Rapid viral diagnosis for acute febrile respiratory illness in children in the Emergency Department

Quynh Doan; Paul Enarson; Niranjan Kissoon; Terry P Klassen; David W Johnson

doi:10.1002/14651858.CD006452.pub2

Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Contenido relacionado

Ir a:

Revisiones y protocolos relacionados
Guías
Temas

Revisiones y protocolos relacionados

Topics

Temas

Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Antibiotics use, Outcome 1 Antibiotics prescribed in ED.

Ir a la figura de la revisiónAbrir en una pestaña nueva

Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Antibiotics use, Outcome 2 Sensitivity analysis per risk of bias.

Ir a la figura de la revisiónAbrir en una pestaña nueva

Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 ED length of visit, Outcome 1 Mean ED length of visit in minutes.

Ir a la figura de la revisiónAbrir en una pestaña nueva

Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2 ED length of visit, Outcome 2 Sensitivity analysis per risk of bias.

Ir a la figura de la revisiónAbrir en una pestaña nueva

Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3 Laboratory investigations, Outcome 1 Blood investigations (cell count and/or cultures).

Ir a la figura de la revisiónAbrir en una pestaña nueva

Analysis 3.2

Comparison 3 Laboratory investigations, Outcome 2 Urine testing.

Ir a la figura de la revisiónAbrir en una pestaña nueva

Analysis 3.3

Comparison 3 Laboratory investigations, Outcome 3 Blood investigation: sensitivity analysis per risk of bias.

Ir a la figura de la revisiónAbrir en una pestaña nueva

Analysis 3.4

Comparison 3 Laboratory investigations, Outcome 4 Urine testing: sensitivity analysis per risk of bias.

Ir a la figura de la revisiónAbrir en una pestaña nueva

Analysis 4.1

Comparison 4 Chest radiography, Outcome 1 Chest radiography.

Ir a la figura de la revisiónAbrir en una pestaña nueva

Analysis 4.2

Comparison 4 Chest radiography, Outcome 2 Sensitivity analysis per risk of bias.

Ir a la figura de la revisiónAbrir en una pestaña nueva

Analysis 5.1

Comparison 5 Visits to physician or ED post ED discharge, Outcome 1 Post ED discharge visit to MD.

Ir a la figura de la revisiónAbrir en una pestaña nueva

Comparison 1. Antibiotics use

Outcome or subgroup title	No. of studies	No. of participants	Statistical method	Effect size
1 Antibiotics prescribed in ED Show forest plot	4	1590	Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	0.89 [0.71, 1.12]

2 Sensitivity analysis per risk of bias Show forest plot	3	890	Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	0.86 [0.61, 1.22]

Comparison 1. Antibiotics use

Ir a la tabla de la revisión

Comparison 2. ED length of visit

Outcome or subgroup title	No. of studies	No. of participants	Statistical method	Effect size
1 Mean ED length of visit in minutes Show forest plot	3	1290	Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)	‐10.61 [‐22.47, 1.25]

2 Sensitivity analysis per risk of bias Show forest plot	2	590	Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)	‐19.47 [‐51.38, 12.44]

Comparison 2. ED length of visit

Ir a la tabla de la revisión

Comparison 3. Laboratory investigations

Outcome or subgroup title	No. of studies	No. of participants	Statistical method	Effect size
1 Blood investigations (cell count and/or cultures) Show forest plot	4	1590	Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	0.79 [0.62, 1.00]

2 Urine testing Show forest plot	4	1588	Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	0.97 [0.79, 1.19]

3 Blood investigation: sensitivity analysis per risk of bias Show forest plot	3	888	Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	0.61 [0.42, 0.89]

4 Urine testing: sensitivity analysis per risk of bias Show forest plot	3	890	Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	0.93 [0.70, 1.25]

Comparison 3. Laboratory investigations

Ir a la tabla de la revisión

Comparison 4. Chest radiography

Outcome or subgroup title	No. of studies	No. of participants	Statistical method	Effect size
1 Chest radiography Show forest plot	4	1590	Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	0.77 [0.65, 0.91]

2 Sensitivity analysis per risk of bias Show forest plot	3	890	Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	0.59 [0.43, 0.81]

Comparison 4. Chest radiography

Ir a la tabla de la revisión

Comparison 5. Visits to physician or ED post ED discharge

Outcome or subgroup title	No. of studies	No. of participants	Statistical method	Effect size
1 Post ED discharge visit to MD Show forest plot	2	899	Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	1.00 [0.77, 1.29]

Comparison 5. Visits to physician or ED post ED discharge

Ir a la tabla de la revisión

The Cochrane Library

Scolaris Language Selector Scolaris Language Selector

Idioma de la Revisión Cochrane

Idioma de la web

Scolaris Content Language Banner Portlet Scolaris Content Language Banner Portlet