Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Flow chart.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Flow chart.

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included trial.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 3

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included trial.

Funnel plot of comparison: 1. Teacher‐rated ADHD symptoms, outcome: 1.8 All data at low and high risk of bias (parallel‐group and cross‐over trials).
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 4

Funnel plot of comparison: 1. Teacher‐rated ADHD symptoms, outcome: 1.8 All data at low and high risk of bias (parallel‐group and cross‐over trials).

Trial Sequential Analysis: serious adverse events.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 5

Trial Sequential Analysis: serious adverse events.

Trial Sequential Analysis: non‐serious adverse events.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 6

Trial Sequential Analysis: non‐serious adverse events.

Comparison 1 Teacher‐rated ADHD symptoms, Outcome 1 All parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Teacher‐rated ADHD symptoms, Outcome 1 All parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials.

Comparison 1 Teacher‐rated ADHD symptoms, Outcome 2 Subgroup analysis: types of scales.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Teacher‐rated ADHD symptoms, Outcome 2 Subgroup analysis: types of scales.

Comparison 1 Teacher‐rated ADHD symptoms, Outcome 3 Medication status: medication naive versus not medication naive.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Teacher‐rated ADHD symptoms, Outcome 3 Medication status: medication naive versus not medication naive.

Comparison 1 Teacher‐rated ADHD symptoms, Outcome 4 Subgroup analysis: duration of treatment.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Teacher‐rated ADHD symptoms, Outcome 4 Subgroup analysis: duration of treatment.

Comparison 1 Teacher‐rated ADHD symptoms, Outcome 5 Subgroup analysis: dose.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 Teacher‐rated ADHD symptoms, Outcome 5 Subgroup analysis: dose.

Comparison 1 Teacher‐rated ADHD symptoms, Outcome 6 Subgroup analysis: parallel‐group trials compared with first‐period cross‐over trials.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 Teacher‐rated ADHD symptoms, Outcome 6 Subgroup analysis: parallel‐group trials compared with first‐period cross‐over trials.

Comparison 1 Teacher‐rated ADHD symptoms, Outcome 7 Subgroup analysis: trials with cohort selection bias of all participants compared with trials without cohort selection bias of all participants.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.7

Comparison 1 Teacher‐rated ADHD symptoms, Outcome 7 Subgroup analysis: trials with cohort selection bias of all participants compared with trials without cohort selection bias of all participants.

Comparison 1 Teacher‐rated ADHD symptoms, Outcome 8 ADHD symptoms, cross‐over trial (endpoint data).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.8

Comparison 1 Teacher‐rated ADHD symptoms, Outcome 8 ADHD symptoms, cross‐over trial (endpoint data).

Comparison 1 Teacher‐rated ADHD symptoms, Outcome 9 ADHD symptoms, cross‐over trials (endpoint data), subgroup analysis: dose.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.9

Comparison 1 Teacher‐rated ADHD symptoms, Outcome 9 ADHD symptoms, cross‐over trials (endpoint data), subgroup analysis: dose.

Comparison 1 Teacher‐rated ADHD symptoms, Outcome 10 Subgroup analysis: all parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials compared with cross‐over trials (endpoint data).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.10

Comparison 1 Teacher‐rated ADHD symptoms, Outcome 10 Subgroup analysis: all parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials compared with cross‐over trials (endpoint data).

Comparison 1 Teacher‐rated ADHD symptoms, Outcome 11 All parallel‐group trials and cross‐over trials: risk of bias.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.11

Comparison 1 Teacher‐rated ADHD symptoms, Outcome 11 All parallel‐group trials and cross‐over trials: risk of bias.

Comparison 2 Independent assessor‐rated ADHD symptoms, Outcome 1 All parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Independent assessor‐rated ADHD symptoms, Outcome 1 All parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials.

Comparison 2 Independent assessor‐rated ADHD symptoms, Outcome 2 Subgroup analysis: types of scales.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2 Independent assessor‐rated ADHD symptoms, Outcome 2 Subgroup analysis: types of scales.

Comparison 2 Independent assessor‐rated ADHD symptoms, Outcome 3 Subgroup analysis: duration of treatment.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.3

Comparison 2 Independent assessor‐rated ADHD symptoms, Outcome 3 Subgroup analysis: duration of treatment.

Comparison 2 Independent assessor‐rated ADHD symptoms, Outcome 4 Subgroup analysis: parallel‐group trials compared with first‐period cross‐over trials.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.4

Comparison 2 Independent assessor‐rated ADHD symptoms, Outcome 4 Subgroup analysis: parallel‐group trials compared with first‐period cross‐over trials.

Comparison 2 Independent assessor‐rated ADHD symptoms, Outcome 5 Subgroup analysis: trials with cohort selection bias of all participants compared with trials without cohort selection bias of all participants.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.5

Comparison 2 Independent assessor‐rated ADHD symptoms, Outcome 5 Subgroup analysis: trials with cohort selection bias of all participants compared with trials without cohort selection bias of all participants.

Comparison 2 Independent assessor‐rated ADHD symptoms, Outcome 6 Subgroup analysis: dose.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.6

Comparison 2 Independent assessor‐rated ADHD symptoms, Outcome 6 Subgroup analysis: dose.

Comparison 2 Independent assessor‐rated ADHD symptoms, Outcome 7 ADHD symptoms, cross‐over trials (endpoint data), subgroup analysis: risk of bias.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.7

Comparison 2 Independent assessor‐rated ADHD symptoms, Outcome 7 ADHD symptoms, cross‐over trials (endpoint data), subgroup analysis: risk of bias.

Comparison 2 Independent assessor‐rated ADHD symptoms, Outcome 8 ADHD symptoms, cross‐over trials (endpoint data), subgroup analysis: dose.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.8

Comparison 2 Independent assessor‐rated ADHD symptoms, Outcome 8 ADHD symptoms, cross‐over trials (endpoint data), subgroup analysis: dose.

Comparison 2 Independent assessor‐rated ADHD symptoms, Outcome 9 Subgroup analysis: all parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials compared with cross‐over trials (endpoint data).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.9

Comparison 2 Independent assessor‐rated ADHD symptoms, Outcome 9 Subgroup analysis: all parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials compared with cross‐over trials (endpoint data).

Comparison 3 Parent‐rated ADHD symptoms, Outcome 1 All parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3 Parent‐rated ADHD symptoms, Outcome 1 All parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials.

Comparison 3 Parent‐rated ADHD symptoms, Outcome 2 Subgroup analysis: types of scales.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.2

Comparison 3 Parent‐rated ADHD symptoms, Outcome 2 Subgroup analysis: types of scales.

Comparison 3 Parent‐rated ADHD symptoms, Outcome 3 Subgroup analysis: duration of treatment.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.3

Comparison 3 Parent‐rated ADHD symptoms, Outcome 3 Subgroup analysis: duration of treatment.

Comparison 3 Parent‐rated ADHD symptoms, Outcome 4 Subgroup analysis: dose.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.4

Comparison 3 Parent‐rated ADHD symptoms, Outcome 4 Subgroup analysis: dose.

Comparison 3 Parent‐rated ADHD symptoms, Outcome 5 Medication status: medication naive versus not medication naive.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.5

Comparison 3 Parent‐rated ADHD symptoms, Outcome 5 Medication status: medication naive versus not medication naive.

Comparison 3 Parent‐rated ADHD symptoms, Outcome 6 Subgroup analysis: trials with cohort selection bias of all participants compared with trials without cohort selection bias of all participants.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.6

Comparison 3 Parent‐rated ADHD symptoms, Outcome 6 Subgroup analysis: trials with cohort selection bias of all participants compared with trials without cohort selection bias of all participants.

Comparison 3 Parent‐rated ADHD symptoms, Outcome 7 Subgroup analysis: parallel‐group trials compared with first‐period cross‐over trials.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.7

Comparison 3 Parent‐rated ADHD symptoms, Outcome 7 Subgroup analysis: parallel‐group trials compared with first‐period cross‐over trials.

Comparison 3 Parent‐rated ADHD symptoms, Outcome 8 ADHD symptoms, cross‐over trials (endpoint data).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.8

Comparison 3 Parent‐rated ADHD symptoms, Outcome 8 ADHD symptoms, cross‐over trials (endpoint data).

Comparison 3 Parent‐rated ADHD symptoms, Outcome 9 ADHD symptoms, cross‐over trials (endpoint data), subgroup analysis: dose.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.9

Comparison 3 Parent‐rated ADHD symptoms, Outcome 9 ADHD symptoms, cross‐over trials (endpoint data), subgroup analysis: dose.

Comparison 3 Parent‐rated ADHD symptoms, Outcome 10 Subgroup analysis: all parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials compared with cross‐over trials (endpoint data).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.10

Comparison 3 Parent‐rated ADHD symptoms, Outcome 10 Subgroup analysis: all parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials compared with cross‐over trials (endpoint data).

Comparison 4 Additional subgroup analyses of ADHD symptoms: parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials, Outcome 1 Comparision of raters.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.1

Comparison 4 Additional subgroup analyses of ADHD symptoms: parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials, Outcome 1 Comparision of raters.

Comparison 4 Additional subgroup analyses of ADHD symptoms: parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials, Outcome 2 Age.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.2

Comparison 4 Additional subgroup analyses of ADHD symptoms: parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials, Outcome 2 Age.

