Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004014.pub2Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 18 octubre 2004see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Incontinencia

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2007 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Christopher Maher

    Correspondencia a: Brisbane, Australia

    [email protected]

  • Kaven Baessler

    Urogynaecology, Auchenflower, Australia

  • Cathryn MA Glazener

    Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK

  • Elisabeth J Adams

    Dept of Urodynamics, Liverpool Women's Hospital, Liverpool, UK

  • Suzanne Hagen

    Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Faculty of Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK

Contributions of authors

All reviewers contributed to writing the protocol. Two reviewers (C Maher, K Baessler) assessed the relevance and eligibility of studies for inclusion in the review. They then assessed the quality of included studies. Three reviewers (C Maher, K Baessler, C Glazener) independently extracted data from trial reports. Three reviewers (C Maher, K Baessler, C Glazener) interpreted the results and contributed to the writing of the draft version of the review. Two reviewers (E Adams, S Hagen) commented on the draft version of the review.

Declarations of interest

The lead reviewer, Christopher Maher, is an author of one of the included trials.

Acknowledgements

The reviewers are grateful to MA Kahn and K Nieminen for contributing unpublished trial data to this review.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2016 Nov 30

Surgery for women with anterior compartment prolapse

Review

Christopher Maher, Benjamin Feiner, Kaven Baessler, Corina Christmann‐Schmid, Nir Haya, Julie Brown

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004014.pub6

2013 Apr 30

Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women

Review

Christopher Maher, Benjamin Feiner, Kaven Baessler, Corina Schmid

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004014.pub5

2010 Apr 14

Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women

Review

Christopher Maher, Benjamin Feiner, Kaven Baessler, Cathryn MA Glazener

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004014.pub4

2007 Jul 18

Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women

Review

Christopher Maher, Kaven Baessler, Cathryn MA Glazener, Elisabeth J Adams, Suzanne Hagen

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004014.pub3

2004 Oct 18

Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women

Review

Christopher Maher, Kaven Baessler, Cathryn MA Glazener, Elisabeth J Adams, Suzanne Hagen

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004014.pub2

2003 Jan 20

Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women

Protocol

Christopher Maher, M Carey, Elisabeth J Adams, Suzanne Hagen

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004014

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.