Entrenamiento de las aptitudes sociales para el Trastorno de Hiperactividad y Déficit de Atención (THDA) en niños de cinco a 18 años de edad
Información
- DOI:
- https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008223.pub2Copiar DOI
- Base de datos:
-
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
- Versión publicada:
-
- 07 diciembre 2011see what's new
- Tipo:
-
- Intervention
- Etapa:
-
- Review
- Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
-
Grupo Cochrane de Problemas de desarrollo, psicosociales y de aprendizaje
- Copyright:
-
- Copyright © 2011 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Cifras del artículo
Altmetric:
Citado por:
Autores
Contributions of authors
Ole Jakob Storebø: development of protocol, selection of trials, data extraction, risk of bias assessment of studies, data analysis, contact person, development of the final review.
Maria Skoog: development of protocol, data extraction, risk of bias assessment of trials, development of the final review.
Dorte Damm: development of protocol, selection of trials.
Per Hove Thomsen: selection of trials, development of the final review.
Erik Simonsen: risk of bias assessment of trials, development of the final review.
Christian Gluud: development of protocol, advising on statistical methods and analysis, development of the final review.
Sources of support
Internal sources
-
No sources of support supplied
External sources
-
CopenhagenTrial Unit, Denmark.
-
Research Library, Unit for Psychiatric Research, Region Zealand, Roskilde, Denmark.
Declarations of interest
Christian Gluud, Maria Skoog, Erik Simonsen, and Per Hove Thomsen have been involved in the design of a trial that is potentially eligible for inclusion in this review. Ole Jakob Storebø is lead investigator on the trial and Erik Simonsen is the sub‐investigator. Details of the trial can be found at ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT 00937469).
Per Hove Thomsen has received fees for lecturing on behalf of the pharmacological companies: NOVARTIS and UCB and lecturing and consulting on behalf of Eli‐Lilly. He also serves on the advisory board of Eli‐Lilly.
Acknowledgements
Kirsten Buch Rasmussen for her support in the searching process.
Connie Enevoldsen for her support in the searching process.
We would like to acknowledge the contribution from Trygfonden (Denmark) for their financial support completion of this review.
Version history
| Published | Title | Stage | Authors | Version |
| 2019 Jun 21 | Social skills training for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children aged 5 to 18 years | Review | Ole Jakob Storebø, Mette Elmose Andersen, Maria Skoog, Signe Joost Hansen, Erik Simonsen, Nadia Pedersen, Britta Tendal, Henriette E. Callesen, Erlend Faltinsen, Christian Gluud | |
| 2011 Dec 07 | Social skills training for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in children aged 5 to 18 years | Review | Ole Jakob Storebø, Maria Skoog, Dorte Damm, Per Hove Thomsen, Erik Simonsen, Christian Gluud | |
| 2010 Jan 20 | Social skills training for children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) | Protocol | Ole Jakob Storebø, Maria Skoog, Dorte Damm, Per Hove Thomsen, Erik Simonsen, Christian Gluud | |
Differences between protocol and review
See Table 1.
| Protocol | Review |
| Outcomes: In the protocol we stated that we would measure the two primary and the first two of secondary outcomes at short term (up to six months), medium term (six to 12 months), and long term (more than 12 months). In the protocol we did not prespecify the most important comparisons for the 'Summary of findings' table. | In the review this has been changed to at the end of treatment and at the longest follow‐up. We have added definition of adverse outcomes according to the International Committee of Harmonization guidelines (ICH 1996). In the review we used our two primary outcomes (teacher‐rated social‐skills and general behaviour) and the first secondary outcome (ADHD symptoms) in the 'Summary of findings' table. |
| Subgroup analysis: In the protocol we planned to perform subgroup analysis according to the following categories: | In the review it was not possible to perform subgroup analysis 1, 2, 5, and 6 due to lack of sufficient data in the included trials. |
| Risk of bias: In the protocol we had not planned to evaluate blinding of participants and personnel. In the protocol we stated that we would only use trials with low risk (or lower risk) of bias in the meta‐analysis. | In the review we also assessed the blinding of participants and personnel. In the review we changed this decision to restrict meta‐analysis to trials with comparable risk of bias (for example, all low risk, all unclear, or all the trials are at high risk of bias), and perform sensitivity analyses accordingly. |
| Sensitivity analysis: In the protocol we stated that we would repeat the analysis taking different methods used to handle the missing data into consideration. | In the review we did not perform this due to lack of necessary data. We have analysed the data 'as reported'. |
Notes
An administrative error was made in the first published version of the protocol and important information about the declaration of interest of the authors was not included in the publication. This has now been rectified.
