Indian Pediatrics 2002;39(4):339‐46.

Goonewardene 2001 {published data only}

Goonewardene M, Liyanage C, Fernando R. Intermittent oral iron supplementation during pregnancy. Ceylon Medical Journal 2001;46(4):132‐5.

Gopalan 2004 {published data only}

Gopalan S, Patnaik R, Ganesh K. Feasible strategies to combat low birth weight and intra‐uterine growth retardation. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition 2004;39(Suppl 1):S37.

Gringras 1982 {published data only}

Gringras M. A comparison of two combined iron‐folic acid preparations in the prevention of anaemia in pregnancy. Journal of International Medical Research 1982;10:268‐70.

Groner 1986 {published data only}

Groner JA, Holtzman NA, Charney E, Mellits ED. A randomized trial of oral iron on tests of short‐term memory and attention span in young pregnant women. Journal of Adolescent Health Care 1986;7:44‐8.

Guldholt 1991 {published data only}

Guldholt IS, Trolle BG, Hvidman LE. Iron supplementation during pregnancy. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 1991;70:9‐12.

Hampel 1974 {published data only}

Hampel K, Roetz R. Influence of a long‐time substitution with a folate‐iron combination in pregnancy on serum folate and serum iron and on hematological parameters. Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde 1974;34:409‐17.

Hawkins 1987 {published data only}

Hawkins DF. Relative efficacy of sustained release iron and iron with folic acid treatment in pregnancy. Personal communication1987.

Hermsdorf 1986 {published data only}

Hermsdorf J, Ring D, Retzke U, Bruschke G. Oral iron prophylaxis during pregnancy. A longitudinal study about hematologic and clinical parameters in treated and non‐treated pregnant women. Proceedings of 10th European Congress of Perinatal Medicine; 1986 August 12‐16; Leipzig, Germany. 1986:84.

Hoa 2005 {published data only}

Hoa PT, Khan NC, Van Beusekom C, Gross R, Conde WL, Khoi HD. Milk fortified with iron or iron supplementation to improve nutritional status of pregnant women: an intervention trial from rural Vietnam. Food & Nutrition Bulletin 2005;26(1):32‐8.

Horgan 1966 {published data only}

Horgan M, Woodliff M, Mangion J. A combined iron and folic‐acid preparation in the prophylaxis of anaemia of pregnancy. Practitioner 1966;197:683‐6.

Hosokawa 1989 {published data only}

Hosokawa K. Studies on anemia in pregnant women: therapeutic efficacy of iron monotherapy vs. combination therapy with iron and vitamin C. Rinsho to Kenkyu (The Japanese Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine) 1989;66(10):3329‐35.

Iyengar 1970 {published data only}

Iyengar L, Apte SV. Prophylaxis of anemia in pregnancy. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1970;23:725‐30.

Kaestel 2005 {published data only}

Kaestel P, Michaelsen KF, Aaby P, Friis H. Effects of prenatal multimicronutrient supplements on birth weight and perinatal mortality: a randomised, controlled trial in Guinea‐Bissau. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2005;59(9):1081‐9.

Kann 1988 {published data only}

Kann J, Lyon JA, Bon C. Availability of iron from four prenatal multivitamin/multimineral products. Clinical Therapeutics 1988;10:287‐93.

Kumar 2005 {published data only}

Kumar A, Jain S, Singh NP, Singh T. Oral versus high dose parenteral iron supplementation in pregnancy. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 2005;89:7‐13.

Madan 1999 {published data only}

Madan N, Prasannaraj P, Rusia U, Sundaram KR, Nath LM, Sood SK. Monitoring oral iron therapy with protoporphyrin/heme ratios in pregnant women. Annals of Hematology 1999;78(6):279‐83.

Mbaye 2006 {published data only}

Mbaye A, Richardson K, Balajo B, Dunyo S, Shulman C, Milligan P, et al. Lack of inhibition of the anti‐malarial action of sulfadoxine‐pyrimethamine by folic acid supplementation when used for intermittent preventive treatment in Gambian primigravidae. American Journal of Tropical Medicine & Hygiene 2006;74(6):960‐4.

McKenna 2002 {published data only (unpublished sought but not used)}

McKenna D, Spence D, Dornan J. A randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial investigating the place of spatone‐iron plus as a prophylaxis against iron deficiency in pregnancy [abstract]. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2002;22(2 Suppl):S45.
McKenna D, Spence D, Haggan SE, McCrum E, Dornan JC, Lappin TR. A randomized trial investigating an iron‐rich natural mineral water as a prophlylaxis against iron deficiency in pregnancy. Clinical and Laboratory Haematology 2003;25:99‐103.

Menon 1962 {published data only}

Menon MKK, Rajan L. Prophylaxis of anaemia in pregnancy. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of the British Commonwealth 1962;12:382‐9.

Milman 2005 {published data only}

Milman N, Bergholt T, Eriksen L, Byg KE, Graudal N, Pedersen P, et al. Iron prophylaxis during pregnancy ‐ how much iron is needed? A randomized dose‐response study of 20‐80 mg ferrous iron daily in pregnant women. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 2005;84:238‐47.
Milman N, Byg KE, Bergholt T, Eriksen L. Side effects of oral iron prophylaxis in pregnancy ‐ myth or reality?. Acta Haematologica 2006;115(1‐2):53‐57.
Milman N, Byg KE, Bergholt T, Eriksen L, Hvas AM. Body iron and individual iron prophylaxis in pregnancy ‐ should the iron dose be adjusted according to serum ferritin?. Annals of Hematology 2006;85(9):567‐73.

Morgan 1961 {published data only}

Morgan EH. Plasma‐iron and haemoglobin levels in pregnancy. Lancet 1961;1:9‐12.
Morgan EH. Plasma‐iron and haemoglobin levels in pregnancy. Personal communication 1987 January 19.

Morrison 1977 {published data only}

Morrison J, Bell J, Chang AMZ, Larkin PK. A comparative trial of haematinic supplements in pregnancy. Medical Journal of Australia 1977;1:482‐4.

Mumtaz 2000 {published data only}

Mumtaz Z, Shahab S, Butt N, Rab MA, DeMuynck A. Daily iron supplementation is more effective than twice weekly iron supplementation in pregnant women in Pakistan in a randomized double‐blind clinical trial. Journal of Nutrition 2000;130(11):2697‐702.

Nguyen 2008 {published data only}

Nguyen P, Nava‐Ocampo A, Levy A, O'Connor DL, Einarson TR, Taddio A, et al. Effect of iron content on the tolerability of prenatal multivitamins in pregnancy. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2008;8:17.

Nogueira 2002 {published data only}

Nogueira NDN, Macedo ADS, Parente JV, Cozzolino SMF. Nutritional profile of newborns of adolescent mothers supplemented with iron, in different concentrations, zinc and pholic acid. Revista de Nutricao 2002;15:193‐200.
Nogueira Ndo N, Parente JV, Cozzolino SM. Changes in plasma zinc and folic acid concentrations in pregnant adolescents submitted to different supplementation regimens. Cadernos de Saude Publica 2003;19(1):155‐60.

Ogunbode 1984 {published data only}

Ogunbode O, Damole IO. Prophylaxis of anaemia in obstetric patients: administration of Ferrograd Folic 500 Plus compared with conventional iron and folic supplementation. Current Therapeutic Research, Clinical and Experimental 1984;35:1043‐8.

Ogunbode 1992 {published data only}

Ogunbode O, Otubu JAM, Akeredolu OO, Akintunde EA, Olatunji PO, Jolayemi ET. The effect of Chemiron capsules on maternal and fetal hematologic indices, including birth weight. Current Therapeutic Research, Clinical and Experimental 1992;51:634‐46.
Ogunbode O, Otubu JAM, Briggs ND, Adeleye JA. Chemiron ‐ A new hematinic preparation. How effective during pregnancy?. Current Therapeutic Research, Clinical & Experimental 1992;51:163‐73.

Ortega‐Soler 1998 {unpublished data only}

Ortega‐Soler CR, Langini SH, Fleishman S, Lopez LB, Garcia M, Guntin R, et al. Iron nutritional status in pregnant women with and without iron supplementation [Estado nutricional con respecto al hierro (Fe) en gestantes con y sin suplementacion]. Personal communication1998.

Osrin 2005 {published data only}

Adhikari R, Manandhar D, Costello A, Tompkins A, Filteau S, Osrin D, et al. The effects of antenatal multiple micronutrient supplementation on birthweight, gestation and infection: a double blind, randomised controlled trial conducted in Nepal: study protocol. MIRA Janakpur Multiple Micronutrient Supplementation2003.
Osrin D, Vaidya A, Shrestha Y, Baniya RB, Manandhar DS, Adhikari RK, et al. Effects of antenatal multiple micronutrient supplementation on birthweight and gestational duration in Nepal: double‐blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005;365:955‐62.

Payne 1968 {published data only}

Payne RW. Prophylaxis of anaemia in pregnancy. Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners 1968;16:353‐8.

Pena‐Rosas 2003 {published data only}

Pena‐Rosas JP, Nesheim M, Garcia‐Casal MN, Crompton DWT, Sanjur D, Viteri FE, et al. Intermittent iron supplementation regimens are able to maintain safe maternal hemoglobin concentrations during pregnancy in Venezuela. Journal of Nutrition 2004;134(5):1099‐104.

Picha 1975 {published data only}

Picha E. Iron treatment by effervescent tablets [Ein neuer Weg der Eisentherapie]. Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde 1975;35(10):792‐5.

Quintero 2004 {unpublished data only}

Quintero Gutierrez AG, Gonzalez Rosendo G, Cedillo Espana F, Rivera‐Dommarco J. Single weekly iron supplementation in pregnant women. Personal communication 2004 February 17.

Ramakrishnan 2003 {published data only}

Ramakrishnan U, Gonzalez‐Cossio T, Neufeld LM, Rivera J, Martorell R. Multiple micronutrient supplementation during pregnancy does not lead to greater infant birth size than does iron‐only supplementation: a randomized controlled trial in a semirural community in Mexico. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2003;77(3):720‐5.

Rayado 1997 {published data only}

Rayado B, Carrillo JA, Fernandez‐Esteban JA, Gomez‐Cedillo A, Martin M, Coronel P. A comparative study of 2 ferrous proteins in the prevention of iron deficiency anaemia during pregnancy. Clinica e Investigacion En Ginecologia y Obstetricia 1997;24:46‐50.

Reddaiah 1989 {published data only}

Reddaiah VP, Raj PP, Ramachandran K, Nath LM, Sood SK, Madan N, et al. Supplementary iron dose in pregnancy anemia prophylaxis. Indian Journal of Pediatrics 1989;56:109‐14.

Roztocil 1994 {published data only}

Roztocil A, Charvatova M, Harastova L, Zahradkova J, Studenik P, Sochorova V, et al. Anti‐anemia therapy with prophylactic administration of fe2+ in normal pregnancy and its effect on prepartum hematologic parameters in the mother and neonate. Ceska Gynekologie 1994;59(3):130‐3.

Rybo 1971 {published data only}

Rybo G, Solvell L. Side‐effect studies on a new sustained release iron preparation. Scandinavian Journal of Hematology 1971;8(4):257‐64.

Sandstad 2003 {published data only}

Sandstad B, Borch‐Iohnson B, Andersen GM, Dahl‐Jorgensen B, Froysa I, Leslie C, et al. Selective iron supplementation based on serum ferritin values early in pregnancy: are the Norwegian recommendations satisfactory?. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 2003;82:537‐42.

Seck 2008 {published data only}

Seck BC, Jackson RT. Determinants of compliance with iron supplementation among pregnant women in Senegal. Public Health Nutrition 2008;11(6):596‐605.

Shatrugna 1999 {published data only}

Shatrugna V, Raman L, Kailash U, Balakrishna N, Rao KV. Effect of dose and formulation on iron tolerance in pregnancy. National Medical Journal of India 1999;12(1):18‐20.

Simmons 1993 {published data only}

Simmons WK, Cook JD, Bingham KC, Thomas M, Jackson J, Jackson M, et al. Evaluation of a gastric delivery system for iron supplementation in pregnancy. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1993;58:622‐6.

Sjostedt 1977 {published data only}

Sjostedt JE, Manner P, Nummi S, Ekenved G. Oral iron prophylaxis during pregnancy ‐ a comparative study on different dosage regimens. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 1977;66:3‐9.

Sood 1979 {published data only}

Sood SK, Ramachandran K, Rani K, Ramalingaswami V, Mathan VI, Ponniah J, et al. WHO sponsored collaborative studies on nutritional anaemia in India. The effect of parenteral iron administration in the control of anaemia of pregnancy. British Journal of Nutrition 1979;42:399‐406.

Steer 1992 {published data only}

Steer PJ. Trial to assess the effects of iron and folate supplementation on pregnancy outcome [trial abandoned]. Personal communication1992.

Stone 1975 {published data only}

Stone M, Elder MG. The relative merits of a slow‐release and a standard iron preparation during pregnancy. Current Medical Research and Opinion 1975;3:469‐72.

Suharno 1993 {published data only}

Suharno D, West CE, Karyadi D, Hautvast JGA. Supplementation with vitamin A and iron for nutritional anaemia in pregnant women in West Java, Indonesia. Lancet 1993;342:1325‐8.

Tampakoudis 1996 {published data only}

Tampakoudis P, Tantanassis T, Tsatalas K, Lazaridis E, Tsalikis T, Venetis C, et al. A randomized trial on the effect of oral supplementation with iron protein succinylate in singleton pregnancies. The role of maternal erythropoietin as a marker. Prenatal and Neonatal Medicine 1996;1 Suppl 1:181.

Tan 1995 {published data only}

Tan CH, Ng KB. The effect of oral iron on the haemoglobin concentration during the second half of pregnancy. 27th British Congress of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1995 July 4‐7; Dublin, Ireland. Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists, 1995:101.

Tange 1993 {published data only}

Tange E, Weigand E, Mbofung CM. Effect of iron supplementation on anemic and non‐anemic pregnant teenagers in Cameroon. TEMA 8: Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium on Trace Elements in Man and Animals; 1993 May 16‐22; Dresden, Germany. 1993:220‐3.

Thane‐Toe 1982 {published data only}

Thane‐Toe, Thein‐Than. The effects of oral iron supplementation on ferritin levels in pregnant Burmese women. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1982;35(1):95‐9.

Tholin 1993 {published data only}

Tholin K, Hallmans G, Sandstrom B, Goop M, Palm R, Abrahamsson M. Serum zinc, iron supplementation and pregnancy outcome. TEMA 8: Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium on Trace Elements in Man and Animals; 1993 May 16‐22; Dresden, Germany. 1993:894‐5.
Tholin K, Sandstrom B, Palm R, Hallmans G. Changes in blood manganese levels during pregnancy in iron supplemented and non supplemented women. Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology 1995;9(1):13‐7.

Thomsen 1993 {published data only}

Thomsen JK, Prien‐Larsen JC, Devantier A, Fogh‐Andersen N. Low dose iron supplementation does not cover the need for iron during pregnancy. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 1993;72:93‐8.

Vogel 1963 {published data only}

Vogel L, Steingold L, Suchet J. Iron therapy in the treatment of anaemia in pregnancy. Lancet 1963;1:1296‐9.

Wali 2002 {published data only}

Wali A, Mushtaq A, Nilofer. Comparative study‐‐efficacy, safety and compliance of intravenous iron sucrose and intramuscular iron sorbitol in iron deficiency anemia of pregnancy. Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association 2002;52(9):392‐5.

Willoughby 1966 {published data only}

Willoughby M, Jewell F. Investigation of folic acid requirements in pregnancy. British Medical Journal 1966;2:1568‐71.

Willoughby 1968 {published data only}

Willoughby MLN, Jewell FG. Folate status throughout pregnancy and in postpartum period. British Medical Journal 1968;4:356‐60.

Wu 1998 {published data only}

Wu Y, Weng L, Wu L. Clinical experience with iron supplementation in pregnancy. Chung‐Hua Fu Chan Ko Tsa Chih [Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology] 1998;33(4):206‐8.

Zhou 2007 {published data only}

Zhou SJ, Gibson RA, Crowther CA, Makrides M. Should we lower the dose of iron when treating anaemia in pregnancy? A randomized dose‐response trial. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2007 Oct 10; Vol. [Epub ahead of print].

Zittoun 1983 {published data only}

Zittoun J, Blot I, Hill C, Zittoun R, Papiernik E, Tchernia G. Iron supplements vs placebo during pregnancy: its effects on iron and folate status on mothers and newborns. Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism 1983;27:320‐7.

Zutshi 2004 {published data only}

Zutshi V, Batra S, Ahmad SS, Khera N, Chauhan G, Gandhi G, et al. Injectable iron supplementation instead of oral therapy for antenatal care. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 2004;54(1):37‐8.

Bhatla 2009 {published data only}

Bhatla N, Kaul N, Lal N, Kriplani A, Agarwal N, Saxena R, et al. Comparison of effect of daily versus weekly iron supplementation during pregnancy on lipid peroxidation. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research 2009;35(3):438‐45.

Zeng 2008 {published data only}

Li Q, Yan H, Zeng L, Cheng Y, Liang W, Dang S, et al. Effects of maternal multimicronutrient supplementation on the mental development of infants in rural western China: follow‐up evaluation of a double‐blind, randomized, controlled trial. Pediatrics 2009;123(4):e685‐e692.
Yan H. Impact of iron/folate versus multi‐micronutrient supplementation during pregnancy on birth weight: a randomised controlled trial in rural Western China. Current Controlled Trials (www.controlled‐trials.com) (accessed 15 February 2007)2007.
Zeng L, Dibley MJ, Cheng Y, Dang S, Chang S, Kong L, et al. Impact of micronutrient supplementation during pregnancy on birth weight, duration of gestation, and perinatal mortality in rural western China: double blind cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2008;337:a2001.

Cogswell 2006 {published data only}

Cogswell ME. Impact of prenatal vitamin/mineral supplements on perinatal mortality. www.clinicaltrials.gov (accessed 21 March 2006).

Hemminki 2008 {published data only}

Hemminki E. Routine iron prophylaxis during pregnancy (PROFEG). ClinicalTrials.gov (http://clinicaltrials.gov/) (accessed 20 February 2008).
Parkkali S, Abacassamo F, Salome G, Augusto O, Nikula M, on behalf of the PROFEG‐group. Routine iron prophylaxis during pregnancy. Effects on maternal and child health in Maputo City and the urban part of Maputo Province, Mozambique. Report of a pilot study. Profeg Group, 2007.

Anderson 1991

Anderson SA, editor. In: Anderson SA editor(s). Guidelines for the assessment and management of iron deficiency in women of childbearing age. Bethesda, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, 1991:1‐36.

Anderson 2005

Anderson GJ, Frazer DM, McKie AT, Vulpe CD, Smith A. Mechanisms of haem and non‐haem iron absorption: lessons from inherited disorders of iron metabolism. Biometals 2005;18(4):339‐48.

Beard 2000

Beard J. Effectiveness and strategies of iron supplementation during pregnancy. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2000;71(5):1288S‐1294S.

Beaton 1999

Beaton GH, McCabe G. Efficacy of intermittent iron supplementation in the control of iron deficiency anaemia in developing countries. An analysis of experience. The Micronutrient Initiative, 1999.

Beaton 2000

Beaton GH. Iron needs during pregnancy: do we need to rethink our targets?. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2000;72(1 Suppl):265S‐271S.

Bothwell 1981

Bothwell TH, Charlton RW, editors. Iron deficiency in women. Washington DC: Nutrition Foundation, 1981.

Bothwell 2000

Bothwell TH. Iron requirements in pregnancy and strategies to meet them. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2000;72(1 Suppl):257S‐264S.

Casanueva 2003b

Casanueva E, Viteri FE. Iron and oxidative stress in pregnancy. Journal of Nutrition 2003;133(5):1700S‐1708S.

CDC 1998

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Recommendations to prevent and control iron deficiency in the United States. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 1998;47(RR‐3):1‐29.

Chaparro 2006

Chaparro CM, Neufeld LM, Tena Alavez G, Eguia‐Líz Cedillo R, Dewey KG. Effect of timing of umbilical cord clamping on iron status in Mexican infants: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2006;367(9527):1997‐2004.

Chaparro 2007

Chaparro C. Essential delivery care practices for maternal and newborn health and nutrition. Informational Bulletin; Pan American Health Organization, Washington D.C.2007:1‐4.

Cook 2003

Cook JD, Flowers CH, Skikne BS. The quantitative assessment of body iron. Blood 2003;101(9):3359‐64.

Crompton 2002

Crompton DW, Nesheim MC. Nutritional impact of intestinal helminthiasis during the human life cycle. Annual Review of Nutrition 2002;22:35‐59.

Erslev 2001

Erslev AJ. Clinical manifestations and classification of erythrocyte disorders. In: Beutler E, Litchman MA, Coller BS, Kipps TJ, Seligsohn U editor(s). William's hematology. 6th Edition. New York, NY, USA: McGraw Hill, 2001:369‐74. [ISBN 0‐07‐070397‐3]

Frazer 2003a

Frazer DM, Anderson GJ. The orchestration of body iron intake: how and where do enterocytes receive their cues?. Blood Cells Molecules and Disease 2003;30(3):288‐97.

Frazer 2003b

Frazer DM, Wilkins SJ, Becker EM, Murphy TL, Vulpe CD, McKie AT, et al. A rapid decrease in the expression of DMT1 and Dcytb but not Ireg1 or hephaestin explains the mucosal block phenomenon of iron absorption. Gut 2003;52(3):340‐6.

Gallery 1979

Gallery EDM, Hunyor SN, Gyory AZ. Plasma volume contraction: a significant factor in both pregnancy‐associated hypertension (pre‐eclampsia) and chronic hypertension in pregnancy. Quarterly Journal of Medicine 1979;48:593‐602.

Galloway 1994

Galloway R, McGuire J. Determinants of compliance with iron supplementation: supplies, side effects, or psychology?. Social Science and Medicine 1994;39(3):381‐90.

Garn 1981

Garn SM, Ridella SA, Petzold AS, Falkner F. Maternal hematologic levels and pregnancy outcomes. Seminars in Perinatology 1981;5:155‐62.

Gleason 2007

Gleason G, Scrimshaw NS. An overview of the functional significance if iron deficiency. In: Kraemer K, Zimmermann MB editor(s). Nutritional Anemia. Vol. 1, Basel, Switzerland: Sight and Life, 2007:45‐58.

Godfrey 1991

Godfrey KM, Redman CW, Barker DJ, Osmond C. The effect of maternal anaemia and iron deficiency on the ratio of fetal weight to placental weight. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1991;98(9):886‐91.

Goodlin 1981

Goodlin RC, Quaife MA, Dirksen JW. The significance, diagnosis, and treatment of maternal hypovolemia as associated with fetal/maternal illness. Seminars in Perinatology 1981;5(2):163‐74.

Haider 2006

Haider BA, Bhutta ZA. Multiple‐micronutrient supplementation for women during pregnancy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004905.pub2]

Higgins 2008

Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 5.0.0 [updated February 2008]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2008. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org.

Huisman 1986

Huisman A, Aarnoudse JG. Increased 2nd trimester hemoglobin concentration in pregnancies later complicated by hypertension and growth retardation. Early evidence of a reduced plasma volume. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 1986;65(6):605‐8.

Hunt 2002

Hunt JM. Reversing productivity losses from iron deficiency: the economic case. Journal of Nutrition 2002;132(4 Suppl):794S‐801S.

Hytten 1964

Hytten FE, Leitch I. The physiology of human pregnancy. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1964:14.

Hytten 1971

Hytten FE, Leitch I, Baird D. The physiology of human pregnancy. 2nd Edition. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1971:1‐43.

Hytten 1985

Hytten F. Blood volume changes in normal pregnancy. Clinics in Haematology 1985;14(3):601‐12.

INACG 1977

International Anaemia Consultative Group (INACG). Guidelines for the eradication of iron deficiency anaemia. A report of the International Nutritional Anaemia Consultative Group. Washington, DC: The Nutrition Foundation. Washington DC: The Nutrition Foundation, 1977:1‐29.

INACG 1998

Stoltzfus R, Dreyfuss M. Guidelines for the use of iron supplements to prevent and treat iron deficiency anaemia. Washington DC: ILSI Press, 1998.

INACG 2002a

International Anemia Consultative Group. Anemia, iron deficiency and iron deficiency anemia. INACG, 2002.

INACG 2002b

International Anemia Consultative Group (INACG). Why is iron important and what to do about it: a new perspective. Report of the 2001 INACG Symposium; 2001 February 15‐16; Hanoi, Vietnam. 2002:1‐50.

IOM 1993

Institute of Medicine. Iron deficiency anemia: recommended guidelines for the prevention, detection, and management among U.S. children and women of childbearing age. Washington DC: National Academy Press, 1993.

IOM 2001

Institute of Medicine. Iron. Dietary reference intakes for vitamin A, vitamin K, arsenic, boron, chromium, copper, iodine, iron, manganese, molybdenum, nickel, silicon, vanadium, and zinc. Washington DC: National Academy Press, 2001:290‐393.

Kandoi 1991

Kandoi A, Bhatia BD, Pandey LK, Pandey S, Sen PC, Satya K. Cellular immunity status in anaemia in pregnancy. Indian Journal of Medical Research 1991;94:11‐5.

Kim 1992

Kim I, Hungerford DW, Yip R, Kuester SA, Zyrkowski C, Trowbridge FL. Pregnancy nutrition surveillance system‐‐United States, 1979‐1990. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 1992;41(7):25‐41.

Klebanoff 1989

Klebanoff MA, Shiono PH, Berendes HW, Rhoads GG. Facts and artifacts about anemia and preterm delivery. JAMA 1989;262(4):511‐5.

Klebanoff 1991

Klebanoff MA, Shiono PH, Selby JV, Trachtenberg AI, Graubard BI. Anemia and spontaneous preterm birth. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1991;164(1):59‐63.

Koller 1979

Koller O, Sagen N, Ulstein M, Vaula D. Fetal growth retardation associated with inadequate haemodilution in otherwise uncomplicated pregnancy. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 1979;58(1):9‐13.

Letsky 1991

Letsky E. The haematological system. In: Hytten F, Chamberlain G editor(s). Clinical physiology in obstetrics. 2nd Edition. Oxford UK: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1991:39‐86.

LeVeen 1980

LeVeen HH, Ip M, Ahmed N, Mascardo T, Guinto RB, Falk G, et al. Lowering blood viscosity to overcome vascular resistance. Surgery, Gynecology and Obstetrics 1980;150(2):139‐49.

Lozoff 2006

Lozoff B, Jimenez E, Smith JB. Double burden of iron deficiency in infancy and low socioeconomic status: a longitudinal analysis of cognitive test scores to age 19 years. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine 2006;160(11):1108‐13.

Lumley 2003

Lumley J, Watson L, Watson M, Bower C. Periconceptional supplementation with folate and/or multivitamins for preventing neural tube defects. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2001, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001056]

Lund 1961

Lund CJ. Studies on the iron deficiency anemia of pregnancy; including plasma volume, total hemoglobin, erythrocyte protoporphyrin in treated and untreated normal and anemic patients. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1961;62(5):947‐63.

Mahomed 1989

Mahomed K, Hytten F. Iron and folate supplementation in pregnancy. In: Chalmers I editor(s). Effective care in pregnancy and childbirth. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1989:301‐7.

Mahomed 1997

Mahomed K. Folate supplementation in pregnancy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 1997, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000183]

Mahomed 1998a

Mahomed K. Iron and folate supplementation in pregnancy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 1998, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001135]

Mahomed 2000a

Mahomed K. Iron supplementation in pregnancy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2000, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000117]

McLean 2007

McLean E, Egli I, Cogswell M, De Benoist B, Wojdyla D. Worldwide prevalence of anemia in preschool age children, pregnant women and non‐pregnant women of reproductive age. In: Kraemer K, Zimmermann MB editor(s). Nutritional Anemia. Vol. 1, Basel, Switzerland: Sight and Life Press, 2007:1‐12.

Mercer 2001

Mercer JS. Current best evidence: a review of the literature on umbilical cord clamping. Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health 2001;46(6):402‐14.

Milman 2007

Milman N, Bergholt T, Byg KE, Eriksen L, Hvas AM. Reference intervals for haematological variables during normal pregnancy and postpartum in 434 healthy Danish women. European Journal of Haematology 2007;79(1):39‐46.

Mora 2002

Mora JO. Iron supplementation: overcoming technical and practical barriers. Journal of Nutrition 2002;132(4 Suppl):853S‐855S.

Murphy 1986

Murphy JF, O'Riordan J, Newcombe RG, Coles EC, Pearson JF. Relation of haemoglobin levels in first and second trimesters to outcome. Lancet 1986;3(1):992‐5.

Nair 2004

Nair KM, Bhaskaram P, Balakrishna N, Ravinder P, Sesikeran B. Response of hemoglobin, serum ferritin, and serum transferrin receptor during iron supplementation in pregnancy: a prospective study. Nutrition 2004;20(10):896‐9.

Oppenheimer 2001

Oppenheimer SJ. Iron and its relation to immunity and infectious disease. Journal of Nutrition 2001;131:616S‐635S.

Pena‐Rosas 2006

Pena‐Rosas JP, Viteri FE. Effects of routine oral iron supplementation with or without folic acid for women during pregnancy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006, Issue 3. [Art. No.: CD004736. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004736.pub2]

Poulsen 1990

Poulsen HF, Mortensen PE. Hemoglobin concentration prior to the 20th week of pregnancy correlated with complications in the third trimester. Ugeskrift for Laeger 1990;152(14):1010‐1.

Prema 1982

Prema K, Ramalakshmi BA, Madhavapeddi R, Babu S. Immune status of anaemic pregnant women. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1982;89:222‐5.

Reveiz 2007

Reveiz L, Gyte GML, Cuervo LG. Treatments for iron‐deficiency anaemia in pregnancy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2007, Issue 2. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003094.pub2]

RevMan 2008 [Computer program]

The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). Version 5.0. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2008.

Rumbold 2005

Rumbold A, Crowther CA. Vitamin C supplementation in pregnancy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004072.pub2]

Scanlon 2000

Scanlon KS, Yip R, Schieve LA, Cogswell ME. High and low hemoglobin levels during pregnancy: differential risks for preterm birth and small for gestational age. Obstetrics & Gynecology 2000;96(5 Pt 1):741‐8.

Scholl 1992

Scholl TO, Hediger, ML, Fischer RL, Shearer JW. Anaemia vs. iron deficiency: increased risk of preterm delivery in a prospective study. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1992;55:985‐8.

Scholl 1997

Scholl TO, Hediger ML, Bendich A, Schall JI, Smith WK, Krueger PM. Use of multivitamin/mineral prenatal supplements: influence on the outcome of pregnancy. American Journal of Epidemiology 1997;146:134‐41.

Scholl 1998

Scholl TO. High third‐trimester ferritin concentration: associations with very preterm delivery, infection, and maternal nutritional status. Obstetrics & Gynecology 1998;92:161‐6.

Scholl 2000

Scholl TO, Reilly T. Anemia, iron and pregnancy outcome. Journal of Nutrition 2000;130(Suppl 2):443S‐447S.

Scholl 2005

Scholl TO. Iron status during pregnancy: setting the stage for mother and infant. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2005;81(5):1218S‐1222S.

Silver 1998

Silver HM, Seebeck MA, Carlson R. Comparison of total blood volume in normal, preeclamptic, and nonproteinuric gestational hypertensive pregnancy by simultaneous measurements of red blood cell and plasma volumes. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1998;179:87‐93.

Srigiridhar 2001

Srigiridhar K, Nair KM, Subramanian R, Singotamu L. Oral repletion of iron induces free radical mediated alterations in the gastrointestinal tract of rat. Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry 2001;219:91‐8.

Srigirihar 1998

Srigiridhar K, Nair KM. Iron‐deficient intestine is more susceptible to peroxidative damage during iron supplementation in rats. Journal of Free Radicals in Biology & Medicine 1998;25:660‐5.

Steer 1995

Steer P, Alam MA, Wadsworth J, Welch A. Relation between maternal haemoglobin concentration and birth weight in different ethnic groups. BMJ 1995;310(6978):489‐91.

Steer 2000

Steer PJ. Maternal hemoglobin concentration and birth weight. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2000;71(5 Suppl):1285S‐1287S. [MEDLINE: 10799403]

Van den Broek 2002

Van den Broek N, Kulier R, Gülmezoglu AM, Villar J. Vitamin A supplementation during pregnancy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2002, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001996]

van Rheenen 2004

van Rheenen P, Brabin BJ. Late umbilical cord‐clamping as an intervention for reducing iron deficiency anaemia in term infants in developing and industrialised countries: a systematic review. Annals of Tropical Paediatrics 2004;24(1):3‐16.

Villar 1997

Villar J, Bergsjo P. Scientific basis for the content of routine antenatal care. I. Philosophy, recent studies and power to eliminate or alleviate adverse maternal outcomes. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 1997;76(1):1‐14.

Villar 2003

Villar J, Merialdi M, Gulmezoglu AM, Abalos E, Carroli G, Kulier R, et al. Nutritional interventions during pregnancy for the prevention or treatment of maternal morbidity and preterm delivery: an overview of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Nutrition 2003;5(Suppl 2):1606S‐1625S.

Viteri 1995

Viteri FE, Liu XN, Martin A, Tolomei K. True absorption and retention of supplemental iron is more efficient when administered every three days rather than daily to iron‐normal and iron‐deficient rats. Journal of Nutrition 1995;125:82‐91.

Viteri 1997

Viteri FE. Iron supplementation for the control of iron deficiency in populations at risk. Nutrition Reviews 1997;55:195‐209.

Viteri 1998

Viteri FE. A new concept in the control of iron deficiency: community‐based preventive supplementation of at‐risk groups by the weekly intake of iron supplements. Biomedical and Environmental Sciences 1998;11(1):46‐60.

Viteri 1999a

Viteri FE, Mendoza C, Guiro A, Hercberg S, Galan P. Daily and weekly supplementation and reference‐dose iron (Fe) absorption in Berkeley, Ca. and Dakar, Senegal. FASEB Journal 1999;13:A536.4.

Viteri 1999b

Viteri FE. Iron supplementation as a strategy for the control of iron deficiency and ferropenic anemia. Archivos Latinoamericanos de Nutricion 1999;49 Suppl:S15‐S22.

WHO 1992

World Health Organization. The prevalence of anaemia in women: a tabulation of available information. 2nd Edition. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1992.

WHO 2001

World Health Organization. Iron deficiency anemia assessment prevention and control: a guide for program managers. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2001:132.

WHO 2006

WHO. Iron and Folate Supplementation. Standards for Maternal and Neonatal Care. Integrated Management of Pregnancy and Childbirth (IMPAC). Vol. 1.8, Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization. Department of Making Pregnancy Safer (MPS), 2006:1‐6.

WHO/CDC 2005

WHO, CDC. Assessing the iron status of populations. Report of a joint World Health Organization/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention technical consultation on the assessment of iron status at the population level. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2005:1‐30.

