Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Non‐invasive ventilation for cystic fibrosis

Contraer todo Desplegar todo

Referencias

Dwyer 2015 {published data only}

Dwyer TJ, Robbins L, Kelly P, Piper AJ, Bell SC, Bye PT. Non‐invasive ventilation used as an adjunct to airway clearance treatments improves lung function during an acute exacerbation of cystic fibrosis: a randomised trial. Journal of Physiotherapy 2015;61(3):142‐7. [CENTRAL: 1104106; CFGD Register: OV22; CRS: 5500135000001431; PUBMED: 26096013]CENTRAL

Fauroux 1999 {published data only}

Fauroux B, Boule M, Escurat G, Pouzet C, Harf A, Isabey D. Chest physiotherapy in cystic fibrosis: improvement of tolerance with nasal pressure support ventilation [abstract]. European Respiratory Journal. Supplement. 1997;10 Suppl 25:79S. [CENTRAL: 382789; CFGD Register: PE103b; CRS: 5500050000000431]CENTRAL
Fauroux B, Boule M, Lofaso F, Zerah F, Clement A, Harf A, et al. Chest physiotherapy in cystic fibrosis: improved tolerance with nasal pressure support ventilation. Pediatrics 1999;103(3):E32. [CFGD Register: PE103a]CENTRAL

Gozal 1997 {published data only}

Gozal D. Nocturnal ventilatory support in patients with cystic fibrosis: comparison with supplemental oxygen. European Respiratory Journal 1997;10(9):1999‐2003. [CFGD jRegister: OV10]CENTRAL

Holland 2003 {published data only}

Holland A, Denehey L, Ntoumenopoulos G, Wilson J. Non‐invasive ventilation prevents inspiratory muscle fatigue and oxygen desaturation during airway clearance in adults with exacerbations of cystic fibrosis [abstract]. Proceedings of the American Thoracic Society 99th International Conference; 2003 May 16‐21; Seattle; USA. 2003:D041. [CFGD Register: PE143b]CENTRAL
Holland A, Denehy L, Ntoumenopoulos G, McMeeken J, Wilson J. Non‐invasive ventilation prevents inspiratory muscle fatigue and oxygen desaturation during airway clearance in adults with acute exacerbations of cystic fibrosis [abstract]. Proceedings of the Thoracic Society of Australia & New Zealand Annual Scientific Meeting; 2003 April 4‐9; Adelaide, Australia. 2003:Abst #P140. [CFGD Register: PE143d]CENTRAL
Holland A, Denehy L, Ntoumenopoulos G, Naughton M, Wilson J. Non‐invasive ventilation prevents inspiratory muscle fatigue and oxygen desaturation during airway clearance in adults with acute exacerbations of cystic fibrosis [abstract]. Journal of Cystic Fibrosis 2003;2(Suppl 1):S62. [CFGD Register: PE143a]CENTRAL
Holland A, Denehy L, Ntoumenopoulos G, Naughton M, et al. Non‐invasive ventilation preserves inspiratory muscle strength and prevents oxygen desaturation during airway clearance in adults with exacerbations of cystic fibrosis [abstract]. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy 2004;50(3):A6. [CENTRAL: 547610; CFGD Register: PE143e; CRS: 5500050000000411]CENTRAL
Holland AE, Denehy L, Ntoumenopoulos G, Naughton MT, Wilson JW. Non‐invasive ventilation assists chest physiotherapy in adults with acute exacerbations of cystic fibrosis. Thorax 2003;58(10):880‐4. [CFGD Register: PE143c]CENTRAL

Kofler 1998 {published data only}

Kofler AM, Carlesi A, Cutrera R, Leone P, Lucidi V, Rosati S, et al. BiPAP versus PEP as chest physiotherapy in patients with cystic fibrosis [abstract]. Pediatric Pulmonology 1998;26(Suppl 17):344. [CFGD Register: PE95]CENTRAL

Lima 2014 {published data only}

Lima C, De Andrade AD, Rattes C, Campos S, Brandao D, Aliverti A, et al. Effect of noninvasive ventilation on functional exercise capacity, lung function and compartmental chest wall volume in children with cystic fibrosis. European Respiratory Journal 2013;42 Suppl 57:P5065. [CENTRAL: 1099891; CFGD Register: PE216b ; CRS: 5500050000000267; EMBASE: 71843506]CENTRAL
Lima CA, De Andrade ADFD, Campos SL, Brandao DC, Fregonezi G, Mourato IP, et al. Effects of noninvasive ventilation on treadmill 6‐min walk distance and regional chest wall volumes in cystic fibrosis: randomized controlled trial. Respiratory Medicine 2014;108(10):1460‐8. [CENTRAL: 1022461; CFGD Register: PE216a; CRS: 5500050000000162; EMBASE: 2014860248]CENTRAL

Milross 2001 {published and unpublished data}

Milross MA, Piper AJ, Norman M, Becker HF, Willson GN, Grunstein RR, et al. Low‐flow oxygen and bilevel ventilatory support. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2001;163(1):129‐34. [CFGD Register: OV8b]CENTRAL
Milross MA, Piper AJ, Norman M, Willson GN, Becker HF, Grunstein RR, et al. The effects of low flow oxygen and bilevel ventilatory support on gas exchange and ventilation during sleep in patients with cystic fibrosis [abstract]. Pediatric Pulmonology 1999;28(Suppl 19):285. [CFGD Register: OV8a]CENTRAL

Placidi 2006 {published data only}

Placidi G, Cornacchia M, Cappelletti LM, Mastella G, Assale BM, Braggion C. Short‐term effects of positive airway pressure on sputum clearance by directed coughing: a cross‐over randomized study [abstract]. Pediatric Pulmonology 2001;32(Suppl 22):313. [CFGD Register: PE128a]CENTRAL
Placidi G, Cornacchia M, Polese G, Zanolla L, Assael B, Braggion C. Chest physiotherapy with positive airway pressure: a pilot study of short‐term effects on sputum clearance in patients with cystic fibrosis and severe airway obstruction. Respiratory Care 2006;51(10):1145‐53. [CFGD Register: PE128b]CENTRAL

Rodriguez Hortal 2016 {published data only}

Rodriguez Hortal MC, Hjelte L. Non invasive ventilation as airway clearance technique compared to PEP in adult patients with cystic fibrosis [abstract]. Journal of Cystic Fibrosis 2013;12 Suppl 1:S18, Abstract no: WS9.4. [CENTRAL: 875000; CFGD Register: PE203a; CRS: 5500100000011654]CENTRAL
Rodriguez Hortal MC, Nygren‐Bonnier M, Hjelte L. Non‐invasive ventilation as airway clearance technique in cystic fibrosis. Physiotherapy Research International 2016 Feb 29 [Epub ahead of print]. [CFGD Register: PE203b; DOI: 10.1002/pri.1667]CENTRAL

Young 2008 {published data only}

Young AC, Wilson JW, Kotsimbos TC, Naughton MT. Online Data Supplement to 'Randomised placebo controlled trial of non‐invasive ventilation for hypercapnia in cystic fibrosis' [online]. Thorax 2008;63(1):72‐7 online. [CFGD Register: OV19c]CENTRAL
Young AC, Wilson JW, Kotsimbos TC, Naughton MT. Randomised placebo controlled trial of non‐invasive ventilation for hypercapnia in cystic fibrosis. Thorax 2008;63(1):72‐7. [CFGD Register: OV19b]CENTRAL
Young AC, Wilson JW, Kotsimbos TC, Naughton MT. Randomized placebo‐controlled trial of non‐invasive ventilation for hypercapnia in cystic fibrosis [abstract]. Proceedings of the Japanese Society of Sleep Research Conference. 2006:A9‐10. [CFGD Register: OV19a]CENTRAL

Elkins 2004 {published data only}

Elkins MR, Eberl S, Alsion J, Bye P. The effect of bi‐level non‐invasive ventilation on mucociliary clearance in subjects with cystic fibrosis [abstract].. Pediatric Pulmonology. 2004; Vol. 38(Suppl 27):315. [CFGD Register: OV20]CENTRAL

Falk 2006 {published data only}

Falk B, Nini A, Zigel L, Yahav Y, Aviram M, Rivlin J, et al. Effect of low altitude at the Dead Sea on exercise capacity and cardiopulmonary response to exercise in cystic fibrosis patients with moderate to severe lung disease. Pediatric Pulmonology 2006;41(3):234‐41. [CFGD Register: OV13]CENTRAL

Fauroux 2000a {published data only}

Fauroux B, Itti E, Pigeot J, Isabey D, Meignan M, Ferry G, et al. Optimization of aerosol deposition by pressure support in children with cystic fibrosis: an experimental and clinical study. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2000;162(6):2265‐71. [CFGD Register: DT21]CENTRAL

