Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Dosis única de paracetamol oral (acetaminofeno), con y sin codeína, para el dolor postoperatorio en adultos

Contraer todo Desplegar todo

Referencias

References to studies included in this review

Bentley 1987 {published data only}

Bentley KC, Head TW. The additive analgesic efficacy of acetaminophen, 1000 mg, and codeine, 60 mg, in dental pain. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 1987;42(6):634‐40. CENTRAL

Bjune 1996 {published data only}

Bjune K, Stubhaug A, Dodgson MS, Breivik H. Additive analgesic effect of codeine and paracetamol can be detected in strong, but not moderate, pain after Caesarean section. Baseline pain‐intensity is a determinant of assay‐sensitivity in a postoperative analgesic trial. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 1996;40(4):399‐407. CENTRAL

Bourne 2005 {published data only}

Bourne MH, Rosenthal NR, Xiang J, Jordan D, Kamin M. Tramadol/acetaminophen tablets in the treatment of postsurgical orthopedic pain. The American Journal of Orthopedics 2005;24(12):592‐7. CENTRAL

Breivik 1999 {published data only}

Breivik EK, Barkvoll P, Skovlund E. Combining diclofenac with acetaminophen or acetaminophen‐codeine after oral surgery: A randomized, double‐blind single‐dose study. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 1999;66(6):625‐35. CENTRAL

Chang 2001 {published data only}

Chang DJ, Fricke JR, Bird SR, Bohidar NR, Dobbins TW, Geba GP. Rofecoxib versus codeine/acetaminophen in postoperative dental pain: a double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐ and active comparator‐controlled clinical trial. Clinical Therapeutics 2001;23(9):1446‐55. CENTRAL

Chang 2005 {published data only}

Chang DJ, Bird SR, Bohidar NR, King T. Analgesic efficacy of rofecoxib compared with codeine/acetaminophen using a model of acute dental pain. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontology 2005;100(4):e74‐80. [DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.04.026]CENTRAL

Cooper 1981 {published data only}

Cooper SA, Breen JF, Giuliani RL. The relative efficacy of indoprofen compared with opioid analgesic combinations. Journal of Oral Surgery 1981;39(1):21‐5. CENTRAL

Cooper 1988 {published data only}

Cooper SA, Firestein A, Cohn P. Double blind comparison of meclofenamate sodium with acetaminophen, acetaminophen with codeine and placebo for relief of postsurgical dental pain. The Journal of Clinical Dentistry 1988;1(2):31‐4. CENTRAL

Cooper 1991 {published data only}

Cooper SA, Kupperman A. The analgesic efficacy of flurbiprofen compared to acetaminophen with codeine. The Journal of Clinical Dentistry 1991;2(3):70‐4. CENTRAL

Desjardins 1986 {published data only}

Desjardins PJ, Cooper SA, Finizio T. Efficacy of low dose combination analgesics: acetaminophen/codeine, aspirin/butalbital/caffeine/codeine, and placebo in oral surgery pain. Anesthesia Progress 1986;33(3):143‐6. CENTRAL

Dionne 1994 {published data only}

Dionne RA, Snyder J, Hargreaves KM. Analgesic efficacy of flurbiprofen in comparison with acetaminophen, acetaminophen plus codeine, and placebo after impacted third molar removal. Journal of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery 1994;52(9):919‐24. CENTRAL

Forbes 1982 {published data only}

Forbes JA, Beaver WT, White EH, White RW, Neilson GB, Shackleford RW. Diflunisal. A new oral analgesic with an unusually long duration of action. The Journal of the American Medical Association 1982;248(17):2139‐42. CENTRAL

Forbes 1983 {published data only}

Forbes JA, Kolodny AL, Beaver WT, Shackleford RW, Scarlett VR. A 12 hour evaluation of the analgesic efficacy of diflunisal, acetaminophen, and acetaminophen codeine combination, and placebo in postoperative pain. Pharmacotherapy 1983;3(2 Pt 2):47S‐54S. CENTRAL

Forbes 1986 {published data only}

Forbes JA, Jones KF, Smith WK, Gongloff CM. Analgesic effect of an aspirin codeine butalbital caffeine combination and an acetaminophen codeine combination in postoperative oral surgery pain. Pharmacotherapy 1986;6(5):240‐7. CENTRAL

