Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Telerehabilitation services for stroke

Esta versión no es la más reciente

ver la versión actual 31 enero 2020

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010255Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 12 diciembre 2012see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Protocol
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:

  1. Grupo Cochrane de Accidentes cerebrovasculares

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2012 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Kate E Laver

    Correspondencia a: Department of Rehabilitation and Aged Care, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia

    [email protected]

  • Daniel Schoene

    Falls and Balance Research Group, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia

  • Maria Crotty

    Department of Rehabilitation and Aged Care, Flinders University, Repat Hospital, Daw Park, Australia

  • Stacey George

    Department of Rehabilitation and Aged Care, Flinders University, Daw Park, Australia

  • Natasha A Lannin

    Faculty of Health Science, Alfred Clinical School, La Trobe University, Prahran, Australia

  • Catherine Sherrington

    Musculoskeletal Division, The George Institute for Global Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia

Contributions of authors

Kate Laver is the guarantor of the review. Contributions include co‐ordinating the review, drafting the protocol, developing the search strategy, searching for trials, obtaining copies of the trials, selecting which trials to include, extracting data from the trials, entering data, carrying out the analysis, interpreting the analysis and drafting the final review.

Daniel Schoene is involved in drafting the protocol, searching for trials, extracting data from trials, interpreting the analysis and drafting the final review.

Maria Crotty is involved in drafting the protocol, selecting which trials to include (arbiter), interpreting the analysis and drafting the final review.

Stacey George is involved in drafting the protocol, selecting which trials to include, interpreting the analysis and drafting the final review.

Natasha Lannin is involved in drafting the protocol, carrying out the analysis, interpreting the analysis and drafting the final review.

Catherine Sherrington is involved in drafting the protocol, interpreting the analysis and drafting the final review.

All authors will be responsible for updating the review.

Declarations of interest

None known.

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Brenda Thomas for her assistance in designing the search strategy. We would also like to thank Cochrane editors Peter Langhorne, Alex Pollock and external peer reviewer Paul Davies.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2020 Jan 31

Telerehabilitation services for stroke

Review

Kate E Laver, Zoe Adey‐Wakeling, Maria Crotty, Natasha A Lannin, Stacey George, Catherine Sherrington

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010255.pub3

2013 Dec 16

Telerehabilitation services for stroke

Review

Kate E Laver, Daniel Schoene, Maria Crotty, Stacey George, Natasha A Lannin, Catherine Sherrington

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010255.pub2

2012 Dec 12

Telerehabilitation services for stroke

Protocol

Kate E Laver, Daniel Schoene, Maria Crotty, Stacey George, Natasha A Lannin, Catherine Sherrington

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010255

Keywords

MeSH

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) Keywords

Medical Subject Headings Check Words

Humans;

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.