Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Study flow diagram.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Study flow diagram.

'Risk of bias' graph: review authors' judgements about each 'risk of bias' item presented as percentages across all included studies.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

'Risk of bias' graph: review authors' judgements about each 'risk of bias' item presented as percentages across all included studies.

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 3

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.

Funnel plot of comparison: 1 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, by SSRI, outcome: 1.2 Disability.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 4

Funnel plot of comparison: 1 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, by SSRI, outcome: 1.2 Disability.

Comparison 1 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, by SSRI, Outcome 1 Dependent on modified Rankin score (mRS 3 to 5).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, by SSRI, Outcome 1 Dependent on modified Rankin score (mRS 3 to 5).

Comparison 1 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, by SSRI, Outcome 2 Disability.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, by SSRI, Outcome 2 Disability.

Comparison 1 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, by SSRI, Outcome 3 Neurological deficit score.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, by SSRI, Outcome 3 Neurological deficit score.

Comparison 1 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, by SSRI, Outcome 4 Depression (continuous data).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, by SSRI, Outcome 4 Depression (continuous data).

Comparison 1 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, by SSRI, Outcome 5 Depression (dichotomous data).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, by SSRI, Outcome 5 Depression (dichotomous data).

Comparison 1 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, by SSRI, Outcome 6 Anxiety (continuous data).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, by SSRI, Outcome 6 Anxiety (continuous data).

Comparison 1 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, by SSRI, Outcome 8 Cognition (continuous scores end of treatment).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.8

Comparison 1 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, by SSRI, Outcome 8 Cognition (continuous scores end of treatment).

Comparison 1 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, by SSRI, Outcome 9 Death.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.9

Comparison 1 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, by SSRI, Outcome 9 Death.

Comparison 1 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, by SSRI, Outcome 10 Seizures.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.10

Comparison 1 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, by SSRI, Outcome 10 Seizures.

Comparison 1 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, by SSRI, Outcome 11 Gastrointestinal side effects.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.11

Comparison 1 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, by SSRI, Outcome 11 Gastrointestinal side effects.

Comparison 1 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, by SSRI, Outcome 12 Bleeding.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.12

Comparison 1 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, by SSRI, Outcome 12 Bleeding.

Comparison 1 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, by SSRI, Outcome 14 Change in cognition between baseline and end of treatment.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.14

Comparison 1 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, by SSRI, Outcome 14 Change in cognition between baseline and end of treatment.

Comparison 1 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, by SSRI, Outcome 15 Leaving the trial before the end of scheduled follow‐up.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.15

Comparison 1 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, by SSRI, Outcome 15 Leaving the trial before the end of scheduled follow‐up.

Comparison 1 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, by SSRI, Outcome 16 Motor deficits.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.16

Comparison 1 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, by SSRI, Outcome 16 Motor deficits.

Comparison 2 SSRI versus control, at end of follow‐up, by SSRI, Outcome 1 Dependent on modified Rankin score.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 SSRI versus control, at end of follow‐up, by SSRI, Outcome 1 Dependent on modified Rankin score.

Comparison 2 SSRI versus control, at end of follow‐up, by SSRI, Outcome 2 Disability.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2 SSRI versus control, at end of follow‐up, by SSRI, Outcome 2 Disability.

Comparison 2 SSRI versus control, at end of follow‐up, by SSRI, Outcome 3 Neurological deficit score (higher score: worse outcome).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.3

Comparison 2 SSRI versus control, at end of follow‐up, by SSRI, Outcome 3 Neurological deficit score (higher score: worse outcome).

Comparison 2 SSRI versus control, at end of follow‐up, by SSRI, Outcome 4 Depression (continuous data).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.4

Comparison 2 SSRI versus control, at end of follow‐up, by SSRI, Outcome 4 Depression (continuous data).

Comparison 2 SSRI versus control, at end of follow‐up, by SSRI, Outcome 5 Depression (dichotomous data).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.5

Comparison 2 SSRI versus control, at end of follow‐up, by SSRI, Outcome 5 Depression (dichotomous data).

Comparison 2 SSRI versus control, at end of follow‐up, by SSRI, Outcome 6 Cognition (higher score is better).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.6

Comparison 2 SSRI versus control, at end of follow‐up, by SSRI, Outcome 6 Cognition (higher score is better).

Comparison 2 SSRI versus control, at end of follow‐up, by SSRI, Outcome 7 Change in cognition between baseline and follow‐up.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.7

Comparison 2 SSRI versus control, at end of follow‐up, by SSRI, Outcome 7 Change in cognition between baseline and follow‐up.

Comparison 2 SSRI versus control, at end of follow‐up, by SSRI, Outcome 8 Death.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.8

Comparison 2 SSRI versus control, at end of follow‐up, by SSRI, Outcome 8 Death.

Comparison 3 SSRI versus control (according to time since stroke when recruited), Outcome 1 Dependent on modified Rankin score.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3 SSRI versus control (according to time since stroke when recruited), Outcome 1 Dependent on modified Rankin score.

Comparison 3 SSRI versus control (according to time since stroke when recruited), Outcome 2 Disability.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.2

Comparison 3 SSRI versus control (according to time since stroke when recruited), Outcome 2 Disability.

Comparison 3 SSRI versus control (according to time since stroke when recruited), Outcome 3 Neurological deficit score.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.3

Comparison 3 SSRI versus control (according to time since stroke when recruited), Outcome 3 Neurological deficit score.

Comparison 3 SSRI versus control (according to time since stroke when recruited), Outcome 4 Depression (continuous).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.4

Comparison 3 SSRI versus control (according to time since stroke when recruited), Outcome 4 Depression (continuous).

Comparison 3 SSRI versus control (according to time since stroke when recruited), Outcome 5 Depression (dichotomous).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.5

Comparison 3 SSRI versus control (according to time since stroke when recruited), Outcome 5 Depression (dichotomous).

Comparison 3 SSRI versus control (according to time since stroke when recruited), Outcome 7 Anxiety (continuous).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.7

Comparison 3 SSRI versus control (according to time since stroke when recruited), Outcome 7 Anxiety (continuous).

Comparison 3 SSRI versus control (according to time since stroke when recruited), Outcome 8 Cognition.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.8

Comparison 3 SSRI versus control (according to time since stroke when recruited), Outcome 8 Cognition.

Comparison 3 SSRI versus control (according to time since stroke when recruited), Outcome 9 Death.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.9

Comparison 3 SSRI versus control (according to time since stroke when recruited), Outcome 9 Death.

Comparison 3 SSRI versus control (according to time since stroke when recruited), Outcome 10 Seizure.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.10

Comparison 3 SSRI versus control (according to time since stroke when recruited), Outcome 10 Seizure.

Comparison 3 SSRI versus control (according to time since stroke when recruited), Outcome 11 Gastrointestinal side effects.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.11

Comparison 3 SSRI versus control (according to time since stroke when recruited), Outcome 11 Gastrointestinal side effects.

Comparison 3 SSRI versus control (according to time since stroke when recruited), Outcome 12 Leaving the trial early.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.12

Comparison 3 SSRI versus control (according to time since stroke when recruited), Outcome 12 Leaving the trial early.

Comparison 3 SSRI versus control (according to time since stroke when recruited), Outcome 13 Bleeding.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.13

Comparison 3 SSRI versus control (according to time since stroke when recruited), Outcome 13 Bleeding.

Comparison 3 SSRI versus control (according to time since stroke when recruited), Outcome 14 Motor deficits.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.14

Comparison 3 SSRI versus control (according to time since stroke when recruited), Outcome 14 Motor deficits.

Comparison 4 SSRI versus control according to depression at time of recruitment, Outcome 1 Modified Rankin score.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.1

Comparison 4 SSRI versus control according to depression at time of recruitment, Outcome 1 Modified Rankin score.

Comparison 4 SSRI versus control according to depression at time of recruitment, Outcome 2 Disability.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.2

Comparison 4 SSRI versus control according to depression at time of recruitment, Outcome 2 Disability.

Comparison 4 SSRI versus control according to depression at time of recruitment, Outcome 3 Neurological deficit score.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.3

Comparison 4 SSRI versus control according to depression at time of recruitment, Outcome 3 Neurological deficit score.

Comparison 4 SSRI versus control according to depression at time of recruitment, Outcome 4 Depression (continuous).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.4

Comparison 4 SSRI versus control according to depression at time of recruitment, Outcome 4 Depression (continuous).

Comparison 4 SSRI versus control according to depression at time of recruitment, Outcome 5 Depression (dichotomous).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.5

Comparison 4 SSRI versus control according to depression at time of recruitment, Outcome 5 Depression (dichotomous).

Comparison 4 SSRI versus control according to depression at time of recruitment, Outcome 6 Anxiety (continuous).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.6

Comparison 4 SSRI versus control according to depression at time of recruitment, Outcome 6 Anxiety (continuous).

Comparison 4 SSRI versus control according to depression at time of recruitment, Outcome 8 Cognition.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.8

Comparison 4 SSRI versus control according to depression at time of recruitment, Outcome 8 Cognition.

