Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Memantine for dementia

This is not the most recent version

Information

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003154.pub5Copy DOI
Database:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Version published:
  1. 19 April 2006see what's new
Type:
  1. Intervention
Stage:
  1. Review
Cochrane Editorial Group:
  1. Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2009 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Article metrics

Altmetric:

Cited by:

Cited 0 times via Crossref Cited-by Linking

Collapse

Authors

Contributions of authors

‐AAS: drafting of earlier review versions, search for trials, obtaining copies of trial reports, selection of trials for inclusion/exclusion; extraction of data, entry of data, interpretation of data analysis
‐RM: drafting of review version, identification of trials, obtaining copies of trial reports, extraction of data, entry of data, data analysis, interpretation
‐NM: search for trials, extracted data, data entry, data analysis

‐Jacqueline Birks assisted in the selection of trials for inclusion and exclusion and checked the analyses
‐Dymphna Hermans : performed the searches
‐Contact editor: Lon Schneider
‐Consumer editor: Corinne Cavender

The first version of this review was peer reviewed anonymously
The April 05 update of this review was peer reviewed

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • Cochrane Dementia & Cognitive Improvement Group, UK.

External sources

  • Alzheimer's Society, UK.

Declarations of interest

available in

There is no known conflict of interest. RM won a randomly selected prize worth less than £500 for attending two consecutive early morning sessions sponsored by Merz and Lundbeck at the Stockholm 2005 IPA meeting.

Acknowledgements

available in

We thank Corinne Cavender for her contributions as Consumer Editor.
We thank Merz for providing an unpublished breakdown of global ratings of change and NOSGER scores from 9202/Wilcock 2002.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2019 Mar 20

Memantine for dementia

Review

Rupert McShane, Maggie J Westby, Emmert Roberts, Neda Minakaran, Lon Schneider, Lucy E Farrimond, Nicola Maayan, Jennifer Ware, Jean Debarros

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003154.pub6

2006 Apr 19

Memantine for dementia

Review

Rupert McShane, Almudena Areosa Sastre, Neda Minakaran

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003154.pub5

2005 Jul 20

Memantine for dementia

Review

Almudena Areosa Sastre, Fiona Sherriff, Rupert McShane

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003154.pub3

2005 Jul 20

Memantine for dementia

Review

Almudena Areosa Sastre, Fiona Sherriff, Rupert McShane

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003154.pub4

2004 Oct 18

Memantine for dementia

Review

Almudena Areosa Sastre, Fiona Sherriff

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003154.pub2

2003 Jul 21

Memantine for dementia

Review

Almudena Areosa Sastre, Fiona Sherriff

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003154

PICOs

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

The PICO model is widely used and taught in evidence-based health care as a strategy for formulating questions and search strategies and for characterizing clinical studies or meta-analyses. PICO stands for four different potential components of a clinical question: Patient, Population or Problem; Intervention; Comparison; Outcome.

See more on using PICO in the Cochrane Handbook.