Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Methodological quality graph: review authors' judgements about each methodological quality item presented as percentages across all included studies.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Methodological quality graph: review authors' judgements about each methodological quality item presented as percentages across all included studies.

Methodological quality summary: review authors' judgements about each methodological quality item for each included study.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

Methodological quality summary: review authors' judgements about each methodological quality item for each included study.

Searching results
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 3

Searching results

Table 1. Block success

Study

Comparison

Complete Block

Supplemented Block

Failed Block

Comments

Casati 2007a

Axillary
(multi‐injection US versus multi‐injection PNS)

US: 29 (96.6%)
PNS: 27 (93.1%)

P not stated

US: 1 (3%)
PNS: 2 (6%)
P =0.61

US: 0
PNS: 0

Partial block: >100µg fentanyl; failed block >200µg
2 PNS patients with partial block also required propofol 2‐3 mg/kg/hr

Chan 2007

Axillary
(multi‐injection US versus multi‐injection PNS)

US: 61 (95%)
PNS: 53 (85.5%)
P=0.07

US: 2 (3.1%)
PNS: 8 (12.9%)

P not stated

US: 1 (1.6%)
PNS: 1 (1.6%)

P not stated

Block supplement/GA at discretion of attending doctor

Axillary (multi‐injection US+PNS versus multi‐injection PNS)

US +PNS: 57 (92%)
PNS: 53 (85.5%)
P=0.26

US+PNS: 2 (3.2%)
PNS: 8 (12.9%)

P not stated

US+PNS: 3 (4.8%)
PNS: 1 (1.6%)

P not stated

Danelli 2009

Popliteal fossa sciatic (multiple injection PNS vs US)

US: 16 (72%)PNS: 15 (68%)

P =1.0

US:6 (27%)

PNS: 4 (18%)

P =0.719

US=0

PNS= 4 (18%)

P =0.116

Dhir 2008

Infraclavicular brachial plexus (catheter)

a. US versus PNS (non‐stim catheter) 

US: 22/23 (96%)

PNS: 13/22 (59%)

P value not clear

US: 1/23 (4%)

PNS: 8/22 (36%)

P value not clear

US: 0

PNS: 1/22 (5%)

P value not clear

Significance values given but unclear which comparisons they refer to

b. US versus PNS (stim catheter)

US:22/23 (96%)

PNS: 11/19 (58%)

P value not clear

US: 1/23 (4%)

PNS: 7/19 (37%)

P value not clear

US: 0

PNS: 1/19 (5%)

P value not clear

Domingo‐Triado 2007

Lateral midfemoral sciatic block (single injection US+PNS versus single injection PNS)

US+PNS: 29 (96.7%)
PNS: 28 (93.5%)

P not stated

Sedation for surgery‐

US+PNS: 0
PNS: 7 (22.6%)

Sedation for tourniquet‐
US+PNS: 2 (6.7%)
PNS: 7 (22.6%)

P not stated

US+PNS: 1 (3.3%)
PNS: 2 (6.5%)

P not stated

If sensory block partial sedation given for surgery

Intolerance to tourniquet initially treated with sedation and if failed spinal

Overall, 14 patients (45%) sedated in PNS group

Dufour 2008

Popliteal fossa sciatic (multiple injection PNS versus US+PNS)

US+PNS:20/26 (77%)

PNS: 20/25 (80%)

P not stated

US+PNS: 6/26 (23%)

PNS:5/25 (20%)

P not stated

No GA either group

Block testing at 30 min but surgery at 45‐75 min

Reasons given for sedation‐

US+PNS: Pain 2; tourniquet 2; anxiety 2

PNS: Pain 2; tourniquet 1; anxiety 2

Kapral 2008

Interscalene brachial plexus (PNS versus US)

US:79/80 (98.8%)

PNS: 73/80 (91.3%)

P<0.01

US:0

PNS:0

US:1/80 (1.2%)

PNS: 7/80 (8.7%)

P not stated

Liu 2005

Axillary (single injection US versus double injection PNS)

US: 25 (83%)
PNS: 27 (90%)

P=ns

US: 4 (13%)
PNS 3 (10%)

P=ns

US: 1(3%)
PNS: 0

P=ns

Axillary (double injection US versus double injection PNS)

US: 27 (90%)
PNS: 27 (90%)

P=ns

US: 3 (10%)
PNS: 3 (10%)

