Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Fluticasona en diferentes dosis para el asma crónica en adultos y niños

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003534.pub3Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 08 octubre 2008see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Vías respiratorias

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2009 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Nick P Adams

    Correspondencia a: Respiratory Medicine, Worthing & Southlands NHS Trust, Worthing, UK

    [email protected]

    [email protected]

  • Janine C Bestall

    Division of Physiological Medicine, St George's Hospital Medical School, London, UK

  • Paul Jones

    Cardiovascular Medicine, St George's Hospital Medical School, London, UK

  • Toby J Lasserson

    Community Health Sciences, St George's, University of London, London, UK

  • Benedict Griffiths

    Mayday Hospital, London, UK

  • Christopher J Cates

    Community Health Sciences, St George's, University of London, London, UK

Contributions of authors

Nick Adams retrieved papers identified by the electronic search, handsearched additional sources for relevant studies, assessed trials for methodological quality, contacted authors to clarify details of trial design and/or request missing data, extracted data from included trials and wrote the text of the review.

Janine Bestall retrieved papers identified by the search, assessed trials for methodological quality, contacted authors for clarification of trial details and/or to request missing data.

Paul Jones provided editorial support.

Toby Lasserson and Benedict Griffiths assisted with study selection, study assessment, data extraction, data entry and analysis, and interpretation and writing of the update of the review, in November 2004, and August 2008.

Chris Cates provided methodological support and guidance with the content for the November 2004 and August 2008 updates.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • No sources of support supplied

External sources

  • NHS Research and Development, UK.

  • Garfield Weston Foundation, UK.

Declarations of interest

None known.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the support staff of the Cochrane Airways Group, Liz Arnold, Anna Bara and Jane Dennis for assistance in the electronic search and retrieval of papers and Steve Milan for statistical support. We would like to thank the authors who were kind enough to provide extra details concerning their studies, including Professor DB Allen, Professor JG Ayres, Professor R Dahl, Professor E Derom, Dr Y Katz and Dr AL Sheffer. We would like to thank Julia Earnshaw and Karen Richardson who co‐coordinated efforts on behalf of Glaxo Smith Kline to search for additional studies and who provided further information regarding a number of included studies that were sponsored by the company. We are grateful to the Nederlands Astma Fonds who provided a grant which enabled us to maintain this review. We are grateful to Janet Wale who copy‐edited this review.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2008 Oct 08

Fluticasone at different doses for chronic asthma in adults and children

Review

Nick P Adams, Janine C Bestall, Paul Jones, Toby J Lasserson, Benedict Griffiths, Christopher J Cates

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003534.pub3

2005 Jul 20

Fluticasone at different doses for chronic asthma in adults and children

Review

Nick P Adams, Janine C Bestall, Paul Jones, Toby J Lasserson, Benedict Griffiths, Christopher J Cates

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003534.pub2

2000 Oct 23

Inhaled fluticasone at different doses for chronic asthma

Review

Nick P Adams, Janine C Bestall, Paul W Jones

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003534

Differences between protocol and review

We have opted against pooling data from studies in adults and children where outcomes are reported as litres (such as FEV1 and PEF). Heterogeneity in lung function outcomes such as FEV1 and PEF, are likely to be explained by differences in lung volume between these age groups since lower lung volumes in children may naturally yield results to those given by adults. However where metrics convert litres to percent predicted, and take into account age (as well as height and gender) we have retained combined estimates for adult and paediatric studies.

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.