Comparison 4 Additional subgroup analyses of ADHD symptoms: parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials, Outcome 3 Comorbidity versus no comorbidity.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.3

Comparison 4 Additional subgroup analyses of ADHD symptoms: parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials, Outcome 3 Comorbidity versus no comorbidity.

Comparison 4 Additional subgroup analyses of ADHD symptoms: parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials, Outcome 4 Subtypes ADHD: ADHD Rating Scale (parent‐, teacher‐ or independent assessor‐rated).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.4

Comparison 4 Additional subgroup analyses of ADHD symptoms: parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials, Outcome 4 Subtypes ADHD: ADHD Rating Scale (parent‐, teacher‐ or independent assessor‐rated).

Comparison 4 Additional subgroup analyses of ADHD symptoms: parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials, Outcome 5 Cross‐over trials: first‐period data versus endpoint data (parent‐, independent assessor‐ and teacher‐rated).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.5

Comparison 4 Additional subgroup analyses of ADHD symptoms: parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials, Outcome 5 Cross‐over trials: first‐period data versus endpoint data (parent‐, independent assessor‐ and teacher‐rated).

Comparison 5 Number of serious adverse events: parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials, Outcome 1 Number of serious adverse events (SAE).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.1

Comparison 5 Number of serious adverse events: parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials, Outcome 1 Number of serious adverse events (SAE).

Comparison 5 Number of serious adverse events: parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials, Outcome 2 Nervous system.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.2

Comparison 5 Number of serious adverse events: parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials, Outcome 2 Nervous system.

Comparison 5 Number of serious adverse events: parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials, Outcome 3 Digestive system: gastrointestinal disorders.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.3

Comparison 5 Number of serious adverse events: parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials, Outcome 3 Digestive system: gastrointestinal disorders.

Comparison 5 Number of serious adverse events: parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials, Outcome 4 Urinary system: kidney infection.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.4

Comparison 5 Number of serious adverse events: parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials, Outcome 4 Urinary system: kidney infection.

Comparison 5 Number of serious adverse events: parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials, Outcome 5 Circulatory and respiratory systems: asthma.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.5

Comparison 5 Number of serious adverse events: parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials, Outcome 5 Circulatory and respiratory systems: asthma.

Comparison 5 Number of serious adverse events: parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials, Outcome 6 Immune system: cyst rupture.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.6

Comparison 5 Number of serious adverse events: parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials, Outcome 6 Immune system: cyst rupture.

Comparison 5 Number of serious adverse events: parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials, Outcome 7 Other: drug toxicity.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.7

Comparison 5 Number of serious adverse events: parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials, Outcome 7 Other: drug toxicity.

Comparison 6 Number of serious adverse events: cross‐over trials (endpoint data), Outcome 1 Number of serious adverse events (SAE).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.1

Comparison 6 Number of serious adverse events: cross‐over trials (endpoint data), Outcome 1 Number of serious adverse events (SAE).

Comparison 6 Number of serious adverse events: cross‐over trials (endpoint data), Outcome 2 Hallucinations/psychosis.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.2

Comparison 6 Number of serious adverse events: cross‐over trials (endpoint data), Outcome 2 Hallucinations/psychosis.

Comparison 7 Number of non‐serious adverse events: parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials, Outcome 1 Total number of non‐serious adverse events.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.1

Comparison 7 Number of non‐serious adverse events: parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials, Outcome 1 Total number of non‐serious adverse events.

Comparison 7 Number of non‐serious adverse events: parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials, Outcome 2 Subgroup analysis: total number of non‐serious adverse events according to dose.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.2

Comparison 7 Number of non‐serious adverse events: parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials, Outcome 2 Subgroup analysis: total number of non‐serious adverse events according to dose.

Comparison 7 Number of non‐serious adverse events: parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials, Outcome 3 Nervous system.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.3

Comparison 7 Number of non‐serious adverse events: parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials, Outcome 3 Nervous system.

Comparison 7 Number of non‐serious adverse events: parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials, Outcome 4 Digestive system.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.4

Comparison 7 Number of non‐serious adverse events: parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials, Outcome 4 Digestive system.

Comparison 7 Number of non‐serious adverse events: parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials, Outcome 5 Circulatory and respiratory systems.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.5

Comparison 7 Number of non‐serious adverse events: parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials, Outcome 5 Circulatory and respiratory systems.

Comparison 7 Number of non‐serious adverse events: parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials, Outcome 6 Skeletal and muscular systems.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.6

Comparison 7 Number of non‐serious adverse events: parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials, Outcome 6 Skeletal and muscular systems.

Comparison 7 Number of non‐serious adverse events: parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials, Outcome 7 Immune system.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.7

Comparison 7 Number of non‐serious adverse events: parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials, Outcome 7 Immune system.

Comparison 7 Number of non‐serious adverse events: parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials, Outcome 8 Height.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.8

Comparison 7 Number of non‐serious adverse events: parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials, Outcome 8 Height.

Comparison 7 Number of non‐serious adverse events: parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials, Outcome 9 Weight.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.9

Comparison 7 Number of non‐serious adverse events: parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials, Outcome 9 Weight.

Comparison 7 Number of non‐serious adverse events: parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials, Outcome 10 BMI.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.10

Comparison 7 Number of non‐serious adverse events: parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials, Outcome 10 BMI.

Comparison 7 Number of non‐serious adverse events: parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials, Outcome 11 Vital signs.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.11

Comparison 7 Number of non‐serious adverse events: parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials, Outcome 11 Vital signs.

Comparison 7 Number of non‐serious adverse events: parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials, Outcome 12 Other.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.12

Comparison 7 Number of non‐serious adverse events: parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials, Outcome 12 Other.

Comparison 8 Number of non‐serious adverse events: cross‐over trials (endpoint data), Outcome 1 Total number of non‐serious adverse events.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 8.1

Comparison 8 Number of non‐serious adverse events: cross‐over trials (endpoint data), Outcome 1 Total number of non‐serious adverse events.

Comparison 8 Number of non‐serious adverse events: cross‐over trials (endpoint data), Outcome 2 Subgroup analysis: total number of non‐serious adverse events according to dose.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 8.2

Comparison 8 Number of non‐serious adverse events: cross‐over trials (endpoint data), Outcome 2 Subgroup analysis: total number of non‐serious adverse events according to dose.

Comparison 8 Number of non‐serious adverse events: cross‐over trials (endpoint data), Outcome 3 Nervous system.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 8.3

Comparison 8 Number of non‐serious adverse events: cross‐over trials (endpoint data), Outcome 3 Nervous system.

Comparison 8 Number of non‐serious adverse events: cross‐over trials (endpoint data), Outcome 4 Digestive system.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 8.4

Comparison 8 Number of non‐serious adverse events: cross‐over trials (endpoint data), Outcome 4 Digestive system.

Comparison 8 Number of non‐serious adverse events: cross‐over trials (endpoint data), Outcome 5 Urinary system: urinary incontinence.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 8.5

Comparison 8 Number of non‐serious adverse events: cross‐over trials (endpoint data), Outcome 5 Urinary system: urinary incontinence.

Comparison 8 Number of non‐serious adverse events: cross‐over trials (endpoint data), Outcome 6 Skeletal and muscular system: somatic complaints.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 8.6

Comparison 8 Number of non‐serious adverse events: cross‐over trials (endpoint data), Outcome 6 Skeletal and muscular system: somatic complaints.

Comparison 8 Number of non‐serious adverse events: cross‐over trials (endpoint data), Outcome 7 Immune system.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 8.7

Comparison 8 Number of non‐serious adverse events: cross‐over trials (endpoint data), Outcome 7 Immune system.

Comparison 8 Number of non‐serious adverse events: cross‐over trials (endpoint data), Outcome 8 Skin.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 8.8

Comparison 8 Number of non‐serious adverse events: cross‐over trials (endpoint data), Outcome 8 Skin.

Comparison 8 Number of non‐serious adverse events: cross‐over trials (endpoint data), Outcome 9 Vital signs.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 8.9

Comparison 8 Number of non‐serious adverse events: cross‐over trials (endpoint data), Outcome 9 Vital signs.

Comparison 8 Number of non‐serious adverse events: cross‐over trials (endpoint data), Outcome 10 Height (cm).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 8.10

Comparison 8 Number of non‐serious adverse events: cross‐over trials (endpoint data), Outcome 10 Height (cm).

Comparison 8 Number of non‐serious adverse events: cross‐over trials (endpoint data), Outcome 11 Weight.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 8.11

Comparison 8 Number of non‐serious adverse events: cross‐over trials (endpoint data), Outcome 11 Weight.

Comparison 9 Teacher‐rated general behaviour, Outcome 1 All parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials: risk of bias.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.1

Comparison 9 Teacher‐rated general behaviour, Outcome 1 All parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials: risk of bias.

Comparison 9 Teacher‐rated general behaviour, Outcome 2 Subgroup analysis: types of scales.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.2

Comparison 9 Teacher‐rated general behaviour, Outcome 2 Subgroup analysis: types of scales.

Comparison 9 Teacher‐rated general behaviour, Outcome 3 Subgroup analysis: dose.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.3

Comparison 9 Teacher‐rated general behaviour, Outcome 3 Subgroup analysis: dose.