Xiong 2000

Xiong X, Buekens P, Alexander S, Demianczuk N, Wollast E. Anemia during pregnancy and birth outcome: a meta‐analysis. American Journal of Perinatology 2000;17(3):137‐46.

Zhou 1998

Zhou LM, Yang WW, Hua JZ, Deng CQ, Tao X, Stoltzfus RJ. Relation of hemoglobin measured at different times in pregnancy to preterm birth and low birth weight in Shanghai, China. American Journal of Epidemiology 1998;148(10):998‐1006.

Mahomed 1998b

Mahomed K. Iron and folate supplementation in pregnancy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 1998, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001135]

Mahomed 2000b

Mahomed K. Iron supplementation in pregnancy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2000, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000117]

Peña‐Rosas 2006

Peña‐Rosas JP, Viteri FE. Effects of routine oral iron supplementation with or without folic acid for women during pregnancy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006, Issue 3. [Art. No.: CD004736. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004736.pub2]

Characteristics of studies

Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]

Barton 1994

Methods

Randomisation: adequate by means of computer‐generated numbers. Allocation concealment: adequate. Blinding: adequate. Participant and care provider blinded. Loss to follow up: adequate. Less than 5%.

Participants

97 healthy women attending prenatal care at National Maternity Hospital, Dublin, Ireland with singleton pregnancy, during their first trimester of pregnancy, and with haemoglobin equal or higher than 140 g/L were assigned to the groups. Women were excluded if they had a recent blood transfusion, chronic respiratory disease, chronic hypertension, renal disease, diabetes mellitus, history of haematologic disorder and alcohol dependence.

Interventions

Women were randomly assigned to one of two groups: group 1: received iron and folic acid tablets, one tablet to be taken by mouth twice daily (each tablet contained 0.5 mg of folic acid and 60 mg elemental iron); group 2: placebo tablets also to be taken by mouth twice daily.
Supplementation started at 12 wks until delivery. No postpartum supplementation.

Outcomes

Maternal: haemoglobin, hematocrit, serum erythropoietin concentrations at baseline and at 24, 28, 32, 36 and 40 wk; serum ferritin at baseline and at 36 wk; number of hypertensive disorders, antepartum haemorrhage, cesarean delivery.
Infant: perinatal death, birthweight below 10th percentile, Apgar score, need for neonatal resuscitation and admission to neonatal intensive care unit data recorded but not reported in paper. Cord blood values of haemoglobin, hematocrit, serum ferritin, and erythropoietin concentrations.

Notes

Unsupervised.
No participants were withdrawn because of anaemia.
Compliance not reported.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Low risk

Adequate by means of computer‐generated numbers.

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

Adequate.

Blinding?
All outcomes

Low risk

Adequate.

Incomplete outcome data addressed?
All outcomes

Low risk

Adequate ‐ less than 5% lost to follow up.

Batu 1976

Methods

Randomisation: unclear ‐ method not stated. Allocation concealment: unclear. Blinding: unclear ‐ participant blinded. Provider/assessor not stated or clear. Loss to follow up: inadequate ‐ 37 women (28%) were excluded for analysis.

Participants

133 women referred to investigators from a population of women attending an antenatal clinic for the fist time in Yangoon (also known as Rangoon), Myanmar (Burma). Women with severe anaemia were excluded from the trial during the intervention for treatment.

Interventions

Women were randomly assigned to one of four groups starting at 22‐25 wks: group 1: one ferrous sulphate tablet containing 60 mg of elemental iron, and one placebo tablets twice daily; group 2: one tablet containing 60 mg of elemental iron as ferrous sulphate, and one tablet containing 0.5 mg of folic acid twice daily; group 3: two placebo tablets twice daily; group 4: one placebo tablet and one tablet containing 0.5 mg of folic acid twice daily. Administration of the treatments was carefully supervised. Supplementation started at 22‐25 wks until term.

Outcomes

Maternal: haemoglobin concentrations at baseline, at term (38‐40th wk) and 4‐7 wk postpartum, serum iron, serum and red cell folate activity and hypersegmented polimorph count at baseline, at 38‐40th wk and postpartum.

Notes

Supervised. 32 women who had taken other supplements or whose Hb level at full term was not available were excluded from the analysis. Three women from group 3 and two from group 4 developed severe anaemia and were also withdrawn from analysis.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Unclear risk

Unclear ‐ method not stated.

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

Unclear.

Blinding?
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Unclear ‐ participant blinded. Provider/assessor not stated or clear.

Incomplete outcome data addressed?
All outcomes

High risk

Inadequate ‐ 37 women (28%) were excluded for analysis.

Butler 1968

Methods

Randomisation: adequate by means of a randomised list stratified by age, parity and initial haemoglobin level. Allocation concealment: adequate. Numbered bottles of tablets and code was broken after study completed for group 1 and 2. Blinding: inadequate. Participant and provider were blinded to treatment for groups 1 and 2. The control group did not get a placebo. Loss to follow up: inadequate ‐ more than 20% were lost to follow up to the postnatal visit.

Participants

200 women before 20th week of gestation and Hb above 100 g/L attending antenatal clinic at the Maternity Hospital in Glossop Terrace, Cardiff, England, United Kingdom were studied. Exclusion criteria included urinary infection and threatened miscarriage, confusion over therapy, intercurrent illness and difficult veins, intolerant to the iron form, premature labor.

Interventions

Women were randomly allocated to three groups: group 1: received 122 mg of elemental iron as ferrous sulphate daily; group 2: received 122 mg of elemental iron as ferrous sulphate plus 3.4 mg of folic acid daily; group 3: no treatment. A group 4 was formed as some subjects (n = 38) from group 3 received iron supplements for treatment of anaemia in the course of the intervention. They are excluded for analysis. Women were supplemented from week 20 to week 40 of gestation.

Outcomes

Maternal: haemoglobin concentrations, blood and plasma volume, haematocrit (not reported), red cell volume, albumin and globulin fractions, oedema, intrapartum haemorrhage.

Notes

Unsupervised.
154 women were followed through to the postnatal visit. Only 16 women (30%) in the no treatment group remained untreated.
Compliance not reported.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Low risk

Adequate by means of a randomised list stratified by age, parity and initial haemoglobin level.

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

Adequate.

Blinding?
All outcomes

High risk

Inadequate. Participant and provider were blinded to treatment for groups 1 and 2. The control group did not get a placebo.

Incomplete outcome data addressed?
All outcomes

High risk

Inadequate ‐ more than 20% were lost to follow up to the postnatal visit.

Buytaert 1983

Methods

Randomisation: adequate by random table numbers. Allocation concealment: adequate by means of sealed envelopes. Blinding: inadequate. Participant nor provider blinded. No placebo used. Loss to follow‐up: adequate ‐ less than 20% lost to follow up.

Participants

45 non‐anaemic women with singleton pregnancy and no major illnesses attending the University Hospital Obstetric and Gynaecologic Clinic in Antwerp, Belgium.

Interventions

Women were randomly assigned to one of two groups:
group 1: received 105 mg of elemental iron as ferrous sulphate daily in a sustained release preparation and group 2: received no iron supplement.
Supplementation started at 14‐16th week of gestation and continued until delivery.

Outcomes

Maternal: haemoglobin, serum iron, serum transferrin and serum ferritin concentrations at 16, 28, 36 wks, delivery and 6 wks postpartum.

Notes

Unsupervised. The randomisation was made for each clinic in Antwerp, and the results are presented separately by clinic. Compliance not reported.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Low risk

Adequate ‐ by random table numbers.

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

Adequate, by means of sealed envelopes.

Blinding?
All outcomes

High risk

Inadequate. Participant nor provider blinded. No placebo used.

Incomplete outcome data addressed?
All outcomes

Low risk

Adequate ‐ less than 20% lost to follow up

Cantlie 1971

Methods

Randomisation: unclear. method not stated. Allocation concealment: unclear. Blinding: unclear. Not specified. Loss to follow up: unclear. Not reported.

Participants

27 apparently healthy non‐anaemic pregnant women 17‐35 years of age from 4 participating obstetricians' private practice clinics from Montreal, Canada in their 1‐5th month of pregnancy with Hb 12 g/dL or higher in first trimester and 11 g/dL or higher in second trimester. Women with history of pathological blood loss or gross dietary imbalance were excluded.

Interventions

Women were randomly assigned to two groups: group 1 received 39 mg elemental iron to be taken twice daily with meals (total daily 78 mg elemental iron) or group 2 who received no iron tablets. Both groups received one tablet of multivitamin supplement daily containing: copper citrate 2 mg, magnesium stearate 6 mg, manganese carbonate 0.3 mg, vitamin A 1000 IU, vitamin D 500 IU, bone flour 130 mg, vitamin B1 1 mg, vitamin B2 1 mg, brewer yeast concentrate 50 mg, niacinamide 5 mg, vitamin C 25 mg, sodium iodide 0.2 mg and folate 0.049 ug (naturally occurring). Duration of supplementation unclear.

Outcomes

Maternal: Hb concentration, packed cell volume, reticulocyte count, sedimentation rate, total white blood cell and differential counts, serum iron, unsaturated and total iron binding capacity, serum B12, serum and RBC folate at baseline and at 32, 36, 39th wks and 7 days postpartum.

Notes

Supervision unclear.
Compliance not reported.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Unclear risk

Unclear ‐ method not stated.

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

Unclear.

Blinding?
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Unclear.

Incomplete outcome data addressed?
All outcomes

High risk

Inadequate ‐ not reported.

Chanarin 1971

Methods

Randomisation: inadequate ‐ quasi‐randomised study, assignment by sequence. Allocation concealment: inadequate. Blinding: adequate. Participant and provider blinded. Loss to follow up: adequate ‐ less than 20%.

Participants

251 women attending antenatal clinic at St Mary's Hospital, London, England, United Kingdom before 20th week of gestation.

Interventions

Women were allocated by sequence to one of five groups: group 1: oral dose of 30 mg of elemental iron daily; group 2: oral dose of 60 mg of elemental iron daily; group 3: oral dose of 120 mg of elemental iron daily; group 4: placebo; group 5: 1 g of iron (Imferon, 4 x 250 mg) intravenously before week 20, and thereafter oral 60 mg of elemental iron as ferrous fumarate daily (not included in this review). Oral elemental iron provided as ferrous fumarate.
Supplementation started at 20th week until 37th week. Only the data related to comparisons of group 1: oral dose of 30 mg of elemental iron daily with group 4: placebo are used in this review given that no data for the other groups could be desegregated.

Outcomes

Maternal: full blood count, serum iron at 20, 25, 30 and 37th week. Sternal marrow aspiration at 37 wks; antepartum haemorrhage, threatened abortion, urinary tract infection, fetal abnormalities, pregnancy hypertension, premature delivery and puerperal infection measured but not reported by groups.
Infant: birthweight (not reported by groups).

Notes

Compliance not reported.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

High risk

Inadequate ‐ quasi‐randomised study, assignment by sequence.

Allocation concealment?

High risk

Inadequate.

Blinding?
All outcomes

Low risk

Adequate. Participant and provider blinded.

Incomplete outcome data addressed?
All outcomes

Low risk

Adequate ‐ less than 20%.

Charoenlarp 1988

Methods

Randomisation: adequate, using a set of random tables. Allocation concealment: unclear. Blinding: unclear ‐ participant and outcome assessor blinded. Provider blinding unclear. Loss to follow up: adequate. Ranged from 10%‐15%.

Participants

325 pregnant women with Hb (AA) and 232 pregnant women with Hb (AE) attending midwife centres in 80 villages from the Varin Chamrab district of Ubon Province, Thailand. Chronic illness, complicated pregnancy, severe anaemia (Hb < 80 g/L), haemoglobinopathies Hb (EE) and (EF), and unwillingness to cooperate were reason for exclusion. Individuals with Hb (AA) have normal hemoglobin genes. Individuals with Hb (AE) have a heterozygous Hb E trait with normal Hb gene (A‐adults) and an abnormal Hb gene (E). This is usually a clinically insignificant condition.

Interventions

Women were divided into two groups according to Hb (AA) and Hb (AE) and studied separately. Women from each group were randomly assigned to one of the following interventions: group 1: placebo, supervised; group 2, 120 mg of elemental iron and 5 mg folic acid daily supervised; group 3, 240 mg of elemental iron daily supervised; group 4: 240 mg of elemental iron daily supervised; group 5: 120 mg elemental iron and 5 mg of folic acid, motivated but unsupervised; and group 6: 240 mg of elemental iron and 5 mg of folic acid daily, motivated but unsupervised. For the Hb (AE) group, women were randomly assigned to one of the following groups: group 7: placebo, supervised; group 8: 240 mg elemental iron and 5 mg of folic acid daily, supervised; group 9: 240 mg of elemental iron daily, supervised; group 10: 120 mg of elemental iron and 5 mg of folic acid daily, motivated but unsupervised, and group 11: 240 mg of elemental iron and 5 mg of folic acid daily, motivated but unsupervised. Elemental iron was given as ferrous sulphate.
Starting and ending time of supplementation not stated.

Outcomes

Maternal: haemoglobin, serum ferritin after 10 and 15 wks of supplementation, and side effects.

Notes

Groups 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9 supervised. Groups 5, 6, 10 and 11 motivated but unsupervised. For purposes of analysis, the groups were merged by iron alone or iron‐folic acid, and included as daily higher doses in both cases.
Compliance not reported.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Low risk

Adequate, using a set of random tables.

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

Unclear

Blinding?
All outcomes

Low risk

Unclear ‐ participant and outcome assessor blinded. Provider blinding unclear.

Incomplete outcome data addressed?
All outcomes

Low risk

Adequate. Ranged from 10%‐15%.

Chew 1996a

Methods

Randomisation: adequate ‐ by computerised random numbers. Allocation concealment: adequate by sealed envelopes. Blinding: inadequate ‐ participant, care provider and outcome assessor not blinded. Loss to follow up: inadequate ‐ more than 20% lost to follow up.

Participants

256 clinically healthy pregnant women from low socio‐economic status attending one antenatal care clinic in Guatemala City, Guatemala and Hb > 80 g/L were recruited. City of Guatemala is at 1500 m above sea level, so values were adjusted by altitude subtracting 5 g/L in Hb.

Interventions

Women were randomly assigned to one of two groups: group 1: daily supervised intake of 60 mg elemental iron and 500 ug folic acid; group 2: weekly supervised intake of 180 mg of elemental iron and 3.5 mg of folic acid in one intake once a week. Iron given as ferrous sulphate.
Supplementation started at different gestational age for each participant. Average gestational age at start was 20.5 wks until 38th wk.

Outcomes

Maternal: haemoglobin concentration at baseline and at term (38th week of gestation); side effects and total iron intake.
Infant: birthweight.

Notes

Supervised.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Low risk

Adequate ‐ by computerised random numbers.

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

Adequate, by sealed envelopes.

Blinding?
All outcomes

High risk

Inadequate ‐participant, care provider and outcome assessor not blinded.

Incomplete outcome data addressed?
All outcomes

High risk

Inadequate ‐ more than 20% lost to follow up.

Chew 1996b

Methods

Randomisation: adequate by computerised random numbers. Allocation concealment: adequate by sealed envelopes. Blinding: inadequate. Participant and provider not blinded. Outcome assessor for laboratory blinded to groups. Loss to follow up: inadequate.

Participants

120 clinically healthy pregnant women attending one antenatal care clinic in Guatemala City, Guatemala with Hb >80 g/L were recruited. Women were from low SES. City of Guatemala is 1500 m above sea level, so values were adjusted by altitude subtracting 5 g/L in Hb.

Interventions

Women from low SES were randomly assigned to one of two groups: group 3: daily unsupervised intake of 60 mg elemental iron as ferrous sulphate and 500 ug folic acid; or group 4: weekly unsupervised intake of 180 mg of elemental iron as ferrous sulphate and 3.5 mg of folic acid in one intake once a week.
Supplementation started at an average of 20.5 wks of gestation until 38th wk.

Outcomes

Maternal: haemoglobin concentration at baseline and at term (38th week of gestation); side effects and total iron intake.
Infant: birthweight.

Notes

Unsupervised.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Low risk

Adequate, by computerised random numbers.

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

Adequate, by sealed envelopes.

Blinding?
All outcomes

High risk

Inadequate. Participant and provider not blinded.

Incomplete outcome data addressed?
All outcomes

High risk

Inadequate

Chisholm 1966

Methods

Randomisation: method unclear. Allocation concealment: adequate. Bottles containing the tablets had been numbered by random selection at source and the code was unknown during trial. Blinding: adequate. participant and provider blinded. Loss to follow up: adequate. No losses to follow up.

Participants

360 non‐anaemic women attending antenatal clinic at Ridcliffe Infirmary, Oxford, England United Kingdom before 28th week of gestation, who had not taken iron supplements in the preceding 8 wks and with Hb >= 102 g/L or a normal serum iron reading. Exclusion criteria: Hb < 110 g/L and serum iron less than 60 ug/L.

Interventions

Women were randomly assigned to one of various combinations of elemental iron as ferrous gluconate and folic acid, as follows:
group 1: 900 mg elemental iron alone daily; group 2: 900 mg elemental iron and 500 ug folic acid daily; group 3: 900 mg elemental iron and 5 mg folic acid daily; group 4: placebo; group 5: 500 ug folic acid daily; group 6: 5 mg of folic acid daily. Iron and folic acid placebos were used.
Supplementation started at 28th week until 40th week.

Outcomes

Maternal: haemoglobin, haematocrit, serum iron, serum folic acid activity, serum vitamin B12 estimation at 28 wks of gestation and predelivery.

Notes

Unsupervised.
For purposes of this review, placebo group was the group who received neither iron nor folic acid. Groups 2 and 3 were merged for iron‐folic acid comparisons.
Compliance not reported.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Unclear risk

Method unclear.

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

Adequate. Bottles containing the tablets had been numbered by random selection at source and the code was unknown during trial.

Blinding?
All outcomes

Low risk

Adequate. Participant and provider blinded.

Incomplete outcome data addressed?
All outcomes

Low risk

Adequate. No losses to follow up.

Christian 2003

Methods

Randomisation: adequate. Cluster randomisation. Allocation concealment: adequate. Coded. Blinding: adequate. Participant, provider and outcome assessors blinded. Loss to follow up: inadequate. More than 20% losses to follow up.

Participants

4998 married pregnant women (with positive pregnancy test) living in the south eastern plains district of Sarlahi, Nepal. Widows were excluded.

Interventions

Women were randomly assigned to one of five groups: group 1 received 1000 ug retinol equivalents vitamin A (control) daily; group 2 received 1000 ug retinol equivalents vitamin A and 400 ug folic acid daily; group 3 received 1000 ug retinol equivalents vitamin A, 400 ug folic acid and 60 mg elemental iron as ferrous fumarate daily; group 4 received 1000 ug retinol equivalents vitamin A, 400 ug folic acid, 60 mg of elemental iron as ferrous fumarate and 30 mg of zinc sulphate daily; and group 5 received 1000 ug retinol equivalents vitamin A, 400 ug folic acid, 60 mg elemental iron as ferrous fumarate, 30 mg of zinc, 10 ug vitamin D, 10 mg vitamin E, 1.6 mg thiamine, 1.8 mg riboflavin, 20 mg niacin, 2.2 mg vitamin B6, 2.6 ug vitamin B12, 100 mg vitamin C, 65 ug vitamin K, 2 mg cooper, and 100 mg magnesium daily. Only groups 1 and three are considered in this review. Supplementation started at recruitment and continued until 3 month post‐partum in the case of live births of 5 wks or more after a miscarriage or stillbirth. All participating women were offered deworming treatment (albendazole 400 mg single dose) in the second and third trimester.
Supplementation lasted 257.5 days in group 1 (control) and 251.7 days in the group 3 receiving vitamin A, iron and folic acid.
Comparisons: group 3 vs group 1: effect of iron supplementation with folic acid; group 3 vs group 2: effect of iron supplementation alone.

Outcomes

Maternal: premature delivery, Hb and iron status at baseline in the third trimester and Hb at 6 wk postpartum, prevalence of anemia in third trimester and at 6 wk postpartum, severe anemia postpartum, moderate anaemia during third trimester, moderate anaemia postpartum, moderate haemoconcentration during third trimester
Infant: birth weight, prevalence of low birth weight, perinatal mortality, neonatal mortality, infant deaths, small for gestational age.

Notes

Unsupervised but trial personnel visited women twice each week to monitor supplement intake.
Compliance during pregnancy measured by pill count was high (median 88%) and did not vary by groups.
98% of the women accepted the albendazole treatment at both times (second and third trimesters)

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Low risk

Adequate. Cluster randomisation.

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

Adequate. Coded.

Blinding?
All outcomes

Low risk

Adequate ‐ participant, provider and outcome assessors blinded.

Incomplete outcome data addressed?
All outcomes

High risk

Inadequate. More than 20% losses to follow up.

Cogswell 2003

Methods

Randomisation: adequate by computerised random numbers. Allocation concealment: adequate. Blinding: adequate ‐ participant and care provider blinded. Outcome assessor unclear. Loss to follow up: inadequate ‐ more than 20% lost to follow up.

Participants

275 legally competent, non‐imprisoned, non‐anaemic, low‐income pregnant women at < 20 wks of gestation with ferritin levels above 20 ug/L enrolled at the Cuyahoga County, MetroHealth Center, Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children in Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

Interventions

Women were randomly assigned to one of two groups: group 1 received 1 gelatin capsule containing 30 mg of elemental iron as ferrous sulphate daily; group 2 received 1 placebo soft gelatin capsule daily for 119 days.
Supplementation started at an average of 11 wks of gestation until delivery.

Outcomes

Maternal: prevalence of anaemia at 28 and 38 wks, side effects, compliance to treatment, maternal weight gain, iron status (mean cell volume, haemoglobin concentration, serum ferritin, erythrocyte protoporphyrin concentrations at 28 and 38 wks.
Infant: birthweight, birth length, proportion of low birthweight, low birthweight and premature, small‐for‐gestational age.

Notes

Unsupervised. Women were re‐evaluated at 28 wks of gestation, and according to haemoglobin concentrations at that time were prescribed treatment following the Institute of Medicine guidelines for iron supplementation during pregnancy.
Compliance was 63.4% and 65.2% in groups 1 and 2 respectively.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Low risk

Adequate, by computerised random numbers.

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

Adequate

Blinding?
All outcomes

Low risk

Adequate ‐ participant and care provider blinded. Outcome assessor unclear.

Incomplete outcome data addressed?
All outcomes

High risk

Inadequate ‐ more than 20% lost to follow up.

De Benaze 1989

Methods

Randomisation: unclear ‐ randomised but method used unclear. Allocation concealment: adequate. Blinding: adequate. Participant and provider blinded. Loss to follow up: adequate ‐ less than 20%.

Participants

191 non‐anaemic pregnant women with 12‐18 wks of gestation attending antenatal care clinic at the Maternity at Poissy Hospital, Paris, France. Exclusion criteria included women who had taken iron or folate supplements in the prior 6 months and those with language barriers for proper communication.
Supplementation started at 12‐18 wks until delivery.

Interventions

Women were randomly allocated to one of 2 groups: group 1: daily intake of 45 mg of elemental iron as ferrous betainate hydrochloride (15 mg elemental iron per tablet) and group 2: placebo tablets.

Outcomes

Maternal: haemoglobin, MCV, serum iron, total iron binding capacity, transferrin saturation, serum ferritin at baseline, at 5 months, at 7 months, at delivery and 2 months postpartum.

Notes

Unsupervised.
Serum ferritin values presented as arithmetic and geometric means. No standard deviation in transformed ferritin values is presented. Women in the placebo group were prescribed treatment after delivery thus not allowing comparisons at 2 months postpartum among the groups.
Compliance reported as good.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Unclear risk

Unclear ‐ randomised but method used unclear.

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

Adequate.

Blinding?
All outcomes

Low risk

Adequate. Participant and provider blinded.

Incomplete outcome data addressed?
All outcomes

Low risk

Adequate, less than 20%.

Ekstrom 2002

Methods

Randomisation: adequate by cluster. Allocation concealment: inadequate ‐ not used. Blinding: inadequate ‐ neither participant nor provider blinded. Outcome assessor unclear. Loss to follow up: inadequate ‐ more than 20% loss to follow up.

Participants

209 apparently healthy women attending antenatal care clinics in rural areas of Mymemsingh thana, Bangladesh, with fundal height of 14‐22 cm (18‐24 wks of gestation), who had not used iron supplements prior to the study. Exclusion criteria: women with haemoglobin concentrations < 80 g/L.

Interventions

Each clinic was randomly assigned to one of two interventions: 60 mg of elemental iron as ferrous sulphate and 250 ug folic acid given in one tablet daily, or 120 mg of elemental iron as ferrous sulphate and 500 ug folic acid once a week (given in two tablets one day of the week). Supplementation continued until 6 wks postpartum.
Supplementation started at baseline for 12 wks.

Outcomes

Maternal: haemoglobin concentration at baseline and after 12 wks of supplementation. Compliance, side‐effects, serum ferritin and serum transferrin receptors at 6 wks postpartum.

Notes

Unsupervised.
Cluster randomisation used among 52 antenatal clinics: n = 25 to daily supplementation and n = 25 to weekly supplementation. Two antenatal care units ceased operation during the trial period.
Compliance was 104% and 68% for weekly and daily groups respectively. The compliance above 100% for the weekly means that more tablets that were indicated to be taken were ingested in the period of time.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Low risk

Adequate by cluster.

Allocation concealment?

High risk

Not used.

Blinding?
All outcomes

High risk

Inadequate ‐ neither participant nor provider blinded. Outcome assessor unclear.

Incomplete outcome data addressed?
All outcomes

High risk

Inadequate ‐ more than 20% loss to follow up.

Eskeland 1997

Methods

Randomisation: adequate ‐ computer generated. Allocation concealment: adequate ‐ central allocation at trials office, sequentially numbered. Blinding: adequate ‐ participant and care provider blinded. Loss to follow up: inadequate. 23% and 21% in groups included.

Participants

90 healthy non‐anaemic pregnant women with singleton pregnancy of less than 13 wks, attending an inner city maternity centre in Bergen, Norway and willing to participate. Exclusion criteria: uncertain gestational age according to menstrual history, haemoglobin concentration < 110 g/L, chronic disease or pregnancy complications (hypertension, diabetes, bleeding), multiple pregnancy, liver enzymes out of normal range and logistic difficulties foreseen at baseline (moving out of area).

Interventions

Women were randomly allocated to one of the following: group 1: three tablets containing 1.2 mg heme iron from porcine blood and 9 mg of elemental iron as ferrous fumarate (Hemofer®) and one placebo tablet (total 27 mg elemental iron a day); group 2: one tablet containing 27 mg elemental iron as iron fumarate with 100 mg vitamin C (Collet®) and three placebo tablets; or group 3: four placebo tablets.
Supplementation started at 20th week until 38‐40th week.

Outcomes

Maternal: haemoglobin, erythrocytes count, haematocrit, mean corpuscular volume, mean corpuscular haemoglobin, mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration, reticulocytes, serum iron, total iron binding capacity, serum transferrin, erythrocyte protoporphyrin at baseline and at 20, 28, 38 wks, 8 wks postpartum, and 6 months postpartum; pregnancy complications: hypertension, pre‐eclampsia, forceps, postpartum haemorrhage, maternal wellbeing and breastfeeding duration.
Infant: birthweight and length.

Notes

Unsupervised.
Only groups 1 and 3 (placebo) were included in this review.
Compliance was 81% and 82% in groups 1 and 3 respectively.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Low risk

Adequate, computer generated.

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

Adequate

Blinding?
All outcomes

Low risk

Adequate ‐ participant and care provider blinded.

Incomplete outcome data addressed?
All outcomes

High risk

Inadequate. 23% and 21% in groups included.

Hankin 1963

Methods

Randomisation: inadequate ‐ alternate by day of the week. Allocation concealment: inadequate. Blinding: inadequate. Open. Loss to follow up: adequate. Less than 5% excluded.

Participants

174 primigravidae or secundigravidae at their first visit at the antenatal Clinic of Queen Elizabeth Hospital in Woodville, Australia with ability to write and speak English.

Interventions

Women were divided into a supplemented group receiving a daily dose of 100 mg of elemental iron as ferrous gluconate or a control group that was unsupplemented.
Supplementation started during 2nd trimester and ending time is unclear.

Outcomes

Maternal: haemoglobin and haematocrit at 20‐30 wk, 30‐40 wk, at 5 days, at 6 wk and at 3 months postpartum.
Infant: haemoglobin from umbilical cord, at 6 wk, at 3 months and at 6 months of age (not reported).

Notes

Unsupervised.
Compliance not reported.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

High risk

Inadequate ‐ quasi‐randomised, alternate by day of the week.

Allocation concealment?

High risk

Inadequate.

Blinding?
All outcomes

High risk

Inadequate. Open.

Incomplete outcome data addressed?
All outcomes

Low risk

Adequate. Less than 5% excluded.

Harvey 2007

Methods

Randomisation: adequate. Allocation concealment: adequate ‐ supplied in coded opaque bottles. Blinding: inadequate ‐ participant blinded. Care provider and outcome assessor unblinded. Loss to follow up: adequate. No losses to follow up.

Participants

13 apparently healthy non‐anemic non‐smokers pregnant women aged 18‐40 years and < 14 wks of gestation with singleton pregnancy recruited through local medical practitioners and the Maternity Department of the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, England, United Kingdom.

Interventions

Women were randomly assigned to one of two groups: group 1 received 100 mg elemental iron as ferrous gluconate daily after food and group 2 received a placebo. Supplementation started at 16th week of gestation until delivery.

Outcomes

Maternal: haemoglobin, serum ferritin, transferrin receptor, plasma zinc, exchangeable zinc pool, zinc excretion and zinc absorption at 16, 24 and 34 wks of gestation.
Infant: birth weight (not reported).

Notes

Unsupervised.
Compliance not reported.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Low risk

Adequate.

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

Adequate, supplied in coded opaque bottles.

Blinding?
All outcomes

High risk

Inadequate ‐ participant blinded. Care provider and outcome assessor unblinded.

Incomplete outcome data addressed?
All outcomes

Low risk

Adequate ‐ no losses to follow up.

Hemminki 1991

Methods

Randomisation: adequate. Random codes created by computer in blocks of ten by maternity centre. Allocation concealment: adequate. Sealed numbered envelopes stored in containers from which midwives were asked to take them in order. Blinding: inadequate ‐ neither participants nor provider blinded. Outcome assessor blinded. Loss to follow up: adequate ‐ less than 5% lost to follow up.

Participants

2994 pregnant women with less than 16 wks of gestation attending 15 communal maternity centres and 12 centres in five neighbouring communities in Tampere, Finland who consented to participate. Exclusion criteria included: chronic illness, anemia (hematocrit under 0.32 or Hb <110 g/L), late arrival, likelihood of moving away from the area before child birth, or twin pregnancies.

Interventions

Women were randomly assigned to one of two policy groups: group 1 (routine) were recommended to take 100 mg elemental iron alone (iron compounds and dosage varied as per midwife recommendation) daily after the 16th week gestation; or group 2 (selective) who received no iron supplements. Women in the selective group who had a haematocrit of < 0.30 (Hb < 100 g/L) on two consecutive visits were provided 100 mg elemental iron (as ferrous sulphate) to be taken one tablet (50 mg) twice a day for two months or until haematocrit increased to 0.31 (Hb 100 g/L)

Outcomes

Maternal: Haematocrit at 28th and 36th week gestation, weight increase (kg), systolic and systolic blood pressure at 36th wk, proteinuria, haematocrit at 28th and 36th wk gestation,  overall estimation of health, symptoms of tiredness, sick days, fever, adverse effects from iron supplements, symptoms related to iron supplements, duration of first stage of labor, C‐section, blood transfusion, fever I hospital, postpartum stay in hospital for more than 7 days, not breastfeeding in postpartum check up, spontaneous abortions, length of gestation in wk, proportion of premature births.

Infant: birth weight, low birth weight, death, perinatal mortality, 1 min Apgar score < 7, special care unit, malformations, infections, hiperviscosity as a discharge diagnosis, weight gain, overall health.

Notes

Average iron intake in the routine group was 124 mg elemental iron a day. 32 women were excluded: 20 twin pregnancies, 4 discovered not to be pregnant, and 8 for other (unintentional) reasons. Of the remaining 2912, 218 participants miscarried. Final samples were therefore 2694: 1336 women in the routine iron group and 1358 women in the selective group.

The limit to prescribe treatment on the selective group was changed in the middle of the study to haematocrit <0.31 (Hb < 105 g/L) after the 33rd wk of gestation.

Compliance assessed daily through self reporting. Women in the routine group who reported not having taken the iron supplements during the preceding two wks was only 8.2% at 28th week gestation and 14% at 36 wks.

It is reported that 7.4% of mothers in the selective group (i.e. no iron unless anaemic) reported having taken iron either regularly or "every now and then" in the preceding two wks, at 28th wk gestation, while this proportion increased to 14% in the 36th wk.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Low risk

Adequate. Random codes created by computer in blocks of ten by maternity centre.

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

Adequate ‐ sealed numbered envelopes stored in containers from which midwives were asked to take them in order.

Blinding?
All outcomes

High risk

Inadequate ‐ neither participants nor provider blinded. Outcome assessor blinded.

Incomplete outcome data addressed?
All outcomes

Low risk

Adequate ‐ less than 5% lost to follow up.

Free of selective reporting?

Low risk

Holly 1955

Methods

Randomisation: unclear. Allocation concealment: unclear. Blinding: inadequate ‐ neither participants nor provider blinded. Outcome assessor unclear. Loss to follow up: unclear.

Participants

207 pregnant women with less than 26 wks of gestation and Hb > 100 g/L attending antenatal care clinic in Nebraska, USA.

Interventions

Women were randomly assigned to one of 3 groups: group 1 received 1 g of an iron salt daily; group 2 received 0.8‐1.2 g of ferrous sulphate and 60‐90 mg of cobalt chloride daily, and group 3 received no treatment.
Supplementation started at various times before 26th week of gestation for each of the subjects until delivery.

Outcomes

Maternal: haemoglobin, haematocrit, serum iron, erythrocyte protoporphyrin at 3‐6 months and pre‐delivery.

Notes

Unsupervised.
Three iron salts (n = 94) were used: ferrous gluconate (n = 40), ferrous sulphate (n = 32) and Mol‐Iron® (n = 22). The iron treated groups with different iron salts were merged together by the author as iron treated group since the results were comparable. The iron and cobalt treatment group is not included in this review.
Compliance not reported.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Unclear risk

Unclear.

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

Unclear.

Blinding?
All outcomes

High risk

Inadequate ‐ neither participants nor provider blinded.

Incomplete outcome data addressed?
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Unclear.

Hood 1960

Methods

Randomisation: unclear. Allocation concealment: unclear. Blinding: inadequate ‐ neither participant nor provider blinded. Outcome assessor unclear. Loss to follow up: adequate. Less than 20%.

Participants

75 consecutive apparently healthy pregnant women with 32‐34 wks of gestation attending the maternity clinic at St Anthony's Hospital, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA.