P=ns

US: 0
PNS: 0

Macaire 2008

Wrist block (median and ulnar) (US versus PNS)

US: 28/30 (93%)

PNS: 27/29(93%)

P=ns

US: 2/30 (7%)

PNS: 2/29 (7%)

P=ns

US: 0

PNS: 0

Perlas 2008

Popliteal fossa sciatic (US versus PNS)

US: 34/37 (92%)

PNS: 25/33 (76%)

P not stated

US: 0

PNS: 0

US: 3 (8%)

PNS 8 (24%)

P=0.06

Study used assessment of sensory and motor block as primary outcome. Numbers for surgical block generated from conversion to GA rate. All complete blocks appeared to have surgical anaesthesia without supplementation despite lack of full sensory block

Sauter 2008

Infraclavicular brachial plexus (US versus PNS)

US: 38 (95%)

PNS: 35 (87.5%)

P=ns

US: 2 (5%)

PNS: 2 (5%)

P=ns

US: 0

PNS: 3 (7.5%)

P=ns

One block PNS group inadequate at 30 min assessment but sufficient at 45 min and included as complete block

One patient PNS group failed due to inability to obtain any PNS response. Patient received successful US guided block (included as failed block)

Sites 2006

Axillary (multi‐injection US versus transarterial)

US: 23 (82.1%)
TA: 15 (53.6%)

P not stated

US: 5 (17.9%)
TA: 5 (17.9%)

P=ns

US: 0
TA: 8 (28.6%)
P=0.01

Soeding 2005

Axillary + Interscalene (multi‐injection US versus landmark)

US:19 (95%)
LM: 18 (90%)

P not stated

US: 0
LM: 0

P not stated

US: 1 (5%)
LM: 2 (10%)
P=0.47

Intraoperative sedation using propofol, fentanyl or midazolam permitted. No statistical differences in the amount of sedation used between the US and LM groups

Williams 2003

Supraclavicular block (US+PNS versus PNS)

US+PNS: 34 (85%)
PNS: 31 (77.5%)

P=0.28

US+PNS: 6 (15%)
PNS: 6 (15%)

P=ns

US+PNS: 0
PNS: 3 (7.5%)

P=0.12

US: ultrasound; PNS: peripheral nerve stimulation; Stim: stimulating; LM: landmark; TA: transarterial; min: minutes; ns: not significant

Figuras y tablas -
Table 1. Block success
Table 2. Complications

Study

Block Assessed

Ultrasound Group

Control Group

Follow‐up period

Notes

Casati 2007a

Axillary (multi‐injection US versus multi‐injection PNS)

No neurological complications

No neurological complications

24 hours

Casati 2007b

Femoral (US versus PNS)

No neurological complications

No neurological complications

24 hours

Chan 2007

Axillary (US versus PNS)

Paraesthesia 13 (20%)
Bruising 2(3%)
Axillary pain 3(4.6%)

Paraesthesia 13 (21%)
Bruising 8 (13%)
Axillary pain 10 (16%)

Phone calls days 2 and 7 then weekly until resolution

Paraesthesia lasted <5 days all pts

Axillary (US +PNS versus PNS)

Paraesthesia 9 (15%)
Bruising 0
Axillary pain 3 (4.8%)

P not stated

Paraesthesia 13 (21%)
Bruising 8 (13%)
Axillary pain 10 (16%)

P not stated

Phone calls days 2 and 7 then weekly until resolution

Paraesthesia lasted <5 days all pts

Danelli 2009

Popliteal fossa sciatic (multiple injection PNS versus US)

No neuropraxia

Paraesthesia=0

Blood aspirated=0

No neuropraxia

Paraesthesia= 5 (P=0.057) 

Blood aspirated=5 (P=0.057)

24 hours

Dhir 2008

Infraclavicular brachial plexus (catheter)

a. US versus PNS (non‐stim catheter)

No complications

No complications

Postop days 1 and 7 then weekly until resolution paraesthesia

b. US versus PNS (stim catheter)

No complications

2 episodes postop paraesthesia

(resolved by 3/52)

Postop days 1 and 7 then weekly until resolution paraesthesia

Domingo‐Triado 2007

Midfemoral sciatic (single injection US+PNS versus single injection PNS)

None

Neuropathic pain: 1 (3%)

Phone call 24 hours

Neuropathic pain resolved day 10

Dufour 2008

Popliteal fossa sciatic (multiple injection PNS versus US+PNS)

