Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Fluticasona en diferentes dosis para el asma crónica en adultos y niños

Contraer todo Desplegar todo

Referencias

References to studies included in this review

Agertoft 1997 {published data only}

Agertoft L, Pedersen S. Bone, growth and collagen markers in children treated with fluticasone propionate and budesonide.. European Respiratory Journal 1996;9(23 Suppl):295s.
Agertoft L, Pedersen S. Short‐term knemometry and urine cortisol excretion in children treated with fluticasone propionate and budesonide: a dose response study. European Respiratory Journal 1997;10(7):1507‐12.
FLIS‐02. http://ctr.gsk.co.uk2005.

Allen 1998 {published data only}

Allen DB, Bronsky EA, LaForce CF, Nathan RA, Tinkelman DG, Vandewalker ML, Konig P. Growth in asthmatic children treated with fluticasone propionate. Fluticasone Propionate Asthma Study Group. Journal of Pediatrics 1998;132(3 Pt 1):472‐7.
FLD‐220. http://ctr.gsk.co.uk2005.
Konig P, Ford L, Galant S, Lawrence M, Lemanske R, Mendelson L, et al. A 1‐year comparison of the effects of inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP) and placebo on growth in pre‐pubescent children with asthma. European Respiratory Journal 1996;9:S294.
Mahajan P, Pearlman D, Okamoto L. The effect of fluticasone propionate on functional status and sleep in children with asthma and on the quality of life of their parents. Journal of Allergy & Clinical Immunology 1998;102(1):19‐23.

Allen 2000 {published data only}

Allen T, Wire P, Wolford J, Harding S. Fluticasone propionate (FP) via the diskus device maintained prednisone reduction beyond one year. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2000;161(3 Suppl):A185.

Ayres 1995 {published data only}

Ayres JG, Bateman ED, Lundback B, Harris TAJ. High dose fluticasone propionate, 1 mg daily, versus fluticasone propionate, 2 mg daily, or budesonide, 1.6 mg daily, in patients with chronic severe asthma. European Respiratory Journal 1995;8:579‐86.

Boner 1999 {published data only}

Boner A, de Benedictis F, La Rosa M, Decimo F, Piacentini G, von Berg A, et al. Clincial Trial to compare the efficacy of two doses of fluticasone propionate (FP) 200 mcg/day and 400 mcg/day, administered for 6 weeks to asthmatic children, as assessed by bronchial responsiveness to methacholine. American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine 1999;159(3 pt 2):A139.
FLTB3051. Report on a multicentre, randomised, double‐blind, parallel‐group clinical trial to compare the efficacy and safety of the dry powder formulation of fluticasone propionate (FP) 200µg/day with fluticasone propionate 400µg/day administered for 6 weeks from a multidose powder device (Diskus™) to paediatric patients with chronic asthma. http://ctr.gsk.co.uk2005.

Bukovskis 2002 {unpublished data only}

Bukovskis M, Jurka N, Taivans I. Influence of large and small dose of fluticasone propionate on clinical symptoms of bronchial asthma, lung function, bronchial hyperreactivity and eosinophilia in induced sputum. European Respiratory Journal 2002;20(Suppl 38):P755.

Casale 2001 {published data only}

Casale T B, Nelson HS, Stricker WE, Raff H, Newman KB. Suppression of hypothalamic‐pituitary‐adrenal axis activity with inhaled flunisolide and fluticasone propionate in adult asthma patients. Annals of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology 2001;87(5):379‐85.
Casale TB, Nelson HS, Stricker W, Fourre JA, Newman KB. Dose response of the effect of inhale fluticasone and flunisolide on endogenous cortisol secretion. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2000;161(3 Suppl):A776.

Chervinsky 1994 {published data only}

Chervinsky P, van As A, Bronsky EA, Dockhorn R, Noonan M, LaForce C, Pleskow W. Fluticasone propionate aerosol for the treatment of adults with mild to moderate asthma. The Fluticasone Propionate Asthma Study Group. Journal of Allergy & Clinical Immunology 1994;94(4):676‐83.
FLI201. A randomized, double‐blind comparative trial of three dosage regimens of inhaled fluticasone propionate versus placebo in adult patients with asthma. http://ctr.gsk.co.uk 2005.

Chetta 2003 {published data only}

Chetta A, Zanini A, Foresi A, Del Donno M, Castagnaro A, D'Ippolito R, et al. Vascular component of airway remodelling in asthma is reduced by high dose of fluticasone. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2003;167(5):751‐7.
Foresi A, Pelucchi A, Dorini S, Mastropasqua B, Chetta A, D'Ippolito R, et al. Low‐dose (100µg, b.i.d.) inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP) is as affective as high‐dose (500µg, b.i.d.) in mild symptomatic asthma. European Respiratory Journal 2001;18(Supp 33):96s.
Foresi A, Pelucchi A, Dorini S, Mastropasqua B, Chetta A, Ippolito RD, et al. Effect of low and high dose inhaled fluticasone propionate fp in symptomatic asthma. Annual Thoracic Society 97th International Conference; San Francisco CA ,May 18‐23, www.abstracts2view.com 2001.

Dahl 1993 {published data only}

Dahl R, Lundback B, Malo JL, Mazza JA, Nieminen MM, Saarelainen P, Barnacle H. A dose‐ranging study of fluticasone propionate in adult patients with moderate asthma. International Study Group. Chest 1993;104:1352‐8.
FLIT05. www.clinicalstudyresults.org.

Derom 1999 {published data only}

Derom E, Van Schoor J, Verhaeghe W, Vincken W, Pauwels R. Systemic effects of inhaled fluticasone propionate and budesonide in adult patients with asthma. American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine 1999;160(1):157‐61.

Derom 2005 {published data only}

Derom E, Van De Velde V, Marissens S, Engelstatter R, Vincken W, Pauwels R. Effects of inhaled ciclesonide and fluticasone propionate on cortisol secretion and airway responsiveness to adenosine 5'monophosphate in asthmatic patients. Pulmonary Pharmacology & Therapeutics 2005;18(5):328‐36.
Derom E, Van De Velde V, Marissens S, Vincken W, Pauwels RA. Efficacy and systemic effects of ciclesonide and fluticasone in asthma patients. European Respiratory Journal 2001;18(Suppl 33):147s.
Pauwels RA, Derom E, Van De Velde V, Marissens S, Vincken W. Effects of inhaled ciclesonide and fluticasone propionate on cortisol secretion and PC²° for adenosine in asthma patients. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2002;165(Suppl 8):A768..

Falcoz 2000 {published data only}

Falcoz C, Horton J, Mackie A, Harding S, Daley‐Yates PT. Pharmacokinetics of fluticasone propionate inhaled via the diskhaler and diskus powder devices in patients with mild‐to‐moderate asthma. Cinical Pharmacokinetics 2000;39(Suppl 1):31‐7.

FAP30001 {unpublished data only}

FAP30001. A randomized, double‐blind, parallel‐group trial of inhaled fluticasone propionate/GR106642X 220mcg BID and 440mcg BID in adolescent and adult subjects with asthma. www.clinicalstudyresults.org 2005 [Accessed 14/11/2007].

FLIC15 {unpublished data only}

FLIC15. www.clinicalstudyresults.org2005.

FLIP01 {published data only}

FLIP01. http://ctr.gsk.co.uk 2005.

FLIP01a {published data only}

FLIP01. http://ctr.gsk.co.uk 2005.

FLIP39 {unpublished data only}

FLIP39. http://ctr.gsk.co.uk2005.

FLTA3014 {published data only}

FLTA3014. www.clinicalstudyresults.org2005.

FLTA3020 {published data only}

FLTA3020. http:ctr.gsk.co.uk 2005.

FLTA3020a {published data only}

FLTA3020. http:ctr.gsk.co.uk2005.

FLTA3022 {unpublished data only}

FLTA3022. A Randomized, Double‐Blind, Placebo‐Controlled Comparative Trial of Fluticasone Propionate 440mcg BID or 880mcg BID versus Placebo Administered via Metered‐Dose Inhaler in Propellant 11/12 or GR106642X in Adolescent and Adult Oral Corticosteroid Dependent Asthmatics. http://ctr.gsk.co.uk 2005.

FLTA3022a {unpublished data only}

FLTA3022. A Randomized, Double‐Blind, Placebo‐Controlled Comparative Trial of Fluticasone Propionate 440mcg BID or 880mcg BID versus Placebo Administered via Metered‐Dose Inhaler in Propellant 11/12 or GR106642X in Adolescent and Adult Oral Corticosteroid Dependent Asthmatics. http://ctr.gsk.co.uk 2005.

Galant 1996 {published data only}

Galant SP, Lawrence M, Meltzer EO, Tomasko M, Baker KA, Kellerman DJ. Fluticasone propionate compared with theophylline for mild‐to‐moderate asthma. Annals of Allergy Asthma & Immunology 1996;77(2):112‐8.

Gershman 2000 {published data only}

Gershman NH, Wong HH, Liu JT, Fahy JV. Low‐ and high‐dose fluticasone propionate in asthma; effects during and after treatment. European Respiratory Journal 2000;15(1):11‐8.

Giannini 2003 {published data only}

Giannini D, Di Franco A, Bacci E, Bartoli ML, Carnevali S, Cianchetti S, et al. Different doses of inhaled fluticasone propionate FP in the management of moderate asthmatic subjects. Annual Thoracic Society 97th International Conference; San Francisco CA ,May 18‐23; www.abstracts2view.com 2001.
Giannini D, Di Franco A, Tonelli M, Bartoli ML, Carnevali S, Cianchetti S. Fifty mug b.i.d. of inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP) are effective in stable asthmatics previously treated with a higher dose of FP. Respiratory Medicine 2003;97(5):463‐7.

Hofstra 2000 {published data only}

Hofstra WB, Neijens HJ, Duiverman EJ, Kouwenberg JM, Mulder PG, Kuethe MC, Sterk PJ. Dose‐responses over time to inhaled fluticasone propionate treatment of exercise‐ and methacholine‐induced bronchoconstriction in children with asthma. Pediatric Pulmonology 2000;29(6):415‐23.
Hofstra WB, Sterk PJ, Neijens HJ, Kuethe MC, Mulder PGH, Duiverman EJ. The effect of 24 weeks treatment with 100 mcg or 250 mcg b.d. fluticasone propionate in reducing exercise‐induced bronchoconstriction in childhood asthma. American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine 1997;155(4 (pt 2)):A267.

Ind 2003 {published data only}

Ind PW, Dal Negro R, Colman N, Fletcher CP, Browning DC, James MH. Inhaled fluticasone propionate and salmeterol in moderate adult asthma I: lung function and symptoms. American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine 1998;157(3):A416.
Ind PW, Dal Negro R, Colman NC, Fletcher CP, Browning D, James MH. Addition of salmeterol to fluticasone propionate treatment in moderate‐ to‐severe asthma. Respiratory Medicine 2003;97(5):555‐62.
Ind PW, Dal Negro R, Fletcher CP, Browning DC, James MH. Inhaled salmeterol and fluticasone propionate therapy in moderate adult asthma. European Respiratory Journal 1997;10(Suppl 25):1S.
SLGQ97. http://ctr.gsk.co.uk2005.

Katz 1998 {published data only}

FLIT85. http://ctr.gsk.co.uk2005.
Katz Y, Lebas FX, Medley HV, Robson R. Fluticasone propionate 50 micrograms BID versus 100 micrograms BID in the treatment of children with persistent asthma. Fluticasone Propionate Study Group. Clinical Therapeutics 1998;20(3):424‐37.

Kemp 2004 {published data only}

FLTA3001. http://ctr.gsk.co.uk2005.
Kemp JP, Osur S, Shrewsbury SB, Herje NE, Duke SP, Harding SM, et al. Potential effects of fluticasone propionate on bone mineral density in patients with asthma: a 2‐year randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2004;79(4):458‐66.
Osur S, Chervinsky P, Herie N, Harding S, Kellerman D. Long term effects of fluticasone propionate (FP) inhalation aerosol in subjects with asthma. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 1998;157(Suppl 3):A405.

Lawrence 1997 {published data only}

Lawrence M, Wolfe J, Webb DR, Chervinsky P, Kellerman D, Schaumberg JP, Shah T. Efficacy of inhaled fluticasone propionate in asthma results from topical and not from systemic activity. American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine 1997;156(3 Pt 1):744‐51.
Nielsen K, Okamoto L, Shah T. Importance of selected inhaler characteristics and acceptance of a new breath‐actuated powder inhalation device. Journal of Asthma 1997;34(3):249‐53.

Li 1999 {published data only}

Li JTC, Goldstein MF, Gross GN, Noonan MJ, Weisberg S, Edwards L, et al. Effects of fluticasone propionate, triamcinalone acetonide, prednisolone, and placebo on the hypothalamic‐pituatary axis. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 1999;103(4):622‐9.

Lumry 2006 {published data only}

FAP3007. A randomized, double‐blind, parallel‐group, placebo‐controlled 12‐week trial of inhaled fluticasone propionate 88mcg BID, 220mcg BID, and 440mcg BID versus placebo in propellant GR106642X in adolescent and adult subjects with asthma who are maintained on inhaled corticosteroid therapy. http://ctr.gsk.co.uk2005.
Lumry WR, Conway MM, LaForce CF, Pearlman DS, Scott CA, Herje NE, et al. Fluticasone propionate hydrofluoroalkane inhalation aerosol in patients receiving inhaled corticosteroids. Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology 2006;96(1):51‐9.
Nielsen K, Herje N, Wu W. Inhaled fluticasone propionate via metered‐dose inhaler with alternate propellant improves asthma‐related quality of life. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2002;165(Suppl 8):A107.
Pearlman D, Kerwin E, Kim K, Murray A, Fischer T, Wu W, et al. Fluticasone propionate HFA‐134 A significantly improves asthma control in inhaled corticosteroid dependent asthmatics. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2002;165(Suppl 8):A770.

Meijer 1999 {published data only}

Meijer RJ, Kerstjens HA, Arends LR, Kauffman HF, Koeter GH, Postma DS. Effects of inhaled fluticasone and oral prednisolone on clinical and inflammatory parameters in patients with asthma. Thorax 1999;54(10):894‐9.

Nathan 2000 {published data only}

FLTA2016. http://ctr.gsk.co.uk2005.
Nathan RA, Li JTC, Finn A, Jones R, Payne E, Wolford JP, et al. A dose ranging study of fluticasone propionate administered once daily via multidose powder inhaler to patients with moderate asthma. Chest 2000;118(2):296‐302.

Nelson 1999 {published data only}

FLTA2002. http://ctr.gsk.co.uk2005.
Nelson HS, Busse WW, deBoisblanc BP, Berger WE, Noonan MJ, Webb DR, Wolford JP, Mahajan PS, Hamedani AG, Shah T, Harding SM. Fluticasone propionate powder: oral corticosteroid‐sparing effect and improved lung function and quality of life in patients with severe chronic asthma. Journal of Allergy & Clinical Immunology 1999;103(2 Pt 1):267‐75.
Nimmagadda SR, Spahn JD, Nelson HS, Jenkins J, Szefler SJ, Leung DY. Fluticasone propionate results in improved glucocorticoid receptor binding affinity and reduced oral glucocorticoid requirements in severe asthma. Annals of Allergy Asthma & Immunology 1998;81(1):35‐40.

Nieto 2001 {published data only}

Nieto ML, De Diego A, Perpina M, Compte L, Macian V. Are bronchial hyperresponsiveness and exhaled nitric oxide related in asthma? Effects of fluticasone. European Respiratory Journal 2001;18(Supp 33):335s.

Noonan 1995 {published data only}

Noonan M, Chervinsky P, Busse WW, Weisberg SC, Pinnas J, de Boisblanc BP, Boltansky H, Pearlman D, Repsher L, Kellerman D. Fluticasone propionate reduces oral prednisone use while it improves asthma control and quality of life. American Journal of Respiratory & Critcal Care Medicine 1995;152(5 Pt 1):1467‐73.
Okamoto LJ, Noonan M, DeBoisblanc BP, Kellerman DJ. Fluticasone propionate improves quality of life in patients with asthma requiring oral corticosteroids. Annals of Allergy Asthma & Immunology 1996;76(5):455‐61.

Noonan 1998 {published data only}

Noonan MJ, Chervinsky P, Wolfe J, Liddle R, Kellerman DJ, Crescenzi KL. Dose‐related response to inhaled fluticasone propionate in patients with methacholine‐induced bronchial hyperresponsiveness: a double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study. Journal of Asthma 1998;35(2):153‐64.

O'Sullivan 2002 {published data only}

O'Sullivan S, Cormican L, Murphy M, Poulter LW, Burke CM. Effects of Varying Doses of Fluticasone Propionate on the Physiology and Bronchial Wall Immunopathology in Mild‐to‐Moderate Asthma. Chest 2002;122(6):1966‐72.

Pauwels 2002 {unpublished data only}

Pauwels RA, Derom E, Van De Velde V, Marissens S, Vincken W. Effects of inhaled ciclesonide and fluticasone propionate on cortisol secretion and PC²° for adenosine in asthma patients. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2002;165(Suppl 8):A768.

Pearlman 1997 {published data only}

Mahajan P, Okamoto LJ, Schaberg A, Kellerman D, Schoenwetter WF. Impact of fluticasone propionate powder on health‐related quality of life in patients with moderate asthma. Journal of Asthma 1997;34(3):227‐34.
Pearlman DS, Noonan MJ, Tashkin DP, Goldstein MF, Hamedani AG, Kellerman DJ, Schaberg A. Comparative efficacy and safety of twice daily fluticasone propionate powder versus placebo in the treatment of moderate asthma. Annals of Allergy Asthma & Immunology 1997;78(4):356‐62.

Pearlman 1999 {published data only}

FLTA3015. http://ctr.gsk.co.uk. 2005.
Pearlman DS, Stricker W, Weinstein S, Gross G, Chervinsky P, Woodring A, et al. Inhaled salmeterol and fluticasone: a study comparing monotherapy and combination therapy in asthma. Annals of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology 1999;82(3):257‐65.

Peden 1998 {published data only}

FLTA2006. http://ctr.gsk.co.uk2005.
Noonan M, Berger W, Thomas R, Pinnas A, Nayak A, Hendricks V, et al. Inhaled fluticasone propionate dry powder administered via Diskus or Diskhaler is safe and effective in pediatric patients with chronic asthma. European Respiratory Journal 1997;10(Suppl 25):221S.
Peden DB, Berger WE, Noonan MJ, Thomas MR, Hendricks VL, Hamedani AG, et al. Inhaled fluticasone propionate delivered by means of two different multidose powder inhalers is effective and safe in a large pediatric population with persistent asthma. Journal of Allergy & Clinical Immunology 1998;102(1):32‐8.

Peden 1998a {published data only}

FLTA2006. http://ctr.gsk.co.uk2005.
Noonan M, Berger W, Thomas R, Pinnas A, Nayak A, Hendricks V, et al. Inhaled fluticasone propionate dry powder administered via Diskus or Diskhaler is safe and effective in pediatric patients with chronic asthma. European Respiratory Journal 1997;10(Suppl 25):221S.
Peden DB, Berger WE, Noonan MJ, Thomas MR, Hendricks VL, Hamedani AG, et al. Inhaled fluticasone propionate delivered by means of two different multidose powder inhalers is effective and safe in a large pediatric population with persistent asthma. Journal of Allergy & Clinical Immunology 1998;102(1):32‐8.

Pinnas 2005 {published and unpublished data}

FAP3008. A randomized, double‐blind, parallel group, placebo‐controlled 12‐week trial of inhaled fluticasone propionate 88mcg BID, 220mcg BID, and 440mcg BID versus placebo in propellant GR106642X in adolescent and adult subjects with asthma who are maintained on bronchodilator therapy. www.clinicalstudyresults.org.
Pinnas JL, Noonan MJ, Weinstein SF, Chervinsky P, Scott CA, Herje NE, et al. Fluticasone propionate HFA‐134a pressurized metered‐dose inhaler in adolescents and adults with moderate to severe asthma. Journal of Asthma 2005;42(10):865‐71.
Weinstein S, Korenblat P, Raphael G. Fluticasone propionate HFA 134‐a significantly improves asthma control in inhaled corticosteroid naïve asthmatics. American Journal of Respiratory Critical Care Medicine 2002;165(8):A770.

Raphael 1999 {published data only}

Raphael GD, Lanier RQ, Baker J, Edwards L, Rickard K, Lincourt WR. A comparison of multiple doses of fluticasone propionate and beclomethasone dipropionate in subjects with persistent asthma. Journal of Allergy & Clinical Immunology 1999;103(5 Pt 1):796‐803.

SAM40012 {unpublished data only}

SAM40012. www.clinicalstudyresults.org2001.

Sheffer 1996 {published data only}

Sheffer AL, LaForce C, Chervinsky P, Pearlman D, Schaberg A. Fluticasone propionate aerosol: efficacy in patients with mild to moderate asthma. Fluticasone Propionate Asthma Study Group. Journal of Family Practice 1996;42(4):369‐75.

Sorkness 1999 {published data only}

Sorkness CA, LaForce C, Storms W, Lincourt WR, Edwards L, Rogenes PR. Effects of the inhaled corticosteroids fluticasone propionate, triamcinolone acetonide, and flunisolide and oral prednisone on the hypothalamic‐pituitary‐adrenal axis in adult patients with asthma. Clinical Therapeutics 1999;21(2):353‐67.

Sorkness 1999a {published data only}

Sorkness CA, LaForce C, Storms W, Lincourt WR, Edwards L, Rogenes PR. Effects of the inhaled corticosteroids fluticasone propionate, triamcinolone acetonide, and flunisolide and oral prednisolone on the hypothalamic‐pituitary‐adrenal axis in adult patients with asthma. Clinical Therapeutics 1999;21(2):353‐67.

Verona 2003 {published data only}

FAS30006. http://ctr.gsk.co.uk2005.
Verona E, Petrov D, Cserhati E, Hofman J, Geppe N, Davies P. A long term study to compare the safety and efficacy of Fluticasone Propionate (FP) 200mcg/day with 400mcg/day in asthmatic children aged 4‐11 years. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 2001;107(2):s105.
Verona E, Petrov D, Cserhati E, Hofman J, Geppe N, Davies P. Fluticasone propionate in asthmatic children:a long term dose comparison of safety and efficacy. European Respiratory Journal 2001;18(Suppl 33):288s.
Verona E, Petrov D, Cserhati E, Hofman J, Geppe N, Medley H, et al. Fluticasone propionate in asthma: a long term dose comparison study. Archives of Disease in Childhood 2003;88(6):503‐9.

Wallin 2003 {published data only}

Wallin A, Sue‐Chu M, Bjermer L, Ward J, Sandstrom T, Lindberg A, et al. Effect of inhaled fluticasone with and without salmeterol on airway inflammation in asthma. Journal of Allergy & Clinical Immunology 2003;112(1):72‐8.
Wilson SJ, Ward JA, Djukanovic R, Wallin A, Sue‐Chu M, Sandstrom T, et al. Effects of high and low dose inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP) compared to low dose FP combined with salmeterol (SAL) on airway inflammation in asthma. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2000;161(Suppl 3):A196.

Wasserman 1996 {published data only}

Wasserman SI, Gross GN, Schoenwetter WF, Munk ZM, Kral KM, Schaberg A, Kellerman DJ. A 12‐week dose‐ranging study of fluticasone propionate powder in the treatment of asthma. Journal of Asthma 1996;33(4):265‐74.

Wolfe 1996 {published data only}

Wolfe JD, Selner JC, Mendelson LM, Hampel FJr, Schaberg A. Effectiveness of fluticasone propionate in patients with moderate asthma: a dose‐ranging study. Clinical Therapeutics 1996;18(4):635‐46.

References to studies excluded from this review

Ayres 2000 {published data only}

Ayres JG, Millar AB, Sykes AP. Clinical efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate 1 mg twice daily administered via a HFA 134a pressurized metered dose inhaler to patients with severe asthma. Respiratory Medicine. 2000;94(Suppl B):S42‐50.

Bisgaard 1999 {published data only}

Bisgaard H. Efficacy of inhaled fluticasone propionate in the treatment of young children with asthmatic symptoms: a dose comparison study. American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine 1998;157(3):A711.
Bisgaard H, Gillies J, Groenewald M, Maden C. The effect of inhaled fluticasone propionate in the treatment of young asthmatic children: a dose comparison study. American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine 1999;160(1):126‐31.

Dorini 2001 {published data only}

Dorini S, Pelucchi A, Leone C, Mastropasqua B, Guarnieri R, Chetta A, et al. Eosinophil apoptosis in induced sputum (IS) from patients with mild symptomatic asthma during treatment with Fluticasone propionate (FP). European Respiratory Journal 2001;18(Suppl 33):337s.

FLTA2007 {unpublished data only}

FLTA2007. http://ctr.gsk.co.uk.

Fowler 2002 {published data only}

Fowler SJ, Orr LC, Sims EJ, Wilson AM, Currie GP, McFarlane L, et al. Therapeutic ratio of hydrofluoroalkane and chlorofluorocarbon formulations of fluticasone propionate. Chest 2002;122(2):618‐23.

Harrison 2001 {published data only}

Harrison TW, Wisnieswki A, Honour J, Tattersfield AE. Comparison of the systemic effects of fluticasone propionate and budesonide given by dry powder inhaler in healthy and asthmatic subjects. Thorax 2001;56:186‐91.

Kelly 2001 {unpublished data only}

Kelly MM, Leigh R, Parameswaran K, Jayaram L, Belda J, Goodwin S, et al. Establishing dose response and relative potencies of inhaled corticosteroids. Annual Thoracic Society 97th International Conference; San Francisco CA, May 18‐23. 2001.

Laforce 2000 {published data only}

Laforce CF, Pearlman DS, Ruff ME, Silvers WS, Weinstein SW, Clements DS, et al. Efficacy and safety of dry powder fluticasone propionate in children with persistent asthma. Annals of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology 2000;85(5):407‐15.

Lipworth 1997 {published data only}

Lipworth BJ, Clark DJ, McFarlane LC. Adrenocortical activity with repeated twice daily dosing of fluticasone propionate and budesonide given via a large volume spacer to asthmatic school children. Thorax 1997;52(8):686‐9.

Lundback 1993 {published data only}

Lundback B, Alexander M, Day J, Hebert J, Holzer R, Van Uffelen R, et al. Evaluation of fluticasone propionate (500 micrograms day‐1) administered either as dry powder via a Diskhaler inhaler or pressurized inhaler and compared with beclomethasone dipropionate (1000 micrograms day‐1) administered by pressurized inhaler. Respiratory Medicine 1993;87:609‐20.

Lundback 1994 {published data only}

Lundback B, Dahl R, De Jonghe M, Hyldebrandt N, Valta R, Payne SL. A comparison of fluticasone propionate when delivered by either the metered‐dose inhaler or the Diskhaler in the treatment of mild‐to‐moderate asthma. European Journal of Clinical Research 1994;5:11‐19.

Medici 2000 {published data only}

Medici TC, Grebski E, Häcki M, Rüegsegger P, Maden C, Efthimiou J. Effect of one year treatment with inhaled fluticasone propionate or beclomethasone dipropionate on bone density and bone metabolism: a randomised parallel group study in adult asthmatic subjects. Thorax 2000;55:375‐82.
Medici TG, Grebski E, Hacki M, Ruegsegger P, Maden C, Efthimiou J. One‐year treatment with inhaled fluticasone propionate or beclomethasone dipropionate does not affect bone density and bone metabolism. A randomised, parallel group study in adult asthmatics. American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine 1998;157:A407.

Murray 1998 {unpublished data only}

Murray JJ, Friedman B, Chervinsky P, Fogarty C, Baker JW, Rogenes PR, et al. Fluticasone propionate (FP) is more effective than higher doses of beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) in patients with moderate asthma. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 1998;157(Suppl 3):A407.

Pieters 1998 {published data only}

Pieters WR, Stallaert RA, Prins J, Greefhorst AP, Bosman HG, van Uffelen R, et al. A study on the clinical equivalence and patient preference of fluticasone propionate 250 mcg twice daily via the Diskus/Accuhaler inhaler or the Diskhaler in adult asthmatic patients. Journal of Asthma 1998;35(4):337‐45.