Comparison 4 SSRI versus control according to depression at time of recruitment, Outcome 9 Death.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.9

Comparison 4 SSRI versus control according to depression at time of recruitment, Outcome 9 Death.

Comparison 4 SSRI versus control according to depression at time of recruitment, Outcome 10 Seizures.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.10

Comparison 4 SSRI versus control according to depression at time of recruitment, Outcome 10 Seizures.

Comparison 4 SSRI versus control according to depression at time of recruitment, Outcome 11 Gastrointestinal side effects.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.11

Comparison 4 SSRI versus control according to depression at time of recruitment, Outcome 11 Gastrointestinal side effects.

Comparison 4 SSRI versus control according to depression at time of recruitment, Outcome 12 Leaving the trial early.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.12

Comparison 4 SSRI versus control according to depression at time of recruitment, Outcome 12 Leaving the trial early.

Comparison 4 SSRI versus control according to depression at time of recruitment, Outcome 13 Bleeding.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.13

Comparison 4 SSRI versus control according to depression at time of recruitment, Outcome 13 Bleeding.

Comparison 4 SSRI versus control according to depression at time of recruitment, Outcome 14 Motor deficits.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.14

Comparison 4 SSRI versus control according to depression at time of recruitment, Outcome 14 Motor deficits.

Comparison 5 SSRI versus control, end of treatment, randomisation: low risk of bias, Outcome 1 Dependent on modified Rankin score (mRS 3 to 5).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.1

Comparison 5 SSRI versus control, end of treatment, randomisation: low risk of bias, Outcome 1 Dependent on modified Rankin score (mRS 3 to 5).

Comparison 5 SSRI versus control, end of treatment, randomisation: low risk of bias, Outcome 2 Disability.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.2

Comparison 5 SSRI versus control, end of treatment, randomisation: low risk of bias, Outcome 2 Disability.

Comparison 5 SSRI versus control, end of treatment, randomisation: low risk of bias, Outcome 3 Neurological deficit score.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.3

Comparison 5 SSRI versus control, end of treatment, randomisation: low risk of bias, Outcome 3 Neurological deficit score.

Comparison 5 SSRI versus control, end of treatment, randomisation: low risk of bias, Outcome 4 Depression (continuous data).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.4

Comparison 5 SSRI versus control, end of treatment, randomisation: low risk of bias, Outcome 4 Depression (continuous data).

Comparison 5 SSRI versus control, end of treatment, randomisation: low risk of bias, Outcome 5 Depression (dichotomous data).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.5

Comparison 5 SSRI versus control, end of treatment, randomisation: low risk of bias, Outcome 5 Depression (dichotomous data).

Comparison 5 SSRI versus control, end of treatment, randomisation: low risk of bias, Outcome 6 Anxiety (continuous data).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.6

Comparison 5 SSRI versus control, end of treatment, randomisation: low risk of bias, Outcome 6 Anxiety (continuous data).

Comparison 5 SSRI versus control, end of treatment, randomisation: low risk of bias, Outcome 8 Cognition (continuous scores end of treatment).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.8

Comparison 5 SSRI versus control, end of treatment, randomisation: low risk of bias, Outcome 8 Cognition (continuous scores end of treatment).

Comparison 5 SSRI versus control, end of treatment, randomisation: low risk of bias, Outcome 9 Death.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.9

Comparison 5 SSRI versus control, end of treatment, randomisation: low risk of bias, Outcome 9 Death.

Comparison 5 SSRI versus control, end of treatment, randomisation: low risk of bias, Outcome 10 Seizures.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.10

Comparison 5 SSRI versus control, end of treatment, randomisation: low risk of bias, Outcome 10 Seizures.

Comparison 5 SSRI versus control, end of treatment, randomisation: low risk of bias, Outcome 11 Gastrointestinal side effects.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.11

Comparison 5 SSRI versus control, end of treatment, randomisation: low risk of bias, Outcome 11 Gastrointestinal side effects.

Comparison 5 SSRI versus control, end of treatment, randomisation: low risk of bias, Outcome 14 Change in cognition between baseline and end of treatment.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.14

Comparison 5 SSRI versus control, end of treatment, randomisation: low risk of bias, Outcome 14 Change in cognition between baseline and end of treatment.

Comparison 5 SSRI versus control, end of treatment, randomisation: low risk of bias, Outcome 15 Leaving the trial before the end of scheduled follow‐up.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.15

Comparison 5 SSRI versus control, end of treatment, randomisation: low risk of bias, Outcome 15 Leaving the trial before the end of scheduled follow‐up.

Comparison 5 SSRI versus control, end of treatment, randomisation: low risk of bias, Outcome 16 Bleeding.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.16

Comparison 5 SSRI versus control, end of treatment, randomisation: low risk of bias, Outcome 16 Bleeding.

Comparison 6 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, concealment of allocation: low risk, Outcome 1 Dependent on modified Rankin score (mRS 3 to 5).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.1

Comparison 6 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, concealment of allocation: low risk, Outcome 1 Dependent on modified Rankin score (mRS 3 to 5).

Comparison 6 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, concealment of allocation: low risk, Outcome 2 Disability.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.2

Comparison 6 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, concealment of allocation: low risk, Outcome 2 Disability.

Comparison 6 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, concealment of allocation: low risk, Outcome 3 Neurological deficit score.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.3

Comparison 6 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, concealment of allocation: low risk, Outcome 3 Neurological deficit score.

Comparison 6 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, concealment of allocation: low risk, Outcome 4 Depression (continuous data).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.4

Comparison 6 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, concealment of allocation: low risk, Outcome 4 Depression (continuous data).

Comparison 6 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, concealment of allocation: low risk, Outcome 5 Depression (dichotomous data).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.5

Comparison 6 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, concealment of allocation: low risk, Outcome 5 Depression (dichotomous data).

Comparison 6 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, concealment of allocation: low risk, Outcome 6 Anxiety (continuous data).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.6

Comparison 6 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, concealment of allocation: low risk, Outcome 6 Anxiety (continuous data).

Comparison 6 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, concealment of allocation: low risk, Outcome 8 Cognition (continuous scores end of treatment).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.8

Comparison 6 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, concealment of allocation: low risk, Outcome 8 Cognition (continuous scores end of treatment).

Comparison 6 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, concealment of allocation: low risk, Outcome 9 Death.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.9

Comparison 6 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, concealment of allocation: low risk, Outcome 9 Death.

Comparison 6 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, concealment of allocation: low risk, Outcome 10 Seizures.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.10

Comparison 6 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, concealment of allocation: low risk, Outcome 10 Seizures.

Comparison 6 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, concealment of allocation: low risk, Outcome 11 Gastrointestinal side effects.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.11

Comparison 6 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, concealment of allocation: low risk, Outcome 11 Gastrointestinal side effects.

Comparison 6 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, concealment of allocation: low risk, Outcome 14 Change in cognition between baseline and end of treatment.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.14

Comparison 6 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, concealment of allocation: low risk, Outcome 14 Change in cognition between baseline and end of treatment.

Comparison 6 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, concealment of allocation: low risk, Outcome 15 Leaving the trial before the end of scheduled follow‐up.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.15

Comparison 6 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, concealment of allocation: low risk, Outcome 15 Leaving the trial before the end of scheduled follow‐up.

Comparison 7 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, patient/personnel blind: low risk of bias, Outcome 1 Dependent on modified Rankin score (mRS 3 to 5).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.1

Comparison 7 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, patient/personnel blind: low risk of bias, Outcome 1 Dependent on modified Rankin score (mRS 3 to 5).

Comparison 7 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, patient/personnel blind: low risk of bias, Outcome 2 Disability.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.2

Comparison 7 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, patient/personnel blind: low risk of bias, Outcome 2 Disability.

Comparison 7 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, patient/personnel blind: low risk of bias, Outcome 3 Neurological deficit score.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.3

Comparison 7 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, patient/personnel blind: low risk of bias, Outcome 3 Neurological deficit score.

Comparison 7 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, patient/personnel blind: low risk of bias, Outcome 4 Depression (continuous data).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.4

Comparison 7 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, patient/personnel blind: low risk of bias, Outcome 4 Depression (continuous data).

Comparison 7 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, patient/personnel blind: low risk of bias, Outcome 5 Depression (dichotomous data).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.5

Comparison 7 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, patient/personnel blind: low risk of bias, Outcome 5 Depression (dichotomous data).

Comparison 7 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, patient/personnel blind: low risk of bias, Outcome 6 Anxiety (continuous data).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.6

Comparison 7 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, patient/personnel blind: low risk of bias, Outcome 6 Anxiety (continuous data).

Comparison 7 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, patient/personnel blind: low risk of bias, Outcome 8 Cognition (continuous scores end of treatment).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.8

Comparison 7 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, patient/personnel blind: low risk of bias, Outcome 8 Cognition (continuous scores end of treatment).

Comparison 7 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, patient/personnel blind: low risk of bias, Outcome 9 Death.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.9

Comparison 7 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, patient/personnel blind: low risk of bias, Outcome 9 Death.

Comparison 7 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, patient/personnel blind: low risk of bias, Outcome 10 Seizures.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.10

Comparison 7 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, patient/personnel blind: low risk of bias, Outcome 10 Seizures.