Fauroux 2000b {published data only}

Faurox B, Pigeot J, Isabey D, Harf A, Clèment A, Lofaso F. Two modes of non invasive mechanical ventilation can decrease the work of breathing in cystic fibrosis children with an acute exacerbation. European Respiratory Journal 2000;16(Suppl 31):15s. [CENTRAL: 415631; CFGD Register: OV23; CRS: 5500050000000270]CENTRAL

Fauroux 2001 {published data only}

Fauroux B, Pigeot J, Isabey D, Clement A, Lofaso F. In vivo physiologic comparison of two ventilators used for domiciliary ventilation in children with cystic fibrosis. Critical Care Medicine 2001;29(11):2097‐105. [CFGD Register: PH137]CENTRAL

Fauroux 2004 {published data only}

Fauroux B, Louis B, Essouri S, Leroux K, Lofaso F. Back up rate during non invasive mechanical ventilation in cystic fibrosis [abstract]. European Respiratory Journal 2003;22(Suppl 45):262s. [CFGD Register: PH157b]CENTRAL
Fauroux B, Louis B, Hart N, Essouri S, Leroux K, Clement A, et al. The effect of back‐up rate during non‐invasive ventilation in young patients with cystic fibrosis. Intensive Care Medicine 2004;30(4):673‐81. [CFGD Register: PH157a]CENTRAL

Greenough 2004 {published data only}

Greenough A, Limb E, Marlow N, Peacock JL, Calvert S. Radiological outcome of very prematurely born infants randomised to high frequency oscillatory or conventional ventilation. European Journal of Pediatrics 2004;163(11):671‐4. CENTRAL

Parreira 2008 {published data only}

Parreira V, Pires S, Sulmonett N, Camargos P, Haddad J, Britto R. Positive expiratory pressure and lung function in cystic fibrosis patients [abstract]. Proceedings of the European Respiratory Society Annual Congress; 2008 Oct 4‐8; Berlin, Germany.. 2008:E1779. [CENTRAL: 679902; CFGD Register: PE212; CRS: 5500050000000051]CENTRAL

Piper 1992 {published data only}

Piper AJ, Parker S, Torzillo PJ, Sullivan CE, Bye PTP. Nocturnal nasal IPPV stabilizes patients with cystic fibrosis and hypercapnic respiratory failure. Chest 1992;102(3):846‐50. CENTRAL

Regnis 1994 {published data only}

Regnis JA, Piper AJ, Henke KG, Parker S, Bye PTP, Sullivan CE. Benefits of nocturnal nasal CPAP in patients with cystic fibrosis. Chest 1994;106(6):1717‐24. CENTRAL

Riethmueller 2006 {published data only}

Riethmueller J, Borth‐Bruhns T, Kumpf M, Vonthein R, Wiskirchen J, Stern M, et al. Recombinant human deoxyribonuclease shortens ventilation time in young, mechanically ventilated children.. Pediatric Pulmonology 2006;41(1):61‐6. [CFGD Register: BD125]CENTRAL

Serra 2000 {published data only}

Serra A, Appendini L, Braggion C, Mastella G, Rossi A, Polese G. Noninvasive proportional assist ventilation (PAV) and pressure support ventilation (PSV) in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF): an overnight study [abstract]. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2000;161(Suppl 3):A555. [CFGD Register: OV16]CENTRAL

Serra 2002 {published data only}

Serra A, Polese G, Braggion C, Rossi A. Non‐invasive proportional assist and pressure support ventilation in patients with cystic fibrosis and chronic respiratory failure. Thorax 2002;51(7):50‐4. [CFGD Register: OV15]CENTRAL

References to studies awaiting assessment

Petrone 2009 {published data only}

Petrone A, Quartieri M, Tirone F, Tirone C, Mauro GF. Management of patients with cystic fibrosis: Role of non invasive ventilation (NIV) and chest physiotherapy [abstract]. Proceedings of European Respiratory Society Annual Congress; 2010 Sep 18‐22; Barcelona, Spain. 2010:[E3907]. [CENTRAL: 777469; CFGD Register: PE220b; CRS: 5500050000000268]CENTRAL
Petrone A, Quartieri M, Tolisano A, Tirone C, Tirone F. Non invasive ventilation (NIV) assists chest physiotherapy for treatment of patients with cystic fibrosis [abstract]. Proceedings of the European Respiratory Society Annual Congress; 2009 Sep 12‐16; Vienna, Austria. 2009:[P1262]. [CENTRAL: 758852; CFGD Register: PE220a ; CRS: 5500050000000269]CENTRAL

Ballard 1996

Ballard RD, Sutarik JM, Clover CW, Suh BY. Effects of non‐REM sleep on ventilation and respiratory mechanics in adults with cystic fibrosis. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 1996;153(1):266‐71.

Bott 2009

Bott J, Blumenthal S, Buxton M, Ellum S, Falconer C, Garrod R, et al. Guidelines for the physiotherapy management of the adult, medical spontaneously breathing patient. Thorax 2009;64(Suppl 1):i1‐i51.

Curtin 2002

Curtin F, Altman DG, Elbourne D. Meta‐analysis combining parallel and cross over trials. Statistics in Medicine 2002;21(15):2131‐44.

Davidson 2016

Davidson C, Banham S, Elliott M, Kennedy D, Gelder C, Glossop A, et al. Ventilatory Management of Acute Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure Guideline. Thorax 2016;71 Suppl 2:ii1–ii35. [DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl‐2015‐208209]

Elbourne 2002

Elbourne DR, Altman DG, Higgins JPT, Curtin F, Worthington HV, Vail A. Meta‐analyses involving cross‐over trials: methodological issues. International Epidemiological Association 2002;31(1):140‐9.

Fuchs 1994

Fuchs HJ, Borowitz DS, Christiansen DH, Morris EM, Nash ML, Ramsey BW, et al. Effect of aerosolized recombinant human DNase on exacerbations of respiratory symptoms and on pulmonary function in patients with cystic fibrosis. The Pulmozyme Study Group. New England Journal of Medicine 1994;331(10):637‐42.

Higgins 2003

Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta‐analyses. BMJ 2003;327(7414):557‐60.

Hodson 1991

Hodson ME, Madden BP, Steven MH, Tsang VT, Yacoub MH. Non‐invasive mechanical ventilation for CF patients ‐ a potential bridge to transplantation. European Respiratory Journal 1991;4(5):524‐7.

Jüni 2001

Jüni P, Altman DG, Egger M. Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials. BMJ 2001;323(7303):42‐6.

RevMan 2014 [Computer program]

The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). Version Version 5.3. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014.

Stata 2001 [Computer program]

Stata Corporation. Stata. Statistical Software. Version 7.0. College Station, Texas: Stata Corporation, 2001.

UK CF Trust 2011

UK CF Trust. Standards for the clinical care of children and adults with CF in the UK 2011. www.cysticfibrosis.org.uk/the‐work‐we‐do/clinical‐care/consensus‐documents (accessed 07 July 2016).

Yankaskas 1999

Yankaskas JR, Egan TM, Mauro MA. Major Complications. In: Yankaskas JR, Knowles MR editor(s). Cystic Fibrosis in Adults. Philadelphia: Lippincott‐Raven, 1999:175‐94.

Zinman 1989

Zinman R, Corey M, Coates AL, Canny GJ, Connolly J, Levison H, et al. Nocturnal home oxygen in the treatment of hypoxaemic cystic fibrosis patients. Journal of Pediatrics 1989;114(3):368‐77.

References to other published versions of this review

Moran 2003

Moran F, Bradley J. Non‐invasive ventilation for cystic fibrosis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2003, Issue 2. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002769.pub2]

Moran 2007

Moran F, Bradley JM, Jones AP, PiperAJ. Non‐invasive ventilation for cystic fibrosis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2007, Issue 10. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002769.pub2]

Moran 2011

Moran F, Bradley J, Piper AJ. Non‐invasive ventilation for cystic fibrosis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011, Issue 5. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002769.pub3]

Moran 2013

Moran F, Bradley JM, Piper AJ. Non‐invasive ventilation for cystic fibrosis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002769.pub4]

Characteristics of studies

Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]

Dwyer 2015

Methods

RCT.

Parallel design.
Duration: up to 2 weeks (during hospitalisation for an exacerbation).

Location: 2 hospital sites.

Participants

40 adults with CF and an acute exacerbation (defined as needing intravenous antibiotics and four or more signs or symptoms from criteria by Fuchs (Fuchs 1994).

Moderate to severe disease FEV₁ <60% predicted.

NIV group

Mean (SD) age: 28 (7) years.

Gender n (%): 6 (32) females.

BMI mean (SD): 21.4 (3.1) kg/m².

FVC mean (SD): 61 (15) % predicted.

PImax mean (SD): 87 (32) % predicted.

PEmax mean (SD): 70 (22) % predicted.

Control group

Mean (SD) age: 30 (9) years.

Gender n (%): 8 (38) females.