Visser 2001 {published and unpublished data}

Visser MJ, Brand PLP, Kamps AWA, Duiverman EJ, Kauffman HF, Postma DS. One year treatment with different schedules of inhaled fluticasone propionate in childhood asthma: effects on lung function and immunological parameters. Annual Thoracic Society 97th International Conference; San Francisco CA ,May 18‐23; www.abstracts2view.com 2001.
Visser MJ, Duiverman EJ, Postma DS, Arends LR, Brand PLP. High doses of inhaled fluticasone propionate dose‐dependently suppress adrenal cortical function in asthmatic children. European Respiratory Journal 2001;18(Supp 33):290s.
Visser MJ, Postma DS, Arends LR, De Vries TW, Duiverman EJ, Brand PL. One‐year treatment with different dosing schedules of fluticasone propionate in childhood asthma. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2001;164:2073‐7.
Visser MJ, Postma DS, Duiverman EJ, Arends LR, Kauffman HF, Brand PLP. Influence of fluticasone propionate on levels of exhaled nitric oxide in asthmatic children: a dose response study. European Respiratory Journal 2001;18(Supp 33):40s.

Wittmann 1999 {unpublished data only}

Wittmann M, Thomas A, Petro W. Does doubling the inhaled steroid dosage at the beginning of an asthma therapy lead to a faster improvement of pathology or pulmonary function? [Führt die Verdopplung der inhalativen Steroiddosis zu Beginn einer Asthmatherapie zu enier schnelleren Verbesserung von Symptomatik oder Lungenfunktion?]. Pneumologie 1999;53(SH1).

Wolfe 2000 {published data only}

Stanford R, Wightman D, Lincourt W, Edwards L, Crim C. Patient satisfaction with fluticasone propionate 250µg once daily. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2002;165(Suppl 8):A769.
Wolfe J, Rooklin A, Grady J, Munk ZM, Stevens A, Prillaman B, et al. Comparison of once‐ and twice‐daily dosing of fluticasone propionate 200 micrograms per day administered by diskus device in patients with asthma treated with or without inhaled corticosteroids. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 2000;105(6 pt 1):1153‐61.

ZuWallack 2000 {published data only}

ZuWallack R, Adelglass J, Clifford DP, Duke SP, Wire PD, Faris M, Harding SM. Long‐term efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate powder administered once or twice daily via inhaler to patients with moderate asthma. Chest 2000;118(2):303‐12.

References to studies awaiting assessment

Bukovskis 2005 {published data only}

Bukovskis M, Jurka N. Increase of neutrophil leukocyte count in induced sputum in patients on the treatment with high dose inhaled steroids [Abstract 303]. XIX World Allergy Organization Congress. 2005.

Osur 1998 {unpublished data only}

Osur S, Chervinsky P, Herie N, Harding S, Kellerman D. Long term effects of fluticasone propionate (FP) inhalation aerosol in subjects with asthma. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 1998;157(Suppl 3):A405.

Adams 2008

Adams NP, Bestall JC, Lasserson TJ, Jones PW. Inhaled fluticasone propionate versus placebo for chronic asthma in adults and children. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2008, Issue 4.

Ayres 2000

Ayres JG, Millar AB, Sykes AP. [Clinical efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate 1 mg twice daily administered via a HFA 134a pressurized metered dose inhaler to patients with severe asthma. U.K. study group]. Respiratory Medicine 2000;94(Suppl B):S42‐50.

BTS 1997

British Thoracic Society. The British guidelines on asthma management 1995 review and position statement. Thorax 1997;52(Suppl 1):S1‐20.

BTS 2003

The British Thoracic Society/Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. British Guideline on the Management of Asthma. Thorax 2003;58(Suppl 1).

Cates 2008

Cates CJ, Cates MJ. Regular treatment with salmeterol for chronic asthma: serious adverse events. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2008, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006363.pub2]

Egger 2001

Egger M, Davey Smith G, Altman DG. Systematic Reviews in Healthcare: Meta‐analysis in Context. BMJ Books, 2001.

GINA 1995

National Asthma Education and Prevention Program. Global initiative for asthma management and prevention NHBLI/WHO workshop report. National Institute of Health, Bethseda, MD1995, issue NIH Publication No. 95‐3659.

Gross 1999

Gross G, Thompson PJ, Chervinsky P, Vanden Burgt J. [Hydrofluoroalkane‐134a beclomethasone dipropionate, 400 mug, is as effective as chlorofluorocarbon beclomethasone dipropionate, 800 mug, for the treatment of moderate asthma]. Chest 1999;115(2):343‐51.

NHLBI 1997

National Asthma Education and Prevention Program. Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Managment of Asthma, Expert Panel Report No. 2. Bethesda MD: NIH/National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute1997, issue NIH Publication No. 97‐4051.

Tattersfield 2004

Tattersfield AE, Harrison TW, Hubbard RB, Mortimer K. Safety of inhaled corticosteroids. Proceedings of the American Thoracic Society 2004;1:171‐5.

Characteristics of studies

Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]

Agertoft 1997

Methods

Setting: Denmark, paediatric outpatient clinic Design: crossover, 2 week washout Length of intervention period: 2 weeks Randomisation: yes, computer generated random sequence with balanced blocks Masking: double‐blind Excluded: stated (none) Withdrawals: stated (one child from low dose group due to sore throat) Baseline characteristics: comparable between groups Jadad score: 5

Participants

48 children: 27M 21F Age range: 6‐12 years Inclusion criteria: Pre‐pubertal children 'Mild' asthma requiring treatment with as needed beta2 agonists only Exclusion criteria: Inhaled or oral steroid use in last 2 months

Interventions

1. FP 200mcg/d

2. FP 400mcg/d

Delivery device: Accuhaler DPI

Outcomes

FEV1 Morning PEFR Evening PEFR Daily asthma symptom score Daily use of beta2agonist 24 hour urinary cortisol excretion Growth by lower leg knemometry

Notes

Patients also received BUD and placebo in a randomised fashion: results not considered in this review

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Low risk

Computer generated random sequence with balanced blocks

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

See Appendix 2

Blinding?
All outcomes

Low risk

Identical inhaler devices

Allen 1998

Methods

Setting: multicentre study USA, paediatric outpatient clinic
Length of intervention period: 12 months
Randomisation: yes, method not stated
Allocation concealment: yes (randomisation code generated off site and concealed using sealed envelopes)
Design: parallel group
Masking: double blind
Excluded: stated
Withdrawals: stated
Baseline characteristics: comparable
Jadad score: 3

Participants

344 children enrolled, 325 randomised: 81M 244F Age range: M 4‐11 years, F 4‐9 years ) Inclusion criteria: Pre‐pubescent children with mild to moderate asthma (ATS criteria 1987) for at least 3 months FEV1 60 (% predicted) or greater Exclusion criteria: Systemic, intra‐nasal or opthalmic corticosteroids in last month More than 60 days of systemic corticosteroid use in last 2 years

Interventions

1. FP 50 mcg 2xdaily (100 mcg/d)

2. FP 100 mcg 2xdaily (200 mcg/d)

Delivery device: Diskhaler DPI

Outcomes

Height assessment
HRQOL: Functional Status IIR (FSII) questionnaire, Sleep Scale Children (SLP‐C) questionnaire, Quality of Life of Parents of Asthmatic Children Questionniare (QOL‐PAC)
Oral corticosteroids for asthma exacerbation (No. of courses or prednisolone)
Withdrawal due to asthma exacerbation
Oro‐pharyngeal side effects

Notes

Authors confirmed use of allocation concealment

Criteria for withdrawal due to lack of efficacy: requirement for more than two seven day courses of oral corticosteroid

Placebo treatment arm also included: results not considered in this review

Data available from www.clinicalstudyresults.org

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Low risk

See Appendix 2

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

Randomisation code generated off site and concealed using sealed envelopes

Blinding?
All outcomes

Low risk

Double blind; identical inhaler devices

Allen 2000

Methods

Randomised, double‐blind parallel group trial.

Withdrawals: not stated.

Jadad score: 2

Participants

N = 111. Distribution between groups not clear. Mean FEV1: 61%

Inclusion criteria: adolescent/adult asthmatics; OCS dependent

Exclusion criteria: not clear

Interventions

i) FP 1000mcg BiD (2000); ii) FP500mcg BiD (1000); iii) Placebo. Inhaler device: Diskus. Study duration: 52 weeks.

Outcomes

Steroid consumption; lung function; adverse events

Notes

Conference abstract

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Unclear risk

Described as randomised; no other information available

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

Information not available

Blinding?
All outcomes

Low risk

Double blind; identical inhaler devices

Ayres 1995

Methods

Setting: multicentre study worldwide, hospital outpatient clinics
Design: parallel group
Length of intervention period: 6 weeks
Randomisation: computer generated random sequence
Allocation concealment: yes (central coding by pharmaceutical company sponsor)
Masking: double blind
Withdrawals: adverse event rates reported, unclear if any led to patient withdrawal
Baseline characteristics: comparable between groups
Jadad score: 3

Participants

862 adults enrolled, 671 randomised
Age range: 18‐70 years
Inclusion criteria:
Adults with a clinical history of severe asthma
Requiring BDP 1‐2 mg/d or BUD 0.8‐1.6 mg/d BUD for asthma control
During run‐in period:
Asthma symptom scores of 1 or more on 4 out of last 7 days and either:
1. At least 15% reversibility FEV1 post beta2 agonist or:
2. Diurnal variation in PEFR 15% or greater on 4 out of last 7 days or:
3. Need for 2 or more doses beta2 agonist each of last 7 days with either a). % predicted FEV1 80% or greater b) Mean morning PEFR 80% or greater in last 7 days
Exclusion criteria:
Alteration of normal asthma medication during run‐in period
Hospital admission due to asthma exacerbation in last month
Systemic corticosteroids > 10mg daily
Suspected of being steroid hypersensitive
Concomitant disease likely to complicate evaluation of drug
Current smokers

Interventions

1. FP 125 mcg 4 puffs 2xdaily (1000 mcg/d)

2. FP 250 mcg 4 puffs 2xdaily (2000 mcg/d)

Delivery device: MDI +/‐ spacer

Outcomes

Outcomes reported as change compared to baseline:

FEV1
FVC
Clinic PEFR
Morning PEFR
Evening PEFR
Diurnal variation in PEFR
Symptom free days
Symptom free nights
Rescue beta2 agonist free days
Asthma exacerbations
Morning plasma cortisol

Biochemical markers of bone turnover

Notes

Details concerning randomisation method provided by Glaxo Wellcome

12.5% of patients randomised to FP treatment arms receiving oral prednisolone (< 10mg/d) at the time of enrolment. No attempt was made to reduce dose in these patients

Patients were given the option of using spacer device

BUD treatment arm also included: results not considered in this review

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Low risk

Computer generated random sequence

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

Central coding by pharmaceutical company sponsor)

Blinding?
All outcomes

Low risk

Double blind; identical inhaler devices

Boner 1999

Methods

Setting: multicentre study Europe and New Zealand
Length of intervention period: 6 weeks
Randomisation: yes, method not stated
Allocation concealment: not stated
Design: parallel group
Masking: no details
Excluded: no details
Withdrawals: no details
Baseline characteristics: no details
Jadad score: 1

Participants

89 children
Age range: 5‐16 years
Inclusion criteria:
Children with asthma, no further details
Exclusion criteria:
No details

Interventions

1. FP 200 mcg/d

2. FP 400 mcg/d

Delivery device: no details

Outcomes

Methacholine BHR (PC20 FEV1)
FEV1

Notes

Study presented in abstract form only

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Unclear risk

Described as randomised; no other information available

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

Information not available

Blinding?
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Information not available

Bukovskis 2002

Methods

Randomised, double‐blind parallel group trial. Method of randomisation: not reported

Withdrawals: not stated

Jadad score: 2

Participants

N=19 (FP500: N: 10; FP100: N: 9)

Interventions

FP100 v FP500. Inhaler device not specified. Study duration: 24 weeks. Inhaler device: unclear.

Outcomes

FEV1; PD20; am/pm PEF; ß‐2 agonist use; symptoms; blood eosinophils; sputum cell count;

Notes

Conference abstract

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Unclear risk

Described as randomised; no other information available

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

Information not available

Blinding?
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Information not available

Casale 2001

Methods

Multicentre, single‐blind, randomised open label controlled trial. Method of randomisation not reported. Open label study with exception of flunisolide and placebo treatment groups. Withdrawals not described.

Jadad score: 1

Participants

N=78 (PLA: 15; FP110: 14; FP220: 12; FP330: 20; FP440: 17); Mean age (SD): PLA: 31.5 (10.09); FP110: 36.1 (8.70); FP220: 32.2 (8.66); FP330: 29.1 (8.66); FP440: 29.4 (10.20); M/F (%): PLA: 47/53; FP110: 57/43; FP220: 50/50; FP330: 40/60; FP440: 35/65; Mean FEV1 (SD): PLA: 3.0 (0.66); FP110: 3.3 (0.86); FP220: 3.2 (0.67); FP330: 3.0 (0.69); FP440: 3.2 (0.77)

Inclusion criteria: non‐smokers; 18‐50 years; diagnosis of persistent mild to moderate asthma confirmed within previous 12 months by response to SABA (increase in FEV1 >/= 12%)/methacholine challenge <8mg/mL); FEV1 >/=65% predicted; no OCS/nasal/ICS use in previous 6 months

Exclusion criteria: significant pulmonary disease (e.g. COPD); exacerbation within 6 weeks; URTI within 30 days screening; oestrogen usage; current condition that might confound data interpretation

Interventions

PLA versus FP220 versus FP440 versus FP660 versus FP880 . Study duration: 3 weeks. Inhaler device: pMDI

Outcomes

HPA function

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Unclear risk

Described as randomised; no other information available

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

Information not available

Blinding?
All outcomes

Low risk

Identical inhaler devices

Chervinsky 1994

Methods

Setting: multicentre study USA, hospital outpatient clinic
Length of intervention period: 8 weeks
Randomisation: yes, method not stated
Allocation concealment: unclear
Design: parallel group
Masking: double blind
Excluded: stated
Withdrawals: stated
Baseline characteristics: comparable
Jadad score: 3

Participants

331 adults Mean age: 48‐59 years Inclusion criteria: Mild to moderate asthma (as defined by the Committee on Diagnositic standards for Non‐Tuberculous Respiratory Diseases 1962) Treatment with BDP for at least 1 month prior to study and daily beta2 agonist, or daily theophylline for at least 2 weeks prior to study FEV1 60‐90 (% predicted) Exclusion criteria: Not stated

Interventions

1. FP 50 mcg 2xdaily (100 mcg/d)

2. FP 100 mcg 2xdaily (200mcg/d)

3. FP 500 mcg 2xdaily (1000 mcg/d)

Delivery device: MDI

Outcomes

Probability of remaining in study

All outcomes expressed as change compared to baseline:
FEV1
FVC
FEF25‐75
Morning PEFR
Evening PEFR
Daily symptom score
Daily beta2 agonist use
Night awakenings
Morning plasma cortisol
Urinary free cortisol
Plasma cortisol 60 min post ACTH

Physician‐rated global assessment of efficacy
Oropharyngeal side‐effects

Notes

No reply from author to clarify details of randomisation method

For continuous outcomes change scores from baseline to endpoint (i.e. point of withdrawal) were reported

A priori criteria for withdrawal due to lack of efficacy were established based on FEV1, morning PEFR, night‐time awakenings or clinical exacerbation requiring emergency hospital treatment

Placebo treatment arm also included: results not considered in this review

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Low risk

See Appendix 2

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

See Appendix 2

Blinding?
All outcomes

Low risk

Identical inhaler devices

Chetta 2003

Methods

Randomised, double‐blind, parallel group trial. Method of randomisation: not reported. Withdrawals: 12. Non‐ITT

Jadad score: 3

Participants

N=30 randomised. Data only presented on those completing the study. FP100: N=8; FP1000: N=8. Mean age (SD): FP100: 28 (8); FP1000: 26 (8); Atopic (%): 100/100; Mean duration of asthma (years): FP100: 11 (7); FP1000: 13 (9); Mean FEV1 (% predicted): FP100: 100 (SD 18); FP1000: 110 (22); Asthma severity score: FP100: 7 (2); FP1000: 6 (2).

Inclusion criteria: mild to moderate asthma; well‐documented history of asthma; baseline FEV1>70% predicted

Exclusion criteria: exacerbations within 2 months; CS within 6 months of study; free from respiratory infections in 4 weeks prior to study

Interventions

FP100 (BID) versus FP500 (BID). Inhaler device: pMDI + spacer. Study duration: 6 weeks

Outcomes

PD20; FEV1; Mast cells; eosinophils; vessels; membrane thickness; vascular area

Notes

High attrition rate

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Unclear risk

Described as randomised; no other information available

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

Information not available

Blinding?
All outcomes

Low risk

Identical inhaler devices

Dahl 1993

Methods

Setting: world‐wide multicentre study, hospital outpatient clinic Design: parallel group Length of intervention period: 4 weeks Randomisation: yes, computer generated sequence Allocation concealment: yes (central coding by pharmaceutical company sponsors) Masking: double blind Excluded: not stated Withdrawals: stated Baseline characteristics: comparable Jadad score: 4

Participants

825 adults: 297M 528F Age range: 17‐74 years Inclusion criteria: Adults with moderately severe chronic asthma requiring BDP 1000 mcg/d or less. During run‐in period: Daytime or night‐time symptoms during at least 4 days or: Diurnal variation in PEFR of 20% or more Exclusion criteria: Systemic steroids within the last month Serious concurrent disease Baseline asthma control: See inclusion criteria

Interventions

1. FP 100 mcg/d

2. FP 200 mcg/d

3. FP 400 mcg/d

4. FP 800 mcg/d

Delivery device: MDI

Outcomes

Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline
Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline
Diurnal variation in PEFR
FEV1 (% predicted)
FVC
% symptom free days
Rescue beta2 agonist use (puffs/day)
Plasma cortisol
Plasma cortisol 30 mins after 250 mcg ACTH
Incidence of oral candidiasis
Incidence of oropharyngeal side effects

Notes

Details of randomisation method and SD values for FEV1 (% predicted) provided by Glaxo Wellcome

A BDP treatment arm also included: results not considered in this review

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Low risk

See Appendix 2

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

See Appendix 2

Blinding?
All outcomes

Low risk

Identical inhaler devices

Derom 1999

Methods

Randomised, crossover double‐blind, placebo controlled trial. Withdrawals stated. Non‐ITT. Jadad score: 3

Participants

N = 23. 8F; Mean age: 33 (19‐57); FEV1: 2.95 (SD 0.83) (FEV1 % predicted: 80.0 (SD 21.4)); Mean FVC: 4.42 L (SD 0.94).

Inclusion criteria: either sex; 18‐60 years of age; ATS defined asthma; >/=40% predicted value; Either post‐BD increase in FEV1 of at least 200ml or >/=12% of baseline, OR diurnal variation of PEF >/=15% on at least 2 days/week during run‐in.

Exclusion criteria: Exacerbation 4 weeks before inclusion; use of oral steroids within 4 weeks; use of ICS within 6 months; other systemic steroids within 4 weeks.

Interventions

FP 200mcg; FP 1000mcg; BUD: 200mcg; BUD 800mcg; Placebo administered over 1 week. Inhaler device: DPI

Concomitant therapy: IP, xanthines, sodium cromoglycate permitted provided doses kept at constant level 4 weeks prior to inclusion

Outcomes

FEV1; PEFR; Serum cortisol; White blood cell count; Neutrophils; Basophils

Notes

Data reported for effects after 24hours @ 1 week

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Unclear risk

Described as randomised; other information not available

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

Information not available

Blinding?
All outcomes

Low risk

Identical inhaler devices

Derom 2005

Methods

Randomised double‐blind placebo‐controlled double dummy crossover trial. Jadad score: 2

Participants

N=25

Interventions

FP500 versus FP1000 versus PLA; washout period: 3 weeks. Study duration: 6 treatment periods unclear duration . Inhaler device: unclear

Outcomes

Cortisol suppression; PC20

Notes

Conference abstract

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Unclear risk

Described as randomised; other information not available

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

Information not available

Blinding?
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Information not available

Falcoz 2000

Methods

Randomised, double‐blind, parallel group study, Non‐ITT. Jadad score 3.

Participants

N randomised = 232 (230 evaluable: FP 100mcg: 78; FP 500mcg: 79; Placebo: 73); Mean age 38 years; Participants suffered from mild‐to‐moderate asthma

Inclusion criteria: Mild‐to‐moderate asthma (defined as FEV1 50‐80%)

Exclusion criteria: Not stated

Interventions

1) FP 100mcg
2) FP 500mcg
3) Placebo. Duration 6 weeks. Inhaler device: DPI.

Outcomes

Plasma concentrations

Notes

Data taken only for study 1. Study 2 assessed equal dose of FP given via different inhalers

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Unclear risk

Described as randomised; other information not available

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

Information not available

Blinding?
All outcomes

Low risk

Identical inhaler devices

FAP30001

Methods

Setting: multicentre study in USA
Design: parallel group
Length of intervention period: 26 weeks
Randomisation: yes, method unclear
Allocation concealment: unclear
Masking: double‐blind
Excluded: not stated
Withdrawals: stated
Baseline characteristics: comparable
Jadad score: 3

Participants

N = 182. Mean age: 37‐39.

Inclusion criteria: >12 years; ATS‐defined asthma; FEV1 >/=45% predicted; able to use MDI

Exclusion criteria: History of life threatening asthma; systemic steroids within 6 months of study entry; immunosuppressive agents prior to study entry

Interventions

Run‐in period: 1‐2 weeks

1) FP HFA 220mcg bid (440mcg/d)

2) FPHFA 440mcg bid (880mcg/d)

Inhaler device: MDI

Outcomes

Withdrawals
Change in FEV1 % predicted
Change in FEV1 Litres
Change in am PEF L/min
Change in pm PEF L/min
Change in symptom scores
Change in symptom free days
Change in number of awakenings/nt
Adverse events

Notes

Unpublished study downloaded from www.clinicalstudyresults.org

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Low risk

See Appendix 2

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

See Appendix 2

Blinding?
All outcomes

Low risk

Identical inhaler devices

FLIC15

Methods

Setting: multicentre study in Italy
Design: parallel group
Length of intervention period: 4 weeks
Randomisation: yes, method unclear
Allocation concealment: unclear
Masking: double‐blind
Excluded: not stated
Withdrawals: stated
Baseline characteristics: comparable
Jadad score: 3

Participants

33 participants. Mean age 37‐44 years.

Inclusion criteria: M/F participants; age 18‐60 years; persistent mild‐moderate asthma (ATS).

Exclusion criteria: Preventer medication 4 weeks prior to study entry.

Interventions

Run‐in period: 2 weeks

i) FP100mcg bid (200mcg/d)

ii) FP500mcg bid (1000mcg/d)

iii) Placebo

Inhaler device: DPI

Outcomes

Withdrawals; FEV1; PEFR; FVC

Notes

Unpublished study downloaded from www.clinicalstudyresults.org

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Low risk

See Appendix 2

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

See Appendix 2

Blinding?
All outcomes

Low risk

Identical inhaler devices

FLIP01

Methods

Setting: multicentre study in Belgium, Netherlands, Germany, Switzerland
Design: parallel group
Length of intervention period: 5 weeks
Randomisation: yes, method unclear
Allocation concealment: unclear
Masking: double‐blind
Excluded: not stated
Withdrawals: stated
Baseline characteristics: comparable
Jadad score: 3

Participants

110 participants ‐ age not reported
Inclusion criteria: Moderate asthma (no steroids)

Interventions

i) FP 50mcg/d

ii) FP 100mcg/d

iii) FP 200mcg/d

iv) BDP 100mcg/d

v) BDP 200mcg/d

Inhaler device: MDI

Outcomes

Withdrawals; am & pm PEF; symptoms; adverse events

Notes

Unpublished study

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Low risk

See Appendix 2

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

See Appendix 2

Blinding?
All outcomes

Low risk

Identical inhaler devices

FLIP01a

Methods

As Above

Participants

As above

Interventions

As above

Outcomes

As above

Notes

Unpublished study

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Low risk

As for FLIP01

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

As for FLIP01

Blinding?
All outcomes

Low risk

As for FLIP01

FLIP39

Methods

Setting: multicentre study in Europe
Length of intervention period: 12 weeks
Randomisation: yes, method not stated
Allocation concealment: unclear
Design: parallel group
Masking: double blind
Excluded: not stated
Withdrawals: stated
Baseline characteristics: comparable
Jadad score: 3

Participants

196 children. Median age: 10 (6‐17)

Inclusion criteria: 6‐16 years of age; established history of childhood asthma; perennial symptoms requiring treatment with up to 400mcg/d ICS; history of recurrent episode of bronchoconstriction or cough; and >/=10% reversibility in FEV1 post‐SABA; Prior to randomisation, participants were required to show two fo the following in last 12 days of run‐in period: mean of 4 lowest PEFR </=85% predicted or mean PEFR </=95% predicted; ii) diurnal variation in PEFR at least 20% on >/=4 days; iii) asthma symptoms on >/=4 days; iv) bronchodilator use on at least 2 of 4 days.

Exclusion criteria: systemic CS in previous 4 weeks/run‐in or on >3 times in last 6 months; acute lower RTI in last 14 days that would affect baseline lung function/symptoms

Interventions

2 week run‐in period (200mcg/d BDP) followed by randomisation to:

1. FP 50mcg BID (100mcg/d)

2. FP 100mcg BID (200mcg/d)

Inhaler device: DPI

Outcomes

am PEF
pm PEF
clinic PEF
FEV1
Assessment of efficacy
Symptoms
Rescue medication usage
Adverse events
Withdrawal

Notes

Sourced from http://ctr.gsk.co.uk

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Low risk

See Appendix 2

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

See Appendix 2

Blinding?
All outcomes

Low risk

Identical inhaler devices

FLTA3014

Methods

Setting: 21 centres in USA
Length of intervention period: 26 weeks
Randomisation: yes, method not described
Allocation concealment: unclear
Design: parallel group
Masking: double blind
Excluded: not stated
Withdrawals: stated
Baseline characteristics: comparable
Jadad score: 3

Participants

379 adults and adolescents.
Mean age: 37‐39
Inclusion criteria: >/=12 years; 6 month history of asthma requiring pharmacotherapy; FEV1 50‐85%; use of SABA and/or ICS

Interventions

1. FP 100mcg BID (without spacer)

2. FP250mcg BID (with spacer)

3. FP250mcg BID (without spacer)

4. Placebo (with or without spacer)

Inhaler device: MDI

Outcomes

FEV1; am PEF; pm PEF; withdrawals; SABA usage; symptoms; adverse events; withdrawals

Notes

Sourced from http://ctr.gsk.co.uk

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Low risk

See Appendix 2

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

See Appendix 2

Blinding?
All outcomes

Low risk

Identical inhaler devices

FLTA3020

Methods

Setting: 25 centres in USA
Length of intervention period: 12 weeks
Randomisation: yes, method not described
Allocation concealment: unclear
Design: parallel group
Masking: double blind
Excluded: not stated
Withdrawals: stated
Baseline characteristics: comparable
Jadad score: 3

Participants

191 adults and adolescents
Mean age: 31‐36 years.

Inclusion criteria: >/=12 years; 6 month history of asthma requiring pharmacotherapy; FEV1 50‐85%; use of SABA and/or ICS; pre‐BD FEV1% predicted 60‐90%; SABA prn or regular use only; effective use of MDI.