Comparison 9 Teacher‐rated general behaviour, Outcome 4 Subgroup analysis: duration of treatment.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.4

Comparison 9 Teacher‐rated general behaviour, Outcome 4 Subgroup analysis: duration of treatment.

Comparison 9 Teacher‐rated general behaviour, Outcome 5 Subgroup analysis: parallel‐group trials versus first‐period cross‐over trials.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.5

Comparison 9 Teacher‐rated general behaviour, Outcome 5 Subgroup analysis: parallel‐group trials versus first‐period cross‐over trials.

Comparison 9 Teacher‐rated general behaviour, Outcome 6 General behaviour, cross‐over trials (endpoint data).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.6

Comparison 9 Teacher‐rated general behaviour, Outcome 6 General behaviour, cross‐over trials (endpoint data).

Comparison 9 Teacher‐rated general behaviour, Outcome 7 Subgroup analysis: general behaviour, cross‐over trials (endpoint data): risk of bias.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.7

Comparison 9 Teacher‐rated general behaviour, Outcome 7 Subgroup analysis: general behaviour, cross‐over trials (endpoint data): risk of bias.

Comparison 9 Teacher‐rated general behaviour, Outcome 8 Subgroup analysis: all parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials (teacher‐rated) versus cross‐over trials (endpoint data).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.8

Comparison 9 Teacher‐rated general behaviour, Outcome 8 Subgroup analysis: all parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials (teacher‐rated) versus cross‐over trials (endpoint data).

Comparison 10 Independent assessor‐rated general behaviour, Outcome 1 General behaviour, cross‐over trials (endpoint data).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 10.1

Comparison 10 Independent assessor‐rated general behaviour, Outcome 1 General behaviour, cross‐over trials (endpoint data).

Comparison 10 Independent assessor‐rated general behaviour, Outcome 2 Subgroup analysis: general behaviour, cross‐over trials (endpoint data): risk of bias.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 10.2

Comparison 10 Independent assessor‐rated general behaviour, Outcome 2 Subgroup analysis: general behaviour, cross‐over trials (endpoint data): risk of bias.

Comparison 10 Independent assessor‐rated general behaviour, Outcome 3 Subgroup analysis: all parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials (independent assessor‐rated) compared with cross‐over trials (endpoint data).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 10.3

Comparison 10 Independent assessor‐rated general behaviour, Outcome 3 Subgroup analysis: all parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials (independent assessor‐rated) compared with cross‐over trials (endpoint data).

Comparison 11 Parent‐rated general behaviour, Outcome 1 All parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 11.1

Comparison 11 Parent‐rated general behaviour, Outcome 1 All parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials.

Comparison 11 Parent‐rated general behaviour, Outcome 2 Subgroup analysis: risk of bias.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 11.2

Comparison 11 Parent‐rated general behaviour, Outcome 2 Subgroup analysis: risk of bias.

Comparison 11 Parent‐rated general behaviour, Outcome 3 Subgroup analysis: types of scales.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 11.3

Comparison 11 Parent‐rated general behaviour, Outcome 3 Subgroup analysis: types of scales.

Comparison 11 Parent‐rated general behaviour, Outcome 4 Subgroup analysis: parallel‐group trials compared with first‐period cross‐over trials.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 11.4

Comparison 11 Parent‐rated general behaviour, Outcome 4 Subgroup analysis: parallel‐group trials compared with first‐period cross‐over trials.

Comparison 11 Parent‐rated general behaviour, Outcome 5 Subgroup analysis: duration of treatment.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 11.5

Comparison 11 Parent‐rated general behaviour, Outcome 5 Subgroup analysis: duration of treatment.

Comparison 11 Parent‐rated general behaviour, Outcome 6 Subgroup analysis: dose.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 11.6

Comparison 11 Parent‐rated general behaviour, Outcome 6 Subgroup analysis: dose.

Comparison 11 Parent‐rated general behaviour, Outcome 7 General behaviour, cross‐over trials (endpoint data).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 11.7

Comparison 11 Parent‐rated general behaviour, Outcome 7 General behaviour, cross‐over trials (endpoint data).

Comparison 11 Parent‐rated general behaviour, Outcome 8 Subgroup analysis: general behaviour, cross‐over trials (endpoint data): risk of bias.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 11.8

Comparison 11 Parent‐rated general behaviour, Outcome 8 Subgroup analysis: general behaviour, cross‐over trials (endpoint data): risk of bias.

Comparison 11 Parent‐rated general behaviour, Outcome 9 Subgroup analysis: all parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials (parent‐rated) compared with cross‐over trials (endpoint data).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 11.9

Comparison 11 Parent‐rated general behaviour, Outcome 9 Subgroup analysis: all parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials (parent‐rated) compared with cross‐over trials (endpoint data).

Comparison 12 Additional subgroup analyses of general behaviour: parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials, Outcome 1 Comparisions of raters.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 12.1

Comparison 12 Additional subgroup analyses of general behaviour: parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials, Outcome 1 Comparisions of raters.

Comparison 12 Additional subgroup analyses of general behaviour: parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials, Outcome 2 Comorbidity versus no comorbidity.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 12.2

Comparison 12 Additional subgroup analyses of general behaviour: parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials, Outcome 2 Comorbidity versus no comorbidity.

Comparison 12 Additional subgroup analyses of general behaviour: parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials, Outcome 3 Cross‐over trials: first‐period data versus endpoint data (teacher‐, parent‐, and independent assessor‐rated).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 12.3

Comparison 12 Additional subgroup analyses of general behaviour: parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials, Outcome 3 Cross‐over trials: first‐period data versus endpoint data (teacher‐, parent‐, and independent assessor‐rated).

Comparison 13 Quality of life: parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials, Outcome 1 Subgroup analysis: types of scales.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 13.1

Comparison 13 Quality of life: parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials, Outcome 1 Subgroup analysis: types of scales.

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Methylphenidate compared with placebo or no intervention for ADHD

Methylphenidate compared with placebo or no intervention for ADHD

Patient or population: children and adolescents (up to and including 18 years of age) with ADHD
Settings: out‐patient clinic, in‐patient hospital ward and summer school
Intervention: methylphenidate
Comparison: placebo or no intervention

Outcomes

Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

Number of participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Assumed risk

Corresponding risk

Placebo or no intervention

Methylphenidate

ADHD symptoms: all parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials
ADHD Rating Scale (Teacher‐rated)

Average study duration: 74.8 days

Mean ADHD symptom score in the intervention groups corresponds to a mean difference of 9.6 (95% CI 11.25 to 8.00) on ADHD Rating Scale

SMD

‐0.77 (‐0.90 to ‐0.64)

1698
(19 studies)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
Very lowa,b

The analysis was conducted on a standardised scale with data from studies that used different teacher‐rated scales of symptoms (Conners' Teacher Rating Scale (CTRS), Strengths and Weaknesses of ADHD Symptoms and Normal Behaviour (SWAN) Scale, Schedule for Non‐adaptive and Adaptive Personality (SNAP) ‐ Teacher, Fremdbeurteilungsbogen für Hyperkinetische Störungen (FBB‐HKS)). The effect size has been translated on to the ADHD Rating Scale from the SMD

Total number of serious adverse events

Trial population

RR 0.98
(0.44 to 2.22)

1532
(9 studies)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
Very lowa,c

16 per 1000

16 per 1000
(7 to 36)

Total number of non‐serious adverse events

Trial population

RR 1.29
(1.10 to 1.51)

3132
(21 studies)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
Very lowa,b

408 per 1000

526 per 1000
(448 to 615)

General behaviour: all parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials
General behaviour rating scales (Teacher‐rated)

Mean general behaviour score in the intervention groups was 0.87 standard mean deviations lower (95% CI 1.04 to 0.71 lower)

SMD

‐0.87 (‐0.71 to ‐1.04)

668
(5 studies)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
Very lowa,d

Quality of life

(Parent‐rated)

Mean quality of life score in the intervention groups corresponds to a mean difference of 8.0 (95% CI 5.49 to 10.46) on the Child Health Questionnaire

SMD 0.61
(0.42 to 0.80)

514
(3 studies)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
Very lowa,e

*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
ADHD: Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder; CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk ratio; SMD: Standardised mean difference

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence.
High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

aDowngraded two levels due to high risk of bias (systematic errors causing overestimation of benefits and underestimation of harms) in several risk of bias domains, including lack of sufficient blinding and selective outcome reporting (many of the included trials did not report on this outcome).
bDowngraded one level due to inconsistency: moderate statistical heterogeneity.
c Downgraded one level due to imprecision: wide confidence intervals.
dDowngraded one level due to indirectness: children's general behavior was assessed by different types of rating scales with different focus on behavior.
e Downgraded one level due to indirectness: children's quality of life was assessed by their parents.