BMI mean (SD): 20.4 (3.0) kg/m².

FVC mean (SD): 63 (15) % predicted.

PImax mean (SD): 93 (30) % predicted.

PEmax mean (SD): 92 (41) % predicted.

Interventions

Intervention (n = 19): versus standard airway clearance + NIV delivered by a nasal mask or mouthpiece.

Control: standard airway clearance.

NIV: mean (SD) IPAP 13 cm H₂0 (2); mean (SD) EPAP: 5 cm H₂0 (1).

Standard airway clearance = ACBT+ percussions; vibrations; postural drainage; some other techniques were also used for some treatments.

Outcomes

Primary outcome measure: change in FEV₁ % predicted from admission to discharge.

Secondary outcome measures: visual analogue score; modified shuttle walk test; shortness of breath; sputum volume; energy levels; PImax, PEmax; quality of life (CFQ); quantitative sputum microbiology, length of admission; time to next hospital admission.

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

"Computer‐generated block randomisation".

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

Randomisation schedule was "... stored in sealed sequentially numbered opaque envelopes opened after consent signed".

Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes

High risk

It is not possible to blind participants or assessors to the intervention.

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

All participants accounted for. Three participants withdrew from the study and the data from these participants were used, as available and appropriate, in the analyses of daily rate of improvement, length of stay and time to next hospital admission.

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Low risk

All the outcomes listed in the paper's methodology are the same as those presented in the results section of the full paper.

Other bias

Low risk

Methods of statistical analysis were described.

Fauroux 1999

Methods

RCT.

Cross‐over design.

Duration: single session.

Participants

16 participants with CF. Stable participants.
Mean (SD) age 13 (4) years.

Interventions

Session 1: CPT (10 to 15 forced expiration manoeuvres separated by rest periods) and inspiratory PSV via nasal mask using pressure support generator.
Session 2: CPT with no PSV.

Sessions 20 minutes each but time between sessions unclear ‐ paper states sessions were conducted on 2 different days at the same time of day by same physiotherapist.

Outcomes

Lung function (FVC; FEV₁; PEF; FEF25%; FEF50%; FEF25‐75%), airway resistance, SpO₂; RR; PImax; PEmax; sputum weight; subjective participants impressions of fatigue, ease sputum clearance; participant preference (1 = worse to 3 = marked preference).

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

States order of intervention was randomised, but no details given.

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Not discussed.

Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Participants' subjective impressions were evaluated by individuals who were not involved in the trial and were unaware of the treatment regimen; but it was not reported who was responsible for collecting and weighing secretions and lung function testing.

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

All participants were accounted for.

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Low risk

All outcome measures were reported.

Other bias

Low risk

Methods of statistical analysis were described.

Gozal 1997

Methods

RCT.

Cross‐over design.

Duration: 3 nights within a 15‐day period.

Participants

Six participants with CF and moderate to severe lung disease and significant gas exchange abnormalities during sleep. Stable participants.
Age mean (SD) [range]: 22.3 (4.7) [13 ‐ 28].

FEV₁% predicted mean (SD): 29.4% (3.4).

Interventions

Session 1: room air.
Session 2: night‐time bilevel NIPPV with supplemental oxygen given via nasal mask.

Outcomes

TST; sleep latency; NREM; NREM %TST; REM min; REM %TST; undetermined % TST; total arousals; arousal index; SaO₂; TcCO₂.

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Stated as randomised, methods not discussed.

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Not discussed.

Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Participants were obviously aware of the intervention being administered; however, all were reportedly unaware of the purpose of the trial with participants and sleep technicians blinded to the results until completion of the third night.

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

2 participants dropped out due to non‐tolerance of NIV; it was not explicitly stated that intention‐to‐treat was not used, but results are based on the remaining 6 participants who completed the trial.

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Low risk

All outcome measures were reported.

Other bias

Unclear risk

Methods of statistical analysis were described.

Holland 2003

Methods

RCT (order of intervention was randomised on days 3 and 4 of hospital admission).

Cross‐over design.

Duration: single intervention of each.

Participants

26 participants with CF and moderate to severe disease. Acute participants.
Mean (SD) age 27.04 (6.42) years.
Mean (SD) FEV₁ % predicted 33.85 (11.85).

Interventions

Session 1: CPT by ACBT i.e. (thoracic expansion x6, breathing control) x2, FET and cough as required.

Session 2: ACBT as above with NIV via nasal mask with heated humidification entrained.

NIV range: IPAP 10 ‐ 12 cm H₂0; EPAP 4 ‐ 5 cm H₂0.

Outcomes

FVC; FEV₁; FEF25‐75; PImax; PEmax; SpO₂; sputum weight; Borg breathlessness score; participant preference.

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

States order of intervention was randomised, but no details given.

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Not discussed.

Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

An independent data collector who was blinded to the treatment order obtained all measurements.

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Information provided about 1 drop out at the start of testing.

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Low risk

All outcome measures were reported.

Other bias

Unclear risk

Methods of statistical analysis were described.

Kofler 1998

Methods

RCT.

Cross‐over design.

Duration: single sessions on 2 successive days, time between 2 sessions is 1 day.

Participants

20 participants with CF. No detail on whether participants are in acute or stable state, but participants have mean (SD) Swachman‐Kowalski score of 80.8 (15.3) indicating that they have mild disease.
Mean (range) age 15.25 (6 ‐ 23) years.

Interventions

Session 1: PEP treatment (no details of PEP treatment).
Session 2: bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPaP) treatment, type of interface unclear.

Outcomes

FEV₁; FVC; SaO₂; FEF25‐75; MEF50; FEF25‐75; participant preference.

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

States order of intervention was randomised, but no details given.

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Not discussed.

Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Data collection was not described.

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

All participants were accounted for.

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

Not clear whether all outcomes measured were reported in this abstract.

Other bias

Unclear risk

Methods of statistical analysis were not described.

Lima 2014

Methods

RCT.

Cross‐over design.

Duration: single session, each 24 to 48 hrs apart.

Participants

13 participants with CF. Mild, moderate and severe lung disease. Stable state with no history of hospitalisation for respiratory failure in previous 3 months.
Mean age: 10.77 years.

Mean FEV₁ % predicted: 62%.

Mean BMI: 33.78 kg/m².

Interventions

Session 1: 6MWT with (type of interface unclear).

Session 2: 6MWT with no NIV.

6MWT speed 2.5 km/h and increased every 30 seconds up to a maximum of 7 km/h.

NIV: IPAP 12 cm H₂0; EPAP mean (SD) 6 (2) cm H₂0.

Outcomes

Walking distance, spirometry (FEV₁, FVC, FEF 25‐75), OEP (TV, MV, Vprc, Vab), RR, HR, SpO₂.

OEP and spirometry measured before and 5 min after test.

RR, HR and SpO₂ measured immediately before, immediately after and 5 min after test.

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

Computer‐generated random permutated blocks.

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Not discussed.

Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes

High risk

Open trial ‐ no evidence so no blinding of assessors, investigators or participants in the published report.

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

All participants accounted for.

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Low risk

Primary outcomes in protocol were reported. Some indices of secondary outcomes regarding rib cage volume P values reported in the abstract, but not reported within the full text i.e. VRCP, VRCA, and VAB.

Other bias

Low risk

Methods of statistical analysis were described.

Milross 2001

Methods

RCT.

Cross‐over design.

Duration: 3 nights within a 1‐week period, time between nights unclear.

Participants

13 participants with CF with severe lung disease.
Mean (SD) age: 26 (5.9) years.
Mean (SD) FEV₁ % predicted: 31.7% (10.6).

Awake PaO₂ (range): 53 ‐ 77 mmHg.

PaCO₂ ≥ 45 mmHg.

BMI mean (SD): 20 (3) kg/m².

Interventions

Session 1: room air and low‐level CPAP (4 ‐ 5 cm H₂O).
Session 2: oxygen (1.4 +/‐ 0.9L/min to maintain SaO₂ ≥ 90%) and low‐level CPAP (4 ‐ 5 cm H₂O) via a nasal mask.
Session 3: BVS +/‐ oxygen (0.7+/‐0.9 L/min to maintain SaO₂ ≥ 90%).

Outcomes

VI, VT; RR; respiratory disturbance indices; SaO₂ TcCO₂.

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Stated as randomised, methods not discussed.

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Not discussed.

Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes

High risk

No evidence of blinding of assessors, investigators or participants.

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

No drop outs.

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Low risk

All outcome measures were reported.

Other bias

Unclear risk

Methods of statistical analysis were described.

Placidi 2006

Methods

RCT.

Cross‐over design.

Duration: treatment 2x daily for 70 min for 2 days per intervention.

Participants

17 participants with CF. Severe lung disease. Acute participants.
Mean (SD) age: 27 (7) years.

FEV₁ % predicted mean (SD): 25% (6).

BMI mean (SD): 18 (3) kg/m².

MIP % predicted mean (SD): 87% (17).

