Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Ginseng para la cognición

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007769.pub2Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 08 diciembre 2010see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Demencia y trastornos cognitivos

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2010 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • JinSong Geng

    Evidence‐based Medicine Center, Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong, China

  • JianCheng Dong

    Correspondencia a: Evidence‐based Medicine Center, Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong, China

    [email protected]

  • Hengjian Ni

    Evidence‐based Medicine Center, Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong, China

  • Myeong Soo Lee

    Division of Standard Research, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine, Daejeon, Korea, South

  • Taixiang Wu

    Chinese Cochrane Centre, Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, Chinese Evidence‐Based Medicine Centre, INCLEN Resource and Training Centre, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

  • Kui Jiang

    Evidence‐based Medicine Centre, Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong, China

  • GuoHua Wang

    Institute of Nautical Medicine, Nantong University, Nantong, China

  • Ai Ling Zhou

    Department of Pathophysiology, Medical School of Nantong University, Jiangsu, China

  • Reem Malouf

    Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group, Oxford, UK

Contributions of authors

Geng JS ‐ All correspondence; drafting protocol and review versions; search for trials; selection of trials for inclusion/exclusion; extraction of data; interpretation of data analyses; updating review.

Dong JC ‐ Drafting review versions; extraction of data; updating review.

Ni HJ ‐ Obtaining copies of trial reports; updating review.

Wu TX ‐ Methodology expert; arbiter of selection of trials for inclusion/exclusion.

Jiang K ‐ Search for trials; selection of trials for inclusion/exclusion; updating review.

Zhou AL ‐ Updating review.

Wang GH ‐ Interpretation of data analyses; entry of data; updating review.

Contact Editor ‐ Krista Lanctot

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • Evidence based medicine centre, Medical School of Nantong University, Jiangsu, China.

External sources

  • Chinese Cochrane Center, China.

Declarations of interest

None known.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful for the technical assistance and editorial support from the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group. We also thank Professor YouPing Li at the Chinese Cochrane Center for her guidance on our work. We acknowledge the contributions of the following consumers: Ann E Fonfa, Tracey Lloyd and Yusra Adel Badr. We are grateful to Emilio Perucca, Jesper Sonne, David Kennedy, Jonathon Reay and Keith A. Wesnes for providing detailed information of included studies. We sincerely thank peers and consumers for comments on this review.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2010 Dec 08

Ginseng for cognition

Review

JinSong Geng, JianCheng Dong, Hengjian Ni, Myeong Soo Lee, Taixiang Wu, Kui Jiang, GuoHua Wang, Ai Ling Zhou, Reem Malouf

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007769.pub2

2009 Apr 15

Ginseng for cognition

Protocol

JinSong Geng, JianCheng Dong, Hengjian Ni, Taixiang Wu, Kui Jiang, GuoHua Wang

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007769

Differences between protocol and review

The inclusion of two‐period cross‐over studies was not specified in the previously published protocol. This change in methods was made to bring the methods in line with the recommendations in the latest edition of the Cochrane Handbook and to ensure that potentially valuable information was not lost from the review.

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.