Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Diferentes tipos de corticosteroides intranasales para la rinosinusitis crónica

Appendices

Appendix 1. Search strategies

CENTRAL

Ovid MEDLINE

#1 MeSH descriptor: [Sinusitis] explode all trees

#2 MeSH descriptor: [Rhinitis] this term only

#3 MeSH descriptor: [Rhinitis, Atrophic] this term only

#4 MeSH descriptor: [Rhinitis, Vasomotor] this term only

#5 MeSH descriptor: [Paranasal Sinus Diseases] this term only

#6 MeSH descriptor: [Paranasal Sinuses] explode all trees

#7 rhinosinusitis or nasosinusitis or pansinusitis or ethmoiditis or sphenoiditis

#8 kartagener* near syndrome*

#9 inflamm* near sinus*

#10 (maxilla* or frontal*) near sinus*

#11 #1 or #2 or #3 or #4 or #5 or #6 or #7 or #8 or #9 or #10

#12 MeSH descriptor: [Chronic Disease] explode all trees

#13 MeSH descriptor: [Recurrence] explode all trees

#14 chronic or persis* or recurrent*

#15 #12 or #13 or #14

#16 #11 and #15

#17 CRSsNP

#18 (sinusitis or rhinitis) near (chronic or persis* or recurrent*)

#19 #16 or #17 or #18

#20 MeSH descriptor: [Nasal Polyps] explode all trees

#21 MeSH descriptor: [Nose] explode all trees

#22 MeSH descriptor: [Nose Diseases] explode all trees

#23 #21 or #22

#24 MeSH descriptor: [Polyps] explode all trees

#25 #23 and #24

#26 (nose or nasal or rhino* or rhinitis or sinus* or sinonasal) near (papilloma* or polyp*)

#27 rhinopolyp* or CRSwNP

#28 #19 or #20 or #25 or #26 or #27

#29 MeSH descriptor: [Steroids] explode all trees

#30 MeSH descriptor: [Adrenal Cortex Hormones] explode all trees

#31 MeSH descriptor: [Glucocorticoids] explode all trees

#32 MeSH descriptor: [Anti‐Inflammatory Agents] explode all trees

#33 MeSH descriptor: [Anti‐Inflammatory Agents, Non‐Steroidal] explode all trees

#34 #32 not #33

#35 steroid* or glucocorticoid* or corticosteroid* or glucosteroid* or cyclocosteroid*

#36 beclomethasone or beclometasone or beclamet or beclocort or becotide

#37 betamethasone or betadexamethasone or flubenisolone or celeston* or cellestoderm or betnelan or oradexon

#38 dexamethasoneor dexameth or dexone or dexametasone or decadron or dexasone or hexadecadron or hexadrol or methylfluorprednisolone or millicorten

#39 flunisolide or fluticasone or hydrocortisone or cortisol or cortifair or cortril or hyrocortone or cortef or epicortisol or efcortesol or Cortisone

#40 methylprednisolone or medrol or metripred or urbason

#41 mometasone or prednisolone or precortisyl or deltacortril or deltastab or prednesol or deltasone or prednisone or cortan or liquid next pred or meticorten

#42 paramethasone or triamcinolone or aristocort or volon or atolone or kenacort or orasone or panasol or prednicen

#43 corticoid* or betamethason* or betamethasone or hydrocortison* or celesto* or dexamethason* or hexadecadrol or budesonid* or horacort or pulmicort or rhinocort or methylfluorprednisolone or flunisolid* or nasalide or fluticason* or flonase or flounce or mometason* or nasonex or triamclinolon* or nasacort or tri next nasal or aristocort or Ciclesonide

#44 #29 or #30 or #31 or #34 or #35 or #36 or #37 or #38 or #39 or #40 or #41 or #42 or #43

#45 #28 and #44

1 exp Sinusitis/

2 paranasal sinus diseases/ or rhinitis/ or rhinitis, atrophic/ or rhinitis, vasomotor/

3 exp Paranasal Sinuses/

4 (rhinosinusitis or nasosinusitis or pansinusitis or ethmoiditis or sphenoiditis).ab,ti.