Exclusion criteria: ICS within 30 days of screening; hospitalisation due to asthma on 2+ occasions in 12 months prior to screening; significant other medication within 30 days of screening

Interventions

1. HFA‐FP 110mcg BID

2. HFA‐FP 220mcg BID

3. CFC‐FP 110mcg BID

4. CFC‐FP 220mcg BID

5. Placebo

Inhaler device: MDI

Outcomes

FEV1; am PEF; pm PEF; withdrawals; symptoms; rescue medication usage; adverse events

Notes

Sourced from www.clinicalstudyresults.org

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Low risk

See Appendix 2

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

See Appendix 2

Blinding?
All outcomes

Low risk

Identical inhaler devices

FLTA3020a

Methods

As above

Participants

As above

Interventions

As above

Outcomes

As above

Notes

As above

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Low risk

As for FLTA3020

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

As for FLTA3020

Blinding?
All outcomes

Low risk

As for FLTA3020

FLTA3022

Methods

Setting: 39 centres in USA
Design: parallel group Length of intervention period: 16 weeks (plus 2 week run‐in)
Randomisation: yes, method not described Masking: double‐blind (identical devices)
Excluded: not stated
Withdrawals: stated (placebo: 22; FP440hfa bid: 6; FP880hfa bid: 13; FP440cfc bid: 6; FP880cfc bid: 8)
Baseline characteristics: comparable between groups
Jadad score: 4

Participants

168 adolescents/adults: 78M/90F Age range: >12 (mean age: 50 years)
Inclusion criteria: 12 years of age or older FEV1 40‐85 (% predicted); oral steroid dependent asthma Exclusion criteria: History of life‐threatening asthma; 3 or more hospitalisations in past year; therapy with antileukotrienes, nedocromil and/or ipratropium bromide within 4 weeks of randomisation

Interventions

1. FP440mcg CFC bid

2. FP880mcg CFC bid

3. FP440mcg HFA bid

4. FP880mcg HFA bid

5. Placebo

Inhaler device: MDI

Outcomes

Oral steroid reduction
FEV1
am PEF
pm PEF
Symptoms
Rescue medication usage
AQLQ
Withdrawals
Adverse events

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Low risk

See Appendix 2

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

See Appendix 2

Blinding?
All outcomes

Low risk

Identical inhaler devices

FLTA3022a

Methods

As above

Participants

As above

Interventions

As above

Outcomes

As above

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Low risk

As for FLTA3022

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

As for FLTA3022

Blinding?
All outcomes

Low risk

As for FLTA3022

Galant 1996

Methods

Setting: multicentre study USA, hospital outpatient clinic
Length of intervention period: 12 weeks
Randomisation: yes, method not stated
Allocation concealment: unclear
Design: parallel group
Masking: double blind
Excluded: not stated
Withdrawals: stated
Baseline characteristics: comparable
Jadad score: 4

Participants

353 adolescents/adults: 236M 117F Age range: 12‐75 years Inclusion criteria: 12 years of age or older FEV1 45‐75 (% predicted) 15% or greater reversibility in FEV1 after inhaled beta2 agonist Significant asthma symptoms during run‐in period: e.g. daily asthma symptoms with > 8 puffs beta2 agonist/day or 2‐ 4 weekly nighttime awakenings due to asthma Exclusion criteria: History of life‐threatening asthma Smokers of 10 pack years or greater Previous use of inhaled, oral, injectable or intra‐nasal corticosteroids Pregnancy

Interventions

1. FP 25 mcg 2 puffs 2xdaily (100 mcg/d)

2. FP 50 mcg 2 puffs 2xdaily (200 mcg/d)

Delivery device: MDI

Outcomes

Probability of remaining in study

All outcomes expressed as change compared to baseline:

FEV1
Morning PEFR
Daily use of beta2 agonist
Daily asthma symptom score
Night‐time awakenings per week

'Effective or very effective' Physician rated global assessment of efficacy (No. of patients)

Oropharyngeal side effects

Notes

No reply from author to clarify details of randomisation method

For continuous outcomes change scores from baseline to endpoint (i.e. point of withdrawal) were reported

A priori criteria for withdrawal due to lack of efficacy were established based on diurnal variability in PEFR, night‐time awakenings, rescue beta2 agonist use and FEV1

Placebo treatment arm also included: results not considered in this review
Study also included an oral theophylline treatment arm: results not considered in this review

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Unclear risk

Described as randomised; other information not available

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

Information not available

Blinding?
All outcomes

Low risk

Identical inhaler devices

Gershman 2000

Methods

Randomised, double‐blind, single dummy, parallel group study. Participants randomised according to their entry in to the treatment phase. 2 participants withdrew from the low dose FP. ITT population

Jadad score: 3

Participants

N = 24 (FP1000mcg group: 12; FP100mcg group: N = 12. FP1000: 3F/9M; FP100: 12M). 23/24 atopic asthma. Mean FEV1 (% pred): FP1000 group: 69; FP100 group: 66; FEF25‐75%: FP1000 group: 1.87 (SEM 0.17); FP100 group: 2.18 (SEM 0.22); PC20: FP1000 group: 0.95 (0.1 to 11.2); FP 100 group: 0.63 (0.3 to 2.5); ECP ng/mL: FP 1000 group: 84 (24 to 165); FP 100 group: 154 (24 to 282)

Interventions

FP100mcg daily versus FP1000mcg daily. Duration: 6 weeks. Inhaler device: MDI+spacer

Outcomes

Lung function (FEV1; PEF; FEF); PC20; ECP; Symptoms

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Unclear risk

Described as randomised; other information not available

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

Information not available

Blinding?
All outcomes

Low risk

Identical inhaler devices

Giannini 2003

Methods

Randomised, double‐blind parallel group study. Method of randomisation: Not reported. Withdrawals: No withdrawals occurred.

Jadad score: 3

Participants

N=27. Mean age: 38.67 (SD 16.97). M/F: 15/12; history of atopy: 18/6; FEV1: 3.23 (SD 0.91); FEV1 % predicted (median (range)): 96 (76‐122); PD20: 0.220

Inclusion criteria: diurnal/nocturnal symptoms=0, low PEF variability [maximal amplitude(‐MA) <10%).

Exclusion criteria: no use of ß‐agonists throughout run‐in

Interventions

FP100 versus FP250 versus PLA. Inhaler device: unclear

Outcomes

FEV1; PD20; Sputum eosinophils; max amplitude; PEF; Symptoms; Rescue medication use

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Unclear risk

Described as randomised; other information not available

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

Information not available

Blinding?
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Information not available

Hofstra 2000

Methods

Randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, 3‐arm parallel group trial. Methods of randomisation: not reported. ITT population
Jadad score: 2

Participants

N = 37 (PLA: 12; FP100: 11; FP250: 14); Age: PLA: 9.8 (SD 2.4); FP100: 9.9 (SD 1.6); FP250: 11.1 (SD 2.4); FEV1 (% predicted): PLA: 92.1 (SD 12.5); FP100: 96.6 (SD 6.9); FP250: 93.2 (SD 13.3)
Exclusion criteria:
ICS use in last 4 months

Interventions

Inhaled FP100 BID (200mcg/d)versus inhaled FP250 BID (500mcg/d) versus placebo, via MDI with a volumatic spacer

Duration: 6 weeks (FP100 versus FP250 versus PLA); subsequent 12 weeks, PLA group re‐allocated at random to FP100 or FP250 group. Data extracted up until 6 weeks (subsequent time points have data from participants who had been treated with PLA for preceding 6 weeks)

Outcomes

FEV1 (% predicted); EIB; PD20

Notes

Patients were randomised to receive FP or placebo and treated for 6 weeks. After 6 weeks patients receiving placebo were re‐randomised to either dose of FP for a further 18 weeks. Placebo treatment arm also included: results not considered in this review.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Unclear risk

Described as randomised; other information not available

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

Information not available

Blinding?
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Information not available

Ind 2003

Methods

Setting: multicentre study Canada, Denmark, Iceland, Italy, UK
Length of intervention period: 24 weeks
Randomisation: yes, not reported
Allocation concealment: unclear
Design: parallel group
Masking: double blind
Excluded: not stated
Withdrawals: stated
Baseline characteristics: comparable
Jadad score: 3

Participants

496 adults
266 F; 230M
Age range: 16‐75 years
Inclusion criteria:
16‐75 years
Requirement for high dose BDP
Poor control
Two exacerbations in past year requiring a change of therapy
Symptomatic (assessed during run‐in)

Interventions

i) FSC (not covered in this review) ii) FP 500mcg/d iii) FP 1000mcg/d Inhaler device: MDI

Outcomes

Withdrawals (n) am PEF pm PEF Exacerbations Symptoms Relief medication usage Clinic FEV1 Clinic FVC Physician assessment of effectiveness (n) Subjects assessment of effectiveness (n) Adverse events (n)

Notes

Unpublished trial

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Low risk

See Appendix 2

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

See Appendix 2

Blinding?
All outcomes

Low risk

Identical inhaler devices used

Katz 1998

Methods

Setting: multicentre study, Europe, Middle East and Asia, hospital outpatient clinics
Length of intervention period: 12 weeks
Randomisation: yes, method not stated
Allocation concealment: unclear
Design: parallel group
Masking: double blind
Excluded: not stated
Withdrawals: stated
Baseline characteristics: comparable
Jadad score: 3

Participants

263 children: 166M 97F Age range: 4‐11 years Inclusion criteria: Diagnosis of asthma (not otherwise defined) Recurrent episodes of bronchoconstriction and cough Able to use delivery device and peak flow meter satisfactorily PEFR 75 (% predicted)or less, or PEFR 75‐90 (% predicted) with asthma symptoms during run‐in period Exclusion criteria: Treatment with inhaled corticosteroids within last 3 months Oral steroids in last month Continuous treatment with oral steroids over 2 months or more in past Hospital admission due to asthma in last 3 months

Interventions

1. FP 50 mcg 2 x daily (100 mcg/d)

2. FP 100 mcg 2 x daily (200 mcg/d)

Delivery device: Diskhaler DPI

Outcomes

Outcomes expressed as change compared to baseline: FEV1 FVC FEF 25‐75 Morning PEFR Evening PEFR Daily asthma symptom score Night‐time wakening score Daily use of beta2 agonists Probability of remaining in study

Notes

Reply from author but unable to clarify details of randomisation method

For continuous outcomes change scores from baseline to endpoint (i.e. point of withdrawal) were reported

A priori criteria for withdrawal due to lack of efficacy were established based on FEV1, PEFR, sleep disturbance or rescue beta2 agonist use

Placebo treatment arm also included: results not considered in this review

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Low risk

See Appendix 2

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

See Appendix 2

Blinding?
All outcomes

Low risk

Identical inhaler devices used

Kemp 2004

Methods

Setting: multicentre study, USA
Length of intervention period: 2 years
Randomisation: yes (randomisation code generated off‐site)
Allocation concealment: adequate
Design: parallel group
Masking: double blind (identical)
Excluded: yes
Withdrawals: stated

Jadad score: 5

Participants

190 adults and adolescents screened, 160 randomised (three arm study; PLA: N = 54; FP400: N = 55; FP1000: 51), Age range: 18‐50; Mean baseline FEV1 (% predicted): PLA: 83; FP100: 82; FP500: 85

Inclusion criteria: 18‐50 years (F: 18‐40); mild asthma (6 months); FEV1: 50‐100% predicted

Exclusion criteria: Significant co‐morbidity of bone; alterations in body weight; reversal of nocturnal sleeping hours; substance abuse

Interventions

FP200 BID (400) versus FP1000 BID (1000) versus PLA. Inhaler device: MDI

Outcomes

Bome mineral density; withdrawals; adverse events

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Low risk

See Appendix 2

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

Randomisation code generated off‐site

Blinding?
All outcomes

Low risk

Idenitcal inhaler devices

Lawrence 1997

Methods

Setting: multicentre study USA, hospital outpatient clinics
Length of intervention period: 6 weeks
Randomisation: yes, method not stated
Allocation concealment: unclear
Design: parallel group
Masking: double blind, double dummy
Excluded: not stated
Withdrawals: stated
Baseline characteristics: comparable
Jadad score: 4

Participants

261 adults Age range: 18‐71 years Inclusion criteria: Diagnosis of asthma (ATS criteria 1987) Treatment with ICS for 3 months or longer Treatment with BDP 336 mcg/d or TA 800 mcg/d at stable dose for 2 weeks FEV1 50‐80 (% predicted) 15% or greater reversibility in FEV1 after inhaled beta2 agonist Exclusion criteria: Systemic, intra‐nasal or opthalmic corticosteroids in last 2 months Oral corticosteroids for > 2 months in last 6 months Pregnancy

Interventions

1. FP100 mcg 2xdaily (200 mcg/d)

2. FP 500 mcg 2xdaily (1000 mcg/d)

Delivery device: Diskhaler DPI

Outcomes

Probability of remaining in study Outcomes expressed as change compared to baseline: FEV1 Morning PEFR Daily asthma symptom score Daily use of beta2 agonist Morning plasma cortisol Oro‐pharyngeal side effects

Notes

No reply from author to clarify details of randomisation method

Results for continuous outcomes expressed as change to endpoint (point of withdrawal)

A priori criteria for withdrawal due to lack of efficacy were established based on FEV1, morning PEFR, night‐time awakenings or clinical exacerbation requiring emergency hospital treatment

Placebo treatment arm also included: results not considered in this review

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Unclear risk

Described as randomised; no other information available

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

Information not available

Blinding?
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Information not available

Li 1999

Methods

Randomised, double‐blind, triple dummy, placebo‐controlled trial. Methods of randomisation not reported. Withdrawals: Placebo: 0; FP88: 1; FP220: 1. Non‐ITT.

Jadad score: 4

Participants

N = 128 (N for treatments considered by this review: 63; Placebo: 17; FP88: 22; FP220: 24). M/F ratio (%): PLA: 82/18; FP88: 68/32; FP220: 58/42; Mean age (range): PLA: 31 (19‐41); FP88: 30 (19‐42); FP220: 33 (18‐53); Ethnic origin (%) (White/Other): PLA: 94/6; FP88: 95/5; FP220: 88/13; FEV1 % Predicted: PLA: 89.1; FP88: 82.5; FP220: 88.2; Concurrent medication: Salmeterol: PLA: 0; FP88: 0; FP220: 1; Theophylline: PLA: 2; FP88: 0; FP220: 3; Cromolyn: PLA: 0; FP88: 1; FP220: 1; Nedocromil: PLA: 0; FP88: 0; FP220: 1

Inclusion criteria: Non‐smokers; asthma according to ATS criteria; duration of disease >6 months; FEV1 >/=50% predicted

Exclusion criteria: Pregnancy/lactation; use of methotrexate/gold salts; use of inhaled cromolyn/nedocromil; use of oral, intranasal, inhaled or injectable steroids <4 weeks of study commencement; use of >/= 140mg prednisone or equivalent dosage in past year; significant concomitant illness; immunotherapy requiring change in dosage regimen within 12 weeks; reversal of nocturnal sleeping hours; concurrent use of over‐the‐counter medication that might affect course of asthma or interact with sympathomimetic amines or confound cortisol assay

Interventions

FP88 versus FP220 versus Placebo. Inhaler device: pMDI + spacer. Duration: 28 days.

Outcomes

HPA axis function; plasma concentration; area under the curve; adverse events

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Unclear risk

Described as randomised; other information not available

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

Information not available

Blinding?
All outcomes

Low risk

Identical inhaler devices

Lumry 2006

Methods

Randomised, double‐blind, parallel group study. Method of randomisation: not reported; blinding: not reported. Withdrawals ‐ Last observation carried forward. Missing: PLA: 2; FP88 BID: 3; FP220 BID: 1; FP440 BID: 2

Jadad score: 3

Participants

N=415 (PLA: 104; FP172: 103; FP440: 106; FP880: 102); Mean FEV1 % predicted: PLA: 65.6; FP172: 65.3; FP440: 65.5; FP880: 66.2; mean am PEF (l/min): PLA: 346; FP172: 334; FP440: 329; FP880: 333.1

Inclusion criteria: >/=12 years; asthma for >6 months requiring tx with ICS for >/=3 months; FEV1: 45‐80% predicted; >/=12% reversibility

Exclusion criteria: not reported

Interventions

HFA FP88 BID (172 mcg/d) versus HFA FP220 BID (440) versus HFA FP440 BID (880). Study duration: 12 weeks. Inhaler device: MDI

Outcomes

am PEF; FEV1 (% predicted)

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Low risk

See Appendix 2

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

See Appendix 2

Blinding?
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Identical inhaler devices used

Meijer 1999

Methods

Randomised, double‐blind, double‐dummy parallel group trial. Method of randomisation: computerised minimisation method. Participants stratified according to age, previous dose of ICS, FEV % pred, reversibility to 200mcg sal, smoking status, serum IgE and PC20 methacholine. ITT population (all participants who contributed one reading). ICS tapered down at least 3 weeks prior to randomisation. If symptoms deteriorated during tapering phase thy were asked to present earlier for randomisation.

Jadad score: 4

Participants

N = 120 (Prednisolone: 40; FP2000: 40; FP500: 40; ); Median age: Prednisolone: 28 (18‐53); FP2000: 27 (18‐48); FP500: 27 (18‐56); M/F: Prednisolone: 14/26; FP2000: 14/26; FP500: 13/27; Smokers (%) (Current:Ex‐smoker:Non‐smoker): Prednisolone: 28:23:49; FP2000: 31:15:54; FP500: 28:23:49; FEV1 (% predicted): Prednisolone: 80 (65 to 91); FP2000: 79 (67 to 91); FP500: 81 (70 to 96); Reversibility (% pred): Prednisolone: 12 (9.2 to 17.8); FP2000: 11.4 (9 to 17.2); FP500: 12.3 (9.2 to 14.4); Log2 PC20 methacholine (mg/ml): Prednisolone: ‐0.86 (0.36); FP2000: ‐0.83 (0.37); FP500: ‐0.83 (0.36); Log2 PC20 AMP (mg/ml): Prednisolone: 1.89 (0.56); FP2000: 3.02 (0.54); FP500: 2.59 (0.67); IgE (IU/ml): Prednisolone: 251 (157 to 615); FP2000: 251 (85 to 550); FP500: 181 (97 to 631); Blood eosinophils (%): Prednisolone: 5.8 (3.6 to 8.0); FP2000: 5.0 (4.0 to 6.8); FP500: 5.1 (2.8 to 7.9); Sputum eosinophils (%): Prednisolone: 5.5 (2.0 to 14.7); FP2000: 5.0 (1.0 to 8.0); FP500: 5.0 (1.67 to 12); Serum ECP (mcg/l): Prednisolone: 19.5 (10.4 to 26.8); FP2000: 13.3 (9.9 to 22); FP500: 17.1 (9.3 to 24.9); Serum ECP Prednisolone (mcg/l): 78.4 (28 to 292); FP2000: 73.6 (33 to 250); FP500: 95.8 (46 to 233); Serum cortisol (nmol/l): Prednisolone: 420 (302 to 563); FP2000: 425 (320 to 725); FP500: 445 (265 to 740).

Inclusion criteria: 18‐56 years; diagnosis of asthma; concentration of methacholine causing 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20) of 8mg/ml; 1 +ve skin prick test to 17 most common aeroallergens; reversibility to ß2 agonist (>/= 9% of predicted FEV1); ability to expectorate after hypertonic saline.

Exclusion criteria: Participants who experienced exacerbation during run‐in phase which required course of oral steroids.

Interventions

Inhaled FP 500mcg versus Inhaled FP 2000mcg versus oral prednisolone. Duration: 2 weeks. Inhaler device: DPI.

Outcomes

FEV (% predicted); PC20 methacholine (DC); PC20 AMP (DC); PEF (L/min); Daytime symptoms; rescue medication (puffs/day); Sputum eosinophils (%); Serum ECP (mcg/l); Sputum ECP (mcg/l); Serum cortisol

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Low risk

Computerised minimisation method. Participants stratified according to age, previous dose of ICS, FEV % predicted, reversibility to 200mcg SABA, smoking status, serum IgE and PC20 methacholine

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

Information not available

Blinding?
All outcomes

Low risk

Double dummy design

Nathan 2000

Methods

Randomised, double‐blind, placebo controlled multi‐centre trial. Method of randomisation not reported. Participants randomised according to baseline therapy: ICS or ß‐2. Withdrawals: PLA: 43; FP100: 34; FP200: 28; FP500: 20.

Jadad score: 3

Participants

N = 330. (PLA: 84; FP100mcg: 79; FP200mcg: 81; FP500mcg: 86); Gender (% M:F): PLA: 56:44; FP100: 65:35; FP200: 56:44; FP500: 55:45; Age range: 12‐75; Mean age: PLA: 38; FP100: 34; FP200: 38; FP500: 37; FEV1 L: PLA: 2.22 (SEM 0.06); FP100: 2.40 (0.07); FP200: 2.21 (SEM 0.07); FP500: 2.26 (SEM 0.05); FEV1 % predicted: PLA: 62.6 (SEM 1.07); FP100: 64.3 (SEM 0.89); FP200: 63.3 (SEM 1.03); FP500: 63.7 (SEM 0.96); am PEF (L/min): PLA: 394 (SEM 10); FP100: 397 (SEM 10); FP200: 395 (SEM 10); FP500: 379 (SEM 10); pm PEF (L/min): PLA: 412 (SEM 10); FP100: 420 (SEM 10); FP200: 414 (SEM 10); FP500: 404 (SEM 10); Asthma symptom scores: PLA: 1.10 (SEM 0.07); FP100: 1.18 (SEM 0.06); FP200: 1.03 (SEM 0.07); FP500: 1.08 (SEM 0.07); Albuterol use (puffs/d): PLA: 3.05 (SEM 0.26); FP100: 3.43 (SEM 0.26); FP200: 2.62 (SEM 0.24); FP500: 3.18 (SEM 0.26); Nighttime awakenings, No. (%): PLA: 0.09 (SEM 0.02); FP100: 0.08 (SEM 0.02); FP200: 0.12 (SEM 0.02); FP500: 0.10 (SEM 0.02) .

Interventions

Inhaled FP100mcg QD versus FP200mcg QD versus FP500mcg QD versus placebo. Diskus inhaler. Duration: 12 weeks (plus open label extension)

Outcomes

Lung function (FEV1; am PEF; pm PEF); asthma symptoms; albuterol use; nighttime awakenings; withdrawals; safety; HPA axis function

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Low risk

See Appendix 2

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

See Appendix 2

Blinding?
All outcomes

Low risk

Identical inhaler devices

Nelson 1999

Methods

Setting: multicentre study USA, hospital outpatient clinics
Length of intervention period: 16 weeks
Randomisation: yes, method not stated
Allocation concealment: unclear
Design: parallel group
Masking: double blind
Excluded: not stated
Withdrawals: stated
Baseline characteristics: comparable
Jadad score: 3

Participants

111 adults: 44M 67F Age range: 12‐77 years Inclusion criteria: 12 years of age or older Diagnosis of asthma (ATS criteria 1987) Dependent on oral corticosteroids for asthma control for 6 months or longer Requiring 5‐40 mg/day oral prednisolone FEV1 40‐80 (% predicted) 15% or greater reversibility in FEV1 after inhaled beta2 agonist Exclusion criteria: Life‐threatening asthma or other severe concurrent disease Use of intra‐nasal, injectable, topical corticosteroids Methotrexate, cyclosporin, azathioprine, troleandomycin within last 3 months

Interventions

1. FP 500 mcg 2xdaily (1000 mcg/d)

2. FP 1000 mcg 2xdaily (2000 mcg/d)

Delivery device: Accuhaler DPI

Outcomes

100% reduction in daily dose oral prednisolone (No. of patients) 1‐49% reduction in daily dose oral prednisolone (No. of patients) 0% reduction or increase in daily dose oral prednisolone (No. of patients) Outcomes reported as a change compared to baseline: Daily dose oral prednisolone FEV1 Morning PEFR Evening PEFR Daily asthma symptom score Daily beta2 agonist use Night‐time awakenings Health status: asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Plasma cortisol < 5mcg/L (No. of patients) Peak plasma cortisol < 18 mcg/dL during 6 hour iv infusion with 250 mcg co‐syntropin (No. of patients) Change in plasma cortisol < 7 mcg/dL following co‐syntropin infusion (No. of patients) Change in morning plasma cortisol compared to baseline

Notes

No reply from author to clarify details of randomisation method

Usual ICS discontinued at randomisation

A priori criteria for prednisolone dose reduction based on FEV1 (% predicted), PEFR (% predicted), number of night‐time awakenings, beta‐2 agonist use compared to run in period values

Patients were withdrawn from the study if they experienced asthma exacerbation requiring hospital admission, or 3 bursts of oral prednisolone due to exacerbation

Placebo treatment arm also included: results not considered in this review

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Low risk

See Appendix 2

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

See Appendix 2

Blinding?
All outcomes

Low risk

Identical inhaler devices

Nieto 2001

Methods

Randomised controlled trial. Method of randomisation not reported; blinding not reported. Withdrawals not reported.

Jadad score: 1

Participants

N=18 (distribution between groups unclear). M/F: 9/9; mean age: 30 (SD 8); PC20: 1.14 (1.38).

Inclusion criteria: not reported.

Exclusion criteria: not reported.

Interventions

FP100 BID (200) versus FP250 BID (500). Inhaler device: unclear

Outcomes

PC20; exhaled nitric oxide

Notes

Unpublised conference abstract

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Unclear risk

Described as randomised; other information not available

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

Information not available

Blinding?
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Information not available

Noonan 1995

Methods

Setting: multicentre study USA, hospital outpatient clinics
Length of intervention period: 16 weeks
Randomisation: yes, method not stated
Allocation concealment: unclear
Design: parallel group
Masking: double blind
Excluded: stated
Withdrawals:
Baseline characteristics: comparable
Jadad score: 4

Participants

96 adults: 46M 50F Mean age: 50‐52 years Inclusion criteria: 12 years of age or older Diagnosis of asthma (ATS criteria 1987) Dependent on oral corticosteroids for asthma control for 6 months or longer FEV1 40‐80 (% predicted) Documented evidence of previous attempts to reduce oral steroid dose Exclusion criteria: Use of methotrexate, gold salts or troleandomycin in last 3 months Nasal corticosteroid use 10 pack year history of smoking or greater Pregnancy or lactation

Interventions

1. FP 750 mcg 2xdaily (1500 mcg/d)

2. FP 1000 mcg 2xdaily (2000 mcg/d)

Delivery device: MDI

Outcomes

100% reduction in daily oral steroid use (% patients) 1‐49% reduction in daily oral steroid use (% patients) 0% or increase in daily oral steroid use (% patients) Outcomes expressed as change compared to baseline: Daily oral FEV1 Morning PEFR Evening PEFR Daily use of beta2 agonists Daily asthma symptom score Quailty of life: Medical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF‐36)

Notes

No reply from author to clarify details of randomisation method

Usual ICS discontinued at randomisation

Daily dose oral prednisolone reduced according to pre‐defined criteria

An uncontrolled one year open label study was undertaken following the randomised 16 week trial, when all patients received FP 2000 mcg/d. Results not considered in this review

Placebo treatment arm also included: results not considered in this review

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Unclear risk

Described as randomised; other information not available

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

Information not available

Blinding?
All outcomes

Low risk

Identical inhaler devices

Noonan 1998

Methods

Setting: multicentre study USA, hospital outpatient clinic
Length of intervention period: 8 weeks
Randomisation: yes, method not stated
Allocation concealment: unclear
Design: parallel group
Masking: double blind
Excluded: not stated
Withdrawals: stated
Baseline characteristics: comparable
Jadad score: 3

Participants

138 adults: 84M 54F Age range: 12‐59 years Inclusion criteria: 12 years of age or older Diagnosis of asthma (ATS criteria 1987) 6 months or longer FEV1 60 (% predicted) or greater 15% or greater reversibility in FEV1 after inhaled beta2 agonist Methacholine BHR (PD20 FEV1) < 18 mg Asthma stability during run in period based on a priori defined criteria related to PEFR, medication requirement and symptoms Exclusion criteria: Recent hospitalisation due to asthma exacerbation Treatment with corticosteroids, theophylline, sodium cromoglycate, nedocromil Pregnancy

Interventions

1. FP 50 mcg 2xdaily (100 mcg/d)

2. FP 100 mcg 2xdaily (200 mcg/d)

Delivery device: MDI

Outcomes

Outcomes expressed as change compared to baseline: FEV1 Morning PEFR Evening PEFR Methacholine BHR (log e PD20 FEV1) Daily asthma symptom score Daily use of beta2 agonist Night‐time awakenings Probability of remaining in study Oro‐pharyngeal side effects

Notes

No reply from author to clarify details of randomisation method

For continuous outcomes change scores from baseline to endpoint (i.e. point of withdrawal) were reported

A priori criteria for withdrawal due to lack of efficacy were established based on FEV1, morning PEFR, night‐time awakenings or clinical exacerbation requiring emergency hospital treatment

MDI's used for all interventions. Formulations of FP with 1% lecithin and 10% lecithin used. Only data for 1% formulation included in meta‐analysis

Placebo treatment arm also included: results not considered in this review

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Unclear risk

Described as randomised; other information not available

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

Information not available

Blinding?
All outcomes

Low risk

Identical inhaler devices

O'Sullivan 2002

Methods

Randomised, double‐blind, parallel group trial. Method of randomisation not reported; blinding not reported. Withdrawals: N = 1. nonITT population

Jadad score: 3

Participants

N=36. Mean age: FP100: 32 (SEM 2.8); FP500: 32 (SEM 2.1); FP2000: 34 (SEM 2.8); FEV1% predicted: FP100: 81 (SEM 4.2); FP500: 86 (SEM 2.7); FP2000: 79 (SEM 3.3); Mean PC20: FP100: 1.11 (0.41); FP500: 0.55 (SEM 0.18); FP2000: 0.86 (SEM 0.51).