Interventions

Women were randomly divided in three groups: group 1 served as control and received no treatment; group 2 received 220 mg elemental iron as ferrous sulphate daily; and group 3 received 55 mg elemental iron as sustained release ferrous sulphate daily.
Supplementation started at 32‐34 week of gestation until delivery.

Outcomes

Maternal: haemoglobin, haematocrit, incidence and severity of side effects on a weekly basis until delivery.

Notes

Unsupervised.
Group 2 is recorded as higher daily dose and group 3 as low daily dose. For any iron versus no treatment comparison groups were merged.
Compliance not reported.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Unclear risk

Unclear.

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

Unclear.

Blinding?
All outcomes

High risk

Inadequate ‐ neither participant nor provider blinded. Outcome assessor unclear.

Incomplete outcome data addressed?
All outcomes

Low risk

Adequate. Less than 20% losses to follow up.

Kerr 1958

Methods

Randomisation: adequate by cards shuffle. Allocation concealment: unclear. Blinding: inadequate ‐ participant blinded. Provider blinded to treatments but not to controls. Outcome assessor unclear. Loss to follow up: inadequate. 23% of participants were lost to follow up.

Participants

430 apparently healthy women with 24‐25 wks of singleton pregnancy and Hb equal or above 104 g/L attending antenatal clinic at Simpson Memorial Maternity Pavillion, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom.

Interventions

Women were randomly allocated to one of 4 groups: group 1 received 35 mg of elemental iron as ferrous sulphate three times a day; group 2 received 35 mg of elemental iron as ferrous gluconate three times a day; group 3 received 35 mg of elemental iron as ferrous gluconate with 25 mg of ascorbic acid, three times a day; group 4 received placebo.
Supplementation started at 24‐25th week of gestation until term.

Outcomes

Maternal: haemoglobin, red cell count, haematocrit at baseline and at 37th week.

Notes

Unsupervised.
Groups 1 and 2 were merged for analysis. Group 3 was not used in this review.
Compliance not measured.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Low risk

Adequate by cards shuffle.

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

Unclear.

Blinding?
All outcomes

High risk

Inadequate ‐ participant blinded. Provider blinded to treatments but not to controls. Outcome assessor unclear.

Incomplete outcome data addressed?
All outcomes

High risk

Inadequate. 23% of participants were lost to follow up.

Lee 2005

Methods

Randomisation: adequate. Allocation concealment: unclear. Blinding: inadequate: subject, provider and outcome assessor unclear. Loss to follow up: adequate: more than 80% of participants were included in the analysis. 16.2% of participants were lost to follow up.

Participants

154 apparently healthy pregnant women seeking prenatal care in Gwangju, South Korea during first trimester of pregnancy who did not receive other supplements or medications throughout pregnancy and who were willing to participate.

Interventions

Women were randomly allocated to one of 5 groups: group 1 received 30 mg elemental iron and 175 ug folic acid daily from first trimester until delivery; group 2 received 60 mg of elemental iron with 350 ug of folic acid from first trimester until delivery; group 3 received 30 mg elemental iron and 175 ug of folic acid from 20th week of gestation until delivery; group 4 received 60 mg elemental iron and 350 ug of folic acid from 20th week of gestation until delivery; or control group with no supplement. Elemental iron was given as ferrous sulphate.

Outcomes

Maternal: haemoglobin, haematocrit, serum ferritin, serum soluble transferrin receptor concentrations at baseline and during first, second, third trimester of pregnancy and at delivery.

Notes

Unsupervised.
Compliance not reported.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Low risk

Adequate.

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

Unclear.

Blinding?
All outcomes

High risk

Unclear: subject, provider and outcome assessor blinding unclear.

Incomplete outcome data addressed?
All outcomes

Low risk

Adequate ‐ less than 20% lost to follow up.

Liu 1996

Methods

Randomisation: method unclear. Non‐supplemented group was self‐selected.
Allocation concealment: adequate by sealed closed envelopes. Blinding: inadequate. Neither participant nor provider blinded. Outcome assessor blinded. Follow up: adequate ‐ less than 20% lost to follow up.

Participants

395 healthy, anaemic and non anaemic, pregnant women attending prenatal care at 2 outpatient clinics at Changji Hospital and Shihezi Maternal and Child Health Station in Xianjiang, China. Women with Hb < 80 g/L were excluded. Maternal age was 25.15 ± 2.28 years.

Interventions

Women were randomly assigned to one of 3 groups: group 1: 60 mg elemental iron as ferrous sulphate and 0.25 mg of folic acid daily; group 2: 120 mg of elemental iron as ferrous sulphate and 0.5 mg of folic acid daily; group 3: 120 mg elemental iron as ferrous sulphate and 0.5 mg of folic acid once weekly. A control group that received no iron was composed of women who did not want to participate in the study and did not receive any iron supplements.

Outcomes

Maternal: haemoglobin concentration at 3, 5, 8 months and at term; serum ferritin concentrations at 3 months and at term in a subgroup; side effects.
Weight at entry and at term (not used in the review).

Notes

Unsupervised.
Iron supplementation is not mandatory for women in China, if they have a Hb concentration > 80 g/L.
Compliance for group 1 (daily 60 mg Fe), group 2 (daily 120 mg Fe) and group 3 (weekly 20 mg Fe) were 77%, 75% and 86% respectively.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

High risk

Method unclear. Non‐supplemented group was self‐selected.

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

Adequate by sealed closed envelopes.

Blinding?
All outcomes

High risk

Inadequate. Neither participant nor provider blinded. Outcome assessor blinded.

Incomplete outcome data addressed?
All outcomes

Low risk

Adequate ‐ less than 20% lost to follow up.

Makrides 2003

Methods

Randomisation: adequate by means of computer generated with balanced blocks and stratified for parity. Allocation concealment:adequate ‐ opaque bottles marked with sequential numerical code prepared by the Pharmacy Department of Women's & Children's Hospital. Blinding: adequate ‐ participant and care provider blinded. Loss to follow up: adequate. Less than 20% lost to follow up.

Participants

430 non‐anaemic pregnant women attending antenatal clinics at Women's and Children's Hospital in Adelaide, Australia with singleton or twin pregnancies and informed consent. Exclusion criteria: diagnosis of thalassaemia, history of drug or alcohol abuse and history of vitamin and mineral preparations containing iron prior to enrolment in study.

Interventions

Women were randomly assigned to receive one tablet containing 20 mg of elemental iron daily between meals from week 20 until delivery or a placebo tablet.

Outcomes

Maternal: haemoglobin concentration at 28 wk, at delivery, and at 6 months postpartum; ferritin concentration at delivery and at 6 months postpartum; maternal gastrointestinal side effects at 24 and 36 wk of gestation; serum zinc at delivery and at 6 month postpartum; maternal well being at 36 wk of gestation, at 6 wk and at 6 months postpartum; pregnancy outcomes: type of birth, blood loss at delivery, gestational age. At 4 years postpartum: general health of mothers using the SF‐36, a self administered questionnaire that assesses 8 concepts of health.
Infant: birthweight, birth length, birth head circumference, Apgar scores, and level of nursery care. Follow up at 4 years: intelligence quotient (IQ) using Stanford‐Binet Intelligence Scale, child behaviour using Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire parent report form.

Notes

Unsupervised but monthly phone calls to encourage compliance.
If anaemia was detected in the routine 28 wk blood sample or if the clinician considered her Hb too low the woman was advised to purchase and take a high‐dose iron supplement (containing > 80 mg elemental iron per tablet) until the end of pregnancy.
Compliance was 86% and 85% in the iron and placebo groups respectively.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Low risk

Adequate by means of computer generated with balanced blocks and stratified for parity.

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

Aadequate, opaque bottles marked with sequential numerical code prepared by the Pharmacy Department of Women's & Children's Hospital.

Blinding?
All outcomes

Low risk

Adequate ‐ participant and care provider blinded.

Incomplete outcome data addressed?
All outcomes

Low risk

Adequate. Less than 20% lost to follow up.

Meier 2003

Methods

Randomisation: adequate stratified by age group. Allocation concealment: unclear. Blinding: adequate. Participant and provider blinded. Outcome assessor unclear. Loss to follow up: inadequate. More than 20% lost to follow up.

Participants

144 non‐iron deficient adolescents 15‐18 years old in their first pregnancy and adult women 19 or older in their first or greater pregnancy attending prenatal care at Marshfield Clinic, Wisconsin, USA.

Interventions

Women were randomly assigned to receive once daily 60 mg of elemental iron as ferrous sulphate or a placebo. All women received 1 mg of folic acid daily.

Outcomes

Maternal: prevalence of iron deficiency anaemia, compliance to treatment, side effects, vomiting, nausea, constipation, diarrhoea, C‐section, serum ferritin and haemoglobin concentrations at 24‐28 wk gestation and at 36‐40 wk gestation.
infant: perinatal morbidity and mortality, birth weight, birth length, Apgar scores at 1 and 5 minutes, admission to neonatal unit, prevalence of birthweight.

Notes

Unsupervised.
All adolescents and adult pregnant women who developed iron deficiency anaemia at 24‐28 wk gestation were offered 60 mg elemental iron three times a day.
Compliance was assessed through pill counts and ranged from 32% to 124% (median 95.5% in iron supplemented group and 87.4% in placebo group.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Low risk

Adequate stratified by age group.

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

Unclear.

Blinding?
All outcomes

Low risk

Adequate. Participant and provider blinded. Outcome assessor unclear.

Incomplete outcome data addressed?
All outcomes

High risk

Inadequate. More than 20% lost to follow up.

Menendez 1994

Methods

Randomisation: unclear ‐ randomised but method unclear. Allocation concealment: inadequate. Blinding: inadequate. Participant and provider not blinded. Outcome assessor blinded. Loss to follow up: inadequate. More than 20% lost to follow up.

Participants

550 multi gravidae pregnant women with less than 34 wks of gestation attending antenatal care clinics in 18 villages near the town of Farafenni, in North Bank Division, Gambia where malaria is endemic with high transmission during 4‐5 months a year.

Interventions

Women were allocated randomly by compound of residence to receive 60 mg of elemental iron as ferrous sulphate or placebo. All pregnant women received a weekly tablet of 5 mg of folic acid but no antimalarial chemoprophylaxis.
Supplementation started at 23‐24 wks until delivery.

Outcomes

Maternal: haemoglobin concentrations at baseline, 4‐6 wks before delivery and one week postpartum; plasma iron, total iron binding capacity, transferrin saturation, deposition of malaria pigment in placenta.
Infant: birthweight within 7 days of delivery.

Notes

Unsupervised.
Malaria prophylaxis is provided to primigravidae in The Gambia. Thirty women with PCV less than 25% after enrolment (17 in iron group and 13 in placebo) were treated and withdrawn from study and analysis. Additionally 29 women (7 in iron and 22 in placebo group) had PCV below 25% at the second visit and were also withdrawn from study.
Compliance: estimated tablet consumption was 81.1 and 81.7 tablets in the iron and placebo groups respectively.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Unclear risk

Unclear ‐ randomised but method unclear.

Allocation concealment?

High risk

Inadequate.

Blinding?
All outcomes

High risk

Inadequate. Participant and provider not blinded. Outcome assessor blinded.

Incomplete outcome data addressed?
All outcomes

High risk

Inadequate. More than 20% lost to follow up.

Milman 1991

Methods

Randomisation: method unclear. Allocation concealment: unclear. Blinding: adequate. Participant and provider blinded. Outcome assessor unclear. Loss to follow up: adequate. Less than 20% lost to follow up.

Participants

248 healthy Caucasian Danish women attending Birth Clinic in Copenhagen, Denmark within 9‐18 wks of gestation and normal pregnancy. Exclusion criteria: complicated delivery, excessive smoking (> 9 cigarettes/day).

Interventions

Women were randomly assigned to receive 66 mg of elemental iron as ferrous fumarate daily (n = 121) or placebo (n = 127) until delivery.
Supplementation started at 8‐9th week until delivery.

Outcomes

Maternal: haemoglobin, haematocrit, erythrocyte indices, iron status, serum ferritin, serum transferrin saturation, serum erythropoietin at baseline and every 4th week until delivery, and 1‐8 wks after delivery in sub sample; pregnancy complications.
Infant: birthweight, serum ferritin, transferrin saturation and serum erythropoietin in umbilical cord.

Notes

Unsupervised.
Of the 248 women, 20 placebo and 21 iron treated were excluded by the authors in some of the analysis for the following reasons: withdrawn consent, 10; uterine bleeding episodes, 5; placental insufficiency, placenta praevia and abruptio placentae, 7; pre‐eclampsia, 3; partus prematurus, 5; excessive smoking, 3. Sample size has been adjusted for intention to treat ITT.
Compliance: number of tablets consumed was 159 +/‐ 38 and 93 +/‐43 tablets in the iron treated and placebo groups respectively.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Unclear risk

Method unclear.

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

Unclear.

Blinding?
All outcomes

Low risk

Adequate. Participant and provider blinded. Outcome assessor unclear.

Incomplete outcome data addressed?
All outcomes

Low risk

Adequate. Less than 20% lost to follow up.

Mukhopadhyay 2004

Methods

Randomisation: adequate. computer generated random numbers. Block randomisation (block size = 10). Allocation concealment: inadequate ‐ not used. Blinding: inadequate. Open to participants, care providers and outcome assessor. Loss to follow up: inadequate. More than 20% excluded.

Participants

111 apparently healthy pregnant women with less than 20 wks and no prior intake of iron supplements during this pregnancy with Hb equal or higher than 100 g/L and singleton pregnancy in New Delhi, India. Women who were taking anti‐epileptics or anti‐thyroid medications, had history of menorrhagia, bleeding disorders, chronic peptic ulcers, bleeding piles, thalassaemia or other haemoglobinopathies, or history of haemorrhage in present or past pregnancies were excluded.

Interventions

Women were randomly assigned to one of two groups: group 1 received two tablets of 100 mg elemental iron and 500 ug folic acid each (total 200 mg iron and 1000 ug folic acid), to be taken only once a week, one tablet before lunch and another tablet before dinner; group 2 received one tablet of 100 mg elemental iron and 500 ug folic acid daily. Women were advised to take the supplements 30 minutes before the meals and not with tea, coffee or milk. Also, women were advised to take calcium supplements after meals (500 mg elemental calcium twice daily). Iron supplementation started between 14 and 20 wks until delivery. Deworming, if required, was carried out with Mebendazole 100 mg twice a day for 3 days in the second trimester.

Outcomes

Maternal: Hb, serum ferritin concentrations at baseline and at 32‐34 wks, prevalence of anaemia, compliance to treatment, presence of intestinal parasites.
Infant: birth weight.

Notes

Unsupervised.
Compliance measured by pill count and interview. compliance was 85% in group 1 (intermittent) and 40% in group 2 (daily).

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Low risk

Adequate. computer generated random numbers. Block randomisation (block size=10).

Allocation concealment?

High risk

Not used.

Blinding?
All outcomes

High risk

Inadequate ‐ open to participants, care providers and outcome assessor.

Incomplete outcome data addressed?
All outcomes

High risk

Inadequate. More than 20% excluded.

Paintin 1966

Methods

Randomisation: method unclear. Allocation concealment: adequate ‐ sequentially numbered. Blinding: adequate ‐ participant and provider blinded. Loss to follow up: adequate ‐ less than 5%.

Participants

180 primigravidae women with less than 20 wk gestation and Hb > 100 g/L attending antenatal clinic in Aberdeen Maternity Hospital, Scotland, United Kingdom.

Interventions

Women were randomly assigned to one of three groups: group 1 received 3 tablets containing 4 mg elemental iron each (total 12 mg daily); group 2 received 3 tablets containing 35 mg elemental iron (total 105 mg elemental iron daily) and group 3 received placebo. Intervention was from week 20 to week 36 of gestation.

Outcomes

Maternal: haemoglobin, haematocrit at baseline, and at wks 20, 30, 36 of gestation and 7‐13 days postpartum; plasma volume at 30 wks, total red cell volume, serum iron and total iron binding capacity at 30 wks, subjective health and side effects at 30 wks.

Notes

Unsupervised.
Compliance estimated by measuring tablets returned. Authors report good compliance.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Unclear risk

Method unclear.

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

Adequate, sequentially numbered.

Blinding?
All outcomes

Low risk

Adequate ‐ participant and provider blinded.

Incomplete outcome data addressed?
All outcomes

Low risk

Adequate ‐ less than 5%.

Pita Martin 1999

Methods

Randomisation: inadequate ‐ quasi randomised. Allocation concealment: not used. Blinding: inadequate ‐ neither participant nor provider blinded. Outcome assessor blinded. Loss to follow up: inadequate. More than 20% lost to follow up.

Participants

203 healthy pregnant women with normal blood pressure at first visit, attending antenatal care clinic at Diego Paroissien Hospital in the Province of Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Interventions

Women were assigned to one of three groups: group 1 received 60 mg of elemental iron as ferrous fumarate daily; group 2 received 60 mg elemental iron every three days; and group 3 received no treatment. Supplementation started at 8‐28 wks until 34‐37 wks of gestation.

Outcomes

Maternal: Hb, haematocrit, erythroporphyrin, serum ferritin concentration at baseline and at 34‐37wk gestation, premature delivery.
Infant: birthweight.

Notes

Unsupervised.
Women from control group (group 3) were not assigned randomly. These women were recruited but due to delays in the acquisition of the iron tablets and the progression of their pregnancies without supplementation they were left as controls in the study.
This study is used only for comparison between intermittent and daily iron supplementation (group 2 vs group 1).
Compliance not reported.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

High risk

Inadequate ‐ quasi randomised.

Allocation concealment?

High risk

Not used

Blinding?
All outcomes

High risk

Inadequate ‐ neither participant nor provider blinded. Outcome assessor blinded.

Incomplete outcome data addressed?
All outcomes

High risk

Inadequate. More than 20% lost to follow up.

Free of selective reporting?

High risk

Free of other bias?

High risk

Preziosi 1997

Methods

Randomisation: adequate ‐ by random numbers. Allocation concealment: adequate ‐ packages of tablets numbered by manufacturer. Blinding: adequate ‐ participant and provider blinded. Outcome assessor blinded. Loss to follow up: unclear.

Participants

197 healthy pregnant women 17‐40 years of age, with 28 +/‐ 3 wks of gestation attending antenatal care clinic in a Mother‐Child Health Center in Niamey, Niger.

Interventions

Women were randomly assigned to one of two groups: group 1 received 100 mg of elemental iron as ferrous betainate daily; group 2 received placebo.
Supplementation was from 28 +/‐ 3 wks of gestation until delivery.

Outcomes

Maternal: haemoglobin concentration, mean corpuscular volume, haematocrit, erythrocyte protoporphyrin, serum iron, transferrin, total iron binding capacity, serum ferritin concentrations, at baseline and at the first stage of labor and at 3 and 6 months postpartum, prevalence of iron deficiency and iron deficiency anaemia.
Infant: birthweight and length, haemoglobin concentration, mean corpuscular volume, erythrocyte protoporphyrin, serum iron, transferrin saturation, serum ferritin concentrations at birth and at 3 and 6 months; Apgar scores.

Notes

Supervised by physicians who recorded tablet consumption.
Compliance not reported.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Low risk

Adequate ‐ by random numbers.

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

Adequate, packages of tablets numbered by manufacturer.

Blinding?
All outcomes

Low risk

Adequate ‐ participant and provider blinded. Outcome assessor blinded.

Incomplete outcome data addressed?
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Unclear.

Pritchard 1958

Methods

Randomisation: method unclear. Allocation concealment: unclear. Blinding: inadequate. Neither participant nor provider blinded. Outcome assessor not blinded. Loss to follow up: unclear.

Participants

172 pregnant women believed to be in the second trimester of pregnancy by date of last menstrual period attending antenatal care clinic in Parland Memorial Hospital, Dallas, Texas, USA.

Interventions

Women were randomly assigned to one of three interventions: group 1 received 1000 mg of iron intramuscularly as iron‐dextran; group 2 received 112 mg of elemental iron as ferrous gluconate daily in 3 tablets; group 3 received placebo tablets.
Supplementation started during 2nd trimester until delivery.

Outcomes

Maternal: haemoglobin concentration at baseline and at delivery.

Notes

Unsupervised.
Only groups 2 (oral iron) and 3 (placebo) were included in this review.
Compliance not reported.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Unclear risk

Method unclear.

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

Unclear.

Blinding?
All outcomes

High risk

Inadequate. Neither participant no provider blinded. Outcome assessor not blinded.

Incomplete outcome data addressed?
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Unclear.

Free of other bias?

High risk

Puolakka 1980

Methods

Randomisation: method unclear. Allocation concealment: unclear. Blinding: inadequate ‐ open. Loss to follow up: adequate ‐ less than 20% lost to follow up.

Participants

32 healthy non‐anaemic pregnant women attending antenatal care at maternity centres of Oulu University Central Hospital, Finland with uncomplicated pregnancy of less than 16 wks, and no earlier haematological problems.

Interventions

Women were randomly assigned to one of two groups: group 1 received 200 mg of elemental iron as ferrous sulphate daily; group 2 received no treatment.
Supplementation started at 16th week of gestation until one month postpartum.

Outcomes

Maternal: haemoglobin, haematocrit, red cell count, leucocyte count, reticulocytes, mean corpuscular volume, mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration, mean corpuscular haemoglobin, serum iron, total iron binding capacity, transferrin, vitamin B12, whole folate, and serum ferritin concentration at baseline, and at wks, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40 and 5 days, 1, 2, and 6 months postpartum. Bone marrow aspirates at 16th and 32nd week and at 2 months postpartum.
Infant: birthweight, Apgar scores at 5 minutes.

Notes

Unsupervised.
Compliance not reported.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Unclear risk

Method unclear.

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

Unclear.

Blinding?
All outcomes

High risk

Inadequate ‐ open.

Incomplete outcome data addressed?
All outcomes

Low risk

Adequate ‐ less than 20% lost to follow up.

Ridwan 1996

Methods

Randomisation: adequate ‐ block randomised by randomised numbers table. Allocation concealment: not used. Blinding: inadequate ‐ participant and care provider not blinded. Outcome assessor blinded. Loss to follow up: inadequate. More than 20% lost to follow up.

Participants

176 pregnant women with 8‐24 wks of gestation attending antenatal care at six health centres in West Java, Indonesia.

Interventions

Health centres were randomised to one of two interventions: weekly regimen, where women received 120 mg of elemental iron as ferrous sulphate with 0.50 mg of folic acid; or daily regimen where women received 60 mg of elemental iron as ferrous sulphate with 0.25 mg of folic acid daily until week 28‐32 of gestation.
Supplementation started at 8‐24 wks until 28‐32 wks of gestation.

Outcomes

Maternal: haemoglobin concentration, serum ferritin, weight at baseline and at 28‐32 wks of gestation; compliance to treatment and prevalence of parasitic infections.

Notes

Unsupervised but frequent contact with participants.
Randomisation was made by health centres.
Compliance measured by stool tests was 54.3% in the daily group and 62.2% in the weekly group.
Adjustment by intra class correlation coefficient to show effective sample size taking into account cluster randomisation and unit of analysis.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Low risk

Adequate ‐ block randomised by randomised numbers table.

Allocation concealment?

High risk

Not used.

Blinding?
All outcomes

High risk

Inadequate ‐ participant and care provider not blinded. Outcome assessor blinded.

Incomplete outcome data addressed?
All outcomes

High risk

Inadequate. More than 20% lost to follow up.

Robinson 1998

Methods

Randomisation: inadequate ‐ by alternating numbers. Allocation concealment: unclear. Blinding: inadequate ‐ participant and provider not blinded. Outcome assessor blinded. Loss to follow up: inadequate ‐ more than 20% lost to follow up.

Participants

680 pregnant women served by 11 health centres from five sub districts on or near the western end of the island of Seram in the Province of Maluku, Indonesia.

Interventions

Women were assigned to one of two interventions: group 1 received 60 mg of elemental iron as ferrous sulphate with 0.25 mg of folic acid daily by a traditional birth attendant; group 2 received 120 mg of elemental iron as ferrous sulphate with 0.5 mg of folic acid once a week by the traditional home visiting birth attendants. A control group was formed by participants receiving traditional iron supplements (60 mg elemental iron) with folic acid from health centres, self administered without incentive.

Outcomes

Maternal: haemoglobin concentration at baseline and after 12 and 20 wks of supplementation; serum ferritin at baseline and after 12 wks of supplementation; compliance.

Notes

Daily group and control unsupervised. Weekly group supervised.
Each group was further assigned alternatively by registration number to receive 500 mg of mebendazole or a placebo at the second trimester of pregnancy.
Only groups 1 and 2 are used in this analysis. Compliance was 69.6%, 96.2% and 46.9% for groups 1, 2 and control respectively. The study area is endemic to malaria.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

High risk

Inadequate ‐ quasi‐randomised, by alternating numbers.

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

Unclear.

Blinding?
All outcomes

High risk

Inadequate ‐ participant and provider not blinded. Outcome assessor blinded.

Incomplete outcome data addressed?
All outcomes

High risk

Inadequate ‐ more than 20% lost to follow up.

Romslo 1983

Methods

Randomisation: method unclear. Allocation concealment: unclear. Blinding: inadequate ‐ participant blinded. Provider and outcome assessor unclear. Loss to follow up: adequate ‐ less than 20%.

Participants

52 healthy pregnant women attending outpatient Women's clinic at Haukeland Hospital, Bergen, Norway within first 10 wks of a normal singleton pregnancy with uncomplicated delivery at 37‐42 wks.

Interventions

Women were randomly assigned to one of two groups: group 1 received 200 mg of elemental iron as ferrous sulphate daily; group 2 received placebo.
Supplementation started at 10 wks of gestation.

Outcomes

Maternal: haemoglobin, haematocrit, plasma cell volume, erythrocyte count, leucocyte count, mean corpuscular volume, mean corpuscular haemoglobin, mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration, serum iron, iron binding capacity, erythrocyte protoporphyrin, serum ferritin at baseline and every month during 2nd trimester and every 2 wks until delivery.
Infant: birthweight and Apgar scores.

Notes

Unsupervised.
Compliance measured by tablet count was 55% in the iron‐treated group.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Unclear risk

Method unclear.

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

Unclear

Blinding?
All outcomes

High risk

Inadequate ‐ participant blinded. Provider and outcome assessor unclear.

Incomplete outcome data addressed?
All outcomes

Low risk

Adequate ‐ less than 20%.

Siega‐Riz 2001

Methods

Randomisation: adequate ‐ by using random number generator. Allocation concealment: adequate. Blinding: adequate ‐ participant, provider and outcome assessor blinded to treatment. Loss to follow up: inadequate. More than 20% lost to follow up.

Participants

429 non anaemic iron replete women with less than 20 wks of gestation attending who had not taken supplements containing iron in the last month, with a singleton pregnancy attending the prenatal clinic at the Wake County Human services in Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.

Interventions

Women were randomly assigned to one of two groups: group 1 received multivitamin/mineral supplements containing 30 mg of iron as ferrous sulphate daily or group 2 received multivitamin/mineral supplements containing 0 mg of iron (no iron) until 29 wks of gestation. Supplementation started on average at 12 wks. The multivitamin/mineral supplement contained the following: vitamin A 4000 IU; vitamin D 400 IU; vitamin C 70 mg; folic acid 0.5 mg; thiamine 1.5 mg; riboflavin 1.6 mg; niacin 17 mg; vitamin B6 2.6 mg; vitamin B12 2.5 ?g; calcium 200 mg; magnesium 100 mg; copper 1.5 mg; zinc 15 mg. Folic acid supplements were prescribed for all women who had received the positive pregnancy test until the first prenatal visit.

Outcomes

Maternal: prevalence of anaemia, iron repletion andiron deficiency anaemia at 26‐29 wks, side effects, compliance to treatment, iron status (haemoglobin concentration, serum ferritin at 26‐29 wks, preterm delivery.
Infant: birthweight, proportion of low birthweight, small‐for‐gestational age.

Notes

Unsupervised.
Compliance measured by pill counts and a questionnaire and was 66% in the iron group and 63% in the control group. Compliance was also measured by the Medication Event Monitoring System (MEMS) in a sub sample of 100 women.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Low risk

Adequate, by using random number generator.

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

Adequate.

Blinding?
All outcomes

Low risk

Adequate ‐ participant, provider and outcome assessor blinded to treatment.

Incomplete outcome data addressed?
All outcomes

High risk

Inadequate. More than 20% lost to follow up.

Svanberg 1975

Methods

Randomisation: unclear. Allocation concealment: unclear. Blinding: adequate. Participants blind, care provider blind and outcome assessor blinded. Loss to follow up: adequate ‐ less than 20% lost to follow up.

Participants

60 healthy primiparous women attending antenatal care clinic in Goteborg, Sweden with uncomplicated pregnancy and less than 14 wks of gestation and with Hb concentrations above 120 g/L who had not received iron supplements in the previous 6 months or parenteral iron at any previous time. Women whose Hb concentration fell below 100 g/L during the study period were excluded and received immediate therapy.

Interventions

Women were randomly allocated to receive 200 mg of elemental iron as a sustained release preparation of ferrous sulphate daily or placebo from 12 wks of gestation until 9 wks postdelivery.

Outcomes

Maternal: iron absorption measurements; haemoglobin concentration, haematocrit, bone marrow haemosiderin, mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration, total iron binding capacity, transferrin saturation at baseline, and at wks 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, and 35; and 8‐10 wks after delivery.

Notes

Unsupervised.
Compliance measured by remaining pills count was 86 +/‐ 3%.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Unclear risk

Method unclear.

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

Unclear.

Blinding?
All outcomes

Low risk

Adequate. Participants blind, care provider blind and outcome assessor blinded.

Incomplete outcome data addressed?
All outcomes

Low risk

Adequate ‐ less than 20% lost to follow up.

Taylor 1982

Methods

Randomisation: randomised but method unclear. Allocation concealment: unclear. Blinding: inadequate ‐ open. Loss to follow up: adequate ‐ less than 20% lost to follow up.

Participants

48 healthy pregnant women with no adverse medical or obstetric history attending antenatal care clinic in Newcastle, England, United Kingdom before 12 wks of gestation.

Interventions

Women were randomly allocated to one of two groups: group 1 receive 325 mg of ferrous sulphate (about 65 mg elemental iron) and 350 ug of folic acid daily from 12 wks until delivery and group 2 received no supplements.

Outcomes

Maternal: haemoglobin concentration, serum ferritin, mean cell volume at 12 wks and every 4 wks until delivery, and at 6 days, 6 wks and 6 months after delivery; plasma volume at 12 and 36 wks of gestation.
Infant: birthweight, infant death, admission to special care unit.

Notes

Unsupervised.
Compliance not reported.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Unclear risk

Method unclear.

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

Unclear.

Blinding?
All outcomes

High risk

Inadequate ‐ open.

Incomplete outcome data addressed?
All outcomes

Low risk

Adequate ‐ less than 20% lost to follow up.

Tura 1989

Methods

Randomisation: adequate by random number lists. Allocation concealment: adequate, sealed envelopes progressively numerated. Blinding: inadequate ‐ open. Loss to follow up: adequate ‐ less than 20%.

Participants

254 non‐anaemic non‐iron deficient healthy pregnant women from multiple centres in Italy. Exclusion criteria: acquired or congenital anaemia, haemoglobinopathies, thalassaemia, medically or surgically treated cardiopathy, abortion, hypertension, gastric resection, metabolic or endocrine disorder, hepatic or renal disease, epilepsy or another neurological disease, previously treated for cancer, alcohol or substance dependence.

Interventions

Women were randomly assigned to receive 40 mg of elemental iron containing 250 g of ferritin in a microgranulated gastric resistant capsule daily or no treatment from 12‐16 wks of gestation until the end of puerperium.

Outcomes

Maternal: haemoglobin concentration, red cell count, mean corpuscular volume, serum iron, total transferrin, transferrin saturation, serum ferritin at 12‐16 wks, two times during pregnancy, at 38‐42 wks, and at puerperium 48‐52 wks.

Notes

Unsupervised.
The study included another sample of women who were iron deficient and received two forms of iron preparation. This sample is not used in this review.
Compliance reported as higher than 98.5%.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Low risk

Adequate by random number lists

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

Adequate, sealed envelopes progressively numerated.

Blinding?
All outcomes

High risk

Inadequate ‐ open

Incomplete outcome data addressed?
All outcomes

Low risk

Adequate ‐ less than 20% losses to follow up.

Van Eijk 1978

Methods

Randomisation: method unclear. Allocation concealment: not used. Blinding: inadequate ‐ open. Loss to follow up: adequate ‐ less than 20%.

Participants

30 pregnant women with uncomplicated pregnancies and deliveries attending antenatal care clinic at the University Hospital Obstetric Unit in Rotterdam, Netherlands.

Interventions

Women received 100 mg of elemental iron as ferrous sulphate daily or no treatment from the third month of gestation until delivery. Follow up was until 12 wks after delivery.

Outcomes

Maternal: haemoglobin concentration, serum iron, serum ferritin, transferrin concentration at baseline and every 3‐4 wks until delivery, and three months after delivery.
Infant: haemoglobin concentration, transferrin, serum iron, serum ferritin in cord blood at term.

Notes

Unsupervised.
Compliance not reported.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Unclear risk

Method unclear.

Allocation concealment?

High risk

Not used.

Blinding?
All outcomes

High risk

Inadequate ‐ open.

Incomplete outcome data addressed?
All outcomes

Low risk

Adequate ‐ less than 20% losses to follow up.

Wallenburg 1983

Methods

Randomisation: adequate ‐ by random table numbers. Allocation concealment: adequate by means of sealed envelopes. Blinding: inadequate. Participant nor provider blinded. No placebo used. Loss to follow up: adequate ‐ less than 20%.

Participants

44 non‐anaemic Caucasian women with singleton pregnancy and no major illnesses attending the University Hospital Obstetrical Clinic of the Erasmus University in Rotterdam who had not received iron supplementation during their first visit.

Interventions

Women were randomly assigned to one of two groups:
group 1: received 105 mg of elemental iron as ferrous sulphate daily in a sustained release preparation and group 2: received no iron supplement.
Supplementation started at 14‐16th week of gestation until delivery.

Outcomes

Maternal: haemoglobin, serum iron, serum transferrin and serum ferritin concentrations at 16, 28, 36 wks, delivery, 6 and 12 wks postpartum.

Notes

Unsupervised.
Compliance not reported.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Low risk

Adequate ‐ by random table numbers.

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

Adequate, by means of sealed envelopes.

Blinding?
All outcomes

High risk

Inadequate. Participant nor provider blinded. No placebo used.

Incomplete outcome data addressed?
All outcomes

Low risk

Adequate ‐ less than 20% losses to follow up.

Willoughby 1967

Methods

Randomisation: method unclear. Allocation concealment: unclear. Blinding: unclear. Loss to follow up: adequate ‐ less than 20%.

Participants

3599 pregnant women with Hb above 100 g/L at their antenatal care clinic visit at Queen's Mother's Hospital in Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom. Women who reported not taken the tablets regularly ere excluded as well as those diagnosed with anaemia during the study.