5 (kartagener* adj3 syndrome*).ab,ti.

6 (inflamm* adj5 sinus*).ab,ti.

7 ((maxilla* or frontal*) adj3 sinus*).ab,ti.

8 1 or 2 or 3 or 4 or 5 or 6 or 7

9 exp chronic disease/

10 exp Recurrence/

11 (chronic or persis* or recurrent*).ab,ti.

12 9 or 10 or 11

13 8 and 12

14 CRSsNP.ab,ti.

15 ((sinusitis or rhinitis) adj3 (chronic or persis* or recurrent*)).ab,ti.

16 13 or 14 or 15

17 exp Nasal Polyps/

18 exp Nose/ or exp Nose Diseases/

19 exp Polyps/

20 18 and 19

21 ((nose or nasal or rhino* or rhinitis or sinus* or sinonasal) adj3 (papilloma* or polyp*)).ab,ti.

22 (rhinopolyp* or CRSwNP).ab,ti.

23 16 or 17 or 20 or 21 or 22

24 exp Steroids/

25 exp Adrenal Cortex Hormones/

26 exp Glucocorticoids/

27 exp Anti‐Inflammatory Agents/

28 exp Anti‐Inflammatory Agents, Non‐Steroidal/

29 27 not 28

30 (steroid* or glucocorticoid* or corticosteroid* or glucosteroid* or cyclocosteroid* orbeclomethasone or beclometasone or beclamet or beclocort or becotide or betamethasone or betadexamethasone or flubenisolone or celeston* or cellestoderm or betnelan or oradexon or dexamethasone or dexameth or dexone or dexametasone or decadron or dexasone or hexadecadron or hexadrol or methylfluorprednisolone or millicorten or flunisolide or fluticasone or hydrocortisone or cortisol or cortifair or cortril or hyrocortone or cortef or epicortisol or efcortesol or Cortisone or methylprednisolone or medrol or metripred or urbason or mometasone or prednisolone or precortisyl or deltacortril or deltastab or prednesol or deltasone or prednisone or cortan or liquid next pred or meticorten or paramethasone or triamcinolone or aristocort or volon or atolone or kenacort or orasone or panasol or prednicen).ab,ti.

31 (corticoid* or betamethason* or betamethasone or hydrocortison* or celesto* or dexamethason* or hexadecadrol or budesonid* or horacort or pulmicort or rhinocort or methylfluorprednisolone or flunisolid* or nasalide or fluticason* or flonase or flounce or mometason* or nasonex or triamclinolon* or nasacort or (tri adj3 nasal) or aristocort or Ciclesonide).ab,ti.

32 24 or 25 or 26 or 29 or 30 or 31

33 23 and 32

Ovid Embase

Trial registries (via CRS)

1 exp sinusitis/ or paranasal sinus disease/

2 atrophic rhinitis/ or chronic rhinitis/ or rhinosinusitis/ or vasomotor rhinitis/

3 exp paranasal sinus/

4 (rhinosinusitis or nasosinusitis or pansinusitis or ethmoiditis or sphenoiditis).tw.

5 (kartagener* adj3 syndrome*).tw.

6 (inflamm* adj5 sinus*).tw.

7 ((maxilla* or frontal*) adj3 sinus*).tw.

8 1 or 2 or 3 or 4 or 5 or 6 or 7

9 exp chronic disease/

10 exp recurrent disease/

11 (chronic or persis* or recurrent*).tw.

12 9 or 10 or 11

13 8 and 12

14 CRSsNP.tw.

15 ((sinusitis or rhinitis) adj3 (chronic or persis* or recurrent*)).tw.

16 13 or 14 or 15

17 exp nose polyp/

18 exp nose disease/ or exp nose/

19 exp polyp/

20 18 and 19

21 ((nose or nasal or rhino* or rhinitis or sinus* or sinonasal) adj3 (papilloma* or polyp*)).tw.

22 (rhinopolyp* or CRSwNP).tw.