No neurological complications

No neurological complications

Outpatients clinic 2 to 4 weeks later

Kapral 2008

Interscalene brachial plexus (PNS vs US)

No complications

No complications

Not clear

Liu 2005

Axillary (single injection US versus double injection PNS)

None

Paraesthesia: 3 (10%)
Vascular puncture: 3 (10%)
Haematoma: 1 (3%)

P=ns

Outpatients clinic ‐ interval not clear

Axillary (double injection US versus double injection PNS)

None

Paraesthesia: 3 (10%)
Vascular puncture: 3 (10%)
Haematoma: 1 (3%)

P=ns

Outpatients clinic ‐ interval not clear

Macaire 2008

Wrist block ‐ median and ulnar nerves (US versus PNS)

No permanent neurological complications

Transient paraesthesia 1 (3%)

No permanent neurological complications

Transient paraesthesia 2 (7%)

Not stated

Marhofer 1997

3‐in‐1 lumbar plexus (US versus PNS)

None

Vascular puncture: 3 (15%)

Visit at 24 hours

Marhofer 1998

3 in 1 lumbar plexus (US versus PNS)

None

Vascular puncture: 2 (10%) in each of PNS groups

Visit at 24 hours

Perlas 2008

Popliteal fossa sciatic (US versus PNS)

No immediate complications 

No neuropathy >7days (8 numbness/10 weakness days 1‐7)

No immediate complications

No neuropathy >7 days

24 hours then 7 days

(4 numbness/ 2 weakness days 1‐7)

Sauter 2008

Infraclavicular brachial plexus (US versus PNS)

No major complications

Paraesthesia: 8 (20%)

Blood aspirated: 2 (5%)

No haematoma formation

P not stated

No major complications

Paraesthesia: 1 (2.5%)

Blood aspirated: 13 (33%)

No haematoma formation

P not stated

<24 hours (before day case discharge)

Sites 2006

Axillary (multi‐injection US versus transarterial)

None

Intravascular injection: 1 (4%)
Haematoma: 2 (7%)

P not stated

Phone call 24 hours
Clinic 1‐2 weeks

Soeding 2005

Axillary and interscalene (multi injection US vs landmark)

None

Vascular puncture: 3 (15%)

P=0.281

Prior to discharge and phone call day 7

Williams 2003

Supraclavicular (US+PNS versus PNS)

Nerve injury: 2 (5%)
Phrenic nerve block: 1(2.5%)
Musculoskeletal pain: 1(2.5%)

Nerve injury: 1(2.5%)
Phrenic nerve block: 1(2.5%)
Musculoskeletal pain: 1(2.5%)

P not stated

Phone call 1 week

All nerve injuries resolved by day 7

US: ultrasound, ns: not significant

Figuras y tablas -
Table 2. Complications
Table 3. Block characteristics

Study ID

Block Assessed

Assessments made

Full motor block

Full sensory block

Block onset time

Block duration

Notes

Casati 2007a

Axillary (multi‐injection US versus multi‐injection PNS)

4 nerves tested every 5 min
Sensory: pinprick
Motor: loss of power

Insufficient details

Insufficient details

Motor Block
US: 24 +/‐ 8
PNS: 25 +/‐ 8
P= 0.33

Sensory Block
US: 14 +/‐ 6 min
PNS: 18+/‐ 6 min
P=0.01

Not assessed

Chan 2007

Axillary (US versus PNS and US +PNS versus US)

Median, radial + ulnar nerves tested every 5 min for 30 mins
Sensory: pinprick
Motor: Loss of power
Final assessment of adequacy at 30 min

"No significant differences"

US: 53 (82.8%)
P=0.01 (compared to PNS)

US+PNS: 50 (80.7%) P=0.03 (compared to PNS)

PNS: 39 (62.9%)

No numbers given

Not assessed

Danelli 2009

Popliteal fossa sciatic (multiple injection PNS versus US)

At 30 min post‐block

Tibial nerve and peroneal nerve 

Sensory: pinprick

Motor: degree of paresis

Full motor and sensory

US: 68%

PNS: 36%

P=0.07

Assessed with motor

Peroneal motor block faster with US (US 12.19±4.7 min; PNS 17.93±8.5 min; P=0.028)

No difference in tibial nerve or sensory block onset

Not assessed

Dhir 2008

Infraclavicular brachial plexus (catheter)

a. US versus PNS (non‐stim catheter)

