Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Perioperative enhanced recovery programmes for gynaecological cancer patients

Esta versión no es la más reciente

ver la versión actual 15 marzo 2022

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008239.pub3Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 12 diciembre 2012see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:

  1. Grupo Cochrane de Cáncer ginecológico, neurooncología y otros cánceres

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2014 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • DongHao Lu

    Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

  • Xuan Wang

    2001, 5, Clinical Department, West China University of Medical Sciences, Chengdu, China

  • Gang Shi

    Correspondencia a: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

    [email protected]

    [email protected]

Contributions of authors

Donghao Lv: drafting of protocol and review; search for trials; data entry into RevMan; extraction of data; selection of trials for inclusion/exclusion.
Huan Song: extraction of data; selection of trials for inclusion/exclusion; obtaining copies of trial reports; extraction of data.
Gang Shi: all correspondence; drafting of protocol and review; interpretation of results.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, China.

External sources

  • No sources of support supplied

Declarations of interest

Authors declare that all the analyses and interpretation reflect the opinions of the authors; no pharmaceutical company was involved in the analysis or interpretation of data, or in the writing of this systematic review.

Acknowledgements

We thank Joey Kwong for language support, Chris Williams and Jo Morrison for clinical and editorial advice, Jane Hayes for designing the search strategy, Lesley Smith for methodological advice, and Gail Quinn and Clare Jess for their contribution to the editorial process.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2022 Mar 15

Perioperative enhanced recovery programmes for women with gynaecological cancers

Review

Janita Pak Chun Chau, Xu Liu, Suzanne Hoi Shan Lo, Wai Tong Chien, Sze Ki Hui, Kai Chow Choi, Jie Zhao

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008239.pub5

2015 Mar 19

Perioperative enhanced recovery programmes for gynaecological cancer patients

Review

DongHao Lu, Xuan Wang, Gang Shi

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008239.pub4

2012 Dec 12

Perioperative enhanced recovery programmes for gynaecological cancer patients

Review

DongHao Lu, Xuan Wang, Gang Shi

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008239.pub3

2010 Jun 16

Perioperative enhanced recovery programmes for gynaecological cancer patients

Review

DongHao Lv, Xuan Wang, Gang Shi

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008239.pub2

2010 Jan 20

Perioperative enhanced recovery programmes for gynaecological cancer patients

Protocol

DongHao Lv, Huan Song, Gang Shi

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008239

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.