Inclusion criteria: Atopic asthma as determined by skin prick test; fev1 >/=60% predicted; change in FEV1 >/=12% post SABA; PC20 fall of 4mg/mL; all participants were steroid naive; SABA prn

Exclusion criteria: RTI in previous 6 months; steroid (I/O) use in 6 weeks prior to enrolment

Interventions

FP100 versus FP500 versus FP2000. Study duration: 2 weeks. 2 week run‐in period with placebo inhalers. Inhaler device: MDI

Outcomes

FEV1; FEF; FEV1/FVC; PEF L/min; Symptoms; bronchial biopsy; PC20; adverse events

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Unclear risk

Described as randomised; other information not available

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

Information not available

Blinding?
All outcomes

Low risk

Identical inhaler devices

Pauwels 2002

Methods

Randomised, double‐blind, double‐dummy crossover study. Method of randomisation: not reported; blinding: not reported.

Jadad score: 2

Participants

N=26, Other details not reported

Interventions

Ciclesonide (400mcg QID; 800mcg QID; 800mcg QID), FP500 BID & FP1000 BID or PLA. Study duration: 6 x 1 week treatment period. Inhaler device: unclear

Outcomes

% Cortisol suppression; PC20

Notes

Unpublished conference abstract

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Unclear risk

Described as randomised; other information not available

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

Information not available

Blinding?
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Information not available

Pearlman 1997

Methods

Setting: multicentre study USA, hospital outpatient clinic
Length of intervention period: 12 weeks
Randomisation: yes, method not stated
Allocation concealment: unclear
Design: parallel group
Masking: double blind
Excluded: not stated
Withdrawals: stated
Baseline characteristics: comparable
Jadad score: 3

Participants

342 subjects randomised Age range: 12‐72 years Inclusion criteria: Diagnosis of asthma (ATS criteria 1987) Required maintenance inhaled corticosteroids for at least 3 months FEV! 50‐80 (%predicted) 15% or greater reversibility in FEV1 after inhaled beta2 agonist During last 7 days of run‐in period: No more than 12 puffs per day of albuterol No more than 4 morning PEFR 20% less than previous evenings No more than 2 nights wakening due to asthma requiring inhaled albuterol adequate compliance with study medication Exclusion criteria: Previous use of gold or methotrexate for control of asthma Inhaled cromoglycate or oral steroids in the last 4 weeks Significant co‐existent illness Pregnancy or lactation

Interventions

1. FP 50 mcg 1 actuation 2xdaily (100 mcg/d)

2. FP 100mcg 1 actuation 2xdaily (200 mcg/d)

3. FP 250 mcg 1 actuation 2xdaily (500 mcg/d)

Delivery device: Diskhaler DPI

Outcomes

Outcomes expressed as change compared to baseline: FEV1 Morning PEFR Evening PEFR Daily asthma symptom score Night‐time awakenings Daily use of beta2 agonist Medical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF‐36A) Living with Asthma Questionnaire (LWA) Validated sleep scale Probability of remaining in study Physician global assessment of efficacy Serum cortisol Oro‐pharyngeal side effects

Notes

No reply from author to clarify details of randomisation method

For continuous outcomes change scores from baseline to endpoint (i.e. point of withdrawal) were reported

A priori criteria for withdrawal due to lack of efficacy were established based on FEV1, morning PEFR, night‐time awakenings or clinical exacerbation requiring emergency hospital treatment

Placebo treatment arm also included: results not considered in this review

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Unclear risk

Described as randomised; other information not available

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

Information not available

Blinding?
All outcomes

Low risk

Identical inhaler devices used

Pearlman 1999

Methods

Randomised, double‐blind, double‐dummy, parallel group multi‐centre trial. Method of randomisation not reported. ITT population. Withdrawals: PLA 1; SAL42mcg: 2; FP88mcg: 1; FP220mcg: 1; SL42mcg/FP88mcg: 2; SAL42mcg/FP220mcg: 21

Jadad score: 3

Participants

N = 136 (PLA: 23; FP88: 23; FP220: 23; SAL: 21; SAL/FP88: 25; SAL/FP220: 21).Mean age (range): PLA: 35 (12‐62); SAL: 29 (15‐57); FP88: 27 (13‐50); FP220: 32 (14‐61); SAL/FP88: 33 (14‐60); SAL/FP220: 26 (13‐52); Gender (M:F %): PLA: 43:57; SAL42: 67:33; FP88: 74:26; FP220: 57:43; SAL/FP88: 40:60; SAL/FP220: 67:33; Mean FEV1 (% predicted): PLA: 68; SAL: 70; FP88: 69; FP220: 65; SAL/FP88: 67; SAL/FP220: 69; Reversibility: PLA: 32; SAL: 27; FP88:

Inclusion criteria: >/=12 years of age; ATS defined asthma (at least 6 months), requiring medical treatment; FEV1 between 50‐80% predicted; >/=15% increase in FEV1 post‐SABA; treatment with prn SABA; female participants had ‐ve pregnancy tests and either surgically sterile, postmenopausal at 1 year or using acceptable birth control for 1 month prior to participation

Exclusion criteria: History of life‐threatening asthma; hypersensitivity reaction to beta‐agonists/corticosteroids; smoking within previous year/history >10 pack years; use of OCS/ICS or parenteral steroids (except for Flonase); use of steroid therapy in previous month; OCS treatment in previous 6 months; use of OTC medication that may affect the course of asthma; abnormal CXR; clinically significant abnormal 12‐lead ECG; history of concurrent disease (glaucoma, diabetes + hypertension)

Interventions

PLA versus FP88mcg BID versus FP220mcg BID versus SAL42mcg/FP88mcg BID versus SAL42mcg/FP220mcg BID daily. Inhaler device: MDI. Duration: 4 weeks

Outcomes

FEV1; Am PEF; Symptoms; % days without asthma; % nights awakening due to asthma; rescue medication use; adverse effects

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Low risk

See Appendix 2

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

See Appendix 2

Blinding?
All outcomes

Low risk

Identical inhaler devices

Peden 1998

Methods

Setting: multicentre study USA, paediatric outpatient clinic
Length of intervention period: 12 weeks
Randomisation: yes, method not stated
Allocation concealment: unclear
Design: parallel group
Masking: double blind, double dummy
Excluded: not stated
Withdrawals: stated
Baseline characteristics: comparable
Jadad score: 3

Participants

177 children: 112M 65F
Age range: 4‐11 years
Inclusion criteria:
History of chronic asthma (ATS criteria 1987)
Symptoms requiring maintenance therapy for 3 months or more
PEFR 85 (% predicted) or greater
FEV1 50‐85 (% predicted)
15% or greater improvement in FEV1 after inhaled beta2 agonist
Asthma stability during run‐in period, based on a priori beta2 agonist use and morning PEFR
Exclusion criteria:
Life‐threatening asthma
Severe concurrent disease
Systemic steroids in last month
Previous treatment with methotrexate or gold

Interventions

1. FP 50mcg 2xdaily (100 mcg/d) via Accuhaler DPI

2. FP 100mcg 2xdaily (200mcg/d) via Accuhaler DPI

Outcomes

Outcomes expressed as change compared to baseline: FEV1 FEV1 (% predicted) Morning PEFR Morning PEFR (% predicted) Evening PEFR Daily asthma symptom score Daily use of beta2 agonist Night‐time awakening score Morning plasma cortisol Total urinary free cortisol excretion (mcg/24 hours) Probability of remaining in study

Notes

No reply from author to clarify details of randomisation method

For continuous outcomes change scores from baseline to endpoint (i.e. point of withdrawal) were reported

A placebo treatment arm was also included: results not considered in this review

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Low risk

See Appendix 2

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

See Appendix 2

Blinding?
All outcomes

Low risk

Double dummy design

Peden 1998a

Methods

See Peden 1998

Participants

174 children: 100M 74F
See Peden 1998a for inclusion and exclusion criteria

Interventions

1. FP 50 mcg 2xdaily (100 mcg/d) via Diskhaler DPI

2. 100 mcg 2xdaily (200 mcg/d) via Diskhaler DPI

Outcomes

See Peden 1998

Notes

See Peden 1998

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Low risk

See Peden 1998

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

See Peden 1998

Blinding?
All outcomes

Low risk

See Peden 1998

Pinnas 2005

Methods

Setting: multicentre study USA.
Length of intervention period: 12 weeks.
Randomisation: yes, method not stated.
Allocation concealment: unclear.
Design: parallel group
Masking: double blind
Excluded: not stated
Withdrawals: stated
Baseline characteristics: comparable
Jadad score: 3

Participants

397 adults randomised, 312 completed: 212F
Age range: >/=12 years
Inclusion criteria: treatment with SABA only for 6 months previously; am pre‐SABA FEV1 of 45‐80% predicted; >/=12% reversibility.

No run‐in period described.

Interventions

FP:
1. 88mcg 2 x daily

2. 110mcg 2 x daily

2. 220mcg 2 x daily

3. Placebo

Inhaler device: MDI

Outcomes

Change in FEV1; am PEF; rescue medication usage; symptoms; quality of life; adverse events

Notes

Conference abstract

Sourced from www.clinicalstudyresults.org

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Low risk

See Appendix 2

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

See Appendix 2

Blinding?
All outcomes

Low risk

Identical inhaler devices

Raphael 1999

Methods

Setting: multicentre study USA, primary care and hospital outpatient clinics Design: parallel group Length of intervention period: 12 weeks Randomisation: yes, computer generated sequence Allocation concealment: yes (central coding by pharmaceutical company sponsors) Masking: double blind Excluded: not stated Withdrawals: stated Baseline characteristics: comparable Jadad score: 5

Participants

399 adolescents and adults: 167M 232F Age range: 12‐83 years Inclusion criteria: 12 years of age or older with established diagnosis of asthma (no further details) At end of run‐in period: FEV1 of 45‐65 (% predicted), or if FEV1 65‐80 (% predicted) additional evidence of sub‐optimal control (> 8 puffs rescue beta2 agonist/week, diurnal PEFR variability > 20%, any night‐time wakening due to asthma symptoms requiring beta2 agonist) 12% or greater increase in FEV1 after inhaled beta2 agonist Regular treatment with BDP or TA 8‐12 puffs/day for one month or longer Exclusion criteria: Use of systemic steroids, leukotriene modifiers, sodium cromoglycate or nedocromil within last month Smokers Asthma exacerbation during run‐in period Baseline asthma control: Reduced FEV1 of 45‐65 (% predicted) or significant symptoms (see above)

Interventions

1. FP 44 mcg 2 puffs 2xdaily (176 mcg/d)

2. FP 110 mcg 2 puffs 2xdaily (440 mcg/d)

Delivery device: MDI

Outcomes

Change in FEV1 compared to baseline Change in FEF25‐75 compared to baseline Change in FVC compared to baseline Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline Change in rescue beta2 agonist use compared to baseline (puffs/day) Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline Change % days with no rescue beta2 agonist use compared to baseline Change in % days with no symptoms compared to baseline Withdrawal due to asthma exacerbation (No. of patients) Oropharyngeal side effects Oropharyngeal Candidiasis

Notes

Study also included two further treatment arms with BDP: results not considered in this review

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Low risk

Computer generated sequence

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

Central coding by pharmaceutical company sponsors

Blinding?
All outcomes

Low risk

Identical inhaler devices

SAM40012

Methods

Setting: multicentre study Europe and Israel
Design: parallel group
Length of intervention period: 24 weeks
Randomisation: yes
Allocation concealment:
not reported
Masking: double blind, double dummy
Excluded: not stated
Withdrawals: stated
Baseline characteristics: comparable
Jadad score: 3

Participants

367 children (ITT population: 355); 245M 110F
Age range: 4‐11 years
Inclusion criteria: 4‐11 years of age; participants symptomatic despite moderate dose of ICS for at least 4 weeks; symptom score during run‐in >/=2 on at least 3 of last 7 days; mean am PEF during run‐in of >50 to <85% of post SABA at randomisation

Interventions

1. FP100 BD (200mcg/d)

2. FP200 BD (400mcg/d)

Inhaler device: DPI

Outcomes

% symptom free days and nights; use of reliever medication; am PEF (L/min); pm PEF (L/min); Clinic PEF; exacerbations; adverse events

Notes

Unpublished study ‐ data retrieved and extracted from study detailed online

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Low risk

See Appendix 2

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

See Appendix 2

Blinding?
All outcomes

Low risk

Identical inhaler devices

Sheffer 1996

Methods

Setting: multicentre study USA, hospital outpatient clinics
Length of intervention period: 12 weeks
Randomisation: yes, computer generated sequence
Allocation concealment: yes
Design: parallel group
Masking: double blind
Excluded: not stated
Withdrawals: stated
Baseline characteristics: comparable
Jadad score: 5

Participants

307 patients: 185M 122F
Age range: 12‐72 years
Inclusion criteria:
Diagnosis of asthma requiring at least 3 months of regular therapy
FEV1 45‐75 (% predicted)
15% or greater reversibility in FEV1 after inhaled beta2 agonist
Exclusion criteria:
More than 1 month's use of oral steroids in the past
Any oral, topical or inhaled steroid or cromoglycate in last month
Previous history of life threatening asthma
Pregnancy or lactation

Interventions

1. FP 25 mcg 1 puff 2xdaily (50 mcg/d)

2. FP 50 mcg 1 puff 2xdaily (100 mcg/d)

3. FP 50 mcg 2 puffs 2xdaily (200 mcg/d)

Delivery device: MDI

Outcomes

Outcomes expressed as change compared to baseline: FEV1; Morning PEFR; Evening PEFR; Night‐time awakenings; Daily wheeze score; Daily cough score; Daily breathlessness score; Daily use of beta2 agonists; Probability of remaining in study

Notes

Randomisation details confirmed by author For continuous outcomes change scores from baseline to endpoint (i.e. point of withdrawal) were reported A priori criteria for withdrawal due to lack of efficacy were established based on FEV1, morning and evening PEFR, diurnal variability in PEFR, night‐time awakenings or clinical exacerbation requiring emergency hospital treatment

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Low risk

Computer generated sequence

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

Off site by third party

Blinding?
All outcomes

Low risk

Identical inhaler devices

Sorkness 1999

Methods

Randomised, double‐blind, triple dummy, placebo controlled, parallel group study. Method of randomisation: computer‐generated randomisation. Blinding: matching inhalers. Withdrawals: Placebo: 0; FP100: 1; FP500: 1. ITT population.

Jadad score: 5

Participants

N = 168 (N for treatment groups considered by the review: Placebo: 30; FP100: 27; FP500: 30); Mean age (SE): PLA: 27.9 (1.6); FP100: 27.7 (1.7); FP500: 28.2 (1.6); Gender (M/F): PLA: 26/4; FP100: 26/1; FP500: 24/6; Race (White/other %): PLA: 67/33; FP100: 81/19; FP500: 77/23; FEV1 % predicted (SE): PLA: 87 (2.5); FP100: 88 (3.1); FP500: 83 (3.9)

Inclusion criteria: 18‐51 years of age; documented diagnosis of asthma (>/=6 months according to ATS criteria; FEV1 at least 50% predicted

Exclusion criteria: Pregnancy or lactation; corticosteroid/immunosuppressive therapy for 3 months prior to study entry; use of 140mg prednisone or equivalent in any dosage or form in previous year; current/prior use of antiasthma medication other than beta‐agonists, theophylline or cromolyn sodium; historical or current evidence of significant concomitant disease; use of oral contraceptives or other hormonal therapy; current use of prescription or over the counter medication known to interact with corticosteroids or to cause an abnormal response to exogenous glucocorticoids or reversal of normal nocturnal sleeping hours

Interventions

FP200 versus FP1000 versus Placebo. Delivery device: Rotadisk. Duration of study: 4 weeks

Outcomes

AUC; Plasma cortisol; withdrawals; adverse events

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Low risk

Computer‐generated randomisation.

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

Information not available

Blinding?
All outcomes

Low risk

Triple dummy design

Sorkness 1999a

Methods

Randomised, double‐blind, triple dummy, placebo controlled, parallel group study. Method of randomisation: computer‐generated randomisation. Blinding: matching inhalers. Withdrawals: PLA: 1; FP100: 3; FP500: 2. ITT population.

Jadad score: 5

Participants

N = 119 (N for treatment groups considered by the review: PLA: 31; FP200: 29; FP500: 30); Mean age (SE): PLA: 32.1 (1.7); FP200: 31.4 (1.8); FP500: 33 (1.6); Gender (M/F): PLA: 25/6; FP200: 26/3; FP500: 26/4; Race (White/other %): PLA: 94/6; FP200: 93/7; FP500: 90/10; FEV1 % predicted (SE): PLA: 87 (2.7); FP200: 86 (2.7); FP500: 88 (3)

Inclusion criteria: 18‐51 years of age; documented diagnosis of asthma (>/=6 months according to ATS criteria; FEV1 at least 50% predicted

Exclusion criteria: Pregnancy or lactation; corticosteroid/immunosuppressive therapy for 3 months prior to study entry; use of 140mg prednisone or equivalent in any dosage or form in previous year; current/prior use of antiasthma medication other than beta‐agonists, theophylline or cromolyn sodium; historical or current evidence of significant concomitant disease; use of oral contraceptives or other hormonal therapy; current use of prescription or over the counter medication known to interact with corticosteroids or to cause an abnormal response to exogenous glucocorticoids or reversal of normal nocturnal sleeping hours

Interventions

FP200 versus FP500 versus Placebo. Delivery device: Rotadisk. Duration of study: 4 weeks

Outcomes

AUC; Plasma cortisol; withdrawals; adverse events

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Low risk

Computer‐generated randomisation.

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

Information not available

Blinding?
All outcomes

Low risk

Identical inhaler devices

Verona 2003

Methods

Randomised, double‐blind parallel group, multi‐centre (Eastern Europe) study. Method of randomisation: computer‐generated randomisation schedule; Blinding ‐ both FP doses administered via Diskus. Withdrawals: FP200: 97/267; FP400: 83/261 ‐ High withdrawal rate as some trial centres did not participate in extension beyond 16 weeks. Ns used based on correspondence with GSK.

Jadad score: 5

Participants

N = 528 (FP200: 267; FP400: 261); Mean age: FP200: 7.8 (SD 2.1); FP400: 7.9 (SD 2); M/F (%): FP200: 72/28; FP400: 72/28; Ethnicity: White/non‐white (%): FP200: >99/<1; FP400: 100/0; mean duration of asthma symptoms (years): FP200: 3.82 (SD 2.2); FP400: 4.05 (SD 2.37); Treatment with BUD/FP/BDP/FLUN (%): FP200: 38/26/25/1; FP400: 41/33/24/<1; mean clinic PEF (% predicted): FP200: 105.1 (21.7); FP400: 101.6 (22.4); mean am PEF (L/min): FP200: 256.9 (SD 75); FP400: 255.4 (SD 72.2); pm PEF (L/min): 265.9 (SD 73.1); FP400: 261.3 (SD 72.2)

Interventions

FP200 versus FP400 via Diskus inhaler. Study duration 52 weeks (2 week run‐in). Participants were allowed to take: oral theophylline, SABAs, DSCG or nedocromil sodium

Outcomes

Asthma exacerbations; clinic PEF; diary PEF (am& pm); symptoms; adverse events

Notes

GSK responded with data on Ns and means/SEMs 060904

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Low risk

See Appendix 2

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

See Appendix 2

Blinding?
All outcomes

Low risk

Identical inhaler devices

Wallin 2003

Methods

Randomised, double‐blind, parallel group trial. Method of randomisation: not reported. Blinding: identical inhalers. Withdrawals: FP400: N = 3; FP1000: N = 3. Unclear population for analysis ‐ assumed non‐ITT

Jadad score: 4

Participants

N = 56 (FP400: 19; FP1000: 19; FP+SAL: 18 ‐ baseline characteristics reported only for FP groups); M/F: FP400: 8/11; FP1000: 9/10; Mean age: FP400: 42 (SEM 12); FP1000: 40 (SEM 15); Asthma duration (months): FP400: 206 (SEM 130); FP1000: 176 (SEM 169); FEV1 L: FP400: 3.0 (SEM 0.9); FP1000: 3.3 (SEM 0.9); FEV1 % predicted: FP400: 91 (SEM 20); FP1000: 92 (SEM 12); PC20 mg/mL: FP400: 1.86 (SEM 2.33); FP1000: 6.22 (SEM 7.54); Reversibility (%): FP400: FEV1: 12 (SEM 11); PEF: 24 (SEM 19); FP1000: FEV1: 12 (SEM 11); PEF: 20 (SEM 17). Run‐in treatment: FP400: BUD: 2; BDP: 2; FP: 5; FP1000: BUD: 14; BDP: 2; FP: 3

Inclusion criteria: Symptomatic asthma during run‐in period in spite of normal medication (frequent asthma symptoms, need for SABAs, >/=20% variation between am and pm PEF); Lung function: 15% increase in FEV1 post‐SABA; PC20 methacholine <4mg/mL

Exclusion criteria: RTI in previous four weeks

Interventions

FP200 BID (400mcg/d) versus FP500 BID (1000 mcg/d) via Diskus inhaler. SABA prn concomitant therapy. Study duration: 12 weeks (2 week run‐in period)

Outcomes

PEF; FEV1; Bronchial lavage; immunohistochemistry

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Low risk

See Appendix 2

Allocation concealment?

Low risk

See Appendix 2

Blinding?
All outcomes

Low risk

Identical inhaler devices

Wasserman 1996

Methods

Setting: multicentre study USA, primary care and hospital outpatient clinics
Length of intervention period: 12 weeks
Randomisation: yes, method not stated
Allocation concealment: unclear
Design: parallel group
Masking: double blind
Excluded: not stated
Withdrawals: stated
Baseline characteristics: comparable
Jadad score: 3

Participants

331 adults randomised, 265 completed: 265M 66F Age range 12‐74 years Inclusion criteria: Diagnosis of asthma (ATS criteria 1987) for at least 6 months FEV1 50‐80 (% predicted) 15% or greater reversibility in FEV1 after inhaled beta2 agonist During run‐in: 12 or less puffs/day albuterol 4 or less mornings when PEFR decreased 20% or less than previous night PEFR 2 or less nights wakening requiring albuterol Good compliance Exclusion criteria: Smoking Use of any oral, inhaled or topical steroid within last month of study Oral steroids for 2 months or longer within last 6 month

Interventions

1. FP 50 mcg 1 actuation 2xdaily (100 mcg/d)

2. FP 100 mcg 1 actuation 2xdaily (200 mcg/d)

3. FP 250 mcg 1 actuation 2xdaily (500 mcg/d)

Delivery device: Diskhaler DPI

Outcomes

Outcomes expressed as change compared to baseline: FEV1 FVC FEF 25‐75% Morning PEFR Evening PEFR Daily asthma score Change in night time awakenings Daily use of beta2 agonist Probability of remaining in study Physician global assessment of efficacy Oro‐pharyngeal side effects

Notes

No reply from author to clarify details of randomisation method

For continuous outcomes change scores from baseline to endpoint (i.e. point of withdrawal) were reported

A priori criteria for withdrawal due to lack of efficacy were established based on FEV1, morning PEFR, night‐time awakenings or clinical exacerbation requiring emergency hospital treatment

Study also included a placebo treatment arm: results not considered in this review

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Unclear risk

Described as randomised; other information not available

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

Information not available

Blinding?
All outcomes

Low risk

Identical inhaler devices

Wolfe 1996

Methods

Setting: multicentre study USA, hospital outpatient clinics
Length of intervention period: 12 weeks
Randomisation: yes, method not stated
Allocation concealment: unclear
Design: parallel group
Masking: double blind
Excluded: not stated
Withdrawals: stated
Baseline characteristics: comparable
Jadad score: 3

Participants

304 adults: 169M 135F Age range: 12‐87 years Inclusion criteria: 12 years of age or older Diagnosis of moderate asthma, for at least 6 months Current treatment with inhaled corticosteroids and regular/as needed beta2 agonists Exclusion criteria: During run‐in period: More than 12 puffs albuterol daily for 3 or more days Diurnal variation in PEFR > 20% for 4 or more days Awakening more than 2 nights due to asthma symptoms And: Systemic steroids in last month Significant concurrent disease Pregnancy or lactation

Interventions

1. FP 100 mcg 2xdaily (200 mcg/d)

2. FP 250 mcg 2xdaily (500 mcg/d)

3. FP 500 mcg 2xdaily (1000 mcg/d)

Delivery device: MDI

Outcomes

Outcomes expressed as change compared to baseline: FEV1 Morning PEFR Evening PEFR Daily use of beta2 agonist Daily cough score Daily wheezing score Daily breathlessness score Daily asthma symptom score Probability of remaining in the study Physician related global assessment of efficacy Oro‐pharyngeal side effects Morning plasma cortisol

Notes

No reply from author to clarify details of randomisation method

For continuous outcomes change scores from baseline to endpoint (i.e. point of withdrawal) were reported

A priori criteria for withdrawal due to lack of efficacy were established based on FEV1, morning PEFR, night‐time awakenings or clinical exacerbation requiring emergency hospital treatment

Study also included a placebo treatment arm: results not considered in this review

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Adequate sequence generation?

Unclear risk

Described as randomised; no other information available

Allocation concealment?

Unclear risk

Information not available

Blinding?
All outcomes

Low risk

Identical inhaler devices

ACTH: adrenocorticotropic hormone; ATS: American Thoracic Society; BDP: beclomethasone dipropionate; BHR: bronchial hyperresponsiveness; BUD: budesonide; DPI: dry powder inhaler; FEF25‐75: forced expiratory flow at 25 to 75% of FVC; FEV1: forced expired volume in one second; FP: fluticasone propionate; FSC: fluticasone/salmeterol combination; FVC: forced vital capacity; ICS: inhaled corticosteroid; ITT: intension‐to‐treat; mcg/d: micrograms per day; MDI: metered dose inhaler; PC20 FEV1: provocative concentration of inhalant required to produce a 20% fall in FEV1; PD20 FEV1: provocative dose of inhalant required to produce a 20% fall in FEV1; PEFR: peak expiratory flow rate; TA: triamcinolone acetonide

Characteristics of excluded studies [ordered by study ID]

Study

Reason for exclusion

Ayres 2000

Delivery device comparison

Bisgaard 1999

This study assessed a group of young children including infants under the age of two years

Dorini 2001

Outcomes not relevant

FLTA2007

Placebo controlled study

Fowler 2002

Wrong comparison

Harrison 2001

Wrong comparison

Kelly 2001

Varying dose of FP

Laforce 2000

Wrong comparison

Lipworth 1997

Crossover study with intervention periods of only 4 days

Lundback 1993

Delivery device comparison

Lundback 1994

Delivery device comparison

Medici 2000

Outcomes not relevant

Murray 1998

Wrong comparison

Pieters 1998

Delivery device comparison

Visser 2001

Wrong comparison

Wittmann 1999

Wrong comparison

Wolfe 2000

Comparison of QID versus BID administration of 200mcg FP

ZuWallack 2000

Once versus twice daily administration of FP (same dosage with different dosing strategy compared)

Data and analyses

Open in table viewer
Comparison 1. Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 100 mcg/d (all ages)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 100 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

Comparison 1 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 100 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

1.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 100 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 2 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

Comparison 1 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 100 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 2 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

2.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 100 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 3 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

Comparison 1 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 100 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 3 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

3.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 100 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 4 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.

Comparison 1 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 100 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 4 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.

4.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5 Change in number of night‐time awakenings/week compared to baseline Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 100 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 5 Change in number of night‐time awakenings/week compared to baseline.

Comparison 1 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 100 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 5 Change in number of night‐time awakenings/week compared to baseline.

5.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 100 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 6 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).

Comparison 1 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 100 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 6 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).

6.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7 Number of patients withdrawn due to lack of efficacy Show forest plot

1

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 1.7

Comparison 1 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 100 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 7 Number of patients withdrawn due to lack of efficacy.

Comparison 1 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 100 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 7 Number of patients withdrawn due to lack of efficacy.

7.1 Children

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7.2 Adults

1

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Open in table viewer
Comparison 2. Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres) Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

Comparison 2 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

1.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.2 Adults

2

313

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.04 [‐0.16, 0.08]

2 Change in FVC compared to baseline (litres) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 2 Change in FVC compared to baseline (litres).

Comparison 2 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 2 Change in FVC compared to baseline (litres).

2.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3 Change in FEF25‐75 compared to baseline (L/second) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 2.3

Comparison 2 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 3 Change in FEF25‐75 compared to baseline (L/second).

Comparison 2 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 3 Change in FEF25‐75 compared to baseline (L/second).

3.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 2.4

Comparison 2 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 4 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

Comparison 2 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 4 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

4.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.2 Adults

2

313

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐7.49 [‐17.31, 2.33]

5 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 2.5

Comparison 2 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 5 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

Comparison 2 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 5 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

5.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.2 Adults

2

313

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐7.95 [‐17.24, 1.34]

6 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline Show forest plot

2

313

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.32 [0.10, 0.54]

Analysis 2.6

Comparison 2 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 6 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.

Comparison 2 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 6 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.