23 16 17 or or 20 or 21 or 22

24 exp *corticosteroid/

25 exp steroid/

26 exp antiinflammatory agent/

27 exp nonsteroid antiinflammatory agent/

28 26 not 27

29 (steroid* or glucocorticoid* or corticosteroid* or glucosteroid* or cyclocosteroid* or beclomethasone or beclometasone or beclamet or beclocort or becotide or betamethasone or betadexamethasone or flubenisolone or celeston* or cellestoderm or betnelan or oradexon or dexamethasone or dexameth or dexone or dexametasone or decadron or dexasone or hexadecadron or hexadrol or methylfluorprednisolone or millicorten or flunisolide or fluticasone or hydrocortisone or cortisol or cortifair or cortril or hyrocortone or cortef or epicortisol or efcortesol or Cortisone or methylprednisolone or medrol or metripred or urbason or mometasone or prednisolone or precortisyl or deltacortril or deltastab or prednesol or deltasone or prednisone or cortan or liquid next pred or meticorten or paramethasone or triamcinolone or aristocort or volon or atolone or kenacort or orasone or panasol or prednicen).tw.

30 24 or 28 or 29

31 23 and 30

ClinicalTrials.gov

Condition: rhinitis OR sinusitis OR rhinosinusitis OR (nose AND polyp*) OR (nasal AND polyp*) OR CRSsNP OR CRSwNP OR CRS

ICTRP

Title: rhinitis OR sinusitis OR rhinosinusitis OR CRSsNP OR CRSwNP OR CR

OR

All: (nose AND polyp*) OR (nasal AND polyp*)

NB These searches were run from 1 March 2015 to 11 August 2015, when these terms were last searched to populate the Cochrane ENT trials register in CRS

Appendix 2. Data extraction form

REF ID:

Study title:

Date of extraction:

Extracted by:

General comments/notes (internal for discussion):

Flow chart of trial

Group A (Intervention)

Group B (Comparison)

No. of people screened

No. of participants randomised ‐ all

No. randomised to each group

No. receiving treatment as allocated

No. not receiving treatment as allocated

‐ Reason 1

‐ Reason 2

No. dropped out

(no follow‐up data for any outcome available)

No. excluded from analysis1 (for all outcomes)

‐ Reason 1

‐ Reason 2

1This should be the people who received the treatment and were therefore not considered 'drop‐outs' but were excluded from all analyses (e.g. because the data could not be interpreted or the outcome was not recorded for some reason).

Information to go into 'Characteristics of included studies' table

Methods

X arm, double/single/non‐blinded, [multicentre] parallel‐group/cross‐over/cluster‐RCT, with x duration of treatment and x duration of follow‐up

Participants

Location: country, no of sites etc.

Setting of recruitment and treatment:

Sample size:

  • Number randomised: x in intervention, y in comparison

  • Number completed: x in intervention, y in comparison

Participant (baseline) characteristics:

  • Age:

  • Gender:

  • Main diagnosis: [as stated in paper]

  • Polyps status: x % with polyps/no information [add info on mean polyps score if available]

  • Previous sinus surgery status: [x% with previous surgery]

  • Previous courses of steroids: [add info on mean number of courses if available]

Other important effect modifiers, if applicable (e.g. aspirin sensitivity, comorbidities of asthma):

Inclusion criteria:[state diagnostic criteria used for CRS, polyps score if available]
Exclusion criteria:

Interventions

Intervention (n = x): drug name, method of administration, dose per day/frequency of administration, duration of treatment

Comparator group (n = y):

Use of additional interventions (common to both treatment arms):

Outcomes

Outcomes of interest in the review:

Primary outcomes:

  • Health‐related quality of life, disease‐specific

  • Disease severity symptom score

  • Significant adverse effects: [review specific]

Secondary outcomes:

  • Health‐related quality of life, generic

  • [Other review specific, pre‐specified adverse events]

  • [Other review specific, pre‐specified adverse events]

  • Endoscopy (polyps size or overall score)

  • CT scan

Other outcomes reported by the study:

  • [List outcomes reported but not of interest to the review]

Funding sources

'No information provided'/'None declared'/State source of funding

Declarations of interest

'No information provided'/'None declared'/State conflict

Notes

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Quote: "…"

Comment:

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Quote: "…"

Comment:

Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)

Quote: "…"

Comment:

Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)

Quote: "…"

Comment:

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)

Quote: "…"

Comment:

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Quote: "…"

Comment:

Other bias (see section 8.15)

Insensitive/non‐validated instrument?