Every 5 min up to 30min

(Axillary; median; ulnar; musculocutaneous; radial)

Sensory and motor

Full motor and sensory (30mins)

US: 20/23(87%)

PNS: 6/22 (27%)

P not clear

Assessed with motor

Not assessed

US: 246.2±50min

PNS: 261.6±53.3

 

P=ns

Success rate for top‐up

US: 20/22(91%)

PNS: 3/22 (14%)

P<0.0001

b. US versus PNS (stim catheter)

Full motor and sensory (30mins)

US: 20/23(87%)

PNS: 13/19 (68%)

P not clear

Assessed with motor

Not assessed

US: 246.2±50

PNS‐stim cath=247.5±49.6

P=ns

Success rate for top‐up

US: 20/22(91%)

PNS‐stim cath: 15/19 (79%)

P not given

Dolan 2008

Fascia iliaca (lumbar plexus) (US versus loss of resistance)

Sensory and motor at 30min

Femoral and obturator nerve

Femoral nerve

US: 35/39 (90%)

LOR: 24//38 (63%)

P=0.006

Obturator nerve

US: 18/40 (44%)

PNS: 9/40 (22%)

P=0.033

US: 33/40 (82%)

LOR: 19/40 (47%)

P=0.001

Not assessed

Not assessed

Motor block obturator nerve defined as 20% reduction in adduction power

Domingo‐Triado 2007

Midfemoral sciatic (single injection US+PNS versus single injection PNS)

Sensory: pinprick: tibial, deep and superficial peroneal
Motor: modified Bromage scale: tibial and peroneal nerves
(frequency not stated)

Only onset time reported

US+PNS= 29 (96.7%)
PNS= 22 (71%)
P=0.01

No numbers given No significant differences in onset times

No difference (patient assessed)

Postop: pts noted times of sensory and motor recovery

Dufour 2008

Popliteal fossa sciatic (multiple injection PNS versus US+PNS)

Sensory and motor every 5 mins until 30mins

Sensory: ice (score 0‐2); tibial; deep peroneal; sural

Motor: (score 0‐2); tibial nerve; common peroneal

Full motor

US+PNS: 65%

PNS: 16%

P<0.001

Full sensory

US+PNS: 85%

PNS: 32%

P<0.0002

Not assessed

Time to first analgesia

US+PNS 16.6±2.9 hr

PNS 17.1±3.7 hr

P=ns

Kapral 2008

Interscalene brachial plexus (PNS versus US)

Sensory and motor 5min up to 30min

Sensory: pinprick (0‐100% sensation); C5/C6/C7/C8/T1 dermatomes

Motor: radial/ulnar/median/axillary

At 30 min

Significant improved motor block in 2 nerves with US (median/ulnar) P<0.05

At 30 min:

Significant improvement sensory block C8/T1 with US. No difference other dermatomes

P<0.05

US: 10 (6‐13 min)

PNS: 22 (11‐28 min)

P<0.05

US: 899min (611‐1020)

PNS: 679 (417‐968)

P<0.05

Liu 2005

Axillary (single and double injection US versus double injection PNS)

One‐off assessment at 40min
Sensory: pinprick: 7 areas cutaneous nerves
Motor: degree of paresis: radial, median, ulnar + musculocutaneous

Motor + sensory
US (single inj): 21 (70%)
US (double inj): 22 (73%)
PNS (double inj): 21 (70%)

P=ns

Motor + sensory
US (single inj): 21 (70%)
US (double inj): 22 (73%)
PNS (double inj): 21 (70%)
P=ns

Only assessed at 40 min

Not assessed

Macaire 2008

Wrist block (median and ulnar) (US versus PNS)

Block assessed every 30sec up to 600 sec (10min)

Sensation (ice) median and ulnar nerve (score 0‐2)

Not assessed

US: 28/30 (93%)

PNS 27/29 (93%)

P=ns

Median nerve:

US:371(252‐465)

PNS:254(210‐300)

P=0.02

Ulnar nerve:

US:368 (246‐430)

PNS:241(210‐310)

P=0.01

Not assessed

Faster onset with PNS

Marhofer 1997

3‐in‐1 lumbar plexus (US versus PNS)

At 30 min + every 10 min to 1 hr 3 nerves
Sensory: pinprick
Motor: nnot undertaken

