Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Chlorpromazine structure
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Chlorpromazine structure

Penfluridol structure
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

Penfluridol structure

Study flow diagram.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 3

Study flow diagram.

'Risk of bias' graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 4

'Risk of bias' graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.

'Risk of bias' summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 5

'Risk of bias' summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.

Comparison 1 CHLORPROMAZINE versus PENFLURIDOL, Outcome 1 Service utilisation: 1. Hospital readmission.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 CHLORPROMAZINE versus PENFLURIDOL, Outcome 1 Service utilisation: 1. Hospital readmission.

Comparison 1 CHLORPROMAZINE versus PENFLURIDOL, Outcome 2 Adverse effects: 1a. General ‐ needing antiparkinsonian medication.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 CHLORPROMAZINE versus PENFLURIDOL, Outcome 2 Adverse effects: 1a. General ‐ needing antiparkinsonian medication.

Comparison 1 CHLORPROMAZINE versus PENFLURIDOL, Outcome 3 Adverse effects: 1b. General ‐ need to reduce antipsychotic dose due to side effects.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 CHLORPROMAZINE versus PENFLURIDOL, Outcome 3 Adverse effects: 1b. General ‐ need to reduce antipsychotic dose due to side effects.

Comparison 1 CHLORPROMAZINE versus PENFLURIDOL, Outcome 4 Adverse effects: 2a. Specific ‐ extrapyramidal events (moderate or severe) ‐ short term.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 CHLORPROMAZINE versus PENFLURIDOL, Outcome 4 Adverse effects: 2a. Specific ‐ extrapyramidal events (moderate or severe) ‐ short term.

Comparison 1 CHLORPROMAZINE versus PENFLURIDOL, Outcome 5 Adverse effects: 2b. Specific ‐ extrapyramidal events (moderate or severe) ‐ medium term.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 CHLORPROMAZINE versus PENFLURIDOL, Outcome 5 Adverse effects: 2b. Specific ‐ extrapyramidal events (moderate or severe) ‐ medium term.

Comparison 1 CHLORPROMAZINE versus PENFLURIDOL, Outcome 6 Adverse effects: 2c. Specific ‐ anticholinergic (moderate or severe) ‐ short term.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 CHLORPROMAZINE versus PENFLURIDOL, Outcome 6 Adverse effects: 2c. Specific ‐ anticholinergic (moderate or severe) ‐ short term.

Comparison 1 CHLORPROMAZINE versus PENFLURIDOL, Outcome 7 Adverse effects: 2d. Specific ‐ anticholinergic (moderate or severe) ‐ medium term.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.7

Comparison 1 CHLORPROMAZINE versus PENFLURIDOL, Outcome 7 Adverse effects: 2d. Specific ‐ anticholinergic (moderate or severe) ‐ medium term.

Comparison 1 CHLORPROMAZINE versus PENFLURIDOL, Outcome 8 Adverse effects: 2e. Specific ‐ central nervous system (moderate or severe) ‐ short term.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.8

Comparison 1 CHLORPROMAZINE versus PENFLURIDOL, Outcome 8 Adverse effects: 2e. Specific ‐ central nervous system (moderate or severe) ‐ short term.

Comparison 1 CHLORPROMAZINE versus PENFLURIDOL, Outcome 9 Adverse effects: 2f. Specific ‐ central nervous system (moderate or severe) ‐ medium term.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.9

Comparison 1 CHLORPROMAZINE versus PENFLURIDOL, Outcome 9 Adverse effects: 2f. Specific ‐ central nervous system (moderate or severe) ‐ medium term.

Comparison 1 CHLORPROMAZINE versus PENFLURIDOL, Outcome 10 Adverse effects: 2g. Specific ‐ various other effects (moderate or severe) ‐ short term.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.10

Comparison 1 CHLORPROMAZINE versus PENFLURIDOL, Outcome 10 Adverse effects: 2g. Specific ‐ various other effects (moderate or severe) ‐ short term.

Comparison 1 CHLORPROMAZINE versus PENFLURIDOL, Outcome 11 Adverse effects: 2h. Specific ‐ various other effects (moderate or severe) ‐ medium term.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.11

Comparison 1 CHLORPROMAZINE versus PENFLURIDOL, Outcome 11 Adverse effects: 2h. Specific ‐ various other effects (moderate or severe) ‐ medium term.

Comparison 1 CHLORPROMAZINE versus PENFLURIDOL, Outcome 12 Leaving the study early: 1a. Any reason.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.12

Comparison 1 CHLORPROMAZINE versus PENFLURIDOL, Outcome 12 Leaving the study early: 1a. Any reason.