Wet weight sputum mean (SD): 5 (5) g.

Interventions

Intervention 1: directed cough;
Intervention 2: PEP via nasal mask.
Intervention 3: CPAP via nasal mask;
Intervention for NIV with IPAP 8 ‐ 12 cm H₂O; EPAP 4 cm H₂O.

Outcomes

Sputum wet and dry weight; number spontaneous coughs; FEV₁; FVC; FEF; mean SpO₂; participants subjective impression of the effectiveness and fatigue induced by each treatment.

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

Randomisation of treatment order was done according to the Latin square design which provided a balanced assignment to each treatment and a balance in the sequence of treatments.

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

Not discussed.

Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Physiotherapists collected sputum and the technician was blinded to physiotherapy treatment but it is not identified who was responsible for weighing sputum or collating cough information induced by the treatment.

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

All participants were accounted for.

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Low risk

All outcome measures were reported.

Other bias

Unclear risk

Methods of statistical analysis were described.

Rodriguez Hortal 2016

Methods

RCT.

Parallel design.

Duration: both interventions given 2x daily for 60 min for 3 months.

Participants

32 participants with CF.

Mean (SD) age: 31 (10) years.

Moderate to severe lung disease.

Baseline FEV₁ % predicted mean (SD) (range): 47% (14) (22% to 69%).

Baseline FVC % predicted mean (SD): 69% (13).%.

Interventions

Intervention 1: treatment including bronchodilators; AD with HTS for 15 min; then NIV with face mask; FET/huffing from mid to low lung volume.
Intervention 2: treatment including bronchodilators; AD with HTS for 15 min; then PEP with mask; FET/huffing from mid to low lung volume.

NIV: IPAP 20 cm H₂O minimum; EPAP 10 cm H₂O.

PEP: 10 breaths with 10 to 20 cm H₂O resistance.

Outcomes

Lung function (FEV₁; FVC; LCI), 6MWT, PaCO₂, sputum culture, inflammatory blood markers.

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

States randomised but no further details given.

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

States opaque envelopes were used to assign to 1 of 2 groups.

Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Pulmonary lab technicians blinded to physiotherapy treatment took lung function readings; research nurses blinded to treatment took vital signs; 6MWT was performed by the physiotherapist although it is unclear if the physiotherapist conducting the 6MWT is blinded to treatment allocation.

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

All participants were accounted for.

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Low risk

It is stated that inflammatory blood markers, blood gases and sputum analysis monthly was non‐significant compared to baseline (data not reported); FRC did not change in either group (data not reported).

All other outcome measures were reported.

Other bias

Low risk

Methods of statistical analysis were reported.

Young 2008

Methods

RCT.

Cross‐over design.

Duration: each intervention for 6 weeks with 2‐week washout period.

Participants

8 participants with CF. Moderate and severe lung disease. No details on whether participants are in acute or stable state.
Mean (SD) age: 37 (8) years.

Mean (SD) FEV₁ % predicted: 35% (8).

Mean (SD) BM:I 21.1 (2.6) kg/m².

Mean (SD) PaCO₂: 52 (4) mmHg.

Interventions

Intervention 1: nocturnal air (placebo).

Intervention 2: oxygen via nasal or full face mask.

Intervention 2: NIV via nasal or full face mask.

Outcomes

CF‐specific QoL questionnaire; daytime sleepiness; exertional dyspnoea; awake and asleep gas exchange; sleep architecture; lung function; peak exercise capacity.

Post‐treatment assessments were carried out during a period of clinical stability i.e. no current need for hospitalisation or intravenous antibiotics.

Notes

Also measured neurocognitive function (PVT :mean; error; lapse); Stroop Color & Word test; trail‐making test; controlled oral word association and digital span test which were reported in the online supplement. They are not reported in this review as they were not relevant to the aims of this review.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

Computer‐generated Latin square design.

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

Sealed in sequentially numbered opaque envelopes by a person not involved in the trial and opened as each participant was enrolled.

Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes

Unclear risk

Participants remained blinded as to whether they were receiving oxygen or room air only.

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

One withdrawal after randomisation due to a pneumothorax. One withdrawal from NIV group due to mask discomfort (NIV n = 7; O₂ n = 8).

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Low risk

All outcome measures were reported.

Other bias

Low risk

Methods of statistical analysis were described.

Full abbreviations list can be found in "Additional Tables" (Table 1)

Characteristics of excluded studies [ordered by study ID]

Study

Reason for exclusion

Elkins 2004

This trial did not compare NIV to increase minute ventilation and is not linked to the outcome measures in this review.

Falk 2006

This trial did not use NIV.

Fauroux 2000a

This trial did not compare NIV with other management for acute or chronic respiratory failure.

Fauroux 2000b

This trial is not comparing NIV with other management strategies for acute or chronic respiratory failure.

Fauroux 2001

This is not a randomised controlled trial of NIV versus no NIV.

Fauroux 2004

This trial did not compare NIV with other management for acute or chronic respiratory failure.

Greenough 2004

This trial did not use NIV.

Parreira 2008

This trial did not use NIV pressure or volume preset mode.

Piper 1992

This is not a randomised controlled trial.

Regnis 1994

This is not a randomised controlled trial.

Riethmueller 2006

This trial did not use NIV.

Serra 2000

This is not a randomised controlled trial of NIV versus no NIV.

Serra 2002

This is not a randomised controlled trial of NIV versus no NIV.

see Table 1

Characteristics of studies awaiting assessment [ordered by study ID]

Petrone 2009

Methods

Participants divided into 3 random groups.

Sleep studies performed on respiratory ward supervised by experienced nurses.

Duration: 6 months treatment.

Participants

21 participants.

Mean (SD) age: 27.3 (3.7) years.

Mean (SD) FEV₁ % predicted: 44.1% (3.10).

Interventions

Group 1: ACBT.

Group 2: ACBT with oxygen.

Group 3: ACBT with NIV.

Outcomes

Frequency of respiratory exacerbations; arterial blood gases; spirometry; SWT; sleep parameters: AHI; mean SaO₂%; % of TST; oxygen desaturation index; SpO₂ mean % of TST; TcCO₂ mean of TST.

Notes

This is all the detail which is recorded in the abstract. To be completed once full study details are available.

see Table 1

Data and analyses

Open in table viewer
Comparison 1. NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 CFQ scores Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 1 CFQ scores.

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 1 CFQ scores.

1.1 Physical Domain

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.2 Health Domain

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.3 Respiratory Domain

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 Fatigue Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 2 Fatigue.

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 2 Fatigue.

3 FEV1 (L) Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 3 FEV1 (L).

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 3 FEV1 (L).

3.1 Up to 1 week (directed cough)

2

86

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.03 [‐0.17, 0.12]

3.2 Up to 1 week (PEP)

1

34

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.05 [‐0.22, 0.12]

4 FEV1 (% predicted) Show forest plot

3

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 4 FEV1 (% predicted).

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 4 FEV1 (% predicted).

4.1 Up to 1 week (directed cough)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.2 Up to 2 weeks (all techniques combined)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.3 Up to 3 months (PEP)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5 FVC (L) Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 5 FVC (L).

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 5 FVC (L).

5.1 Up to 1 week (directed cough)

2

86

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.00 [‐0.30, 0.30]

5.2 Up to 1 week (PEP)

1

34

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.07 [‐0.47, 0.33]

6 FVC (% predicted) Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 6 FVC (% predicted).

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 6 FVC (% predicted).

6.1 Up to 1 week (directed cough)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.2 Up to 3 months (PEP)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7 FEF25‐75 (L) Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 1.7

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 7 FEF25‐75 (L).

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 7 FEF25‐75 (L).

7.1 Up to 1 week (directed cough)

2

86

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.00 [‐0.08, 0.07]

7.2 Up to 1 week (PEP)

1

34

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [‐0.07, 0.07]

8 FEF25‐75 (% predicted) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 1.8

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 8 FEF25‐75 (% predicted).

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 8 FEF25‐75 (% predicted).

8.1 Up to 1 week (directed cough)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9 Respiratory muscle strength PImax (cmH20) Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 1.9

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 9 Respiratory muscle strength PImax (cmH20).

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 9 Respiratory muscle strength PImax (cmH20).

9.1 Up to 1 week (all techniques combined)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9.2 Up to 2 weeks (all techniques combined)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10 Respiratory muscle strength PEmax (cmH20) Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 1.10

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 10 Respiratory muscle strength PEmax (cmH20).

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 10 Respiratory muscle strength PEmax (cmH20).

10.1 Up to 1 week (all techniques combined)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10.2 Up to 2 weeks (all techniques combined)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11 Airway resistance % predicted Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 1.11

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 11 Airway resistance % predicted.

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 11 Airway resistance % predicted.

11.1 Up to 1 week (all techniques combined)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12 LCI Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 1.12

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 12 LCI.

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 12 LCI.

