Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Diagnóstico viral rápido para la enfermedad respiratoria febril aguda en niños que son atendidos en la sala de urgencias

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006452.pub2Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 07 octubre 2009see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Infecciones respiratorias agudas

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2010 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Quynh Doan

    Correspondencia a: Department of Pediatric Emeregency, UBC Pediatrics, Vancouver, Canada

    [email protected]

    [email protected]

  • Paul Enarson

    Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Room 2D19, University of British Columbia, British Columbia's Children's Hospital, Vancouver, Canada

  • Niranjan Kissoon

    British Columbia Children's Hospital, Associate Head and Professor, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

  • Terry P Klassen

    Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada

  • David W Johnson

    Departments of Pediatrics, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Canada

Contributions of authors

Quynh Doan (QD) designed and wrote the protocol.
Terry Klassen (TK) and QD prepared the quality assessment forms and data extraction forms.
Paul Enarson and QD selected and reviewed relevant studies, assessed the quality of studies, extracted and analyzed the data and wrote the review draft.
Niranjan Kissoon (NK), David Johnson (DJ) and TK provided advice, reviewed, edited and approved the draft.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • University of British Columbia, Canada.

    Electronic database search engines and reference manager programs were accessible from the University Library.

  • Albert Research Center for Child Health Evidence, Canada.

    Librarian expertise and support was provided by this organization.

External sources

  • No sources of support supplied

Declarations of interest

None known.

Acknowledgements

The review authors wish to thank the following people for commenting on the draft protocol: Catrina Forde, Olli Meurman, Hsu‐Tah Kuo, Sree Nair and Geoff Spurling. The review authors also thank Ms Ruth A Milner, their biostatistician, for her invaluable support and guidance. Finally, the authors wish to thank the following people for commenting on the draft review: Amy Zelmer, Vidya Sharma, Mary Moffatt, Rajni Bhatia, Rick Shoemaker, and Geoff Spurling.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2014 Sep 15

Rapid viral diagnosis for acute febrile respiratory illness in children in the Emergency Department

Review

Quynh Doan, Paul Enarson, Niranjan Kissoon, Terry P Klassen, David W Johnson

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006452.pub4

2012 May 16

Rapid viral diagnosis for acute febrile respiratory illness in children in the Emergency Department

Review

Quynh Doan, Paul Enarson, Niranjan Kissoon, Terry P Klassen, David W Johnson

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006452.pub3

2009 Oct 07

Rapid viral diagnosis for acute febrile respiratory illness in children in the Emergency Department

Review

Quynh Doan, Paul Enarson, Niranjan Kissoon, Terry P Klassen, David W Johnson

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006452.pub2

2009 Jul 08

Rapid viral diagnosis for acute febrile respiratory illness in children in the Emergency Department

Protocol

Quynh Doan, David W Johnson, Niranjan Kissoon, Terry P Klassen

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006452

Differences between protocol and review

1) At the protocol stage, we had intended to assess inter‐rater agreement for quality of trial assessment, but as there was no disagreement between the two review authors (QD, PE) regarding the quality assessment of the included trials, an overtly complicated adapted Kappa for ordinal categorical inter‐rater assessment was felt to be unwarranted.

2) At the protocol stage, we were going to see if subgroup analyses by child age categories would yield important differences in outcomes. As so few studies were included in this review, pooled results still lacked power to definitively determine the effect of rapid viral testing. We concluded that further sub‐grouping of participants would unlikely yield significant information and did not run such analyses.

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.