Comparison 7 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, patient/personnel blind: low risk of bias, Outcome 11 Gastrointestinal side effects.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.11

Comparison 7 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, patient/personnel blind: low risk of bias, Outcome 11 Gastrointestinal side effects.

Comparison 7 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, patient/personnel blind: low risk of bias, Outcome 14 Change in cognition between baseline and end of treatment.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.14

Comparison 7 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, patient/personnel blind: low risk of bias, Outcome 14 Change in cognition between baseline and end of treatment.

Comparison 7 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, patient/personnel blind: low risk of bias, Outcome 15 Leaving the trial before the end of scheduled follow‐up.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.15

Comparison 7 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, patient/personnel blind: low risk of bias, Outcome 15 Leaving the trial before the end of scheduled follow‐up.

Comparison 8 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, outcome assessor blind: low risk of bias, Outcome 1 Dependent on modified Rankin score (mRS 3 to 5).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 8.1

Comparison 8 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, outcome assessor blind: low risk of bias, Outcome 1 Dependent on modified Rankin score (mRS 3 to 5).

Comparison 8 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, outcome assessor blind: low risk of bias, Outcome 2 Disability.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 8.2

Comparison 8 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, outcome assessor blind: low risk of bias, Outcome 2 Disability.

Comparison 8 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, outcome assessor blind: low risk of bias, Outcome 3 Neurological deficit score.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 8.3

Comparison 8 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, outcome assessor blind: low risk of bias, Outcome 3 Neurological deficit score.

Comparison 8 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, outcome assessor blind: low risk of bias, Outcome 4 Depression (continuous data).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 8.4

Comparison 8 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, outcome assessor blind: low risk of bias, Outcome 4 Depression (continuous data).

Comparison 8 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, outcome assessor blind: low risk of bias, Outcome 5 Depression (dichotomous data).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 8.5

Comparison 8 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, outcome assessor blind: low risk of bias, Outcome 5 Depression (dichotomous data).

Comparison 8 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, outcome assessor blind: low risk of bias, Outcome 6 Anxiety (continuous data).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 8.6

Comparison 8 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, outcome assessor blind: low risk of bias, Outcome 6 Anxiety (continuous data).

Comparison 8 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, outcome assessor blind: low risk of bias, Outcome 8 Cognition (continuous scores end of treatment).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 8.8

Comparison 8 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, outcome assessor blind: low risk of bias, Outcome 8 Cognition (continuous scores end of treatment).

Comparison 8 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, outcome assessor blind: low risk of bias, Outcome 9 Death.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 8.9

Comparison 8 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, outcome assessor blind: low risk of bias, Outcome 9 Death.

Comparison 8 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, outcome assessor blind: low risk of bias, Outcome 10 Seizures.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 8.10

Comparison 8 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, outcome assessor blind: low risk of bias, Outcome 10 Seizures.

Comparison 8 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, outcome assessor blind: low risk of bias, Outcome 11 Gastrointestinal side effects.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 8.11

Comparison 8 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, outcome assessor blind: low risk of bias, Outcome 11 Gastrointestinal side effects.

Comparison 8 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, outcome assessor blind: low risk of bias, Outcome 15 Leaving the trial before the end of scheduled follow‐up.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 8.15

Comparison 8 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, outcome assessor blind: low risk of bias, Outcome 15 Leaving the trial before the end of scheduled follow‐up.

Comparison 9 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, incomplete outcome data: low risk of bias, Outcome 1 Dependent on modified Rankin score (mRS 3 to 5).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.1

Comparison 9 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, incomplete outcome data: low risk of bias, Outcome 1 Dependent on modified Rankin score (mRS 3 to 5).

Comparison 9 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, incomplete outcome data: low risk of bias, Outcome 2 Disability.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.2

Comparison 9 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, incomplete outcome data: low risk of bias, Outcome 2 Disability.

Comparison 9 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, incomplete outcome data: low risk of bias, Outcome 3 Neurological deficit score.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.3

Comparison 9 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, incomplete outcome data: low risk of bias, Outcome 3 Neurological deficit score.

Comparison 9 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, incomplete outcome data: low risk of bias, Outcome 4 Depression (continuous data).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.4

Comparison 9 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, incomplete outcome data: low risk of bias, Outcome 4 Depression (continuous data).

Comparison 9 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, incomplete outcome data: low risk of bias, Outcome 5 Depression (dichotomous data).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.5

Comparison 9 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, incomplete outcome data: low risk of bias, Outcome 5 Depression (dichotomous data).

Comparison 9 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, incomplete outcome data: low risk of bias, Outcome 6 Anxiety (continuous data).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.6

Comparison 9 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, incomplete outcome data: low risk of bias, Outcome 6 Anxiety (continuous data).

Comparison 9 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, incomplete outcome data: low risk of bias, Outcome 8 Cognition (continuous scores end of treatment).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.8

Comparison 9 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, incomplete outcome data: low risk of bias, Outcome 8 Cognition (continuous scores end of treatment).

Comparison 9 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, incomplete outcome data: low risk of bias, Outcome 9 Death.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.9

Comparison 9 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, incomplete outcome data: low risk of bias, Outcome 9 Death.

Comparison 9 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, incomplete outcome data: low risk of bias, Outcome 10 Seizures.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.10

Comparison 9 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, incomplete outcome data: low risk of bias, Outcome 10 Seizures.

Comparison 9 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, incomplete outcome data: low risk of bias, Outcome 11 Gastrointestinal side effects.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.11

Comparison 9 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, incomplete outcome data: low risk of bias, Outcome 11 Gastrointestinal side effects.

Comparison 9 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, incomplete outcome data: low risk of bias, Outcome 12 Bleeding.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.12

Comparison 9 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, incomplete outcome data: low risk of bias, Outcome 12 Bleeding.

Comparison 9 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, incomplete outcome data: low risk of bias, Outcome 14 Change in cognition between baseline and end of treatment.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.14

Comparison 9 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, incomplete outcome data: low risk of bias, Outcome 14 Change in cognition between baseline and end of treatment.

Comparison 9 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, incomplete outcome data: low risk of bias, Outcome 15 Leaving the trial before the end of scheduled follow‐up.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.15

Comparison 9 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, incomplete outcome data: low risk of bias, Outcome 15 Leaving the trial before the end of scheduled follow‐up.

Comparison 10 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, selective reporting: low risk, Outcome 1 Dependent on modified Rankin score (mRS 3 to 5).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 10.1

Comparison 10 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, selective reporting: low risk, Outcome 1 Dependent on modified Rankin score (mRS 3 to 5).

Comparison 10 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, selective reporting: low risk, Outcome 2 Disability.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 10.2

Comparison 10 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, selective reporting: low risk, Outcome 2 Disability.

Comparison 10 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, selective reporting: low risk, Outcome 3 Neurological deficit score.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 10.3

Comparison 10 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, selective reporting: low risk, Outcome 3 Neurological deficit score.

Comparison 10 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, selective reporting: low risk, Outcome 4 Depression (continuous data).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 10.4

Comparison 10 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, selective reporting: low risk, Outcome 4 Depression (continuous data).

Comparison 10 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, selective reporting: low risk, Outcome 5 Depression (dichotomous data).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 10.5

Comparison 10 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, selective reporting: low risk, Outcome 5 Depression (dichotomous data).

Comparison 10 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, selective reporting: low risk, Outcome 6 Anxiety (continuous data).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 10.6

Comparison 10 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, selective reporting: low risk, Outcome 6 Anxiety (continuous data).

Comparison 10 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, selective reporting: low risk, Outcome 8 Cognition (continuous scores end of treatment).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 10.8

Comparison 10 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, selective reporting: low risk, Outcome 8 Cognition (continuous scores end of treatment).

Comparison 10 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, selective reporting: low risk, Outcome 9 Death.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 10.9

Comparison 10 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, selective reporting: low risk, Outcome 9 Death.

Comparison 10 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, selective reporting: low risk, Outcome 10 Seizures.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 10.10

Comparison 10 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, selective reporting: low risk, Outcome 10 Seizures.

Comparison 10 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, selective reporting: low risk, Outcome 11 Gastrointestinal side effects.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 10.11

Comparison 10 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, selective reporting: low risk, Outcome 11 Gastrointestinal side effects.

Comparison 10 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, selective reporting: low risk, Outcome 14 Change in cognition between baseline and end of treatment.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 10.14

Comparison 10 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, selective reporting: low risk, Outcome 14 Change in cognition between baseline and end of treatment.

Comparison 10 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, selective reporting: low risk, Outcome 15 Leaving the trial before the end of scheduled follow‐up.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 10.15

Comparison 10 SSRI versus control at end of treatment, selective reporting: low risk, Outcome 15 Leaving the trial before the end of scheduled follow‐up.

