Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Planned elective repeat caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for women with a previous caesarean birth

Esta versión no es la más reciente

ver la versión actual 10 diciembre 2013

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004224.pub2Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 18 octubre 2004see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:

  1. Grupo Cochrane de Embarazo y parto

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2012 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Jodie M Dodd

    Correspondencia a: School of Paediatrics and Reproductive Health, Discipline of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia

    [email protected]

  • Caroline A Crowther

    ARCH: Australian Research Centre for Health of Women and Babies, Discipline of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia

  • Erasmo Huertas

    Adolescence Unit, Materno Perinatal Institute of Lima‐Peru, Lima 01, Peru

  • Jeanne‐Marie Guise

    Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, USA

  • Dell Horey

    Research Education & Development Unit, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia

Contributions of authors

Jodie Dodd and Caroline Crowther were involved in the drafting of the original review. All authors contributed equally to the subsequent revisions of the review.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • The University of Adelaide, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Australia.

External sources

  • No sources of support supplied

Declarations of interest

Jodie Dodd and Caroline Crowther are in the planning phase of a study related to birth after caesarean.

Acknowledgements

As part of the pre‐publication editorial process, this review has been commented on by two peers (an editor and referee who are external to the editorial team), one or more members of the Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's international panel of consumers and the Group's Statistical Adviser.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2013 Dec 10

Planned elective repeat caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for women with a previous caesarean birth

Review

Jodie M Dodd, Caroline A Crowther, Erasmo Huertas, Jeanne‐Marie Guise, Dell Horey

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004224.pub3

2004 Oct 18

Planned elective repeat caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for women with a previous caesarean birth

Review

Jodie M Dodd, Caroline A Crowther, Erasmo Huertas, Jeanne‐Marie Guise, Dell Horey

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004224.pub2

2003 Apr 22

Planned elective repeat caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for women with a previous caesarean birth

Protocol

Jodie M Dodd, Caroline A Crowther, Erasmo Huertas

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004224

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.