Interventions

Women were randomly allocated to one of five interventions: group 1 received no prophylactic supplements; group 2 received 105 mg of elemental iron daily as chelated iron aminoates; group 3 received 105 mg of elemental iron with 100 ug of folic acid; group 4 received 105 mg of elemental iron daily with 300 ug of folic acid; and group 5 received 105 mg elemental iron daily with 450 ug of folic acid.
Starting and ending time of supplementation variable.

Outcomes

Maternal: haemoglobin concentration at baseline and in every visit, at early puerperium and during postnatal visit; incidence of obstetric complications. incidence of megaloblastic anaemia.
Infant: Hb and whole blood folate levels a 6 wks of age. Incidence of neonatal complications.

Notes

Unsupervised.
Groups 3‐5 were merged for the purposes of this review.
Women were excluded from the trial and the analysis if they were diagnosed as anaemic.
Compliance not reported.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Unclear risk

Method unclear.

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

Unclear.

Blinding?
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Unclear.

Incomplete outcome data addressed?
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Adequate ‐ less than 20% losses to follow up. However, women were excluded from the trial and the analysis if they were diagnosed as anaemic.

Free of selective reporting?

High risk

Wills 1947

Methods

Randomisation: inadequate ‐ alternate. Allocation concealment: not used. Blinding: adequate ‐ participant and care provider blinded. Outcome assessor blinded. Loss to follow up: inadequate. More than 20% lost to follow up.

Participants

500 pregnant women attending antenatal care clinic at the Royal Free Hospital in London, England, United Kingdom during wartime, with ages between 18‐43 years. Women with severe anaemic or rheumatoid arthritis were excluded.

Interventions

Women were alternatively allocated to receive 580 mg of elemental iron as ferrous gluconate daily or placebo from their first visit.
Supplementation starting variable and ending time unclear.

Outcomes

Maternal: haemoglobin concentration using the Haldane method at baseline and every 4 wks until delivery, then 1 day, 2‐4 days, 5‐16 days and 6 wks postpartum; serum protein and pregnancy complications (not reported by group).
Infant: birthweight (not reported).

Notes

Unsupervised.
The study was conducted during wartime and a bomb incident interrupted the work allowing only a small portion of original sample studied and reported. Women were receiving special food rations.
Compliance not reported.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

High risk

Inadequate ‐ quasi randomised, alternate.

Allocation concealment?

High risk

Not used.

Blinding?
All outcomes

Low risk

Adequate ‐ participant and care provider blinded. Outcome assessor blinded.

Incomplete outcome data addressed?
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Inadequate. More than 20% lost to follow up.

Winichagoon 2003

Methods

Randomisation: cluster randomisation but method unclear. Allocation concealment: not used. Blinding: inadequate ‐ open. Loss to follow up: inadequate ‐ more than 20% lost to follow up.

Participants

484 apparently healthy pregnant women with 13‐17 wks of gestation who had not received iron supplements before enrolling in the study, and who had a haemoglobin concentration > 80 g/L attending antenatal care clinics at the district hospital and 7 health centres from 54 villages in the Province of Khon‐Kaen in northeast Thailand.

Interventions

The villages were grouped according to size and then randomised in 4 clusters to one of three interventions: group 1 received a daily regimen providing 60 mg of elemental iron as ferrous sulphate with 0.25 mg of folic acid daily; group 2 received 120 mg of elemental iron with 3.5 mg of folic acid once a week; and group 3 received 180 mg of elemental iron as ferrous sulphate with 3.5 mg of folic acid once a week.
Supplementation started at 15 +/‐ 2 wks until delivery.

Outcomes

Maternal: haemoglobin concentration, serum ferritin, free erythrocyte protoporphyrin at baseline and at 35 +/‐ 2 wks of gestation, and 4‐6 months postpartum; haematocrit prior to delivery; weight at baseline and at 35 wks of gestation; compliance, haemoglobin type, and hookworm prevalence.
Infant: birthweight, haemoglobin concentration and serum ferritin at 4‐6 months.

Notes

Unsupervised.
Compliance not reported.
Values adjusted to reflect effective sample size for cluster randomisation.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Unclear risk

Unclear ‐ cluster randomisation but method unclear.

Allocation concealment?

High risk

Not used.

Blinding?
All outcomes

High risk

Inadequate ‐ open.

Incomplete outcome data addressed?
All outcomes

High risk

Inadequate ‐ more than 20% lost to follow up.

Free of other bias?

High risk

Young 2000

Methods

Randomisation: adequate by computer‐generated random number table. Allocation concealment: unclear. Blinding: inadequate ‐ neither participant nor provider blinded. Outcome assessor unclear. Loss to follow up: inadequate. More than 47% lost to follow up.

Participants

413 healthy non‐severely anaemic pregnant women attending antenatal care at Ekwendeni Hospital or its mobile clinics in northern Malawi with less than 30 wks of gestation at their first visit, stratified by initial haemoglobin concentration before randomisation.
Supplementation starting time variable (22.2 +/‐ 4.8 wks) and ending time variable (32.2 +/‐ 4.4 wks of gestation).

Interventions

Women were randomly assigned within each anaemia grade category to one of two interventions: group 1 received 120 mg of elemental iron as ferrous sulphate with 0.5 mg of folic acid once a week; group 2 received 60 mg of elemental iron as ferrous sulphate with 0.25 mg of folic acid daily.

Outcomes

Maternal: haemoglobin concentration at baseline and after 8 wks of supplementation; compliance, presence of side effects, and prevalence of anaemia.

Notes

Unsupervised.
Average gestational age at start was 22.2 +/‐ 4.8 wk and 32.2 +/‐ 4.4 wk at the end of study.
Compliance estimated by self reporting was 76% and 60% in the weekly and daily groups respectively.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Low risk

Adequate by computer‐generated random number table.

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

Unclear.

Blinding?
All outcomes

High risk

Inadequate ‐ neither participant nor provider blinded. Outcome assessor unclear.

Incomplete outcome data addressed?
All outcomes

High risk

Inadequate. More than 47% lost to follow up.

Free of selective reporting?

High risk

Compliance estimated by self reporting was 76% and 60% in the weekly and daily groups respectively.

Free of other bias?

High risk

Yu 1998

Methods

Randomisation: inadequate ‐ quasi randomised. Allocation concealment: inadequate. Blinding: inadequate. Participant and care provider not blinded. Outcome assessor blinded. Loss to follow up: inadequate. More than 54% lost to follow up.

Participants

51 healthy pregnant women with 18‐22 wks of gestation who had not taken supplements or medication in the previous six months attending public health centre in Ulsan, South Korea.

Interventions

Women were randomly assigned to one of two treatments: group 1 received 160 mg of elemental iron in one intake once a week; group 2 received 80 mg of elemental iron daily. Elemental iron was given in the form of ferrous sulphate. Women with low Hb were assigned by the trialists to daily regimen.
Supplementation started at 20.1 wks and 20.2 wks of gestation for groups 1 and 2 respectively.

Outcomes

Maternal: haemoglobin concentration, serum ferritin, red blood cell count, haematocrit, mean corpuscular volume, mean corpuscular haemoglobin, mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration, serum iron, total iron binding capacity, transferrin saturation at baseline and after treatment; zinc status before and after treatment, weight gain, nutrient intake before and after treatment.
Infant: birthweight.

Notes

Unsupervised.
No compliance reported for all the groups. Analysis reported on high compliers only.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

High risk

Inadequate ‐ quasi randomised.

Allocation concealment?

High risk

Inadequate

Blinding?
All outcomes

High risk

Inadequate. Participant and care provider not blinded. Outcome assessor blinded

Incomplete outcome data addressed?
All outcomes

High risk

Inadequate. More than 54% lost to follow up.

Free of selective reporting?

High risk

No compliance reported for all the groups. Analysis reported on high compliers only.

Ziaei 2007

Methods

Randomisation: adequate with table of random numbers. Allocation concealment: adequate. Coded bottles. Blinding: adequate ‐ participants and care provider and outcome assessor blinded. Loss to follow up: adequate. Less than 5% lost to follow up.

Participants

750 apparently healthy non‐smoking non‐anaemic (with Hb higher or equal to 132 g/L) pregnant women in early stage of second trimester, BMI 19.8‐26 kg/m2 and age 17‐35 years with singleton pregnancy attending prenatal care in Tehran, Iran. Women with history of threatened abortion in the present pregnancy or diseases related with polycythaemia such as asthma and chronic hypertension were not included.

Interventions

Women were randomly assigned to one of two groups: group 1 received 50 mg of elemental iron as ferrous sulphate with 1 mg folic acid daily and group 2 received placebo and 1 mg of folic acid daily.

Outcomes

Maternal: haemoglobin at 24‐28 wk, 32‐36 wk, premature delivery, weight gain, C‐sections, hypertensive disorders, severe anaemia, haemoconcentration, iron deficiency, iron deficiency anaemia, mean corpuscular volume, mean corpuscular haemoglobin and Hb concentrations at term, severe anaemia and haemoconcentration at any time during 2‐3 trimesters, symptomatic tract infection, puerperal infection, antepartum and postpartum haemorrhage, transfusion provided, side effects (any), diarrhoea, constipation, nausea, heartburn, vomiting, placental abruption, premature rupture of membranes.

Infant: birthweight, perinatal mortality rate, low Apgar at 10th minute, small for gestational age.

Notes

Unsupervised.
Supplementation started 13.07 ± 2.02 wks gestation for group 1 and 13.66 ± 3.45 wks gestation for the placebo group and lasted until after delivery.
No compliance reported.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Low risk

Adequate with table of random numbers.

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

Adequate. Coded bottles.

Blinding?
All outcomes

Low risk

Adequate ‐ participants and care provider and outcome assessor blinded.

Incomplete outcome data addressed?
All outcomes

Low risk

Adequate. Less than 5% lost to follow up.

Ziaei 2008

Methods

Randomisation: adequate with table of random numbers. Allocation concealment: adequate. Coded bottles. Blinding: adequate ‐ participants and care provider blinded. Loss to follow up: adequate. Less than 5% lost to follow up.

Participants

244 pregnant women 17‐35 years of age attending prenatal care in Tehran, Iran, with BMI between 19.8‐26 kg/m2, and 13‐18 wks of gestation, with singleton pregnancy and non‐anaemic (Hb 132 g/L or higher) and normal serum ferritin (15 ug/L or higher). Women who smoked, had history of diseases such as polycythaemia, asthma, or chronic hypertension, or a history or threatened abortion in the present pregnancy were excluded.

Interventions

Women were randomly assigned to one of two groups: group 1 received 50 mg of elemental iron as ferrous sulphate daily and group 2 received placebo from 20th week of gestation until delivery. All women received 50 mg elemental iron as ferrous sulphate after delivery for 6 wks.

Outcomes

Maternal: haemoglobin, haematocrit, serum ferritin at baseline, at time of delivery, one week post‐partum and six wks post‐partum, postpartum haemorrhage, C‐sections.

Notes

Unsupervised.
No compliance reported.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Low risk

Adequate with table of random numbers.

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

Adequate. Coded bottles.

Blinding?
All outcomes

Low risk

Adequate ‐ participants and care provider blinded.

Incomplete outcome data addressed?
All outcomes

Low risk

Adequate. Less than 5% lost to follow up.

Fe: iron
Hb: haemoglobin
ITT: intention to treat
MCV: mean corpuscular volume
PCV: plasma cell volume
SES: socioeconomic status
vs: versus
wk(s): week(s)

Characteristics of excluded studies [ordered by study ID]

Study

Reason for exclusion

Aaseth 2001

67 non‐anaemic pregnant women attending prenatal care clinics in Kingsvinger Hospital, in Kingsvinger, Norway were allocated to a daily regimen of either 100 mg Fe or 15 mg Fe. Both groups received iron at different doses. No comparisons allowed within the scope of this review.

Abel 2000

Community based study in Vellore district, India using a pre‐post experimental design measuring the impact of an iron supplementation program, helminthic treatment and education intervention in the prevalence of anaemia in the different trimesters of pregnancy. The same pregnant women were not followed.

Afifi 1978

260 pregnant women from Cairo, United Arab Republic were randomly allocated to two forms of iron: a slow release ferrous sulphate preparation and ferrous sulphate in addition to folic acid. Both groups received iron supplementation in different preparations. No comparisons allowed within the scope of this review.

Ahn 2006

209 pregnant women between 18 and 45 years of age, attending outpatient obstetric clinics at North York General Hospital and the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto, Canada were randomly assigned to receive multiple micronutrient supplements containing 60 mg of iron as ferrous fumarate (Materna) or another supplement (PregVit) to be taken twice daily with the morning dose containing 35 mg of iron and the evening dose containing 300 mg calcium, among other vitamins and minerals. Both groups received iron in different doses as well as other vitamins and minerals. No comparisons allowed within the scope of this review.

Angeles‐Agdeppa 2003

744 apparently healthy pregnant (with less than 20 wks) and non‐pregnant women of reproductive age (15‐49 years) from the municipalities of Calasiao, Binmaley and Santa Barbara, Philippines who were pregnant or most likely to become pregnant within the 12‐month duration of the study, and who volunteered to participate in the study were provided two preparations of iron‐folic acid supplements. Women with severe anaemia or history of malaria were excluded. Non‐pregnant women were prescribed four capsules monthly each containing 60 mg of elemental iron and 3.5 mg folic acid to be taken once weekly before bedtime (to be purchased by the women in local drugstores). Pregnant women received free of cost four capsules monthly each containing 120 mg of elemental iron and 3.5 mg of folic acid to be taken once a week before bedtime until delivery and for 3 months thereafter. Pregnant women seen at the health centres with 20 wks or more of gestation were advised to take their usual daily dose of iron‐folic acid tablets containing 60 mg of elemental iron and 0.5 mg of folic acid. Women were followed for 12 months. Haemoglobin, haematocrit, mean corpuscular volume, mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration, serum ferritin, transferrin receptors, prevalence of iron deficiency and anaemia, compliance were assessed at baseline, 4.5, 9 and 12 months. There was not randomisation and the control group was not appropriate for comparisons.

Babior 1985

Fifteen healthy pregnant women 22‐32 years old, in the first trimester of pregnancy from Boston, Massachusetts, USA were randomly assigned to three different multiple micronutrient preparations to assess absorption of iron.

Bencaiova 2007

260 women with singleton pregnancy in Zurich, Germany, were randomised at 21‐24 wks of gestation to receive either intravenous iron group (further divided into two doses of 200 mg iron saccharate or three doses of 200 mg iron) or 80 mg elemental iron as ferrous sulphate daily. Both groups received iron in different routes of administration. No comparisons allowed within the scope of this review.

Berger 2003

864 apparently healthy married pregnant and non‐pregnant nulliparous women of reproductive age planning to have a child soon from 19 rural communes of the Thanh Mien district in Hai Duong province, Vietnam were invited to participate and assigned to one of the following interventions according to their pregnancy status at baseline: women who were pregnant received free of charge UNICEF tablets containing 60 mg of elemental iron and 0.25 mg of folic acid to be taken daily and women who were non‐pregnant were prescribed pink packs of tablets containing 60 mg of elemental iron and 3.5 mg of folic acid that they could buy at their village from the Women's Union, to be taken once weekly. If these women became pregnant, women received red packs of tablets containing 120 mg of elemental iron and 3.5 mg of folic acid free of charge to be taken once weekly. After delivery women were given tablets containing 60 mg of iron and 0.5 mg of folic acid free of charge for 3 months to be taken weekly. Haemoglobin concentration, serum ferritin, and serum ferritin receptors, prevalence of anaemia and iron deficiency and compliance were measured at baseline, at 4.5, 9 and 12 months. This is not a randomised study and no comparisons can be made for the aims of this review.

Bergsjo 1987

Planned study registered at the Oxford Database of Perinatal Trials. Author contacted and informed the project was not completed.

Blot 1980

203 pregnant women attending prenatal care clinics during their 6th month visit were randomly allocated to either 105 mg of elemental iron with 500 mg of ascorbic acid or a placebo. Both groups received iron.

Brown 1972

109 pregnant women attending prenatal care clinics in Manchester, England were randomly allocated to one of three groups: group A: one tablet daily given in 'reminder packs', group B: one tablet daily given in loose forms, or group C two tablets daily given in loose form. Tablets contained 50 mg of elemental iron as slow release ferrous sulphate and 400 ug of folic acid. All groups received iron. No comparisons allowed within the scope of this review.

Burslem 1968

472 pregnant women attending the booking clinic were alternatively allocated to two forms of iron: a slow release ferrous sulphate preparation and folic acid or combined conventional ferrous sulphate/folic acid. Both groups received iron supplementation in different preparations. No comparisons allowed within the scope of this review.

Buss 1981

18 pregnant women were randomly assigned to receive either a tablet containing 80 mg of elemental iron with a new mucous membrane vaccine (Tardyferon® or a tablet containing 80 mg elemental iron with 0.35 mg folic acid (Tardyferon‐Fol®) for a period of 3 months. All women received iron. No comparisons allowed within the scope of this review.

Carrasco 1962

Two liquid preparations were used in this study: one with D‐sorbitol and the other without. Both preparations contained vitamin B12, vitamin B6, ferric pyrophosphate and folic acid.

Casanueva 2003a

120 singleton pregnant women attending the Instituto Nacional de Perinatologia in Mexico City, Mexico with haemoglobin concentrations higher than 115 g/L at 20 wks of gestation (equivalent to 105 g/L at sea level) were randomly assigned to one of two groups, group 1: one tablet containing 60 mg of elemental iron, 200 ug folic acid and 1 ug vitamin B12 given daily, and group 2: two tablets (total 120 mg of elemental iron, 400 ug folic acid, and 2 ug vitamin B12) to be taken once weekly. Haemoglobin and serum ferritin concentrations were measured every 4 wks from wks 20 until 36, side effects, compliance, birth weight, gestational age at birth, anaemia, iron deficiency. The addition of vitamin B12 to the formulation makes this study ineligible to the inclusion criteria. No comparisons allowed within the scope of this review.

Chanarin 1965

190 pregnant women attending antenatal clinic in St Mary's Hospital in London, England were randomly assigned to one of three groups: ferrous fumarate, ferrous fumarate and folic acid, or placebo. The outcomes measured include full blood count at 20th, 30th, 35th and 39th week of gestation and 6th day after delivery. The paper does not report standard deviations in the variables measured and no data can be extracted.

Chawla 1995

81 pregnant women with 20 +/‐ wks of gestation from Ludhiana City, India were divided to one of three groups: group 1, 60 mg of elemental iron ad 500 ug of folic acid daily; group 2, 60 mg of elemental iron and 2,000,000 IU of vitamin A, or group 3, who did not receive any supplements. Supplementation was for a period of 15 wks. Outcomes measured included haemoglobin, red blood cell count, total iron binding capacity, transferrin saturation, serum iron, serum vitamin A at baseline and at 36 +/‐ 2 wks of gestation. Poor methodological quality. None of the outcomes pre‐specified in our protocol were recorded due to the varied time of final measurements.

Coelho 2000

100 pregnant women with 20‐34 wks of gestation attending the antenatal clinic at The Bandra Holy Family Hospital, Bandra, Mumbai India were randomly assigned to receive 30 mg elemental iron + other essential micronutrients daily or 116 mg elemental iron, folic acid, zinc and vitamin C daily. Outcomes included haemoglobin concentration, maternal weight gain, infant birth weight and maternal compliance and side effects Both groups received iron supplementation. No comparisons allowed within the scope of this review.

Cook 1990

200 women were randomly assigned to receive 50 mg iron daily given either as Gastric Delivery System (GDS) or conventional ferrous sulphate. Gastrointestinal side effects were evaluated. The participants were non‐pregnant women.

Dawson 1987

42 healthy women with less than 16 wks of pregnancy were randomly assigned to receive either a multiple micronutrient supplement containing 65 mg of elemental iron or one multiple micronutrient supplement with no iron, calcium, zinc and copper and pantothenic acid. Both groups received different multivitamin/multi mineral supplement formulations. No comparisons allowed within the scope of this review.

Dijkhuizen 2004

170 pregnant women with less than 20 wk gestation from 13 adjacent villages in a rural area in Bogor District, West Java, Indonesia were randomly assigned to receive daily supplementation with B‐carotene (4.5 mg), zinc (30 mg), both, or placebo containing iron (30 mg) and folic acid (0.4 mg). Both groups received iron and folic acid. No comparisons allowed within the scope of this review.

Dommisse 1983

146 pregnant women with less than 20 wks of gestation were randomly allocated to receive either a multivitamin tablet twice a day or a multivitamin tablet in conjunction with a standard ferrous sulphate tablet twice a day providing a total of 120 mg of elemental iron daily. Both groups received a multivitamin supplement. No data can be extracted from the published article.

Edgar 1956

179 pregnant women with Hb levels below 105 g/L and more than 16 wks of gestation volunteered for this study and were divided into four supplementation groups according to the stage of pregnancy: 16th week, 20th week, 24th week, and non‐supplemented controls. 37% of these women were lost to follow up and were excluded from the final analysis. Data are presented without standard deviation. No data can be extracted from the publication for this review.

Ekstrom 1996

176 pregnant women attending Ilula Lutheran Health Center's antenatal service in Iringa region, Tanzania with 21‐26 wks of gestational age and haemoglobin > 80 g/L were randomly assigned to receive 120 mg elemental iron as ferrous sulphate in conventional form or 50 mg elemental iron as gastric delivery system (GDS). Both groups received iron supplementation in different preparations. No comparisons allowed within the scope of this review.

Fenton 1977

154 pregnant women with less than 14 wks of gestation, and who had not received or were receiving treatment for a blood disorder were divided into 2 groups according to the day in which they attended the clinic in Cardiff: group 1 received 60 mg of ferrous sulphate and group 2 received placebo. Haemoglobin concentration, mean corpuscular volume (MCV), serum ferritin, serum iron and total iron binding capacity were measured at 10‐14 wk and at term. The data in the paper are presented with no standard deviation values. No data can be extracted from the publication for this review.

Fleming 1974

146 consecutive pregnant women attending a public antenatal clinic in Western Australia before the 20th week of gestation who had not received iron supplements and were willing to participate were randomly assigned in sequences of 50 to one of the 5 interventions groups: group 1 received placebo; group 2 received 60 mg of elemental iron as ferrous sulphate; group 3 received 0.5 mg of folic acid; group 4 received 60 mg of elemental iron as ferrous sulphate and 0.5 mg of folic acid; and group 5 received 60 mg of elemental iron as ferrous sulphate and 5 mg of folic acid. Supplementation with iron was from 20th week of gestation until delivery. All women had received 50 mg of ascorbic acid daily from the first visit until week 20th. More than 20% of the women were lost to follow up. No data can be extracted from the publication for this review.

Fleming 1986

200 apparently healthy primigravidae Hausa women living in Zaria, Nigeria and planning to deliver in Zaria, with less than 24 wks of gestation, who had not taken any antimalarial treatment or iron supplements in current pregnancy were randomly assigned to one of five groups: group 1: received no active treatment; group 2: received chloroquine 600 mg base once, followed by proguanil 100 mg per day; group 3 received in addition to chloroquine and proguanil, 60 mg elemental iron daily; group 4 received in addition to chloroquine and proguanil, 1 mg of folic acid daily, and group 5: in addition to chloroquine and proguanil received 60 mg of elemental iron and 1 mg of folic acid daily. Eighty‐nine out of 200 women delivered in the hospital and no other complete clear data can be extracted for the outcomes of interest in this review.

Fletcher 1971

643 pregnant women attending antenatal clinic in London were randomly assigned to one of two groups: group 1 received 200 mg of ferrous sulphate daily; group 2 received 200 mg of ferrous sulphate with 5 mg of folic acid daily. Both groups received iron. No comparisons allowed within the scope of this review.

Foulkes 1982

568 apparently healthy pregnant women with less than 20 wks of pregnancy and no prior iron supplementation were allocated alternatively to receive 100 mg of elemental iron and 350 ug of folic acid daily or no treatment. Ferritin and haemoglobin concentrations were measured at baseline and at 28 and 36 wks of gestation and 2 days postpartum. Mean corpuscular volume and mean corpuscular haemoglobin were measured at 2 days postpartum. Only means and median are presented. No standard deviation is shown and for ferritin concentrations no ln‐transformed data are presented. No data were extractable from the paper and subsequent communication with author.

Freire 1989

412 non‐black pregnant women with 26 ± 2 wks of gestation, who had not received iron supplements in the previous 6 months, from low SES using the prenatal unit of Quito's public obstetric hospital, Ecuador were randomly assigned to receive two tablets containing 78 mg of elemental iron as ferrous sulphate daily or placebo during a period of 2 months. Overall loss to follow up rate was 41.7%. Haemoglobin, PCV, red cell indices, serum ferritin, total iron binding capacity, serum folate, serum vitamin B12 at baseline and after 2 months. Prevalence of iron deficiency was estimated by response to therapy. No prespecified outcomes from this review are presented in the paper. No further data were available.

Gomber 2002

40 apparently healthy women with singleton pregnancy in their second trimester (between 16‐24 wks of gestation), living in urban slums, from low socio‐economic status attending Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, Delhi, India were randomly assigned to receive one tablet containing 100 mg of elemental iron as ferrous sulphate with 500 ug of folic acid daily or once a week. Weekly intake was supervised. Duration of supplementation was 100 days. Haemoglobin and haematocrit concentrations at baseline, at 4 wks, 8 wks and 14 wks of supplementation, serum ferritin concentration, at baseline, at 14 wks of supplementation and at delivery.
No prespecified outcomes in this review are reported. Serum ferritin values is reported as log transformed values but no standard deviations are presented.

Goonewardene 2001

92 pregnant women from 14‐24 wks of gestation attending the university antenatal clinic, in Galle, Sri Lanka were randomly assigned to one of three regimens: group 1 (n = 26) received a tablet containing 100 mg of elemental iron as ferrous fumarate, with additional micronutrients once a week; group 2 (n = 35) received the same tablet but three times a week; and group 3 (n = 31) received the same supplement in a daily fashion. All groups were receiving multiple micronutrients. No comparisons allowed within the scope of this review.

Gopalan 2004

900 pregnant women of poor socio‐economic status females attending government antenatal care clinics were grouped in three groups: group 1 (n = 300) received routine antenatal care; group 2 (n = 300) received 100 mg of elemental iron and 500 ug folic acid daily from the 20th week of gestation and group 3 (n = 300) received 100 mg of elemental iron and 500 ug folic acid daily from the 20th week of gestation and additionally 900 mg of alpha linolenic acid from the 22nd week of gestation. Outcomes assessed included birth weight, low birth weigh, premature delivery. The study is not reported as randomised and is excluded in the first screening for eligibility.  

Gringras 1982

40 pregnant women attending antenatal care clinic were given a tablet containing 47 mg of elemental iron, as ferrous sulphate and 0.5 mg of folic acid daily or a tablet containing 100 mg of elemental iron as ferrous glycine sulphate daily. Both groups received iron. No comparisons allowed within the scope of this review.

Groner 1986

40 pregnant women attending antenatal care at the Adolescent Pregnancy Clinic and Obstetrics Clinics at the John Hopkins and Sinai Hospital in Baltimore, Maryland, USA at or before 16 wks of pregnancy with haematocrit equal or above 31% were randomly assigned to one of two groups: group 1 (n = 16) received 60 mg of elemental iron as ferrous fumarate and prenatal vitamins daily; or group 2 (n = 9) received only the prenatal vitamins with no iron. Two women objected to the randomisation and 13 dropped out of the study. Both groups received multiple micronutrients. Supplementation lasted a month. Psychometric tests (arithmetic, total digit span, digit symbol, vocabulary and others) were performed and hematologic status was measured at baseline and after a month. Hematologic outcomes cannot be extracted from the paper. None of the other outcomes were sought.

Guldholt 1991

192 pregnant women were consecutively randomised to receive one of two treatments: group 1: received a daily vitamin‐mineral tablet containing 15 mg of elemental iron or group 2: received a daily vitamin‐mineral tablet containing 100 mg of elemental iron. Both groups received iron in different doses. No comparisons allowed within the scope of this review.

Hampel 1974

65 untreated and 54 treated pregnant women in West Berlin, Germany were assessed during pregnancy for haemoglobin concentrations, iron an folate levels, total iron binding capacity, and red cell count. No data are presented for outcomes prespecified in the review. Women were of different gestational age. No outcomes can be extracted from the paper.

Hawkins 1987

No report available of the study results.

Hermsdorf 1986

120 unselected pregnant women were given 114 mg of elemental iron daily from week 15 until delivery, or not treatment. Only an abstract with insufficient data available.

Hoa 2005

202 apparently healthy pregnant women 20‐32 years of age attending health clinics from 12 communes in Dong HungDistrict, Thai Binh Province, Vietnam with 14‐18 wks of gestation who agreed to participate in the study were selected to participate. Women were assigned through block randomly assigned to one of 4 interventions: group 1 (n = 44) received 400 ml fortified milk with iron (ferrous fumarate), vitamin C and folic acid daily; group 2 (n = 41) received 400 ml of milk fortified with vitamin C and folic acid but no iron daily; group 3 (n = 40) received one tablet containing 60 mg of elemental iron (as ferrous sulphate) and 250 ug of folic acid daily and group 4 (n = 43) received one placebo tablet daily. For purposes of this review groups 3 and 4 comparing iron and folic acid supplements to placebo could be included. However, no data on outcomes of interest could be extracted from the published report.

Horgan 1966

42 apparently healthy pregnant women attending two antenatal care clinics in London, England were assigned to one of three interventions: group 1 received 200 mg ferrous sulphate with 5 mg of folic acid three times a day; group 2 received 350 mg of ferrous aminoate with 50 ug of folic acid three times a day; and group 3 received 200 mg of ferrous sulphate with 500 ug of folic acid once a day. Intervention period was 3 wks. All groups received iron and folic acid. No comparisons allowed within the scope of this review.

Hosokawa 1989

84 anaemic women seeking antenatal care in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of the Fukui School of Medicine Hospital, Japan were randomly assigned to receive 100 mg of elemental iron as ferrous sulphate daily after the evening meal, or the same dose + vitamin C for 4 wks. Both groups received iron. No comparisons allowed within the scope of this review.

Iyengar 1970

800 pregnant women with less than 24 wks of gestation and Hb > 85 g/L in India were assigned by rotation to one of four groups: group 1 received placebo tablets; group 2 received 30 mg of elemental iron as ferrous fumarate in a single tablet daily; group 3 received 30 mg of elemental iron as ferrous fumarate with 500 ug of folic acid in a single tablet; and group 4 received in addition to iron and folic acid, 2 ug of vitamin B12 in a single tablet. Loss to follow up was 65%. None of the pre‐specified outcomes in the protocol was reported and no data were extractable from the paper.

Kaestel 2005

2100 pregnant women (22 +/‐ 7 wk gestation at entry) attending antenatal clinics in Bissau, Guinea‐Bissau or who were identified by The Bandim Health project were randomly assigned to receive daily multi micronutrient tablet containing one Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) of 15 micronutrients, or daily multi micronutrients containing two times the RDA except for iron that was maintained at one RDA or a conventional prenatal daily iron (60 mg) and folic acid (400 ug) supplement. All groups receive iron and folic acid daily. No comparisons allowed within the scope of this review.

Kann 1988

36 healthy non‐anaemic pregnant women in second or third trimesters of gestation were randomly assigned to receive one of four prenatal commercial multivitamin/multi mineral preparations daily: Stuartnatal 1+1; Stuart Prenatal; Materna; and Natalins Rx. All participants received multiple micronutrients. No comparisons allowed within the scope of this review.

Kumar 2005

220 pregnant women with a singleton pregnancy and Hb between 80‐110 g/L at 16‐24 wk gestation from New Delhi, India were randomly allocated to receive daily oral iron therapy of 100 mg elemental iron as ferrous sulphate with 500 ug folic acid or 250 mg of iron sorbitol intramuscularly and repeated at an interval of 4‐6 wks. This trial compares the effects of daily oral iron with two injections of high dose parenteral iron. No comparisons allowed within the scope of this review.

Madan 1999

109 apparently healthy pregnant women with 16‐24 wks of gestation who had not received iron supplements were randomly assigned to one of three groups: group 1 received 60 mg of elemental iron + 0.5 mg of folic acid once daily; group 2 received 120 mg of elemental iron + 0.5 mg of folic acid once daily; group 3 received 120 mg of elemental iron twice daily + 0.5 mg of folic acid. Duration of supplementation was 12‐14 wks. All participants received iron and folic acid daily. No comparisons are allowed within the scope of this review.

Mbaye 2006

1035 pregnant women attending mother and child health clinics near the town of Farafenni, The Gambia were randomised to receive either folic acid (500‐1500 ug/day) together with oral iron (47 mg of ferrous sulphate per tablet) or oral iron alone (60 mg of ferrous sulphate per tablet) daily for 14 days. All women received treatment with three tablets of SP (25 mg of pyrimethamine and 500 mg of sulfadoxine). Both groups received iron daily. No comparisons allowed within the scope of this review.

McKenna 2002

102 healthy pregnant women attending antenatal clinics at the Royal Jubilee Maternity Hospital in Belfast, Ireland with a singleton pregnancy and haemoglobin > 104 g/L and known gestational age of less than 20 wks who were non‐compliers with routine prescription of 200 mg of ferrous sulphate daily, were randomly assigned to receive 2 sachets of 24 ml each of Spatone® water containing 10 mg of elemental iron or placebo. Participants were instructed to take the two sachets daily half an hour before breakfast diluting it in orange juice. Primary outcomes were compliance and side effects. Duration of intervention was from week 22 to week 28 of gestation.

Menon 1962

273 healthy pregnant women with 16‐24 wks of gestation and haemoglobin concentrations at or above 105 g/L attending antenatal care clinics were divided in order in which they were registered in three groups: group 1 was given 5 g of ferrous sulphate daily; group 2 received 5 mg of folic acid daily; and group 3 received 5 g of ferrous sulphate and 5 mg of folic acid daily. All participants were given 3 multivitamin tablets daily containing vitamin A, vitamin B, C and D. The study was not randomised.

Milman 2005

427 healthy Danish pregnant women living in the northeastern part of Copenhagen County, Denmark were randomly allocated to receive iron (as ferrous fumarate) in daily doses of 20 mg (n = 105), 40 mg (n = 108), 60 mg (n = 106), and 80 mg (n = 108) from 18 wks of gestation. Hemoglobin (Hb), serum ferritin, and serum soluble transferrin receptor concentrations were measured at 18 wks (inclusion), 32 wks, and 39 wks of gestation and 8 wks postpartum. All women received iron daily. No comparisons allowed within the scope of this review.

Morgan 1961

356 pregnant women attending two different antenatal care clinics at the King Edward Memorial Hospital for Women in Subiaco, Australia received according to the clinic they visited, either no treatment or 100 mg of elemental iron as ferrous gluconate daily. No systematic allocation was used in this open trial.