Comparison 1 CHLORPROMAZINE versus PENFLURIDOL, Outcome 13 Leaving the study early: 1b. Due to adverse events.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.13

Comparison 1 CHLORPROMAZINE versus PENFLURIDOL, Outcome 13 Leaving the study early: 1b. Due to adverse events.

Table 2. Suggested design of study

Methods

Allocation: randomised, fully explicit description of methods of randomisation and allocation concealment.
Blinding: single‐blind or double‐blind, but tested.
Setting: anywhere.
Duration: follow‐up to at least 52 weeks.

Participants

Diagnosis: schizophrenia.
N = 300.*
Age: adults.
Sex: both.

Interventions

1. Chlorpromazine: oral‐maximum around 400 mg/day. N = 150.

2. Penfluridol: oral‐maximum around 80 mg/week. N = 150.

Both groups could receive antiparkinsonian medication as required.

Outcomes

Service utilisation: Hospital admission, time to admission.

Global state: Clinically significant response in global state, relapse.

Mental state: Clinically significant response in mental state.

Adverse effects: Clinically significant extrapyramidal side effects, death.

Leaving the study early.

Functioning: Employed, days working, in supportive relationship, healthy days.

Economic outcomes.

Notes

* Powered to be able to identify a difference of ˜ 20% between groups for primary outcome with adequate degree of certainty.

Figuras y tablas -
Table 2. Suggested design of study

Chlorpromazine versus Penfluridol for schizophrenia

Patient or population: patients with schizophrenia
Settings: hospital inpatients and outpatients
Intervention: Chlorpromazine versus penfluridol

Outcomes

Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No of Participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Assumed risk3

Corresponding risk

Penfluridol

Chlorpromazine

Service utilisation: hospital admission (short term)

150 per 1000

28 per 1000
(1 to 540)

RR 0.19 (0.01 to 3.60)

29
(1 study)

⊕⊕⊝⊝

low 1,2

Global state: clinically important change in global state

See comment

Not estimable

0
(0)

See comment

No studies reported 'clinically important change in global state'. Change in global state was measure using global state scales but all data were presented without SD.

Global state: relapse

See comment

Not estimable

0
(0)

See comment

No studies reported this outcome.

Mental state: clinically important change in mental state

See comment

Not estimable

0
(0)

See comment

No studies reported 'clinically important change in mental state'. Change in mental state was measure using mental state scales but all data were presented without SD.

Adverse effect/event: clinically important extrapyramidal adverse events ‐ akathisia (medium term)

200 per 1000

38 per 1000
(8 to 212)

RR 0.19

(0.04 to 1.06)

85
(2 studies)

⊕⊕⊝⊝

low 1,2

The same studies reported data for other extrapyramidal adverse events such as rigidity, tremor, dystonia and dyskinesia. There was no observable difference between chlorpromazine and penfluridol regarding any of these adverse effects.

Adverse effect/event: death

See comment

Not estimated

2 RCTs

(0)

See comment

No deaths reported.

Leaving the study early: any reason (medium term)

400 per 1000

484 per 1000
(332 to 708)

RR 1.21

(0.83 to 1.77)

130
(3 studies)

⊕⊕⊝⊝

low 1,2

*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: Confidence interval; RR: risk ratio; SD: standard deviation

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

1 Serious risk of bias: downgraded by one level ‐ study had an unclear risk of bias for random sequence generation and blinding of assessors.
2 Serious risk of imprecision: downgraded by one level ‐ studies had small sample sizes and number of events.
3 We have used the risk of an event in the penfluridol group within the trial/s the benchmark, rounding to nearest five for clarity of presentation in the table.

Figuras y tablas -
Table 1. Cochrane reviews on chlorpromazine for people with schizophrenia

Review title

Reference

Acetophenazine versus chlorpromazine

Bazrafshan 2015

Chlorpromazine dose for people with schizophrenia

Dudley 2009

Cessation of medication for people with schizophrenia already stable on chlorpromazine

Almerie 2007

Chlorpromazine versus atypical antipsychotic drugs for schizophrenia

Saha 2013

Chlorpromazine versus clotiapine for schizophrenia

Developing protocol

Chlorpromazine versus haloperidol for schizophrenia

Leucht 2008

Chlorpromazine versus metiapine

Zare 2015

Chlorpromazine versus penfluridol for schizophrenia

Current review

Chlorpromazine versus piperacetazine

Eslami 2015

Chlorpromazine versus placebo for schizophrenia

Adams 2014

Chlorpromazine for psychosis induced aggression or agitation

Ahmed 2010

Figuras y tablas -
Table 1. Cochrane reviews on chlorpromazine for people with schizophrenia
Comparison 1. CHLORPROMAZINE versus PENFLURIDOL

