Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Macrolides for treatment of Haemophilus ducreyi infection in sexually‐active adults

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012492Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 10 enero 2017see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Protocol
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Enfermedades de transmisión sexual

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2017 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Cesar Huerfano

    Correspondencia a: Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogota, Colombia

    [email protected]

  • Carlos F Grillo‐Ardila

    Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogota, Colombia

    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogota, Colombia

  • Laura Romero

    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogota, Colombia

  • Hernando G Gaitán

    Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogota, Colombia

    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogota, Colombia

  • Ariel I Ruiz‐Parra

    Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogota, Colombia

    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogota, Colombia

Contributions of authors

CH conceived the review and wrote the first draft of the protocol, and provided a methodological perspective.
CFG‐A wrote the first draft of the protocol, commented on and revised the first draft, and provided a methodological and a clinical perspective.
LR contributed to writing, commented on and revised the first draft of the protocol, and provided a clinical perspective.
AIR‐P and HGG commented on and revised the first draft of the protocol, and provided a methodological and clinical perspective.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • No sources of support supplied

External sources

  • National University of Colombia, Colombia.

Declarations of interest

None known. None of the review authors have been involved in studies that might potentially meet the inclusion criteria of this Cochrane review.

Acknowledgements

As part of the editorial process, three peer reviewers (thematic expert, methodologist and statistician) and a consumer referee commented on the draft.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2017 Dec 11

Macrolides for treatment of <i>Haemophilus ducreyi</i> infection in sexually active adults

Review

Laura Romero, Cesar Huerfano, Carlos F Grillo‐Ardila

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012492.pub2

2017 Jan 10

Macrolides for treatment of <i>Haemophilus ducreyi</i> infection in sexually‐active adults

Protocol

Cesar Huerfano, Carlos F Grillo‐Ardila, Laura Romero, Hernando G Gaitán, Ariel I Ruiz‐Parra

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012492

Keywords

MeSH

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.