Comparison 1. SSRI versus control at end of treatment, by SSRI

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Dependent on modified Rankin score (mRS 3 to 5) Show forest plot

2

223

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.81 [0.68, 0.97]

1.1 Fluoxetine

1

112

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.81 [0.68, 0.97]

1.2 Sertraline

1

111

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 Disability Show forest plot

22

1310

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.92 [0.62, 1.23]

2.1 Fluoxetine

13

708

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.68 [0.31, 1.06]

2.2 Sertraline

1

130

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.38 [0.99, 1.76]

2.3 Citalopram

3

179

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.18 [‐0.22, 2.58]

2.4 Paroxetine

5

293

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.31 [0.67, 1.95]

2.5 Escitalopram

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.6 Sertraline or fluoxetine

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3 Neurological deficit score Show forest plot

29

2011

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.00 [‐1.26, ‐0.75]

3.1 Fluoxetine

17

1095

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.93 [‐1.29, ‐0.57]

3.2 Sertraline

2

108

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.26 [‐0.96, 0.45]

3.3 Citalopram

3

179

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.43 [‐2.25, ‐0.60]

3.4 Paroxetine

6

455

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.21 [‐1.68, ‐0.74]

3.5 Fluoxetine or sertraline

1

174

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.40 [‐1.73, ‐1.06]

4 Depression (continuous data) Show forest plot

39

2728

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.91 [‐2.34, ‐1.48]

4.1 Fluoxetine

21

1260

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.97 [‐2.63, ‐1.32]

4.2 Sertraline

4

383

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.13 [‐1.11, 0.85]

4.3 Citalopram

5

313

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.92 [‐3.08, ‐0.75]

4.4 Paroxetine

8

598

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐2.81 [‐3.66, ‐1.96]

4.5 Fluoxetine or sertraline

1

174

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.50 [‐1.84, ‐1.16]

4.6 Escitalopram

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5 Depression (dichotomous data) Show forest plot

8

771

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.43 [0.24, 0.77]

5.1 Fluoxetine

3

206

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.31 [0.17, 0.57]

5.2 Sertraline

2

166

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.59 [0.28, 1.25]

5.3 Citalopram

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.4 Paroxetine

2

282

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.53 [0.15, 1.92]

5.5 Escitalopram

1

117

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.38 [0.14, 0.99]

6 Anxiety (continuous data) Show forest plot

8

413

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.77 [‐1.52, ‐0.02]

6.1 Fluoxetine

4

169

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.23 [‐0.67, 0.21]

6.2 Sertraline

1

50

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.36 [‐0.20, 0.92]

6.3 Citalopram

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.4 Paroxetine

3

194

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.97 [‐3.81, ‐0.12]

6.5 Escitalopram

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7 Anxiety (dichotomous data)

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8 Cognition (continuous scores end of treatment) Show forest plot

7

425

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.32 [‐0.23, 0.86]

8.1 Fluoxetine

4

158

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.04 [‐0.27, 0.35]

8.2 Sertraline

1

80

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.53 [0.08, 0.98]

8.3 Citalopram

1

99

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.69 [1.23, 2.16]

8.4 Escitalopram

1

88

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.07 [‐0.49, 0.35]

9 Death Show forest plot

46

3344

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.76 [0.34, 1.70]

9.1 Fluoxetine

25

1502

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.78 [0.14, 4.39]

9.2 Sertraline

5

461

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.91 [0.20, 4.19]

9.3 Citalopram

5

341

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.77 [0.17, 3.38]

9.4 Paroxetine

9

739

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.2 [0.01, 4.01]

9.5 Escitalopram

1

117

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

4.92 [0.24, 100.25]

9.6 Sertraline or fluoxetine

1

184

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.2 [0.01, 4.11]

10 Seizures Show forest plot

7

444

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.67 [0.61, 11.63]

10.1 Fluoxetine

5

318

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.19 [0.41, 11.85]

10.2 Sertraline

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10.3 Citalopram

1

66

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

5.0 [0.25, 100.32]

10.4 Paroxetine

1

60

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10.5 Escitalopram

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10.6 Sertraline or fluoxetine

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11 Gastrointestinal side effects Show forest plot

14

902

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.90 [0.94, 3.85]

11.1 Fluoxetine

11

760

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.68 [0.82, 3.42]

11.2 Sertraline

1

28

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.33 [0.01, 7.55]

11.3 Citalopram

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11.4 Paroxetine

2

114

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

10.21 [1.32, 78.77]

11.5 Escitalopram

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11.6 Sertraline and paroxetine

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12 Bleeding Show forest plot

2

347

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.63 [0.20, 13.05]

12.1 Fluoxetine

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.2 Sertraline

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.3 Citalopram

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.4 Paroxetine

1

229

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

3.13 [0.13, 76.10]

12.5 Escitalopram

1

118

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.0 [0.06, 15.61]

12.6 Sertraline or fluoxetine

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

13 Change in depression scores between baseline and follow‐up

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

13.1 Sertraline

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

14 Change in cognition between baseline and end of treatment Show forest plot

1

99

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [‐0.39, 0.39]

14.1 Sertraline

1

99

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [‐0.39, 0.39]

15 Leaving the trial before the end of scheduled follow‐up Show forest plot

49

3851

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.02 [0.86, 1.21]

15.1 Fluoxetine

25

1585

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.21 [0.87, 1.67]

15.2 Sertraline

6

609

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.95 [0.69, 1.32]

15.3 Citalopram

5

339

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.20 [0.41, 3.47]

15.4 Paroxetine

11

1017

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.88 [0.51, 1.52]

15.5 Sertraline or fluoxetine

1

184

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.0 [0.26, 3.88]

15.6 Escitalopram

1

117

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.38 [0.46, 4.09]

16 Motor deficits Show forest plot

2

145

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.33 [‐1.22, 0.56]

16.1 Fluoxetine

2

145

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.33 [‐1.22, 0.56]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. SSRI versus control at end of treatment, by SSRI
Comparison 2. SSRI versus control, at end of follow‐up, by SSRI

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Dependent on modified Rankin score Show forest plot

1

94

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.38 [0.02, 9.04]

1.1 Sertraline

1

94

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.38 [0.02, 9.04]

1.2 Fluoxetine

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 Disability Show forest plot

2

155

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.78 [‐1.01, 4.57]

3 Neurological deficit score (higher score: worse outcome) Show forest plot

4

275

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.63 [‐1.30, 0.04]

3.1 Fluoxetine

3

195

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.77 [‐1.61, 0.08]

3.2 Sertraline

1

80

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.25 [‐0.69, 0.19]

4 Depression (continuous data) Show forest plot

4

275

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.10 [‐2.16, ‐0.04]

4.1 Fluoxetine

3

195

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.32 [‐2.74, 0.11]

4.2 Sertraline

1

80

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.47 [‐0.91, ‐0.03]

5 Depression (dichotomous data) Show forest plot

1

99

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.77 [0.34, 1.76]

5.1 Sertraline

1

99

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.77 [0.34, 1.76]

6 Cognition (higher score is better) Show forest plot

1

80

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.26 [‐0.18, 0.70]

6.1 Sertraline

1

80

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.26 [‐0.18, 0.70]

7 Change in cognition between baseline and follow‐up Show forest plot

1

99

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.02 [‐0.37, 0.42]

7.1 Sertraline

1

99

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.02 [‐0.37, 0.42]

8 Death Show forest plot

3

257

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.08 [0.00, 1.41]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 2. SSRI versus control, at end of follow‐up, by SSRI
Comparison 3. SSRI versus control (according to time since stroke when recruited)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Dependent on modified Rankin score Show forest plot

2

223

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.81 [0.68, 0.97]

1.1 Mean time since stroke < 2 weeks

2

223

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.81 [0.68, 0.97]

1.2 Mean time since stroke 2 weeks to 3 months at randomisation

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.3 Mean time since stroke 3 to 6 months at randomisation

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.4 Mean time since stroke > 6 months and < 9 months

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.5 Mean time since stroke at randomisation 9 to 12 months

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.6 Mean time since stroke not known

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 Disability Show forest plot

22

1310

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.92 [0.62, 1.23]

2.1 Mean time since stroke < 3 months

17

1004

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.77 [0.47, 1.06]

2.2 Mean time since stroke 3 to 6 months at randomisation

1

32

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.43 [‐0.27, 1.14]

2.3 Mean time since stroke > 6 months and < 9 months

1

60

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

2.67 [1.97, 3.38]

2.4 Mean time since stroke 9 to 12 months

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.5 Mean time since stroke not known

3

214

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.43 [0.40, 2.45]

3 Neurological deficit score Show forest plot

29

2011

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.00 [‐1.26, ‐0.75]

3.1 Mean time since stroke < 3 months

19

1183

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.01 [‐1.31, ‐0.72]

3.2 Mean time since stroke 3 to 6 months

1

32

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.27 [‐0.97, 0.42]

3.3 Mean time since stroke 6 to 9 months

2

140

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.40 [‐3.08, 0.28]

3.4 Mean time since stroke 9 to 12 months

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.5 Mean time since stroke not known

7

656

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.96 [‐1.56, ‐0.36]

4 Depression (continuous) Show forest plot

39

2728

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.91 [‐2.34, ‐1.48]

4.1 Time since stroke < 3 months

27

1697

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.96 [‐2.54, ‐1.37]

4.2 Time since stroke 3 to 6 months

3

223

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.16 [‐2.97, 0.65]

