Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Medical day hospital care for the elderly versus alternative forms of care

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001730.pub2Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 08 octubre 2008see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Práctica y organización sanitaria efectivas

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2010 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Anne Forster

    Correspondencia a: Academic Unit of Elderly Care and Rehabilitation, University of Leeds, Bradford, UK

    [email protected]

  • John Young

    Academic Unit of Elderly Care and Rehabilitation, University of Leeds, Bradford, UK

  • Ruth Lambley

    Academic Unit of Elderly Care and Rehabilitation, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK

  • Peter Langhorne

    Academic Section of Geriatric Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK

Contributions of authors

AF, JY and PL planned and initiated the review, assessed trials, drafted the final report and were guarantors of the initial review.

AF oversaw literature searching and PL provided methodological support.

For this update, AF, RL conducted literature searching and screened all titles. AF, JY and RL assessed trials for inclusion.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK.

  • University of Glasgow, UK.

External sources

  • Northern and Yorkshire Region NHS Executive, UK.

  • Department of Health Cochrane Review Incentive Scheme 2007, UK.

Declarations of interest

None

Acknowledgements

The day hospital group is formed from the authors of this systematic review and the authors of the original trials. We are very pleased to acknowledge the help and support given by the day hospital trialists who provided additional information about trial procedures and data and are members of the day hospital group. They are as follows, S Burch, J Longbottom, M Mackay, C Borland, T Prevost (Burch 1999); Kaisu Pitkala (Pitkala 1991); John Gladman (Gladman 1993); Susan Hedrick, ML Rothman, MK Chapko, JL Ehreth, P Diehr, TS Inui, RT Connis, PL Grover, JR Kelly (Hedrick 1993); E Hui, C Lum, RLC Kay, J Woo, KH Or (Hui 1995); N Vetter (Vetter 1989).

Victor Cummings, Joan Eagle and SJ Ogle also expressed support for the review. Dr Jonathan Baskett provided additional information and Dr TK Kong identified a relevant trial.

We thank Pat Spoor and colleagues, University of Leeds for undertaking the comprehensive literature searches.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2015 Jun 23

Medical day hospital care for older people versus alternative forms of care

Review

Lesley Brown, Anne Forster, John Young, Tom Crocker, Alex Benham, Peter Langhorne, Day Hospital Group

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001730.pub3

2008 Oct 08

Medical day hospital care for the elderly versus alternative forms of care

Review

Anne Forster, John Young, Ruth Lambley, Peter Langhorne

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001730.pub2

1999 Jul 26

Medical day hospital care for the elderly versus alternative forms of care

Review

Anne Forster, John Young, Peter Langhorne, G roup Day Hospital

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001730

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.