6.1 Children

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.2 Adults

2

313

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.32 [0.10, 0.54]

7 Change in number of night‐time awakenings/week compared to baseline Show forest plot

2

313

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.09 [0.02, 0.16]

Analysis 2.7

Comparison 2 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 7 Change in number of night‐time awakenings/week compared to baseline.

Comparison 2 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 7 Change in number of night‐time awakenings/week compared to baseline.

7.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7.2 Adults

2

313

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.09 [0.02, 0.16]

8 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d) Show forest plot

2

313

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.07 [‐0.37, 0.51]

Analysis 2.8

Comparison 2 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 8 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).

Comparison 2 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 8 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).

8.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8.2 Adults

2

313

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.07 [‐0.37, 0.51]

9 Number of patients withdrawn due to lack of efficacy Show forest plot

2

313

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.48 [0.88, 2.46]

Analysis 2.9

Comparison 2 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 9 Number of patients withdrawn due to lack of efficacy.

Comparison 2 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 9 Number of patients withdrawn due to lack of efficacy.

9.1 Children

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9.2 Adults

2

313

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.48 [0.88, 2.46]

10 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients) Show forest plot

2

322

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.52 [0.14, 1.97]

Analysis 2.10

Comparison 2 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 10 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).

Comparison 2 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 10 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).

10.1 Children

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10.2 Adults

2

322

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.52 [0.14, 1.97]

11 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

2

322

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.27 [0.05, 1.35]

Analysis 2.11

Comparison 2 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 11 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).

Comparison 2 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 11 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).

11.1 Children

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11.2 Adults

2

322

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.27 [0.05, 1.35]

12 Physician global rated efficacy: ineffective Show forest plot

1

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 2.12

Comparison 2 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 12 Physician global rated efficacy: ineffective.

Comparison 2 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 12 Physician global rated efficacy: ineffective.

12.1 Children

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.2 Adults

1

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Open in table viewer
Comparison 3. Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres) Show forest plot

10

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

1.1 Children

4

656

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.04 [‐0.09, 0.01]

1.2 Adults

6

887

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.03 [‐0.02, 0.07]

2 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres) Show forest plot

10

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 3.2

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 2 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 2 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

2.1 Children

4

656

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.03 [‐0.08, 0.02]

2.2 Adults

6

887

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.01 [‐0.05, 0.07]

3 FEV1 (% predicted) Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 3.3

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 3 FEV1 (% predicted).

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 3 FEV1 (% predicted).

3.1 Children

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4 FEV1 (% predicted) Show forest plot

2

432

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.52 [‐3.83, 2.79]

Analysis 3.4

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 4 FEV1 (% predicted).

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 4 FEV1 (% predicted).

4.1 Children

1

179

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐2.0 [‐6.00, 2.00]

4.2 Adults

1

253

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

2.70 [‐3.19, 8.59]

5 FEV1 Litres Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 3.5

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 5 FEV1 Litres.

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 5 FEV1 Litres.

5.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6 PEF (L/min) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 3.6

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 6 PEF (L/min).

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 6 PEF (L/min).

6.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7 Change in clinic PEFR compared to baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 3.7

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 7 Change in clinic PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 7 Change in clinic PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

7.1 Children

2

351

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.00 [‐6.84, 12.84]

7.2 Adults

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

11

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 3.8

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 8 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 8 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

8.1 Children

4

710

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐3.67 [‐9.81, 2.46]

8.2 Adults

7

1148

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐7.04 [‐11.87, ‐2.20]

9 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

6

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 3.9

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 9 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 9 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

9.1 Children

2

351

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐4.50 [‐11.77, 2.77]

9.2 Adults

4

648

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐7.04 [‐12.66, ‐1.43]

10 Rescue medication usage Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 3.10

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 10 Rescue medication usage.

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 10 Rescue medication usage.

10.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d) Show forest plot

9

1409

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.14 [‐0.09, 0.37]

Analysis 3.11

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 11 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 11 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).

11.1 Children

3

522

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.18 [‐0.14, 0.49]

11.2 Adults

6

887

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.10 [‐0.21, 0.42]

12 Symptom scores Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 3.12

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 12 Symptom scores.

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 12 Symptom scores.

12.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

13 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline Show forest plot

8

1252

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.04 [‐0.07, 0.15]

Analysis 3.13

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 13 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 13 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.

13.1 Children

3

522

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.01 [‐0.17, 0.18]

13.2 Adults

5

730

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.06 [‐0.08, 0.21]

14 Change in number of night‐time awakenings/week compared to baseline Show forest plot

4

661

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.05 [0.01, 0.09]

Analysis 3.14

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 14 Change in number of night‐time awakenings/week compared to baseline.

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 14 Change in number of night‐time awakenings/week compared to baseline.

14.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

14.2 Adults

4

661

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.05 [0.01, 0.09]

15 Percentage of symptom‐free days Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 3.15

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 15 Percentage of symptom‐free days.

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 15 Percentage of symptom‐free days.

15.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16 Change in night‐time awakening score compared to baseline Show forest plot

6

921

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.17 [0.04, 0.30]

Analysis 3.16

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 16 Change in night‐time awakening score compared to baseline.

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 16 Change in night‐time awakening score compared to baseline.

16.1 Children

2

351

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.17 [‐0.04, 0.38]

16.2 Adults

4

570

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.17 [0.01, 0.34]

17 HRQOL: Functional Status IIR questionaire (short version) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 3.17

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 17 HRQOL: Functional Status IIR questionaire (short version).

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 17 HRQOL: Functional Status IIR questionaire (short version).

17.1 Children

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

17.2 Adults

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

18 HRQOL: Sleep Scale Children questionnaire Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 3.18

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 18 HRQOL: Sleep Scale Children questionnaire.

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 18 HRQOL: Sleep Scale Children questionnaire.

18.1 Children

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

18.2 Adults

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

19 HRQOL: Quality of Life of Parents of Asthmatic Children questionnaire, burden dimension Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 3.19

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 19 HRQOL: Quality of Life of Parents of Asthmatic Children questionnaire, burden dimension.

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 19 HRQOL: Quality of Life of Parents of Asthmatic Children questionnaire, burden dimension.

19.1 Children

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

19.2 Adults

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

20 HRQOL: Quality of Life of Parents of Asthmatic Children questionnaire, subjective norms dimension Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 3.20

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 20 HRQOL: Quality of Life of Parents of Asthmatic Children questionnaire, subjective norms dimension.

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 20 HRQOL: Quality of Life of Parents of Asthmatic Children questionnaire, subjective norms dimension.

20.1 Children

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

20.2 Adults

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

21 HRQOL: Quality of Life of Parents of Asthmatic Children questionnaire, subjective norms dimension Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 3.21

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 21 HRQOL: Quality of Life of Parents of Asthmatic Children questionnaire, subjective norms dimension.

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 21 HRQOL: Quality of Life of Parents of Asthmatic Children questionnaire, subjective norms dimension.

21.1 Children

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

21.2 Adults

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

22 Physician global rated efficacy: ineffective Show forest plot

2

357

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.37 [0.77, 2.44]

Analysis 3.22

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 22 Physician global rated efficacy: ineffective.

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 22 Physician global rated efficacy: ineffective.

22.1 Children

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

22.2 Adults

2

357

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.37 [0.77, 2.44]

23 Withdrawal due to asthma exacerbation (No. of patients) Show forest plot

1

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 3.23

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 23 Withdrawal due to asthma exacerbation (No. of patients).

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 23 Withdrawal due to asthma exacerbation (No. of patients).

23.1 Children

1

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

23.2 Adults

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

24 Withdrawals due to adverse events Show forest plot

3

627

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.16 [0.54, 2.47]

Analysis 3.24

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 24 Withdrawals due to adverse events.

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 24 Withdrawals due to adverse events.

24.1 Children

0

0

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

24.2 Adults

3

627

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.16 [0.54, 2.47]

25 Number of patients withdrawn due to lack of efficacy Show forest plot

9

1657

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.76, 1.35]

Analysis 3.25

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 25 Number of patients withdrawn due to lack of efficacy.

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 25 Number of patients withdrawn due to lack of efficacy.

25.1 Children

3

522

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.25 [0.79, 1.97]

25.2 Adults

6

1135

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.88 [0.61, 1.28]

26 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

6

1150

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.98 [0.46, 2.08]

Analysis 3.26

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 26 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 26 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).

26.1 Children

2

391

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.33 [0.30, 5.90]

26.2 Adults

4

759

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.88 [0.37, 2.11]

27 Headaches Show forest plot

3

511

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.62 [0.15, 2.60]

Analysis 3.27

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 27 Headaches.

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 27 Headaches.

27.1 Children

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

27.2 Adults

3

511

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.62 [0.15, 2.60]

28 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

5

841

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.87 [0.71, 4.93]

Analysis 3.28

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 28 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 28 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).

28.1 Children

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

28.2 Adults

5

841

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.87 [0.71, 4.93]

29 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients) Show forest plot

7

1365

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.65 [0.27, 1.57]

Analysis 3.29

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 29 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 29 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).

29.1 Children

2

391

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.00 [0.20, 4.99]

29.2 Adults

5

974

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.54 [0.19, 1.55]

30 Urinary free cortisol excretion (mcg/24 hours) Show forest plot

2

228

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.70 [‐3.73, 2.32]

Analysis 3.30

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 30 Urinary free cortisol excretion (mcg/24 hours).

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 30 Urinary free cortisol excretion (mcg/24 hours).

30.1 Children

2

228

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.70 [‐3.73, 2.32]

30.2 Adults

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

31 Morning plasma cortisol (mcg/dL) Show forest plot

3

377

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.06 [‐1.01, 0.89]

Analysis 3.31

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 31 Morning plasma cortisol (mcg/dL).

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 31 Morning plasma cortisol (mcg/dL).

31.1 Children

2

333

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.07 [‐1.14, 0.99]

31.2 Adults

1

44

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [‐2.09, 2.09]

Open in table viewer
Comparison 4. Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (subgroups)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on study duration(litres) ‐ children Show forest plot

3

490

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.01 [‐0.07, 0.05]

Analysis 4.1

Comparison 4 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (subgroups), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on study duration(litres) ‐ children.

Comparison 4 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (subgroups), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on study duration(litres) ‐ children.

1.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.2 1‐5 months

3

490

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.01 [‐0.07, 0.05]

1.3 6 months or more

0

0

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on study duration (litres) ‐ adults Show forest plot

6

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.03 [‐0.02, 0.07]

Analysis 4.2

Comparison 4 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (subgroups), Outcome 2 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on study duration (litres) ‐ adults.

Comparison 4 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (subgroups), Outcome 2 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on study duration (litres) ‐ adults.

2.1 1‐4 weeks

0

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.2 1‐5 months

6

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.03 [‐0.02, 0.07]

2.3 6 months or more

0

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres) based on delivery devices ‐ children Show forest plot

3

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.01 [‐0.07, 0.05]

Analysis 4.3

Comparison 4 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (subgroups), Outcome 3 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres) based on delivery devices ‐ children.

Comparison 4 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (subgroups), Outcome 3 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres) based on delivery devices ‐ children.

3.1 MDI

0

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.2 DPI

3

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.01 [‐0.07, 0.05]

4 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on delivery devices (litres) ‐ adults Show forest plot

6

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.03 [‐0.02, 0.07]

Analysis 4.4

Comparison 4 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (subgroups), Outcome 4 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on delivery devices (litres) ‐ adults.

Comparison 4 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (subgroups), Outcome 4 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on delivery devices (litres) ‐ adults.

4.1 MDI

3

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.02 [‐0.08, 0.12]

4.2 DPI

3

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.03 [‐0.02, 0.08]

5 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on degrees of severity (litres) ‐ children Show forest plot

3

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.01 [‐0.07, 0.05]

Analysis 4.5

Comparison 4 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (subgroups), Outcome 5 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on degrees of severity (litres) ‐ children.

Comparison 4 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (subgroups), Outcome 5 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on degrees of severity (litres) ‐ children.

5.1 Mild to moderate

0

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.2 Moderate

3

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.01 [‐0.07, 0.05]

6 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on degrees of severity (litres) ‐ adults Show forest plot

6

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.03 [‐0.02, 0.07]

Analysis 4.6

Comparison 4 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (subgroups), Outcome 6 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on degrees of severity (litres) ‐ adults.

Comparison 4 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (subgroups), Outcome 6 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on degrees of severity (litres) ‐ adults.

6.1 Mild to moderate

0

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.2 Moderate

6

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.03 [‐0.02, 0.07]

Open in table viewer
Comparison 5. Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 FEV1 (% predicted) Show forest plot

4

551

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.96 [‐3.45, 1.53]

Analysis 5.1

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 1 FEV1 (% predicted).

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 1 FEV1 (% predicted).

1.1 Children

2

114

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐2.48 [‐8.60, 3.64]

1.2 Adults

2

437

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.66 [‐3.39, 2.06]

2 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres) Show forest plot

9

1283

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.01 [‐0.06, 0.04]

Analysis 5.2

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 2 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 2 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

2.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.2 Adults

9

1283

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.01 [‐0.06, 0.04]

3 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres ‐ imputed estimates) Show forest plot

11

1720

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.01 [‐0.04, 0.05]

Analysis 5.3

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 3 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres ‐ imputed estimates).

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 3 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres ‐ imputed estimates).

3.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.2 Adults

11

1720

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.01 [‐0.04, 0.05]

4 Change in FVC compared to baseline (litres) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 5.4

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 4 Change in FVC compared to baseline (litres).

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 4 Change in FVC compared to baseline (litres).

4.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5 Change in FEF25‐75 compared to baseline (L/second) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 5.5

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 5 Change in FEF25‐75 compared to baseline (L/second).

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 5 Change in FEF25‐75 compared to baseline (L/second).

5.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min ‐ imputed/estimated values) Show forest plot

13

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 5.6

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 6 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min ‐ imputed/estimated values).

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 6 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min ‐ imputed/estimated values).

6.1 Children

2

876

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐7.92 [‐12.93, ‐2.91]

6.2 Adults

11

1713

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.97 [‐5.77, 1.82]

7 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

13

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 5.7

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 7 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 7 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

7.1 Children

2

876

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐7.92 [‐12.93, ‐2.91]

7.2 Adults

11

1703

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐4.84 [‐9.37, ‐0.31]

8 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

7

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 5.8

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 8 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 8 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

8.1 Children

2

874

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐9.36 [‐14.37, ‐4.35]

8.2 Adults

5

776

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐3.76 [‐9.18, 1.66]

9 PC20 Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 5.9

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 9 PC20.

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 9 PC20.

9.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10 PD20 Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 5.10

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 10 PD20.

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 10 PD20.

10.1 Children

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10.2 Adults

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d) Show forest plot

7

931

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.18 [‐0.08, 0.43]

Analysis 5.11

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 11 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 11 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).

11.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11.2 Adults

7

931

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.18 [‐0.08, 0.43]

12 Change in number of night‐time awakenings/week compared to baseline Show forest plot

2

334

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.01 [‐0.05, 0.04]

Analysis 5.12

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 12 Change in number of night‐time awakenings/week compared to baseline.

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 12 Change in number of night‐time awakenings/week compared to baseline.

12.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.2 Adults

2

334

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.01 [‐0.05, 0.04]

13 Change in % nights without waking Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 5.13

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 13 Change in % nights without waking.

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 13 Change in % nights without waking.

13.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

13.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

14 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline Show forest plot

7

930

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.11 [‐0.02, 0.24]

Analysis 5.14

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 14 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 14 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.

14.1 Children

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

14.2 Adults

7

930

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.11 [‐0.02, 0.24]

15 Percentage of symptom‐free days Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 5.15

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 15 Percentage of symptom‐free days.

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 15 Percentage of symptom‐free days.

15.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16 Health related quality of life ‐ AQLQ (absolute scores)

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

16.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16.2 Adults

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

17 Number of patients withdrawn due to lack of efficacy Show forest plot

7

1294

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.41 [1.01, 1.98]

Analysis 5.17

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 17 Number of patients withdrawn due to lack of efficacy.

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 17 Number of patients withdrawn due to lack of efficacy.

17.1 Children

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

17.2 Adults

7

1294

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.41 [1.01, 1.98]

18 Exacerbations requiring oral steroids Show forest plot

2

883

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.21 [0.72, 2.05]

Analysis 5.18

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 18 Exacerbations requiring oral steroids.

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 18 Exacerbations requiring oral steroids.

18.1 Children

2

883

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.21 [0.72, 2.05]

18.2 Adults

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

19 Exacerbations requiring hospitalisation Show forest plot

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 5.19

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 19 Exacerbations requiring hospitalisation.

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 19 Exacerbations requiring hospitalisation.

19.1 Children

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

19.2 Adults

0

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

20 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

8

1752

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.87 [0.47, 1.61]

Analysis 5.20

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 20 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 20 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).

20.1 Children

1

528

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.65 [0.19, 2.27]

20.2 Adults

7

1224

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.95 [0.47, 1.95]

21 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

8

1825

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.98 [0.60, 1.63]

Analysis 5.21

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 21 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 21 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).

21.1 Children

2

883

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.34 [0.58, 3.08]

21.2 Adults

6

942

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.83 [0.44, 1.55]

22 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients) Show forest plot

7

1693

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.76 [0.40, 1.46]

Analysis 5.22

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 22 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 22 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).

22.1 Children

1

528

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.30 [0.29, 5.79]

22.2 Adults

6

1165

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.67 [0.32, 1.38]

23 Withdrawals due to adverse events Show forest plot

5

1161

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.65 [0.22, 1.92]

Analysis 5.23

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 23 Withdrawals due to adverse events.

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 23 Withdrawals due to adverse events.

23.1 Children

1

528

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.98 [0.14, 6.99]

23.2 Adults

4

633

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.55 [0.15, 2.03]

24 No. patients with </=18 mcg/dL poststimulation cortisol Show forest plot

2

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 5.24

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 24 No. patients with </=18 mcg/dL poststimulation cortisol.

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 24 No. patients with </=18 mcg/dL poststimulation cortisol.

24.1 Children

0

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

24.2 Adults

2

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

25 AUC serum cortisol Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 5.25

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 25 AUC serum cortisol.

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 25 AUC serum cortisol.

25.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

25.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

26 Change in peak plasma cortisol expression Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 5.26

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 26 Change in peak plasma cortisol expression.

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 26 Change in peak plasma cortisol expression.

26.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

26.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Open in table viewer
Comparison 6. Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (subgroups)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on study duration (litres) ‐ adults Show forest plot

11

1720

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.01 [‐0.04, 0.05]

Analysis 6.1

Comparison 6 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (subgroups), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on study duration (litres) ‐ adults.

Comparison 6 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (subgroups), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on study duration (litres) ‐ adults.

1.1 1‐4 weeks

2

293

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.09 [‐0.01, 0.19]

1.2 1‐5 months

8

1237

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.03 [‐0.08, 0.02]

1.3 6 months or longer

1

190

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.08 [‐0.03, 0.19]

2 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on delivery devices (litres) ‐ adults Show forest plot

11

1720

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.01 [‐0.04, 0.05]

Analysis 6.2

Comparison 6 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (subgroups), Outcome 2 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on delivery devices (litres) ‐ adults.

Comparison 6 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (subgroups), Outcome 2 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on delivery devices (litres) ‐ adults.

2.1 MDI

8

1226

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.02 [‐0.03, 0.07]

2.2 DPI

3

494

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.02 [‐0.11, 0.06]

3 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on degrees of severity (litres) ‐ adults Show forest plot

11

1720

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.01 [‐0.04, 0.05]

Analysis 6.3

Comparison 6 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (subgroups), Outcome 3 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on degrees of severity (litres) ‐ adults.

Comparison 6 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (subgroups), Outcome 3 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on degrees of severity (litres) ‐ adults.

3.1 Mild to moderate

3

194

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.05 [‐0.18, 0.08]

3.2 Moderate

6

1136

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.01 [‐0.05, 0.06]

3.3 Mixed

1

200

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.05 [‐0.19, 0.09]

3.4 Unclear

1

190

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.08 [‐0.03, 0.19]

Open in table viewer
Comparison 7. Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres) Show forest plot

3

351

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.01 [‐0.10, 0.09]

Analysis 7.1

Comparison 7 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

Comparison 7 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

1.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.2 Adults

3

351

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.01 [‐0.10, 0.09]

2 FEV1 (% predicted) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 7.2

Comparison 7 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 2 FEV1 (% predicted).

Comparison 7 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 2 FEV1 (% predicted).

2.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

3

593

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐7.97 [‐14.58, ‐1.35]

Analysis 7.3

Comparison 7 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 3 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

Comparison 7 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 3 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

3.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.2 Adults

3

593

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐7.97 [‐14.58, ‐1.35]

4 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 7.4

Comparison 7 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 4 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

Comparison 7 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 4 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

4.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5 Percentage of symptom‐free days Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 7.5

Comparison 7 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 5 Percentage of symptom‐free days.

Comparison 7 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 5 Percentage of symptom‐free days.

5.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline Show forest plot

2

194

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.31 [0.03, 0.60]

Analysis 7.6

Comparison 7 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 6 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.

Comparison 7 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 6 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.

6.1 Children

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.2 Adults

2

194

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.31 [0.03, 0.60]

7 Change in number of night‐time awakenings/week compared to baseline Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 7.7

Comparison 7 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 7 Change in number of night‐time awakenings/week compared to baseline.

Comparison 7 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 7 Change in number of night‐time awakenings/week compared to baseline.

7.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 7.8

Comparison 7 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 8 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).

Comparison 7 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 8 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).

8.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9 Physician global rated efficacy: ineffective Show forest plot

2

400

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.25 [0.81, 1.93]

Analysis 7.9

Comparison 7 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 9 Physician global rated efficacy: ineffective.

Comparison 7 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 9 Physician global rated efficacy: ineffective.

9.1 Children

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9.2 Adults

2

400

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.25 [0.81, 1.93]

10 Number of patients withdrawn due to lack of efficacy Show forest plot

2

454

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.30 [0.90, 5.90]

Analysis 7.10

Comparison 7 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 10 Number of patients withdrawn due to lack of efficacy.

Comparison 7 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 10 Number of patients withdrawn due to lack of efficacy.

10.1 Children

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10.2 Adults

2

454

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.30 [0.90, 5.90]

11 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

3

615

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.02 [0.29, 3.56]

Analysis 7.11

Comparison 7 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 11 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).

Comparison 7 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 11 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).

11.1 Children

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11.2 Adults

3

615

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.02 [0.29, 3.56]

12 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients) Show forest plot

3

615

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.28 [0.08, 0.92]

Analysis 7.12

Comparison 7 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 12 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).

Comparison 7 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 12 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).

12.1 Children

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.2 Adults

3

615

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.28 [0.08, 0.92]

13 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

3

615

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.89 [0.32, 2.49]

Analysis 7.13

Comparison 7 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 13 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).

Comparison 7 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 13 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).

13.1 Children

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

13.2 Adults

3

615

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.89 [0.32, 2.49]

14 Plasma Cortisol (AUC) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 7.14

Comparison 7 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 14 Plasma Cortisol (AUC).

Comparison 7 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 14 Plasma Cortisol (AUC).

14.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

14.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15 Clinic PEF (L/min ‐ change from baseline) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 7.15

Comparison 7 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 15 Clinic PEF (L/min ‐ change from baseline).

Comparison 7 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 15 Clinic PEF (L/min ‐ change from baseline).

15.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Open in table viewer
Comparison 8. Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (subgroups)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on study duration (litres) ‐ adults Show forest plot

3

351

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.01 [‐0.10, 0.09]

Analysis 8.1

Comparison 8 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (subgroups), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on study duration (litres) ‐ adults.

Comparison 8 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (subgroups), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on study duration (litres) ‐ adults.

1.1 1‐4 weeks

1

23

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.45 [‐0.88, ‐0.02]

1.2 1‐5 months

2

328

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.02 [‐0.08, 0.11]

1.3 6 months or longer

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on delivery devices (litres) ‐ adults Show forest plot

3

351

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.01 [‐0.10, 0.09]

Analysis 8.2

Comparison 8 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (subgroups), Outcome 2 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on delivery devices (litres) ‐ adults.

Comparison 8 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (subgroups), Outcome 2 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on delivery devices (litres) ‐ adults.

2.1 MDI

1

23

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.45 [‐0.88, ‐0.02]

2.2 DPI

2

328

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.02 [‐0.08, 0.11]

3 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on degrees of severity (litres) ‐ adults Show forest plot

3

351

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.01 [‐0.10, 0.09]

Analysis 8.3

Comparison 8 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (subgroups), Outcome 3 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on degrees of severity (litres) ‐ adults.

Comparison 8 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (subgroups), Outcome 3 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on degrees of severity (litres) ‐ adults.

3.1 Mild to moderate

1

23

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.45 [‐0.88, ‐0.02]

3.2 Moderate

2

328

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.02 [‐0.08, 0.11]

Open in table viewer
Comparison 9. Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 400‐500 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 FEV1 (Change from baseline ‐ litres) Show forest plot

5

900

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.01 [‐0.06, 0.04]

Analysis 9.1

Comparison 9 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 400‐500 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 1 FEV1 (Change from baseline ‐ litres).

Comparison 9 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 400‐500 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 1 FEV1 (Change from baseline ‐ litres).

1.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.2 Adults

5

900

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.01 [‐0.06, 0.04]

2 Change in morning PEF (L/min) Show forest plot

4

905

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐2.30 [‐7.94, 3.35]

Analysis 9.2

Comparison 9 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 400‐500 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 2 Change in morning PEF (L/min).

Comparison 9 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 400‐500 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 2 Change in morning PEF (L/min).

2.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.2 Adults

4

905

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐2.30 [‐7.94, 3.35]

3 Change in evening PEF (L/min) Show forest plot

2

505

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.83 [‐2.94, 14.60]

Analysis 9.3

Comparison 9 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 400‐500 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 3 Change in evening PEF (L/min).

Comparison 9 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 400‐500 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 3 Change in evening PEF (L/min).

3.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.2 Adults

2

505

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.83 [‐2.94, 14.60]

4 Change in rescue medication (puffs/d) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 9.4

Comparison 9 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 400‐500 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 4 Change in rescue medication (puffs/d).

Comparison 9 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 400‐500 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 4 Change in rescue medication (puffs/d).

4.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5 Health‐related quality of life ‐ AQLQ (absolute scores)

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

5.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.2 Adults

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6 Change in daily symptoms compared with baseline Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 9.6

Comparison 9 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 400‐500 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 6 Change in daily symptoms compared with baseline.

Comparison 9 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 400‐500 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 6 Change in daily symptoms compared with baseline.

6.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7 Nocturnal awakenings (awakenings per night)

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

7.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7.2 Adults

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8 Exacerbations requiring hospitalisation Show forest plot

1

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 9.8

Comparison 9 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 400‐500 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 8 Exacerbations requiring hospitalisation.

Comparison 9 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 400‐500 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 8 Exacerbations requiring hospitalisation.

8.1 Children

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8.2 Adults

1

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9 Exacerbations requiring OCS treatment Show forest plot

2

363

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.24 [0.77, 1.98]

Analysis 9.9

Comparison 9 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 400‐500 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 9 Exacerbations requiring OCS treatment.

Comparison 9 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 400‐500 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 9 Exacerbations requiring OCS treatment.

9.1 Children

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9.2 Adults

2

363

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.24 [0.77, 1.98]

10 Withdrawals (total) Show forest plot

5

1039

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.27 [0.88, 1.83]

Analysis 9.10

Comparison 9 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 400‐500 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 10 Withdrawals (total).

Comparison 9 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 400‐500 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 10 Withdrawals (total).

10.1 Children

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10.2 Adults

5

1039

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.27 [0.88, 1.83]

11 Withdrawals (adverse events) Show forest plot

4

841

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.46 [0.17, 1.25]

Analysis 9.11

Comparison 9 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 400‐500 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 11 Withdrawals (adverse events).

Comparison 9 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 400‐500 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 11 Withdrawals (adverse events).

11.1 Children

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11.2 Adults

4

841

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.46 [0.17, 1.25]

12 Withdrawals (lack of efficacy) Show forest plot

2

537

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.67 [0.73, 3.81]

Analysis 9.12

Comparison 9 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 400‐500 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 12 Withdrawals (lack of efficacy).

Comparison 9 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 400‐500 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 12 Withdrawals (lack of efficacy).

12.1 Children

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.2 Adults

2

537

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.67 [0.73, 3.81]

13 Drug‐related adverse events

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

13.1 Children

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

13.2 Adults

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

14 HPA function data (am cortisol <5mcg/dL)

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

14.1 Children

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

14.2 Adults

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Open in table viewer
Comparison 10. Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 400‐500 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (subgroups)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Change from baseline in FEV1 based on study duration (litres) ‐ adults Show forest plot

5

900

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.01 [‐0.06, 0.04]

Analysis 10.1

Comparison 10 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 400‐500 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (subgroups), Outcome 1 Change from baseline in FEV1 based on study duration (litres) ‐ adults.