Not assessed

US: 19 (95%)
PNS: 17 (85%)

P=ns

Sensory block:
US:16±14 min
PNS:27±16 min
P<0.05

Not assessed

Marhofer 1998

3‐in‐1 lumbar plexus (US versus PNS)

Every 10 min for 1 hr 3 nerves
Sensory: pinprick
Motor: not undertaken

Not assessed

Not assessed

Sensory block
US: 13±16 min
PNS (low dose): 27±12 min
PNS (high dose): 26±13
P <0.01

Not assessed

Perlas 2008

Popliteal fossa sciatic (US versus PNS)

Sensory and motor every 5 mins up to 30 min then 10min up to 1 hr 

Sensory: pinprick (0‐2) (tibial/common peroneal)

Motor: muscle strength 0‐2 (tibial/common peroneal)

At 30 min

Common peroneal:

US: 37 (100%)

PNS: 28 (84.8%)

Tibial

US: 34 (91.9%)

PNS: 23 (69.7%)

P<0.01

At 30 min

Common peroneal:

US: 36 (97.3%)

PNS: 27 (81.8%)

Tibial

US: 33 (89.2%); PNS 23 (69.7%)

P<0.01

Faster onset with US

P<0.5 after 10min

Not assessed

Sauter 2008

Infraclavicular brachial plexus (US versus PNS)

Block assessed every 5 min up to 30min 

6 sensory nerves (to ice): axillary; musculocutaneous; radial; median; ulnar; medial antebrachial cutaneous; median brachial cutaneous; intercostobrachial 

No details of motor assessment

Not given

Not given

US: 13.9 min (SD 5.8)

 

PNS 13.7 (SD 6.6)

 

P=0.99

Not assessed

No comparison given on motor, sensory scores

Sites 2006

Axillary (multi injection US vs Transarterial)

Median, radial + ulnar every 5 mins for 30 mins
Sensory: to ice
Motor: degree of paresis

US: 23 (82%)
TA: 14 (58%)
P=0.07

US=21 (75%)
TA=14 (58%)
P=0.2

Not assessed

Not assessed

Soeding 2005

Axillary and interscalene (multi‐injection US versus landmark)

At 10 + 20 min and postop (frequency not stated)
Sensory: to ice: 8 areas cutaneous nerves
Motor: change in contraction: 8 muscle groups

Composite motor block scores improved with US

P values unclear

Composite sensory scores improved with US at 10 and 20 min

P values unclear

Faster onset sensory and motor block in US group

P values unclear

US: 11.2±0.59 hr
LM: 10.3±0.62 hr
P= 0.271

Although P values reported for block characteristics, it is unclear at what points these comparisons were made

Williams 2003

Supraclavicular (US+PNS versus PNS)

Musculocutaneous, median, radial, ulnar every 5 min for 30 min
Sensory: to ice
Motor: loss of force

Motor + Sensory
US: 55%
PNS: 65%
P= 0.25
(at 30min)

Assessed with with motor

Not assessed

US: median 662 min
PNS: 511
P=ns

US: ultrasound, PNS: peripheral nerve stimulator, LOR: loss of resistance, ns: not significant

Figuras y tablas -
Table 3. Block characteristics
Table 4. Volume of local anaesthetic

Study ID

Block assessed

Method

LA dose

Casati 2007b

Femoral (US versus PNS)

Volume of 0.5% ropivacaine varied by up‐and‐down staircase method depending upon response of previous patient

mean minimum effective anaesthetic volume required in 50% of patients (95% CI):
US: 15ml (7‐23)
PNS: 26ml (19‐33)
P =0.002

Marhofer 1998

3 in 1 lumbar plexus (US versus PNS)

Comparison with 20ml and US with 20ml and PNS and 30 ml with PNS (0.5% bupivacaine)

20ml US= 95% complete; 5% no block
20ml PNS= 80% complete; 10% no block
30ml PNS= 80% complete; 10% no block

US: ultrasound, PNS: peripheral nerve stimulator

Figuras y tablas -
Table 4. Volume of local anaesthetic
Table 5. Block performance

Study ID

Block assessed

Time to perform

No of attempts

Casati 2007a

Axillary (multi‐injection US versus multi‐injection PNS)

Not assessed

Skin punctures: Median (range)

US 2 (1‐2)
PNS 2 (2‐3)
P =0.94

Needle passes: median (range)
US 4 (3‐8)
PNS 8 (5‐13)
P=0.002

Chan 2007

Axillary (US versus PNS and US +PNS versus US)