Forbes 1989 {published data only}

Forbes JA, Butterworth GA, Burchfield WH, Yorio CC, Selinger LR, Rosenmertz SK, et al. Evaluation of flurbiprofen, acetaminophen, an acetaminophen‐codeine combination, and placebo in postoperative oral surgery pain. Pharmacotherapy 1989;9(5):322‐30. CENTRAL

Forbes 1990a {published data only}

Forbes JA, Butterworth GA, Burchfield WH, Beaver WT. Evaluation of ketorolac, aspirin, and an acetaminophen‐codeine combination in postoperative oral surgery pain. Pharmacotherapy 1990;10(6 Pt 2):77S‐93S. CENTRAL

Forbes 1990b {published data only}

Forbes JA, Kehm CJ, Grodin CD, Beaver WT. Evaluation of ketorolac, ibuprofen, acetaminophen, and an acetaminophen codeine combination in postoperative oral surgery pain. Pharmacotherapy 1990;10(6 Pt 2):94S‐105S. CENTRAL

Forbes 1994 {published data only}

Forbes JA, Bates JA, Edquist IA, Burchfield WH, Smith FG, Schwartz MK, et al. Evaluation of two opioid‐acetaminophen combinations and placebo in postoperative oral surgery pain. Pharmacotherapy 1994;14(2):139‐46. CENTRAL

Gertzbein 1986 {published data only}

Gertzbein SD, Tile M, McMurty RY, Kellam JF, Hunter GA, Keith RG, et al. Analysis of the analgesic efficacy of acetaminophen 1000 mg, codeine phosphate 60 mg, and the combination of acetaminophen 1000 mg and codeine phosphate 60 mg in the relief of postoperative pain. Pharmacotherapy 1986;6(3):104‐7. CENTRAL

Heidrich 1985 {published data only}

Heidrich G, Slavic Svircev V, Kaiko RF. Efficacy and quality of ibuprofen and acetaminophen plus codeine analgesia. Pain 1985;22(4):385‐97. CENTRAL

Honig 1984 {published data only}

Honig S, Murray KA. An appraisal of codeine as an analgesic: single dose analysis. The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 1984;24(2‐3):96‐102. CENTRAL

Malmstrom 2004 {published data only}

Malmstrom K, Kotey P, Coughlin H, Desjardins PJ. A randomized, double‐blind, parallel‐group study comparing the analgesic effect of etoricoxib to placebo, naproxen sodium, and acetaminophen with codeine using the dental impaction pain model. The Clinical Journal of Pain 2004;20(3):147‐55. CENTRAL

Pande 1996c {published data only}

Pande AC, Pyke RE, Greiner M, Cooper SA, Benjamin R, Pierce MW. Analgesic efficacy of the K‐receptor agonist, Enadoline, in dental surgery pain. Clinical Neuropharmacology 1996;19(1):92‐7. CENTRAL

Smith 2004 {published data only}

Smith AB, Ravikumar TS, Kamin M, Jordan D, Xiang J, Capss‐ Study Group, et al. Combination tramadol plus acetaminophen for postsurgical pain. American Journal of Surgery 2004;187(4):521‐7. CENTRAL

Stubhaug 1995 {published data only}

Stubhaug A, Grimstad J, Breivik H. Lack of analgesic effect of 50 mg and 100 mg oral tramadol after orthopaedic surgery: a randomized, double‐blind, placebo and standard active drug comparison. Pain 1995;62(1):111‐8. CENTRAL

Sunshine 1986 {published data only}

Sunshine A, Marrero I, Olson N, McCormick N, Laska EM. Comparative study of flurbiprofen, zomepirac sodium, acetaminophen plus codeine, and acetaminophen for the relief of postsurgical dental pain. The American Journal of Medicine 1986;80(3A):50‐4. CENTRAL

Turek 1988 {published data only}

Turek MD, Baird WM. Double blind parallel comparison of ketoprofen (Orudis), acetaminophen plus codeine, and placebo in postoperative pain. The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 1988;28(12 Suppl):S23‐8. CENTRAL

Ziccardi 2000 {published data only}

Ziccardi VB, Desjardins PJ, Daly‐DeJoy E, Seng GF. Single‐dose vicoprofen compared with acetaminophen with codeine and placebo in patients with acute postoperative pain after third molar extractions. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons 2000;58(6):622‐8. CENTRAL