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings for the main comparison. Methylphenidate compared with placebo or no intervention for ADHD
Table 1. ADHD symptoms ‐ rating scales

Name of scale

Abbreviation

Reference

Abbreviated Conners’ Rating Scales, Parent (ACPRS) and Teacher (ACTRS),

including Abbreviated Parent Rating Scale (APRS) and Teacher Rating Scale, Hyperkinesis Index and ADHD and Emotional Lability subscales

ACRS

Conners 1997a

Abbreviated Symptom Questionnaire, including ASQ Teacher and ASQ Parent

ASQ

Conners 1995

Academic Performance Rating Scale

APRS

DuPaul 1991a

The ADD/H Comprehensive Teacher Rating Scale

ACTeRS

Ullmann 1984

ADHD/ODD Rating Scale, Parent‐ and Teacher‐Rated

ADHD‐RS

Barkley 1998

ADHD Rating Scale, including ADHD Rating Scale Parent and Teacher Ratings

ADHD‐RS

DuPaul 1991a

ADHD Rating Scale‐IV, including ADHD Rating Scale‐IV Parent and Teacher Versions

ADHD‐RS‐IV

DuPaul 1991a

Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale for Children

BPRS

Gale 1986

Child Attention Problems Rating Scale

CAP

Achenbach 1986

Child Attention Profile

CAP

Barkley 1988b

Child Behavior Rating Form

NCBHF

Aman 1996

Child Symptom Inventory

CSI

Gadow 1994

Children’s Psychiatric Rating Scale

CPRS

Pfefferbaum‐Levine 1983

Conners’ Abbreviated Hyperactivity Questionnaire

C‐HI

Conners 1997a

Conners’ Abbreviated Questionnaire

ASQ

Conners 1995

Conners’ Abbreviated Parent Teacher Questionnaire

APTQ

Rowe 1997

Conners’ Abbreviated Rating Scale

ABRS

Conners 1997a

Conners’ Abbreviated Symptom Questionnaire

ASQ

Conners 1995

Conners Abbreviated Symptom Questionnaire for Parents

ASQ‐Parent

Conners 1995

Conners’ Abbreviated Symptom Questionnaire for Teachers

ASQ‐Teacher

Conners 1997a

Conners’ Abbreviated Teacher Rating Scale

ABTRS

Conners 2001

Conners’ ADHD/DSM‐IV Scales Adolescent

CADS‐A

Conners 1997b

Conners’ ADHD/DSM‐IV Scales Parent

CADS–P, CADS‐P DSM‐IV

Conners 1997a

Conners’ ADHD/DSM‐IV Scale Teacher, including Inattentive and Hyperactive‐Impulsive subscales

CADS‐T, CADS‐T DSM‐IV

Conners 1997a

Conners’ Rating Scale ‐ Revised, Parent and Teacher: Hyperactivity and Conduct Factors score

CPRS‐R and CTRS‐R

Goyette 1978

Conners’ Hyperactivity Index, Parent and Teacher, including abbreviated versions

CPRS/CTRS‐Hyperactivity index

Conners 1997a

Conners’ Hyperkinesis Index

Milich 1980

Conners, Loney and Milich Scale

CLAM

Milich 1980

Conners’ Parent and Teacher Rating Scale ‐ Revised, Short Form

CRS‐R:S

Conners 1997a

Conners’ Parent Rating Scale, including abbreviated versions

CPRS

Conners 1998b

Conners’ Parent Rating Scale ‐ Revised

CPRS‐R

Conners 1997a

Conners’ Parent Rating Scale ‐ Revised, Short Form

CPRS‐R:S

Conners 1997a

Conners’ Parent Rating Scale ‐ Revised, Long Version

CPRS‐R:L

Conners 1997a

Conners’ Rating Scale ‐ Revised

CRS‐R

Conners 1997a

Conners’ Short Form Rating Scale, Parent and Teacher

Conners 1997a

Conners’ Teacher Rating Scale

CTRS

Conners 1998a

Conners’ Teacher Rating Scale ‐ Revised, Long Version

CTRS‐R:L

Conners 1998a

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Total

DSM‐IV

APA 1994

Diagnostiksystem für Psychische Störungen im Kindes ‐ und Jugendalter nach ICD‐10 und DSM‐IV,

Parental Questionnaire of ADHD symptoms

DISYPS

Döpfner 2000

Fremdbeurteilungsbogen für Hyperkinetische Störungen

FBB‐HKS

Döpfner 2008

German Teacher’s report on ADHD symptoms

FBB‐HKS of the DISYPS

Döpfner 2000

Hyperactivity Index of the Revised Conners Parent and Teacher Rating Scales

Goyette 1978

IOWA Conners Parent Rating Scale, including abbreviated versions

IOWA CPRS

Loney 1982

IOWA Conners Teacher Rating Scale, including abbreviated versions

IOWA CTRS

Loney 1982

IOWA Conners Teacher Rating Scale, Inattention/Overactivity (I/O) and Oppositional/Defiant (O/D) subscales

IOWA‐I/O and O/D subscales

Loney 1982

IOWA Inattention/Overactivity and Aggression/Noncompliance scales ‐ Parent and Teacher rating

IOWA

Loney 1982

Lehrer‐Fragenbogen von Steinhausen

LF

Steinhausen 1993

Loney’s Time on Task Scale, Hyperactivity, Attention and Aggression subscales

TOTS

Fitzpatrick 1992b

Modified Conner Scale Parent and Teacher

ACR

Conners 1997a

Mothers’ Objective Method for Subgrouping

MOMS

Loney 1984

Parent Symptom Checklist

PSC ADHD

Döpfner 2000

Parental Account of Children’s Symptoms

PACS

Chen 2006

Restricted Academic Situation Scale

RASS

Fischer 1998

Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia

K‐SADS/ K‐SADS‐E for diagnosis

Chambers 1985

Schedule for Non‐adaptive and Adaptive Personality

SNAP

Clark 1993; Clark 1996

Swanson, Nolan, and Pelham ‐ IV SNAP‐ADHD Rating scale

SNAP‐ADHD

Swanson 1992

Swanson, Nolan, and Pelham ‐ IV SNAP‐IV (Brazilian Version)

SNAP‐IV

Clark 1993; Clark 1996

Swanson, Kotkin, Atkins, M‐Flynn, Pelham Scale (SKAMP combined, SKAMP attention, and SKAMP deportment)

SKAMP (SKAMP combined, SKAMP attention, and SKAMP deportment)

Wigal 1998; Murray 2009

Teacher Self‐control Rating Scale

SCRS

Kendall 1979

Turgay ‐ DSM‐IV Scale, Parent

T‐DSM‐IV Scale, Parent

Turgay 1994; Ercan 2001

Turgay ‐ DSM‐IV Scale, Teacher

T‐DSM‐IV Scale, Teacher

Turgay 1994; Ercan 2001

Teacher Hyperactivity Index

THI

Achenbach 1991b

Teacher Symptom Checklist

TSC

Döpfner 2000

Vanderbilt ADHD Rating Scale

VADP(T)RS

Wolraich 2003

Wender Utah Rating Scale

WURS

Ward 1993

Wide Range Achievement Test

WRAT‐4

Wilkinson 2006

Wide Range Achievement Test Revised

WRAT‐R

Woodcock 2001

ADD/H: Attention deficit disorder with hyperactivity.
ADHD: Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.
DSM‐IV: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition.
ODD: Oppositional defiant disorder.

Figuras y tablas -
Table 1. ADHD symptoms ‐ rating scales
Table 2. Table 2: General behaviour rating scales

Name of scale

Abbreviation

Reference

Achenbach Child Behaviour Checklist

CBCL

Achenbach 1991a

Achenbach’s Teacher Report

ATRF

Achenbach 1991b; Achenbach 2001

ADHD Rating Scale

ADHD‐RS

DuPaul 1991a

ADHD School Observation Code

ADHD‐SOC

Gadow 1996

Barkley Scales, Disruptive Behavior Disorders Rating Scale

Barkley 1991a

Child Attention Problems Scale

CAP

Barkley 1991

Child Attention Profile

CAP

Barkley 1988b

Child Behavior Checklist

CBCL

Achenbach 1991a

Child Health Questionnaire

CHQ

Landgraf 1998

Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Assessment, selected items

CAPA

Angold 1995

Children’s Psychiatric Rating Scale

CPRS

Fish 1985

Classroom Observation Code (Abikoff Classroom Observational System)

COC

Abikoff 1980

Code for Observing Social Activity

COSA

Sprafkin 1986

Conners' Child Behavior Scale

UC‐CCBS

Ladd 1996

Conners' Global Index Scale

CGI‐S

Conners 1998a

Conners’ Global Index ‐ Parent

CGI‐P

Conners 1997a

Conners' Global Index ‐ Teacher

CGI‐T

Conners 1998a

Conners', Loney and Milich Scale

CLAM

Milich 1980

Conners’ Parent Questionnaire

CPQ

Conners 1995

Conners’ Parent Rating Scale

CPRS

Conners 1998b

Conners’ Teacher Rating Scale

CTRS

Conners 1998a

Conners’ Teacher Rating Conduct Problems

Miller 1997

Disruptive Behavior Disorders Rating Scale, Parent‐ and Teacher‐Rated

DBS

Mendelsohn 1978

Disruptive Behavior Disorders Rating Scale

DBD

Silva 2005b

Groninger Behaviour Observation Scale

GOO and GBO

Van der Meere 1999b

Groninger Behaviour Checklists, Parent and Teacher Versions of the abbreviated Groninger

