Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Memantin za demenciju

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003154.pub5Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 19 abril 2006see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Demencia y trastornos cognitivos

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2009 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

Contributions of authors

‐AAS: drafting of earlier review versions, search for trials, obtaining copies of trial reports, selection of trials for inclusion/exclusion; extraction of data, entry of data, interpretation of data analysis
‐RM: drafting of review version, identification of trials, obtaining copies of trial reports, extraction of data, entry of data, data analysis, interpretation
‐NM: search for trials, extracted data, data entry, data analysis

‐Jacqueline Birks assisted in the selection of trials for inclusion and exclusion and checked the analyses
‐Dymphna Hermans : performed the searches
‐Contact editor: Lon Schneider
‐Consumer editor: Corinne Cavender

The first version of this review was peer reviewed anonymously
The April 05 update of this review was peer reviewed

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • Cochrane Dementia & Cognitive Improvement Group, UK.

External sources

  • Alzheimer's Society, UK.

Declarations of interest

disponible en

There is no known conflict of interest. RM won a randomly selected prize worth less than £500 for attending two consecutive early morning sessions sponsored by Merz and Lundbeck at the Stockholm 2005 IPA meeting.

Acknowledgements

disponible en

We thank Corinne Cavender for her contributions as Consumer Editor.
We thank Merz for providing an unpublished breakdown of global ratings of change and NOSGER scores from 9202/Wilcock 2002.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2019 Mar 20

Memantine for dementia

Review

Rupert McShane, Maggie J Westby, Emmert Roberts, Neda Minakaran, Lon Schneider, Lucy E Farrimond, Nicola Maayan, Jennifer Ware, Jean Debarros

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003154.pub6

2006 Apr 19

Memantine for dementia

Review

Rupert McShane, Almudena Areosa Sastre, Neda Minakaran

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003154.pub5

2005 Jul 20

Memantine for dementia

Review

Almudena Areosa Sastre, Fiona Sherriff, Rupert McShane

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003154.pub3

2005 Jul 20

Memantine for dementia

Review

Almudena Areosa Sastre, Fiona Sherriff, Rupert McShane

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003154.pub4

2004 Oct 18

Memantine for dementia

Review

Almudena Areosa Sastre, Fiona Sherriff

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003154.pub2

2003 Jul 21

Memantine for dementia

Review

Almudena Areosa Sastre, Fiona Sherriff

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003154

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.