Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

The use of propofol for procedural sedation in emergency departments

Esta versión no es la más reciente

ver la versión actual 29 julio 2015

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007399Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 08 octubre 2008see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Protocol
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:

  1. Grupo Cochrane de Anestesia

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2013 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Abel Wakai

    Correspondencia a: Emergency Care Research Unit (ECRU), HRB Centre For Primary Care Research, Division of Population Health Sciences (PHS), Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin 2, Ireland

    [email protected]

    [email protected]

  • Paul Staunton

    Department of Emergency Medicine, St. James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland

  • Fergal Cummins

    Department of Emergency Medicine, St. James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland

  • Ronan O'Sullivan

    National Children's Research Centre, Our Lady's Children's Hospital Crumlin, Dublin, Ireland

    Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland

Contributions of authors

Conceiving the review: Abel Wakai (AW)

Co‐ordinating the review: AW

Undertaking manual searches: AW and Ronan O'Sullivan (RO'S)

Screening search results: AW, Fergal Cummins (FC) and RO'S

Organizing retrieval of papers: AW

Screening retrieved papers against inclusion criteria: AW, FC and RO'S

Appraising quality of papers: AW, FC and RO'S

Abstracting data from papers: AW, FC and RO'S

Writing to authors of papers for additional information: AW

Providing additional data about papers: AW and RO'S 

Obtaining and screening data on unpublished studies: AW and RO'S

Data management for the review: AW

Entering data into Review Manager (RevMan 5.1): AW and FC

RevMan statistical data: AW and FC

Other statistical analysis not using RevMan: AW

Double entry of data: (data entered by person one: AW; data entered by person two:FC)

Interpretation of data: AW and FC

Statistical inferences: AW and FC

Writing the review: AW

Securing funding for the review: N/A

Performing previous work that was the foundation of the present study: AW

Guarantor for the review (one author): AW

Person responsible for reading and checking review before submission: AW

 

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • Department of Emergency Medicine, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

External sources

  • Higher Specialist Training Scheme in Emergency Medicine, Ireland.

Declarations of interest

None known

Acknowledgements

As part of the pre‐publication editorial process, this protocol has been commented on by a content editor and five peer reviewers (who are external to the editorial team), one or more members of the Cochrane Consumer Network’s international panel of consumers and the Anaesthesia Group’s Trials Search Co‐ordinator.

We would like to thank Harald Herkner, Simon Brown, Wilhelm Ruppen, Michael Beach, Simon Carley, Michael Ragg, Kathie Godfrey, Amy Woodruffe and Nete Villebro for their help and editorial advice during the preparation of this protocol.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2015 Jul 29

The use of propofol for procedural sedation in emergency departments

Review

Abel Wakai, Carol Blackburn, Aileen McCabe, Emilia Reece, Ger O'Connor, John Glasheen, Paul Staunton, John Cronin, Christopher Sampson, Siobhan C McCoy, Ronan O'Sullivan, Fergal Cummins

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007399.pub2

2008 Oct 08

The use of propofol for procedural sedation in emergency departments

Protocol

Abel Wakai, Paul Staunton, Fergal Cummins, Ronan O'Sullivan

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007399

Keywords

MeSH

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) Keywords

Medical Subject Headings Check Words

Adolescent; Adult; Humans; Middle Aged;

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.