GGGS and GGBS

Van der Meere 1999b

Hillside Behavior Rating Scale

HBRS

Gittleman‐Klein 1976

Home Situations Questionnaire

HSQ

Barkley 1987

Home Situations Questionnaire ‐ Revised

HSQ‐R

DuPaul 1992

Humphrey’s Teacher Self‐Control Rating Scale

TSCRS

Humphrey 1982

Hyperactivity Index from the Conners Revised Teacher Rating Scale

CTRS‐R‐Hyperactivity Index

Goyette 1978

Impairment Rating Scale

IRS

Fabiano 2006

Inpatient Global Rating Scale, Revised

IGRS

Conners 1985

Inpatient Global Rating Scale, Somatic factor

IGRS‐S

Conners 1985

IOWA Conners' Rating Scale, Oppositional/Defiant (O/D) subscales

IOWA‐O/D subscales

Loney 1982

Nisonger Child Behavior Rating Form

NCBRF

Aman 1996

Paired Associates Learning

PAL

Wechsler 1945

Parent Global Assessment for Improvement

PGA

McGough 2006a

Peer Conflict Scale

PCS

Marsee 2007

Personality Inventory for Children

PIC

Lachar 1986

School Situations Questionnaire

SSQ

Barkley 1987

School Situations Questionnaire ‐ Revised

SSQ‐R

DuPaul 1992

Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality

SNAP

Clark 1993; Clark 1996

Strengths and Weaknesses of ADHD Symptoms and Normal Behavior Scale, Parent and Teacher

SWAN

Swanson 2006; Polderman 2007

Subjective Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale

STESS‐R

Guy 1976

Swanson, Nolan and Pelham, Fourth Edition

SNAP‐IV

Bussing 2008

Teachers Report Form

TRF

Achenbach 1991b

Telephone Interview Probe (Parent and Teacher)

TIP

Corkum 2007

Vanderbilt ADHD rating scales: Vanderbilt ADHD Diagnostic Parent Rating Scale and Vanderbilt ADHD Diagnostic Teacher Rating Scale

VADPRS and VADTRS

Wolraich 2003

Wahler, House and Stambaugh’s Ecobehavioral Assessment System

ECO

Wahler 1976

The Weekly Parent Ratings of Evening and Morning Behaviour

WREMB‐R

Kelsey 2004

Werry‐Weiss‐Peters Activity Rating Scale

WWP

Routh 1978

Woodcock‐Johnson Achievement Battery

WJ‐III Ach

Woodcock 2001

ADHD: attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Figuras y tablas -
Table 2. Table 2: General behaviour rating scales
Table 3. Table 3: Quality of life ratings scales

Name of scale

Abbreviation

Reference

ADHD Impact Module‐Child

AIM‐C

AIM‐C 2013

Child Impact Scale and Home Impact Scale

CIS/HIS

Landgraf 2002

Child Health and Illness Profile, Child Edition: Parent Report Form

CHIP‐CE:PRF

Riley 2004

Child Health Questionnaire

CHQ‐P

Landgraf 1998

Children's Global Assessment Scale

CGAS

Shaffer 1983

Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale

CPRS

Aasberg 1978

Health Utilities Index ‐ 2

HUI‐2

Torrance 1982

ADHD: attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Figuras y tablas -
Table 3. Table 3: Quality of life ratings scales
Comparison 1. Teacher‐rated ADHD symptoms

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 All parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials Show forest plot

19

1698

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.77 [‐0.90, ‐0.64]

1.1 Low risk of bias

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.2 High risk of bias

19

1698

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.77 [‐0.90, ‐0.64]

2 Subgroup analysis: types of scales Show forest plot

19

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

2.1 Conners' Teacher Rating Scale (CTRS)

8

518

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.64 [‐0.82, ‐0.47]

2.2 Abbreviated Conners' Rating Scale (ACRS) ‐ Teacher

2

105

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.75 [‐1.79, 0.29]

2.3 Conners' Abbreviated Symptom Questionnaire for Teachers (ASQ‐Teacher)

1

59

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.28 [‐0.79, 0.23]

2.4 IOWA Conners' Teacher Rating Scale (IOWA CTRS) ‐ hyperactivity

2

193

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.08 [‐1.39, ‐0.77]

2.5 Schedule for Non‐adaptive and Adaptive Personality (SNAP) ‐ Teacher

2

328

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.61 [‐0.96, ‐0.25]

2.6 Teacher ratings of attention

1

20

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.55 [‐1.45, 0.35]

2.7 Teacher ratings of impulsivity

1

20

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.04 [‐0.83, 0.92]

2.8 IOWA Conners' Teacher Rating Scale ‐ Inattention/Overactivity (IOWA‐I/O)

2

197

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.03 [‐1.36, ‐0.69]

2.9 Fremdbeurteilungsbogen für Hyperkinetische Störungen (FBB‐HKS)

1

85

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.06 [‐1.52, ‐0.61]

2.10 Conners’ ADHD/DSM‐IV Scales ‐ Teacher (CADS‐T)

2

254

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.05 [‐1.31, ‐0.78]

2.11 Strengths and Weaknesses of ADHD Symptoms and Normal Behaviour (SWAN) Scale

1

64

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.33 [‐0.82, 0.17]

3 Medication status: medication naive versus not medication naive Show forest plot

6

717

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.79 [‐1.08, ‐0.50]

3.1 Medication naive

4

431

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.63 [‐0.94, ‐0.31]

3.2 Not medication naive

2

286

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.06 [‐1.33, ‐0.79]

4 Subgroup analysis: duration of treatment Show forest plot

19

1698

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.77 [‐0.90, ‐0.64]

4.1 Short term (up to 6 months)

18

1445

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.81 [‐0.94, ‐0.68]

4.2 Long term (over 6 months)

1

253

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.47 [‐0.72, ‐0.22]

5 Subgroup analysis: dose Show forest plot

19

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

5.1 Low dose

8

493

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.64 [‐0.82, ‐0.46]

5.2 High dose

7

688

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.81 [‐1.08, ‐0.54]

5.3 Unknown dose

6

669

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.87 [‐1.06, ‐0.68]

6 Subgroup analysis: parallel‐group trials compared with first‐period cross‐over trials Show forest plot

19

1698

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.77 [‐0.90, ‐0.64]

6.1 Parallel‐group trials

17

1506

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.80 [‐0.95, ‐0.65]

6.2 First‐period cross‐over trials

2

192

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.58 [‐0.87, ‐0.29]

7 Subgroup analysis: trials with cohort selection bias of all participants compared with trials without cohort selection bias of all participants Show forest plot

19

1698

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.77 [‐0.90, ‐0.64]

7.1 Trials with cohort selection bias of all participants

7

994

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.79 [‐1.01, ‐0.57]

7.2 Trials without cohort selection bias of all participants

12

704

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.76 [‐0.93, ‐0.59]

8 ADHD symptoms, cross‐over trial (endpoint data) Show forest plot

59

5145

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.93 [‐1.06, ‐0.80]

8.1 Low risk of bias

4

204

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.64 [‐0.97, ‐0.30]

8.2 High risk of bias

55

4941

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.95 [‐1.09, ‐0.82]

9 ADHD symptoms, cross‐over trials (endpoint data), subgroup analysis: dose Show forest plot

59

6821

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.85 [‐0.96, ‐0.74]

9.1 Low dose

42

3408

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.73 [‐0.89, ‐0.57]

9.2 High dose

36

3413

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.98 [‐1.13, ‐0.84]

10 Subgroup analysis: all parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials compared with cross‐over trials (endpoint data) Show forest plot

75

6344

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.91 [‐1.01, ‐0.80]

10.1 All parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials

19

1698

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.77 [‐0.90, ‐0.64]

10.2 Cross‐over trials (endpoint data)

56

4646

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.95 [‐1.09, ‐0.82]

11 All parallel‐group trials and cross‐over trials: risk of bias Show forest plot

75

6344

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.91 [‐1.01, ‐0.80]

11.1 Low risk of bias

4

204

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.64 [‐0.97, ‐0.30]

11.2 High risk of bias

71

6140

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.92 [‐1.03, ‐0.81]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Teacher‐rated ADHD symptoms
Comparison 2. Independent assessor‐rated ADHD symptoms

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 All parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials Show forest plot

10

1907

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.64 [‐0.89, ‐0.39]

1.1 Low risk of bias

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.2 High risk of bias

10

1907

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.64 [‐0.89, ‐0.39]

2 Subgroup analysis: types of scales Show forest plot

10

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

2.1 Swanson, Kotkin, Agler, M‐Glynn and Pelham (SKAMP) Scale

1

164

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.72 [‐1.04, ‐0.41]

2.2 ADHD Rating Scale (ADHD‐RS )

7

1442

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.71 [‐1.09, ‐0.32]

2.3 Swanson, Nolan and Pelham (SNAP) Scale

1

221

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.35 [‐0.61, ‐0.08]

2.4 Unknown

1

78

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.94 [‐1.41, ‐0.47]

3 Subgroup analysis: duration of treatment Show forest plot

10

1907

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.64 [‐0.89, ‐0.39]

3.1 Short term (up to 6 months)

9

1686

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.68 [‐0.95, ‐0.40]

3.2 Long term (over 6 months)

1

221

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.35 [‐0.61, ‐0.08]

4 Subgroup analysis: parallel‐group trials compared with first‐period cross‐over trials Show forest plot

10

1907

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.64 [‐0.89, ‐0.39]

4.1 Parallel‐group trials

7

1609

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.60 [‐0.91, ‐0.28]

4.2 First‐period cross‐over trials

3

298

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.76 [‐0.99, ‐0.52]

5 Subgroup analysis: trials with cohort selection bias of all participants compared with trials without cohort selection bias of all participants Show forest plot