References to studies excluded from this review

Becker 1990 {published data only}

Becker J, Beckmann J, Bertelt C, Gundert‐Remy U, Rohmel J, Ohlendorf D. Double blind biometric study on postoperative effects of analgesics [Doppelblindstudie uber postoperative analgetikawirkungen]. Deutsche  Zahnarztliche Zeitschrift 1990;45(1):36‐8. CENTRAL

Behotas 1992 {published data only}

Behotas S, Chauvin A, Castiel J, Martin A, Boureau F, Barrat J, Lienhart A. Analgesic efficacy of ibuprofen for post‐episiotomy pain [Effets antalgiques de L'ibuprofene dans les doulers apres episiotomie]. Annales Françaises d'Anesthèsie et de Rèanimation 1992;11(1):22‐6. CENTRAL

Chung 2004 {published data only}

Chung F, Tong D, Miceli PC, Reiz J, Harsanyi Z, Darke AC, Payne LW. Controlled‐release codeine is equivalent to acetaminophen plus codeine for post‐cholecystectomy analgesia. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2004;51(3):216‐21. CENTRAL

Cooper 1984 {published data only}

Cooper SA. Five studies on ibuprofen for postsurgical dental pain. The American Journal of Medicine 1984;Suppl:70‐7. CENTRAL

De los Santos 1998 {published data only}

De los Santos AR, MartÌ MI, Espinosa D, Di Girolamo G, Vinacur JC, Casadei A. Lysine clonixinate vs. paracetamol/codeine in postepisiotomy pain. Acta Physiologica, Pharmacologica et Therapeutica Latinoamericana 1998;48(1):52‐8. CENTRAL

Forbes 1981 {published data only}

Forbes JA, Bowser MW, Calderazzo JP, Foor VM. An evaluation of the analgesic efficacy of three opioid‐analgesic combinations in postoperative oral surgery pain. Journal of Oral Surgery 1981;39:108‐12. CENTRAL

Fulkerson 1986 {published data only}

Fulkerson JP, Folcik MA. Analgesia following arthroscopic surgery: comparison of Diflunisal and acetaminophen with codeine. Arthroscopy 1986;2(2):108‐10. CENTRAL

Jacobson 1987 {published data only}

Jacobson J, Bertilson SO. Analgesic efficacy of paracetamol/codeine and paracetamol/dextropropoxyphene in pain after episiotomy and ruptures in connection with childbirth. The Journal of International Medical Research 1987;15(2):89‐95. CENTRAL

Levin 1974 {published data only}

Levin HM, Bare WW, Berry FN, Miller JM. Acetaminophen with codeine for the relief of severe pain in postpartum patients. Current Therapeutic Research 1974;16(9):921‐7. CENTRAL

Maalaki 2002 {published data only}

Maaliki H, Church L. Which is better for the management of postpartum perineal pain: Ibuprofen or acetaminophen with codeine?. The Journal of Family Practice 2002;51(3):207. CENTRAL

Macleod 2002 {published data only}

Macleod AG, Ashford B, Voltz M, Williams B, Cramond T, Gorta L, et al. Paracetamol versus paracetamol‐codeine in the treatment of post‐operative dental pain: a randomized, double‐blind, prospective trial. Australian Dental Journal 2002;47(2):147‐51. CENTRAL

Matthews 1984 {published data only}

Matthews RW, Scully CM, Levers BG. The efficacy of diclofenac sodium (Voltarol) with and without paracetamol in the control of post surgical dental pain. British Dental Journal 1984;157(10):357‐9. CENTRAL

Ottinger 1990 {published data only}

Ottinger ML, Kinney KW, Black JR, Wittenberg M. Comparison of flurbiprofen and acetaminophen with codeine in postoperative foot pain. Journal of the American Podiatry Association 1990;80(5):266‐70. CENTRAL

Oullette 1986 {published data only}

Ouellette RD, Feinberg A, Laraja R, et al. Naproxen sodium vs acetaminophen plus codeine in postsurgical pain. Current Therapeutic Research, Clinical and Experimental 1986;39(5):839‐45. CENTRAL

Pande 1996a {published data only}

Pande AC, Pyke RE, Greiner M, Cooper SA, Benjamin R, Pierce MW. Analgesic efficacy of the kappa‐receptor agonist, enadoline, in dental surgery pain. Clinical Neuropharmacology 1996;19(1):92‐7. CENTRAL

Pande 1996b {published data only}

Pande AC, Pyke RE, Greiner M, Wideman GL, Benjamin R, Pierce MW. Analgesic efficacy of enadoline versus placebo or morphine in postsurgical pain. Clinical Neuropharmacology 1996;19(5):451‐6. CENTRAL

