Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Continuous passive motion following total knee arthroplasty in people with arthritis

Esta versión no es la más reciente

ver la versión actual 06 febrero 2014

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004260.pub2Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 17 marzo 2010see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:

  1. Grupo Cochrane de Salud musculoesquelética

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2010 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Lisa A Harvey

    Correspondencia a: Rehabilitation Studies Unit, Northern Clinical School, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Ryde, Australia

    [email protected]

  • Lucie Brosseau

    School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada

  • Robert D Herbert

    Centre for Evidence‐Based Physiotherapy, Musculoskeletal Division, The George Institute for International Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia

Contributions of authors

LA Harvey was responsible for rewriting the manuscript, conducting the updated search, screening potentially eligible trials, extracting all data reported in the original review and additional data required for the update, analysing data, interpreting results, updating reference list and creating Summary of Findings Table.
L Brosseau was responsible for the following tasks associated with the 2003 version of this review: extracting data, updating the reference list, updating the analyses and updating the interpretation of results.
RD Herbert contributed to rewriting the manuscript, screening potentially eligible trials, extracting additional data required for the update, analysing data, interpreting results and creating the Summary of Findings Table.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • The University of Ottawa, Canada.

  • The Rehabilitation Studies Unit, Northern Clinical School, School of Medicine, University of Sydney, Not specified.

External sources

  • NHMRC, Australia.

    fellowship for RDH

Declarations of interest

None known.

Acknowledgements

First version of the review (2003):
The authors thank J McGowan for her help and expertise in designing the literature search, and C Lamothe for her help with data extraction and data entry. R Herbert, T Lessen, and R DeBie provided valuable feedback in their roles as peer reviewers.

The authors acknowledge and thank the authors of the 2003 version of the review for the following:
SE Milne was responsible for writing the manuscript, extracting and analysing data and screening potentially‐eligible trials.
V Welch contributed to updating the analyses and interpretation of the results.
GA Wells and P Tugwell contributed to designing the methodology and commenting on early drafts.
MJ Noel contributed to extracting the data, analysing and selecting trials.
H Drouin contributed to extracting data, analysing and selecting trials.
J Davis contributed to extracting data, analysing and selecting trials.

Update of review (2009):
The authors are grateful to C Ng and N Pontifex for their assistance with data entry and proof reading.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2014 Feb 06

Continuous passive motion following total knee arthroplasty in people with arthritis

Review

Lisa A Harvey, Lucie Brosseau, Robert D Herbert

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004260.pub3

2010 Mar 17

Continuous passive motion following total knee arthroplasty in people with arthritis

Review

Lisa A Harvey, Lucie Brosseau, Robert D Herbert

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004260.pub2

2003 Apr 22

Continuous passive motion following total knee arthroplasty

Review

Sarah Milne, Lucie Brosseau, Vivian Welch, Marie‐Josee Noel, J Davis, Hugo Drouin, George A Wells, Peter Tugwell

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004260

Differences between protocol and review

The protocol was modified when the review was updated in 2009. The modifications were:

  1. participants restricted to those with pre‐surgery diagnosis of arthritis;

  2. comparisons were changed from CPM and physiotherapy versus physiotherapy alone to CPM and standard postoperative care versus CPM and standard postoperative care with active or passive knee exercises;

  3. updated methods based on current Cochrane Collaboration recommendations for risk of bias assessment, Summary of Findings Table, and the updated Cochrane search filter for identifying RCTs;

  4. endpoints were classified as short‐, medium‐ and long‐term;

  5. only one observation was extracted for each outcome within a particular endpoint (short, medium or long term);

  6. in trials with more than two groups, only data from the two groups with the most contrasting interventions were extracted and used for analyses;

  7. the comparisons were divided into primary and secondary comparisons; and

  8. pain outcomes were restricted to direct measures of pain intensity (e.g. visual analogue scale); data on pain medication were not extracted.

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.