10

1907

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.64 [‐0.89, ‐0.39]

5.1 Trials with cohort selection bias of all participants

4

630

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.51 [‐0.73, ‐0.29]

5.2 Trials without cohort selection bias of all participants

6

1277

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.72 [‐1.11, ‐0.33]

6 Subgroup analysis: dose Show forest plot

10

1907

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.64 [‐0.89, ‐0.39]

6.1 Low dose

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.2 High dose

6

1380

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.55 [‐0.91, ‐0.20]

6.3 Unknown dose

4

527

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.80 [‐0.98, ‐0.61]

7 ADHD symptoms, cross‐over trials (endpoint data), subgroup analysis: risk of bias Show forest plot

19

2471

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.00 [‐1.16, ‐0.84]

7.1 Low risk of bias

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7.2 High risk of bias

19

2471

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.00 [‐1.16, ‐0.84]

8 ADHD symptoms, cross‐over trials (endpoint data), subgroup analysis: dose Show forest plot

19

3874

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.89 [‐1.02, ‐0.75]

8.1 Low dose

16

2021

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.69 [‐0.82, ‐0.55]

8.2 High dose

12

1853

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.13 [‐1.31, ‐0.95]

9 Subgroup analysis: all parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials compared with cross‐over trials (endpoint data) Show forest plot

28

4215

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.83 [‐0.98, ‐0.67]

9.1 All parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials

10

1907

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.64 [‐0.89, ‐0.39]

9.2 Cross‐over trials (endpoint data)

18

2308

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.95 [‐1.13, ‐0.77]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 2. Independent assessor‐rated ADHD symptoms
Comparison 3. Parent‐rated ADHD symptoms

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 All parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials Show forest plot

21

2187

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.66 [‐0.82, ‐0.51]

1.1 Low risk of bias

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.2 High risk of bias

21

2187

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.66 [‐0.82, ‐0.51]

2 Subgroup analysis: types of scales Show forest plot

21

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

2.1 Conners' Parent Rating Scale (CPRS)

7

751

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.58 [‐0.87, ‐0.30]

2.2 ADHD Rating Scale ‐ Fourth Edition (ADHD‐RS‐IV)

2

194

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.30 [‐0.58, ‐0.02]

2.3 Fremdbeurteilungsbogen für Hyperkinetische Störungen (FBB‐HKS)

1

85

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.91 [‐1.36, ‐0.46]

2.4 Conners’ ADHD/DSM‐IV Scales ‐ Parent (CADS‐P)

1

120

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.26 [‐1.65, ‐0.86]

2.5 CADS‐P Inattentive subscale

1

109

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.78 [‐1.17, ‐0.39]

2.6 CADS‐P Hyperactivity subscale

1

109

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.93 [‐1.32, ‐0.53]

2.7 Clinican's Manual for the Assesment of Disruptive Behavior Disorders Rating Scale for Parents (Barkley)

1

41

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.21 [‐0.82, 0.41]

2.8 Abbreviated Conners' Rating Scale (ACRS) ‐ Parent

2

121

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.62 [‐0.99, ‐0.25]

2.9 Swanson, Nolan, and Pelham, Fourth Edition ‐ Parent (SNAP‐IV‐Parent) Scale

4

430

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.60 [‐0.79, ‐0.40]

2.10 Strengths and Weaknesses of ADHD Symptoms and Normal Behavior (SWAN) Scale

1

86

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.43 [‐0.86, 0.00]

2.11 IOWA Conners' Rating Scale ‐ Inattention/Overactivity (IOWA‐I/O)

3

352

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.78 [‐1.35, ‐0.21]

3 Subgroup analysis: duration of treatment Show forest plot

21

2187

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.66 [‐0.82, ‐0.51]

3.1 Short term (up to 6 months)

20

1925

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.67 [‐0.84, ‐0.50]

3.2 Long term (over 6 months)

1

262

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.58 [‐0.82, ‐0.33]

4 Subgroup analysis: dose Show forest plot

21

2335

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.64 [‐0.79, ‐0.48]

4.1 Low dose

5

329

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.53 [1.00, ‐0.07]

4.2 High dose

10

1132

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.60 [‐0.86, ‐0.33]

4.3 Unknown dose

8

874

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.72 [‐0.92, ‐0.52]

5 Medication status: medication naive versus not medication naive Show forest plot

7

795

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.76 [‐1.05, ‐0.48]

5.1 Medication naive

4

492

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.69 [‐1.03, ‐0.35]

5.2 Not medication naive

3

303

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.88 [‐1.33, ‐0.42]

6 Subgroup analysis: trials with cohort selection bias of all participants compared with trials without cohort selection bias of all participants Show forest plot

21

2187

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.66 [‐0.82, ‐0.51]

6.1 Trials with selection bias of all participants

10

1559

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.68 [‐0.86, ‐0.51]

6.2 Trials without cohort selection bias of all participants

11

628

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.62 [‐0.90, ‐0.33]

7 Subgroup analysis: parallel‐group trials compared with first‐period cross‐over trials Show forest plot

21

2187

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.66 [‐0.82, ‐0.51]

7.1 Parallel‐group trials

19

2094

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.66 [‐0.83, ‐0.50]

7.2 First‐period cross‐over trials

2

93

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.65 [‐1.07, ‐0.23]

8 ADHD symptoms, cross‐over trials (endpoint data) Show forest plot

41

3734

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.78 [‐0.90, ‐0.67]

8.1 Low risk of bias

4

204

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.54 [‐0.96, ‐0.13]

8.2 High risk of bias

37

3530

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.81 [‐0.92, ‐0.69]

9 ADHD symptoms, cross‐over trials (endpoint data), subgroup analysis: dose Show forest plot

41

4918

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.69 [‐0.79, ‐0.58]

9.1 Low dose

26

2272

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.65 [‐0.82, ‐0.48]

9.2 High dose

28

2646

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.72 [‐0.84, ‐0.60]

10 Subgroup analysis: all parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials compared with cross‐over trials (endpoint data) Show forest plot

59

5861

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.74 [‐0.83, ‐0.65]

10.1 All parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials

21

2215

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.66 [‐0.82, ‐0.51]

10.2 Cross‐over trials (endpoint data)

39

3646

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.79 [‐0.90, ‐0.67]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 3. Parent‐rated ADHD symptoms
Comparison 4. Additional subgroup analyses of ADHD symptoms: parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Comparision of raters Show forest plot

31

5697

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.69 [‐0.79, ‐0.59]

1.1 Teacher‐rated

19

1689

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.78 [‐0.93, ‐0.63]

1.2 Independent assessor‐rated

9

1829

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.61 [‐0.87, ‐0.35]

1.3 Parent‐rated

21

2179

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.65 [‐0.81, ‐0.50]

2 Age Show forest plot

6

1039

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.44 [‐0.74, ‐0.14]

2.1 2 to 6 years

1

64

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.33 [‐0.82, 0.17]

2.2 7 to 11 years

2

278

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.59 [‐1.03, ‐0.15]

2.3 12 to 18 years

3

697

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.38 [‐0.88, 0.12]

3 Comorbidity versus no comorbidity Show forest plot

20

2310

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.72 [‐0.91, ‐0.53]

3.1 ADHD with comorbidity

18

1981

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.72 [‐0.94, ‐0.51]

3.2 ADHD without comorbidity

2

329

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.69 [‐0.92, ‐0.46]

4 Subtypes ADHD: ADHD Rating Scale (parent‐, teacher‐ or independent assessor‐rated) Show forest plot

2

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

4.1 Combined ADHD

2

559

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.65 [‐1.30, 2.60]

4.2 Inattentive ADHD

1

204

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.31 [‐1.61, ‐1.01]

5 Cross‐over trials: first‐period data versus endpoint data (parent‐, independent assessor‐ and teacher‐rated) Show forest plot

4

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

5.1 First‐period data

4

372

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.64 [‐0.85, ‐0.44]

5.2 Endpoint data

4

372

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.91 [‐1.18, ‐0.65]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 4. Additional subgroup analyses of ADHD symptoms: parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials
Comparison 5. Number of serious adverse events: parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Number of serious adverse events (SAE) Show forest plot

9

1532

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.98 [0.44, 2.22]

2 Nervous system Show forest plot

6

2280

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.87 [0.30, 2.53]

2.1 Aggression

1

303

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.50 [0.05, 5.49]

2.2 Concussion

1

303

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.34 [0.01, 8.17]

2.3 Loss of consciousness

1

221

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.33 [0.01, 8.02]

2.4 Psychosis

4

712

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.78 [0.19, 16.96]

2.5 Syncope

3

741

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.39 [0.23, 8.47]

3 Digestive system: gastrointestinal disorders Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

4 Urinary system: kidney infection Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

5 Circulatory and respiratory systems: asthma Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

6 Immune system: cyst rupture Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

7 Other: drug toxicity Show forest plot

1

303

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.34 [0.01, 8.17]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 5. Number of serious adverse events: parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials
Comparison 6. Number of serious adverse events: cross‐over trials (endpoint data)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Number of serious adverse events (SAE) Show forest plot

8

1721

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.62 [0.34, 7.71]

2 Hallucinations/psychosis Show forest plot

4

187

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.10 [0.18, 6.72]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 6. Number of serious adverse events: cross‐over trials (endpoint data)
Comparison 7. Number of non‐serious adverse events: parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Total number of non‐serious adverse events Show forest plot