Peter 2001 {published data only}

Peter EA, Janssen PA, Grange CS, Douglas MJ. Ibuprofen versus acetaminophen with codeine for the relief of perineal pain after childbirth: a randomized controlled trial. Canadian Medical Association Journal 2001;165(9):1203‐9. CENTRAL

Petti 1985 {published data only}

Petti A. Postoperative pain relief with pentazocine and acetaminophen: comparison with other analgesic combinations and placebo. Clinical Therapeutics 1985;8(1):126‐33. CENTRAL

Quiding 1982a {published data only}

Quiding H, Persson G, Ahlstrom U, Bangens S, Hellem S, Johansson G, et al. Paracetamol plus supplementary doses of codeine. An analgesic study of repeated doses. The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 1982;23(4):315‐9. CENTRAL

Quiding 1983 {published data only}

Quiding H, Haggquist SO. Visual analogue scale and the analysis of analgesic action. The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 1983;24(4):475‐8. CENTRAL

Quiding 1984 {published data only}

Quiding H, Oikarinen V, Sane J, Sjoblad AM. Analgesic efficacy after single and repeated doses of codeine and acetaminophen. The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 1984 Jan;24(1):27‐34. CENTRAL

Raeder 2001 {published data only}

Raeder JC, Steine S, Vatsgar TT. Oral ibuprofen versus paracetamol plus codeine for analgesia after ambulatory surgery. Anesthesia and Analgesia 2001;92(6):1470‐2. CENTRAL

Scoren 1987 {published data only}

Scoren RD, Corn H, Rhodes P, Schwarz M, Segal PL, Marks MH. Pain following periodontal surgery treatment with a nonnarcotic analgesic compared with two codeine combinations. Current Therapeutic Research, Clinical and Experimental 1987;42(3):463‐71. CENTRAL

Skjelbred 1977 {published data only}

Skjelbred P, Album B, Lokken P. Acetylsalicylic acid vs paracetamol: effects on postoperative course. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 1977;12(4):257‐64. CENTRAL

Sunshine 1988 {published data only}

Sunshine A, Olson NZ. Analgesic efficacy of ketoprofen in postpartum, general surgery, and chronic cancer pain. The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 1988;28:S47‐S54. CENTRAL

Sveen 1975 {published data only}

Sveen K, Gilhuus MoeO. Paracetamol/codeine in relieving pain following removal of impacted mandibular third molars. International Journal of Oral Surgery 1975;4(6):258‐66. CENTRAL

Torabinejad 1994 {published data only}

Torabinejad M, Dorn SO, Eleazer PD, Frankson M, Jouhari B, Mullin RK, et al. Effectiveness of various medications on postoperative pain following root canal obturation. Journal of Endodontics 1994;20(9):427‐31. CENTRAL

Vangen 1988 {published data only}

Vangen O, Doessland S, Lindbaek E. Comparative study of ketorolac and paracetamol/codeine in alleviating pain following gynaecological surgery. The Journal of International Medical Research 1988;16(6):443‐51. CENTRAL

Wittenberg 1984 {published data only}

Wittenberg M, Kinney KW, Black JR. Comparison of ibuprofen and acetaminophen codeine in postoperative foot pain. Journal of the American Podiatry Association 1984;74(5):233‐7. CENTRAL

Botting 2000

RM Botting. Mechanism of action of acetaminophen: is there a cyclooxygenase 3?. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2000;31(5):S203‐S210.

Chandrasekharan 2002

NV Chandrasekharan. COX‐3, a cyclooxygenase‐1 variant inhibited by acetaminophen and other analgesic/antipyretic drugs: cloning, structure and expression. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2002;99:13926‐13931.

Clarke in press

Clarke R, Derry S, Moore RA, McQuay HJ. Single dose oral etoricoxib for acute postoperative pain in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews In press.

Collins 1997

Collins SL, Moore RA, McQuay HJ. The visual analogue pain intensity scale: what is moderate pain in millimetres?. Pain 1997;72:95‐7.

Collins 1999

Collins SL, Moore RA, McQuay HJ, Wiffen PJ, Edwards JE. Single dose oral ibuprofen and diclofenac for postoperative pain. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 1999, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001548]

Collins 2001

Collins SL, Edwards J, Moore RA, Smith L, McQuay HJ. Seeking a simple measure of analgesia for mega trials: is simple global assessment good enough?. Pain 2001;91:189‐94.