12.1 Up to 3 months (PEP)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

13 Oxygen saturation during airway clearance (%) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 1.13

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 13 Oxygen saturation during airway clearance (%).

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 13 Oxygen saturation during airway clearance (%).

13.1 Up to 1 week (all techniques combined)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

14 Oxygen saturation during airway clearance (change in SpO2 % during treatment) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 1.14

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 14 Oxygen saturation during airway clearance (change in SpO2 % during treatment).

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 14 Oxygen saturation during airway clearance (change in SpO2 % during treatment).

14.1 Up to 1 week (all techniques combined)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15 Oxygen saturation after airway clearance (SpO2) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 1.15

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 15 Oxygen saturation after airway clearance (SpO2).

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 15 Oxygen saturation after airway clearance (SpO2).

15.1 Up to 1 week (directed cough)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15.2 Up to 1 week (PEP)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16 PaCO2 Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 1.16

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 16 PaCO2.

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 16 PaCO2.

16.1 Up to 3 months (PEP)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

17 Breathlessness Show forest plot

2

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 1.17

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 17 Breathlessness.

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 17 Breathlessness.

17.1 Up to 1 week (Borg breathlessness score)

1

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

17.2 Up to 2 weeks (VAS score)

1

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

18 Sputum wet weight (g) Show forest plot

3

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 1.18

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 18 Sputum wet weight (g).

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 18 Sputum wet weight (g).

18.1 Up to 1 week (directed cough)

3

118

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.69 [‐3.06, 1.67]

18.2 Up to 1 week (PEP)

1

34

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐2.58 [‐6.11, 0.95]

19 Sputum dry weight (g) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 1.19

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 19 Sputum dry weight (g).

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 19 Sputum dry weight (g).

19.1 Up to 1 week (directed cough)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

19.2 Up to 1 week (PEP)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

20 Sputum volume per day (VAS score) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 1.20

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 20 Sputum volume per day (VAS score).

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 20 Sputum volume per day (VAS score).

20.1 Up to 2 weeks (all techniques combined)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

21 Pseudomonas density (log CFU/g) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 1.21

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 21 Pseudomonas density (log CFU/g).

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 21 Pseudomonas density (log CFU/g).

21.1 Up to 2 weeks (all techniques combined)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

22 Exercise capacity: 25 level modified shuttle test (m) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 1.22

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 22 Exercise capacity: 25 level modified shuttle test (m).

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 22 Exercise capacity: 25 level modified shuttle test (m).

22.1 Up to 2 weeks (all techniques combined)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

23 Energy (VAS score) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 1.23

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 23 Energy (VAS score).

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 23 Energy (VAS score).

23.1 Up to 2 weeks (all techniques combined)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

24 6MWT Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 1.24

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 24 6MWT.

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 24 6MWT.

24.1 Up to 3 months (PEP)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

25 Length of hospital stay (days) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 1.25

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 25 Length of hospital stay (days).

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 25 Length of hospital stay (days).

25.1 Up to 2 weeks (all techniques combined)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

26 Time to next admission (days) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 1.26

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 26 Time to next admission (days).

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 26 Time to next admission (days).

Open in table viewer
Comparison 2. NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 CFQoL chest symptom score Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 1 CFQoL chest symptom score.

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 1 CFQoL chest symptom score.

1.1 Up to 3 months

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 CFQoL transitional dyspnoea index Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 2 CFQoL transitional dyspnoea index.

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 2 CFQoL transitional dyspnoea index.

2.1 Up to 3 months

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3 Symptoms of sleep‐disordered breathing Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 2.3

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 3 Symptoms of sleep‐disordered breathing.

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 3 Symptoms of sleep‐disordered breathing.

3.1 Epworth Sleepiness Scale (up to 3 months)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.2 Global PSQI (up to 3 months)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4 Lung function during sleep Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 2.4

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 4 Lung function during sleep.

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 4 Lung function during sleep.

4.1 VI (L/m) while awake (single night)

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.2 VI (L/m) during REM (single night)

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.3 VI (L/m) during NREM (single night)

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.4 VT (L) while awake (single night)

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.5 VT (L) during REM (single night)

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.6 VT (L) during NREM (single night)

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5 Respiratory rate (breaths/min) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 2.5

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 5 Respiratory rate (breaths/min).

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 5 Respiratory rate (breaths/min).

5.1 RR while awake (single night)

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.2 RR during REM (single night)

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.3 RR during NREM (single night)

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6 Lung function while awake Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 2.6

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 6 Lung function while awake.

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 6 Lung function while awake.

6.1 FEV1% predicted (up to 3 months)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.2 FVC % predicted (up to 3 months)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7 Arterial blood gases: pH Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 2.7

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 7 Arterial blood gases: pH.

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 7 Arterial blood gases: pH.

7.1 Up to 3 months

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8 Arterial blood gases: PaO2 (mmHg) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 2.8

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 8 Arterial blood gases: PaO2 (mmHg).

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 8 Arterial blood gases: PaO2 (mmHg).

8.1 Up to 3 months

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9 Arterial blood gases: PaCO2 (mmHg) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 2.9

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 9 Arterial blood gases: PaCO2 (mmHg).

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 9 Arterial blood gases: PaCO2 (mmHg).

9.1 Up to 3 months

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10 Arterial blood gases: HCO3 (mmol/L) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 2.10

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 10 Arterial blood gases: HCO3 (mmol/L).

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 10 Arterial blood gases: HCO3 (mmol/L).

10.1 Up to 3 months

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11 Arterial blood gases: SaO2 (%) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 2.11

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 11 Arterial blood gases: SaO2 (%).

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 11 Arterial blood gases: SaO2 (%).

11.1 Up to 3 months

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12 Exercise performance (MSWT) (metres) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 2.12

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 12 Exercise performance (MSWT) (metres).

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 12 Exercise performance (MSWT) (metres).

12.1 Up to 3 months

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

13 Total sleep time (min) Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 2.13

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 13 Total sleep time (min).

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 13 Total sleep time (min).

13.1 Single night

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

13.2 Up to 3 months

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

14 REM sleep architecture Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 2.14

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 14 REM sleep architecture.

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 14 REM sleep architecture.

14.1 REM (single night)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

14.2 REM %TST (single night)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

14.3 REM % TST (up to 3 months)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15 Sleep latency (min) Show forest plot

3

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 2.15

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 15 Sleep latency (min).

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 15 Sleep latency (min).

15.1 Single night

2

38

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.93 [‐0.32, 6.19]

15.2 Up to 3 months

1

15

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐5.0 [‐19.17, 9.17]

16 Nocturnal oxygen saturation (%) Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 2.16

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 16 Nocturnal oxygen saturation (%).

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 16 Nocturnal oxygen saturation (%).

16.1 Mean SpO2 REM (single night)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16.2 Mean SpO2 NREM (single night)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16.3 Mean SpO2 for TST (up to 3 months)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16.4 TST with SpO2 < 90% (up to 3 months)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

17 Nocturnal oxygen saturation (%) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 2.17

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 17 Nocturnal oxygen saturation (%).

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 17 Nocturnal oxygen saturation (%).

17.1 Percentage TST SpO2>90%

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

17.2 Percentage REM SpO2>90%

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

17.3 Percentage NREM SpO2>90%

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

18 Nocturnal TcCO2 (mmHg Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 2.18

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 18 Nocturnal TcCO2 (mmHg.

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 18 Nocturnal TcCO2 (mmHg.

18.1 TcCO2 during REM (single night)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

18.2 TcCO2 during NREM (single night)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

18.3 Mean change PtCO2 (mmHg) (up to 3 months)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

18.4 Mean change PaCO2 (mmHg) (up to 3 months)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

19 Nocturnal TcCO2 (mmHg) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 2.19

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 19 Nocturnal TcCO2 (mmHg).

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 19 Nocturnal TcCO2 (mmHg).

19.1 Mean change TcCO2 NREM to REM (single night)

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

19.2 Maximum TcCO2 (single night)

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

20 Nocturnal TcCO2 TST (mmHg) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 2.20

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 20 Nocturnal TcCO2 TST (mmHg).

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 20 Nocturnal TcCO2 TST (mmHg).

20.1 Mean PtCO2 TST (up to 3 months)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

20.2 Maximum PtCO2 TST (up to 3 months)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

21 Hypopneas Show forest plot

1

Relative rate (Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 2.21

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 21 Hypopneas.

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 21 Hypopneas.

21.1 Single night

1

Relative rate (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

22 Mean heart rate (beats/min) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 2.22

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 22 Mean heart rate (beats/min).

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 22 Mean heart rate (beats/min).

22.1 Up to 3 months

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

23 Respiratory rate Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 2.23

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 23 Respiratory rate.

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 23 Respiratory rate.

23.1 Up to 3 months

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Open in table viewer
Comparison 3. NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 CF QoL chest symptom score Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 1 CF QoL chest symptom score.

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 1 CF QoL chest symptom score.