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Service utilisation: 1. Hospital readmission Show forest plot

1

29

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.19 [0.01, 3.60]

1.1 short term

1

29

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.19 [0.01, 3.60]

2 Adverse effects: 1a. General ‐ needing antiparkinsonian medication Show forest plot

2

74

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.70 [0.51, 0.95]

2.1 short term

1

33

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.82 [0.46, 1.46]

2.2 medium term

1

41

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.63 [0.43, 0.91]

3 Adverse effects: 1b. General ‐ need to reduce antipsychotic dose due to side effects Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

3.1 medium term

1

33

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.74 [0.26, 2.06]

4 Adverse effects: 2a. Specific ‐ extrapyramidal events (moderate or severe) ‐ short term Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

4.1 akatisia

1

33

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.2 dyskinesia

1

33

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.3 dystonia

1

33

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.4 rigidity

1

33

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.15 [0.01, 2.90]

4.5 tremor

1

33

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5 Adverse effects: 2b. Specific ‐ extrapyramidal events (moderate or severe) ‐ medium term Show forest plot

3

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

5.1 akathisia

2

85

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.19 [0.04, 1.06]

5.2 dyskinesia

2

85

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.97 [0.14, 6.52]

5.3 dystonia

1

29

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.93 [0.06, 13.54]

5.4 muscle spasm

1

56

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.0 [0.13, 70.64]

5.5 rigidity

2

70

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.22 [0.04, 1.20]

5.6 tremor

2

85

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.70 [0.14, 3.43]

6 Adverse effects: 2c. Specific ‐ anticholinergic (moderate or severe) ‐ short term Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

6.1 constipation

1

33

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

4.42 [0.60, 32.71]

6.2 dry mouth

1

33

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.25 [0.10, 51.46]

6.3 increased salivation

1

33

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.25 [0.01, 5.72]

7 Adverse effects: 2d. Specific ‐ anticholinergic (moderate or severe) ‐ medium term Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

7.1 blurred vision

1

29

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.31 [0.01, 7.09]

7.2 constipation

1

29

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.73 [0.47, 29.49]

7.3 dry mouth

1

29

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.81 [0.12, 63.83]

8 Adverse effects: 2e. Specific ‐ central nervous system (moderate or severe) ‐ short term Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

8.1 agitation

1

33

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.25 [0.10, 51.46]

8.2 drowsiness

1

33

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

8.25 [0.49, 137.94]

8.3 dizziness

1

33

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.25 [0.03, 2.12]

8.4 insomnia

1

33

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.25 [0.10, 51.46]

9 Adverse effects: 2f. Specific ‐ central nervous system (moderate or severe) ‐ medium term Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

9.1 drowsiness

2

85

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.05 [0.54, 2.05]

9.2 dizziness

1

29

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.47 [0.05, 4.60]

9.3 excitement

1

29

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.81 [0.12, 63.83]

9.4 faintness

1

29

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.93 [0.15, 5.76]

9.5 insomnia

2

85

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.17 [0.03, 0.93]

10 Adverse effects: 2g. Specific ‐ various other effects (moderate or severe) ‐ short term Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

10.1 heartburn

1

33

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10.2 increased alkaline phosphatase, bilirubin, SGOT

1

56

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.33 [0.01, 7.85]

10.3 systemic allergic reaction

1

33

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.25 [0.29, 94.14]

11 Adverse effects: 2h. Specific ‐ various other effects (moderate or severe) ‐ medium term Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

11.1 depression

1

29

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.19 [0.01, 3.60]

11.2 decreased sexual drive

1

29

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.47 [0.05, 4.60]

11.3 impotence

1

29

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.81 [0.12, 63.83]

11.4 photosensitivity

1

29

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.81 [0.12, 63.83]

11.5 poor appetite

1

29

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.93 [0.06, 13.54]

12 Leaving the study early: 1a. Any reason Show forest plot

3

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

12.1 medium term

3

130

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.21 [0.83, 1.77]

13 Leaving the study early: 1b. Due to adverse events Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

13.1 short term

1

33

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

6.75 [0.39, 116.00]

13.2 medium term

2

74

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.53 [0.72, 3.28]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. CHLORPROMAZINE versus PENFLURIDOL