Quote: "…"

Comment:

Other bias (see section 8.15)

Quote: "…"

Comment:

Findings of study: continuous outcomes

Results (continuous data table)

Outcome

Group A

Group B

Other summary stats/Notes

Mean

SD

N

Mean

SD

N

Mean difference (95% CI), P values etc.

Disease‐specific HRQL

(instrument name/range)

Time point:

Generic HRQL

(instrument name/range)

Time point:

Symptom score (overall)

(instrument name/range)

Time point:

Added total ‐ if scores reported separately for each symptom (range)

Time point:

Nasal blockage/obstruction/congestion

(instrument name/range)

Nasal discharge

(instrument name/range)

Facial pain/pressure

(instrument name/range)

Smell (reduction)

(instrument name/range)

Headache

(instrument name/range)

Cough (in children)

(instrument name/range)

Polyp size

(instrument name/range)

CT score

(instrument name/range)

Comments:

Results (dichotomous data table)

Outcome

Applicable review/intervention

Group A

Group B

Other summary stats/notes

No. of people with events

No. of people analysed

No. of people with events

No. of people analysed

P values, RR (95% CI), OR (95% CI)

Epistaxis/nose bleed

INCS

Saline irrigation

Local irritation (sore throat, oral thrush, discomfort)

INCS

Saline irrigation

Osteoporosis (minimum 6 months)

INCS

Stunted growth (children, minimum 6 months)

INCS

Can also be measured as average height

Mood disturbances

OCS

Gastrointestinal disturbances

(diarrhoea, nausea, vomiting, stomach irritation)

OCS

Antibiotics

Insomnia

OCS

Osteoporosis (minimum 6 months)

INCS

OCS

Discomfort

Saline irrigation

Skin irritation

Antibiotics

Anaphylaxis or other serious allergic reactions such as Stevens‐Johnson

Antibiotics

Comments:

Appendix 3. Forest plots

Please see Figure 4; Figure 5.


Forest plot of comparison: 1 High‐dose versus low‐dose intranasal corticosteroids, outcome: 1.1 Disease severity ‐ overall symptoms, measured as average change from baseline at 4 months (range 0 to 3).

Forest plot of comparison: 1 High‐dose versus low‐dose intranasal corticosteroids, outcome: 1.1 Disease severity ‐ overall symptoms, measured as average change from baseline at 4 months (range 0 to 3).


Forest plot of comparison: 1 High‐dose versus low‐dose intranasal corticosteroids, outcome: 1.2 Disease severity ‐ individual symptoms, measured as average change from baseline at 4 months (range 0 to 3).

Forest plot of comparison: 1 High‐dose versus low‐dose intranasal corticosteroids, outcome: 1.2 Disease severity ‐ individual symptoms, measured as average change from baseline at 4 months (range 0 to 3).

Process for sifting search results and selecting studies for inclusion.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Process for sifting search results and selecting studies for inclusion.

'Risk of bias' graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

'Risk of bias' graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.

'Risk of bias' summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 3

'Risk of bias' summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.

Forest plot of comparison: 1 High‐dose versus low‐dose intranasal corticosteroids, outcome: 1.1 Disease severity ‐ overall symptoms, measured as average change from baseline at 4 months (range 0 to 3).
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 4

Forest plot of comparison: 1 High‐dose versus low‐dose intranasal corticosteroids, outcome: 1.1 Disease severity ‐ overall symptoms, measured as average change from baseline at 4 months (range 0 to 3).

