Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Blood pressure lowering efficacy of loop diuretics for primary hypertension

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003825.pub2Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 07 octubre 2009see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Hipertensión

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2010 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Vijaya M Musini

    Correspondencia a: Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

    [email protected]

  • James M Wright

    Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

  • Ken Bassett

    Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

  • Ciprian D Jauca

    Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

Contributions of authors

James Wright and Vijaya Musini formulated the idea for the review and developed the basis for the protocol.

Vijaya Musini designed the search strategy, undertook the search, screened search results, collected data for the review, screened retrieved papers against eligibility criteria, appraised the risk of bias of papers, extracted data from papers, entered data into RevMan, analysed and interpreted data, and wrote the review.

Ciprian Jauca was the second reviewer in identifying trials meeting inclusion criteria, translating two non‐English studies (one in French and one in German), assessing risk of bias of all included studies and performing data abstraction.

James Wright and Ken Bassett confirmed accuracy of data and were the third and fourth reviewers to settle any discrepancies in inclusion criteria or data abstraction.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology & Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, Canada.

External sources

  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Canada.

    grant to the Hypertension Review Group.

Declarations of interest

None.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the help provided by the Cochrane Hypertension Group. We would specially like to thank Stephen Adams who sorted search findings in Reference Manager and retrieved articles to complete this review. We would also like to thank Dr. Balraj Heran for extracting data from the graph of the Homuth 1993 trial.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2015 May 22

Blood pressure‐lowering efficacy of loop diuretics for primary hypertension

Review

Vijaya M Musini, Pouria Rezapour, James M Wright, Ken Bassett, Ciprian D Jauca

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003825.pub4

2012 Aug 15

Blood pressure lowering efficacy of loop diuretics for primary hypertension

Review

Vijaya M Musini, Pouria Rezapour, James M Wright, Ken Bassett, Ciprian D Jauca

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003825.pub3

2009 Oct 07

Blood pressure lowering efficacy of loop diuretics for primary hypertension

Review

Vijaya M Musini, James M Wright, Ken Bassett, Ciprian D Jauca

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003825.pub2

2009 Jul 08

Blood pressure lowering efficacy of loop diuretics for primary hypertension

Protocol

Vijaya M Musini, James M Wright, Ken Bassett, Ciprian D Jauca

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003825

Differences between protocol and review

The search was updated until March 2009. To be able to maximize data inclusion, trials that reported data after 12 weeks were also included in the meta‐analysis.

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.