Morrison 1977

105 pregnant women attending the University Unit, Mater Misericordiae Mothers' Hospital, South Brisbane, Australia, with normal height, weight and nutrition for the Australian population and with no previous adverse medical, surgical or obstetrical history were allotted by random selection to one of four types of supplements: group 1 received 50 mg of elemental iron as dried ferrous sulphate daily; group 2 received 80 mg elemental iron as dried ferrous sulphate with 300 ug of folic acid daily; group 3 received 105 mg elemental iron as ferrous sulphate and group 4 received 105 mg of elemental iron as ferrous sulphate with 300 ug of folic acid. All groups received iron daily. No comparisons allowed within the scope of this review.

Mumtaz 2000

191 anaemic pregnant women between the ages of 17‐35 years of age, and uneventful obstetric history attending the Maternity wing of the Federal Government Services Hospital in Islamabad and the Maternal & Child Health Clinic at the Christian Mission Hospital in Taxila, Pakistan were randomly assigned to one of two interventions: group 1 received 200 mg of ferrous sulphate (40 mg elemental iron) with 1 mg of folic acid once daily; and group 2 received 200 mg of ferrous sulphate with 1 mg of folic acid on two days of the week and placebo the rest of the days. Subjects and care providers were blinded to the treatments. Outcomes measured included haemoglobin concentration and serum ferritin at baseline and during the three following consecutive visits as well as compliance and weight. Change in haemoglobin Z‐scores after supplementation was the main outcome variable, in women from different gestational ages and duration of intervention, thus not allowing outcomes prespecified in this review.

Nguyen 2008

167 pregnant women with less than 20 wks of gestation who called either Motherisk General Information line or the Motherisk Nausea and Vomiting of Pregnancy (NVP) Helpline (Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto) and had not started taking or had discontinued any multivitamin due to adverse events were randomly assigned to one of two groups: group 1 were provided, PregVit®  (a small‐size, containing 35 mg elemental iron as ferrous fumarate and multivitamins; or group 2 who received Orifer F®  (high iron content, small size) containing 60 mg elemental iron as ferrous sulphate and multivitamins. Follow‐up interviews documented pill intake and adverse events. Participants from both groups received iron in different amounts and compounds.

Nogueira 2002

74 low‐income pregnant adolescents ranging from 13‐18 years of age attending antenatal care at the Evangelina Rosa Maternity Hospital in Teresina, Piaui State, Brazil were distributed into five groups: group 1 received 120 mg elemental iron as ferrous sulphate and 250 ug of folic acid daily; group 2 received 80 mg elemental iron as ferrous sulphate and 250 ug folic acid daily; group 3 received 120 mg of elemental iron, with 5 mg of zinc sulphate and 250 ug of folic acid daily; and group 4 received 80 mg of elemental iron as ferrous sulphate, with 5 mg of zinc sulphate and 250 ug of folic acid daily. All groups received iron and two groups received zinc in addition to iron and folic acid. No comparisons allowed within the scope of this review.

Ogunbode 1984

80 apparently healthy non‐anaemic pregnant women attending University College Hospital and Inalende Maternity Hospital in Ibadan, Nigeria during the first and second trimesters of pregnancy were randomly allocated to one of two groups: group 1 (n = 39) received one tablet Ferrograd Folic 500 Plus® daily, a sustained‐released formulation containing ferrous sulphate and folic acid (composition is not available); or group 2 (n = 41) received a capsule containing 200 mg ferrous sulphate and 5 mg of folic acid. All patients were also provided 25 mg weekly of pyrimethamine throughout pregnancy as an anti‐malarial agent. Patients who became anaemic during pregnancy were excluded of the study and analysis. Outcomes measured included reticulocyte count, haematocrit, anaemia, side effects. Both groups received iron and folic acid supplements, thus making the comparisons not suitable for this review.

Ogunbode 1992

315 apparently healthy pregnant women attending four prenatal care clinics in 4 geographical areas of Nigeria with mild to moderate anaemia (as defined by haematocrit between 26%‐34%) and 18‐28 wks of gestation, single pregnancies, no complications and who consented to participate in the study were randomly allocated to one of two groups: group 1 (n = 159) received one daily capsule of a multiple micronutrient supplement Chemiron® containing 300 mg of ferrous fumarate, 5 mg folic acid, 10 ug vitamin B12, 25 mg of vitamin C, 0.3 mg magnesium sulphate and 0.3 mg of zinc sulphate; group 2 (n = 156) received a capsule containing 200 mg ferrous sulphate and 5 mg of folic acid. All patients were also provided 600 mg of cloroquine to be taken under supervision and 25 mg weekly of pyrimethamine throughout pregnancy. Patients who became anaemic during pregnancy were excluded of the study and analysis. Outcomes measured included blood haemoglobin, anaemia, haematocrit, serum ferritin levels, side effects. A second published study followed these same women and their infants. Both groups received iron and folic acid supplements, thus making the comparisons not suitable for this review.

Ortega‐Soler 1998

41 healthy pregnant women, attending prenatal care clinics at Hospital Diego Paroissien in La Matanza, Province of Buenos Aires, Argentina with serum ferritin below 50 mg/mL. Women were assigned to one of two groups: group 1 received 100 mg of elemental iron daily as ferric maltosate, and group 2 received no treatment.
Supplementation started at 21 +/‐ 7 wks of gestation until birth. Maternal outcomes measured included: haemoglobin, erythrocyte protoporphyrin, serum ferritin at baseline and term, dietary intake. The iron intake was unsupervised and compliance was not reported. The trial is not randomised nor quasi randomised so it does not fill the inclusion criteria for this review.

Osrin 2005

1200 healthy pregnant women with a singleton pregnancy and less than 20 wk gestation attending an antenatal clinic at Janakpur zonal hospital in Nepal, were randomly assigned to receive routine daily iron (60 mg) and folic acid (400 ug) supplements or a multiple micronutrient supplement containing 15 vitamins and minerals including iron (30 mg) and folic acid (400 ug). Both groups received iron and folic acid. No comparisons allowed within the scope of this review.

Payne 1968

200 pregnant women attending antenatal clinics in Glasgow, Scotland with less than 20 wk gestation, whose antenatal care was undertaken wholly by the hospital antenatal clinic and who subsequently had a normal delivery, were randomly allocated to receive 200 mg of ferrous sulphate daily or 200 mg of ferrous sulphate with 1.7 mg of folic acid daily throughout pregnancy. Both groups received iron. No comparisons allowed within the scope of this review.

Pena‐Rosas 2003

116 pregnant women of 10‐30 wk of gestational age attended antenatal care clinics in Trujillo, Venezuela were randomly allocated to receive a 120 mg oral dose of iron as ferrous sulphate and 0.5 mg of folic acid weekly (n = 52) or 60 mg iron and 0.25 mg folic acid and a placebo twice weekly (n = 44). Haemoglobin, hematocrit, serum ferritin and transferrin saturation were estimated at baseline and at 36‐39 wk of gestation. All groups received iron and folic acid in two intermittent regimens with no control group. No comparisons allowed within the scope of this review.

Picha 1975

In a randomised double‐blind study the new effervescent iron tablet Loesferron® was tested in 57 postpartum women. The participants were not pregnant women.

Quintero 2004

107 healthy pregnant women with 6‐20 wks of gestation who had not received iron supplements during the current pregnancy attending 19 health units in the State of Morelos, Mexico were randomly assigned by block pairs to receive either 120 mg of elemental iron as ferrous sulphate in a single dose daily or once weekly. Haemoglobin concentration, prevalence of anaemia and nutrient consumption at baseline and after 10 wks of supplementation were measured. None of the prespecified outcomes of this review were available. Gestational ages were variable among the participants.

Ramakrishnan 2003

873 pregnant women living near Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico with less than 13 wks of gestation who did not use micronutrient supplements were randomly assigned to receive a daily multiple micronutrient supplement or a daily iron‐only supplement. Both supplements contained 60 mg of elemental iron as ferrous sulphate. Supplement intake was supervised by trained workers from registration until delivery by home visits 6 days a week. No comparison allowed within the scope of this review.

Rayado 1997

394 healthy non‐anaemic adult pregnant women with 24‐32 wks of gestation and singleton pregnancy from Fuentalabra, Spain were randomly assigned to one of two groups: group 1 received 40 mg of elemental iron as iron mannitol albumin daily; and group 2 received 40 mg elemental iron as iron protein succinylate daily. Both groups received iron daily. No comparisons allowed within the scope of this review.

Reddaiah 1989

110 pregnant women attending the antenatal clinic at Comprehensive Rura Health Services Project Hospital, Ballabgarh, India, with 16‐24 wks of gestation were randomly assigned to one of three groups: group 1 received 60 mg elemental iron and 0.5 mg of folic acid daily; group 2 received 120 mg elemental iron with 0.5 mg of folic acid daily; and group 3 received 240 mg elemental iron and 0.5 mg of folic acid daily. Elemental iron was given as ferrous sulphate. All groups received iron daily. No comparisons allowed within the scope of this review.

Roztocil 1994

84 non‐anaemic pregnant women at Mazarik University Brno in Czech Republic were treated from 20‐24 wks with one capsule of Actiferrin Compositum®, and from 36 wks to delivery with 2 capsules. The group was compared with 57 non‐anaemic pregnant women who received no supplements. The supplement contained 34.5 mg of elemental iron as ferrous sulphate, 0.5 mg of folic acid, and 0.3 mg of cyanocobalamin. No comparisons allowed within the scope of this review.

Rybo 1971

117 pregnant women between 20‐29 wks of gestation were alternatively assigned during three consecutive two wks periods to receive daily tablets containing 200 mg of elemental iron as ferrous sulphate, 200 mg of elemental iron as a sustained released iron or placebo. After each 2‐wks treatment period women were questioned about possible side effects. No side effects are reported by group assigned. No comparisons are allowed within the scope of this review.

Sandstad 2003

233 pregnant women attending their second antenatal care visit at the University Health Services of Oslo, Norway with serum ferritin concentration < 60 ug/L were randomised to two different iron preparations, group 1 received one tablet containing 60 mg of elemental iron as ferrous sulphate daily; group 2 received three tablets each containing 1.2 mg of heme iron from porcine blood plus 8 mg of elemental iron as ferrous fumarate per tablet (total 3.6 heme iron and 24 mg elemental iron) daily. A third group (n = 93) of pregnant women who had been given advice to take or not the iron supplements according to the centre recommendations were enrolled in the trial at 6 wks postpartum and served as control. The study groups were not randomised to the interventions and no comparisons can be made within the scope of this review.

Seck 2008

221 apparently healthy pregnant women, had not used iron supplements prior to enrolment, who were 12 to 16 wks were recruited from six health centres in Dakar, Senegal during their first prenatal visit, and randomly assigned to receive either a prescription to purchase iron/folic acid tablets to be taken daily, according to official policy, or to receive free tablets. Compliance was assessed 20 wks after enrolment through interviews and pill count. All women received iron. No comparisons allowed within the scope of this review.

Shatrugna 1999

115 healthy pregnant women with 20‐28 wks of gestation attending the antenatal clinic of the National Institute of Nutrition, Government Maternity Hospital, India were randomly assigned to one of 11 different formulations and doses of iron and then undergo iron tolerance tests. They received ferrous sulphate tablets containing 60 mg, 12 mg, and 180 mg of elemental iron; formulations containing 60 mg of elemental iron as pure ferrous sulphate salt, ferrous fumarate tablets, ferrous fumarate syrup, excipients added to pure ferrous sulphate salts; powdered ferrous sulphate tablets, iron tablets distributed by the National Nutritional Anaemia Prophylaxis Programme and pure ferrous salt in gelatin capsules.

Simmons 1993

376 pregnant women with ages between 16‐35 y, with mild anaemia (Hb concentrations between 80‐110 g/L) attending eight maternal and child health centres in Kingston, St. Andrews and Spanish Town, Jamaica, with gestational age between 14‐22 wks were randomly assigned to one of three groups: group 1 received one placebo tablet daily; group 2 received 100 mg of elemental iron as ferrous sulphate daily; group 3 received gastric delivery system capsule containing 50 mg of elemental iron daily. All women received 400 mg of folic acid. Outcomes measure included haemoglobin, haematocrit, MCV, white cell count, serum iron, total iron binding capacity, serum ferritin, serum transferrin receptor, at baseline, at 6 wks and at 12 wks after start of supplementation as well as side effects. No prespecified outcomes are presented at the paper as gestational ages differed in the participants.

Sjostedt 1977

300 pregnant women attending the Maternity Welfare Center, in Oulu, Finland before the 5th month of pregnancy were randomly assigned to one of three interventions: group 1 received 100 mg of elemental iron daily as sustained‐release tablets daily; group 2 received 200 mg of elemental iron daily as sustained‐release tablets and group 3 received 200 mg of elemental iron daily as rapidly disintegrating ferrous sulphate tablets. All groups received iron in different doses and formulations.

Sood 1979

151 healthy pregnant women with Hb > 50 g/L who had not received iron supplements during the last 6 months from Delhi and Vellore, India were divided in one of three strata according to Hb concentration (50‐79 g/L; 80‐109 g/L;110 g/L and above) and within each strata were allocated randomly to one of five interventions: group 1 received 120 mg of elemental iron as ferrous sulphate 6 days a week; group 2 received 100 mg of elemental iron as iron dextran complex intramuscular twice per week; group 3 received iron as group 1 + pteroylmonoglutamic acid 5 mg/d 6 days a week + cyanocobalamin 100 ug intramuscular once per 14 d; group 4 received 100 mg of elemental iron intramuscular + pteroylmonoglutamic acid + cyanocobalamin 100 ug intramuscular; and group 5 received iron dextran complex intramuscular in a single total dose infusion + 5 mg/d pteroylmonoglutamic acid + 100 ug intramuscular cyanocobalamin once per 14 days. All groups received iron at different doses and routes. No comparisons allowed within the scope of this review.

Steer 1992

Trial abandoned. No data available.

Stone 1975

248 healthy pregnant women attending hospital antenatal clinic in London, England, were allocated randomly to receive a slow‐release dose of 105 mg of elemental iron as ferrous sulphate and 350 ug of folic acid daily or 80 mg of elemental iron as ferrous fumarate and 400 ug of folic acid daily in a standard preparation. Both groups received iron in different doses and preparations. No comparisons allowed within the scope of this review.

Suharno 1993

251 pregnant women aged 17‐35 years, parity 0‐4 and haemoglobin concentrations between 80 and 109 g/L were randomly allocated to one of four groups: group 1 received 2.4 mg of retinol and one placebo iron tablet daily; group 2 received 60 mg of elemental iron as ferrous sulphate and a placebo vitamin A tablet daily; group 3 received 2.4 mg of retinol and 60 mg of elemental iron; and group 4 received two placebos for 8 wks. Outcomes measured include: haemoglobin, haematocrit, serum ferritin, serum iron, total iron binding capacity, serum retinol, transferrin saturation, at baseline and after 8 wks of supplementation. None of the pre‐specified outcomes in this review can be extracted from this paper.

Tampakoudis 1996

82 pregnant women with haemoglobin concentrations 140 g/L or above attending clinic in Thessaloniki, Greece were randomised to receive 80 mg iron protein succinylate daily or a placebo. Serial haemoglobin, haematocrit and serum erythropoietin were measured from maternal blood and cord blood on delivery; serum ferritin measured in frequent intervals. Abstract only available. Insufficient information to assess characteristics of the trial.

Tan 1995

285 healthy middle‐class pregnant women with haemoglobin concentration above 100 g/L attending antenatal clinic at the University Hospital at Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia were assigned to receive daily iron supplements or no treatment. Abstract only available. No additional information was available, including doses, regimens and other characteristics of the trial.

Tange 1993

128 anaemic and non‐anaemic pregnant females aged 10‐19 years old, with an average gestation of 16 wks, were grouped for three levels of iron supplementation: group 1 (n = 42 non‐anaemic participants) received placebo (no iron); group 2 (n = 41 anaemic and non‐anaemic participants) received 22 mg of elemental iron daily and group 3 (n = 45 anaemic and non‐anaemic participants) received 55 mg elemental iron daily. Women were supplemented from 16 wks until delivery. Outcomes assessed included Hb, haematocrit, red cell count, mean corpuscular volume, serum iron, serum transferring and serum, ferritin measured every four wks. The study is not reported as randomised and is excluded in the first screening for eligibility.  

Thane‐Toe 1982

135 healthy pregnant women between 22‐28 wks of gestation attending antenatal clinic in Burma, were randomly assigned to receive a daily dose of 60 mg, 120 mg or 240 mg of elemental iron as ferrous sulphate. A control group was composed by 47 apparently healthy adults (17 males and 30 single women). Control groups are not appropriate. No comparisons allowed within the scope of this review.

Tholin 1993

83 healthy nulliparous non vegetarian, non‐anaemic pregnant women with serum ferritin concentrations above 10 ug/L were randomly assigned to one of three groups: group 1 received 100 mg of elemental iron as ferrous sulphate daily; group 2 received placebo, and group 3 received dietary advice only. Blood haemoglobin, serum ferritin and blood manganese were determined at baseline before 15th week of gestation, between 25‐28 wks, and between 35‐40 wks of gestation. Median and ranges are presented. No outcomes were extractable from this report for this review.

Thomsen 1993

52 healthy non‐anaemic nulliparous women with normal singleton pregnancy and serum ferritin levels above 15 mg/L at 16th week in Herlev, Denmark were randomly assigned to receive either a daily tablet containing 18 mg or a daily tablet containing 100 mg of elemental iron from 16 wks until delivery. All women received 0.3 mg of folic acid daily. All women received iron in different doses. No comparisons allowed within the scope of this review.

Vogel 1963

191 consecutive pregnant when attending antenatal care clinics and at 32 wks of gestation were divided in two groups by alternate allocation by clinic: group 1 received 140 mg of elemental iron daily as ferrous gluconate in four tablets; group 2 received 150 mg elemental iron daily as ferrous glutamate in 3 tablets. All women received iron in different dose and number of tablets. No comparisons allowed within the scope of this review.

Wali 2002

60 iron deficiency anaemic pregnant women with the gestational age of 12‐34 wks were randomly assigned to one of 3 groups: Group A (n = 15) received intravenous 500 mg of iron sucrose for storage; group B (n = 20) received intravenous iron sucrose according to deficit calculated as per formula with 200 mg of iron was given for storage and group C received intra muscular iron Sorbitol in the dose used as practice. All groups received iron intravenous or intramuscular.

Willoughby 1966

350 consecutive pregnant women attending antenatal care clinic were allocated to one of five groups: group 1 received no hematinic supplements; group 2 received 105 mg of elemental iron daily as iron chelate aminoates; group 3 received 105 mg of elemental iron daily with 100 ug of folic acid; group 4 received 105 mg of elemental iron daily with 300 ug of folic acid; and group 5 received 105 mg of elemental iron daily th 450 ug of folic acid. All women received a multivitamin preparation (Vivatel) free of folic acid.

Willoughby 1968

68 pregnant women attending antenatal care clinic in Queen Mother's Hospital in Scotland, were randomly allocated to receive 195 mg of elemental iron alone daily or 195 mg of elemental iron in conjunction with 300 ug of folic acid daily.

Wu 1998

369 pregnant women attending antenatal care at Beijing Hospital, China were divided into two groups according to their initial haemoglobin concentrations. Women with Hb 110 g/L or above were randomly assigned to one of two groups: group 1 (n = 96) received one daily tablet of maternal supplement containing 60 mg of elemental iron in addition to other micronutrients including calcium and magnesium ; group 2 (n = 95) served as control and received no supplements. Another group of women with Hb < 110 g/L (treatment group) were randomly assigned to one of three groups: group 1 received 1 tablet of maternal supplement daily; group 2 received 0.9 g of ferrous sulphate daily; and group 3 received one tablet of Ferroids, a sustained released preparation daily. In the preventive group, women entered the study from 20‐24 gestational wks. In the treatment groups, women less than 36 gestational wks were accepted. No comparisons allowed due to the addition of other micronutrients in the treatment.

Zhou 2007

180 anaemic women (Hb < 110 g/L) attending antenatal care at the Children, Youth and Women's Health Service, Adelaide, Australia with 24‐32 wks of gestation and a singleton pregnancy. Women were excluded if they were taking iron or vitamin and mineral supplements, had presumptive diagnosis of non iron deficiency related anaemia, history of thalassaemia, drug or alcohol abuse and/or diabetes requiring insulin or a known fetal abnormality. Women were randomly assigned to receive a daily dose of 20, 40 or 80 mg of elemental iron as ferrous sulphate for 8 wks or until birth. The primary outcomes measured were Hb levels, anaemia at the end of the intervention and gastrointestinal side effects during treatment. All women received iron at different doses. No comparisons allowed within the scope of this review.

Zittoun 1983

203 pregnant women attending antenatal clinic in Paris, France, with 28 +/‐ 2 wks of gestation were studied. Women with Hb below 110 g/L (n = 48) were provided 105 mg of elemental iron and 500 mg of ascorbic acid daily. Women with Hb concentration above 110 g/L were randomly assigned to receive 105 mg of elemental iron and 500 mg of ascorbic acid daily until delivery or placebo. Iron was provided in conjunction with vitamin C. No comparisons allowed within the scope of this review.

Zutshi 2004

200 apparently pregnant women with 24‐26 wks of gestation, with singleton pregnancy with moderate anaemia (Hb > 80 g/L and < 110 g/L) were randomly assigned to receive injectable iron‐sorbitol‐citrate in three intramuscular doses of 150 mg each at 4 wks intervals or 100 mg of elemental iron daily. Haemoglobin concentrations were measured at baseline, every 4 wks and at delivery. The study compares two routes of iron administration. Both groups receive iron. No comparisons allowed within the scope of this review.

IU: international units
Hb: Haemoglobin

wk(s): week(s)

Characteristics of studies awaiting assessment [ordered by study ID]

Bhatla 2009

Methods

Randomisation: adequate. Computer‐generated random numbers. Allocation concealment: inadequate ‐ not used. Blinding: inadequate. Open to participants, care providers and outcome assessor. Loss to follow up: adequate. Less than 20% were lost to follow up.

Participants

109 pregnant non‐anaemic women between 14 and 18 wks with no prior intake of iron supplements in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of the All India Institute of Medical Sciences in New Delhi, India were invited to participate in the study. Exclusion criteria were: haemoglobin < 110 g/L, packed cell volume (PCV) < 30; cigarette smoking; preexisting hypertension or diabetes; history of chronic illness, e.g. liver or renal disease, tuberculosis, heart disease, malaria; history of bleeding disorders, bleeding piles, chronic peptic ulcer; thalassaemia or other haemoglobinopathies; intake of drugs such as antiepileptics, non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), antithyroid medication, vitamins, antioxidants; multiple pregnancy; and prior history of blood transfusion.

Interventions

Participants were randomly allocated into one of three different groups: group 1 (n = 37) received the standard Government of India supply of Irofol®  tablets containing 100 mg of elemental iron as ferrous sulphate and 500 ug folic acid (Nestor Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Faridabad, Haryana, India) to be taken once weekly; group 2 (n = 36) received the standard Government of India supply of Irofol® tablets containing 100 mg of elemental iron as ferrous sulphate and 500 ug folic acid and were instructed to take two tablets on any one day of the week ? one before lunch and the other before dinner (total 200 mg elemental iron and 1000 ug folic acid a week) with no tablets were taken during the rest of the week; group 3 (n = 36) received Ferium® tablets iron (III)‐hydroxide polymaltose complex tablets daily containing Iron (III) Hydroxide Polymaltose containing 100 mg elemental iron and 350 ug folic acid  to be taken one tablet daily (Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Pune). All groups received health education regarding the importance of diet in pregnancy, iron‐rich foods and appropriate dietary practices and were instructed to take the tablets 30 min before meals and not with tea, coffee or milk. They were also advised to take calcium supplements after meals.

Outcomes

Maternal: miscarriage, intrauterine demise, haemoglobin, haematocrit, MCV and MCHC, thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) and glutathione levels at baseline (14‐16 wks) and at 30‐34 wks, compliance, side effects, nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, constipation, metallic taste, epigastric discomfort, premature delivery, hypertension during pregnancy, pre­eclampsia, C‐section.

Infant: birth weight, low birth weight (LBW), placental weight, 1 min Apgar score and incidence of meconium.

Notes

Mean gestation at which supplementation was started was 16.1 1.3 wks and mean duration of iron supplementation before final sampling was 17.9 1.4 wks

Zeng 2008

Methods

Randomisation: (A) adequate. Cluster randomised. Allocation concealment: (A) adequate. A treatment colour code was assigned to each village based on the treatment allocation schedule and opened only once all data had been collected and blinded analysis completed. Blinding: (A) adequate. Participant and care provider blinded. Loss to follow up: (A) adequate. Less than 20% loss to follow up.

Participants

5828 eligible pregnant women with less than 28 wks and residents in two poor rural counties in Shaanxi Province of north west China participated in the study. Their villages were randomly assigned for women to receive one of three groups.

Interventions

Their villages were randomly assigned for women to receive one of three groups: group 1, daily antenatal multiple micronutrients containing 30 mg iron, 400 µg folic acid and 15 mg zinc, 2 mg copper, 65 µg selenium, 150 µg iodine, 800 µg vitamin A, 1.4 mg vitamin B‐1 (thiamine), 1.4 mg vitamin B‐2 (riboflavin), 1.9 mg vitamin B‐6, 2.6 µg vitamin B‐12, 5 µg vitamin D, 70 mg vitamin C, 10 mg vitamin E, and 18 mg niacin; group 2 who received a tablet containing 60 mg iron and 400 ug of folic acid; and group 3 received a tablet containing 400 ug of folic acid alone (control).

Outcomes

Birth weight within one hour of delivery, low birth weight, birth length, gestational age at birth, preterm delivery, small for gestational age babies, maternal haemoglobin concentration in the third trimester (gestation 28‐32 wks), anaemia in the third trimester, fetal losses during pregnancy, birth outcome, delivery information, neonatal and maternal deaths; neonatal survival at the six wks, perinatal deaths, neonatal deaths, stillbirths.

Notes

Characteristics of ongoing studies [ordered by study ID]

Cogswell 2006

Trial name or title

Impact of iron/folic acid versus multimicronutrient versus folic acid supplements during pregnancy on mortality, morbidity, and complications during pregnancy, labor, and delivery: a randomised controlled trial in China.

Methods

Participants

Pregnant women 20 years or older who live in one of the study counties (Laoting, Mancheng, Fengrun, Xianghe, Yuanshi), who can follow instructions and can swallow pills.

Interventions

Daily prenatal supplements that contain 400 ug folic acid alone, or daily supplements that contain 30 mg iron and 400 ug folic acid.
Daily supplements that contain 30 mg iron and 400 ug folic acid or daily supplement containing 30 mg iron, 400ug folic acid and other vitamins and minerals (UNICEF formulation).

Outcomes

Perinatal mortality, i.e., the number of stillbirths (fetal deaths of 28 wks or more of gestation) and the number of deaths within the first 0‐6 days of life per 1000 births (live births and stillbirths); Gastrointestinal side effects at monthly visits.

Starting date

May 2006; expected completion: December 2010.

Contact information

Mary E Cogswell, DrPH, RN 770‐488‐6053 [email protected]
Mei Zuguo, MD, MPH 770‐488‐5864 [email protected]

Notes

Hemminki 2008

Trial name or title

Routine Iron Prophylaxis During Pregnancy (PROFEG)

Methods

A pragmatic randomised controlled trial with non‐blind design. Total intended sample size is 4000 women. Hypothesis: group 2 will have better health outcomes. Study site: Mozambique, Maputo City.

Participants

Pregnant women 18 years of age or older attending prenatal care in two health centres, one in Maputo city and one in Maputo province. The women are followed in prenatal visits and until delivery.

Interventions

Women will be randomised individually and allocated into two different groups: group 1, women in the routine iron prophylaxis will receive 65 mg ferrous sulphate and 400 ug of folic acid daily; group 2, women will be screened in the antenatal visits with measurements of Hb. If Hb is lower than 90 g/L women will receive a monthly supply of 130 mg of iron to be taken daily and folic acid. If Hb is 90 g/L or higher then women receive 1 tablet containing 1 mg of folic acid.

Outcomes

Primary outcomes: preterm delivery, low birth weight, malaria reactivation during pregnancy (mother) [Time Frame: Until birth]. Secondary Outcome Measures: perinatal mortality, complications during pregnancy and birth [Time Frame: pregnancy and neonatal period].

Starting date

The project consists of three interlinked phases: the preparatory phase, pilot study and trial as such. The research project started in April 2005 with the preparatory phase, the pilot study of the second phase tested the data collection methods and procedures in the study protocol. The third phase is currently ongoing.

Contact information

Principal Investigator:Elina Hemminki;

Study Director: Baltazar Chilundo

Elina Hemminki, Research Professor
THL (National Institute for Health and Welfare)
P.O.Box 30, 00271 Helsinki, Finland
E‐mail: [email protected]
Phone: +358‐20‐6107307
fax  +358‐20 6107227
http://groups.stakes.fi/thp/en       

Baltazar Chilundo, MD, PhD

Universidade Eduardo Mondlande,

Faculty of Medicine, Department of Community Health  

Phone: +258 84 3158350    

E‐mail: [email protected]

Notes

Data and analyses

Open in table viewer
Comparison 1. Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Low birthweight (less than 2500 g) (ALL) Show forest plot

9

6275

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.79 [0.61, 1.03]

Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 1 Low birthweight (less than 2500 g) (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 1 Low birthweight (less than 2500 g) (ALL).

2 Low birthweight (less than 2500 g) (BY SUBGROUPS) Show forest plot

9

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 2 Low birthweight (less than 2500 g) (BY SUBGROUPS).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 2 Low birthweight (less than 2500 g) (BY SUBGROUPS).

2.1 Early gestational age (less than 20 weeks of gestation or pre‐pregnancy) at start of supplementation

7

5771

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.81 [0.61, 1.08]

2.2 Late gestational age (20 weeks or more of gestation) at start of supplementation

2

504

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.55 [0.22, 1.38]

2.5 Non‐anaemic at start of supplementation

6

4452

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.76 [0.46, 1.25]

2.6 Unspecified/mixed anaemic status at start of supplementation

3

1823

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.82 [0.71, 0.94]

2.7 Daily lower dose (60 mg elemental iron or less)

7

3247

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.79 [0.53, 1.18]

2.8 Daily higher dose (more than 60 mg elemental iron)

2

3028

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.75 [0.45, 1.26]

3 Birthweight (g) (ALL) Show forest plot

10

5956

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

36.05 [‐4.84, 76.95]

Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 3 Birthweight (g) (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 3 Birthweight (g) (ALL).

4 Birthweight (g) (BY SUBGROUPS) Show forest plot

11

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 4 Birthweight (g) (BY SUBGROUPS).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 4 Birthweight (g) (BY SUBGROUPS).

4.1 Early gestational age (less than 20 weeks of gestation or pre‐pregnancy) at start of supplementation

9

5822

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

30.89 [‐13.87, 75.65]

4.2 Late gestational age (20 weeks or more of gestation) at start of supplementation

2

251

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

39.72 [‐67.69, 147.12]

4.5 Non‐anaemic at start of supplementation

8

4496

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

29.32 [‐27.08, 85.71]

4.6 Unspecified/mixed anaemic status at start of supplementation

3

1577

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

52.33 [10.16, 94.51]

4.7 Daily low dose (60 mg elemental iron or less)

6

2804

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

37.22 [‐17.82, 92.27]

4.8 Daily higher dose (more than 60 mg elemental iron)

6

3382

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

17.99 [‐41.28, 77.26]

5 Premature delivery (less than 37 weeks of gestation) (ALL) Show forest plot

8

5730

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.85 [0.67, 1.09]

Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 5 Premature delivery (less than 37 weeks of gestation) (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 5 Premature delivery (less than 37 weeks of gestation) (ALL).

6 Premature delivery (less 37 weeks of gestation) (BY SUBGROUPS) Show forest plot

8

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 6 Premature delivery (less 37 weeks of gestation) (BY SUBGROUPS).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 6 Premature delivery (less 37 weeks of gestation) (BY SUBGROUPS).

6.1 Early gestational age (less than 20 weeks of gestation or pre‐pregnancy) at start of supplementation

6

2989

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.89 [0.66, 1.20]

6.2 Late gestational age (20 weeks or more of gestation) at start of supplementation

1

47

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.32 [0.01, 7.48]

6.5 Non‐anaemic at start of supplementation

6

1775

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.78 [0.54, 1.12]

6.6 Unspecified/mixed anaemic status at start of supplementation

1

1261

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.04 [0.85, 1.28]

6.7 Daily lower dose (60 mg elemental iron or less)

6

3023

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.89 [0.68, 1.18]

6.8 Daily higher dose (more than 60 mg elemental iron)

2

2707

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.71 [0.48, 1.06]

7 Maternal Hb concentration at term (g/L) (ALL) Show forest plot

17

2463

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

8.83 [6.55, 11.11]

Analysis 1.7

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 7 Maternal Hb concentration at term (g/L) (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 7 Maternal Hb concentration at term (g/L) (ALL).

8 Maternal Hb concentration at term (g/L) (BY SUBGROUPS) Show forest plot

17

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 1.8

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 8 Maternal Hb concentration at term (g/L) (BY SUBGROUPS).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 8 Maternal Hb concentration at term (g/L) (BY SUBGROUPS).

8.1 Early gestational age (less than 20 weeks of gestation or pre‐pregnancy) at start of supplementation

13

2306

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

8.14 [5.61, 10.67]

8.2 Late gestational age (20 weeks or more of gestation) at start of supplementation

3

130

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

10.24 [2.45, 18.04]

8.3 Unspecified/mixed gestational age at start of supplementation

1

27

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

14.0 [8.07, 19.93]

8.5 Non‐anaemic at start of supplementation

11

2002

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

7.77 [4.86, 10.69]

8.6 Unspecified/mixed anaemic status at start of supplementation

6

461

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

11.03 [7.51, 14.56]

8.7 Daily low dose (60 mg elemental iron or less)

8

1956

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

7.16 [4.14, 10.17]

8.8 Daily higher dose (more than 60 mg elemental iron)

9

507

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

10.94 [7.06, 14.82]

9 Anaemia at term (Hb less than 110 g/L) (ALL) Show forest plot

14

4390

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.27 [0.17, 0.42]

Analysis 1.9

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 9 Anaemia at term (Hb less than 110 g/L) (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 9 Anaemia at term (Hb less than 110 g/L) (ALL).

10 Haemoconcentration at term (Hb more than 130 g/L) (ALL) Show forest plot

10

4643

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.62 [1.21, 5.67]

Analysis 1.10

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 10 Haemoconcentration at term (Hb more than 130 g/L) (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 10 Haemoconcentration at term (Hb more than 130 g/L) (ALL).

11 Haemoconcentration at term (Hb more than 130 g/L) (BY SUBGROUPS) Show forest plot

10

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 1.11

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 11 Haemoconcentration at term (Hb more than 130 g/L) (BY SUBGROUPS).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 11 Haemoconcentration at term (Hb more than 130 g/L) (BY SUBGROUPS).