1.1 Up to 3 months

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 CF QoL traditional dyspnoea index score Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 3.2

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 2 CF QoL traditional dyspnoea index score.

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 2 CF QoL traditional dyspnoea index score.

2.1 Up to 3 months

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3 Symptoms of sleep‐disordered breathing Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 3.3

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 3 Symptoms of sleep‐disordered breathing.

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 3 Symptoms of sleep‐disordered breathing.

3.1 Epworth sleepiness scale (up to 3 months)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.2 Global PSQI (up to 3 months)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4 Lung function during sleep Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 3.4

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 4 Lung function during sleep.

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 4 Lung function during sleep.

4.1 VI while awake (single night)

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.2 VI during REM (single night)

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.3 VI during NREM (single night)

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.4 VT while awake (single night)

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.5 VT during REM (single night)

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.6 VT during NREM (single night)

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5 Respiratory rate(breaths/min) during sleep Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 3.5

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 5 Respiratory rate(breaths/min) during sleep.

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 5 Respiratory rate(breaths/min) during sleep.

5.1 RR while awake (single night)

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.2 RR during REM (single night)

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.3 RR during NREM (single night)

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6 Mean Respiratory Rate Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 3.6

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 6 Mean Respiratory Rate.

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 6 Mean Respiratory Rate.

6.1 Up to 3 months

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7 Mean Heart Rate (beats/min) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 3.7

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 7 Mean Heart Rate (beats/min).

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 7 Mean Heart Rate (beats/min).

7.1 Up to 3 months

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8 Lung function while awake Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 3.8

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 8 Lung function while awake.

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 8 Lung function while awake.

8.1 FEV1% predicted (up to 3 months)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8.2 FVC % predicted (up to 3 months)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9 Arterial blood gases: pH Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 3.9

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 9 Arterial blood gases: pH.

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 9 Arterial blood gases: pH.

9.1 Up to 3 months

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10 Arterial blood gases: PaO2 (mmHg) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 3.10

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 10 Arterial blood gases: PaO2 (mmHg).

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 10 Arterial blood gases: PaO2 (mmHg).

10.1 Up to 3 months

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11 Arterial blood gases: PaCO2 (mmHg) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 3.11

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 11 Arterial blood gases: PaCO2 (mmHg).

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 11 Arterial blood gases: PaCO2 (mmHg).

11.1 Up to 3 months

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12 Arterial blood gases: HCO3 (mmol/L) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 3.12

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 12 Arterial blood gases: HCO3 (mmol/L).

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 12 Arterial blood gases: HCO3 (mmol/L).

12.1 Up to 3 months

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

13 Arterial blood gases: SaO2 (%) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 3.13

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 13 Arterial blood gases: SaO2 (%).

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 13 Arterial blood gases: SaO2 (%).

13.1 Up to 3 months

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

14 Exercise performance (metres) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 3.14

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 14 Exercise performance (metres).

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 14 Exercise performance (metres).

14.1 Up to 3 months

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15 Total sleep time (min) Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 3.15

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 15 Total sleep time (min).

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 15 Total sleep time (min).

15.1 Single night

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15.2 Up to 3 months

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16 REM sleep architecture Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 3.16

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 16 REM sleep architecture.

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 16 REM sleep architecture.

16.1 REM (single night)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16.2 REM %TST (single night)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16.3 REM % TST (up to 3 months)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

17 Sleep latency Show forest plot

3

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 3.17

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 17 Sleep latency.

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 17 Sleep latency.

17.1 Single night

2

38

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐2.63 [‐7.37, 2.11]

17.2 At 6 weeks

1

15

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐3.00 [‐19.88, 13.88]

18 Nocturnal oxygen saturation (%) Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 3.18

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 18 Nocturnal oxygen saturation (%).

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 18 Nocturnal oxygen saturation (%).

18.1 Mean SpO2 REM (single night)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

18.2 Mean SpO2 NREM (single night)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

18.3 Mean SpO2 for TST (up to 3 months)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

18.4 TST for SpO2 < 90% (up to 3 months)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

19 Nocturnal oxygen saturation (%) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 3.19

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 19 Nocturnal oxygen saturation (%).

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 19 Nocturnal oxygen saturation (%).

19.1 Percentage TST SpO2 > 90% (single night)

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

19.2 Percentage REM SpO2 > 90% (single night)

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

19.3 Percentage NREM SpO2 > 90% (single night)

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

20 Nocturnal TcCO2 (mmHg) Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 3.20

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 20 Nocturnal TcCO2 (mmHg).

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 20 Nocturnal TcCO2 (mmHg).

20.1 TcCO2 during REM (single night)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

20.2 TcCO2 during NREM (single night)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

20.3 Mean change PtCO2 (up to 3 months)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

20.4 Mean change PaCO2 (up to 3 months)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

21 Nocturnal TcCO2(mmHg) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 3.21

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 21 Nocturnal TcCO2(mmHg).

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 21 Nocturnal TcCO2(mmHg).

21.1 Mean change TcCO2 NREM to REM (single night)

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

21.2 Maximum TcCO2 (single night)

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

22 Nocturnal TcCO2 TST (mmHg) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 3.22

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 22 Nocturnal TcCO2 TST (mmHg).

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 22 Nocturnal TcCO2 TST (mmHg).

22.1 Mean PtCO2 TST (up to 3 months)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

22.2 Max PtCO2 TST (up to 3 months)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

23 Hypopneas Show forest plot

1

Relative rate (Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 3.23

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 23 Hypopneas.

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 23 Hypopneas.

23.1 Single night

1

Relative rate (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Open in table viewer
Comparison 4. NIV versus no NIV during exercise testing

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 6 minute walk test Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Analysis 4.1

Comparison 4 NIV versus no NIV during exercise testing, Outcome 1 6 minute walk test.

Comparison 4 NIV versus no NIV during exercise testing, Outcome 1 6 minute walk test.

1.1 Up to 1 week

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 1 CFQ scores.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 1 CFQ scores.

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 2 Fatigue.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 2 Fatigue.

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 3 FEV1 (L).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 3 FEV1 (L).

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 4 FEV1 (% predicted).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 4 FEV1 (% predicted).

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 5 FVC (L).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 5 FVC (L).

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 6 FVC (% predicted).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 6 FVC (% predicted).

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 7 FEF25‐75 (L).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.7

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 7 FEF25‐75 (L).

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 8 FEF25‐75 (% predicted).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.8

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 8 FEF25‐75 (% predicted).

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 9 Respiratory muscle strength PImax (cmH20).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.9

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 9 Respiratory muscle strength PImax (cmH20).

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 10 Respiratory muscle strength PEmax (cmH20).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.10

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 10 Respiratory muscle strength PEmax (cmH20).

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 11 Airway resistance % predicted.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.11

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 11 Airway resistance % predicted.

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 12 LCI.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.12

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 12 LCI.

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 13 Oxygen saturation during airway clearance (%).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.13

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 13 Oxygen saturation during airway clearance (%).

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 14 Oxygen saturation during airway clearance (change in SpO2 % during treatment).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.14

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 14 Oxygen saturation during airway clearance (change in SpO2 % during treatment).

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 15 Oxygen saturation after airway clearance (SpO2).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.15

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 15 Oxygen saturation after airway clearance (SpO2).

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 16 PaCO2.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.16

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 16 PaCO2.

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 17 Breathlessness.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.17

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 17 Breathlessness.

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 18 Sputum wet weight (g).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.18

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 18 Sputum wet weight (g).

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 19 Sputum dry weight (g).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.19

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 19 Sputum dry weight (g).

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 20 Sputum volume per day (VAS score).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.20

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 20 Sputum volume per day (VAS score).

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 21 Pseudomonas density (log CFU/g).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.21

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 21 Pseudomonas density (log CFU/g).

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 22 Exercise capacity: 25 level modified shuttle test (m).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.22

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 22 Exercise capacity: 25 level modified shuttle test (m).

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 23 Energy (VAS score).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.23

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 23 Energy (VAS score).

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 24 6MWT.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.24

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 24 6MWT.

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 25 Length of hospital stay (days).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.25

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 25 Length of hospital stay (days).

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 26 Time to next admission (days).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.26

Comparison 1 NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique), Outcome 26 Time to next admission (days).

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 1 CFQoL chest symptom score.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 1 CFQoL chest symptom score.

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 2 CFQoL transitional dyspnoea index.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 2 CFQoL transitional dyspnoea index.

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 3 Symptoms of sleep‐disordered breathing.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.3

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 3 Symptoms of sleep‐disordered breathing.

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 4 Lung function during sleep.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.4

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 4 Lung function during sleep.

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 5 Respiratory rate (breaths/min).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.5

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 5 Respiratory rate (breaths/min).

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 6 Lung function while awake.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.6

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 6 Lung function while awake.

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 7 Arterial blood gases: pH.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.7

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 7 Arterial blood gases: pH.