4.3 Time since stroke 6 to 9 months

2

140

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.56 [‐3.99, 0.86]

4.4 Time since stroke 9 to 12 months

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.5 Time since stroke not known

7

668

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐2.19 [‐2.62, ‐1.76]

5 Depression (dichotomous) Show forest plot

8

771

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.43 [0.24, 0.77]

5.1 Time since stroke < 3 months

7

546

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.39 [0.26, 0.57]

5.2 Time since stroke 3 to 6 months

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.3 Time since stroke 6 to 9 months

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.4 Time since stroke 9 to 12 months

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.5 Time since stroke unknown

1

225

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.87 [0.76, 0.99]

6 Anxiety (dichotomous)

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.1 Time since stroke < 3 months

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.2 Time since stroke 3 to 6 months

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.3 Time since stroke 6 to 9 months

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.4 Time since stroke 9 to 12 months

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.5 Time from stroke onset unknown

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7 Anxiety (continuous) Show forest plot

8

413

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.77 [‐1.52, ‐0.02]

7.1 Time since stroke < 3 months

8

413

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.77 [‐1.52, ‐0.02]

7.2 Time since stroke 3 to 6 months

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7.3 Time since stroke 6 to 9 months

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7.4 Time since stroke 9 to 12 months

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7.5 Time since stroke unknown

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8 Cognition Show forest plot

7

425

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.32 [‐0.23, 0.86]

8.1 Time since stroke < 3 months

5

273

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.28 [‐0.57, 1.13]

8.2 Time since stroke 3 to 6 months

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8.3 Time since stroke 6 to 9 months

1

80

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.53 [0.08, 0.98]

8.4 Time since stroke 9 to 12 months

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8.5 Time since stroke unknown

1

72

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.23 [‐0.23, 0.69]

9 Death Show forest plot

46

3404

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.76 [0.34, 1.70]

9.1 Time since stroke < 3 months

34

2311

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.94 [0.38, 2.36]

9.2 Time since stroke 3 to 6 months

4

369

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.20 [0.01, 4.02]

9.3 Time since stroke 6 to 9 months

2

140

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9.4 Time since stroke 9 to 12 months

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9.5 Time since stroke unknown

7

584

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.49 [0.07, 3.65]

10 Seizure Show forest plot

7

444

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.67 [0.61, 11.63]

10.1 Time since stroke < 3 months

6

409

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.22 [0.41, 12.06]

10.2 Time since stroke 3 to 6 months

1

35

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

4.74 [0.24, 92.07]

10.3 Time since stroke 6 to 9 months

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10.4 Time since stroke 9 to 12 months

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10.5 Time since stroke unknown

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11 Gastrointestinal side effects Show forest plot

14

902

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.90 [0.94, 3.85]

11.1 Time since stroke < 3 months

11

767

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.92 [0.83, 4.45]

11.2 Time since stroke 3 to 6 months

1

35

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

4.74 [0.24, 92.07]

11.3 Time since stroke 6 to 9 months

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11.4 Time since stroke 9 to 12 months

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11.5 Time since stroke unknown

2

100

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.51 [0.14, 16.29]

12 Leaving the trial early Show forest plot

49

3851

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.02 [0.86, 1.21]

12.1 Time since stroke < 3 months

34

2435

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.12 [0.90, 1.40]

12.2 Time since stroke 3 to 6 months

3

246

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.83 [0.59, 1.19]

12.3 Time since stroke 6 to 9 months

2

140

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.4 Time since stroke 9 to 12 months

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.5 Time since stroke not known

10

1030

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.97 [0.62, 1.51]

13 Bleeding Show forest plot

2

347

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.63 [0.20, 13.05]

13.1 Time since stroke < 3 months

1

118

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.0 [0.06, 15.61]

13.2 Time since stroke not known

1

229

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

3.13 [0.13, 76.10]

14 Motor deficits Show forest plot

2

145

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.33 [‐1.22, 0.56]

14.1 < 3 months

1

113

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.74 [‐1.12, ‐0.35]

14.2 3 to 6 months

1

32

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.18 [‐0.52, 0.87]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 3. SSRI versus control (according to time since stroke when recruited)
Comparison 4. SSRI versus control according to depression at time of recruitment

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Modified Rankin score Show forest plot

2

223

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.81 [0.68, 0.97]

1.1 Had to have depression at recruitment

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.2 Did not have to have depression at recruitment

2

223

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.81 [0.68, 0.97]

2 Disability Show forest plot

22

1310

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.92 [0.62, 1.23]

2.1 Had to have depression at recruitment

15

986

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.11 [0.71, 1.51]

2.2 Did not have to have depression at onset

7

324

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.55 [0.27, 0.84]

3 Neurological deficit score Show forest plot

29

2011

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.00 [‐1.26, ‐0.75]

3.1 Had to have depression at recruitment

19

1420

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.19 [‐1.47, ‐0.91]

3.2 Did not have to have depression at recruitment

10

591

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.63 [‐1.08, ‐0.17]

4 Depression (continuous) Show forest plot

39

2728

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.91 [‐2.34, ‐1.48]

4.1 Had to have depression at recruitment

31

2256

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐2.06 [‐2.54, ‐1.58]

4.2 Did not have to have depression at recruitment

8

472

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.35 [‐2.35, ‐0.36]

5 Depression (dichotomous) Show forest plot

8

771

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.43 [0.24, 0.77]

5.1 Had to have depression at recruitment

2

288

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.66 [0.30, 1.46]

5.2 Did not have to have depression at recruitment

6

483

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.38 [0.25, 0.59]

6 Anxiety (continuous) Show forest plot

8

413

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.77 [‐1.52, ‐0.02]

6.1 Had to have depression at recruitment

5

271

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.10 [‐2.32, 0.12]

6.2 Did not have to have depression at recruitment

3

142

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.28 [‐0.85, 0.29]

7 Anxiety (dichotomous)

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7.1 Had to have depression at recruitment

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7.2 Did not have to have depression at baseline

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8 Cognition Show forest plot

7

425

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.32 [‐0.23, 0.86]

8.1 Had to have depression at recruitment

5

309

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.48 [‐0.21, 1.17]

8.2 Did not have to have depression at recruitment

2

116

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.08 [‐0.45, 0.28]

9 Death Show forest plot

46

3344

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.76 [0.34, 1.70]

9.1 Had to have depression at recruitment

32

2468

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.53 [0.18, 1.54]

9.2 Did not have to have depression at recruitment

14

876

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.22 [0.36, 4.13]

10 Seizures Show forest plot

7

444

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.67 [0.61, 11.63]

10.1 Had to have depression at recruitment

4

220

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.97 [0.27, 14.55]

10.2 Did not have to have depression at recruitment

3

224

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

3.83 [0.44, 33.53]

11 Gastrointestinal side effects Show forest plot

14

902

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.90 [0.94, 3.85]

11.1 Had to have depression at recruitment

8

523

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.72 [0.58, 5.12]

11.2 Did not have to have depression at recruitment

6

379

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.53 [1.18, 5.42]

12 Leaving the trial early Show forest plot

49

3851

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.02 [0.86, 1.21]

12.1 Had to have depression at recruitment

35

2860

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.97 [0.77, 1.21]

12.2 Did not have to have depression at entry

14

991

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.10 [0.84, 1.44]

13 Bleeding Show forest plot

2

347

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.63 [0.20, 13.05]

13.1 Depression at onset

1

229

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

3.13 [0.13, 76.10]

13.2 No depression at onset

1

118

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.0 [0.06, 15.61]

14 Motor deficits Show forest plot

2

145

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.33 [‐1.22, 0.56]

14.1 No depression at onset

2

145

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.33 [‐1.22, 0.56]

14.2 Depression at onset

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 4. SSRI versus control according to depression at time of recruitment
Comparison 5. SSRI versus control, end of treatment, randomisation: low risk of bias

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Dependent on modified Rankin score (mRS 3 to 5) Show forest plot

2

223

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.81 [0.68, 0.97]

1.1 Fluoxetine

1

112

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.81 [0.68, 0.97]

1.2 Sertraline

1

111

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 Disability Show forest plot

7

325

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.39 [0.15, 0.63]

2.1 Fluoxetine

6

305

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.38 [0.11, 0.66]

2.2 Sertraline

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.3 Citalopram

1

20

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.25 [‐0.63, 1.13]

2.4 Paroxetine

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.5 Escitalopram

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.6 Sertraline or fluoxetine

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3 Neurological deficit score Show forest plot

10

649

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.72 [‐1.11, ‐0.33]

3.1 Fluoxetine

5

362

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.52 [‐0.89, ‐0.15]

3.2 Sertraline

2

108

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.26 [‐0.96, 0.45]

3.3 Citalopram

3

179

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.43 [‐2.25, ‐0.60]

3.4 Paroxetine

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.5 Fluoxetine or sertraline

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4 Depression (continuous data) Show forest plot

10

647

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.17 [‐0.61, 0.28]

4.1 Fluoxetine

6

374

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.38 [‐0.91, 0.16]

4.2 Sertraline

3

253

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.28 [‐0.63, 1.20]

4.3 Citalopram

1

20

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.40 [‐1.29, 0.48]