11.1 Early gestational age (less than 20 weeks of gestation or pre‐pregnancy) at start of supplementation

5

4173

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.99 [0.72, 5.45]

11.2 Late gestational age (20 weeks or more of gestation) at start of supplementation

3

198

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

3.94 [0.31, 50.47]

11.3 Unspecified/mixed gestational age at start of supplementation

2

272

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

4.67 [2.53, 8.60]

11.5 Non‐anaemic at start of supplementation

5

4011

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.73 [0.64, 4.66]

11.6 Unspecified/mixed anaemic status at start of supplementation

5

632

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

4.03 [1.39, 11.72]

11.7 Daily low dose (60 mg elemental iron or less)

4

1317

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.44 [0.54, 3.86]

11.8 Daily higher dose (more than 60 mg elemental iron)

6

3326

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

3.55 [1.89, 6.66]

12 Haemoconcentration during second or third trimester (ALL) Show forest plot

10

4841

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.27 [1.40, 3.70]

Analysis 1.12

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 12 Haemoconcentration during second or third trimester (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 12 Haemoconcentration during second or third trimester (ALL).

13 Haemoconcentration during second or third trimester (BY SUBGROUPS) Show forest plot

10

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 1.13

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 13 Haemoconcentration during second or third trimester (BY SUBGROUPS).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 13 Haemoconcentration during second or third trimester (BY SUBGROUPS).

13.1 Early gestational age (less than 20 weeks of gestation or pre‐pregnancy) at start of supplementation

7

4522

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.62 [1.49, 4.60]

13.2 Late gestational age (20 weeks or more of gestation) at start of supplementation

1

47

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.44 [0.72, 2.86]

13.3 Unspecified/mixed gestational age at start of supplementation

2

272

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.94 [0.30, 12.29]

13.5 Non‐anaemic at start of supplementation

6

4088

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.10 [1.13, 3.90]

13.6 Unspecified/mixed anaemic status at start of supplementation

4

753

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.67 [0.99, 7.17]

13.7 Daily low dose (60 mg elemental iron or less)

5

1655

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.35 [1.21, 4.57]

13.8 Daily higher dose (more than 60 mg elemental iron)

5

3186

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.14 [1.05, 4.37]

14 Iron deficiency at term (as defined by two or more indicators) (ALL) Show forest plot

6

1108

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.44 [0.27, 0.70]

Analysis 1.14

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 14 Iron deficiency at term (as defined by two or more indicators) (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 14 Iron deficiency at term (as defined by two or more indicators) (ALL).

15 Iron deficiency at term (as defined by two or more indicators) (BY SUBGROUPS) Show forest plot

6

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 1.15

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 15 Iron deficiency at term (as defined by two or more indicators) (BY SUBGROUPS).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 15 Iron deficiency at term (as defined by two or more indicators) (BY SUBGROUPS).

15.1 Early gestational age (less than 20 weeks of gestation or pre‐pregnancy) at start of supplementation

4

867

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.56 [0.35, 0.90]

15.2 Late gestational age (20 weeks or more of gestation) at start of supplementation

2

241

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.28 [0.17, 0.44]

15.5 Non‐anaemic at start of supplementation

4

944

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.60 [0.41, 0.90]

15.6 Unspecified/mixed anaemic status at start of supplementation

2

164

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.14 [0.07, 0.29]

15.7 Daily low dose (60 mg elemental iron or less)

4

944

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.60 [0.41, 0.90]

15.8 Daily higher dose (more than 60 mg elemental iron)

2

164

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.14 [0.07, 0.29]

16 Iron deficiency anaemia at term (ALL) Show forest plot

6

1667

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.33 [0.16, 0.69]

Analysis 1.16

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 16 Iron deficiency anaemia at term (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 16 Iron deficiency anaemia at term (ALL).

17 Iron deficiency anaemia at term (BY SUBGROUPS) Show forest plot

6

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 1.17

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 17 Iron deficiency anaemia at term (BY SUBGROUPS).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 17 Iron deficiency anaemia at term (BY SUBGROUPS).

17.1 Early gestational age (less than 20 weeks of gestation or pre‐pregnancy) at start of supplementation

5

1622

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.37 [0.18, 0.76]

17.2 Late gestational age (20 weeks or more of gestation) at start of supplementation

1

45

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.07 [0.00, 1.13]

17.5 Non‐anaemic at start of supplementation

5

1547

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.39 [0.20, 0.74]

17.6 Unspecified/mixed anaemic status at start of supplementation

1

120

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.04 [0.00, 0.72]

17.7 Daily low dose (60 mg elemental iron or less)

5

1547

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.39 [0.20, 0.74]

17.8 Daily higher dose (more than 60 mg elemental iron)

1

120

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.04 [0.00, 0.72]

18 Side‐effects (Any) (ALL) Show forest plot

8

3667

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

3.92 [1.21, 12.64]

Analysis 1.18

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 18 Side‐effects (Any) (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 18 Side‐effects (Any) (ALL).

19 Side‐effects (Any) (BY SUBGROUPS) Show forest plot

8

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 1.19

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 19 Side‐effects (Any) (BY SUBGROUPS).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 19 Side‐effects (Any) (BY SUBGROUPS).

19.1 Early gestational age (less than 20 weeks of gestation or pre‐pregnancy) at start of supplementation

4

3034

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

3.69 [0.42, 32.71]

19.2 Late gestational age (20 weeks or more of gestation) at start of supplementation

3

428

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.75 [0.99, 3.08]

19.3 Unspecified/mixed gestational age at start of supplementation

1

205

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

62.79 [3.89, 1013.31]

19.5 Non‐anaemic at start of supplementation

4

2897

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

3.27 [0.39, 27.31]

19.6 Unspecified/mixed anaemic status at start of supplementation

4

770

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

3.94 [1.09, 14.28]

19.7 Daily low dose (60 mg elemental iron or less)

4

566

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.36 [0.99, 1.87]

19.8 Daily higher dose (more than 60 mg elemental iron)

5

3148

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

12.12 [1.76, 83.43]

20 Very low birthweight (less than 1500 g) (ALL) Show forest plot

5

2687

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.73 [0.31, 1.74]

Analysis 1.20

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 20 Very low birthweight (less than 1500 g) (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 20 Very low birthweight (less than 1500 g) (ALL).

21 Perinatal death (ALL) Show forest plot

3

5036

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.93 [0.67, 1.29]

Analysis 1.21

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 21 Perinatal death (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 21 Perinatal death (ALL).

24 Infant Hb concentration at 3 months (g/L) (ALL) Show forest plot

1

197

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [‐3.21, 3.21]

Analysis 1.24

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 24 Infant Hb concentration at 3 months (g/L) (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 24 Infant Hb concentration at 3 months (g/L) (ALL).

25 Infant serum ferritin concentration at 3 months (ug/L) (ALL) Show forest plot

1

197

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

19.0 [2.75, 35.25]

Analysis 1.25

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 25 Infant serum ferritin concentration at 3 months (ug/L) (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 25 Infant serum ferritin concentration at 3 months (ug/L) (ALL).

26 Infant Hb concentration at 6 months (g/L) (ALL) Show forest plot

2

533

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.25 [‐8.10, 5.59]

Analysis 1.26

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 26 Infant Hb concentration at 6 months (g/L) (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 26 Infant Hb concentration at 6 months (g/L) (ALL).

27 Infant serum ferritin concentration at 6 months (ug/L) (ALL) Show forest plot

1

197

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

11.0 [4.37, 17.63]

Analysis 1.27

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 27 Infant serum ferritin concentration at 6 months (ug/L) (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 27 Infant serum ferritin concentration at 6 months (ug/L) (ALL).

29 Admission to special care unit (ALL) Show forest plot

2

2805

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.95 [0.73, 1.23]

Analysis 1.29

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 29 Admission to special care unit (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 29 Admission to special care unit (ALL).

30 Very premature delivery (less than 34 weeks' gestation) (ALL) Show forest plot

4

1417

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.44 [0.16, 1.24]

Analysis 1.30

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 30 Very premature delivery (less than 34 weeks' gestation) (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 30 Very premature delivery (less than 34 weeks' gestation) (ALL).

31 Severe anaemia at term (Hb less than 70 g/L) (ALL) Show forest plot

8

1751

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

4.83 [0.23, 99.88]

Analysis 1.31

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 31 Severe anaemia at term (Hb less than 70 g/L) (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 31 Severe anaemia at term (Hb less than 70 g/L) (ALL).

32 Moderate anaemia at term (Hb more than 70 g/L and less than 90 g/L) (ALL) Show forest plot

9

1868

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.94 [0.55, 1.62]

Analysis 1.32

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 32 Moderate anaemia at term (Hb more than 70 g/L and less than 90 g/L) (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 32 Moderate anaemia at term (Hb more than 70 g/L and less than 90 g/L) (ALL).

33 Severe anaemia at any time during second and third trimester (ALL) Show forest plot

9

2089

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.48 [0.01, 34.52]

Analysis 1.33

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 33 Severe anaemia at any time during second and third trimester (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 33 Severe anaemia at any time during second and third trimester (ALL).

34 Moderate anaemia at any time during second or third trimester (ALL) Show forest plot

10

2266

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.42 [0.19, 0.92]

Analysis 1.34

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 34 Moderate anaemia at any time during second or third trimester (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 34 Moderate anaemia at any time during second or third trimester (ALL).

35 Infection during pregnancy (including urinary tract infections) (ALL) Show forest plot

2

3421

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.16 [0.83, 1.63]

Analysis 1.35

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 35 Infection during pregnancy (including urinary tract infections) (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 35 Infection during pregnancy (including urinary tract infections) (ALL).

36 Puerperal infection (ALL) Show forest plot

2

2169

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.72 [0.25, 2.10]

Analysis 1.36

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 36 Puerperal infection (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 36 Puerperal infection (ALL).

37 Antepartum haemorraghe (ALL) Show forest plot

2

1157

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.48 [0.51, 4.31]

Analysis 1.37

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 37 Antepartum haemorraghe (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 37 Antepartum haemorraghe (ALL).

38 Postpartum haemorraghe (ALL) Show forest plot

5

1554

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.95 [0.51, 1.78]

Analysis 1.38

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 38 Postpartum haemorraghe (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 38 Postpartum haemorraghe (ALL).

39 Transfusion provided (ALL) Show forest plot

3

3453

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.61 [0.38, 0.96]

Analysis 1.39

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 39 Transfusion provided (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 39 Transfusion provided (ALL).

40 Haemoglobin concentration within one month postpartum (ALL) Show forest plot

6

904

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

7.08 [4.70, 9.47]

Analysis 1.40

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 40 Haemoglobin concentration within one month postpartum (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 40 Haemoglobin concentration within one month postpartum (ALL).

41 Severe anaemia at postpartum (Hb less than 80 g/L) (ALL) Show forest plot

7

1094

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.06 [0.00, 1.05]

Analysis 1.41

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 41 Severe anaemia at postpartum (Hb less than 80 g/L) (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 41 Severe anaemia at postpartum (Hb less than 80 g/L) (ALL).

42 Moderate anaemia at postpartum (Hb more than 80 g/L and less than 100 g/L) (ALL) Show forest plot

4

831

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.55 [0.12, 2.51]

Analysis 1.42

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 42 Moderate anaemia at postpartum (Hb more than 80 g/L and less than 100 g/L) (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 42 Moderate anaemia at postpartum (Hb more than 80 g/L and less than 100 g/L) (ALL).

43 Diarrhoea (ALL) Show forest plot

3

1088

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.55 [0.32, 0.93]

Analysis 1.43

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 43 Diarrhoea (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 43 Diarrhoea (ALL).

44 Constipation (ALL) Show forest plot

4

1495

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.95 [0.62, 1.43]

Analysis 1.44

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 44 Constipation (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 44 Constipation (ALL).

45 Nausea (ALL) Show forest plot

4

1377

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.21 [0.72, 2.03]

Analysis 1.45

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 45 Nausea (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 45 Nausea (ALL).

46 Heartburn (ALL) Show forest plot

3

1323

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.19 [0.86, 1.66]

Analysis 1.46

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 46 Heartburn (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 46 Heartburn (ALL).

47 Vomiting (ALL) Show forest plot

4

1392

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.88 [0.59, 1.30]

Analysis 1.47

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 47 Vomiting (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 47 Vomiting (ALL).

48 Maternal death (death while pregnant or within 42 days of termination of pregnancy) (ALL) Show forest plot

1

47

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Analysis 1.48

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 48 Maternal death (death while pregnant or within 42 days of termination of pregnancy) (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 48 Maternal death (death while pregnant or within 42 days of termination of pregnancy) (ALL).

49 Maternal wellbeing/satisfaction (ALL) Show forest plot

2

2604

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.00 [0.91, 1.09]

Analysis 1.49

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 49 Maternal wellbeing/satisfaction (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 49 Maternal wellbeing/satisfaction (ALL).

50 Placental abruption (ALL) Show forest plot

2

2169

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.14 [0.32, 4.06]

Analysis 1.50

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 50 Placental abruption (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 50 Placental abruption (ALL).

51 Premature rupture of membranes (ALL) Show forest plot

1

727

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.99 [0.74, 1.34]

Analysis 1.51

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 51 Premature rupture of membranes (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 51 Premature rupture of membranes (ALL).

52 Pre‐eclampsia (ALL) Show forest plot

2

774

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.58 [0.81, 8.22]

Analysis 1.52

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 52 Pre‐eclampsia (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 52 Pre‐eclampsia (ALL).

91 Small for gestational age (less than 10th percentile weight at birth for gestational age) (not pre‐specified) Show forest plot

4

2511

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.87 [0.58, 1.30]

Analysis 1.91

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 91 Small for gestational age (less than 10th percentile weight at birth for gestational age) (not pre‐specified).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 91 Small for gestational age (less than 10th percentile weight at birth for gestational age) (not pre‐specified).

93 Cesarean delivery (not pre‐specified) Show forest plot

7

4283

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.94 [0.78, 1.13]

Analysis 1.93

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 93 Cesarean delivery (not pre‐specified).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 93 Cesarean delivery (not pre‐specified).

94 Birth length in cm (not pre‐specified) Show forest plot

5

2140

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.38 [0.10, 0.65]

Analysis 1.94

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 94 Birth length in cm (not pre‐specified).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 94 Birth length in cm (not pre‐specified).

95 Forceps or vacuum delivery (not pre‐specified) Show forest plot

2

477

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.50 [0.94, 2.40]

Analysis 1.95

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 95 Forceps or vacuum delivery (not pre‐specified).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 95 Forceps or vacuum delivery (not pre‐specified).

96 Breastfeeding at least 4 months (not pre‐specified) Show forest plot

1

48

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.00 [0.89, 1.13]

Analysis 1.96

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 96 Breastfeeding at least 4 months (not pre‐specified).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 96 Breastfeeding at least 4 months (not pre‐specified).

97 Haemoglobin concentration at 4‐8 weeks' postpartum (g/L) (not pre‐specified) Show forest plot

10

1188

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

5.13 [0.24, 10.02]

Analysis 1.97

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 97 Haemoglobin concentration at 4‐8 weeks' postpartum (g/L) (not pre‐specified).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 97 Haemoglobin concentration at 4‐8 weeks' postpartum (g/L) (not pre‐specified).

98 Apgar score < 7 at 5 minutes (not pre‐specified) Show forest plot

2

475

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.74 [0.17, 3.28]

Analysis 1.98

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 98 Apgar score < 7 at 5 minutes (not pre‐specified).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 98 Apgar score < 7 at 5 minutes (not pre‐specified).

99 Apgar Score at 5 min (not pre‐specified) Show forest plot

2

228

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.27 [‐0.07, 0.62]

Analysis 1.99

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 99 Apgar Score at 5 min (not pre‐specified).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 99 Apgar Score at 5 min (not pre‐specified).

Open in table viewer
Comparison 2. Intermittent iron alone versus daily iron alone

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

3 Birthweight (ALL) Show forest plot

1

41

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐68.0 [‐398.33, 262.33]

Analysis 2.3

Comparison 2 Intermittent iron alone versus daily iron alone, Outcome 3 Birthweight (ALL).

Comparison 2 Intermittent iron alone versus daily iron alone, Outcome 3 Birthweight (ALL).

5 Premature delivery (less than 37 weeks of gestation) (ALL) Show forest plot

1

41

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.46 [0.02, 8.96]

Analysis 2.5

Comparison 2 Intermittent iron alone versus daily iron alone, Outcome 5 Premature delivery (less than 37 weeks of gestation) (ALL).

Comparison 2 Intermittent iron alone versus daily iron alone, Outcome 5 Premature delivery (less than 37 weeks of gestation) (ALL).

12 Haemoconcentration during second or third trimester (Hb more than 130 g/L) (ALL) Show forest plot

2

64

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.54 [0.18, 1.58]

Analysis 2.12

Comparison 2 Intermittent iron alone versus daily iron alone, Outcome 12 Haemoconcentration during second or third trimester (Hb more than 130 g/L) (ALL).

Comparison 2 Intermittent iron alone versus daily iron alone, Outcome 12 Haemoconcentration during second or third trimester (Hb more than 130 g/L) (ALL).

33 Severe anaemia at any time during second and third trimester (Hb less than 70 g/L) (ALL) Show forest plot

2

64

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Analysis 2.33

Comparison 2 Intermittent iron alone versus daily iron alone, Outcome 33 Severe anaemia at any time during second and third trimester (Hb less than 70 g/L) (ALL).

Comparison 2 Intermittent iron alone versus daily iron alone, Outcome 33 Severe anaemia at any time during second and third trimester (Hb less than 70 g/L) (ALL).

34 Moderate anaemia at any time during second or third trimester (ALL) Show forest plot

2

64

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.42 [0.16, 35.56]

Analysis 2.34

Comparison 2 Intermittent iron alone versus daily iron alone, Outcome 34 Moderate anaemia at any time during second or third trimester (ALL).

Comparison 2 Intermittent iron alone versus daily iron alone, Outcome 34 Moderate anaemia at any time during second or third trimester (ALL).

Open in table viewer
Comparison 3. Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Low birthweight (less than 2500 g) (ALL) Show forest plot

2

1368

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.06 [0.28, 4.02]

Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 1 Low birthweight (less than 2500 g) (ALL).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 1 Low birthweight (less than 2500 g) (ALL).

2 Low birthweight (less than 2500 g) (BY SUBGROUPS) Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 3.2

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 2 Low birthweight (less than 2500 g) (BY SUBGROUPS).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 2 Low birthweight (less than 2500 g) (BY SUBGROUPS).

2.1 Early gestational age (less than 20 weeks of gestation or pre‐pregnancy) at start of supplementation

2

1368

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.06 [0.28, 4.02]

2.6 Unspecified/mixed anaemic status at start of supplementation

2

1368

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.06 [0.28, 4.02]

2.7 Daily low dose (60 mg elemental iron or less)

1

1320

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.79 [0.69, 0.91]

2.8 Daily higher dose (more than 60 mg elemental iron)

1

48

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

5.0 [0.25, 98.96]

3 Birthweight (ALL) Show forest plot

2

1365

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

57.73 [7.66, 107.79]

Analysis 3.3

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 3 Birthweight (ALL).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 3 Birthweight (ALL).

4 Birthweight (BY SUBGROUPS) Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 3.4

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 4 Birthweight (BY SUBGROUPS).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 4 Birthweight (BY SUBGROUPS).

4.1 Early gestational age (less than 20 weeks of gestation or pre‐pregnancy) at start of supplementation

2

1365

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

57.73 [7.66, 107.79]

4.6 Unspecified/mixed anaemic status at start of supplementation

2

1365

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

57.73 [7.66, 107.79]

4.7 Daily low dose (60 mg elemental iron or less)

1

1320

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

65.0 [17.46, 112.54]

4.8 Daily higher dose (more than 60 mg elemental iron)

1

45

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐32.0 [‐213.62, 149.62]

5 Premature delivery (less than 37 weeks of gestation) (ALL) Show forest plot

3

1497

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.55 [0.40, 6.00]

Analysis 3.5

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 5 Premature delivery (less than 37 weeks of gestation) (ALL).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 5 Premature delivery (less than 37 weeks of gestation) (ALL).

6 Premature delivery (less than 37 weeks of gestation) (BY SUB GROUPS) Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 3.6

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 6 Premature delivery (less than 37 weeks of gestation) (BY SUB GROUPS).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 6 Premature delivery (less than 37 weeks of gestation) (BY SUB GROUPS).

6.1 Early gestational age (less than 20 weeks of gestation or pre‐pregnancy) at start of supplementation

2

1362

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.13 [0.92, 1.39]

6.2 Late gestational age (20 weeks or more of gestation) at start of supplementation

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.6 Unspecified/mixed anaemic status at start of supplementation

2

1449

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.13 [0.92, 1.39]

6.7 Daily low dose (60 mg elemental iron or less)

2

1449

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.13 [0.92, 1.39]

7 Haemoglobin concentration at term (ALL) Show forest plot

4

179

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

12.00 [2.93, 21.07]

Analysis 3.7

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 7 Haemoglobin concentration at term (ALL).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 7 Haemoglobin concentration at term (ALL).

8 Haemoglobin concentration at term (BY SUBGROUPS) Show forest plot

4

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 3.8

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 8 Haemoglobin concentration at term (BY SUBGROUPS).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 8 Haemoglobin concentration at term (BY SUBGROUPS).

8.1 Early gestational age (less than 20 weeks of gestation or pre‐pregnancy) at start of supplementation

2

93

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

15.65 [11.84, 19.46]

8.2 Late gestational age (20 weeks or more of gestation) at start of supplementation

2

86

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

7.92 [‐11.68, 27.52]

8.5 Non‐anaemic at start of supplementation

1

48

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

17.10 [8.44, 25.76]

8.6 Unspecified/mixed anaemic status at start of supplementation

3

131

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

10.47 [‐1.07, 22.00]

8.7 Daily low dose (60 mg elemental iron or less)

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8.8 Daily higher dose (more than 60 mg elemental iron)

4

179

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

12.00 [2.93, 21.07]

9 Anaemia at term (Hb less than 110 g/L) (ALL) Show forest plot

3

346

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.27 [0.12, 0.56]

Analysis 3.9

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 9 Anaemia at term (Hb less than 110 g/L) (ALL).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 9 Anaemia at term (Hb less than 110 g/L) (ALL).

10 Haemoconcentration at term (Hb more than 130 g/L) (ALL) Show forest plot

3

353

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.74 [0.34, 8.94]

Analysis 3.10

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 10 Haemoconcentration at term (Hb more than 130 g/L) (ALL).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 10 Haemoconcentration at term (Hb more than 130 g/L) (ALL).

11 Haemoconcentration at term (Hb more than 130 g/L) (BY SUBGROUPS) Show forest plot

3

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 3.11

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 11 Haemoconcentration at term (Hb more than 130 g/L) (BY SUBGROUPS).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 11 Haemoconcentration at term (Hb more than 130 g/L) (BY SUBGROUPS).

11.1 Early gestational age (less than 20 weeks of gestation or pre‐pregnancy) at start of supplementation

1

75

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

3.37 [0.19, 60.03]

11.2 Late gestational age (20 weeks or more of gestation) at start of supplementation

3

298

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.97 [0.32, 12.08]

11.6 Unspecified/mixed anaemic status at start of supplementation

1

131

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

4.31 [0.26, 70.41]

11.7 Daily low dose (60 mg elemental iron or less)

1

131

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

4.31 [0.26, 70.41]

11.8 Daily higher dose (more than 60 mg elemental iron)

2

222

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.28 [0.24, 6.78]

12 Haemoconcentration during second or third trimester (ALL) Show forest plot

2

446

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.78 [0.63, 5.04]

Analysis 3.12

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 12 Haemoconcentration during second or third trimester (ALL).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 12 Haemoconcentration during second or third trimester (ALL).

13 Haemoconcentration during second or third trimester (BY SUBGROUPS) Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 3.13

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 13 Haemoconcentration during second or third trimester (BY SUBGROUPS).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 13 Haemoconcentration during second or third trimester (BY SUBGROUPS).

13.1 Early gestational age (less than 20 weeks of gestation or pre‐pregnancy) at start of supplementation

2

390

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.45 [0.33, 6.32]

13.2 Late gestational age (20 weeks or more of gestation) at start of supplementation

1

76

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.34 [0.50, 3.56]

13.3 Unspecified/mixed gestational age at start of supplementation

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

13.5 Non‐anaemic at start of supplementation

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

13.6 Unspecified/mixed anaemic status at start of supplementation

2

446

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.78 [0.63, 5.04]

13.7 Daily low dose (60 mg elemental iron or less)

2

446

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.78 [0.63, 5.04]

13.8 Daily higher dose (more than 60 mg elemental iron)

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

14 Iron deficiency at term (as defined by two or more indicators) (ALL) Show forest plot

1

131

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.24 [0.06, 0.99]

Analysis 3.14

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 14 Iron deficiency at term (as defined by two or more indicators) (ALL).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 14 Iron deficiency at term (as defined by two or more indicators) (ALL).

15 Iron deficiency at term (as defined by two or more indicators) (BY SUBGROUPS) Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 3.15

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 15 Iron deficiency at term (as defined by two or more indicators) (BY SUBGROUPS).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 15 Iron deficiency at term (as defined by two or more indicators) (BY SUBGROUPS).

15.1 Early gestational age (less than 20 weeks of gestation or pre‐pregnancy) at start of supplementation

1

75

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.12 [0.01, 1.10]

15.2 Late gestational age (20 weeks or more of gestation) at start of supplementation

1

76

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.36 [0.08, 1.63]

15.5 Non‐anaemic at start of supplementation

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15.6 Unspecified/mixed anaemic status at start of supplementation

1

131

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.24 [0.06, 0.99]

15.7 Daily low dose (60 mg elemental iron or less)

1

131

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.24 [0.06, 0.99]

15.8 Daily higher dose (more than 60 mg elemental iron)

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16 Iron deficiency anaemia at term (ALL) Show forest plot

1

131

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.43 [0.17, 1.09]

Analysis 3.16

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 16 Iron deficiency anaemia at term (ALL).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 16 Iron deficiency anaemia at term (ALL).

17 Iron deficiency anaemia at term (BY SUBGROUPS) Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 3.17

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 17 Iron deficiency anaemia at term (BY SUBGROUPS).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 17 Iron deficiency anaemia at term (BY SUBGROUPS).

17.1 Early gestational age (less than 20 weeks of gestation or pre‐pregnancy) at start of supplementation

1

75

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.36 [0.12, 1.12]

17.2 Late gestational age (20 weeks or more of gestation) at start of supplementation

1

76

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.5 [0.18, 1.40]

17.5 Non‐anaemic at start of supplementation

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

17.6 Unspecified/mixed anaemic status at start of supplementation

1

131

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.43 [0.17, 1.09]

17.7 Daily low dose (60 mg elemental iron or less)

1

131

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.43 [0.17, 1.09]

17.8 Daily higher dose (more than 60 mg elemental iron)

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

18 Side effects (Any) (ALL) Show forest plot

1

456

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

44.32 [2.77, 709.09]

Analysis 3.18

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 18 Side effects (Any) (ALL).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 18 Side effects (Any) (ALL).

20 Very low birthweight (less than 1500 g) (ALL) Show forest plot

1

48

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

5.0 [0.25, 98.96]

Analysis 3.20

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 20 Very low birthweight (less than 1500 g) (ALL).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 20 Very low birthweight (less than 1500 g) (ALL).

21 Perinatal death (ALL) Show forest plot

3

1862

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.83 [0.58, 1.17]

Analysis 3.21

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 21 Perinatal death (ALL).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 21 Perinatal death (ALL).

29 Admission to special care unit (ALL) Show forest plot

1

48

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Analysis 3.29

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 29 Admission to special care unit (ALL).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 29 Admission to special care unit (ALL).

30 Very premature delivery (less than 34 weeks' gestation) (ALL) Show forest plot

2

92

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

5.0 [0.25, 98.96]

Analysis 3.30

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 30 Very premature delivery (less than 34 weeks' gestation) (ALL).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 30 Very premature delivery (less than 34 weeks' gestation) (ALL).

31 Severe anaemia at term (Hb less than 70 g/L) (ALL) Show forest plot

3

180

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Analysis 3.31

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 31 Severe anaemia at term (Hb less than 70 g/L) (ALL).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 31 Severe anaemia at term (Hb less than 70 g/L) (ALL).

32 Moderate anaemia at term (Hb more than 70g/L and less than 90 g/L) (ALL) Show forest plot

3

180

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Analysis 3.32

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 32 Moderate anaemia at term (Hb more than 70g/L and less than 90 g/L) (ALL).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 32 Moderate anaemia at term (Hb more than 70g/L and less than 90 g/L) (ALL).

33 Severe anaemia at any time during second and third trimester (Hb less than 70 g/L) (ALL) Show forest plot

4

523

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.11 [0.01, 0.83]

Analysis 3.33

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 33 Severe anaemia at any time during second and third trimester (Hb less than 70 g/L) (ALL).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 33 Severe anaemia at any time during second and third trimester (Hb less than 70 g/L) (ALL).

34 Moderate anaemia at any time during second or third trimester (ALL) Show forest plot

4

523

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.34 [0.11, 1.04]

Analysis 3.34

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 34 Moderate anaemia at any time during second or third trimester (ALL).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 34 Moderate anaemia at any time during second or third trimester (ALL).

35 Infection during pregnancy (including urinary tract infections) (ALL) Show forest plot

1

48

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.0 [0.15, 6.53]

Analysis 3.35

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 35 Infection during pregnancy (including urinary tract infections) (ALL).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 35 Infection during pregnancy (including urinary tract infections) (ALL).

36 Puerperal infection (ALL) Show forest plot

1

2863

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.55 [0.13, 2.28]

Analysis 3.36

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 36 Puerperal infection (ALL).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 36 Puerperal infection (ALL).

37 Antepartum haemorrhage (ALL) Show forest plot

2

145

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.25 [0.22, 7.12]

Analysis 3.37

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 37 Antepartum haemorrhage (ALL).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 37 Antepartum haemorrhage (ALL).

38 Postpartum haemorrhage (ALL) Show forest plot

1

68

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.12 [0.00, 2.71]

Analysis 3.38

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 38 Postpartum haemorrhage (ALL).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 38 Postpartum haemorrhage (ALL).

40 Haemoglobin concentration within one month postpartum (ALL) Show forest plot

1

45

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

10.40 [4.03, 16.77]

Analysis 3.40

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 40 Haemoglobin concentration within one month postpartum (ALL).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 40 Haemoglobin concentration within one month postpartum (ALL).

41 Severe anaemia at postpartum (Hb less than 80 g/L) (ALL) Show forest plot

3

525

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.05 [0.00, 0.76]

Analysis 3.41

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 41 Severe anaemia at postpartum (Hb less than 80 g/L) (ALL).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 41 Severe anaemia at postpartum (Hb less than 80 g/L) (ALL).

42 Moderate anaemia at postpartum (Hb more than 80 g/L and less than 100 g/L) (ALL) Show forest plot

3

525

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.34 [0.17, 0.69]

Analysis 3.42

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 42 Moderate anaemia at postpartum (Hb more than 80 g/L and less than 100 g/L) (ALL).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 42 Moderate anaemia at postpartum (Hb more than 80 g/L and less than 100 g/L) (ALL).

48 Maternal death (death while pregnant or within 42 days of termination of pregnancy) (ALL) Show forest plot

1

131

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Analysis 3.48

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 48 Maternal death (death while pregnant or within 42 days of termination of pregnancy) (ALL).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 48 Maternal death (death while pregnant or within 42 days of termination of pregnancy) (ALL).

50 Placental abruption (ALL) Show forest plot

1

2863

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

8.19 [0.49, 138.16]

Analysis 3.50

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 50 Placental abruption (ALL).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 50 Placental abruption (ALL).

52 Pre‐eclampsia (ALL) Show forest plot

1

48

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

3.00 [0.13, 70.16]

Analysis 3.52

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 52 Pre‐eclampsia (ALL).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 52 Pre‐eclampsia (ALL).

91 Small for gestational age (less than 10th percentile weight at birth for gestational age) (not pre‐specified) Show forest plot

1

1318

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.88 [0.80, 0.97]

Analysis 3.91

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 91 Small for gestational age (less than 10th percentile weight at birth for gestational age) (not pre‐specified).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 91 Small for gestational age (less than 10th percentile weight at birth for gestational age) (not pre‐specified).

92 Oedema during pregnancy (not pre‐specified) Show forest plot

1

67

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.82 [0.99, 8.09]

Analysis 3.92

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 92 Oedema during pregnancy (not pre‐specified).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 92 Oedema during pregnancy (not pre‐specified).

93 Caesarean delivery (not pre‐specified) Show forest plot

1

97

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.83 [0.22, 3.13]

Analysis 3.93

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 93 Caesarean delivery (not pre‐specified).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 93 Caesarean delivery (not pre‐specified).

94 Birth length in cm (not pre‐specified) Show forest plot

1

1320

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.20 [‐0.06, 0.46]

Analysis 3.94

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 94 Birth length in cm (not pre‐specified).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 94 Birth length in cm (not pre‐specified).

97 Haemoglobin concentration at 4‐8 weeks postpartum (not prespecified) Show forest plot

3

526

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

4.88 [‐0.85, 10.62]

Analysis 3.97

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 97 Haemoglobin concentration at 4‐8 weeks postpartum (not prespecified).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 97 Haemoglobin concentration at 4‐8 weeks postpartum (not prespecified).

Open in table viewer
Comparison 4. Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Low birthweight (less than 2500 g) (ALL) Show forest plot

4

730

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.05 [0.58, 1.91]

Analysis 4.1

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 1 Low birthweight (less than 2500 g) (ALL).

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 1 Low birthweight (less than 2500 g) (ALL).

2 Low birthweight (less than 2500 g) (BY SUBGROUPS) Show forest plot

4

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 4.2

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 2 Low birthweight (less than 2500 g) (BY SUBGROUPS).

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 2 Low birthweight (less than 2500 g) (BY SUBGROUPS).

2.1 Early gestational age (less than 20 weeks of gestation or pre‐pregnancy) at start of supplementation

2

455

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.29 [0.55, 3.01]

2.3 Unspecified/mixed gestational age at start of supplementation

2

275

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.85 [0.36, 1.99]

2.5 Non‐anaemic at start of supplementation

1

80

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.25 [0.36, 4.32]

2.7 Daily low dose (60 mg elemental iron or less)

3

650

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.99 [0.50, 1.97]

2.8 Daily higher dose (more than 60 mg elemental iron)

1

80

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.25 [0.36, 4.32]

3 Birthweight (ALL) Show forest plot

4

730

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐7.10 [‐67.20, 53.01]

Analysis 4.3

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 3 Birthweight (ALL).

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 3 Birthweight (ALL).

4 Birthweight (BY SUBGROUPS) Show forest plot

4

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 4.4

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 4 Birthweight (BY SUBGROUPS).

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 4 Birthweight (BY SUBGROUPS).

4.1 Early gestational age (less than 20 weeks of gestation or pre‐pregnancy) at start of supplementation

2

455

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.19 [‐70.50, 72.87]

4.3 Unspecified/mixed gestational age at start of supplementation

2

275

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐26.71 [‐137.00, 83.58]

4.5 Non‐anaemic at start of supplementation

1

80

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [‐154.95, 154.95]

4.7 Daily low dose (60 mg elemental iron or less)

3

650

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐8.36 [‐73.56, 56.85]

4.8 Daily higher dose (more than 60 mg elemental iron)

1

80

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [‐154.95, 154.95]

5 Premature delivery (less than 37 weeks of gestation) (ALL) Show forest plot

1

80

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.0 [0.39, 10.31]

Analysis 4.5

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 5 Premature delivery (less than 37 weeks of gestation) (ALL).