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 8 Arterial blood gases: PaO2 (mmHg).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.8

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 8 Arterial blood gases: PaO2 (mmHg).

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 9 Arterial blood gases: PaCO2 (mmHg).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.9

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 9 Arterial blood gases: PaCO2 (mmHg).

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 10 Arterial blood gases: HCO3 (mmol/L).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.10

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 10 Arterial blood gases: HCO3 (mmol/L).

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 11 Arterial blood gases: SaO2 (%).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.11

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 11 Arterial blood gases: SaO2 (%).

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 12 Exercise performance (MSWT) (metres).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.12

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 12 Exercise performance (MSWT) (metres).

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 13 Total sleep time (min).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.13

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 13 Total sleep time (min).

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 14 REM sleep architecture.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.14

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 14 REM sleep architecture.

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 15 Sleep latency (min).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.15

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 15 Sleep latency (min).

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 16 Nocturnal oxygen saturation (%).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.16

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 16 Nocturnal oxygen saturation (%).

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 17 Nocturnal oxygen saturation (%).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.17

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 17 Nocturnal oxygen saturation (%).

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 18 Nocturnal TcCO2 (mmHg.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.18

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 18 Nocturnal TcCO2 (mmHg.

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 19 Nocturnal TcCO2 (mmHg).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.19

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 19 Nocturnal TcCO2 (mmHg).

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 20 Nocturnal TcCO2 TST (mmHg).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.20

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 20 Nocturnal TcCO2 TST (mmHg).

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 21 Hypopneas.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.21

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 21 Hypopneas.

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 22 Mean heart rate (beats/min).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.22

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 22 Mean heart rate (beats/min).

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 23 Respiratory rate.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.23

Comparison 2 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen, Outcome 23 Respiratory rate.

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 1 CF QoL chest symptom score.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 1 CF QoL chest symptom score.

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 2 CF QoL traditional dyspnoea index score.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.2

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 2 CF QoL traditional dyspnoea index score.

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 3 Symptoms of sleep‐disordered breathing.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.3

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 3 Symptoms of sleep‐disordered breathing.

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 4 Lung function during sleep.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.4

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 4 Lung function during sleep.

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 5 Respiratory rate(breaths/min) during sleep.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.5

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 5 Respiratory rate(breaths/min) during sleep.

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 6 Mean Respiratory Rate.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.6

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 6 Mean Respiratory Rate.

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 7 Mean Heart Rate (beats/min).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.7

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 7 Mean Heart Rate (beats/min).

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 8 Lung function while awake.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.8

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 8 Lung function while awake.

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 9 Arterial blood gases: pH.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.9

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 9 Arterial blood gases: pH.

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 10 Arterial blood gases: PaO2 (mmHg).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.10

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 10 Arterial blood gases: PaO2 (mmHg).

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 11 Arterial blood gases: PaCO2 (mmHg).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.11

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 11 Arterial blood gases: PaCO2 (mmHg).

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 12 Arterial blood gases: HCO3 (mmol/L).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.12

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 12 Arterial blood gases: HCO3 (mmol/L).

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 13 Arterial blood gases: SaO2 (%).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.13

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 13 Arterial blood gases: SaO2 (%).

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 14 Exercise performance (metres).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.14

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 14 Exercise performance (metres).

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 15 Total sleep time (min).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.15

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 15 Total sleep time (min).

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 16 REM sleep architecture.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.16

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 16 REM sleep architecture.

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 17 Sleep latency.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.17

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 17 Sleep latency.

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 18 Nocturnal oxygen saturation (%).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.18

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 18 Nocturnal oxygen saturation (%).

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 19 Nocturnal oxygen saturation (%).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.19

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 19 Nocturnal oxygen saturation (%).

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 20 Nocturnal TcCO2 (mmHg).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.20

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 20 Nocturnal TcCO2 (mmHg).

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 21 Nocturnal TcCO2(mmHg).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.21

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 21 Nocturnal TcCO2(mmHg).

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 22 Nocturnal TcCO2 TST (mmHg).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.22

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 22 Nocturnal TcCO2 TST (mmHg).

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 23 Hypopneas.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.23

Comparison 3 NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air, Outcome 23 Hypopneas.

Comparison 4 NIV versus no NIV during exercise testing, Outcome 1 6 minute walk test.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.1

Comparison 4 NIV versus no NIV during exercise testing, Outcome 1 6 minute walk test.

Table 1. List of abbreviations

Abbreviation

Definition

Explanation

6MWT

six minute walk test

ABG

analysis of arterial blood gases

ACBT

active cycle of breathing technique

AHI

apnoea/hypopnoea Index

CF

cystic fibrosis

COPD

chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

CPAP

continuous positive airway pressure

a system that maintains a positive pressure in the circuitry and airways throughout inspiration and expiration

CPT

chest physiotherapy

CSS

chest symptom score

a validated CF quality of life measurement on a scale of 0 (worst) to 100 (best)

ESS

Epworth sleepiness scale

a scale measuring sleepiness ranging from 0 (best) to 24 (worst)

FEF25‐75

flow rate between 25% and 75% of maximal expiration

FEV₁

forced expiratory volume in 1 second

FRC

functional residual capacity

resting volume of the lungs

FVC

forced vital capacity

total volume of air expired during a forced expiration following a full inspiration

Global PSQI

Global score Pittsburgh sleep quality index

sleep quality scale ranging from 0 (best) to 21 (worst)

LCI

lung clearance index

measured by multiple breath washouts; a sensitive measure of ventilation inhomogeneity

MEF50

maximal expiratory flow with 50% of vital capacity remaining in the lung

mmHg

millimetres of mercury

mSpO2

mean oxygen saturation

MSWT

modified shuttle walk test

incremental exercise tolerance test with minimum clinically important difference = 40 m

nadirSpO₂

the largest fall expressed in the absolute value of SpO₂

NIPPV

non‐invasive positive pressure ventilation

NIV

non‐invasive ventilation

NREM

non‐rapid eye movement

a phase during sleep

ODI

oxygen desaturation index

OEP

optoelectronic plethysmography

PaCO₂

partial pressure of carbon dioxide in arterial blood

PaO₂

partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood

PEP

positive expiratory pressure

an airway clearance technique

PSV

pressure support ventilation

QoL

quality of life

RCT

randomised controlled trial

RDI

respiratory disturbance index

RE

respiratory exacerbations

REM

rapid eye movement

a phase during sleep

RR

respiratory rate

SaO₂

saturation of haemoglobin with oxygen in arterial blood

SD

standard deviation

SOB

shortness of breath

SpO2

saturation of haemoglobin with oxygen using pulse oximetry

*SpO2 max

the largest fall expressed as the difference with the SpO2 just before the manoeuvre

*SpO₂ mean

the mean of *SpO₂ max during the whole chest physiotherapy period

SWT

shuttle walk test

TcCO₂

transcutaneous carbon dioxide

TDI

transitional dyspnoea index

a measurement of CF quality of life, scores ranging from ‐9 (worst) to +9 (best); the minimal clinically important difference is 1 unit

TLC

total lung capacity

total volume of air in lungs following a maximum inspiration

TST

total sleep time

TWT

treadmill walking test

VI

minute ventilation

VT

tidal volume

volume air inspired or expired during normal breathing

IPAP

inspiratory positive airway pressure

PImax

inspiratory respiratory muscle strength

PEmax

expiratory respiratory muscle strength

Vab

abdominal volume of the chest wall

variable calculated from OEP

Vrca

abdominal rib cage volume

variable calculated from OEP

Vrcp

pulmonary rib cage volume

variable calculated from OEP

Figuras y tablas -
Table 1. List of abbreviations
Comparison 1. NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 CFQ scores Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

1.1 Physical Domain

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.2 Health Domain

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.3 Respiratory Domain

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 Fatigue Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

3 FEV1 (L) Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

3.1 Up to 1 week (directed cough)

2

86

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.03 [‐0.17, 0.12]

3.2 Up to 1 week (PEP)

1

34

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.05 [‐0.22, 0.12]

4 FEV1 (% predicted) Show forest plot

3

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

4.1 Up to 1 week (directed cough)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.2 Up to 2 weeks (all techniques combined)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.3 Up to 3 months (PEP)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5 FVC (L) Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

5.1 Up to 1 week (directed cough)

2

86

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.00 [‐0.30, 0.30]

5.2 Up to 1 week (PEP)

1

34

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.07 [‐0.47, 0.33]

6 FVC (% predicted) Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

6.1 Up to 1 week (directed cough)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.2 Up to 3 months (PEP)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7 FEF25‐75 (L) Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

7.1 Up to 1 week (directed cough)

2

86

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.00 [‐0.08, 0.07]

7.2 Up to 1 week (PEP)

1

34

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [‐0.07, 0.07]

8 FEF25‐75 (% predicted) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

8.1 Up to 1 week (directed cough)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9 Respiratory muscle strength PImax (cmH20) Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