4.4 Paroxetine

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.5 Fluoxetine or sertraline

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5 Depression (dichotomous data) Show forest plot

3

283

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.50 [0.27, 0.92]

5.1 Fluoxetine

1

67

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.26 [0.06, 1.12]

5.2 Sertraline

1

99

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.77 [0.34, 1.76]

5.3 Citalopram

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.4 Paroxetine

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.5 Escitalopram

1

117

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.38 [0.14, 0.99]

6 Anxiety (continuous data) Show forest plot

3

115

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.40 [‐0.85, 0.05]

6.1 Fluoxetine

3

115

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.40 [‐0.85, 0.05]

6.2 Sertraline

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.3 Citalopram

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.4 Paroxetine

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.5 Escitalopram

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7 Anxiety (dichotomous data)

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8 Cognition (continuous scores end of treatment) Show forest plot

4

223

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.16 [‐0.18, 0.49]

8.1 Fluoxetine

2

55

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.03 [‐0.50, 0.56]

8.2 Sertraline

1

80

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.53 [0.08, 0.98]

8.3 Citalopram

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8.4 Escitalopram

1

88

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.07 [‐0.49, 0.35]

9 Death Show forest plot

13

920

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.06 [0.36, 3.09]

9.1 Fluoxetine

7

452

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.78 [0.14, 4.39]

9.2 Sertraline

4

331

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.91 [0.20, 4.19]

9.3 Citalopram

1

20

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9.4 Paroxetine

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9.5 Escitalopram

1

117

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

4.92 [0.24, 100.25]

9.6 Sertraline or fluoxetine

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10 Seizures Show forest plot

1

118

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

3.0 [0.12, 72.18]

10.1 Fluoxetine

1

118

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

3.0 [0.12, 72.18]

10.2 Sertraline

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10.3 Citalopram

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10.4 Paroxetine

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10.5 Escitalopram

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10.6 Sertraline or fluoxetine

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11 Gastrointestinal side effects Show forest plot

5

363

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.92 [0.98, 3.77]

11.1 Fluoxetine

4

335

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.09 [1.05, 4.18]

11.2 Sertraline

1

28

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.33 [0.01, 7.55]

11.3 Citalopram

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11.4 Paroxetine

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11.5 Escitalopram

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11.6 Sertraline and paroxetine

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12 Bleeding

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.1 Fluoxetine

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.2 Sertraline

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.3 Citalopram

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.4 Paroxetine

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.5 Escitalopram

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.6 Sertraline or fluoxetine

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

13 Change in depression scores between baseline and follow‐up

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

13.1 Sertraline

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

14 Change in cognition between baseline and end of treatment Show forest plot

1

99

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [‐0.39, 0.39]

14.1 Sertraline

1

99

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [‐0.39, 0.39]

15 Leaving the trial before the end of scheduled follow‐up Show forest plot

15

1168

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.99 [0.80, 1.23]

15.1 Fluoxetine

8

552

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.16 [0.72, 1.89]

15.2 Sertraline

5

479

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.95 [0.69, 1.32]

15.3 Citalopram

1

20

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15.4 Paroxetine

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15.5 Sertraline or fluoxetine

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15.6 Escitalopram

1

117

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.38 [0.46, 4.09]

16 Bleeding Show forest plot

1

118

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.0 [0.06, 15.61]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 5. SSRI versus control, end of treatment, randomisation: low risk of bias
Comparison 6. SSRI versus control at end of treatment, concealment of allocation: low risk

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Dependent on modified Rankin score (mRS 3 to 5) Show forest plot

2

223

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.81 [0.68, 0.97]

1.1 Fluoxetine

1

112

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.81 [0.68, 0.97]

1.2 Sertraline

1

111

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 Disability Show forest plot

3

115

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.70 [‐0.73, 2.13]

2.1 Fluoxetine

2

55

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.01 [‐0.54, 0.56]

2.2 Sertraline

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.3 Citalopram

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.4 Paroxetine

1

60

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

2.04 [1.41, 2.67]

2.5 Escitalopram

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.6 Sertraline or fluoxetine

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3 Neurological deficit score Show forest plot

4

289

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.94 [‐1.63, ‐0.26]

3.1 Fluoxetine

3

229

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.68 [‐1.30, ‐0.06]

3.2 Sertraline

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.3 Citalopram

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.4 Paroxetine

1

60

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.76 [‐2.36, ‐1.15]

3.5 Fluoxetine or sertraline

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4 Depression (continuous data) Show forest plot

7

464

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.72 [‐1.52, 0.07]

4.1 Fluoxetine

4

215

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.01 [‐0.54, 0.53]

4.2 Sertraline

1

123

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.16 [‐0.52, 0.19]

4.3 Citalopram

1

66

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.54 [‐1.04, ‐0.05]

4.4 Paroxetine

1

60

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐5.32 [‐6.43, ‐4.21]

4.5 Fluoxetine or sertraline

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5 Depression (dichotomous data) Show forest plot

2

166

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.53 [0.19, 1.49]

5.1 Fluoxetine

1

67

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.26 [0.06, 1.12]

5.2 Sertraline

1

99

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.77 [0.34, 1.76]

5.3 Citalopram

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.4 Paroxetine

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.5 Escitalopram

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6 Anxiety (continuous data) Show forest plot

3

115

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.66 [‐1.74, 0.42]

6.1 Fluoxetine

2

55

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.13 [‐0.66, 0.40]

6.2 Sertraline

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.3 Citalopram

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.4 Paroxetine

1

60

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.67 [‐2.26, ‐1.08]

6.5 Escitalopram

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7 Anxiety (dichotomous data)

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8 Cognition (continuous scores end of treatment) Show forest plot

2

55

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.03 [‐0.50, 0.56]

8.1 Fluoxetine

2

55

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.03 [‐0.50, 0.56]

8.2 Sertraline

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8.3 Citalopram

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8.4 Escitalopram

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9 Death Show forest plot

9

651

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.87 [0.30, 2.50]

9.1 Fluoxetine

5

302

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.78 [0.14, 4.39]

9.2 Sertraline

2

223

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.79 [0.08, 8.19]

9.3 Citalopram

1

66

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.0 [0.15, 6.68]

9.4 Paroxetine

1

60

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9.5 Escitalopram

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9.6 Sertraline or fluoxetine

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10 Seizures Show forest plot

3

244

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

3.93 [0.44, 34.85]

10.1 Fluoxetine

1

118

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

3.0 [0.12, 72.18]

10.2 Sertraline

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10.3 Citalopram

1

66

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

5.0 [0.25, 100.32]

10.4 Paroxetine

1

60

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10.5 Escitalopram

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10.6 Sertraline or fluoxetine

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11 Gastrointestinal side effects Show forest plot

2

178

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.48 [1.06, 5.80]

11.1 Fluoxetine

1

118

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.33 [0.96, 5.66]

11.2 Sertraline

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11.3 Citalopram

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11.4 Paroxetine

1

60

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

5.0 [0.25, 99.95]

11.5 Escitalopram

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11.6 Sertraline and paroxetine

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12 Bleeding

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.1 Fluoxetine

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.2 Sertraline

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.3 Citalopram

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.4 Paroxetine

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.5 Escitalopram

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.6 Sertraline or fluoxetine

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

13 Change in depression scores between baseline and follow‐up

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

13.1 Sertraline

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

14 Change in cognition between baseline and end of treatment Show forest plot

1

99

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [‐0.39, 0.39]

14.1 Sertraline

1

99

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [‐0.39, 0.39]

15 Leaving the trial before the end of scheduled follow‐up Show forest plot

9

673

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.21 [0.75, 1.95]

15.1 Fluoxetine

5

312

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.11 [0.58, 2.11]

15.2 Sertraline

2

234

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.10 [0.47, 2.54]

15.3 Citalopram

1

66

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

6.00 [0.76, 47.14]

15.4 Paroxetine

1

61

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

3.10 [0.13, 73.16]

15.5 Sertraline or fluoxetine

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15.6 Escitalopram

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16 Bleeding

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 6. SSRI versus control at end of treatment, concealment of allocation: low risk
Comparison 7. SSRI versus control at end of treatment, patient/personnel blind: low risk of bias

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Dependent on modified Rankin score (mRS 3 to 5) Show forest plot

2

223

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.81 [0.68, 0.97]

1.1 Fluoxetine

1

112

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.81 [0.68, 0.97]

1.2 Sertraline

1

111

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 Disability Show forest plot

7

297

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.36 [0.12, 0.59]

2.1 Fluoxetine

6

277

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.35 [0.08, 0.61]

2.2 Sertraline

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.3 Citalopram

1

20

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.25 [‐0.63, 1.13]

2.4 Paroxetine

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.5 Escitalopram

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.6 Sertraline or fluoxetine

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3 Neurological deficit score Show forest plot

6

315

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.32 [‐0.55, ‐0.10]

3.1 Fluoxetine

4

267

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.35 [‐0.59, ‐0.11]

3.2 Sertraline

1

28

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.17 [‐0.57, 0.91]

3.3 Citalopram

1

20

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.68 [‐1.59, 0.23]