Forest plot of comparison: 1 High‐dose versus low‐dose intranasal corticosteroids, outcome: 1.2 Disease severity ‐ individual symptoms, measured as average change from baseline at 4 months (range 0 to 3).
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 5

Forest plot of comparison: 1 High‐dose versus low‐dose intranasal corticosteroids, outcome: 1.2 Disease severity ‐ individual symptoms, measured as average change from baseline at 4 months (range 0 to 3).

Comparison 1 High‐dose versus low‐dose intranasal corticosteroids, Outcome 1 Disease severity ‐ overall symptoms, measured as average change from baseline at 4 months (range 0 to 3).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 High‐dose versus low‐dose intranasal corticosteroids, Outcome 1 Disease severity ‐ overall symptoms, measured as average change from baseline at 4 months (range 0 to 3).

Comparison 1 High‐dose versus low‐dose intranasal corticosteroids, Outcome 2 Disease severity ‐ individual symptoms, measured as average change from baseline at 4 months (range 0 to 3).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 High‐dose versus low‐dose intranasal corticosteroids, Outcome 2 Disease severity ‐ individual symptoms, measured as average change from baseline at 4 months (range 0 to 3).

Comparison 1 High‐dose versus low‐dose intranasal corticosteroids, Outcome 3 Adverse effects: epistaxis.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 High‐dose versus low‐dose intranasal corticosteroids, Outcome 3 Adverse effects: epistaxis.

Comparison 1 High‐dose versus low‐dose intranasal corticosteroids, Outcome 4 Adverse effects: local irritation.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 High‐dose versus low‐dose intranasal corticosteroids, Outcome 4 Adverse effects: local irritation.

Comparison 1 High‐dose versus low‐dose intranasal corticosteroids, Outcome 5 Nasal polyps size, measured as change from baseline (0 to 3 range scale) at 4 months.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 High‐dose versus low‐dose intranasal corticosteroids, Outcome 5 Nasal polyps size, measured as change from baseline (0 to 3 range scale) at 4 months.

Comparison 1 High‐dose versus low‐dose intranasal corticosteroids, Outcome 6 Nasal polyps ‐ proportion with improvement at 12 weeks.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 High‐dose versus low‐dose intranasal corticosteroids, Outcome 6 Nasal polyps ‐ proportion with improvement at 12 weeks.

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Different types of intranasal corticosteroid molecules for chronic rhinosinusitis

Different types of intranasal corticosteroid molecules for chronic rhinosinusitis

Patient or population: chronic rhinosinusitis (all studies recruited patients with bilateral polyps)
Setting: Europe/North America about 20 years ago, in secondary care settings
Intervention: fluticasone propionate
Comparison: beclomethasone dipropionate or mometasone furoate

Outcomes

№ of participants
(studies)

Relative effect (95%)

Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI)

Quality

What happens

Low‐dose intranasal corticosteroids

High‐dose intranasal corticosteroids

Difference

Disease‐specific health‐related quality of life

Not measured

Impact unknown

Disease severity ‐ overall symptoms

  • Study 1: 37 participants

  • Study 2: 19 participants

  • Study 3: 100 participants

  • Study 1 (fluticasone propionate versus beclomethasone dipropionate): seemed to report results selectively, showing some benefits of fluticasone propionate for some symptoms

  • Study 2 (fluticasone propionate versus beclomethasone dipropionate): reported a "trend" towards less severity with fluticasone propionate compared to beclomethasone dipropionate

  • Study 3 (fluticasone propionate versus mometasone furoate): reported no statistically significant differences

⊕⊝⊝⊝
VERY LOW 1 2 3

No differences observed but evidence was too low quality to draw a conclusion

Adverse events: epistaxis

  • Study 1: 37 participants

  • Study 2: 19 participants

  • Study 3: 100 participants

  • Study 1 (fluticasone propionate versus beclomethasone dipropionate): 13/19 in fluticasone propionate group and 16/18 in beclomethasone dipropionate group had some form of adverse event, including epistaxis

  • Study 2 (fluticasone propionate versus beclomethasone dipropionate): 7/10 in fluticasone propionate group and 3/10 in beclomethasone dipropionate group had epistaxis

  • Study 3 (fluticasone propionate versus mometasone furoate): both drugs were "well tolerated"

