Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Altering the availability or proximity of food, alcohol and tobacco products to change their selection and consumption

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012573Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 01 marzo 2017see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Protocol
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Salud pública

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2017 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Gareth J Hollands

    Correspondencia a: Behaviour and Health Research Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

    [email protected]

  • Patrice Carter

    Behaviour and Health Research Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

  • Ian Shemilt

    EPPI‐Centre, University College London, London, UK

  • Theresa M Marteau

    Behaviour and Health Research Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

  • Susan A Jebb

    Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

  • Julian Higgins

    School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK

  • David Ogilvie

    MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

Contributions of authors

Draft the protocol ‐ all authors
Develop a search strategy ‐ GJH, IS
Search for trials ‐ GJH, PC, IS
Obtain copies of trials ‐ GJH, PC, IS
Select which studies to include ‐ GJH, PC, IS, DO
Extract data from studies ‐ GJH, PC
Enter data into RevMan ‐ GJH, PC
Carry out the analysis ‐ JPTH, GJH, PC
Interpret the analysis ‐ all authors
Draft the final review ‐ all authors

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • Kings College London, UK.

    Database access

  • University of Cambridge, UK.

    Computer provision, database access

  • University of Bristol, UK.

    Computer provision

  • University College London, UK.

    Computer provision

External sources

  • Department of Health Policy Research Programme in England ([PR‐UN‐0409‐10109] Policy Research Unit in Behaviour and Health), UK.

    Funding for the protocol

Declarations of interest

Gareth Hollands declares no financial or other conflicts of interest.

Patrice Carter declares no financial or other conflicts of interest.

Ian Shemilt declares no financial or other conflicts of interest.

Theresa Marteau declares no financial or other conflicts of interest.

Susan Jebb has received funding from Tanita Ltd (ended Jan 2015), a manufacturer of medical equipment. This funding does not present a conflict with the review topic.

Julian Higgins declares no financial or other conflicts of interest.

David Ogilvie declares no financial or other conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgements

Production of this protocol was funded by the Department of Health Policy Research Programme in England ([PR‐UN‐0409‐10109] Policy Research Unit in Behaviour and Health). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Department of Health in England. We would like to acknowledge the contributions of Julie Glanville (York Health Economics Consortium, University of York, UK) who reviewed a draft of our MEDLINE search strategy, Claire Stansfield (EPPI‐Centre, UCL Institute of Education, UK) who helped to develop our search strategy for the TRoPHI database, and Patrick Condron (Information Specialist, Cochrane Public Health Group) who reviewed further iterations of our MEDLINE and Embase strategies. We would like to thank Jessie Porter, Rebecca Armstrong, Patrick Condron, Jodie Doyle (Managing Editor), and their colleagues in the Cochrane Public Health Group as well as Maureen Dobbins, Anke Rohwer, Sree Nair, Sadequa Shahrook and other external referees who provided helpful comments on this protocol. We would like to thank colleagues at the EPPI‐Centre, UCL Institute of Education, UK, in particular James Thomas and Sergio Graziosi, for their help in developing technological solutions and managing those processes in order to implement a workable study identification process.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2019 Sep 04

Altering the availability or proximity of food, alcohol, and tobacco products to change their selection and consumption

Review

Gareth J Hollands, Patrice Carter, Sumayya Anwer, Sarah E King, Susan A Jebb, David Ogilvie, Ian Shemilt, Julian P T Higgins, Theresa M Marteau

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012573.pub3

2019 Aug 27

Altering the availability or proximity of food, alcohol, and tobacco products to change their selection and consumption

Review

Gareth J Hollands, Patrice Carter, Sumayya Anwer, Sarah E King, Susan A Jebb, David Ogilvie, Ian Shemilt, Julian P T Higgins, Theresa M Marteau

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012573.pub2

2017 Mar 01

Altering the availability or proximity of food, alcohol and tobacco products to change their selection and consumption

Protocol

Gareth J Hollands, Patrice Carter, Ian Shemilt, Theresa M Marteau, Susan A Jebb, Julian Higgins, David Ogilvie

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012573

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.

Design‐oriented conceptual model
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Design‐oriented conceptual model