9.1 Up to 1 week (all techniques combined)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9.2 Up to 2 weeks (all techniques combined)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10 Respiratory muscle strength PEmax (cmH20) Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

10.1 Up to 1 week (all techniques combined)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10.2 Up to 2 weeks (all techniques combined)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11 Airway resistance % predicted Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

11.1 Up to 1 week (all techniques combined)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12 LCI Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

12.1 Up to 3 months (PEP)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

13 Oxygen saturation during airway clearance (%) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

13.1 Up to 1 week (all techniques combined)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

14 Oxygen saturation during airway clearance (change in SpO2 % during treatment) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

14.1 Up to 1 week (all techniques combined)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15 Oxygen saturation after airway clearance (SpO2) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

15.1 Up to 1 week (directed cough)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15.2 Up to 1 week (PEP)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16 PaCO2 Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

16.1 Up to 3 months (PEP)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

17 Breathlessness Show forest plot

2

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

17.1 Up to 1 week (Borg breathlessness score)

1

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

17.2 Up to 2 weeks (VAS score)

1

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

18 Sputum wet weight (g) Show forest plot

3

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

18.1 Up to 1 week (directed cough)

3

118

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.69 [‐3.06, 1.67]

18.2 Up to 1 week (PEP)

1

34

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐2.58 [‐6.11, 0.95]

19 Sputum dry weight (g) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

19.1 Up to 1 week (directed cough)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

19.2 Up to 1 week (PEP)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

20 Sputum volume per day (VAS score) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

20.1 Up to 2 weeks (all techniques combined)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

21 Pseudomonas density (log CFU/g) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

21.1 Up to 2 weeks (all techniques combined)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

22 Exercise capacity: 25 level modified shuttle test (m) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

22.1 Up to 2 weeks (all techniques combined)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

23 Energy (VAS score) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

23.1 Up to 2 weeks (all techniques combined)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

24 6MWT Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

24.1 Up to 3 months (PEP)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

25 Length of hospital stay (days) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

25.1 Up to 2 weeks (all techniques combined)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

26 Time to next admission (days) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. NIV versus no NIV during chest physiotherapy (any technique)
Comparison 2. NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 CFQoL chest symptom score Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

1.1 Up to 3 months

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 CFQoL transitional dyspnoea index Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

2.1 Up to 3 months

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3 Symptoms of sleep‐disordered breathing Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

3.1 Epworth Sleepiness Scale (up to 3 months)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.2 Global PSQI (up to 3 months)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4 Lung function during sleep Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

4.1 VI (L/m) while awake (single night)

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.2 VI (L/m) during REM (single night)

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.3 VI (L/m) during NREM (single night)

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.4 VT (L) while awake (single night)

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.5 VT (L) during REM (single night)

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.6 VT (L) during NREM (single night)

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5 Respiratory rate (breaths/min) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

5.1 RR while awake (single night)

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.2 RR during REM (single night)

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.3 RR during NREM (single night)

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6 Lung function while awake Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

6.1 FEV1% predicted (up to 3 months)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.2 FVC % predicted (up to 3 months)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7 Arterial blood gases: pH Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

7.1 Up to 3 months

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8 Arterial blood gases: PaO2 (mmHg) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

8.1 Up to 3 months

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9 Arterial blood gases: PaCO2 (mmHg) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

9.1 Up to 3 months

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10 Arterial blood gases: HCO3 (mmol/L) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

10.1 Up to 3 months

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11 Arterial blood gases: SaO2 (%) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

11.1 Up to 3 months

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12 Exercise performance (MSWT) (metres) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

12.1 Up to 3 months

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

13 Total sleep time (min) Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

13.1 Single night

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

13.2 Up to 3 months

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

14 REM sleep architecture Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

14.1 REM (single night)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

14.2 REM %TST (single night)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

14.3 REM % TST (up to 3 months)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15 Sleep latency (min) Show forest plot

3

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

15.1 Single night

2

38

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.93 [‐0.32, 6.19]

15.2 Up to 3 months

1

15

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐5.0 [‐19.17, 9.17]

16 Nocturnal oxygen saturation (%) Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

16.1 Mean SpO2 REM (single night)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16.2 Mean SpO2 NREM (single night)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16.3 Mean SpO2 for TST (up to 3 months)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16.4 TST with SpO2 < 90% (up to 3 months)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

17 Nocturnal oxygen saturation (%) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

17.1 Percentage TST SpO2>90%

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

17.2 Percentage REM SpO2>90%

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

17.3 Percentage NREM SpO2>90%

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

18 Nocturnal TcCO2 (mmHg Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

18.1 TcCO2 during REM (single night)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

18.2 TcCO2 during NREM (single night)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

18.3 Mean change PtCO2 (mmHg) (up to 3 months)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

18.4 Mean change PaCO2 (mmHg) (up to 3 months)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

19 Nocturnal TcCO2 (mmHg) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

19.1 Mean change TcCO2 NREM to REM (single night)

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

19.2 Maximum TcCO2 (single night)

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

20 Nocturnal TcCO2 TST (mmHg) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

20.1 Mean PtCO2 TST (up to 3 months)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

20.2 Maximum PtCO2 TST (up to 3 months)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

21 Hypopneas Show forest plot

1

Relative rate (Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

21.1 Single night

1

Relative rate (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

22 Mean heart rate (beats/min) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

22.1 Up to 3 months

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

23 Respiratory rate Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

23.1 Up to 3 months

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 2. NIV in overnight ventilation compared to oxygen
Comparison 3. NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 CF QoL chest symptom score Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

1.1 Up to 3 months

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 CF QoL traditional dyspnoea index score Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

2.1 Up to 3 months

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3 Symptoms of sleep‐disordered breathing Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

3.1 Epworth sleepiness scale (up to 3 months)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.2 Global PSQI (up to 3 months)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4 Lung function during sleep Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

4.1 VI while awake (single night)

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.2 VI during REM (single night)

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.3 VI during NREM (single night)

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.4 VT while awake (single night)

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.5 VT during REM (single night)

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.6 VT during NREM (single night)

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5 Respiratory rate(breaths/min) during sleep Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

5.1 RR while awake (single night)

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.2 RR during REM (single night)

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5.3 RR during NREM (single night)

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6 Mean Respiratory Rate Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

6.1 Up to 3 months

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7 Mean Heart Rate (beats/min) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

7.1 Up to 3 months

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8 Lung function while awake Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

8.1 FEV1% predicted (up to 3 months)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8.2 FVC % predicted (up to 3 months)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9 Arterial blood gases: pH Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

9.1 Up to 3 months

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10 Arterial blood gases: PaO2 (mmHg) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

10.1 Up to 3 months

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

11 Arterial blood gases: PaCO2 (mmHg) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

11.1 Up to 3 months

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12 Arterial blood gases: HCO3 (mmol/L) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

12.1 Up to 3 months

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

13 Arterial blood gases: SaO2 (%) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

13.1 Up to 3 months

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

14 Exercise performance (metres) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

14.1 Up to 3 months

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15 Total sleep time (min) Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

15.1 Single night

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15.2 Up to 3 months

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16 REM sleep architecture Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

16.1 REM (single night)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16.2 REM %TST (single night)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16.3 REM % TST (up to 3 months)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

17 Sleep latency Show forest plot

3

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

17.1 Single night

2

38

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐2.63 [‐7.37, 2.11]

17.2 At 6 weeks

1

15

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐3.00 [‐19.88, 13.88]

18 Nocturnal oxygen saturation (%) Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

18.1 Mean SpO2 REM (single night)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

18.2 Mean SpO2 NREM (single night)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

18.3 Mean SpO2 for TST (up to 3 months)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

18.4 TST for SpO2 < 90% (up to 3 months)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

19 Nocturnal oxygen saturation (%) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

19.1 Percentage TST SpO2 > 90% (single night)

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

19.2 Percentage REM SpO2 > 90% (single night)

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

19.3 Percentage NREM SpO2 > 90% (single night)

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

20 Nocturnal TcCO2 (mmHg) Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

20.1 TcCO2 during REM (single night)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

20.2 TcCO2 during NREM (single night)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

20.3 Mean change PtCO2 (up to 3 months)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

20.4 Mean change PaCO2 (up to 3 months)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

21 Nocturnal TcCO2(mmHg) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

21.1 Mean change TcCO2 NREM to REM (single night)

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

21.2 Maximum TcCO2 (single night)

1

Mean Difference (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

22 Nocturnal TcCO2 TST (mmHg) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

22.1 Mean PtCO2 TST (up to 3 months)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

22.2 Max PtCO2 TST (up to 3 months)

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

23 Hypopneas Show forest plot

1

Relative rate (Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

23.1 Single night

1

Relative rate (Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 3. NIV in overnight ventilation compared to room air
Comparison 4. NIV versus no NIV during exercise testing

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 6 minute walk test Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

1.1 Up to 1 week

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 4. NIV versus no NIV during exercise testing