⊕⊝⊝⊝
VERY LOW 1 2 3

Unclear whether the risk of epistaxis varies for different types of steroid molecules

*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: confidence interval

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect
Moderate quality: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different
Low quality: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect
Very low quality: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect

1Studies were either very small (n = 20 and n = 26) and had important drop‐outs or were only reported as an abstract with inadequate information available (n = 100). We considered all studies to be at unclear to high risk of selective reporting and attrition bias. The evidence was very low quality due to very serious imprecision and very serious risk of bias concerns.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings for the main comparison. Different types of intranasal corticosteroid molecules for chronic rhinosinusitis
Summary of findings 2. High‐dose versus low‐dose intranasal corticosteroids for chronic rhinosinusitis

High‐dose versus low‐dose intranasal corticosteroids for chronic rhinosinusitis

Patient or population: chronic rhinosinusitis (all studies recruited patients with bilateral polyps)
Setting: studies mostly conducted in Europe/North America about 10 years ago, in secondary care settings
Intervention: high‐dose intranasal corticosteroids
Comparison: low‐dose intranasal corticosteroids

Outcomes

№ of participants
(studies)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI)

Quality

What happens

Low‐dose intranasal corticosteroids

High‐dose intranasal corticosteroids

Difference

Disease‐specific health‐related quality of life

Not measured

Impact unknown

Disease severity ‐ overall symptoms, measured as average change from baseline at 4 months

All 4 EPOS domains

No information available

3 domains (nasal blockage, rhinorrhoea, loss of sense of smell) Range 0 to 3, lower score = less severe

№ of participants: 237
(1 RCT)

The mean disease severity ‐ overall symptoms, measured as average change from baseline at 4 months (range 0 to 3) ‐ average symptom score (3 domains) without high‐dose was

‐0.66 points

MD 0.13 points lower (0.37 lower to 0.11 more) than low‐dose group

⊕⊕⊝⊝
LOW 1 2 3

The average score for 3 types of symptoms seems to be similar between the high‐dose and low‐dose groups.

(2 domains: nasal blockage, rhinorrhoea)
Range 0 to 3, lower score = less severe

№ of participants: 441
(2 RCTs)

The mean disease severity ‐ overall symptoms, measured as average change from baseline at 4 months (range 0 to 3) ‐ average symptom score (2 domains) without high‐dose was

‐0.73 points

MD 0.19 points lower (0.36 lower to 0.02 lower) than low‐dose group

⊕⊕⊝⊝
LOW 1 2 3

The average score for 2 types of symptoms seems to be slightly lower for the high‐dose group. The clinical significance of this reduction is unclear.

Disease severity ‐ measured as average change from baseline at 4 months (range 0 to 3)

  • Nasal blockage (lower score = less severe)

№ of participants: 441
(2 RCTs)

The mean disease severity ‐ individual symptoms, measured as average change from baseline at 4 months (range 0 to 3) ‐ nasal blockage without high‐dose was

‐0.86 points

MD 0.24 points lower (0.39 lower to 0.08 lower) than low‐dose group

⊕⊕⊝⊝
LOW 1 2 3

The nasal blockage score seems to be slightly lower in the high‐dose group. The clinical significance of this reduction is unclear.

  • Rhinorrhoea (lower score = less severe)

№ of participants: 441

(2 RCTs)

The mean disease severity ‐ individual symptoms, measured as average change from baseline at 4 months (range 0 to 3) ‐ rhinorrhoea without high‐dose was

‐0.6 points

MD 0.15 points lower (0.33 lower to 0.03 higher) than low‐dose group

⊕⊕⊝⊝
LOW 1 2 3

The average score for rhinorrhoea seems to be similar between the high‐dose and low‐dose groups.

  • Loss of sense of smell (lower score = less severe)

№ of participants: 237
(1 RCT)

The mean disease severity ‐ individual symptoms, measured as average change from baseline at 4 months (range 0 to 3) ‐ loss of sense of smell without high‐dose was

‐0.6 points

MD 0.06 points higher (0.2 lower to 0.32 higher) than low‐dose group

⊕⊕⊝⊝
LOW 1 2 3

The average score for loss of sense of smell seems to be very similar between the high‐dose and low‐dose groups.