21

3132

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.29 [1.10, 1.51]

2 Subgroup analysis: total number of non‐serious adverse events according to dose Show forest plot

21

3135

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.28 [1.11, 1.49]

2.1 Low dose

2

151

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.09 [0.82, 1.46]

2.2 High dose

10

1761

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.22 [1.10, 1.35]

2.3 Unknown dose

10

1223

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.37 [1.01, 1.87]

3 Nervous system Show forest plot

21

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

3.1 Affective

4

390

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

2.39 [0.48, 11.96]

3.2 Aggression

2

417

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

1.16 [0.17, 7.80]

3.3 Apathy

1

59

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

0.80 [0.19, 3.33]

3.4 Confusion

2

548

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.22, 4.73]

3.5 Depression

1

59

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

0.83 [0.22, 3.10]

3.6 Dizziness

3

683

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

2.50 [0.70, 8.99]

3.7 Drowsiness

4

811

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

1.27 [0.82, 1.98]

3.8 Emotional lability

1

132

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

2.41 [0.27, 21.32]

3.9 Fatigue

7

858

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

0.76 [0.36, 1.63]

3.10 Headache

17

2724

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

1.22 [0.90, 1.64]

3.11 Insomnia

3

349

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

1.31 [0.35, 4.93]

3.12 Irritability

11

1721

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

1.11 [0.77, 1.60]

3.13 Nervousness

2

362

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

2.52 [0.82, 7.76]

3.14 Pain

1

132

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

1.91 [0.21, 17.60]

3.15 Picking at skin or fingers, nail biting, lip or cheek chewing

1

316

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.60, 1.70]

3.16 Sad, tearful or depressed

4

707

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

1.41 [0.86, 2.29]

3.17 Somnolence

2

173

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

0.59 [0.11, 3.11]

3.18 Trouble sleeping or sleep problems

13

2416

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

1.60 [1.15, 2.23]

3.19 Tics or nervous movements

8

1231

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

0.85 [0.26, 2.79]

3.20 Worried or anxious

3

596

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

1.37 [0.84, 2.25]

4 Digestive system Show forest plot

18

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

4.1 Decreased appetite

16

2962

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

3.66 [2.56, 5.23]

4.2 Decreased weight

6

859

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

3.89 [1.43, 10.59]

4.3 Diarrhoea

5

857

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.07 [0.41, 2.74]

4.4 Dyspepsia

2

159

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.80 [0.71, 4.54]

4.5 Increased appetite

1

179

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.07 [0.00, 1.43]

4.6 Nausea

11

1995

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.30 [0.85, 1.99]

4.7 Stomachache

13

2341

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.30 [1.00, 1.69]

4.8 Vomiting

11

1916

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.17 [0.76, 1.79]

5 Circulatory and respiratory systems Show forest plot

8

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

5.1 ECG: prolonged QT‐interval

2

466

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

0.81 [0.13, 5.00]

5.2 ECG: tachycardia

1

245

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

1.04 [0.11, 10.18]

5.3 Cough

4

996

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

0.95 [0.41, 2.18]

5.4 Nasal congestion

2

479

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

1.19 [0.59, 2.41]

5.5 Pharyngolaryngeal pain

1

303

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

1.12 [0.59, 2.13]

5.6 Supraventricular extrasystoles

1

17

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

3.00 [0.11, 84.55]

5.7 Upper respiratory tract infection

1

217

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

1.07 [0.42, 2.76]

6 Skeletal and muscular systems Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

6.1 Arthralgia

1

303

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.67 [0.24, 1.84]

6.2 Asthenia

1

177

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.21 [0.01, 4.25]

6.3 Back pain

1

303

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.81 [0.39, 1.66]

6.4 Myalgia

1

303

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.60 [0.23, 1.62]

6.5 Toothache

1

303

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.43, 2.35]

7 Immune system Show forest plot

7

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

7.1 Gastroenteritis

3

435

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

4.63 [0.99, 21.72]

7.2 Influenza

3

624

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.65 [0.20, 2.10]

7.3 Nasopharyngitis

5

979

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.15 [0.70, 1.87]

7.4 Otitis media

1

100

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.77 [0.17, 18.94]

7.5 Pharyngitis

2

293

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

2.43 [0.49, 12.05]

7.6 Pyrexia

2

400

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.02 [0.01, 87.72]

7.7 Rhinitis

1

132

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.28 [0.43, 3.79]

7.8 Upper respiratory tract infection ‐ not otherwise specified (NOS)

5

917

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.19 [0.68, 2.06]

7.9 Viral infection NOS

3

614

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.70 [0.23, 2.15]

8 Height Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

9 Weight Show forest plot

5

805

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.12 [‐1.55, ‐0.70]

10 BMI Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

11 Vital signs Show forest plot

9

3374

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.41 [0.30, 2.52]

11.1 Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)

8

1067

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.94 [‐0.12, 2.01]

11.2 Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)

8

1067

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.05 [‐1.25, 1.16]

11.3 Pulse or heart rate (bpm)

8

1240

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

3.41 [0.87, 5.94]

12 Other Show forest plot

5

1815

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.20 [0.56, 2.57]

12.1 Accidental injury

3

656

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.99 [0.48, 2.07]

12.2 Epistasis

1

132

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

4.25 [0.23, 77.22]

12.3 Excoriation

1

303

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

3.52 [1.19, 10.46]

12.4 Overdose

1

221

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

2.97 [0.12, 72.20]

12.5 Skin disorder (rash)

2

200

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.52 [0.01, 26.44]

12.6 Skin laceration

1

303

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.42 [0.15, 1.16]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 7. Number of non‐serious adverse events: parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials
Comparison 8. Number of non‐serious adverse events: cross‐over trials (endpoint data)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Total number of non‐serious adverse events Show forest plot

21

2072

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

1.33 [1.11, 1.58]

2 Subgroup analysis: total number of non‐serious adverse events according to dose Show forest plot

21

2859

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

1.26 [1.11, 1.44]

2.1 Low dose

16

1539

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

1.11 [0.94, 1.31]

2.2 High dose

12

1080

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

1.57 [1.22, 2.01]

2.3 Unknown dose

2

240

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

0.98 [0.51, 1.86]

3 Nervous system Show forest plot

50

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

3.1 Aggression

2

589

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

0.52 [0.17, 1.60]

3.2 Agitation

1

62

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

1.18 [0.38, 3.60]

3.3 Anger

3

264

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

0.45 [0.26, 0.77]

3.4 Behavioural complaints

1

82

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

0.55 [0.35, 0.86]

3.5 Buccal or lingual movements

4

302

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

1.06 [0.62, 1.79]

3.6 Compulsive acts

1

90

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

2.57 [1.45, 4.56]

3.7 Daydreaming

3

222

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

0.66 [0.44, 0.98]

3.8 Dizziness

9

746

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

1.17 [0.89, 1.55]

3.9 Drowsiness: dull, tired, listless or sleepy

21

1350

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

0.97 [0.73, 1.28]

3.10 Euphoria

6

405

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

1.06 [0.72, 1.57]

3.11 Headache

37

3752

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

1.21 [1.01, 1.45]

3.12 Insomnia or sleep problems

31

3270

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

1.57 [1.20, 2.06]

3.13 Irritability

23

2238

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

0.92 [0.66, 1.27]

3.14 Nightmares

10

686

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

0.97 [0.66, 1.42]

3.15 Overly meticulous

1

96

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

40.77 [2.35, 706.72]

3.16 Obsessive thinking

1

90

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

2.35 [1.53, 3.62]

3.17 Picking at skin or fingers, nail biting, lip or cheek chewing

15

888

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

1.12 [0.88, 1.41]

3.18 Repetitive language

1

48

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

1.0 [0.32, 3.10]

3.19 Sad, tearful or depressed

23

1849

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

1.15 [0.94, 1.41]

3.20 Socially withdrawn ‐ decreased interaction with others

12

771

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

1.24 [0.82, 1.87]

3.21 Sleep efficiency (SEF)

2

108

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

0.48 [0.02, 14.28]

3.22 Stares a lot

9

904

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

1.03 [0.75, 1.40]

3.23 Tics or nervous movements

19

1403

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

1.33 [1.03, 1.72]

3.24 Unusual blinking

1

48

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

3.13 [0.12, 80.68]

3.25 Worried or anxious

20

1673

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

0.82 [0.60, 1.12]

4 Digestive system Show forest plot

42

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

4.1 Decreased appetite or loss of appetite

35

3862

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

3.04 [2.35, 3.94]

4.2 Diarrhoea

3

402

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

0.58 [0.19, 1.74]

4.3 Dry mouth

5

342

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

1.25 [0.54, 2.90]

4.4 Dyspepsia

1

62

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

0.22 [0.02, 2.14]

4.5 Nausea

9

768

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

1.52 [1.00, 2.30]

4.6 Increased appetite

1

136

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

0.20 [0.08, 0.50]

4.7 Stomachache

33

3777

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

1.61 [1.27, 2.04]

4.8 Vomiting

4

710

Risk Ratio (Random, 95% CI)

0.90 [0.26, 3.11]

5 Urinary system: urinary incontinence Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

6 Skeletal and muscular system: somatic complaints Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

7 Immune system Show forest plot

7

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

7.1 Allergic rhinitis

4

475

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.38 [0.35, 5.51]