Comparison 10 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 400‐500 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (subgroups), Outcome 1 Change from baseline in FEV1 based on study duration (litres) ‐ adults.

1.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.2 1‐5 months

3

435

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.02 [‐0.09, 0.05]

1.3 6 months or longer

2

465

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [‐0.07, 0.07]

2 Change from baseline in FEV1 based on delivery devices (litres) ‐ adults Show forest plot

5

900

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.01 [‐0.06, 0.04]

Analysis 10.2

Comparison 10 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 400‐500 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (subgroups), Outcome 2 Change from baseline in FEV1 based on delivery devices (litres) ‐ adults.

Comparison 10 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 400‐500 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (subgroups), Outcome 2 Change from baseline in FEV1 based on delivery devices (litres) ‐ adults.

2.1 MDI

3

435

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.02 [‐0.09, 0.05]

2.2 DPI

2

465

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [‐0.07, 0.07]

3 Change from baseline in FEV1 based on degree of severity (litres) ‐ adults Show forest plot

5

900

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.01 [‐0.06, 0.04]

Analysis 10.3

Comparison 10 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 400‐500 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (subgroups), Outcome 3 Change from baseline in FEV1 based on degree of severity (litres) ‐ adults.

Comparison 10 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 400‐500 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (subgroups), Outcome 3 Change from baseline in FEV1 based on degree of severity (litres) ‐ adults.

3.1 Mild to moderate

1

38

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.1 [‐0.08, 0.28]

3.2 Moderate

3

575

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.03 [‐0.10, 0.04]

3.3 Moderate to severe

1

287

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [‐0.09, 0.09]

Open in table viewer
Comparison 11. Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 11.1

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

1.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 FEV1 (% predicted) Show forest plot

2

283

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.43 [‐5.72, 4.87]

Analysis 11.2

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 2 FEV1 (% predicted).

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 2 FEV1 (% predicted).

2.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.2 Adults

2

283

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.43 [‐5.72, 4.87]

3 FEV1 (Litres) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 11.3

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 3 FEV1 (Litres).

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 3 FEV1 (Litres).

3.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4 Change in FVC compared to baseline (litres) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 11.4

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 4 Change in FVC compared to baseline (litres).

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 4 Change in FVC compared to baseline (litres).

4.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5 FEF25‐75 Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 11.5

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 5 FEF25‐75.

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 5 FEF25‐75.

5.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6 Change in FEF25‐75 compared to baseline (L/second) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 11.6

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 6 Change in FEF25‐75 compared to baseline (L/second).

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 6 Change in FEF25‐75 compared to baseline (L/second).

6.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7 am PEF (Litres/min) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 11.7

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 7 am PEF (Litres/min).

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 7 am PEF (Litres/min).

7.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

2

419

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐21.86 [‐29.19, ‐14.53]

Analysis 11.8

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 8 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 8 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

8.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8.2 Adults

2

419

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐21.86 [‐29.19, ‐14.53]

9 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

2

419

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐12.66 [‐19.32, ‐5.99]

Analysis 11.9

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 9 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 9 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

9.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9.2 Adults

2

419

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐12.66 [‐19.32, ‐5.99]

10 Physician global rated efficacy: ineffective Show forest plot

1

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 11.10

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 10 Physician global rated efficacy: ineffective.

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 10 Physician global rated efficacy: ineffective.

10.1 Children

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10.2 Adults

1

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11 Symptoms Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 11.11

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 11 Symptoms.

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 11 Symptoms.

11.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12 Percentage of symptom‐free days Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 11.12

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 12 Percentage of symptom‐free days.

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 12 Percentage of symptom‐free days.

12.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

13 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline Show forest plot

1

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 11.13

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 13 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 13 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.

13.1 Children

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

13.2 Adults

1

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

14 Change in number of night‐time awakenings/week compared to baseline Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 11.14

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 14 Change in number of night‐time awakenings/week compared to baseline.

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 14 Change in number of night‐time awakenings/week compared to baseline.

14.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

14.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15 Rescue medication usage Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 11.15

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 15 Rescue medication usage.

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 15 Rescue medication usage.

15.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 11.16

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 16 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 16 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).

16.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

17 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

2

433

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.32 [0.11, 0.97]

Analysis 11.17

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 17 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 17 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).

17.1 Children

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

17.2 Adults

2

433

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.32 [0.11, 0.97]

18 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients) Show forest plot

2

433

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.18 [0.05, 0.59]

Analysis 11.18

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 18 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 18 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).

18.1 Children

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

18.2 Adults

2

433

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.18 [0.05, 0.59]

19 Withdrawals (total) Show forest plot

2

294

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.29 [1.59, 17.60]

Analysis 11.19

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 19 Withdrawals (total).

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 19 Withdrawals (total).

19.1 Children

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

19.2 Adults

2

294

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.29 [1.59, 17.60]

20 Number of patients withdrawn due to lack of efficacy Show forest plot

2

427

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.31 [2.18, 12.96]

Analysis 11.20

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 20 Number of patients withdrawn due to lack of efficacy.

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 20 Number of patients withdrawn due to lack of efficacy.

20.1 Children

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

20.2 Adults

2

427

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.31 [2.18, 12.96]

Open in table viewer
Comparison 12. Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres) Show forest plot

3

489

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.11 [‐0.19, ‐0.04]

Analysis 12.1

Comparison 12 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

Comparison 12 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

1.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.2 Adults

3

489

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.11 [‐0.19, ‐0.04]

2 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (%) Show forest plot

1

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 12.2

Comparison 12 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 2 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (%).

Comparison 12 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 2 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (%).

2.1 Children

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.2 Adults

1

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3 Change in FEV1 % predicted Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 12.3

Comparison 12 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 3 Change in FEV1 % predicted.

Comparison 12 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 3 Change in FEV1 % predicted.

3.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4 FEV1 (% predicted) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 12.4

Comparison 12 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 4 FEV1 (% predicted).

Comparison 12 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 4 FEV1 (% predicted).

4.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

4

763

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐8.32 [‐18.02, 1.37]

Analysis 12.5

Comparison 12 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 5 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

Comparison 12 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 5 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

5.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.2 Adults

4

763

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐8.32 [‐18.02, 1.37]

6 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

2

424

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐7.81 [‐14.66, ‐0.95]

Analysis 12.6

Comparison 12 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 6 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

Comparison 12 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 6 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

6.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.2 Adults

2

424

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐7.81 [‐14.66, ‐0.95]

7 Change in FVC compared to baseline (litres) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 12.7

Comparison 12 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 7 Change in FVC compared to baseline (litres).

Comparison 12 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 7 Change in FVC compared to baseline (litres).

7.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8 Change in FEF25‐75 compared to baseline (L/second) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 12.8

Comparison 12 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 8 Change in FEF25‐75 compared to baseline (L/second).

Comparison 12 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 8 Change in FEF25‐75 compared to baseline (L/second).

8.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9 PD20 Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 12.9

Comparison 12 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 9 PD20.

Comparison 12 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 9 PD20.

9.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline Show forest plot

2

291

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.06 [‐0.17, 0.29]

Analysis 12.10

Comparison 12 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 10 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.

Comparison 12 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 10 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.

10.1 Children

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10.2 Adults

2

291

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.06 [‐0.17, 0.29]

11 Change in number of night‐time awakenings/week compared to baseline Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 12.11

Comparison 12 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 11 Change in number of night‐time awakenings/week compared to baseline.

Comparison 12 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 11 Change in number of night‐time awakenings/week compared to baseline.

11.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12 Physician global rated efficacy: ineffective Show forest plot

2

400

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.34 [0.85, 2.12]

Analysis 12.12

Comparison 12 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 12 Physician global rated efficacy: ineffective.

Comparison 12 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 12 Physician global rated efficacy: ineffective.

12.1 Children

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.2 Adults

2

400

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.34 [0.85, 2.12]

13 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d) Show forest plot

2

291

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.11 [‐0.29, 0.50]

Analysis 12.13

Comparison 12 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 13 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).

Comparison 12 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 13 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).

13.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

13.2 Adults

2

291

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.11 [‐0.29, 0.50]

14 Number of patients withdrawn due to lack of efficacy Show forest plot

4

554

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.32 [0.73, 2.40]

Analysis 12.14

Comparison 12 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 14 Number of patients withdrawn due to lack of efficacy.

Comparison 12 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 14 Number of patients withdrawn due to lack of efficacy.

14.1 Children

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

14.2 Adults

4

554

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.32 [0.73, 2.40]

15 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

5

618

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.33 [0.16, 0.70]

Analysis 12.15

Comparison 12 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 15 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).

Comparison 12 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 15 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).

15.1 Children

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15.2 Adults

5

618

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.33 [0.16, 0.70]

16 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

4

452

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.49 [0.18, 1.39]

Analysis 12.16

Comparison 12 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 16 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).

Comparison 12 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 16 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).

16.1 Children

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16.2 Adults

4

452

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.49 [0.18, 1.39]

17 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients) Show forest plot

4

561

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.51 [0.24, 1.08]

Analysis 12.17

Comparison 12 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 17 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).

Comparison 12 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 17 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).

17.1 Children

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

17.2 Adults

4

561

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.51 [0.24, 1.08]

18 Change in peak plasma cortisol compared to baseline (mcg/dL) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 12.18

Comparison 12 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 18 Change in peak plasma cortisol compared to baseline (mcg/dL).

Comparison 12 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 18 Change in peak plasma cortisol compared to baseline (mcg/dL).

18.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

18.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

19 Change in morning plasma cortisol compared to baseline (mcg/dL) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 12.19

Comparison 12 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 19 Change in morning plasma cortisol compared to baseline (mcg/dL).

Comparison 12 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 19 Change in morning plasma cortisol compared to baseline (mcg/dL).

19.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

19.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Open in table viewer
Comparison 13. Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (subgroups)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on study duration (litres) ‐ adults Show forest plot

3

489

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.11 [‐0.19, ‐0.04]

Analysis 13.1

Comparison 13 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (subgroups), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on study duration (litres) ‐ adults.

Comparison 13 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (subgroups), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on study duration (litres) ‐ adults.

1.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.2 1‐5 months

3

489

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.11 [‐0.19, ‐0.04]

1.3 6 months or longer

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on delivery devices (litres) ‐ adults Show forest plot

3

489

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.11 [‐0.19, ‐0.04]

Analysis 13.2

Comparison 13 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (subgroups), Outcome 2 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on delivery devices (litres) ‐ adults.

Comparison 13 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (subgroups), Outcome 2 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on delivery devices (litres) ‐ adults.

2.1 MDI

2

357

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.10 [‐0.19, ‐0.02]

2.2 DPI

1

132

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.15 [‐0.32, 0.02]

3 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on degrees of severity (litres) ‐ adults Show forest plot

3

489

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.11 [‐0.19, ‐0.04]

Analysis 13.3

Comparison 13 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (subgroups), Outcome 3 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on degrees of severity (litres) ‐ adults.

Comparison 13 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (subgroups), Outcome 3 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on degrees of severity (litres) ‐ adults.

3.1 Mild to moderate

1

159

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.12 [‐0.26, 0.02]

3.2 Moderate

2

330

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.11 [‐0.20, ‐0.02]

Open in table viewer
Comparison 14. Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 4‐500 versus 1500‐2000mcg/d (all ages)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 FEV1 (Change from baseline ‐ litres) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 14.1

Comparison 14 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 4‐500 versus 1500‐2000mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 1 FEV1 (Change from baseline ‐ litres).

Comparison 14 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 4‐500 versus 1500‐2000mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 1 FEV1 (Change from baseline ‐ litres).

1.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 Clinic PEF (L/min ‐ change from baseline) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 14.2

Comparison 14 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 4‐500 versus 1500‐2000mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 2 Clinic PEF (L/min ‐ change from baseline).

Comparison 14 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 4‐500 versus 1500‐2000mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 2 Clinic PEF (L/min ‐ change from baseline).

2.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3 PC20 (methacholine) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 14.3

Comparison 14 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 4‐500 versus 1500‐2000mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 3 PC20 (methacholine).

Comparison 14 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 4‐500 versus 1500‐2000mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 3 PC20 (methacholine).

3.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4 PC20 AMP Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 14.4

Comparison 14 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 4‐500 versus 1500‐2000mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 4 PC20 AMP.

Comparison 14 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 4‐500 versus 1500‐2000mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 4 PC20 AMP.

4.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5 Symptoms (change from baseline) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 14.5

Comparison 14 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 4‐500 versus 1500‐2000mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 5 Symptoms (change from baseline).

Comparison 14 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 4‐500 versus 1500‐2000mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 5 Symptoms (change from baseline).

5.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Open in table viewer
Comparison 15. Parallel studies, oral steroid treated: 1000‐1500 versus 2000 mcg/d

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Change in daily dose of oral prednisolone compared to baseline (mg) Show forest plot

4

274

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.00 [‐0.45, 2.45]

Analysis 15.1

Comparison 15 Parallel studies, oral steroid treated: 1000‐1500 versus 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 1 Change in daily dose of oral prednisolone compared to baseline (mg).

Comparison 15 Parallel studies, oral steroid treated: 1000‐1500 versus 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 1 Change in daily dose of oral prednisolone compared to baseline (mg).

2 Number of patients unable to discontinue OCS completely Show forest plot

4

274

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.53 [0.88, 2.68]

Analysis 15.2

Comparison 15 Parallel studies, oral steroid treated: 1000‐1500 versus 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 2 Number of patients unable to discontinue OCS completely.

Comparison 15 Parallel studies, oral steroid treated: 1000‐1500 versus 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 2 Number of patients unable to discontinue OCS completely.

3 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres) Show forest plot

4

274

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.13 [‐0.24, ‐0.01]

Analysis 15.3

Comparison 15 Parallel studies, oral steroid treated: 1000‐1500 versus 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 3 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

Comparison 15 Parallel studies, oral steroid treated: 1000‐1500 versus 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 3 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

4 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

4

274

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐19.63 [‐34.98, ‐4.27]

Analysis 15.4

Comparison 15 Parallel studies, oral steroid treated: 1000‐1500 versus 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 4 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

Comparison 15 Parallel studies, oral steroid treated: 1000‐1500 versus 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 4 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

5 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

4

274

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐21.58 [‐35.20, ‐7.97]

Analysis 15.5

Comparison 15 Parallel studies, oral steroid treated: 1000‐1500 versus 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 5 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

Comparison 15 Parallel studies, oral steroid treated: 1000‐1500 versus 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 5 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

6 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline Show forest plot

4

274

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.15 [‐0.09, 0.39]

Analysis 15.6

Comparison 15 Parallel studies, oral steroid treated: 1000‐1500 versus 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 6 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.

Comparison 15 Parallel studies, oral steroid treated: 1000‐1500 versus 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 6 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.

7 Change in rescue beta2 agonist use compared to baseline (puffs/d) Show forest plot

4

274

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.14 [‐1.05, 0.78]

Analysis 15.7

Comparison 15 Parallel studies, oral steroid treated: 1000‐1500 versus 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 7 Change in rescue beta2 agonist use compared to baseline (puffs/d).

Comparison 15 Parallel studies, oral steroid treated: 1000‐1500 versus 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 7 Change in rescue beta2 agonist use compared to baseline (puffs/d).

8 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in overall score compared to baseline Show forest plot

3

187

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.12 [‐0.48, 0.23]

Analysis 15.8

Comparison 15 Parallel studies, oral steroid treated: 1000‐1500 versus 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 8 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in overall score compared to baseline.

Comparison 15 Parallel studies, oral steroid treated: 1000‐1500 versus 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 8 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in overall score compared to baseline.

9 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in activity limitation domain compared to baseline Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 15.9

Comparison 15 Parallel studies, oral steroid treated: 1000‐1500 versus 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 9 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in activity limitation domain compared to baseline.

Comparison 15 Parallel studies, oral steroid treated: 1000‐1500 versus 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 9 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in activity limitation domain compared to baseline.

10 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in symptom domain compared to baseline Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 15.10

Comparison 15 Parallel studies, oral steroid treated: 1000‐1500 versus 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 10 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in symptom domain compared to baseline.

Comparison 15 Parallel studies, oral steroid treated: 1000‐1500 versus 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 10 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in symptom domain compared to baseline.

11 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in emotional function domain compared to baseline Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 15.11

Comparison 15 Parallel studies, oral steroid treated: 1000‐1500 versus 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 11 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in emotional function domain compared to baseline.

Comparison 15 Parallel studies, oral steroid treated: 1000‐1500 versus 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 11 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in emotional function domain compared to baseline.

12 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in environmental exposure domain compared to baseline Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 15.12

Comparison 15 Parallel studies, oral steroid treated: 1000‐1500 versus 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 12 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in environmental exposure domain compared to baseline.

Comparison 15 Parallel studies, oral steroid treated: 1000‐1500 versus 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 12 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in environmental exposure domain compared to baseline.

13 Sore throat (No. of patients) Show forest plot

2

141

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.70 [0.15, 3.18]

Analysis 15.13

Comparison 15 Parallel studies, oral steroid treated: 1000‐1500 versus 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 13 Sore throat (No. of patients).

Comparison 15 Parallel studies, oral steroid treated: 1000‐1500 versus 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 13 Sore throat (No. of patients).

14 Hoarseness/dysphonia (No. of patients) Show forest plot

2

141

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.92 [0.28, 2.99]

Analysis 15.14

Comparison 15 Parallel studies, oral steroid treated: 1000‐1500 versus 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 14 Hoarseness/dysphonia (No. of patients).

Comparison 15 Parallel studies, oral steroid treated: 1000‐1500 versus 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 14 Hoarseness/dysphonia (No. of patients).

15 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

2

141

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.96 [0.41, 2.24]

Analysis 15.15

Comparison 15 Parallel studies, oral steroid treated: 1000‐1500 versus 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 15 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).

Comparison 15 Parallel studies, oral steroid treated: 1000‐1500 versus 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 15 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).

Open in table viewer
Comparison 16. Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 1000 mcg (all ages)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 FEV1 Show forest plot

1

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 16.1

Comparison 16 Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 1000 mcg (all ages), Outcome 1 FEV1.

Comparison 16 Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 1000 mcg (all ages), Outcome 1 FEV1.

2 PEF Show forest plot

1

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 16.2

Comparison 16 Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 1000 mcg (all ages), Outcome 2 PEF.

Comparison 16 Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 1000 mcg (all ages), Outcome 2 PEF.

Methodological quality summary: review authors' judgements about each methodological quality item for each included study.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Methodological quality summary: review authors' judgements about each methodological quality item for each included study.

Comparison 1 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 100 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 100 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

Comparison 1 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 100 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 2 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 100 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 2 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

Comparison 1 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 100 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 3 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 100 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 3 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

Comparison 1 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 100 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 4 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 100 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 4 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.

Comparison 1 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 100 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 5 Change in number of night‐time awakenings/week compared to baseline.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 100 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 5 Change in number of night‐time awakenings/week compared to baseline.

Comparison 1 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 100 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 6 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 100 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 6 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).

Comparison 1 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 100 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 7 Number of patients withdrawn due to lack of efficacy.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.7

Comparison 1 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 100 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 7 Number of patients withdrawn due to lack of efficacy.

Comparison 2 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

Comparison 2 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 2 Change in FVC compared to baseline (litres).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 2 Change in FVC compared to baseline (litres).

Comparison 2 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 3 Change in FEF25‐75 compared to baseline (L/second).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.3

Comparison 2 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 3 Change in FEF25‐75 compared to baseline (L/second).

Comparison 2 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 4 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.4

Comparison 2 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 4 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

Comparison 2 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 5 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.5

Comparison 2 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 5 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

Comparison 2 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 6 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.6

Comparison 2 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 6 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.

Comparison 2 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 7 Change in number of night‐time awakenings/week compared to baseline.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.7

Comparison 2 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 7 Change in number of night‐time awakenings/week compared to baseline.

Comparison 2 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 8 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.8

Comparison 2 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 8 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).

Comparison 2 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 9 Number of patients withdrawn due to lack of efficacy.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.9

Comparison 2 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 9 Number of patients withdrawn due to lack of efficacy.

Comparison 2 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 10 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.10

Comparison 2 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 10 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).

Comparison 2 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 11 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.11

Comparison 2 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 11 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).

Comparison 2 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 12 Physician global rated efficacy: ineffective.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.12

Comparison 2 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 12 Physician global rated efficacy: ineffective.

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 2 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.2

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 2 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 3 FEV1 (% predicted).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.3

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 3 FEV1 (% predicted).

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 4 FEV1 (% predicted).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.4

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 4 FEV1 (% predicted).

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 5 FEV1 Litres.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.5

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 5 FEV1 Litres.

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 6 PEF (L/min).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.6

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 6 PEF (L/min).

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 7 Change in clinic PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.7

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 7 Change in clinic PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 8 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.8

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 8 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 9 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.9

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 9 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 10 Rescue medication usage.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.10

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 10 Rescue medication usage.

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 11 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.11

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 11 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 12 Symptom scores.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.12

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 12 Symptom scores.

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 13 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.13

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 13 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 14 Change in number of night‐time awakenings/week compared to baseline.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.14

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 14 Change in number of night‐time awakenings/week compared to baseline.

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 15 Percentage of symptom‐free days.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.15

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 15 Percentage of symptom‐free days.

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 16 Change in night‐time awakening score compared to baseline.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.16

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 16 Change in night‐time awakening score compared to baseline.

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 17 HRQOL: Functional Status IIR questionaire (short version).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.17

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 17 HRQOL: Functional Status IIR questionaire (short version).

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 18 HRQOL: Sleep Scale Children questionnaire.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.18

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 18 HRQOL: Sleep Scale Children questionnaire.

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 19 HRQOL: Quality of Life of Parents of Asthmatic Children questionnaire, burden dimension.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.19

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 19 HRQOL: Quality of Life of Parents of Asthmatic Children questionnaire, burden dimension.

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 20 HRQOL: Quality of Life of Parents of Asthmatic Children questionnaire, subjective norms dimension.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.20

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 20 HRQOL: Quality of Life of Parents of Asthmatic Children questionnaire, subjective norms dimension.

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 21 HRQOL: Quality of Life of Parents of Asthmatic Children questionnaire, subjective norms dimension.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.21

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 21 HRQOL: Quality of Life of Parents of Asthmatic Children questionnaire, subjective norms dimension.

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 22 Physician global rated efficacy: ineffective.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.22

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 22 Physician global rated efficacy: ineffective.

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 23 Withdrawal due to asthma exacerbation (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.23

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 23 Withdrawal due to asthma exacerbation (No. of patients).

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 24 Withdrawals due to adverse events.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.24

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 24 Withdrawals due to adverse events.

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 25 Number of patients withdrawn due to lack of efficacy.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.25

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 25 Number of patients withdrawn due to lack of efficacy.

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 26 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.26

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 26 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 27 Headaches.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.27

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 27 Headaches.

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 28 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.28

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 28 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 29 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.29

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 29 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 30 Urinary free cortisol excretion (mcg/24 hours).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.30

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 30 Urinary free cortisol excretion (mcg/24 hours).

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 31 Morning plasma cortisol (mcg/dL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.31

Comparison 3 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 31 Morning plasma cortisol (mcg/dL).

Comparison 4 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (subgroups), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on study duration(litres) ‐ children.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.1

Comparison 4 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (subgroups), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on study duration(litres) ‐ children.

Comparison 4 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (subgroups), Outcome 2 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on study duration (litres) ‐ adults.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.2

Comparison 4 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (subgroups), Outcome 2 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on study duration (litres) ‐ adults.

Comparison 4 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (subgroups), Outcome 3 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres) based on delivery devices ‐ children.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.3

Comparison 4 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (subgroups), Outcome 3 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres) based on delivery devices ‐ children.

Comparison 4 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (subgroups), Outcome 4 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on delivery devices (litres) ‐ adults.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.4

Comparison 4 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (subgroups), Outcome 4 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on delivery devices (litres) ‐ adults.

Comparison 4 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (subgroups), Outcome 5 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on degrees of severity (litres) ‐ children.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.5

Comparison 4 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (subgroups), Outcome 5 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on degrees of severity (litres) ‐ children.

Comparison 4 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (subgroups), Outcome 6 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on degrees of severity (litres) ‐ adults.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.6

Comparison 4 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (subgroups), Outcome 6 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on degrees of severity (litres) ‐ adults.

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 1 FEV1 (% predicted).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.1

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 1 FEV1 (% predicted).

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 2 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.2

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 2 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 3 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres ‐ imputed estimates).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.3

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 3 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres ‐ imputed estimates).

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 4 Change in FVC compared to baseline (litres).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.4

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 4 Change in FVC compared to baseline (litres).

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 5 Change in FEF25‐75 compared to baseline (L/second).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.5

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 5 Change in FEF25‐75 compared to baseline (L/second).

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 6 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min ‐ imputed/estimated values).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.6

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 6 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min ‐ imputed/estimated values).

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 7 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.7

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 7 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 8 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.8

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 8 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 9 PC20.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.9

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 9 PC20.

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 10 PD20.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.10

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 10 PD20.

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 11 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.11

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 11 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 12 Change in number of night‐time awakenings/week compared to baseline.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.12

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 12 Change in number of night‐time awakenings/week compared to baseline.

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 13 Change in % nights without waking.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.13

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 13 Change in % nights without waking.

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 14 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.14

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 14 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 15 Percentage of symptom‐free days.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.15

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 15 Percentage of symptom‐free days.

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 17 Number of patients withdrawn due to lack of efficacy.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.17

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 17 Number of patients withdrawn due to lack of efficacy.

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 18 Exacerbations requiring oral steroids.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.18

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 18 Exacerbations requiring oral steroids.

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 19 Exacerbations requiring hospitalisation.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.19

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 19 Exacerbations requiring hospitalisation.

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 20 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.20

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 20 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 21 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.21

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 21 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 22 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.22

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 22 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 23 Withdrawals due to adverse events.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.23

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 23 Withdrawals due to adverse events.

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 24 No. patients with </=18 mcg/dL poststimulation cortisol.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.24

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 24 No. patients with </=18 mcg/dL poststimulation cortisol.

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 25 AUC serum cortisol.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.25

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 25 AUC serum cortisol.

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 26 Change in peak plasma cortisol expression.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.26

Comparison 5 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 26 Change in peak plasma cortisol expression.

Comparison 6 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (subgroups), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on study duration (litres) ‐ adults.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.1

Comparison 6 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (subgroups), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on study duration (litres) ‐ adults.

Comparison 6 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (subgroups), Outcome 2 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on delivery devices (litres) ‐ adults.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.2

Comparison 6 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (subgroups), Outcome 2 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on delivery devices (litres) ‐ adults.

Comparison 6 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (subgroups), Outcome 3 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on degrees of severity (litres) ‐ adults.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.3

Comparison 6 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (subgroups), Outcome 3 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on degrees of severity (litres) ‐ adults.

Comparison 7 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.1

Comparison 7 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

Comparison 7 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 2 FEV1 (% predicted).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.2

Comparison 7 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 2 FEV1 (% predicted).

Comparison 7 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 3 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.3

Comparison 7 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 3 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

Comparison 7 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 4 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.4

Comparison 7 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 4 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

Comparison 7 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 5 Percentage of symptom‐free days.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.5

Comparison 7 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 5 Percentage of symptom‐free days.

Comparison 7 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 6 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.6

Comparison 7 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 6 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.

Comparison 7 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 7 Change in number of night‐time awakenings/week compared to baseline.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.7

Comparison 7 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 7 Change in number of night‐time awakenings/week compared to baseline.

Comparison 7 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 8 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.8

Comparison 7 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 8 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).

Comparison 7 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 9 Physician global rated efficacy: ineffective.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.9

Comparison 7 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 9 Physician global rated efficacy: ineffective.

Comparison 7 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 10 Number of patients withdrawn due to lack of efficacy.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.10

Comparison 7 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 10 Number of patients withdrawn due to lack of efficacy.

Comparison 7 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 11 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.11

Comparison 7 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 11 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).

Comparison 7 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 12 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.12

Comparison 7 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 12 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).

Comparison 7 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 13 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.13

Comparison 7 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 13 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).

Comparison 7 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 14 Plasma Cortisol (AUC).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.14

Comparison 7 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 14 Plasma Cortisol (AUC).

Comparison 7 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 15 Clinic PEF (L/min ‐ change from baseline).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.15

Comparison 7 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 15 Clinic PEF (L/min ‐ change from baseline).

Comparison 8 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (subgroups), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on study duration (litres) ‐ adults.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 8.1

Comparison 8 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (subgroups), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on study duration (litres) ‐ adults.

Comparison 8 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (subgroups), Outcome 2 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on delivery devices (litres) ‐ adults.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 8.2

Comparison 8 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (subgroups), Outcome 2 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on delivery devices (litres) ‐ adults.

