Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Techniques de préparation du sperme pour l’insémination intra‐utérine

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004507.pub3Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 17 octubre 2007see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Ginecología y fertilidad

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2011 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Carolien M. Boomsma

    Correspondencia a: Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands

    [email protected]

  • Maas Jan Heineman

    Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands

  • Ben J Cohlen

    Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Isala Clinics, Location Sophia, Zwolle, Netherlands

  • Cindy Farquhar

    Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

Contributions of authors

CM Boomsma has prepared the manuscript. CM Boomsma and MJ Heineman have performed the selection of studies for inclusion. C Farquhar and BJ Cohlen were involved in concept and study design.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • University of Auckland, New Zealand.

External sources

  • Marco Polo Fonds, Netherlands.

  • Groninger Universiteits Fonds, Netherlands.

Declarations of interest

disponible en

None known

Acknowledgements

disponible en

The authors would like to thank several people for helping in the construction of this review, namely Michelle Proctor, Review Group Coordinator of the Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group (MDSG); Ruth Buist for retrieval of trials and Sue Hall for helping to collect trials we needed and their positive support; Anne Lethaby for her statistical advice. We would also like to thank Dr M Merrilees and Dr MHJM. Curfs for their advice on laboratory techniques and A Vail and J Deeks for their advice on the statistical analysis. A special thanks to Dr WC Dodson, Dr R Menkveld and Dr P Prakash for putting such an effort into getting the information we asked for and for always replying to the numerous e‐mails we sent. Also a thank you is extended to Dr E Makrakis, Dr M Bajamonte, Dr J Check, Dr WCL Ford, Dr M Hammadeh, Dr A Menge, Dr M Morshedi, Dr A Oliva, Dr U Punjabi, Dr P Serafini, Dr C Srisombut, Dr B Storey and Dr L Werlin, who provided additional information on their trials.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2019 Oct 15

Semen preparation techniques for intrauterine insemination

Review

Carolien M. Boomsma, Ben J Cohlen, Cindy Farquhar

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004507.pub4

2007 Oct 17

Semen preparation techniques for intrauterine insemination

Review

Carolien M. Boomsma, Maas Jan Heineman, Ben J Cohlen, Cindy Farquhar

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004507.pub3

2004 Jul 19

Semen preparation techniques for intrauterine insemination

Review

Carolien M Boomsma, Maas Jan Heineman, Ben J Cohlen, Cindy M Farquhar

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004507.pub2

2003 Apr 22

Semen preparation techniques for subfertility

Protocol

Carolien C M Boomsma, Ben J Cohlen, Maas Jan MJ Heineman

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004507

Differences between protocol and review

After identifying the studies eligible for inclusion in the meta‐analysis, some changes were made to the protocol for this review. Initially we intended to include studies investigating clinical outcomes after IUI, IVF or GIFT. We decided to limit the review to IUI due to a large difference in the amount and quality of sperm needed for IUI compared to IVF and GIFT.

Timeline

It is the intention of the review authors that a new search for RCTs will be performed every two years and the review updated accordingly.

Notes

None

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.