Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for preventing unintended pregnancies among adolescents

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005215.pub2Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 07 octubre 2009see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Regulación de la fertilidad

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2010 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Chioma Oringanje

    Correspondencia a: Institute of Tropical Disease Research and Prevention, University of Calabar Teaching Hospital, Calabar, Nigeria

    [email protected]

  • Martin M Meremikwu

    Department of Paediatrics, University of Calabar Teaching Hospital, Calabar, Nigeria

  • Hokehe Eko

    St. Georges University School of Medicine, New York, USA

  • Ekpereonne Esu

    Effective Health Care Research Programme ‐ Nigeria, University of Calabar Teaching Hospital, Calabar, Nigeria

  • Anne Meremikwu

    Department of Curriculum and Teaching, University of Calabar, Calabar, Nigeria

  • John E Ehiri

    Division of Health Promotion Sciences, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, USA

Contributions of authors

JE conceived the review; JE, MM, AM contributed to the design and drafting of the protocol.

JE and MM coordinated the review, CO, EE, HE undertook searches of electronic databases (CENTRAL, PubMed, EMBASE, LILACS), carried out the email search for unpublished literature, and organized the retrieval of papers.

CO, EE and HE screened for included studies while CO and EE extracted and entered data on trial results into RevMan5.

MM and CO interpreted the data and prepared the first draft of the complete review.

All authors contributed to the drafting and editing of the review.

JM and MM secured funding for the review.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • University of Calabar, Calabar, Nigeria.

External sources

  • Australian Cochrane Centre, Australia.

    Provided the fund for this review

  • Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, USA.

  • Nigeria branch of the South Africa Cochrane Centre, Nigeria.

Declarations of interest

None

Acknowledgements

The support of the Australasian Cochrane Centre in providing the grant for this review is gratefully acknowledged. Professor Alba DiCenso is gratefully acknowledged for providing technical guidance.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2016 Feb 03

Interventions for preventing unintended pregnancies among adolescents

Review

Chioma Oringanje, Martin M Meremikwu, Hokehe Eko, Ekpereonne Esu, Anne Meremikwu, John E Ehiri

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005215.pub3

2009 Oct 07

Interventions for preventing unintended pregnancies among adolescents

Review

Chioma Oringanje, Martin M Meremikwu, Hokehe Eko, Ekpereonne Esu, Anne Meremikwu, John E Ehiri

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005215.pub2

2009 Jul 08

Interventions for preventing unintended pregnancies among adolescents

Protocol

John E Ehiri, Anne Meremikwu, Martin M Meremikwu

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005215

Differences between protocol and review

We included four trials that had a small percentage of participants aged 19 to 24 years (outside the age limit stipulated in the protocol). However, the ages of most the study population (more than 75%) in each of these four trials were within the age limit stipulated in the review protocol (10 to 19 years).

We excluded all quasi experimental and cross over trials as this was cumbersome and would have prolonged the completion of this review.

Methodological quality of included studies were assessed using "Risk of Bias tool" outlined in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1, 2008 and no longer by method outlined in the 2004 Cochrane Reviewers' Handbook (Clark 2004) as previously stated.

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.