Comparison 8 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (subgroups), Outcome 3 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on degrees of severity (litres) ‐ adults.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 8.3

Comparison 8 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (subgroups), Outcome 3 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on degrees of severity (litres) ‐ adults.

Comparison 9 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 400‐500 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 1 FEV1 (Change from baseline ‐ litres).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.1

Comparison 9 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 400‐500 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 1 FEV1 (Change from baseline ‐ litres).

Comparison 9 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 400‐500 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 2 Change in morning PEF (L/min).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.2

Comparison 9 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 400‐500 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 2 Change in morning PEF (L/min).

Comparison 9 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 400‐500 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 3 Change in evening PEF (L/min).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.3

Comparison 9 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 400‐500 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 3 Change in evening PEF (L/min).

Comparison 9 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 400‐500 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 4 Change in rescue medication (puffs/d).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.4

Comparison 9 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 400‐500 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 4 Change in rescue medication (puffs/d).

Comparison 9 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 400‐500 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 6 Change in daily symptoms compared with baseline.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.6

Comparison 9 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 400‐500 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 6 Change in daily symptoms compared with baseline.

Comparison 9 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 400‐500 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 8 Exacerbations requiring hospitalisation.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.8

Comparison 9 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 400‐500 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 8 Exacerbations requiring hospitalisation.

Comparison 9 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 400‐500 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 9 Exacerbations requiring OCS treatment.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.9

Comparison 9 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 400‐500 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 9 Exacerbations requiring OCS treatment.

Comparison 9 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 400‐500 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 10 Withdrawals (total).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.10

Comparison 9 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 400‐500 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 10 Withdrawals (total).

Comparison 9 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 400‐500 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 11 Withdrawals (adverse events).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.11

Comparison 9 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 400‐500 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 11 Withdrawals (adverse events).

Comparison 9 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 400‐500 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 12 Withdrawals (lack of efficacy).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.12

Comparison 9 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 400‐500 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 12 Withdrawals (lack of efficacy).

Comparison 10 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 400‐500 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (subgroups), Outcome 1 Change from baseline in FEV1 based on study duration (litres) ‐ adults.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 10.1

Comparison 10 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 400‐500 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (subgroups), Outcome 1 Change from baseline in FEV1 based on study duration (litres) ‐ adults.

Comparison 10 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 400‐500 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (subgroups), Outcome 2 Change from baseline in FEV1 based on delivery devices (litres) ‐ adults.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 10.2

Comparison 10 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 400‐500 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (subgroups), Outcome 2 Change from baseline in FEV1 based on delivery devices (litres) ‐ adults.

Comparison 10 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 400‐500 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (subgroups), Outcome 3 Change from baseline in FEV1 based on degree of severity (litres) ‐ adults.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 10.3

Comparison 10 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 400‐500 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (subgroups), Outcome 3 Change from baseline in FEV1 based on degree of severity (litres) ‐ adults.

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 11.1

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 2 FEV1 (% predicted).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 11.2

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 2 FEV1 (% predicted).

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 3 FEV1 (Litres).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 11.3

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 3 FEV1 (Litres).

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 4 Change in FVC compared to baseline (litres).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 11.4

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 4 Change in FVC compared to baseline (litres).

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 5 FEF25‐75.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 11.5

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 5 FEF25‐75.

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 6 Change in FEF25‐75 compared to baseline (L/second).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 11.6

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 6 Change in FEF25‐75 compared to baseline (L/second).

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 7 am PEF (Litres/min).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 11.7

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 7 am PEF (Litres/min).

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 8 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 11.8

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 8 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 9 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 11.9

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 9 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 10 Physician global rated efficacy: ineffective.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 11.10

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 10 Physician global rated efficacy: ineffective.

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 11 Symptoms.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 11.11

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 11 Symptoms.

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 12 Percentage of symptom‐free days.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 11.12

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 12 Percentage of symptom‐free days.

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 13 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 11.13

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 13 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 14 Change in number of night‐time awakenings/week compared to baseline.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 11.14

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 14 Change in number of night‐time awakenings/week compared to baseline.

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 15 Rescue medication usage.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 11.15

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 15 Rescue medication usage.

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 16 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 11.16

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 16 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 17 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 11.17

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 17 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 18 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 11.18

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 18 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 19 Withdrawals (total).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 11.19

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 19 Withdrawals (total).

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 20 Number of patients withdrawn due to lack of efficacy.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 11.20

Comparison 11 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 20 Number of patients withdrawn due to lack of efficacy.

Comparison 12 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 12.1

Comparison 12 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

Comparison 12 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 2 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (%).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 12.2

Comparison 12 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 2 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (%).

Comparison 12 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 3 Change in FEV1 % predicted.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 12.3

Comparison 12 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 3 Change in FEV1 % predicted.

Comparison 12 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 4 FEV1 (% predicted).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 12.4

Comparison 12 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 4 FEV1 (% predicted).

Comparison 12 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 5 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 12.5

Comparison 12 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 5 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

Comparison 12 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 6 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 12.6

Comparison 12 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 6 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

Comparison 12 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 7 Change in FVC compared to baseline (litres).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 12.7

Comparison 12 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 7 Change in FVC compared to baseline (litres).

Comparison 12 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 8 Change in FEF25‐75 compared to baseline (L/second).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 12.8

Comparison 12 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 8 Change in FEF25‐75 compared to baseline (L/second).

Comparison 12 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 9 PD20.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 12.9

Comparison 12 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 9 PD20.

Comparison 12 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 10 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 12.10

Comparison 12 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 10 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.

Comparison 12 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 11 Change in number of night‐time awakenings/week compared to baseline.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 12.11

Comparison 12 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 11 Change in number of night‐time awakenings/week compared to baseline.

Comparison 12 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 12 Physician global rated efficacy: ineffective.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 12.12

Comparison 12 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 12 Physician global rated efficacy: ineffective.

Comparison 12 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 13 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 12.13

Comparison 12 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 13 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d).

Comparison 12 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 14 Number of patients withdrawn due to lack of efficacy.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 12.14

Comparison 12 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 14 Number of patients withdrawn due to lack of efficacy.

Comparison 12 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 15 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 12.15

Comparison 12 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 15 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).

Comparison 12 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 16 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 12.16

Comparison 12 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 16 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients).

Comparison 12 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 17 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 12.17

Comparison 12 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 17 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients).

Comparison 12 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 18 Change in peak plasma cortisol compared to baseline (mcg/dL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 12.18

Comparison 12 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 18 Change in peak plasma cortisol compared to baseline (mcg/dL).

Comparison 12 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 19 Change in morning plasma cortisol compared to baseline (mcg/dL).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 12.19

Comparison 12 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 19 Change in morning plasma cortisol compared to baseline (mcg/dL).

Comparison 13 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (subgroups), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on study duration (litres) ‐ adults.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 13.1

Comparison 13 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (subgroups), Outcome 1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on study duration (litres) ‐ adults.

Comparison 13 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (subgroups), Outcome 2 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on delivery devices (litres) ‐ adults.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 13.2

Comparison 13 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (subgroups), Outcome 2 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on delivery devices (litres) ‐ adults.

Comparison 13 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (subgroups), Outcome 3 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on degrees of severity (litres) ‐ adults.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 13.3

Comparison 13 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (subgroups), Outcome 3 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on degrees of severity (litres) ‐ adults.

Comparison 14 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 4‐500 versus 1500‐2000mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 1 FEV1 (Change from baseline ‐ litres).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 14.1

Comparison 14 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 4‐500 versus 1500‐2000mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 1 FEV1 (Change from baseline ‐ litres).

Comparison 14 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 4‐500 versus 1500‐2000mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 2 Clinic PEF (L/min ‐ change from baseline).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 14.2

Comparison 14 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 4‐500 versus 1500‐2000mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 2 Clinic PEF (L/min ‐ change from baseline).

Comparison 14 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 4‐500 versus 1500‐2000mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 3 PC20 (methacholine).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 14.3

Comparison 14 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 4‐500 versus 1500‐2000mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 3 PC20 (methacholine).

Comparison 14 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 4‐500 versus 1500‐2000mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 4 PC20 AMP.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 14.4

Comparison 14 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 4‐500 versus 1500‐2000mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 4 PC20 AMP.

Comparison 14 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 4‐500 versus 1500‐2000mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 5 Symptoms (change from baseline).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 14.5

Comparison 14 Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 4‐500 versus 1500‐2000mcg/d (all ages), Outcome 5 Symptoms (change from baseline).

Comparison 15 Parallel studies, oral steroid treated: 1000‐1500 versus 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 1 Change in daily dose of oral prednisolone compared to baseline (mg).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 15.1

Comparison 15 Parallel studies, oral steroid treated: 1000‐1500 versus 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 1 Change in daily dose of oral prednisolone compared to baseline (mg).

Comparison 15 Parallel studies, oral steroid treated: 1000‐1500 versus 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 2 Number of patients unable to discontinue OCS completely.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 15.2

Comparison 15 Parallel studies, oral steroid treated: 1000‐1500 versus 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 2 Number of patients unable to discontinue OCS completely.

Comparison 15 Parallel studies, oral steroid treated: 1000‐1500 versus 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 3 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 15.3

Comparison 15 Parallel studies, oral steroid treated: 1000‐1500 versus 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 3 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres).

Comparison 15 Parallel studies, oral steroid treated: 1000‐1500 versus 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 4 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 15.4

Comparison 15 Parallel studies, oral steroid treated: 1000‐1500 versus 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 4 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

Comparison 15 Parallel studies, oral steroid treated: 1000‐1500 versus 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 5 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 15.5

Comparison 15 Parallel studies, oral steroid treated: 1000‐1500 versus 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 5 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min).

Comparison 15 Parallel studies, oral steroid treated: 1000‐1500 versus 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 6 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 15.6

Comparison 15 Parallel studies, oral steroid treated: 1000‐1500 versus 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 6 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline.

Comparison 15 Parallel studies, oral steroid treated: 1000‐1500 versus 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 7 Change in rescue beta2 agonist use compared to baseline (puffs/d).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 15.7

Comparison 15 Parallel studies, oral steroid treated: 1000‐1500 versus 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 7 Change in rescue beta2 agonist use compared to baseline (puffs/d).

Comparison 15 Parallel studies, oral steroid treated: 1000‐1500 versus 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 8 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in overall score compared to baseline.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 15.8

Comparison 15 Parallel studies, oral steroid treated: 1000‐1500 versus 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 8 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in overall score compared to baseline.

Comparison 15 Parallel studies, oral steroid treated: 1000‐1500 versus 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 9 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in activity limitation domain compared to baseline.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 15.9

Comparison 15 Parallel studies, oral steroid treated: 1000‐1500 versus 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 9 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in activity limitation domain compared to baseline.

Comparison 15 Parallel studies, oral steroid treated: 1000‐1500 versus 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 10 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in symptom domain compared to baseline.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 15.10

Comparison 15 Parallel studies, oral steroid treated: 1000‐1500 versus 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 10 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in symptom domain compared to baseline.

Comparison 15 Parallel studies, oral steroid treated: 1000‐1500 versus 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 11 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in emotional function domain compared to baseline.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 15.11

Comparison 15 Parallel studies, oral steroid treated: 1000‐1500 versus 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 11 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in emotional function domain compared to baseline.

Comparison 15 Parallel studies, oral steroid treated: 1000‐1500 versus 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 12 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in environmental exposure domain compared to baseline.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 15.12

Comparison 15 Parallel studies, oral steroid treated: 1000‐1500 versus 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 12 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in environmental exposure domain compared to baseline.

Comparison 15 Parallel studies, oral steroid treated: 1000‐1500 versus 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 13 Sore throat (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 15.13

Comparison 15 Parallel studies, oral steroid treated: 1000‐1500 versus 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 13 Sore throat (No. of patients).

Comparison 15 Parallel studies, oral steroid treated: 1000‐1500 versus 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 14 Hoarseness/dysphonia (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 15.14

Comparison 15 Parallel studies, oral steroid treated: 1000‐1500 versus 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 14 Hoarseness/dysphonia (No. of patients).

Comparison 15 Parallel studies, oral steroid treated: 1000‐1500 versus 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 15 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 15.15

Comparison 15 Parallel studies, oral steroid treated: 1000‐1500 versus 2000 mcg/d, Outcome 15 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients).

Comparison 16 Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 1000 mcg (all ages), Outcome 1 FEV1.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 16.1

Comparison 16 Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 1000 mcg (all ages), Outcome 1 FEV1.

Comparison 16 Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 1000 mcg (all ages), Outcome 2 PEF.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 16.2

Comparison 16 Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 1000 mcg (all ages), Outcome 2 PEF.

Table 2. Data not included in the meta‐analysis

Study ID

Data

Allen 2000

Steroid consumption
Side effects

Unclear reporting (no response from trialists)

Ayres 1995

Symptom free days and nights
Rescue beta2 agonist free days and nights
Daytime and night‐time symptom scores
Above outcomes analysed by investigators using non‐parametric statistics

Change in FEV1 compared to baseline
Change in FVC compared to baseline
Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline
Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline
Change in diurnal variability in PEFR compared to baseline
Change in clinic PEFR compared to baseline
No SD values available for above outcomes

Morning plasma cortisol
Data log transformed and reported using geometric means by investigators: log transformed values not available

Boner 1999

Methacholine BHR (PC20 FEV1)
Log transformed data not available

FEV1
No SD values available

Overnight urinary cortisol
No numerical data available

Bukovskis 2002

FEV1 change from baseline

Unclear reporting (no response from trialists)

Chervinsky 1994

Change in urinary free cortisol compared to baseline
Change in urinary 17‐hydroxy steroids compared to baseline
Change in morning plasma cortisol compared to baseline
Change in plasma cortisol 60 min post co‐syntropin
No SD values available for above outcomes

Chetta 2002

FEV1

Unclear reporting (no response from trialists)

Dahl 1993

Morning plasma cortisol
Plasma cortisol 30 min post 250 mcg ACTH
Diurnal variation in PEFR
FVC
Daily beta2 agonist use (puffs/day)
No SD values available for above outcomes

Derom 1999

Cortisol suppression

Unclear reporting (no response from trialists)

Derom 2001

Cortisol suppression
PC20

Unclear reporting (no response from trialists)

Gershman 2000

PC20
ECP

Data reported as medians

Hofstra 2000

PD20
No SDs presented.

Ind 2003

Medication usage
Symptoms
Data presented as medians

Katz 1998

Change in FEV1 compared to baseline
Change in FVC compared to baseline
Change in FEF25‐75 compared to baseline
Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline
Change in night‐time awakening score compared to baseline
No SD values available for above outcomes

Meijer 1999

FEV1
PEF
Symptoms
Medication usage
Cortisol

Data presented as medians

Nieto 2001

PC20

Unclear reporting (no response from trialists)

Noonan 1998

Change in log e methacholine bronchial responsiveness PD20 FEV1
Error bars plotted on graphical display of results, but unclear whether these represent SD or SEM values

Pauwels 2002

Cortisol suppression
PC20

Unclear reporting (no response from trialists)

Pearlman 1997

Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline
Medical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF‐36A)
Living with asthma questionnaire
No SD values available for above outcomes

Morning serum cortisol
No numerical data available for above outcome

Physician rated global assessment of efficacy
Data not presented in a form suitable for meta‐analysis

SAM40012

% symptom free days
rescue medication usage

Data reported as medians.

Verona 2003

Medication usage
Symptoms

Data reported as medians

Wallin 2003

am PEF/pm PEF

Data reported as medians

Wasserman 1996

Physician‐rated global assessment of effectiveness
Data not presented in a form suitable for meta‐analysis

Wolfe 1996

Change FEV1 compared to baseline
No SD values available for above outcome

Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline
Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline
Daily wheeze, cough, shortness of breath scores
Daily beta2 agonist use
Morning plasma cortisol
No numerical data available for above outcomes

Figuras y tablas -
Table 2. Data not included in the meta‐analysis
Table 3. Methods of imputations and estimates

Outcome

WMD/GIV

Study

Method

07:03

WMD

Pinnas 2005

Published means. SDs based on other studies.

07:07

GIV

Pinnas 2005

Published means. SDs based on other studies.

07:07

GIV

Wolfe 1996

Published P values (versus placebo), assumed same SEM between two FP groups.

20:01

WMD

Pinnas 2005

Published means. SDs based on other studies.

20:03

WMD

Ind 2003; Pinnas 2005

Published means. SDs based on other studies.

Figuras y tablas -
Table 3. Methods of imputations and estimates
Table 4. Search History Detail

Date

N included/excluded

All Years searching to March 1999

Initial version of the review (All Years searching to March 1999): 6494 citations retrieved, 2162 unique citations imported to Inhaled Steroid Register. From this a fluticasone register was created consisting of 258 citations. 180 excluded on basis of abstract: 150 not RCT; 30 not chronic asthma in humans; 78 papers retrieved in full text form; 57 excluded on basis of full paper: 6 not RCT; 1 infants; 3 delivery device comparison; 1 treatment period < 1 week; 46 not a comparison of 2 or more doses of FP; 21 publications meeting inclusion criteria; 16 unique studies meeting inclusion criteria

One study (Raphael 1999) was identified by Glaxo Wellcome. This study was published after the date of the final electronic search (March 1999). Three studies (Boner 1999, Hofstra 2000, Ind 2003) were identified as a result of searching respiratory society meeting abstracts.

Update (March 1999‐January 2005)

From hand searching the updated inhaled steroids search results (additional 1301 references), a 'fluticasone' register was created consisting of 196 citations (121 references excluded from abstracts as irrelevant comparisons). Forty‐six references pertaining to 34 studies were retrieved in full for this review. One study reported findings from two data‐sets and these studies have been given two identifiers (Sorkness 1999; Sorkness 1999a). We excluded 11 studies for the following reasons: Wrong comparator (9), outcomes not relevant (2) and varying dose of FP (1).

24 new studies met the inclusion criteria for the review (Allen 2000; Bukovskis 2002; Casale 2001; Chetta 2002; Derom 1999; Derom 2001; Falcoz 2000; Gershman 2000; Giannini 2003; Kemp 2004; Li 1999; Meijer 1999; Nathan 2000; Nielsen 2002; Nieto 2001; O'Sullivan 2002; Pauwels 2002; Pearlman 1999; Pearlman 2002; SAM40012; Sorkness 1999; Sorkness 1999a; Verona 2003; Wallin 2003).

Data for two studies previously included as abstracts were published in full text form (Hofstra 2000; Ind 2003). One study was identified from an online repository of unpublished clinical trials (SAM40012).

January 2005‐January 2006

References identified: 411
Number assessed for further scrutiny: 55

Figuras y tablas -
Table 4. Search History Detail
Table 5. Asthma severity: characteristics of included patients at baseline

Study ID

FEV1: incl. criteria

Basline FEV1

Symptom frequency

OCS treatment

ICS treatment

Author opinion

Overall estimation

Agertoft 1997

Not stated

Not stated

No

No

Not stated

Mild

Mild

Allen 1998

>60

88‐89%

Not stated

No

Approx. 50% patients ICS naive at baseline, 50% previous regular ICS use

Mild to moderate

Mild to moderate

Allen 2000

Not stated

61%

Not stated

Yes (non‐OCS dependents excluded)

Not stated

Severe

Severe

Ayres 1995

Not stated

Mean baseline morning PEFR 73‐77 (% predicted)

Need for 2 or more doses beta2 agonist on 2 out of 7 days of run in period

Proportion of patients using OCS (<10 mg/d)

Yes: BDP 1‐2 mg/d or BUD 0.8‐1.6 mg/d

moderate to severe

Moderate to severe

Boner 1999

Not stated

Not stated

Not stated

No

Not stated

Not stated

Unclear

Bukovkis 2002

Not stated

Not stated

Not stated

Not stated

Not stated

Not stated

Unclear

Casale 2001

>/=65%

3‐3.2 L

Not stated

No

Not stated

Mild to moderate

Mild to moderate

Chervinsky 1994

60‐90

71‐73%

Not stated

No

Yes: at least 1 month regular treatment with BDP prior to study

Mild to moderate

Mild to moderate

Chetta 2002

>70%

100‐110%

Well documented history of asthma

No

Not stated

Mild to moderate

Mild

Dahl 1993

Not stated

73‐75%

daytime wheezing or night‐time symptoms on at least 4 days of 7 day run‐in period or PEFR variability 20% or greater

No

Yes: BDP 1000 mcg/d or less

Moderate

Moderate

Derom 1999

>/=40%

80%

Not stated

No

Not within 6 months

Not stated

Mild

Derom 2001

Not stated

Not stated

Not stated

Not stated

Not stated

Unclear

Unclear

Falcoz 2000

50‐80%

Not stated

Not stated

Not stated

Not stated

Mild‐to‐moderate

Unclear

FAP30001

>/=45%

74‐5%

Not stated

No

Yes

Not stated

Moderate

FLIC15

>/=60% predicted

Not stated

Not stated

No

No

Mild to moderate

Mild

FLIP01/a

Not reported

Not reported

Not reported

No

Yes

Not reported

Moderate

FLIP39

Not reported

Not reported

Perennial symptoms requiring ICS

No

Yes ‐ up to 400mcg/d

Not stated

Moderate

FLTA3014

50‐85%

Not reported

Not reported

No

Yes

Not stated

Unclear

FLTA3020/a

60‐90%

Not reported

Not reported

No

No (low dose ceased 30 days prior to study entry)

Not stated

Mild to moderate

FLTA3022/a

40‐85% predicted

Not reported

Not stated

Yes

Yes

Not stated

Severe

FLTA4030

50‐80%

Not stated

Stable during 7 day run‐in, controlled with SABA alone

No

No

Not stated

Mild to moderate

Galant 1996

45‐75

60‐62%

> 8 puffs/d beta2 agonist or 2‐4 night‐time awakenings in week run‐in

No

No

Mild to moderate

Moderate

Gershman 2000

Not stated

66‐69%

Not stated

Not stated

Not stated

Not stated

Unclear

Giannini 2003

Not stated

3.23 L

Requirement for beta‐agonist treatment during run‐in

Not stated

Not stated

Moderate

Mild to moderate

Hofstra 2000

Not stated

96.6‐93.2%

Not stated

No

No

Not stated

Unclear

Ind 2003

FEV1 not stipulated at inclusion

No details

Symptomatic despite ICS treatment. History of exacerbations

No

Yes: 1000‐1600 mcg/d of BDP or BUD

Moderate‐severe

Moderate‐severe

Katz 1998

Not stated

PEFR 75 (% predicted) or less

Asthma symptoms on at least 4 out of 10 days of run in period or at least one night‐time awakening in 10 days or 4 or puffs beta2 agonist on at least 4 days

No

No

Not stated

Moderate

Kemp 2004

50‐100% predicted

82‐85% predicted

Mild stable asthma

No

No

Mild

Mild

Lawrence 1997

50‐80

65‐68%

"Mean beta2 agonist use 3.2 ‐ 4.2 puffs/d "

No

Yes: 3 months treatment or longer prior to study

Not stated

Moderate

Li 1999

FEV1 </=50% predicted

82.5‐88.2%

Not stated

No

No

Not stated

Mild

Lumry 2006

45‐80%

65.3‐65.5

Not stated

No

Yes

Not stated

Moderate

Meijer 1999

Not stipulated

79‐81%

Participants who exacerbated needing OCS during run‐in were excluded

No

Yes ‐ treatment tapered prior to randomisation

Mild‐moderate

Mild to moderate

Nathan 2000

45‐75% predicted

63.3‐64.3

Not stated

No

Yes

Moderate

Moderate

Nelson 1999

40‐80

60‐62%

Not stated

Yes

Almost 100% of patients receiving ICS

Severe

Severe

Nieto 2001

Not stated

Not stated

Not stated

Not stated

Not stated

Not stated

Unclear

Noonan 1998

60‐85

73‐76%

"No more than 12 puffs/d beta2 agonist and no more than 3 nights with awakening due to asthma"

No

No

Mild to moderate

Moderate

Noonan 1995

40‐80

56‐57.4%

Requirement for rescue beta2 agonist for 2 weeks prior to study due to symptoms

Yes

87% of patients receiving ICS

Severe

Severe

O'Sullivan 2002

>/=60%

79‐86%

Not stated

No

No

Mild‐moderate

Mild to moderate

Pauwels 2002

Not stated

Not stated

Not stated

Not stated

Not stated

Not stated

Unclear

Pearlman 1997

50‐80

66‐67%

"Mean beta2 agonist use 3.4‐4.1 puffs/dNo more than 12 puffs/d beta2 agonist and no more than 2 nights with awakening due to asthma symptoms in last 7 days"

No

Yes: at least 3 months

Moderate

Moderate

Pearlman 1999

50‐80%

65‐69%

Not stated

No

No

Mild‐moderate

Mild to moderate

Peden 1998

50‐85

72‐73%

"No more than 12 puffs/d beta2 agonist and no more than 3 nights with awakening due to asthmaMean awakenings per night due to asthma 0.05 to 0.09Mean beta2 agonist use 1.4 to 2.0 puffs/d"

No

Some patients: amount and type of ICS not stated

Not stated

Moderate

Pinnas 2005

45‐80

67%

'during the week before
randomization, patients could not have had more than
3 days in which more than 12 inhalations of albuterol were
used, more than 3 nights with awakenings due to asthma requiring
albuterol, or asthma exacerbations requiring systemic
corticosteroids and/or hospitalization.'