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 5 Premature delivery (less than 37 weeks of gestation) (ALL).

7 Haemoglobin concentration at term (ALL) Show forest plot

3

475

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.83 [‐4.74, 3.08]

Analysis 4.7

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 7 Haemoglobin concentration at term (ALL).

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 7 Haemoglobin concentration at term (ALL).

8 Haemoglobin concentration at term (BY SUBGROUPS) Show forest plot

3

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 4.8

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 8 Haemoglobin concentration at term (BY SUBGROUPS).

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 8 Haemoglobin concentration at term (BY SUBGROUPS).

8.3 Unspecified/mixed gestational age at start of supplementation

2

301

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐2.19 [‐6.85, 2.47]

8.7 Daily low dose (60 mg elemental iron or less)

3

422

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.10 [‐5.15, 4.95]

8.8 Daily higher dose (more than 60 mg elemental iron)

1

109

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.82 [‐4.99, 3.35]

9 Anaemia at term (Hb < 110 g/L) (ALL) Show forest plot

3

475

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.20 [0.78, 1.83]

Analysis 4.9

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 9 Anaemia at term (Hb < 110 g/L) (ALL).

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 9 Anaemia at term (Hb < 110 g/L) (ALL).

10 Haemoconcentration at term (Hb more than 130 g/L) (ALL) Show forest plot

3

475

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.93 [0.47, 1.82]

Analysis 4.10

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 10 Haemoconcentration at term (Hb more than 130 g/L) (ALL).

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 10 Haemoconcentration at term (Hb more than 130 g/L) (ALL).

11 Haemoconcentration at term (Hb more than 130 g/L) (BY SUBGROUPS) Show forest plot

3

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 4.11

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 11 Haemoconcentration at term (Hb more than 130 g/L) (BY SUBGROUPS).

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 11 Haemoconcentration at term (Hb more than 130 g/L) (BY SUBGROUPS).

11.7 Daily low dose (60 mg elemental iron or less)

3

422

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.24 [0.42, 3.66]

11.8 Daily higher dose (more than 60 mg elemental iron)

1

109

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.63 [0.19, 2.11]

12 Haemoconcentration during second or third trimester (Hb more than 130 g/L) (ALL) Show forest plot

6

1111

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.43 [0.24, 0.77]

Analysis 4.12

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 12 Haemoconcentration during second or third trimester (Hb more than 130 g/L) (ALL).

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 12 Haemoconcentration during second or third trimester (Hb more than 130 g/L) (ALL).

13 Haemoconcentration during second or third trimester (Hb more than 130 g/L) (BY SUBGROUPS) Show forest plot

6

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 4.13

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 13 Haemoconcentration during second or third trimester (Hb more than 130 g/L) (BY SUBGROUPS).

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 13 Haemoconcentration during second or third trimester (Hb more than 130 g/L) (BY SUBGROUPS).

13.1 Early gestational age (less than 20 weeks of gestation or pre‐pregnancy) at start of supplementation

2

250

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.52 [0.26, 1.01]

13.2 Late gestational age (20 weeks or more of gestation) at start of supplementation

1

166

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.24 [0.10, 0.55]

13.3 Unspecified/mixed gestational age at start of supplementation

3

695

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.46 [0.13, 1.65]

13.4 Anaemic at start of supplementation (Hb <110 g/L if in first or <105 g/L if in second trimester)

1

47

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

13.5 Non‐anaemic at start of supplementation

1

80

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.6 [0.15, 2.34]

13.6 Unspecified/mixed anaemic status at start of supplementation

4

966

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.41 [0.21, 0.80]

13.7 Daily low dose (60 mg elemental iron or less)

5

953

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.41 [0.20, 0.82]

13.8 Daily higher dose (more than 60 mg elemental iron)

2

247

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.74 [0.42, 1.31]

16 Iron deficiency anaemia at term (based on two or more indicators) (ALL) Show forest plot

1

156

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.71 [0.08, 6.63]

Analysis 4.16

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 16 Iron deficiency anaemia at term (based on two or more indicators) (ALL).

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 16 Iron deficiency anaemia at term (based on two or more indicators) (ALL).

18 Side effects (any) (ALL) Show forest plot

7

1307

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.69 [0.45, 1.04]

Analysis 4.18

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 18 Side effects (any) (ALL).

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 18 Side effects (any) (ALL).

19 Side effects (any) (BY SUBGROUPS) Show forest plot

7

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 4.19

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 19 Side effects (any) (BY SUBGROUPS).

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 19 Side effects (any) (BY SUBGROUPS).

19.1 Early gestational age (less than 20 weeks or pre‐pregnancy) at start of supplementation

1

80

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.2 [0.08, 0.53]

19.2 Late gestational age (20 weeks or more of gestation) at start of supplementation

1

172

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.0 [0.79, 1.27]

19.3 Unspecified/mixed gestational age at start of supplementation

5

1055

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.72 [0.42, 1.26]

19.4 Non‐anaemic at start of supplementation

1

80

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.2 [0.08, 0.53]

19.7 Daily low dose (60 mg elemental iron or less)

6

1171

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.92 [0.71, 1.19]

19.8 Daily higher dose (more than 60 mg elemental iron)

2

253

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.14 [0.07, 0.25]

20 Very low birthweight (less than 1500 g) (ALL) Show forest plot

4

737

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Analysis 4.20

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 20 Very low birthweight (less than 1500 g) (ALL).

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 20 Very low birthweight (less than 1500 g) (ALL).

21 Perinatal death (ALL) Show forest plot

1

80

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Analysis 4.21

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 21 Perinatal death (ALL).

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 21 Perinatal death (ALL).

27 Infant ferritin concentration at 6 months (ug/L) (ALL) Show forest plot

1

88

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.09 [0.05, 0.13]

Analysis 4.27

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 27 Infant ferritin concentration at 6 months (ug/L) (ALL).

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 27 Infant ferritin concentration at 6 months (ug/L) (ALL).

30 Very premature delivery (less than 34 weeks of gestation) (ALL) Show forest plot

1

111

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.98 [0.06, 15.31]

Analysis 4.30

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 30 Very premature delivery (less than 34 weeks of gestation) (ALL).

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 30 Very premature delivery (less than 34 weeks of gestation) (ALL).

31 Severe anaemia at term (Hb less than 70 g/L) (ALL) Show forest plot

4

555

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Analysis 4.31

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 31 Severe anaemia at term (Hb less than 70 g/L) (ALL).

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 31 Severe anaemia at term (Hb less than 70 g/L) (ALL).

32 Moderate anaemia at term (Hb more than 70g/L and less than 90 g/L) (ALL) Show forest plot

3

475

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.03 [0.07, 16.23]

Analysis 4.32

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 32 Moderate anaemia at term (Hb more than 70g/L and less than 90 g/L) (ALL).

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 32 Moderate anaemia at term (Hb more than 70g/L and less than 90 g/L) (ALL).

33 Severe anaemia at any time during second and third trimester (Hb less than 70 g/L) (ALL) Show forest plot

6

1240

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Analysis 4.33

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 33 Severe anaemia at any time during second and third trimester (Hb less than 70 g/L) (ALL).

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 33 Severe anaemia at any time during second and third trimester (Hb less than 70 g/L) (ALL).

34 Moderate anaemia at any time during second or third trimester (ALL) Show forest plot

6

1111

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.54 [0.63, 10.17]

Analysis 4.34

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 34 Moderate anaemia at any time during second or third trimester (ALL).

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 34 Moderate anaemia at any time during second or third trimester (ALL).

37 Antepartum haemorraghe (ALL) Show forest plot

1

110

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.0 [0.06, 15.59]

Analysis 4.37

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 37 Antepartum haemorraghe (ALL).

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 37 Antepartum haemorraghe (ALL).

41 Severe anaemia at postpartum (Hb less than 80 g/L) (ALL) Show forest plot

1

169

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.43 [0.04, 4.64]

Analysis 4.41

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 41 Severe anaemia at postpartum (Hb less than 80 g/L) (ALL).

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 41 Severe anaemia at postpartum (Hb less than 80 g/L) (ALL).

42 Moderate anaemia at postpartum (Hb more than 80 g/L and less than 100 g/L) (ALL) Show forest plot

1

169

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.14 [0.26, 4.95]

Analysis 4.42

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 42 Moderate anaemia at postpartum (Hb more than 80 g/L and less than 100 g/L) (ALL).

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 42 Moderate anaemia at postpartum (Hb more than 80 g/L and less than 100 g/L) (ALL).

43 Diarrhoea (ALL) Show forest plot

4

553

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.94 [0.38, 2.34]

Analysis 4.43

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 43 Diarrhoea (ALL).

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 43 Diarrhoea (ALL).

44 Constipation (ALL) Show forest plot

4

553

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.99 [0.48, 2.06]

Analysis 4.44

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 44 Constipation (ALL).

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 44 Constipation (ALL).

45 Nausea (ALL) Show forest plot

5

854

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.59 [0.30, 1.16]

Analysis 4.45

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 45 Nausea (ALL).

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 45 Nausea (ALL).

46 Heartburn (ALL) Show forest plot

3

473

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.78 [0.29, 2.06]

Analysis 4.46

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 46 Heartburn (ALL).

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 46 Heartburn (ALL).

47 Vomiting (ALL) Show forest plot

5

854

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.44 [0.82, 2.53]

Analysis 4.47

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 47 Vomiting (ALL).

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 47 Vomiting (ALL).

50 Placental abruption (ALL) Show forest plot

1

110

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.33 [0.01, 8.01]

Analysis 4.50

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 50 Placental abruption (ALL).

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 50 Placental abruption (ALL).

51 Premature rupture of membranes (ALL) Show forest plot

1

80

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.33 [0.01, 7.95]

Analysis 4.51

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 51 Premature rupture of membranes (ALL).

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 51 Premature rupture of membranes (ALL).

68 Ln (serum ferritin concentration) 4‐8 wk postpartum (not pre‐specified) Show forest plot

1

160

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.13 [‐0.42, 0.16]

Analysis 4.68

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 68 Ln (serum ferritin concentration) 4‐8 wk postpartum (not pre‐specified).

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 68 Ln (serum ferritin concentration) 4‐8 wk postpartum (not pre‐specified).

70 Low serum ferritin concentration at postpartum (4‐8 wk) (not pre‐specified) Show forest plot

1

146

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.19 [0.40, 3.57]

Analysis 4.70

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 70 Low serum ferritin concentration at postpartum (4‐8 wk) (not pre‐specified).

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 70 Low serum ferritin concentration at postpartum (4‐8 wk) (not pre‐specified).

71 High serum transferrin receptors at 6 weeks postpartum (not pre‐specified) Show forest plot

1

146

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.69 [0.36, 1.33]

Analysis 4.71

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 71 High serum transferrin receptors at 6 weeks postpartum (not pre‐specified).

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 71 High serum transferrin receptors at 6 weeks postpartum (not pre‐specified).

93 Caesarean delivery (not pre‐specified) Show forest plot

1

80

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.89 [0.38, 2.07]

Analysis 4.93

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 93 Caesarean delivery (not pre‐specified).

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 93 Caesarean delivery (not pre‐specified).

97 Haemoglobin concentration at 4‐8 weeks postpartum (not pre‐specified) Show forest plot

1

146

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

2.0 [‐3.86, 7.86]

Analysis 4.97

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 97 Haemoglobin concentration at 4‐8 weeks postpartum (not pre‐specified).

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 97 Haemoglobin concentration at 4‐8 weeks postpartum (not pre‐specified).

Funnel plot of comparison: 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, outcome: 1.7 Maternal Hb concentration at term (g/L) (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Funnel plot of comparison: 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, outcome: 1.7 Maternal Hb concentration at term (g/L) (ALL).

Funnel plot of comparison: 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, outcome: 1.9 Anaemia at term (Hb less than 110 g/L).
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

Funnel plot of comparison: 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, outcome: 1.9 Anaemia at term (Hb less than 110 g/L).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 1 Low birthweight (less than 2500 g) (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 1 Low birthweight (less than 2500 g) (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 2 Low birthweight (less than 2500 g) (BY SUBGROUPS).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 2 Low birthweight (less than 2500 g) (BY SUBGROUPS).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 3 Birthweight (g) (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 3 Birthweight (g) (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 4 Birthweight (g) (BY SUBGROUPS).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 4 Birthweight (g) (BY SUBGROUPS).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 5 Premature delivery (less than 37 weeks of gestation) (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 5 Premature delivery (less than 37 weeks of gestation) (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 6 Premature delivery (less 37 weeks of gestation) (BY SUBGROUPS).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 6 Premature delivery (less 37 weeks of gestation) (BY SUBGROUPS).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 7 Maternal Hb concentration at term (g/L) (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.7

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 7 Maternal Hb concentration at term (g/L) (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 8 Maternal Hb concentration at term (g/L) (BY SUBGROUPS).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.8

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 8 Maternal Hb concentration at term (g/L) (BY SUBGROUPS).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 9 Anaemia at term (Hb less than 110 g/L) (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.9

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 9 Anaemia at term (Hb less than 110 g/L) (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 10 Haemoconcentration at term (Hb more than 130 g/L) (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.10

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 10 Haemoconcentration at term (Hb more than 130 g/L) (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 11 Haemoconcentration at term (Hb more than 130 g/L) (BY SUBGROUPS).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.11

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 11 Haemoconcentration at term (Hb more than 130 g/L) (BY SUBGROUPS).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 12 Haemoconcentration during second or third trimester (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.12

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 12 Haemoconcentration during second or third trimester (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 13 Haemoconcentration during second or third trimester (BY SUBGROUPS).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.13

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 13 Haemoconcentration during second or third trimester (BY SUBGROUPS).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 14 Iron deficiency at term (as defined by two or more indicators) (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.14

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 14 Iron deficiency at term (as defined by two or more indicators) (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 15 Iron deficiency at term (as defined by two or more indicators) (BY SUBGROUPS).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.15

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 15 Iron deficiency at term (as defined by two or more indicators) (BY SUBGROUPS).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 16 Iron deficiency anaemia at term (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.16

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 16 Iron deficiency anaemia at term (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 17 Iron deficiency anaemia at term (BY SUBGROUPS).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.17

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 17 Iron deficiency anaemia at term (BY SUBGROUPS).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 18 Side‐effects (Any) (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.18

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 18 Side‐effects (Any) (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 19 Side‐effects (Any) (BY SUBGROUPS).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.19

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 19 Side‐effects (Any) (BY SUBGROUPS).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 20 Very low birthweight (less than 1500 g) (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.20

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 20 Very low birthweight (less than 1500 g) (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 21 Perinatal death (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.21

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 21 Perinatal death (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 24 Infant Hb concentration at 3 months (g/L) (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.24

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 24 Infant Hb concentration at 3 months (g/L) (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 25 Infant serum ferritin concentration at 3 months (ug/L) (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.25

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 25 Infant serum ferritin concentration at 3 months (ug/L) (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 26 Infant Hb concentration at 6 months (g/L) (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.26

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 26 Infant Hb concentration at 6 months (g/L) (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 27 Infant serum ferritin concentration at 6 months (ug/L) (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.27

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 27 Infant serum ferritin concentration at 6 months (ug/L) (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 29 Admission to special care unit (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.29

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 29 Admission to special care unit (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 30 Very premature delivery (less than 34 weeks' gestation) (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.30

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 30 Very premature delivery (less than 34 weeks' gestation) (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 31 Severe anaemia at term (Hb less than 70 g/L) (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.31

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 31 Severe anaemia at term (Hb less than 70 g/L) (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 32 Moderate anaemia at term (Hb more than 70 g/L and less than 90 g/L) (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.32

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 32 Moderate anaemia at term (Hb more than 70 g/L and less than 90 g/L) (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 33 Severe anaemia at any time during second and third trimester (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.33

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 33 Severe anaemia at any time during second and third trimester (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 34 Moderate anaemia at any time during second or third trimester (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.34

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 34 Moderate anaemia at any time during second or third trimester (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 35 Infection during pregnancy (including urinary tract infections) (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.35

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 35 Infection during pregnancy (including urinary tract infections) (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 36 Puerperal infection (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.36

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 36 Puerperal infection (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 37 Antepartum haemorraghe (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.37

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 37 Antepartum haemorraghe (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 38 Postpartum haemorraghe (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.38

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 38 Postpartum haemorraghe (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 39 Transfusion provided (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.39

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 39 Transfusion provided (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 40 Haemoglobin concentration within one month postpartum (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.40

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 40 Haemoglobin concentration within one month postpartum (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 41 Severe anaemia at postpartum (Hb less than 80 g/L) (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.41

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 41 Severe anaemia at postpartum (Hb less than 80 g/L) (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 42 Moderate anaemia at postpartum (Hb more than 80 g/L and less than 100 g/L) (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.42

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 42 Moderate anaemia at postpartum (Hb more than 80 g/L and less than 100 g/L) (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 43 Diarrhoea (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.43

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 43 Diarrhoea (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 44 Constipation (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.44

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 44 Constipation (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 45 Nausea (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.45

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 45 Nausea (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 46 Heartburn (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.46

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 46 Heartburn (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 47 Vomiting (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.47

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 47 Vomiting (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 48 Maternal death (death while pregnant or within 42 days of termination of pregnancy) (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.48

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 48 Maternal death (death while pregnant or within 42 days of termination of pregnancy) (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 49 Maternal wellbeing/satisfaction (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.49

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 49 Maternal wellbeing/satisfaction (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 50 Placental abruption (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.50

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 50 Placental abruption (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 51 Premature rupture of membranes (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.51

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 51 Premature rupture of membranes (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 52 Pre‐eclampsia (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.52

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 52 Pre‐eclampsia (ALL).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 91 Small for gestational age (less than 10th percentile weight at birth for gestational age) (not pre‐specified).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.91

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 91 Small for gestational age (less than 10th percentile weight at birth for gestational age) (not pre‐specified).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 93 Cesarean delivery (not pre‐specified).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.93

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 93 Cesarean delivery (not pre‐specified).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 94 Birth length in cm (not pre‐specified).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.94

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 94 Birth length in cm (not pre‐specified).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 95 Forceps or vacuum delivery (not pre‐specified).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.95

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 95 Forceps or vacuum delivery (not pre‐specified).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 96 Breastfeeding at least 4 months (not pre‐specified).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.96

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 96 Breastfeeding at least 4 months (not pre‐specified).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 97 Haemoglobin concentration at 4‐8 weeks' postpartum (g/L) (not pre‐specified).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.97

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 97 Haemoglobin concentration at 4‐8 weeks' postpartum (g/L) (not pre‐specified).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 98 Apgar score < 7 at 5 minutes (not pre‐specified).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.98

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 98 Apgar score < 7 at 5 minutes (not pre‐specified).

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 99 Apgar Score at 5 min (not pre‐specified).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.99

Comparison 1 Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 99 Apgar Score at 5 min (not pre‐specified).

Comparison 2 Intermittent iron alone versus daily iron alone, Outcome 3 Birthweight (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.3

Comparison 2 Intermittent iron alone versus daily iron alone, Outcome 3 Birthweight (ALL).

Comparison 2 Intermittent iron alone versus daily iron alone, Outcome 5 Premature delivery (less than 37 weeks of gestation) (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.5

Comparison 2 Intermittent iron alone versus daily iron alone, Outcome 5 Premature delivery (less than 37 weeks of gestation) (ALL).

Comparison 2 Intermittent iron alone versus daily iron alone, Outcome 12 Haemoconcentration during second or third trimester (Hb more than 130 g/L) (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.12

Comparison 2 Intermittent iron alone versus daily iron alone, Outcome 12 Haemoconcentration during second or third trimester (Hb more than 130 g/L) (ALL).

Comparison 2 Intermittent iron alone versus daily iron alone, Outcome 33 Severe anaemia at any time during second and third trimester (Hb less than 70 g/L) (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.33

Comparison 2 Intermittent iron alone versus daily iron alone, Outcome 33 Severe anaemia at any time during second and third trimester (Hb less than 70 g/L) (ALL).

Comparison 2 Intermittent iron alone versus daily iron alone, Outcome 34 Moderate anaemia at any time during second or third trimester (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.34

Comparison 2 Intermittent iron alone versus daily iron alone, Outcome 34 Moderate anaemia at any time during second or third trimester (ALL).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 1 Low birthweight (less than 2500 g) (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 1 Low birthweight (less than 2500 g) (ALL).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 2 Low birthweight (less than 2500 g) (BY SUBGROUPS).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.2

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 2 Low birthweight (less than 2500 g) (BY SUBGROUPS).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 3 Birthweight (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.3

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 3 Birthweight (ALL).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 4 Birthweight (BY SUBGROUPS).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.4

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 4 Birthweight (BY SUBGROUPS).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 5 Premature delivery (less than 37 weeks of gestation) (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.5

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 5 Premature delivery (less than 37 weeks of gestation) (ALL).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 6 Premature delivery (less than 37 weeks of gestation) (BY SUB GROUPS).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.6

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 6 Premature delivery (less than 37 weeks of gestation) (BY SUB GROUPS).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 7 Haemoglobin concentration at term (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.7

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 7 Haemoglobin concentration at term (ALL).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 8 Haemoglobin concentration at term (BY SUBGROUPS).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.8

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 8 Haemoglobin concentration at term (BY SUBGROUPS).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 9 Anaemia at term (Hb less than 110 g/L) (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.9

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 9 Anaemia at term (Hb less than 110 g/L) (ALL).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 10 Haemoconcentration at term (Hb more than 130 g/L) (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.10

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 10 Haemoconcentration at term (Hb more than 130 g/L) (ALL).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 11 Haemoconcentration at term (Hb more than 130 g/L) (BY SUBGROUPS).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.11

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 11 Haemoconcentration at term (Hb more than 130 g/L) (BY SUBGROUPS).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 12 Haemoconcentration during second or third trimester (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.12

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 12 Haemoconcentration during second or third trimester (ALL).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 13 Haemoconcentration during second or third trimester (BY SUBGROUPS).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.13

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 13 Haemoconcentration during second or third trimester (BY SUBGROUPS).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 14 Iron deficiency at term (as defined by two or more indicators) (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.14

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 14 Iron deficiency at term (as defined by two or more indicators) (ALL).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 15 Iron deficiency at term (as defined by two or more indicators) (BY SUBGROUPS).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.15

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 15 Iron deficiency at term (as defined by two or more indicators) (BY SUBGROUPS).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 16 Iron deficiency anaemia at term (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.16

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 16 Iron deficiency anaemia at term (ALL).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 17 Iron deficiency anaemia at term (BY SUBGROUPS).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.17

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 17 Iron deficiency anaemia at term (BY SUBGROUPS).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 18 Side effects (Any) (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.18

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 18 Side effects (Any) (ALL).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 20 Very low birthweight (less than 1500 g) (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.20

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 20 Very low birthweight (less than 1500 g) (ALL).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 21 Perinatal death (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.21

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 21 Perinatal death (ALL).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 29 Admission to special care unit (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.29

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 29 Admission to special care unit (ALL).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 30 Very premature delivery (less than 34 weeks' gestation) (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.30

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 30 Very premature delivery (less than 34 weeks' gestation) (ALL).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 31 Severe anaemia at term (Hb less than 70 g/L) (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.31

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 31 Severe anaemia at term (Hb less than 70 g/L) (ALL).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 32 Moderate anaemia at term (Hb more than 70g/L and less than 90 g/L) (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.32

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 32 Moderate anaemia at term (Hb more than 70g/L and less than 90 g/L) (ALL).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 33 Severe anaemia at any time during second and third trimester (Hb less than 70 g/L) (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.33

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 33 Severe anaemia at any time during second and third trimester (Hb less than 70 g/L) (ALL).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 34 Moderate anaemia at any time during second or third trimester (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.34

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 34 Moderate anaemia at any time during second or third trimester (ALL).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 35 Infection during pregnancy (including urinary tract infections) (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.35

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 35 Infection during pregnancy (including urinary tract infections) (ALL).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 36 Puerperal infection (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.36

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 36 Puerperal infection (ALL).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 37 Antepartum haemorrhage (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.37

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 37 Antepartum haemorrhage (ALL).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 38 Postpartum haemorrhage (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.38

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 38 Postpartum haemorrhage (ALL).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 40 Haemoglobin concentration within one month postpartum (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.40

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 40 Haemoglobin concentration within one month postpartum (ALL).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 41 Severe anaemia at postpartum (Hb less than 80 g/L) (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.41

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 41 Severe anaemia at postpartum (Hb less than 80 g/L) (ALL).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 42 Moderate anaemia at postpartum (Hb more than 80 g/L and less than 100 g/L) (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.42

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 42 Moderate anaemia at postpartum (Hb more than 80 g/L and less than 100 g/L) (ALL).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 48 Maternal death (death while pregnant or within 42 days of termination of pregnancy) (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.48

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 48 Maternal death (death while pregnant or within 42 days of termination of pregnancy) (ALL).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 50 Placental abruption (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.50

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 50 Placental abruption (ALL).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 52 Pre‐eclampsia (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.52

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 52 Pre‐eclampsia (ALL).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 91 Small for gestational age (less than 10th percentile weight at birth for gestational age) (not pre‐specified).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.91

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 91 Small for gestational age (less than 10th percentile weight at birth for gestational age) (not pre‐specified).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 92 Oedema during pregnancy (not pre‐specified).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.92

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 92 Oedema during pregnancy (not pre‐specified).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 93 Caesarean delivery (not pre‐specified).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.93

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 93 Caesarean delivery (not pre‐specified).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 94 Birth length in cm (not pre‐specified).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.94

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 94 Birth length in cm (not pre‐specified).

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 97 Haemoglobin concentration at 4‐8 weeks postpartum (not prespecified).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.97

Comparison 3 Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo, Outcome 97 Haemoglobin concentration at 4‐8 weeks postpartum (not prespecified).

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 1 Low birthweight (less than 2500 g) (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.1

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 1 Low birthweight (less than 2500 g) (ALL).

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 2 Low birthweight (less than 2500 g) (BY SUBGROUPS).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.2

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 2 Low birthweight (less than 2500 g) (BY SUBGROUPS).

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 3 Birthweight (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.3

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 3 Birthweight (ALL).

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 4 Birthweight (BY SUBGROUPS).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.4

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 4 Birthweight (BY SUBGROUPS).

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 5 Premature delivery (less than 37 weeks of gestation) (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.5

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 5 Premature delivery (less than 37 weeks of gestation) (ALL).

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 7 Haemoglobin concentration at term (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.7

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 7 Haemoglobin concentration at term (ALL).

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 8 Haemoglobin concentration at term (BY SUBGROUPS).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.8

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 8 Haemoglobin concentration at term (BY SUBGROUPS).

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 9 Anaemia at term (Hb < 110 g/L) (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.9

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 9 Anaemia at term (Hb < 110 g/L) (ALL).

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 10 Haemoconcentration at term (Hb more than 130 g/L) (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.10

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 10 Haemoconcentration at term (Hb more than 130 g/L) (ALL).

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 11 Haemoconcentration at term (Hb more than 130 g/L) (BY SUBGROUPS).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.11

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 11 Haemoconcentration at term (Hb more than 130 g/L) (BY SUBGROUPS).

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 12 Haemoconcentration during second or third trimester (Hb more than 130 g/L) (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.12

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 12 Haemoconcentration during second or third trimester (Hb more than 130 g/L) (ALL).

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 13 Haemoconcentration during second or third trimester (Hb more than 130 g/L) (BY SUBGROUPS).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.13

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 13 Haemoconcentration during second or third trimester (Hb more than 130 g/L) (BY SUBGROUPS).

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 16 Iron deficiency anaemia at term (based on two or more indicators) (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.16

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 16 Iron deficiency anaemia at term (based on two or more indicators) (ALL).

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 18 Side effects (any) (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.18

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 18 Side effects (any) (ALL).

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 19 Side effects (any) (BY SUBGROUPS).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.19

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 19 Side effects (any) (BY SUBGROUPS).

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 20 Very low birthweight (less than 1500 g) (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.20

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 20 Very low birthweight (less than 1500 g) (ALL).

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 21 Perinatal death (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.21

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 21 Perinatal death (ALL).

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 27 Infant ferritin concentration at 6 months (ug/L) (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.27

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 27 Infant ferritin concentration at 6 months (ug/L) (ALL).

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 30 Very premature delivery (less than 34 weeks of gestation) (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.30

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 30 Very premature delivery (less than 34 weeks of gestation) (ALL).

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 31 Severe anaemia at term (Hb less than 70 g/L) (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.31

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 31 Severe anaemia at term (Hb less than 70 g/L) (ALL).

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 32 Moderate anaemia at term (Hb more than 70g/L and less than 90 g/L) (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.32

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 32 Moderate anaemia at term (Hb more than 70g/L and less than 90 g/L) (ALL).

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 33 Severe anaemia at any time during second and third trimester (Hb less than 70 g/L) (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.33

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 33 Severe anaemia at any time during second and third trimester (Hb less than 70 g/L) (ALL).

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 34 Moderate anaemia at any time during second or third trimester (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.34

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 34 Moderate anaemia at any time during second or third trimester (ALL).

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 37 Antepartum haemorraghe (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.37

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 37 Antepartum haemorraghe (ALL).

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 41 Severe anaemia at postpartum (Hb less than 80 g/L) (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.41

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 41 Severe anaemia at postpartum (Hb less than 80 g/L) (ALL).

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 42 Moderate anaemia at postpartum (Hb more than 80 g/L and less than 100 g/L) (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.42

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 42 Moderate anaemia at postpartum (Hb more than 80 g/L and less than 100 g/L) (ALL).

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 43 Diarrhoea (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.43

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 43 Diarrhoea (ALL).

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 44 Constipation (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.44

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 44 Constipation (ALL).

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 45 Nausea (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.45

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 45 Nausea (ALL).

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 46 Heartburn (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.46

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 46 Heartburn (ALL).

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 47 Vomiting (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.47

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 47 Vomiting (ALL).

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 50 Placental abruption (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.50

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 50 Placental abruption (ALL).

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 51 Premature rupture of membranes (ALL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.51

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 51 Premature rupture of membranes (ALL).

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 68 Ln (serum ferritin concentration) 4‐8 wk postpartum (not pre‐specified).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.68

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 68 Ln (serum ferritin concentration) 4‐8 wk postpartum (not pre‐specified).

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 70 Low serum ferritin concentration at postpartum (4‐8 wk) (not pre‐specified).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.70

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 70 Low serum ferritin concentration at postpartum (4‐8 wk) (not pre‐specified).

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 71 High serum transferrin receptors at 6 weeks postpartum (not pre‐specified).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.71

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 71 High serum transferrin receptors at 6 weeks postpartum (not pre‐specified).

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 93 Caesarean delivery (not pre‐specified).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.93

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 93 Caesarean delivery (not pre‐specified).

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 97 Haemoglobin concentration at 4‐8 weeks postpartum (not pre‐specified).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.97

Comparison 4 Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid, Outcome 97 Haemoglobin concentration at 4‐8 weeks postpartum (not pre‐specified).

Table 1. Methodological quality assessment of included trials

Trial

Randomisation

Allocation

Blinding

Completeness of data

Quality rating

Barton 1994

Adequate

Adequate

Participants and care provider blinded

Adequate. Less than 5% lost to follow up

HIGH

Batu 1976

Unclear method

Unclear

Unclear. Participants blinded. Care provider and outcome assessor not clear

Inadequate. 28% of women lost to follow up

Butler 1968

Adequate

Adequate

Inadequate. Participant and provider were blinded for treatment for groups 1 and 2.

Inadequate. More than 20% lost to follow up

Buytaert 1983

Adequate

Adequate

Inadequate. Open

Unclear

HIGH

Cantlie 1971

Unclear. Method not stated.

Unclear

Unclear

Unclear. Not reported

Chanarin 1971

Inadequate. Quasi randomised by sequence assignment

Inadequate

Participants and care provider blinded

Adequate. Less than 20% lost to follow up

Charoenlarp 1988

Adequate

Unclear

Unclear. Participants and outcome assessor blinded. Care provider unclear

Adequate

Chew 1996a

Adequate

Adequate by sealed envelopes

Inadequate. Participants, care provider and outcome assessor not blinded

Adequate. Less than 20% lost to follow up

Chew 1996b

Adequate

Adequate by sealed envelopes

Adequate. Participants and care provider not blinded. Outcome assessor blinded

Inadequate. More than 20% lost to follow up

Chisholm 1966

Unclear method

Adequate

Participants and care provider blinded

Adequate. Less than 20% lost to follow up

Christian 2003

Adequate. Cluster randomisation

Adequate. Coded assignment

Adequate. Participants, care providers and outcome assessors blinded

Inadequate. More than 20% lost to follow up

HIGH

Cogswell 2003

Adequate

Adequate

Adequate. Participants, care provider and outcome assessor blinded

Inadequate. More than 20% lost to follow up

HIGH

De Benaze 1989

Unclear method

Adequate

Adequate. Participants and care provider blinded

Adequate. Less than 20% lost to follow up

Ekstrom 2002

Adequate by cluster

Inadequate. Not used

Inadequate. Participants and care provider not blinded. Outcome assessor unclear

Inadequate. More than 20% lost to follow up

Eskeland 1997

Adequate

Adequate

Adequate. Participants, care provider and outcome assessor blinded

Inadequate. More than 20% lost to follow up

HIGH

Hankin 1963

Inadequate. Quasi randomised by alternate assignment by day of the week

Inadequate

Inadequate. Open

Adequate. Less than 5% excluded

Harvey 2007

Adequate

Adequate. Coded opaque bottles

Inadequate. Participants blinded. Care provider and outcome assessor not blinded

Adequate. No losses to follow up.

HIGH

Hemminki 1989

Adequate

Adequate. Sealed numbered envelopes.

Inadequate. Open to participants and care providers. Outcome assessor blind.

Adequate.

HIGH

Holly 1955

Unclear method

Unclear

Inadequate. Participants and care provider not blinded. Outcome assessor unclear

Unclear

Hood 1960

Unclear method

Unclear

Inadequate. Participants and care provider not blinded. Outcome assessor unclear

Adequate. Less than 20% lost to follow up

Kerr 1958

Adequate

Unclear

Inadequate. Participants blinded. Care provider not blinded. Outcome assessor unclear

Inadequate. More than 20% lost to follow up

Lee 2005

Adequate. Method unclear

Unclear

Unclear.

