Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Perioperative enhanced recovery programmes for gynaecological cancer patients

This is not the most recent version

view the current version 15 March 2022

Information

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008239.pub3Copy DOI
Database:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Version published:
  1. 12 December 2012see what's new
Type:
  1. Intervention
Stage:
  1. Review
Cochrane Editorial Group:

  1. Cochrane Gynaecological, Neuro-oncology and Orphan Cancer Group

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2014 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Article metrics

Altmetric:

Cited by:

Cited 0 times via Crossref Cited-by Linking

Collapse

Authors

  • DongHao Lu

    Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

  • Xuan Wang

    2001, 5, Clinical Department, West China University of Medical Sciences, Chengdu, China

  • Gang Shi

    Correspondence to: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

    [email protected]

    [email protected]

Contributions of authors

Donghao Lv: drafting of protocol and review; search for trials; data entry into RevMan; extraction of data; selection of trials for inclusion/exclusion.
Huan Song: extraction of data; selection of trials for inclusion/exclusion; obtaining copies of trial reports; extraction of data.
Gang Shi: all correspondence; drafting of protocol and review; interpretation of results.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, China.

External sources

  • No sources of support supplied

Declarations of interest

Authors declare that all the analyses and interpretation reflect the opinions of the authors; no pharmaceutical company was involved in the analysis or interpretation of data, or in the writing of this systematic review.

Acknowledgements

We thank Joey Kwong for language support, Chris Williams and Jo Morrison for clinical and editorial advice, Jane Hayes for designing the search strategy, Lesley Smith for methodological advice, and Gail Quinn and Clare Jess for their contribution to the editorial process.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2022 Mar 15

Perioperative enhanced recovery programmes for women with gynaecological cancers

Review

Janita Pak Chun Chau, Xu Liu, Suzanne Hoi Shan Lo, Wai Tong Chien, Sze Ki Hui, Kai Chow Choi, Jie Zhao

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008239.pub5

2015 Mar 19

Perioperative enhanced recovery programmes for gynaecological cancer patients

Review

DongHao Lu, Xuan Wang, Gang Shi

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008239.pub4

2012 Dec 12

Perioperative enhanced recovery programmes for gynaecological cancer patients

Review

DongHao Lu, Xuan Wang, Gang Shi

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008239.pub3

2010 Jun 16

Perioperative enhanced recovery programmes for gynaecological cancer patients

Review

DongHao Lv, Xuan Wang, Gang Shi

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008239.pub2

2010 Jan 20

Perioperative enhanced recovery programmes for gynaecological cancer patients

Protocol

DongHao Lv, Huan Song, Gang Shi

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008239

PICOs

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

The PICO model is widely used and taught in evidence-based health care as a strategy for formulating questions and search strategies and for characterizing clinical studies or meta-analyses. PICO stands for four different potential components of a clinical question: Patient, Population or Problem; Intervention; Comparison; Outcome.

See more on using PICO in the Cochrane Handbook.