7.2 Fever

2

91

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.39 [0.09, 20.56]

7.3 Lymphadenitis

2

296

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

3.93 [0.44, 35.11]

7.4 Pharyngolaryngeal pain

1

160

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

2.0 [0.19, 21.62]

7.5 Pharyngitis

4

754

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.71 [0.19, 2.62]

7.6 Upper respiratory tract infection

5

888

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.61 [0.27, 1.37]

8 Skin Show forest plot

3

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

8.1 Rash

2

208

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.96 [0.14, 6.41]

8.2 Skin laceration

1

167

Risk Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

2.96 [0.12, 71.75]

9 Vital signs Show forest plot

14

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

9.1 Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)

11

755

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.23 [‐0.39, 2.86]

9.2 Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)

11

755

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.53 [‐1.30, 2.36]

9.3 Pulse or heart rate (bpm)

14

939

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

5.06 [2.88, 7.24]

10 Height (cm) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

11 Weight Show forest plot

6

530

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.06 [‐0.23, 0.11]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 8. Number of non‐serious adverse events: cross‐over trials (endpoint data)
Comparison 9. Teacher‐rated general behaviour

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 All parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials: risk of bias Show forest plot

5

668

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.87 [‐1.04, ‐0.71]

1.1 Low risk of bias

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.2 High risk of bias

5

668

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.87 [‐1.04, ‐0.71]

2 Subgroup analysis: types of scales Show forest plot

5

668

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.87 [‐1.04, ‐0.71]

2.1 Conners' Global Index ‐ Teacher (CGI‐T)

1

314

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.91 [‐1.14, ‐0.68]

2.2 Groninger Behaviour Observation Scale (GBOS)

1

43

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.84 [‐1.46, ‐0.21]

2.3 Conners' Teacher Rating Scale ‐ Conduct problems

1

25

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.67 [‐1.48, 0.14]

2.4 IOWA Conners' Rating Scale ‐ Oppositional/Defiant (IOWA‐O/D)

2

286

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.86 [‐1.12, ‐0.59]

3 Subgroup analysis: dose Show forest plot

5

696

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.85 [‐1.02, ‐0.69]

3.1 Low dose

2

71

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.67 [‐1.16, ‐0.19]

3.2 High dose

3

466

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.89 [‐1.08, ‐0.70]

3.3 Unknown dose

1

159

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.84 [‐1.21, ‐0.46]

4 Subgroup analysis: duration of treatment Show forest plot

5

668

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.87 [‐1.04, ‐0.71]

4.1 Short term (up to 6 months)

5

668

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.87 [‐1.04, ‐0.71]

4.2 Long term (over 6 months)

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5 Subgroup analysis: parallel‐group trials versus first‐period cross‐over trials Show forest plot

5

668

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.87 [‐1.04, ‐0.71]

5.1 Parallel‐group trials

5

668

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.87 [‐1.04, ‐0.71]

5.2 First‐period cross‐over trials

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6 General behaviour, cross‐over trials (endpoint data) Show forest plot

16

2014

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.69 [‐0.78, ‐0.60]

6.1 Low dose

13

1110

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.60 [‐0.72, ‐0.48]

6.2 High dose

12

904

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.82 [‐0.95, ‐0.68]

7 Subgroup analysis: general behaviour, cross‐over trials (endpoint data): risk of bias Show forest plot

16

1308

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.75 [‐0.87, ‐0.63]

7.1 Low risk of bias

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7.2 High risk of bias

16

1308

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.75 [‐0.87, ‐0.63]

8 Subgroup analysis: all parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials (teacher‐rated) versus cross‐over trials (endpoint data) Show forest plot

21

1976

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.79 [‐0.88, ‐0.70]

8.1 All parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials

5

668

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.87 [‐1.04, ‐0.71]

8.2 Cross‐over trials (endpoint data)

16

1308

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.75 [‐0.87, ‐0.63]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 9. Teacher‐rated general behaviour
Comparison 10. Independent assessor‐rated general behaviour

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 General behaviour, cross‐over trials (endpoint data) Show forest plot

8

1241

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.60 [‐0.75, ‐0.46]

1.1 Low dose

7

903

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.56 [‐0.76, ‐0.36]

1.2 High dose

5

338

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.71 [‐0.93, ‐0.49]

2 Subgroup analysis: general behaviour, cross‐over trials (endpoint data): risk of bias Show forest plot

8

951

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.69 [‐0.88, ‐0.49]

2.1 Low risk of bias

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.2 High risk of bias

8

951

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.69 [‐0.88, ‐0.49]

3 Subgroup analysis: all parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials (independent assessor‐rated) compared with cross‐over trials (endpoint data) Show forest plot

8

951

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.69 [‐0.88, ‐0.49]

3.1 Parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.2 Cross‐over trials (endpoint data)

8

951

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.69 [‐0.88, ‐0.49]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 10. Independent assessor‐rated general behaviour
Comparison 11. Parent‐rated general behaviour

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 All parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials Show forest plot

6

670

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.53 [‐0.78, ‐0.27]

2 Subgroup analysis: risk of bias Show forest plot

6

670

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.53 [‐0.78, ‐0.27]

2.1 Low risk of bias

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.2 High risk of bias

6

670

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.53 [‐0.78, ‐0.27]

3 Subgroup analysis: types of scales Show forest plot

6

670

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.53 [‐0.78, ‐0.27]

3.1 The Weekly Parent Ratings of Evening and Morning Behaviour (WPREMB) ‐ Revised

1

17

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.50 [‐0.47, 1.47]

3.2 Conners' Global Index (CGI) ‐ Parent

2

352

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.41 [‐0.63, ‐0.20]

3.3 Swanson, Nolan and Pelham, Fourth Edition ‐ Oppositional (SNAP‐IV‐Oppositional)

1

15

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.86 [‐1.95, 0.23]

3.4 IOWA Conners' Rating Scale ‐ Oppositional/Defiant (IOWA‐I/O)

2

286

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.75 [‐1.01, ‐0.49]

4 Subgroup analysis: parallel‐group trials compared with first‐period cross‐over trials Show forest plot

6

670

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.53 [‐0.78, ‐0.27]

4.1 Parallel‐group trials

5

655

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.51 [‐0.78, ‐0.23]

4.2 First‐period cross‐over trials

1

15

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.86 [‐1.95, 0.23]

5 Subgroup analysis: duration of treatment Show forest plot

6

670

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.53 [‐0.78, ‐0.27]

5.1 Short term (up to 6 months)

6

670

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.53 [‐0.78, ‐0.27]

5.2 Long term (over 6 months)

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6 Subgroup analysis: dose Show forest plot

6

670

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.53 [‐0.78, ‐0.27]

6.1 Low dose

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.2 High dose

4

496

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.42 [‐0.77, ‐0.08]

6.3 Unknown dose

2

174

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.73 [‐1.08, ‐0.38]

7 General behaviour, cross‐over trials (endpoint data) Show forest plot

6

550

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.75 [‐0.93, ‐0.56]

7.1 Low dose

5

248

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.65 [‐0.93, ‐0.38]

7.2 High dose

4

302

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.83 [‐1.07, ‐0.60]

8 Subgroup analysis: general behaviour, cross‐over trials (endpoint data): risk of bias Show forest plot

6

384

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.84 [‐1.05, ‐0.63]

8.1 Low risk of bias

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8.2 High risk of bias

6

384

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.84 [‐1.05, ‐0.63]

9 Subgroup analysis: all parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials (parent‐rated) compared with cross‐over trials (endpoint data) Show forest plot

12

1054

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.68 [‐0.86, ‐0.50]

9.1 All parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials

6

670

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.53 [‐0.78, ‐0.27]

9.2 Cross‐over trials (endpoint data)

6

384

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.84 [‐1.05, ‐0.63]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 11. Parent‐rated general behaviour
Comparison 12. Additional subgroup analyses of general behaviour: parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Comparisions of raters Show forest plot

8

1338

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.69 [‐0.86, ‐0.52]

1.1 Teacher‐rated

5

668

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.87 [‐1.04, ‐0.71]

1.2 Independent assessor‐rated

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.3 Parent‐rated

6

670

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.53 [‐0.78, ‐0.27]

2 Comorbidity versus no comorbidity Show forest plot

7

579

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.70 [‐0.98, ‐0.43]

2.1 ADHD with comorbidity

6

265

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.59 [‐0.95, ‐0.23]

2.2 ADHD without comorbidity

1

314

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.91 [‐1.14, ‐0.68]

3 Cross‐over trials: first‐period data versus endpoint data (teacher‐, parent‐, and independent assessor‐rated) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

3.1 First‐period data

1

16

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.81 [‐1.75, 0.13]

3.2 Endpoint data

1

14

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.14 [‐0.71, 1.00]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 12. Additional subgroup analyses of general behaviour: parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials
Comparison 13. Quality of life: parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Subgroup analysis: types of scales Show forest plot

3

514

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.61 [0.42, 0.80]

1.1 Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)

1

257

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.54 [0.25, 0.83]

1.2 Children´s Global Assessment Scale (CGAS)

1

36

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.79 [0.10, 1.47]

1.3 Child Health and Illness Profile, Child Edition: Parent Report Form (CHIP‐CE:PRF)

1

221

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.64 [0.37, 0.91]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 13. Quality of life: parallel‐group trials and first‐period cross‐over trials