Adverse effects: epistaxis

№ of participants: 637
(4 RCTs)

RR 2.06
(1.20 to 3.54)

Study population

⊕⊕⊕⊝
MODERATE 4 5

The risk of epistaxis is likely to be higher in the higher‐dose groups. However, the studies included very minor nosebleeds, such as blood stains in the mucus, and most of these events are not likely to be severe.

57 per 1000

118 per 1000
(69 to 202)

61 more per 1000

(11 more to 145 more)

Moderate

60 per 1000

124 per 1000
(72 to 214)

64 more per 1000

(12 more to 153 more)

Adverse effects: local irritation

№ of participants: 542
(3 RCTs)

RR 0.97
(0.28 to 3.31)

Study population

⊕⊕⊝⊝
LOW 4 6 7

The risk of local irritation seems to be similar between groups, but the overall risks are underestimated due to the way the data were reported.

19 per 1000

18 per 1000
(5 to 62)

10 fewer per 1000

(13 fewer to 43 more)

Moderate

17 per 1000

17 per 1000
(5 to 58)

10 fewer per 1000

(13 fewer to 40 more)

*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: confidence interval; EPOS: European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps 2012;MD: mean difference; RCT: randomised controlled trial; RR: risk ratio; SD: standard deviation

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect
Moderate quality: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different
Low quality: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect
Very low quality: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect

1Scale validity, particularly discriminant validity (ability to distinguish the differences between groups), was unclear. There was a high risk of reporting bias. Studies tended to report enough information for meta‐analysis only for statistically significant results. One study, which had 101 participants, reported very similar values for both intervention arms for all disease scores but had no information related to SD.

2Small sample size ‐ evidence only from one or two relatively small studies.

3Only data from patients with bilateral nasal polyposis. We considered this to be indirectness of the evidence to patients without polyps but have not further downgraded the evidence.

4One of the studies had inadequate blinding ‐ a double dummy was not used to mask the twice daily (higher) versus once daily (lower) dose; the study had 101 participants.

5Sample size relatively small for a precise estimate of adverse events. We downgraded this outcome once, after taking into consideration the inadequate blinding in one of the studies and the relatively small sample size.

6Studies did not use consistent terminology/methods to report different types of local irritation. For analysis we only selected the most frequent types of local irritation from a list (to avoid double counting). This is a possible underestimation of overall event rates. The relatively low event rates and small sample size contributed to the large confidence intervals.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 2. High‐dose versus low‐dose intranasal corticosteroids for chronic rhinosinusitis
Comparison 1. High‐dose versus low‐dose intranasal corticosteroids

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Disease severity ‐ overall symptoms, measured as average change from baseline at 4 months (range 0 to 3) Show forest plot

2

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.1 Average symptom score (3 domains)

1

237

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.14 [‐0.39, 0.12]

1.2 Average symptom score (2 domains)

2

441

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.21 [‐0.40, ‐0.03]

2 Disease severity ‐ individual symptoms, measured as average change from baseline at 4 months (range 0 to 3) Show forest plot

2

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

2.1 Nasal blockage

2

441

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.29 [‐0.47, ‐0.10]

2.2 Rhinorrhoea

2

441

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.15 [‐0.34, 0.03]

2.3 Loss of sense of smell

1

237

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.06 [‐0.20, 0.31]

3 Adverse effects: epistaxis Show forest plot

4

637

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.06 [1.20, 3.54]

4 Adverse effects: local irritation Show forest plot

3

542

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.97 [0.28, 3.31]

5 Nasal polyps size, measured as change from baseline (0 to 3 range scale) at 4 months Show forest plot

1

237

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.19 [‐0.16, 0.54]

6 Nasal polyps ‐ proportion with improvement at 12 weeks Show forest plot

1

92

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.71 [0.91, 3.21]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. High‐dose versus low‐dose intranasal corticosteroids