3.4 Paroxetine

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.5 Fluoxetine or sertraline

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4 Depression (continuous data) Show forest plot

11

646

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.40 [‐0.71, ‐0.09]

4.1 Fluoxetine

8

437

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.40 [‐0.83, 0.03]

4.2 Sertraline

1

123

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.16 [‐0.52, 0.19]

4.3 Citalopram

2

86

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.51 [‐0.94, ‐0.08]

4.4 Paroxetine

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.5 Fluoxetine or sertraline

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5 Depression (dichotomous data) Show forest plot

3

283

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.52 [0.30, 0.90]

5.1 Fluoxetine

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.2 Sertraline

2

166

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.59 [0.28, 1.25]

5.3 Citalopram

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.4 Paroxetine

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.5 Escitalopram

1

117

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.38 [0.14, 0.99]

6 Anxiety (continuous data) Show forest plot

2

55

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.13 [‐0.66, 0.40]

6.1 Fluoxetine

2

55

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.13 [‐0.66, 0.40]

6.2 Sertraline

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.3 Citalopram

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.4 Paroxetine

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.5 Escitalopram

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7 Anxiety (dichotomous data)

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8 Cognition (continuous scores end of treatment) Show forest plot

4

174

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.10 [‐0.39, 0.20]

8.1 Fluoxetine

3

86

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.12 [‐0.55, 0.30]

8.2 Sertraline

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8.3 Citalopram

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8.4 Escitalopram

1

88

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.07 [‐0.49, 0.35]

9 Death Show forest plot

14

865

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.05 [0.41, 2.66]

9.1 Fluoxetine

8

411

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.78 [0.14, 4.39]

9.2 Sertraline

3

251

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.91 [0.20, 4.19]

9.3 Citalopram

2

86

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.0 [0.15, 6.68]

9.4 Paroxetine

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9.5 Escitalopram

1

117

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

4.92 [0.24, 100.25]

9.6 Sertraline or fluoxetine

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10 Seizures Show forest plot

4

250

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.67 [0.61, 11.63]

10.1 Fluoxetine

3

184

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.19 [0.41, 11.85]

10.2 Sertraline

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10.3 Citalopram

1

66

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

5.0 [0.25, 100.32]

10.4 Paroxetine

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10.5 Escitalopram

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10.6 Sertraline or fluoxetine

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11 Gastrointestinal side effects Show forest plot

5

303

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.37 [0.63, 2.98]

11.1 Fluoxetine

4

275

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.48 [0.65, 3.39]

11.2 Sertraline

1

28

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.33 [0.01, 7.55]

11.3 Citalopram

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11.4 Paroxetine

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11.5 Escitalopram

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11.6 Sertraline and paroxetine

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12 Bleeding

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.1 Fluoxetine

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.2 Sertraline

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.3 Citalopram

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.4 Paroxetine

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.5 Escitalopram

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.6 Sertraline or fluoxetine

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

13 Change in depression scores between baseline and follow‐up

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

13.1 Sertraline

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

14 Change in cognition between baseline and end of treatment Show forest plot

1

99

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [‐0.39, 0.39]

14.1 Sertraline

1

99

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [‐0.39, 0.39]

15 Leaving the trial before the end of scheduled follow‐up Show forest plot

16

1111

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.05 [0.82, 1.36]

15.1 Fluoxetine

9

509

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.19 [0.74, 1.92]

15.2 Sertraline

4

399

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.95 [0.69, 1.32]

15.3 Citalopram

2

86

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

6.00 [0.76, 47.14]

15.4 Paroxetine

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15.5 Sertraline or fluoxetine

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15.6 Escitalopram

1

117

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.38 [0.46, 4.09]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 7. SSRI versus control at end of treatment, patient/personnel blind: low risk of bias
Comparison 8. SSRI versus control at end of treatment, outcome assessor blind: low risk of bias

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Dependent on modified Rankin score (mRS 3 to 5) Show forest plot

2

223

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.81 [0.68, 0.97]

1.1 Fluoxetine

1

112

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.81 [0.68, 0.97]

1.2 Sertraline

1

111

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 Disability Show forest plot

4

239

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.87 [0.16, 1.58]

2.1 Fluoxetine

2

159

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.57 [0.24, 0.90]

2.2 Sertraline

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.3 Citalopram

1

20

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.25 [‐0.63, 1.13]

2.4 Paroxetine

1

60

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

2.04 [1.41, 2.67]

2.5 Escitalopram

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.6 Sertraline or fluoxetine

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3 Neurological deficit score Show forest plot

8

640

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.76 [‐1.15, ‐0.38]

3.1 Fluoxetine

4

306

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.41 [‐0.63, ‐0.18]

3.2 Sertraline

1

80

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.56 [‐1.01, ‐0.11]

3.3 Citalopram

1

20

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.68 [‐1.59, 0.23]

3.4 Paroxetine

1

60

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.76 [‐2.36, ‐1.15]

3.5 Fluoxetine or sertraline

1

174

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.40 [‐1.73, ‐1.06]

4 Depression (continuous data) Show forest plot

10

741

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.39 [‐2.10, ‐0.68]

4.1 Fluoxetine

5

390

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.01 [‐1.69, ‐0.34]

4.2 Sertraline

2

203

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.23 [‐0.51, 0.04]

4.3 Citalopram

2

88

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.85 [‐4.65, 0.96]

4.4 Paroxetine

1

60

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐5.32 [‐6.43, ‐4.21]

4.5 Fluoxetine or sertraline

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5 Depression (dichotomous data) Show forest plot

1

117

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.38 [0.14, 0.99]

5.1 Fluoxetine

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.2 Sertraline

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.3 Citalopram

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.4 Paroxetine

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.5 Escitalopram

1

117

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.38 [0.14, 0.99]

6 Anxiety (continuous data) Show forest plot

1

60

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.67 [‐2.26, ‐1.08]

6.1 Fluoxetine

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.2 Sertraline

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.3 Citalopram

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.4 Paroxetine

1

60

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.67 [‐2.26, ‐1.08]

6.5 escitalopram

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7 Anxiety (dichotomous data)

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8 Cognition (continuous scores end of treatment) Show forest plot

2

168

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.21 [‐0.36, 0.78]

8.1 Fluoxetine

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8.2 Sertraline

1

80

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.51 [0.06, 0.95]

8.3 Citalopram

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8.4 Escitalopram

1

88

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.07 [‐0.49, 0.35]

9 Death Show forest plot

11

833

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.13 [0.25, 4.97]

9.1 Fluoxetine

5

343

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.28 [0.16, 10.11]

9.2 Sertraline

2

203

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.20 [0.01, 4.02]

9.3 Citalopram

2

110

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9.4 Paroxetine

1

60

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9.5 Escitalopram

1

117

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

4.92 [0.24, 100.25]

9.6 Sertraline or fluoxetine

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10 Seizures Show forest plot

3

249

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

3.0 [0.12, 72.18]

10.1 Fluoxetine

2

189

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

3.0 [0.12, 72.18]

10.2 Sertraline

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10.3 Citalopram

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10.4 Paroxetine

1

60

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10.5 Escitalopram

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10.6 Sertraline or fluoxetine

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11 Gastrointestinal side effects Show forest plot

5

367

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.74 [0.87, 3.49]

11.1 Fluoxetine

3

279

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.77 [0.81, 3.85]

11.2 Sertraline

1

28

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.33 [0.01, 7.55]

11.3 Citalopram

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11.4 Paroxetine

1

60

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

5.0 [0.25, 99.95]

11.5 Escitalopram

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11.6 Sertraline and paroxetine

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12 Bleeding

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.1 Fluoxetine

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.2 Sertraline

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.3 Citalopram

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.4 Paroxetine

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.5 Escitalopram

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.6 Sertraline or fluoxetine

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

13 Change in depression scores between baseline and follow‐up

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

13.1 Sertraline

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

14 Change in cognition between baseline and end of treatment

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

14.1 Sertraline

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15 Leaving the trial before the end of scheduled follow‐up Show forest plot

12

947

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.94 [0.71, 1.24]

15.1 Fluoxetine

6

456

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.07 [0.65, 1.76]

15.2 Sertraline

2

203

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.79 [0.53, 1.18]

15.3 Citalopram

2

110

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.0 [0.48, 2.07]

15.4 Paroxetine

1

61

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

3.10 [0.13, 73.16]

15.5 Sertraline or fluoxetine

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15.6 Escitalopram

1

117

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.38 [0.46, 4.09]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 8. SSRI versus control at end of treatment, outcome assessor blind: low risk of bias
Comparison 9. SSRI versus control at end of treatment, incomplete outcome data: low risk of bias

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Dependent on modified Rankin score (mRS 3 to 5) Show forest plot

2

223

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.81 [0.68, 0.97]

1.1 Fluoxetine

1

112

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.81 [0.68, 0.97]

1.2 Sertraline

1

111

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 Disability Show forest plot

10

598

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.77 [0.22, 1.33]

2.1 Fluoxetine

6

276

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.22 [‐0.12, 0.55]

2.2 Sertraline

1

130

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.38 [0.99, 1.76]

2.3 Citalopram

1

60

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

2.67 [1.97, 3.38]