Mean (± SD)
US: 9.3 min(± 4.0)
PNS: 11.2 min (± 4.2) P<0.01

US+PNS: 12.4 min (± 4.8)

P not stated

Not assessed

Danelli 2009

Popliteal fossa sciatic (multiple injection PNS versus US)

US: 2 min (2‐8)

PNS: 5 (2‐15)

P=0.002

Skin puncture:

US: 2 (1‐4); PNS: 2 (2‐4)

P=0.003

 

Needle redirections: US: 4 (1‐7); PNS 6 (1‐20); P<0.001

Dhir 2008

Infraclavicular brachial plexus (catheter)

a. US versus PNS (non‐stim catheter)

(Total time)

US: 13.3 min

PNS: 9.7 min

P not clear

Not assessed

b. US versus PNS (stim catheter)

(Total time)

US: 13.3 min

PNS‐stim catheter: 18.4 min

P not clear

Not assessed

Domingo‐Triado 2007

Midfemoral sciatic (single injection US+PNS versus single injection PNS)

US: 5 min (range: 5‐15)
PNS: 5 min (range: 5‐15)

Median (range)
US: 1 (1‐2)
PNS: 2 (1‐4)
P= 0.001

Dufour 2008

Popliteal fossa sciatic (multiple injection PNS versus US+PNS)

US: 318 sec

PNS: 312sec

P=ns

Skin punctures

US: 1±0.2

PNS: 1±0

P=ns

 

Needle passes

US: 1 (1‐12)
PNS: 2 (1‐18)

P=ns

Liu 2005

Axillary (single injection US versus double injection PNS)

US (double inj): 6.7 min (±1.3)
US (single inj): 6.5 min (±1.3)
PNS: 8.2 min (±1.5)
P<0.005

Mean (±SD)

Not assessed

Macaire 2008

Wrist block (median and ulnar) (US versus PNS)

US: 157 sec (131‐215)

PNS: 210 sec (140‐280)

P=0.13

Not assessed

Sauter 2008

Infraclavicular brachial plexus (US versus PNS)

US: 4.1 min

PNS: 4.3 min

P=ns

Needle passes

US: 1 (range 1‐3)

PNS 3 (range 2‐10)

P=<0.001

Sites 2006

Axillary (multi injection US versus transarterial)

Mean (± SD)
US: 7.9 min (± 3.9)
TA: 11.1 min (± 5.7)
P<0.05

4 failed attempts with TA ‐ blocked with US and included in TA group
1 patient in TA group required more experienced practitioner

Williams 2003

Supraclavicular (US+PNS versus PNS)

Mean (±SD)
US+PNS: 5.0 min (±2.4)
PNS: 9.8 min (±7.5)
P=0.0001

1 patient PNS group required more experienced practitioner

2 patients required alternate US views to locate plexus

US: ultrasound, PNS: peripheral nerve stimulator, TA: transarterial

Figuras y tablas -
Table 5. Block performance
Table 6. Patient discomfort

Study ID

Block assessed

Patient discomfort

Casati 2007a

Axillary (multi‐injection US versus multi‐injection PNS)

VAS 0‐10: median (range)
US: 1 (0‐8)
PNS: 3 (0‐8)
P=0.11

Danelli 2009

Popliteal fossa sciatic (multiple injection PNS versus US)

NRS

US: 2 (0‐6)

PNS: 4 (0‐10)

P=0.002

Domingo‐Triado 2007

Midfemoral sciatic (single injection US+PNS versus single injection PNS)

VAS <4
US+PNS: 23(76.7%)
PNS: 27 (87.7%)
P=ns

Dufour 2008

Popliteal fossa sciatic (multiple injection PNS versus US+PNS)

VAS >3

US: 4

PNS: 1

P=ns

Macaire 2008

Wrist block (median and ulnar) (US versus PNS)

VAS

US: 40 (20‐52)

PNS: 40 (30‐44)

P=0.72

Sauter 2008

Infraclavicular brachial plexus (US versus PNS)

NRS 0‐10

US: 1 (0‐5)

PNS: 1 (0‐9)

P=0.92

US: ultrasound; PNS: peripheral nerve stimulator; VAS: visual analogue scale; NRS: numerical rating score

Figuras y tablas -
Table 6. Patient discomfort