Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Ultrasound guidance for peripheral nerve blockade

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006459.pub2Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 07 octubre 2009see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Anestesia

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2011 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Kevin J Walker

    Correspondencia a: Department of Anaesthetics, Ayr Hospital, Ayr, UK

    [email protected]

    [email protected]

  • Ken McGrattan

    Department of Anaesthetics, Royal Preston Hospital, Preston, Lancashire, UK

  • Kristine Aas‐Eng

    Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway

  • Andrew F Smith

    Department of Anaesthetics, Royal Lancaster Infirmary, Lancaster, UK

Contributions of authors

Conceiving the review: Andrew F Smith (AFS)
Co‐ordinating the review: AFS
Undertaking manual searches: Kristine Aas‐Eng (KAE)
Screening search results: KAE, Ken McGrattan (KMcG), Kevin J Walker (KJW)
Organizing retrieval of papers: KAE, KMcG, KJW
Screening retrieved papers against inclusion criteria: KAE, KMcG, KJW
Appraising quality of papers: KMcG, KJW
Abstracting data from papers: KMcG, KJW
Writing to authors of papers for additional information: KMcG
Providing additional data about papers: KMcG
Obtaining and screening data on unpublished studies: KMcG
Data management for the review: KJW
Entering data into Review Manager (RevMan 5.0): KJW
Analysis of data: KMcG, KJW
Interpretation of data: KMcG, KJW, AFS
Writing the review: KJW, KMcG, AFS
Guarantor for the review (one author): AFS

Declarations of interest

None known

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Dr Mathew Zacharias (content editor), Dr Marialena Trivella (statistical editor), Dr Giorgio Danelli, Dr Vincent Chan (peer reviewers) and Sandra Oliveira (Cochrane Consumer Network) for their help and editorial advice during the preparation of this review.

We would also like to thank Dr Mathew Zacharias, Dr Geert Jan van Geffen, Dr Andrea Casati and Kathie Godfrey for their help and editorial advice during the preparation of the protocol for the review; and Dr McCartney, Dr Dhir, Dr Marhofer and Dr Danelli for additional information provided.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2015 Sep 11

Ultrasound guidance for upper and lower limb blocks

Review

Sharon R Lewis, Anastasia Price, Kevin J Walker, Ken McGrattan, Andrew F Smith

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006459.pub3

2009 Oct 07

Ultrasound guidance for peripheral nerve blockade

Review

Kevin J Walker, Ken McGrattan, Kristine Aas‐Eng, Andrew F Smith

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006459.pub2

2009 Jul 08

Ultrasound guidance for peripheral nerve blockade

Protocol

Kevin J Walker, Ken McGrattan, Kristine Aas‐Eng, Andrew F. Smith

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006459

Differences between protocol and review

One secondary outcome added: onset time of block.

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.