No

No

Moderate to severe

Moderate

Raphael 1999

45‐65

64.7‐65.7%

> 8 puffs/week beta 2 agonist or diurnal variability in PEFR > 20% during run‐in if FEV > 65‐80 (% predicted)

No

Yes: BDP or TA 8‐12 puffs/d

mild/moderate and severe

mild/moderate and severe

SAM40012

Not stated

Not stated

Symptom score greater than 2 on at least 3 of previous 7 days

Not stated

Yes

Not stated

Moderate

Sheffer 1996

45‐75

62‐64%

"During 7 day run‐in:> 2 night‐time awakenings due to asthma in last 7 days20% or greater PEFR diurnal variability at least one day in which 8 puffs beta2 agonist used "

No

No

Mild to moderate

Moderate

Sorkness 1999a

>/=50%

86‐88%

Not stated

No

No

Mild to moderate

Mild to moderate

Sorkness 1999

>/=50%

83‐88%

Not stated

No

No

Mild to moderate

Mild to moderate

Verona 2003

Not stated

Not stated

Exacerbation in last year requiring hospitalisation

No

Yes

Moderate to severe

Moderate to severe

Wallin 2003

Not stated

91‐2%

Symptomatoic during run‐in period despite medication

Not stated

Yes

Mild to moderate

Mild to moderate

Wasserman 1996

50‐80%

Not stated

"Mean beta2 agonist use 3.1 to 3.3 puffs/dDuring last 7 days run‐in no more than 12 puffs/d beta2 agonist and no more than 2 nights with awakening due to asthma"

No

No

Not stated

Moderate

Wolfe 1996

50‐80%

64‐66%

During 2 week run‐in period no more than 12 puffs/d beta2 agonist and no more than 2 nights with awakening due to asthma

No

Yes: dose not stated

Moderate

Moderate

Figuras y tablas -
Table 5. Asthma severity: characteristics of included patients at baseline
Table 6. Criteria for withdrawal due to lack of efficacy

Study ID

FEV1

PEFR

Beta2 agonist use

Night‐time awakening

Exacerbations

Chervinsky 1994

20% or greater decrease compared to baseline

20% decrease in morning or evening PEFR on 4 or more days out of 7 in week prior to clinic visit

12 or more puffs on 3 or more days out of 7 in week prior to clinic visit

2 or more nights with 2 awakening out of 7 in week prior to clinic visit

Any clinical exacerbation requiring emergency treatment, hospital admission or additional asthma medication other than rescue beta 2 agonist

Galant 1996

15% or greater decrease compared to baseline

20% or greater decrease in morning PEFR on 3 or more days out of 7 in week prior to clinic visit

12 or more puffs on 3 or more days out of 7 in week prior to clinic visit

3 or more awakening in week prior to clinic visit

Katz 1997

15% or greater decrease compared to baseline

15% or greater decrease in morning PEFR on 3 or more days out of 7 in week prior to clinic visit

8 or more puffs on 2 or more days out of 7 in week prior to clinic visit

2 or more nights with awakening out of 7 in week prior to clinic visit

Lawrence 1997

20% or greater decrease compared to baseline

20% or greater decrease in morning PEFR on 3 or more days out of 7 in week prior to clinic visit

12 or more puffs on 2 or more days out of 7 in week prior to clinic visit

2 or more nights with awakening out of 7 in week prior to clinic visit

any clinical exacerbation requiring emergency treatment, hospital admission or additional asthma medication other than rescue beta 2 agonist

Nathan 2000

20% or greater decrease compared to baseline

20% or greater decrease compared to baseline

12 or more puffs on 2 or more days out of 7 in week prior to clinic visit

2 or more awakening in week prior to clinic visit

Any clinical exacerbation requiring emergency treatment, hospital admission or additional asthma medication other than rescue beta 2 agonist

Pearlman 1997

20% or greater decrease compared to baseline

20% or greater decrease in morning PEFR on 3 or more days out of 7 in week prior to clinic visit

12 or more puffs on 2 or more days out of 7 in week prior to clinic visit

2 or more awakening in week prior to clinic visit

Any clinical exacerbation requiring emergency treatment, hospital admission or additional asthma medication other than rescue beta 2 agonist

Peden 1997

15% or greater decrease compared to baseline

20% or greater decrease in morning PEFR on 3 or more days out of 7 in week prior to clinic visit

12 or more puffs on 3 or more days out of 7 in week prior to clinic visit

3 or more awakening in week prior to clinic visit

Any clinical exacerbation requiring emergency treatment, hospital admission or additional asthma medication other than rescue beta 2 agonist

Raphael 1999

20% or greater decrease compared to baseline

20% or greater decrease in morning PEFR on 3 or more days out of 7 in week prior to clinic visit

12 or more puffs on 3 or more days out of 7 in week prior to clinic visit

3 or more nights with awakening out of 7 in week prior to clinic visit

Sheffer 1996

15% or greater decrease compared to baseline

20% or greater decrease in morning PEFR on 3 or more days out of 7 in week prior to clinic visit

12 or more puffs on 3 or more days out of 7 in week prior to clinic visit

3 or more nights with awakening out of 7 in week prior to clinic visit

Any clinical exacerbation requiring emergency treatment, hospital admission or additional asthma medication other than rescue beta 2 agonist

Wasserman 1996

20% or greater decrease compared to baseline

20% or greater decrease in morning PEFR on 3 or more days out of 7 in week prior to clinic visit

12 or more puffs on 3 or more days out of 7 in week prior to clinic visit

2 or more nights with awakening out of 7 in week prior to clinic visit

any clinical exacerbation requiring emergency treatment, hospital admission or additional asthma medication other than rescue beta 2 agonist

Wolfe 1996

20% or greater decrease compared to baseline

20% or greater decrease in morning PEFR on 3 or more days out of 7 in week prior to clinic visit

12 or more puffs on 3 or more days out of 7 in week prior to clinic visit

2 or more nights with awakening out of 7 in week prior to clinic visit

Any clinical exacerbation requiring emergency treatment, hospital admission or additional asthma medication other than rescue beta 2 agonist

Figuras y tablas -
Table 6. Criteria for withdrawal due to lack of efficacy
Comparison 1. Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 100 mcg/d (all ages)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

1.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

2.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

3.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

4.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5 Change in number of night‐time awakenings/week compared to baseline Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

5.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

6.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7 Number of patients withdrawn due to lack of efficacy Show forest plot

1

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

7.1 Children

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7.2 Adults

1

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 100 mcg/d (all ages)
Comparison 2. Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres) Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.2 Adults

2

313

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.04 [‐0.16, 0.08]

2 Change in FVC compared to baseline (litres) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

2.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3 Change in FEF25‐75 compared to baseline (L/second) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

3.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

4.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.2 Adults

2

313

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐7.49 [‐17.31, 2.33]

5 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

5.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.2 Adults

2

313

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐7.95 [‐17.24, 1.34]

6 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline Show forest plot

2

313

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.32 [0.10, 0.54]

6.1 Children

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.2 Adults

2

313

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.32 [0.10, 0.54]

7 Change in number of night‐time awakenings/week compared to baseline Show forest plot

2

313

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.09 [0.02, 0.16]

7.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7.2 Adults

2

313

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.09 [0.02, 0.16]

8 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d) Show forest plot

2

313

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.07 [‐0.37, 0.51]

8.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8.2 Adults

2

313

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.07 [‐0.37, 0.51]

9 Number of patients withdrawn due to lack of efficacy Show forest plot

2

313

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.48 [0.88, 2.46]

9.1 Children

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9.2 Adults

2

313

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.48 [0.88, 2.46]

10 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients) Show forest plot

2

322

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.52 [0.14, 1.97]

10.1 Children

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10.2 Adults

2

322

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.52 [0.14, 1.97]

11 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

2

322

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.27 [0.05, 1.35]

11.1 Children

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11.2 Adults

2

322

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.27 [0.05, 1.35]

12 Physician global rated efficacy: ineffective Show forest plot

1

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

12.1 Children

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.2 Adults

1

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 2. Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages)
Comparison 3. Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres) Show forest plot

10

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.1 Children

4

656

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.04 [‐0.09, 0.01]

1.2 Adults

6

887

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.03 [‐0.02, 0.07]

2 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres) Show forest plot

10

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

2.1 Children

4

656

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.03 [‐0.08, 0.02]

2.2 Adults

6

887

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.01 [‐0.05, 0.07]

3 FEV1 (% predicted) Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

3.1 Children

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4 FEV1 (% predicted) Show forest plot

2

432

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.52 [‐3.83, 2.79]

4.1 Children

1

179

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐2.0 [‐6.00, 2.00]

4.2 Adults

1

253

% (Fixed, 95% CI)

2.70 [‐3.19, 8.59]

5 FEV1 Litres Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

5.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6 PEF (L/min) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

6.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7 Change in clinic PEFR compared to baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

7.1 Children

2

351

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.00 [‐6.84, 12.84]

7.2 Adults

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

11

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

8.1 Children

4

710

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐3.67 [‐9.81, 2.46]

8.2 Adults

7

1148

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐7.04 [‐11.87, ‐2.20]

9 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

6

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

9.1 Children

2

351

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐4.50 [‐11.77, 2.77]

9.2 Adults

4

648

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐7.04 [‐12.66, ‐1.43]

10 Rescue medication usage Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

10.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d) Show forest plot

9

1409

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.14 [‐0.09, 0.37]

11.1 Children

3

522

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.18 [‐0.14, 0.49]

11.2 Adults

6

887

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.10 [‐0.21, 0.42]

12 Symptom scores Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

12.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

13 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline Show forest plot

8

1252

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.04 [‐0.07, 0.15]

13.1 Children

3

522

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.01 [‐0.17, 0.18]

13.2 Adults

5

730

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.06 [‐0.08, 0.21]

14 Change in number of night‐time awakenings/week compared to baseline Show forest plot

4

661

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.05 [0.01, 0.09]

14.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

14.2 Adults

4

661

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.05 [0.01, 0.09]

15 Percentage of symptom‐free days Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

15.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16 Change in night‐time awakening score compared to baseline Show forest plot

6

921

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.17 [0.04, 0.30]

16.1 Children

2

351

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.17 [‐0.04, 0.38]

16.2 Adults

4

570

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.17 [0.01, 0.34]

17 HRQOL: Functional Status IIR questionaire (short version) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

17.1 Children

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

17.2 Adults

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

18 HRQOL: Sleep Scale Children questionnaire Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

18.1 Children

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

18.2 Adults

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

19 HRQOL: Quality of Life of Parents of Asthmatic Children questionnaire, burden dimension Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

19.1 Children

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

19.2 Adults

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

20 HRQOL: Quality of Life of Parents of Asthmatic Children questionnaire, subjective norms dimension Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

20.1 Children

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

20.2 Adults

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

21 HRQOL: Quality of Life of Parents of Asthmatic Children questionnaire, subjective norms dimension Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

21.1 Children

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

21.2 Adults

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

22 Physician global rated efficacy: ineffective Show forest plot

2

357

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.37 [0.77, 2.44]

22.1 Children

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

22.2 Adults

2

357

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.37 [0.77, 2.44]

23 Withdrawal due to asthma exacerbation (No. of patients) Show forest plot

1

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

23.1 Children

1

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

23.2 Adults

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

24 Withdrawals due to adverse events Show forest plot

3

627

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.16 [0.54, 2.47]

24.1 Children

0

0

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

24.2 Adults

3

627

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.16 [0.54, 2.47]

25 Number of patients withdrawn due to lack of efficacy Show forest plot

9

1657

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.76, 1.35]

25.1 Children

3

522

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.25 [0.79, 1.97]

25.2 Adults

6

1135

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.88 [0.61, 1.28]

26 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

6

1150

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.98 [0.46, 2.08]

26.1 Children

2

391

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.33 [0.30, 5.90]

26.2 Adults

4

759

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.88 [0.37, 2.11]

27 Headaches Show forest plot

3

511

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.62 [0.15, 2.60]

27.1 Children

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

27.2 Adults

3

511

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.62 [0.15, 2.60]

28 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

5

841

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.87 [0.71, 4.93]

28.1 Children

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

28.2 Adults

5

841

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.87 [0.71, 4.93]

29 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients) Show forest plot

7

1365

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.65 [0.27, 1.57]

29.1 Children

2

391

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.00 [0.20, 4.99]

29.2 Adults

5

974

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.54 [0.19, 1.55]

30 Urinary free cortisol excretion (mcg/24 hours) Show forest plot

2

228

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.70 [‐3.73, 2.32]

30.1 Children

2

228

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.70 [‐3.73, 2.32]

30.2 Adults

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

31 Morning plasma cortisol (mcg/dL) Show forest plot

3

377

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.06 [‐1.01, 0.89]

31.1 Children

2

333

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.07 [‐1.14, 0.99]

31.2 Adults

1

44

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [‐2.09, 2.09]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 3. Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (all ages)
Comparison 4. Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (subgroups)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on study duration(litres) ‐ children Show forest plot

3

490

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.01 [‐0.07, 0.05]

1.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.2 1‐5 months

3

490

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.01 [‐0.07, 0.05]

1.3 6 months or more

0

0

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on study duration (litres) ‐ adults Show forest plot

6

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.03 [‐0.02, 0.07]

2.1 1‐4 weeks

0

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.2 1‐5 months

6

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.03 [‐0.02, 0.07]

2.3 6 months or more

0

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres) based on delivery devices ‐ children Show forest plot

3

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.01 [‐0.07, 0.05]

3.1 MDI

0

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.2 DPI

3

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.01 [‐0.07, 0.05]

4 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on delivery devices (litres) ‐ adults Show forest plot

6

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.03 [‐0.02, 0.07]

4.1 MDI

3

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.02 [‐0.08, 0.12]

4.2 DPI

3

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.03 [‐0.02, 0.08]

5 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on degrees of severity (litres) ‐ children Show forest plot

3

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.01 [‐0.07, 0.05]

5.1 Mild to moderate

0

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.2 Moderate

3

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.01 [‐0.07, 0.05]

6 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on degrees of severity (litres) ‐ adults Show forest plot

6

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.03 [‐0.02, 0.07]

6.1 Mild to moderate

0

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.2 Moderate

6

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.03 [‐0.02, 0.07]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 4. Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 200 mcg/d (subgroups)
Comparison 5. Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 FEV1 (% predicted) Show forest plot

4

551

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.96 [‐3.45, 1.53]

1.1 Children

2

114

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐2.48 [‐8.60, 3.64]

1.2 Adults

2

437

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.66 [‐3.39, 2.06]

2 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres) Show forest plot

9

1283

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.01 [‐0.06, 0.04]

2.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.2 Adults

9

1283

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.01 [‐0.06, 0.04]

3 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres ‐ imputed estimates) Show forest plot

11

1720

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.01 [‐0.04, 0.05]

3.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.2 Adults

11

1720

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.01 [‐0.04, 0.05]

4 Change in FVC compared to baseline (litres) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

4.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5 Change in FEF25‐75 compared to baseline (L/second) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

5.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min ‐ imputed/estimated values) Show forest plot

13

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

6.1 Children

2

876

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐7.92 [‐12.93, ‐2.91]

6.2 Adults

11

1713

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

‐1.97 [‐5.77, 1.82]

7 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

13

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

7.1 Children

2

876

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐7.92 [‐12.93, ‐2.91]

7.2 Adults

11

1703

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐4.84 [‐9.37, ‐0.31]

8 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

7

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

8.1 Children

2

874

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐9.36 [‐14.37, ‐4.35]

8.2 Adults

5

776

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐3.76 [‐9.18, 1.66]

9 PC20 Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

9.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10 PD20 Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

10.1 Children

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10.2 Adults

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d) Show forest plot

7

931

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.18 [‐0.08, 0.43]

11.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11.2 Adults

7

931

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.18 [‐0.08, 0.43]

12 Change in number of night‐time awakenings/week compared to baseline Show forest plot

2

334

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.01 [‐0.05, 0.04]

12.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.2 Adults

2

334

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.01 [‐0.05, 0.04]

13 Change in % nights without waking Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

13.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

13.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

14 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline Show forest plot

7

930

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.11 [‐0.02, 0.24]

14.1 Children

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

14.2 Adults

7

930

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.11 [‐0.02, 0.24]

15 Percentage of symptom‐free days Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

15.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16 Health related quality of life ‐ AQLQ (absolute scores)

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

16.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16.2 Adults

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

17 Number of patients withdrawn due to lack of efficacy Show forest plot

7

1294

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.41 [1.01, 1.98]

17.1 Children

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

17.2 Adults

7

1294

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.41 [1.01, 1.98]

18 Exacerbations requiring oral steroids Show forest plot

2

883

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.21 [0.72, 2.05]

18.1 Children

2

883

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.21 [0.72, 2.05]

18.2 Adults

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

19 Exacerbations requiring hospitalisation Show forest plot

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

19.1 Children

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

19.2 Adults

0

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

20 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

8

1752

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.87 [0.47, 1.61]

20.1 Children

1

528

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.65 [0.19, 2.27]

20.2 Adults

7

1224

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.95 [0.47, 1.95]

21 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

8

1825

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.98 [0.60, 1.63]

21.1 Children

2

883

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.34 [0.58, 3.08]

21.2 Adults

6

942

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.83 [0.44, 1.55]

22 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients) Show forest plot

7

1693

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.76 [0.40, 1.46]

22.1 Children

1

528

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.30 [0.29, 5.79]

22.2 Adults

6

1165

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.67 [0.32, 1.38]

23 Withdrawals due to adverse events Show forest plot

5

1161

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.65 [0.22, 1.92]

23.1 Children

1

528

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.98 [0.14, 6.99]

23.2 Adults

4

633

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.55 [0.15, 2.03]

24 No. patients with </=18 mcg/dL poststimulation cortisol Show forest plot

2

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

24.1 Children

0

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

24.2 Adults

2

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

25 AUC serum cortisol Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

25.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

25.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

26 Change in peak plasma cortisol expression Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

26.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

26.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 5. Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages)
Comparison 6. Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (subgroups)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on study duration (litres) ‐ adults Show forest plot

11

1720

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.01 [‐0.04, 0.05]

1.1 1‐4 weeks

2

293

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.09 [‐0.01, 0.19]

1.2 1‐5 months

8

1237

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.03 [‐0.08, 0.02]

1.3 6 months or longer

1

190

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.08 [‐0.03, 0.19]

2 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on delivery devices (litres) ‐ adults Show forest plot

11

1720

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.01 [‐0.04, 0.05]

2.1 MDI

8

1226

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.02 [‐0.03, 0.07]

2.2 DPI

3

494

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.02 [‐0.11, 0.06]

3 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on degrees of severity (litres) ‐ adults Show forest plot

11

1720

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.01 [‐0.04, 0.05]

3.1 Mild to moderate

3

194

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.05 [‐0.18, 0.08]

3.2 Moderate

6

1136

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.01 [‐0.05, 0.06]

3.3 Mixed

1

200

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.05 [‐0.19, 0.09]

3.4 Unclear

1

190

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.08 [‐0.03, 0.19]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 6. Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (subgroups)
Comparison 7. Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres) Show forest plot

3

351

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.01 [‐0.10, 0.09]

1.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.2 Adults

3

351

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.01 [‐0.10, 0.09]

2 FEV1 (% predicted) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

2.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

3

593

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐7.97 [‐14.58, ‐1.35]

3.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.2 Adults

3

593

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐7.97 [‐14.58, ‐1.35]

4 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

4.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5 Percentage of symptom‐free days Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

5.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline Show forest plot

2

194

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.31 [0.03, 0.60]

6.1 Children

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.2 Adults

2

194

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.31 [0.03, 0.60]

7 Change in number of night‐time awakenings/week compared to baseline Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

7.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

8.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9 Physician global rated efficacy: ineffective Show forest plot

2

400

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.25 [0.81, 1.93]

9.1 Children

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9.2 Adults

2

400

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.25 [0.81, 1.93]

10 Number of patients withdrawn due to lack of efficacy Show forest plot

2

454

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.30 [0.90, 5.90]

10.1 Children

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10.2 Adults

2

454

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.30 [0.90, 5.90]

11 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

3

615

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.02 [0.29, 3.56]

11.1 Children

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11.2 Adults

3

615

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.02 [0.29, 3.56]

12 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients) Show forest plot

3

615

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.28 [0.08, 0.92]

12.1 Children

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.2 Adults

3

615

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.28 [0.08, 0.92]

13 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

3

615

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.89 [0.32, 2.49]

13.1 Children

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

13.2 Adults

3

615

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.89 [0.32, 2.49]

14 Plasma Cortisol (AUC) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

14.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

14.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15 Clinic PEF (L/min ‐ change from baseline) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

15.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 7. Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (all ages)
Comparison 8. Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (subgroups)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on study duration (litres) ‐ adults Show forest plot

3

351

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.01 [‐0.10, 0.09]

1.1 1‐4 weeks

1

23

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.45 [‐0.88, ‐0.02]

1.2 1‐5 months

2

328

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.02 [‐0.08, 0.11]

1.3 6 months or longer

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on delivery devices (litres) ‐ adults Show forest plot

3

351

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.01 [‐0.10, 0.09]

2.1 MDI

1

23

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.45 [‐0.88, ‐0.02]

2.2 DPI

2

328

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.02 [‐0.08, 0.11]

3 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on degrees of severity (litres) ‐ adults Show forest plot

3

351

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.01 [‐0.10, 0.09]

3.1 Mild to moderate

1

23

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.45 [‐0.88, ‐0.02]

3.2 Moderate

2

328

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.02 [‐0.08, 0.11]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 8. Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 100 versus 400‐500 mcg/d (subgroups)
Comparison 9. Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 400‐500 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 FEV1 (Change from baseline ‐ litres) Show forest plot

5

900

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.01 [‐0.06, 0.04]

1.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.2 Adults

5

900

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.01 [‐0.06, 0.04]

2 Change in morning PEF (L/min) Show forest plot

4

905

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐2.30 [‐7.94, 3.35]

2.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.2 Adults

4

905

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐2.30 [‐7.94, 3.35]

3 Change in evening PEF (L/min) Show forest plot

2

505

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.83 [‐2.94, 14.60]

3.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.2 Adults

2

505

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.83 [‐2.94, 14.60]

4 Change in rescue medication (puffs/d) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

4.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5 Health‐related quality of life ‐ AQLQ (absolute scores)

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

5.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.2 Adults

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6 Change in daily symptoms compared with baseline Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

6.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7 Nocturnal awakenings (awakenings per night)

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

7.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7.2 Adults

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8 Exacerbations requiring hospitalisation Show forest plot

1

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

8.1 Children

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8.2 Adults

1

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9 Exacerbations requiring OCS treatment Show forest plot

2

363

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.24 [0.77, 1.98]

9.1 Children

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9.2 Adults

2

363

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.24 [0.77, 1.98]

10 Withdrawals (total) Show forest plot

5

1039

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.27 [0.88, 1.83]

10.1 Children

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10.2 Adults

5

1039

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.27 [0.88, 1.83]

11 Withdrawals (adverse events) Show forest plot

4

841

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.46 [0.17, 1.25]

11.1 Children

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11.2 Adults

4

841

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.46 [0.17, 1.25]

12 Withdrawals (lack of efficacy) Show forest plot

2

537

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.67 [0.73, 3.81]

12.1 Children

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.2 Adults

2

537

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.67 [0.73, 3.81]

13 Drug‐related adverse events

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

13.1 Children

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

13.2 Adults

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

14 HPA function data (am cortisol <5mcg/dL)

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

14.1 Children

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

14.2 Adults

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 9. Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 400‐500 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages)
Comparison 10. Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 400‐500 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (subgroups)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Change from baseline in FEV1 based on study duration (litres) ‐ adults Show forest plot

5

900

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.01 [‐0.06, 0.04]

1.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.2 1‐5 months

3

435

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.02 [‐0.09, 0.05]

1.3 6 months or longer

2

465

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [‐0.07, 0.07]

2 Change from baseline in FEV1 based on delivery devices (litres) ‐ adults Show forest plot

5

900

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.01 [‐0.06, 0.04]

2.1 MDI

3

435

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.02 [‐0.09, 0.05]

2.2 DPI

2

465

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [‐0.07, 0.07]

3 Change from baseline in FEV1 based on degree of severity (litres) ‐ adults Show forest plot

5

900

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.01 [‐0.06, 0.04]

3.1 Mild to moderate

1

38

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.1 [‐0.08, 0.28]

3.2 Moderate

3

575

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.03 [‐0.10, 0.04]

3.3 Moderate to severe

1

287

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [‐0.09, 0.09]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 10. Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 400‐500 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (subgroups)
Comparison 11. Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

1.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 FEV1 (% predicted) Show forest plot

2

283

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.43 [‐5.72, 4.87]

2.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.2 Adults

2

283

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.43 [‐5.72, 4.87]

3 FEV1 (Litres) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

3.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4 Change in FVC compared to baseline (litres) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

4.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5 FEF25‐75 Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

5.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6 Change in FEF25‐75 compared to baseline (L/second) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

6.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7 am PEF (Litres/min) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

7.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

2

419

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐21.86 [‐29.19, ‐14.53]

8.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8.2 Adults

2

419

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐21.86 [‐29.19, ‐14.53]

9 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

2

419

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐12.66 [‐19.32, ‐5.99]

9.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9.2 Adults

2

419

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐12.66 [‐19.32, ‐5.99]

10 Physician global rated efficacy: ineffective Show forest plot

1

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

10.1 Children

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10.2 Adults

1

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11 Symptoms Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

11.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12 Percentage of symptom‐free days Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

12.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

13 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline Show forest plot

1

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

13.1 Children

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

13.2 Adults

1

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

14 Change in number of night‐time awakenings/week compared to baseline Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

14.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

14.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15 Rescue medication usage Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

15.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

16.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

17 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

2

433

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.32 [0.11, 0.97]

17.1 Children

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

17.2 Adults

2

433

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.32 [0.11, 0.97]

18 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients) Show forest plot

2

433

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.18 [0.05, 0.59]

18.1 Children

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

18.2 Adults

2

433

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.18 [0.05, 0.59]

19 Withdrawals (total) Show forest plot

2

294

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.29 [1.59, 17.60]

19.1 Children

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

19.2 Adults

2

294

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.29 [1.59, 17.60]

20 Number of patients withdrawn due to lack of efficacy Show forest plot

2

427

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.31 [2.18, 12.96]

20.1 Children

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

20.2 Adults

2

427

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

5.31 [2.18, 12.96]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 11. Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 50‐100 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages)
Comparison 12. Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres) Show forest plot

3

489

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.11 [‐0.19, ‐0.04]

1.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.2 Adults

3

489

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.11 [‐0.19, ‐0.04]

2 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (%) Show forest plot

1

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

2.1 Children

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.2 Adults

1

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3 Change in FEV1 % predicted Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

3.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4 FEV1 (% predicted) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

4.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

4

763

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐8.32 [‐18.02, 1.37]

5.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.2 Adults

4

763

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐8.32 [‐18.02, 1.37]

6 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

2

424

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐7.81 [‐14.66, ‐0.95]

6.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.2 Adults

2

424

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐7.81 [‐14.66, ‐0.95]

7 Change in FVC compared to baseline (litres) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

7.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8 Change in FEF25‐75 compared to baseline (L/second) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

8.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9 PD20 Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

9.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline Show forest plot

2

291

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.06 [‐0.17, 0.29]

10.1 Children

0

0

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10.2 Adults

2

291

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.06 [‐0.17, 0.29]

11 Change in number of night‐time awakenings/week compared to baseline Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

11.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12 Physician global rated efficacy: ineffective Show forest plot

2

400

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.34 [0.85, 2.12]

12.1 Children

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12.2 Adults

2

400

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.34 [0.85, 2.12]

13 Change in daily use of beta2 agonist compared to baseline (puffs/d) Show forest plot

2

291

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.11 [‐0.29, 0.50]

13.1 Children

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

13.2 Adults

2

291

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.11 [‐0.29, 0.50]

14 Number of patients withdrawn due to lack of efficacy Show forest plot

4

554

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.32 [0.73, 2.40]

14.1 Children

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

14.2 Adults

4

554

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.32 [0.73, 2.40]

15 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

5

618

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.33 [0.16, 0.70]

15.1 Children

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15.2 Adults

5

618

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.33 [0.16, 0.70]

16 Sore throat or pharyngitis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

4

452

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.49 [0.18, 1.39]

16.1 Children

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16.2 Adults

4

452

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.49 [0.18, 1.39]

17 Hoarseness or dysphonia (No. of patients) Show forest plot

4

561

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.51 [0.24, 1.08]

17.1 Children

0

0

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

17.2 Adults

4

561

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.51 [0.24, 1.08]

18 Change in peak plasma cortisol compared to baseline (mcg/dL) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

18.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

18.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

19 Change in morning plasma cortisol compared to baseline (mcg/dL) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

19.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

19.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 12. Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (all ages)
Comparison 13. Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (subgroups)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on study duration (litres) ‐ adults Show forest plot

3

489

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.11 [‐0.19, ‐0.04]

1.1 1‐4 weeks

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.2 1‐5 months

3

489

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.11 [‐0.19, ‐0.04]

1.3 6 months or longer

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on delivery devices (litres) ‐ adults Show forest plot

3

489

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.11 [‐0.19, ‐0.04]

2.1 MDI

2

357

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.10 [‐0.19, ‐0.02]

2.2 DPI

1

132

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.15 [‐0.32, 0.02]

3 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline based on degrees of severity (litres) ‐ adults Show forest plot

3

489

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.11 [‐0.19, ‐0.04]

3.1 Mild to moderate

1

159

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.12 [‐0.26, 0.02]

3.2 Moderate

2

330

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.11 [‐0.20, ‐0.02]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 13. Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 800‐1000 mcg/d (subgroups)
Comparison 14. Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 4‐500 versus 1500‐2000mcg/d (all ages)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 FEV1 (Change from baseline ‐ litres) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

1.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 Clinic PEF (L/min ‐ change from baseline) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

2.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3 PC20 (methacholine) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

3.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4 PC20 AMP Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

4.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5 Symptoms (change from baseline) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

5.1 Children

0

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.2 Adults

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 14. Parallel group studies, no oral steroids: 4‐500 versus 1500‐2000mcg/d (all ages)
Comparison 15. Parallel studies, oral steroid treated: 1000‐1500 versus 2000 mcg/d

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Change in daily dose of oral prednisolone compared to baseline (mg) Show forest plot

4

274

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.00 [‐0.45, 2.45]

2 Number of patients unable to discontinue OCS completely Show forest plot

4

274

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.53 [0.88, 2.68]

3 Change in FEV1 compared to baseline (litres) Show forest plot

4

274

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.13 [‐0.24, ‐0.01]

4 Change in morning PEFR compared to baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

4

274

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐19.63 [‐34.98, ‐4.27]

5 Change in evening PEFR compared to baseline (L/min) Show forest plot

4

274

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐21.58 [‐35.20, ‐7.97]

6 Change in daily asthma symptom score compared to baseline Show forest plot

4

274

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.15 [‐0.09, 0.39]

7 Change in rescue beta2 agonist use compared to baseline (puffs/d) Show forest plot

4

274

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.14 [‐1.05, 0.78]

8 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in overall score compared to baseline Show forest plot

3

187

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.12 [‐0.48, 0.23]

9 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in activity limitation domain compared to baseline Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

10 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in symptom domain compared to baseline Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

11 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in emotional function domain compared to baseline Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

12 Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire: change in environmental exposure domain compared to baseline Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

13 Sore throat (No. of patients) Show forest plot

2

141

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.70 [0.15, 3.18]

14 Hoarseness/dysphonia (No. of patients) Show forest plot

2

141

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.92 [0.28, 2.99]

15 Oral Candidiasis (No. of patients) Show forest plot

2

141

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.96 [0.41, 2.24]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 15. Parallel studies, oral steroid treated: 1000‐1500 versus 2000 mcg/d
Comparison 16. Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 1000 mcg (all ages)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 FEV1 Show forest plot

1

Litres (Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

2 PEF Show forest plot

1

Litres/min (Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 16. Crossover studies, no oral steroids: 200 versus 1000 mcg (all ages)