2.4 Paroxetine

2

132

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

1.28 [‐0.29, 2.86]

2.5 Escitalopram

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.6 Sertraline or fluoxetine

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3 Neurological deficit score Show forest plot

13

999

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.12 [‐1.55, ‐0.68]

3.1 Fluoxetine

7

537

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.14 [‐1.78, ‐0.49]

3.2 Sertraline

2

108

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.26 [‐0.96, 0.45]

3.3 Citalopram

1

60

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐2.27 [‐2.93, ‐1.61]

3.4 Paroxetine

3

294

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.29 [‐2.09, ‐0.49]

3.5 Fluoxetine or sertraline

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4 Depression (continuous data) Show forest plot

20

1590

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐2.16 [‐2.77, ‐1.55]

4.1 Fluoxetine

10

637

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐2.65 [‐3.88, ‐1.41]

4.2 Sertraline

3

333

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.64 [‐1.41, 0.14]

4.3 Citalopram

2

126

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.67 [‐3.89, 0.56]

4.4 Paroxetine

6

494

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐2.50 [‐3.37, ‐1.63]

4.5 Fluoxetine or sertraline

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5 Depression (dichotomous data) Show forest plot

6

486

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.41 [0.26, 0.65]

5.1 Fluoxetine

3

203

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.25 [0.11, 0.57]

5.2 Sertraline

2

166

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.59 [0.28, 1.25]

5.3 Citalopram

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.4 Paroxetine

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.5 Escitalopram

1

117

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.38 [0.14, 0.99]

6 Anxiety (continuous data) Show forest plot

5

249

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐1.03 [‐2.09, 0.04]

6.1 Fluoxetine

3

115

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.40 [‐0.85, 0.05]

6.2 Sertraline

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.3 Citalopram

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.4 Paroxetine

2

134

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐2.16 [‐5.83, 1.51]

6.5 Escitalopram

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7 Anxiety (dichotomous data)

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8 Cognition (continuous scores end of treatment) Show forest plot

5

254

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.07 [‐0.26, 0.40]

8.1 Fluoxetine

3

86

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.12 [‐0.55, 0.30]

8.2 Sertraline

1

80

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.53 [0.08, 0.98]

8.3 Citalopram

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8.4 Escitalopram

1

88

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.07 [‐0.49, 0.35]

9 Death Show forest plot

28

2156

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.99 [0.37, 2.64]

9.1 Fluoxetine

15

958

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.55 [0.07, 4.34]

9.2 Sertraline

5

461

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.91 [0.20, 4.19]

9.3 Citalopram

2

126

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.0 [0.15, 6.68]

9.4 Paroxetine

6

494

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9.5 Escitalopram

1

117

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

4.92 [0.24, 100.25]

9.6 Sertraline or fluoxetine

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10 Seizures Show forest plot

5

332

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.22 [0.41, 12.06]

10.1 Fluoxetine

3

212

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.52 [0.20, 11.80]

10.2 Sertraline

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10.3 Citalopram

1

66

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

5.0 [0.25, 100.32]

10.4 Paroxetine

1

54

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10.5 Escitalopram

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10.6 Sertraline or fluoxetine

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11 Gastrointestinal side effects Show forest plot

8

507

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.67 [0.56, 4.97]

11.1 Fluoxetine

6

425

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.43 [0.47, 4.36]

11.2 Sertraline

1

28

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.33 [0.01, 7.55]

11.3 Citalopram

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11.4 Paroxetine

1

54

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

19.00 [1.16, 310.94]

11.5 Escitalopram

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11.6 Sertraline and paroxetine

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12 Bleeding Show forest plot

1

54

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

19.00 [1.16, 310.94]

12.1 Fluoxetine

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.2 Sertraline

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.3 Citalopram

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.4 Paroxetine

1

54

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

19.00 [1.16, 310.94]

12.5 Escitalopram

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.6 Sertraline or fluoxetine

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

13 Change in depression scores between baseline and follow‐up

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

13.1 Sertraline

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

14 Change in cognition between baseline and end of treatment Show forest plot

1

99

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [‐0.39, 0.39]

14.1 Sertraline

1

99

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [‐0.39, 0.39]

15 Leaving the trial before the end of scheduled follow‐up Show forest plot

28

2130

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.51 [1.02, 2.23]

15.1 Fluoxetine

13

784

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.62 [0.75, 3.51]

15.2 Sertraline

6

609

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.46 [0.79, 2.72]

15.3 Citalopram

2

126

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

6.00 [0.76, 47.14]

15.4 Paroxetine

6

494

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15.5 Sertraline or fluoxetine

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15.6 Escitalopram

1

117

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.38 [0.46, 4.09]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 9. SSRI versus control at end of treatment, incomplete outcome data: low risk of bias
Comparison 10. SSRI versus control at end of treatment, selective reporting: low risk

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Dependent on modified Rankin score (mRS 3 to 5) Show forest plot

2

223

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.81 [0.68, 0.97]

1.1 Fluoxetine

1

112

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.81 [0.68, 0.97]

1.2 Sertraline

1

111

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 Disability Show forest plot

4

118

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.11 [‐0.26, 0.47]

2.1 Fluoxetine

4

118

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.11 [‐0.26, 0.47]

2.2 Sertraline

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.3 Citalopram

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.4 Paroxetine

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.5 Escitalopram

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.6 Sertraline or fluoxetine

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3 Neurological deficit score Show forest plot

3

172

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.20 [‐0.50, 0.10]

3.1 Fluoxetine

2

144

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.27 [‐0.60, 0.06]

3.2 Sertraline

1

28

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.17 [‐0.57, 0.91]

3.3 Citalopram

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.4 Paroxetine

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.5 Fluoxetine or sertraline

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4 Depression (continuous data) Show forest plot

6

294

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.22 [‐0.63, 0.18]

4.1 Fluoxetine

5

228

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.13 [‐0.64, 0.37]

4.2 Sertraline

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.3 Citalopram

1

66

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.54 [‐1.04, ‐0.05]

4.4 Paroxetine

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.5 Fluoxetine or sertraline

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5 Depression (dichotomous data) Show forest plot

3

283

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.52 [0.30, 0.90]

5.1 Fluoxetine

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.2 Sertraline

2

166

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.59 [0.28, 1.25]

5.3 Citalopram

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.4 Paroxetine

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.5 Escitalopram

1

117

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.38 [0.14, 0.99]

6 Anxiety (continuous data) Show forest plot

2

55

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.13 [‐0.66, 0.40]

6.1 Fluoxetine

2

55

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.13 [‐0.66, 0.40]

6.2 Sertraline

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.3 Citalopram

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.4 Paroxetine

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.5 Escitalopram

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7 Anxiety (dichotomous data)

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8 Cognition (continuous scores end of treatment) Show forest plot

3

86

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.12 [‐0.55, 0.30]

8.1 Fluoxetine

3

86

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.12 [‐0.55, 0.30]

8.2 Sertraline

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8.3 Citalopram

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9 Death Show forest plot

9

568

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.20 [0.43, 3.37]

9.1 Fluoxetine

5

257

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.55 [0.07, 4.34]

9.2 Sertraline

2

128

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.54 [0.26, 9.07]

9.3 Citalopram

1

66

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.0 [0.15, 6.68]

9.4 Paroxetine

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9.5 Escitalopram

1

117

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

4.92 [0.24, 100.25]

9.6 Sertraline or fluoxetine

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10 Seizures Show forest plot

4

250

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.67 [0.61, 11.63]

10.1 Fluoxetine

3

184

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.19 [0.41, 11.85]

10.2 Sertraline

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10.3 Citalopram

1

66

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

5.0 [0.25, 100.32]

10.4 Paroxetine

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10.5 Escitalopram

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10.6 Sertraline or fluoxetine

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11 Gastrointestinal side effects Show forest plot

4

213

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.35 [0.42, 4.29]

11.1 Fluoxetine

3

185

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.60 [0.44, 5.77]

11.2 Sertraline

1

28

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.33 [0.01, 7.55]

11.3 Citalopram

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11.4 Paroxetine

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11.5 Escitalopram

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11.6 Sertraline and paroxetine

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12 Bleeding

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.1 Fluoxetine

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.2 Sertraline

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.3 Citalopram

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.4 Paroxetine

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.5 Escitalopram

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.6 Sertraline or fluoxetine

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

13 Change in depression scores between baseline and follow‐up

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

13.1 Sertraline

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

14 Change in cognition between baseline and end of treatment Show forest plot

1

99

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [‐0.39, 0.39]

14.1 Sertraline

1

99

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [‐0.39, 0.39]

15 Leaving the trial before the end of scheduled follow‐up Show forest plot

10

714

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.32 [0.87, 1.99]

15.1 Fluoxetine

5

255

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.55 [0.70, 3.45]

15.2 Sertraline

3

276

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.17 [0.63, 2.16]

15.3 Citalopram

1

66

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

6.00 [0.76, 47.14]

15.4 Paroxetine

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15.5 Sertraline or fluoxetine

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15.6 Escitalopram

1

117

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.38 [0.46, 4.09]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 10. SSRI versus control at end of treatment, selective reporting: low risk