Adequate. Less than 20% lost to follow up

Liu 1996

Unclear method

Adequate by sealed envelopes

Inadequate. Participants and care provider not blinded. Outcome assessor blinded

Adequate. Less than 20% lost to follow up

Makrides 2003

Adequate

Adequate

Adequate. Participants and care provider blinded

Adequate. Less than 20% lost to follow up

HIGH

Meier 2003

Adequate. Stratified by age group

Unclear

Adequate. Participants and care provider blinded. Outcome assessor unclear

Inadequate. More than 20% lost to follow up

Menendez 1994

Unclear method

Inadequate

Inadequate. Participants and care provider not blinded. Outcome assessor blinded

Inadequate. More than 20% lost to follow up

Milman 1991

Unclear method

Unclear

Adequate. Participants and care provider blinded. Outcome assessor unclear

Adequate. Less than 20% lost to follow up

Mukhopadhyay 2004

Adequate. Block randomisation

Inadequate. Not used

Inadequate. Open to participants, and care providers. Outcome assessor unclear

Inadequate. More than 20% lost to follow up

Paintin 1966

Unclear method

Adequate by sequential numbers

Adequate. Participants and care provider blinded

Adequate. Less than 5% lost to follow up

Pita Martin 1999

Inadequate. Quasi randomised

Inadequate. Not used

Inadequate. Open

Inadequate. More than 20% lost to follow up

Preziosi 1997

Adequate

Adequate

Adequate. Participant and care provider blinded. Outcome assessor blinded

Unclear

HIGH

Pritchard 1958

Unclear method

Unclear

Inadequate. Open

Unclear

Puolakka 1980

Unclear method

Unclear

Inadequate. Open

Adequate. Less than 20% lost to follow up

Ridwan 1996

Adequate

Inadequate. Not used

Inadequate. Participants and care provider not blinded. Outcome assessor blinded

Inadequate. More than 20% lost to follow up

Robinson 1998

Quasi randomised by alternate numbers

Unclear

Inadequate. Participants and care provider not blinded

Inadequate. More than 20% lost to follow up

Romslo 1983

Unclear method

Unclear

Inadequate. Participants blinded. Care provider and outcome assessor not blinded

Adequate. Less than 20% lost to follow up

Siega‐Riz 2001

Adequate. Random number generator

Adequate

Adequate. Participants, care provider and outcome assessor blinded

Inadequate. More than 20% lost to follow up

HIGH

Svanberg 1975

Unclear method

Unclear

Adequate. Participants, care provider, and outcome assessor blinded

Adequate. Less than 20% lost to follow up

Taylor 1982

Unclear method

Unclear

Inadequate. Open

Adequate. less than 20% lost to follow up

Tura 1989

Adequate

Adequate

Inadequate. Open

Adequate. Less than 20% lost to follow up

HIGH

Van Eijk 1978

Unclear. Not stated

Inadequate. Not used

Inadequate.Open

Adequate. Less than 20% loss to follow up

Wallenburg 1983

Adequate

Adequate

Inadequate.Open

Adequate. Less than 20% lost to follow up

HIGH

Willoughby 1967

Unclear method

Unclear

Unclear

A. Adequate. Less than 20% lost to follow up

Wills 1947

Inadequate. Quasi randomised by alternate allocation

Inadequate. Not used

Adequate. Participants and care provider blinded. Outcome assessor blinded

Inadequate. More than 20% lost to follow up

Winichagoon 2003

Unclear method of cluster randomisation

Inadequate. Not used

Inadequate.Open

Inadequate. more than 20% lost to follow up

Young 2000

Adequate

Unclear

Inadequate. Participants and care provider not blinded. Outcome assessor unclear

Inadequate. More than 20% lost to follow up

Yu 1998

Inadequate. Quasi randomised

Inadequate

Inadequate.Open

Inadequate. More than 20% lost to follow up

Ziaei 2008

Adequate. Random numbers table

Adequate. Coded assignments

Adequate. Participants and care provider blinded. Outcome assessor unclear

Adequate. Less than 5% lost to follow up

HIGH

Ziaei 2007

Adequate. Table of random numbers

Adequate. Coded bottles

Adequate. participants and care providers blinded. Outcome assessor unclear

Adequate. Less than 5% lost to follow up.

HIGH

Figuras y tablas -
Table 1. Methodological quality assessment of included trials
Comparison 1. Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Low birthweight (less than 2500 g) (ALL) Show forest plot

9

6275

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.79 [0.61, 1.03]

2 Low birthweight (less than 2500 g) (BY SUBGROUPS) Show forest plot

9

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

2.1 Early gestational age (less than 20 weeks of gestation or pre‐pregnancy) at start of supplementation

7

5771

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.81 [0.61, 1.08]

2.2 Late gestational age (20 weeks or more of gestation) at start of supplementation

2

504

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.55 [0.22, 1.38]

2.5 Non‐anaemic at start of supplementation

6

4452

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.76 [0.46, 1.25]

2.6 Unspecified/mixed anaemic status at start of supplementation

3

1823

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.82 [0.71, 0.94]

2.7 Daily lower dose (60 mg elemental iron or less)

7

3247

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.79 [0.53, 1.18]

2.8 Daily higher dose (more than 60 mg elemental iron)

2

3028

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.75 [0.45, 1.26]

3 Birthweight (g) (ALL) Show forest plot

10

5956

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

36.05 [‐4.84, 76.95]

4 Birthweight (g) (BY SUBGROUPS) Show forest plot

11

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

4.1 Early gestational age (less than 20 weeks of gestation or pre‐pregnancy) at start of supplementation

9

5822

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

30.89 [‐13.87, 75.65]

4.2 Late gestational age (20 weeks or more of gestation) at start of supplementation

2

251

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

39.72 [‐67.69, 147.12]

4.5 Non‐anaemic at start of supplementation

8

4496

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

29.32 [‐27.08, 85.71]

4.6 Unspecified/mixed anaemic status at start of supplementation

3

1577

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

52.33 [10.16, 94.51]

4.7 Daily low dose (60 mg elemental iron or less)

6

2804

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

37.22 [‐17.82, 92.27]

4.8 Daily higher dose (more than 60 mg elemental iron)

6

3382

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

17.99 [‐41.28, 77.26]

5 Premature delivery (less than 37 weeks of gestation) (ALL) Show forest plot

8

5730

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.85 [0.67, 1.09]

6 Premature delivery (less 37 weeks of gestation) (BY SUBGROUPS) Show forest plot

8

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

6.1 Early gestational age (less than 20 weeks of gestation or pre‐pregnancy) at start of supplementation

6

2989

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.89 [0.66, 1.20]

6.2 Late gestational age (20 weeks or more of gestation) at start of supplementation

1

47

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.32 [0.01, 7.48]

6.5 Non‐anaemic at start of supplementation

6

1775

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.78 [0.54, 1.12]

6.6 Unspecified/mixed anaemic status at start of supplementation

1

1261

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.04 [0.85, 1.28]

6.7 Daily lower dose (60 mg elemental iron or less)

6

3023

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.89 [0.68, 1.18]

6.8 Daily higher dose (more than 60 mg elemental iron)

2

2707

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.71 [0.48, 1.06]

7 Maternal Hb concentration at term (g/L) (ALL) Show forest plot

17

2463

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

8.83 [6.55, 11.11]

8 Maternal Hb concentration at term (g/L) (BY SUBGROUPS) Show forest plot

17

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

8.1 Early gestational age (less than 20 weeks of gestation or pre‐pregnancy) at start of supplementation

13

2306

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

8.14 [5.61, 10.67]

8.2 Late gestational age (20 weeks or more of gestation) at start of supplementation

3

130

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

10.24 [2.45, 18.04]

8.3 Unspecified/mixed gestational age at start of supplementation

1

27

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

14.0 [8.07, 19.93]

8.5 Non‐anaemic at start of supplementation

11

2002

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

7.77 [4.86, 10.69]

8.6 Unspecified/mixed anaemic status at start of supplementation

6

461

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

11.03 [7.51, 14.56]

8.7 Daily low dose (60 mg elemental iron or less)

8

1956

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

7.16 [4.14, 10.17]

8.8 Daily higher dose (more than 60 mg elemental iron)

9

507

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

10.94 [7.06, 14.82]

9 Anaemia at term (Hb less than 110 g/L) (ALL) Show forest plot

14

4390

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.27 [0.17, 0.42]

10 Haemoconcentration at term (Hb more than 130 g/L) (ALL) Show forest plot

10

4643

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.62 [1.21, 5.67]

11 Haemoconcentration at term (Hb more than 130 g/L) (BY SUBGROUPS) Show forest plot

10

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

11.1 Early gestational age (less than 20 weeks of gestation or pre‐pregnancy) at start of supplementation

5

4173

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.99 [0.72, 5.45]

11.2 Late gestational age (20 weeks or more of gestation) at start of supplementation

3

198

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

3.94 [0.31, 50.47]

11.3 Unspecified/mixed gestational age at start of supplementation

2

272

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

4.67 [2.53, 8.60]

11.5 Non‐anaemic at start of supplementation

5

4011

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.73 [0.64, 4.66]

11.6 Unspecified/mixed anaemic status at start of supplementation

5

632

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

4.03 [1.39, 11.72]

11.7 Daily low dose (60 mg elemental iron or less)

4

1317

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.44 [0.54, 3.86]

11.8 Daily higher dose (more than 60 mg elemental iron)

6

3326

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

3.55 [1.89, 6.66]

12 Haemoconcentration during second or third trimester (ALL) Show forest plot

10

4841

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.27 [1.40, 3.70]

13 Haemoconcentration during second or third trimester (BY SUBGROUPS) Show forest plot

10

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

13.1 Early gestational age (less than 20 weeks of gestation or pre‐pregnancy) at start of supplementation

7

4522

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.62 [1.49, 4.60]

13.2 Late gestational age (20 weeks or more of gestation) at start of supplementation

1

47

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.44 [0.72, 2.86]

13.3 Unspecified/mixed gestational age at start of supplementation

2

272

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.94 [0.30, 12.29]

13.5 Non‐anaemic at start of supplementation

6

4088

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.10 [1.13, 3.90]

13.6 Unspecified/mixed anaemic status at start of supplementation

4

753

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.67 [0.99, 7.17]

13.7 Daily low dose (60 mg elemental iron or less)

5

1655

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.35 [1.21, 4.57]

13.8 Daily higher dose (more than 60 mg elemental iron)

5

3186

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.14 [1.05, 4.37]

14 Iron deficiency at term (as defined by two or more indicators) (ALL) Show forest plot

6

1108

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.44 [0.27, 0.70]

15 Iron deficiency at term (as defined by two or more indicators) (BY SUBGROUPS) Show forest plot

6

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

15.1 Early gestational age (less than 20 weeks of gestation or pre‐pregnancy) at start of supplementation

4

867

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.56 [0.35, 0.90]

15.2 Late gestational age (20 weeks or more of gestation) at start of supplementation

2

241

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.28 [0.17, 0.44]

15.5 Non‐anaemic at start of supplementation

4

944

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.60 [0.41, 0.90]

15.6 Unspecified/mixed anaemic status at start of supplementation

2

164

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.14 [0.07, 0.29]

15.7 Daily low dose (60 mg elemental iron or less)

4

944

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.60 [0.41, 0.90]

15.8 Daily higher dose (more than 60 mg elemental iron)

2

164

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.14 [0.07, 0.29]

16 Iron deficiency anaemia at term (ALL) Show forest plot

6

1667

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.33 [0.16, 0.69]

17 Iron deficiency anaemia at term (BY SUBGROUPS) Show forest plot

6

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

17.1 Early gestational age (less than 20 weeks of gestation or pre‐pregnancy) at start of supplementation

5

1622

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.37 [0.18, 0.76]

17.2 Late gestational age (20 weeks or more of gestation) at start of supplementation

1

45

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.07 [0.00, 1.13]

17.5 Non‐anaemic at start of supplementation

5

1547

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.39 [0.20, 0.74]

17.6 Unspecified/mixed anaemic status at start of supplementation

1

120

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.04 [0.00, 0.72]

17.7 Daily low dose (60 mg elemental iron or less)

5

1547

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.39 [0.20, 0.74]

17.8 Daily higher dose (more than 60 mg elemental iron)

1

120

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.04 [0.00, 0.72]

18 Side‐effects (Any) (ALL) Show forest plot

8

3667

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

3.92 [1.21, 12.64]

19 Side‐effects (Any) (BY SUBGROUPS) Show forest plot

8

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

19.1 Early gestational age (less than 20 weeks of gestation or pre‐pregnancy) at start of supplementation

4

3034

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

3.69 [0.42, 32.71]

19.2 Late gestational age (20 weeks or more of gestation) at start of supplementation

3

428

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.75 [0.99, 3.08]

19.3 Unspecified/mixed gestational age at start of supplementation

1

205

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

62.79 [3.89, 1013.31]

19.5 Non‐anaemic at start of supplementation

4

2897

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

3.27 [0.39, 27.31]

19.6 Unspecified/mixed anaemic status at start of supplementation

4

770

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

3.94 [1.09, 14.28]

19.7 Daily low dose (60 mg elemental iron or less)

4

566

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.36 [0.99, 1.87]

19.8 Daily higher dose (more than 60 mg elemental iron)

5

3148

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

12.12 [1.76, 83.43]

20 Very low birthweight (less than 1500 g) (ALL) Show forest plot

5

2687

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.73 [0.31, 1.74]

21 Perinatal death (ALL) Show forest plot

3

5036

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.93 [0.67, 1.29]

24 Infant Hb concentration at 3 months (g/L) (ALL) Show forest plot

1

197

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [‐3.21, 3.21]

25 Infant serum ferritin concentration at 3 months (ug/L) (ALL) Show forest plot

1

197

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

19.0 [2.75, 35.25]

26 Infant Hb concentration at 6 months (g/L) (ALL) Show forest plot

2

533

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.25 [‐8.10, 5.59]

27 Infant serum ferritin concentration at 6 months (ug/L) (ALL) Show forest plot

1

197

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

11.0 [4.37, 17.63]

29 Admission to special care unit (ALL) Show forest plot

2

2805

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.95 [0.73, 1.23]

30 Very premature delivery (less than 34 weeks' gestation) (ALL) Show forest plot

4

1417

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.44 [0.16, 1.24]

31 Severe anaemia at term (Hb less than 70 g/L) (ALL) Show forest plot

8

1751

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

4.83 [0.23, 99.88]

32 Moderate anaemia at term (Hb more than 70 g/L and less than 90 g/L) (ALL) Show forest plot

9

1868

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.94 [0.55, 1.62]

33 Severe anaemia at any time during second and third trimester (ALL) Show forest plot

9

2089

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.48 [0.01, 34.52]

34 Moderate anaemia at any time during second or third trimester (ALL) Show forest plot

10

2266

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.42 [0.19, 0.92]

35 Infection during pregnancy (including urinary tract infections) (ALL) Show forest plot

2

3421

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.16 [0.83, 1.63]

36 Puerperal infection (ALL) Show forest plot

2

2169

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.72 [0.25, 2.10]

37 Antepartum haemorraghe (ALL) Show forest plot

2

1157

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.48 [0.51, 4.31]

38 Postpartum haemorraghe (ALL) Show forest plot

5

1554

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.95 [0.51, 1.78]

39 Transfusion provided (ALL) Show forest plot

3

3453

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.61 [0.38, 0.96]

40 Haemoglobin concentration within one month postpartum (ALL) Show forest plot

6

904

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

7.08 [4.70, 9.47]

41 Severe anaemia at postpartum (Hb less than 80 g/L) (ALL) Show forest plot

7

1094

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.06 [0.00, 1.05]

42 Moderate anaemia at postpartum (Hb more than 80 g/L and less than 100 g/L) (ALL) Show forest plot

4

831

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.55 [0.12, 2.51]

43 Diarrhoea (ALL) Show forest plot

3

1088

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.55 [0.32, 0.93]

44 Constipation (ALL) Show forest plot

4

1495

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.95 [0.62, 1.43]

45 Nausea (ALL) Show forest plot

4

1377

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.21 [0.72, 2.03]

46 Heartburn (ALL) Show forest plot

3

1323

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.19 [0.86, 1.66]

47 Vomiting (ALL) Show forest plot

4

1392

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.88 [0.59, 1.30]

48 Maternal death (death while pregnant or within 42 days of termination of pregnancy) (ALL) Show forest plot

1

47

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

49 Maternal wellbeing/satisfaction (ALL) Show forest plot

2

2604

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.00 [0.91, 1.09]

50 Placental abruption (ALL) Show forest plot

2

2169

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.14 [0.32, 4.06]

51 Premature rupture of membranes (ALL) Show forest plot

1

727

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.99 [0.74, 1.34]

52 Pre‐eclampsia (ALL) Show forest plot

2

774

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.58 [0.81, 8.22]

91 Small for gestational age (less than 10th percentile weight at birth for gestational age) (not pre‐specified) Show forest plot

4

2511

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.87 [0.58, 1.30]

93 Cesarean delivery (not pre‐specified) Show forest plot

7

4283

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.94 [0.78, 1.13]

94 Birth length in cm (not pre‐specified) Show forest plot

5

2140

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.38 [0.10, 0.65]

95 Forceps or vacuum delivery (not pre‐specified) Show forest plot

2

477

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.50 [0.94, 2.40]

96 Breastfeeding at least 4 months (not pre‐specified) Show forest plot

1

48

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.00 [0.89, 1.13]

97 Haemoglobin concentration at 4‐8 weeks' postpartum (g/L) (not pre‐specified) Show forest plot

10

1188

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

5.13 [0.24, 10.02]

98 Apgar score < 7 at 5 minutes (not pre‐specified) Show forest plot

2

475

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.74 [0.17, 3.28]

99 Apgar Score at 5 min (not pre‐specified) Show forest plot

2

228

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.27 [‐0.07, 0.62]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Daily iron alone versus no intervention/placebo
Comparison 2. Intermittent iron alone versus daily iron alone

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

3 Birthweight (ALL) Show forest plot

1

41

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐68.0 [‐398.33, 262.33]

5 Premature delivery (less than 37 weeks of gestation) (ALL) Show forest plot

1

41

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.46 [0.02, 8.96]

12 Haemoconcentration during second or third trimester (Hb more than 130 g/L) (ALL) Show forest plot

2

64

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.54 [0.18, 1.58]

33 Severe anaemia at any time during second and third trimester (Hb less than 70 g/L) (ALL) Show forest plot

2

64

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

34 Moderate anaemia at any time during second or third trimester (ALL) Show forest plot

2

64

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.42 [0.16, 35.56]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 2. Intermittent iron alone versus daily iron alone
Comparison 3. Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Low birthweight (less than 2500 g) (ALL) Show forest plot

2

1368

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.06 [0.28, 4.02]

2 Low birthweight (less than 2500 g) (BY SUBGROUPS) Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

2.1 Early gestational age (less than 20 weeks of gestation or pre‐pregnancy) at start of supplementation

2

1368

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.06 [0.28, 4.02]

2.6 Unspecified/mixed anaemic status at start of supplementation

2

1368

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.06 [0.28, 4.02]

2.7 Daily low dose (60 mg elemental iron or less)

1

1320

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.79 [0.69, 0.91]

2.8 Daily higher dose (more than 60 mg elemental iron)

1

48

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

5.0 [0.25, 98.96]

3 Birthweight (ALL) Show forest plot

2

1365

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

57.73 [7.66, 107.79]

4 Birthweight (BY SUBGROUPS) Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

4.1 Early gestational age (less than 20 weeks of gestation or pre‐pregnancy) at start of supplementation

2

1365

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

57.73 [7.66, 107.79]

4.6 Unspecified/mixed anaemic status at start of supplementation

2

1365

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

57.73 [7.66, 107.79]

4.7 Daily low dose (60 mg elemental iron or less)

1

1320

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

65.0 [17.46, 112.54]

4.8 Daily higher dose (more than 60 mg elemental iron)

1

45

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐32.0 [‐213.62, 149.62]

5 Premature delivery (less than 37 weeks of gestation) (ALL) Show forest plot

3

1497

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.55 [0.40, 6.00]

6 Premature delivery (less than 37 weeks of gestation) (BY SUB GROUPS) Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

6.1 Early gestational age (less than 20 weeks of gestation or pre‐pregnancy) at start of supplementation

2

1362

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.13 [0.92, 1.39]

6.2 Late gestational age (20 weeks or more of gestation) at start of supplementation

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.6 Unspecified/mixed anaemic status at start of supplementation

2

1449

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.13 [0.92, 1.39]

6.7 Daily low dose (60 mg elemental iron or less)

2

1449

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.13 [0.92, 1.39]

7 Haemoglobin concentration at term (ALL) Show forest plot

4

179

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

12.00 [2.93, 21.07]

8 Haemoglobin concentration at term (BY SUBGROUPS) Show forest plot

4

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

8.1 Early gestational age (less than 20 weeks of gestation or pre‐pregnancy) at start of supplementation

2

93

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

15.65 [11.84, 19.46]

8.2 Late gestational age (20 weeks or more of gestation) at start of supplementation

2

86

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

7.92 [‐11.68, 27.52]

8.5 Non‐anaemic at start of supplementation

1

48

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

17.10 [8.44, 25.76]

8.6 Unspecified/mixed anaemic status at start of supplementation

3

131

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

10.47 [‐1.07, 22.00]

8.7 Daily low dose (60 mg elemental iron or less)

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8.8 Daily higher dose (more than 60 mg elemental iron)

4

179

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

12.00 [2.93, 21.07]

9 Anaemia at term (Hb less than 110 g/L) (ALL) Show forest plot

3

346

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.27 [0.12, 0.56]

10 Haemoconcentration at term (Hb more than 130 g/L) (ALL) Show forest plot

3

353

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.74 [0.34, 8.94]

11 Haemoconcentration at term (Hb more than 130 g/L) (BY SUBGROUPS) Show forest plot

3

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

11.1 Early gestational age (less than 20 weeks of gestation or pre‐pregnancy) at start of supplementation

1

75

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

3.37 [0.19, 60.03]

11.2 Late gestational age (20 weeks or more of gestation) at start of supplementation

3

298

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.97 [0.32, 12.08]

11.6 Unspecified/mixed anaemic status at start of supplementation

1

131

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

4.31 [0.26, 70.41]

11.7 Daily low dose (60 mg elemental iron or less)

1

131

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

4.31 [0.26, 70.41]

11.8 Daily higher dose (more than 60 mg elemental iron)

2

222

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.28 [0.24, 6.78]

12 Haemoconcentration during second or third trimester (ALL) Show forest plot

2

446

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.78 [0.63, 5.04]

13 Haemoconcentration during second or third trimester (BY SUBGROUPS) Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

13.1 Early gestational age (less than 20 weeks of gestation or pre‐pregnancy) at start of supplementation

2

390

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.45 [0.33, 6.32]

13.2 Late gestational age (20 weeks or more of gestation) at start of supplementation

1

76

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.34 [0.50, 3.56]

13.3 Unspecified/mixed gestational age at start of supplementation

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

13.5 Non‐anaemic at start of supplementation

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

13.6 Unspecified/mixed anaemic status at start of supplementation

2

446

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.78 [0.63, 5.04]

13.7 Daily low dose (60 mg elemental iron or less)

2

446

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.78 [0.63, 5.04]

13.8 Daily higher dose (more than 60 mg elemental iron)

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

14 Iron deficiency at term (as defined by two or more indicators) (ALL) Show forest plot

1

131

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.24 [0.06, 0.99]

15 Iron deficiency at term (as defined by two or more indicators) (BY SUBGROUPS) Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

15.1 Early gestational age (less than 20 weeks of gestation or pre‐pregnancy) at start of supplementation

1

75

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.12 [0.01, 1.10]

15.2 Late gestational age (20 weeks or more of gestation) at start of supplementation

1

76

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.36 [0.08, 1.63]

15.5 Non‐anaemic at start of supplementation

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15.6 Unspecified/mixed anaemic status at start of supplementation

1

131

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.24 [0.06, 0.99]

15.7 Daily low dose (60 mg elemental iron or less)

1

131

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.24 [0.06, 0.99]

15.8 Daily higher dose (more than 60 mg elemental iron)

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16 Iron deficiency anaemia at term (ALL) Show forest plot

1

131

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.43 [0.17, 1.09]

17 Iron deficiency anaemia at term (BY SUBGROUPS) Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

17.1 Early gestational age (less than 20 weeks of gestation or pre‐pregnancy) at start of supplementation

1

75

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.36 [0.12, 1.12]

17.2 Late gestational age (20 weeks or more of gestation) at start of supplementation

1

76

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.5 [0.18, 1.40]

17.5 Non‐anaemic at start of supplementation

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

17.6 Unspecified/mixed anaemic status at start of supplementation

1

131

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.43 [0.17, 1.09]

17.7 Daily low dose (60 mg elemental iron or less)

1

131

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.43 [0.17, 1.09]

17.8 Daily higher dose (more than 60 mg elemental iron)

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

18 Side effects (Any) (ALL) Show forest plot

1

456

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

44.32 [2.77, 709.09]

20 Very low birthweight (less than 1500 g) (ALL) Show forest plot

1

48

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

5.0 [0.25, 98.96]

21 Perinatal death (ALL) Show forest plot

3

1862

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.83 [0.58, 1.17]

29 Admission to special care unit (ALL) Show forest plot

1

48

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

30 Very premature delivery (less than 34 weeks' gestation) (ALL) Show forest plot

2

92

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

5.0 [0.25, 98.96]

31 Severe anaemia at term (Hb less than 70 g/L) (ALL) Show forest plot

3

180

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

32 Moderate anaemia at term (Hb more than 70g/L and less than 90 g/L) (ALL) Show forest plot

3

180

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

33 Severe anaemia at any time during second and third trimester (Hb less than 70 g/L) (ALL) Show forest plot

4

523

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.11 [0.01, 0.83]

34 Moderate anaemia at any time during second or third trimester (ALL) Show forest plot

4

523

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.34 [0.11, 1.04]

35 Infection during pregnancy (including urinary tract infections) (ALL) Show forest plot

1

48

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.0 [0.15, 6.53]

36 Puerperal infection (ALL) Show forest plot

1

2863

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.55 [0.13, 2.28]

37 Antepartum haemorrhage (ALL) Show forest plot

2

145

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.25 [0.22, 7.12]

38 Postpartum haemorrhage (ALL) Show forest plot

1

68

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.12 [0.00, 2.71]

40 Haemoglobin concentration within one month postpartum (ALL) Show forest plot

1

45

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

10.40 [4.03, 16.77]

41 Severe anaemia at postpartum (Hb less than 80 g/L) (ALL) Show forest plot

3

525

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.05 [0.00, 0.76]

42 Moderate anaemia at postpartum (Hb more than 80 g/L and less than 100 g/L) (ALL) Show forest plot

3

525

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.34 [0.17, 0.69]

48 Maternal death (death while pregnant or within 42 days of termination of pregnancy) (ALL) Show forest plot

1

131

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

50 Placental abruption (ALL) Show forest plot

1

2863

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

8.19 [0.49, 138.16]

52 Pre‐eclampsia (ALL) Show forest plot

1

48

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

3.00 [0.13, 70.16]

91 Small for gestational age (less than 10th percentile weight at birth for gestational age) (not pre‐specified) Show forest plot

1

1318

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.88 [0.80, 0.97]

92 Oedema during pregnancy (not pre‐specified) Show forest plot

1

67

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.82 [0.99, 8.09]

93 Caesarean delivery (not pre‐specified) Show forest plot

1

97

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.83 [0.22, 3.13]

94 Birth length in cm (not pre‐specified) Show forest plot

1

1320

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.20 [‐0.06, 0.46]

97 Haemoglobin concentration at 4‐8 weeks postpartum (not prespecified) Show forest plot

3

526

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

4.88 [‐0.85, 10.62]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 3. Daily iron‐folic acid versus no intervention/placebo
Comparison 4. Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Low birthweight (less than 2500 g) (ALL) Show forest plot

4

730

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.05 [0.58, 1.91]

2 Low birthweight (less than 2500 g) (BY SUBGROUPS) Show forest plot

4

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

2.1 Early gestational age (less than 20 weeks of gestation or pre‐pregnancy) at start of supplementation

2

455

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.29 [0.55, 3.01]

2.3 Unspecified/mixed gestational age at start of supplementation

2

275

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.85 [0.36, 1.99]

2.5 Non‐anaemic at start of supplementation

1

80

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.25 [0.36, 4.32]

2.7 Daily low dose (60 mg elemental iron or less)

3

650

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.99 [0.50, 1.97]

2.8 Daily higher dose (more than 60 mg elemental iron)

1

80

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.25 [0.36, 4.32]

3 Birthweight (ALL) Show forest plot

4

730

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐7.10 [‐67.20, 53.01]

4 Birthweight (BY SUBGROUPS) Show forest plot

4

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

4.1 Early gestational age (less than 20 weeks of gestation or pre‐pregnancy) at start of supplementation

2

455

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.19 [‐70.50, 72.87]

4.3 Unspecified/mixed gestational age at start of supplementation

2

275

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐26.71 [‐137.00, 83.58]

4.5 Non‐anaemic at start of supplementation

1

80

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [‐154.95, 154.95]

4.7 Daily low dose (60 mg elemental iron or less)

3

650

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐8.36 [‐73.56, 56.85]

4.8 Daily higher dose (more than 60 mg elemental iron)

1

80

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [‐154.95, 154.95]

5 Premature delivery (less than 37 weeks of gestation) (ALL) Show forest plot

1

80

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.0 [0.39, 10.31]

7 Haemoglobin concentration at term (ALL) Show forest plot

3

475

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.83 [‐4.74, 3.08]

8 Haemoglobin concentration at term (BY SUBGROUPS) Show forest plot

3

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

8.3 Unspecified/mixed gestational age at start of supplementation

2

301

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐2.19 [‐6.85, 2.47]

8.7 Daily low dose (60 mg elemental iron or less)

3

422

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.10 [‐5.15, 4.95]

8.8 Daily higher dose (more than 60 mg elemental iron)

1

109

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.82 [‐4.99, 3.35]

9 Anaemia at term (Hb < 110 g/L) (ALL) Show forest plot

3

475

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.20 [0.78, 1.83]

10 Haemoconcentration at term (Hb more than 130 g/L) (ALL) Show forest plot

3

475

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.93 [0.47, 1.82]

11 Haemoconcentration at term (Hb more than 130 g/L) (BY SUBGROUPS) Show forest plot

3

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

11.7 Daily low dose (60 mg elemental iron or less)

3

422

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.24 [0.42, 3.66]

11.8 Daily higher dose (more than 60 mg elemental iron)

1

109

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.63 [0.19, 2.11]

12 Haemoconcentration during second or third trimester (Hb more than 130 g/L) (ALL) Show forest plot

6

1111

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.43 [0.24, 0.77]

13 Haemoconcentration during second or third trimester (Hb more than 130 g/L) (BY SUBGROUPS) Show forest plot

6

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

13.1 Early gestational age (less than 20 weeks of gestation or pre‐pregnancy) at start of supplementation

2

250

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.52 [0.26, 1.01]

13.2 Late gestational age (20 weeks or more of gestation) at start of supplementation

1

166

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.24 [0.10, 0.55]

13.3 Unspecified/mixed gestational age at start of supplementation

3

695

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.46 [0.13, 1.65]

13.4 Anaemic at start of supplementation (Hb <110 g/L if in first or <105 g/L if in second trimester)

1

47

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

13.5 Non‐anaemic at start of supplementation

1

80

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.6 [0.15, 2.34]

13.6 Unspecified/mixed anaemic status at start of supplementation

4

966

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.41 [0.21, 0.80]

13.7 Daily low dose (60 mg elemental iron or less)

5

953

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.41 [0.20, 0.82]

13.8 Daily higher dose (more than 60 mg elemental iron)

2

247

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.74 [0.42, 1.31]

16 Iron deficiency anaemia at term (based on two or more indicators) (ALL) Show forest plot

1

156

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.71 [0.08, 6.63]

18 Side effects (any) (ALL) Show forest plot

7

1307

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.69 [0.45, 1.04]

19 Side effects (any) (BY SUBGROUPS) Show forest plot

7

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

19.1 Early gestational age (less than 20 weeks or pre‐pregnancy) at start of supplementation

1

80

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.2 [0.08, 0.53]

19.2 Late gestational age (20 weeks or more of gestation) at start of supplementation

1

172

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.0 [0.79, 1.27]

19.3 Unspecified/mixed gestational age at start of supplementation

5

1055

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.72 [0.42, 1.26]

19.4 Non‐anaemic at start of supplementation

1

80

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.2 [0.08, 0.53]

19.7 Daily low dose (60 mg elemental iron or less)

6

1171

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.92 [0.71, 1.19]

19.8 Daily higher dose (more than 60 mg elemental iron)

2

253

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.14 [0.07, 0.25]

20 Very low birthweight (less than 1500 g) (ALL) Show forest plot

4

737

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

21 Perinatal death (ALL) Show forest plot

1

80

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

27 Infant ferritin concentration at 6 months (ug/L) (ALL) Show forest plot

1

88

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.09 [0.05, 0.13]

30 Very premature delivery (less than 34 weeks of gestation) (ALL) Show forest plot

1

111

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.98 [0.06, 15.31]

31 Severe anaemia at term (Hb less than 70 g/L) (ALL) Show forest plot

4

555

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

32 Moderate anaemia at term (Hb more than 70g/L and less than 90 g/L) (ALL) Show forest plot

3

475

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.03 [0.07, 16.23]

33 Severe anaemia at any time during second and third trimester (Hb less than 70 g/L) (ALL) Show forest plot

6

1240

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

34 Moderate anaemia at any time during second or third trimester (ALL) Show forest plot

6

1111

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.54 [0.63, 10.17]

37 Antepartum haemorraghe (ALL) Show forest plot

1

110

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.0 [0.06, 15.59]

41 Severe anaemia at postpartum (Hb less than 80 g/L) (ALL) Show forest plot

1

169

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.43 [0.04, 4.64]

42 Moderate anaemia at postpartum (Hb more than 80 g/L and less than 100 g/L) (ALL) Show forest plot

1

169

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.14 [0.26, 4.95]

43 Diarrhoea (ALL) Show forest plot

4

553

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.94 [0.38, 2.34]

44 Constipation (ALL) Show forest plot

4

553

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.99 [0.48, 2.06]

45 Nausea (ALL) Show forest plot

5

854

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.59 [0.30, 1.16]

46 Heartburn (ALL) Show forest plot

3

473

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.78 [0.29, 2.06]

47 Vomiting (ALL) Show forest plot

5

854

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.44 [0.82, 2.53]

50 Placental abruption (ALL) Show forest plot

1

110

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.33 [0.01, 8.01]

51 Premature rupture of membranes (ALL) Show forest plot

1

80

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.33 [0.01, 7.95]

68 Ln (serum ferritin concentration) 4‐8 wk postpartum (not pre‐specified) Show forest plot

1

160

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.13 [‐0.42, 0.16]

70 Low serum ferritin concentration at postpartum (4‐8 wk) (not pre‐specified) Show forest plot

1

146

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.19 [0.40, 3.57]

71 High serum transferrin receptors at 6 weeks postpartum (not pre‐specified) Show forest plot

1

146

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.69 [0.36, 1.33]

93 Caesarean delivery (not pre‐specified) Show forest plot

1

80

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.89 [0.38, 2.07]

97 Haemoglobin concentration at 4‐8 weeks postpartum (not pre‐specified) Show forest plot

1

146

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

2.0 [‐3.86, 7.86]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 4. Intermittent iron‐folic acid versus daily iron‐folic acid