Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Estimulación eléctrica neuromuscular para la debilidad muscular en adultos con enfermedades avanzadas

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009419.pub2Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 31 enero 2013see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Dolor y cuidados paliativos

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2013 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Matthew Maddocks

    Correspondencia a: Department of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Cicely Saunders Institute, King's College London, London, UK

    [email protected]

  • Wei Gao

    Department of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Cicely Saunders Institute, King's College London, London, UK

  • Irene J Higginson

    Department of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Cicely Saunders Institute, King's College London, London, UK

  • Andrew Wilcock

    Hayward House Macmillan Specialist Palliative Care Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK

Contributions of authors

All authors were involved in the drafting of the protocol and final review. MM and AW developed the search strategy, searched for and obtained copies of studies for potential inclusion. MM, GW and AW selected studies for inclusion and all authors extracted data from studies and assessed risk of bias. MM and GW entered data into RevMan (RevMan 2011) and carried out the analysis. All authors interpreted findings and approved the final review manuscript. MM is responsible for conducting any future update.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • Department of Palliative Medicine, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, UK.

    AW is employed by Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust

  • King's College London, Department of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, Cicely Saunders Institute, UK.

    MM, GW and IJH are employed by King's College London

External sources

  • National Institute of Health Research, UK.

    MM is funded by an NIHR Post‐Doctoral Fellowship award. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health.

Declarations of interest

MM and AW co‐authored one of the studies included in this review (Maddocks 2009). Neither were involved in the 'Risk of bias' assessment for this study.

MM is funded by an NIHR Post‐Doctoral Fellowship award. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health.

WG, IH and AW have no relevant interests to declare.

Acknowledgements

The search strategy was developed with the assistance of Jane Hayes, Trials Search Co‐ordinator, Cochrane Pain, Palliative and Supportive Care Review Group. Dr Hristina Petkova helped with the eligibility assessment for one excluded study (Sumin 2009) published in Russian.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2016 Oct 17

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation for muscle weakness in adults with advanced disease

Review

Sarah Jones, William D‐C Man, Wei Gao, Irene J Higginson, Andrew Wilcock, Matthew Maddocks

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009419.pub3

2013 Jan 31

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation for muscle weakness in adults with advanced disease

Review

Matthew Maddocks, Wei Gao, Irene J Higginson, Andrew Wilcock

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009419.pub2

2011 Nov 09

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation for muscle weakness in adults with advanced disease

Protocol

Matthew Maddocks, Wei Gao, Irene J Higginson, Andrew Wilcock

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009419

Differences between protocol and review

We added assessments of muscle histopathology and biochemistry as secondary outcomes in order to provide a more comprehensive overview of the evidence base for the intervention under study.

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.