Cook 1995

Cook RJ, Sackett DL. The number needed to treat: a clinically useful measure of treatment effect. British Medical Journal 1995;310:452‐4.

CSM 1997

Committee on Safety of Medicines. Medicines Control Agency. Paracetamol and aspirin. Current pproblems in Pharmacovigilance 1997;23:9.

Dart 2000

Dart RC, Kuffner EK, Rumack BH. Treatment of pain or fever with paracetamol (acetaminophen) in the alcoholic patient: a systematic review. The American Journal of Medicine 2000;7(2):123‐34.

Derry 2008

Derry S, Barden J, McQuay HJ, Moore RA. Single dose oral celecoxib for postoperative pain. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2008, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004233]

Edwards 1999

Edwards JE, McQuay HJ, Moore RA, Collins SL. Reporting of adverse effects in clinical trials should be improved: lessons from acute postoperative pain. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 1999;18(6):427‐37. [DOI: doi:10.1016/S0885‐3924(99)00093‐7]

Edwards 2002

Edwards JE, McQuay HJ, Moore RA. Combination analgesic efficacy: individual patient data meta‐analysis of single‐dose oral tramadol plus acetaminophen in acute postoperative pain. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 2002;23(2):121–130. [DOI: 10.1016/S0885‐3924(01)00404‐3]

Flower 1972

RJ Flower, JR Vane. Inhibition of prostaglandin synthetase in brain explains the anti‐pyretic activity of paracetamol (4‐acetamidophenol). Nature 1972;240:410‐411.

Graham 2005

Graham GG, Scott KF. Mechanism of action of paracetamol. American Journal of Therapeutics 2005;12(1):46‐55.

Gunnell 1997

D Gunnell, K Hawton, V Garnier, C Bismuth, J Fagg. Use of paracetamol for suicide and non‐fatal poisoning in the UK and France: are restrictions on availability justified?. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 1997;51:175‐9.

Hawkins 2007

Hawkins LC, Edwards JN, Dargan PI. Impact of restricting paracetamol pack sizes on paracetamol poisoning in the United Kingdom: a review of the literature. Drug Safety 2007;30(6):465‐79.

Hawton 2001

K Hawton, E Townsend, J Deeks, L Appleby, D Gunnell, O Bennewith, J Cooper. Effects of legislation restricting pack sizes of paracetamol and salicylate on self poisoning in the United Kingdom: before and after study. BMJ 2001;322:1‐7.

Hinz 2008

Hinz B, Cheremina O, Brune K. Acetaminophen (paracetamol) is a selective cyclooxygenase‐2 inhibitor in man. FASEB J 2008;22(2):383‐90.

Jadad 1996a

Jadad AR, Carroll D, Moore A, McQuay H. Developing a database of published reports of randomised clinical trials in pain research. Pain 1996;66:239‐46.

Jadad 1996b

Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJM, Gavaghan DJ, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?. Controlled Clinical Trials 1996;17:1‐12.

L'Abbé 1987

L'Abbé KA, Detsky AS, O'Rourke K. Meta‐analysis in clinical research. Annals of Internal Medicine 1987;107:224‐33.

McQuay 1996

McQuay H, Carroll D, Moore A. Variation in the placebo effect in randomised controlled trials of analgesics: all is as blind as it seems. Pain 1996;64(2):331‐5. [DOI: 10.1016/0304‐3959(95)00116‐6]

McQuay 2005

McQuay HJ, Moore RA. Placebo. Postgraduate Medical Journal 2005;81:155‐60.

Moher 1999

Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, Olkin I, Rennie D, Stroup DF. Improving the quality of reports of meta‐analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of Reporting of Meta‐analyses. Lancet 1999;27(354):1896‐900.

Moore 1996

Moore A, McQuay H, Gavaghan D. Deriving dichotomous outcome measures from continuous data in randomised controlled trials of analgesics. Pain 1996;66(2‐3):229‐37.

Moore 1997a

Moore A, McQuay H, Gavaghan D. Deriving dichotomous outcome measures from continuous data in randomised controlled trials of analgesics: Verification from independent data. Pain 1997;69(1‐2):127‐30.

Moore 1997b

Moore A, Moore O, McQuay H, Gavaghan D. Deriving dichotomous outcome measures from continuous data in randomised controlled trials of analgesics: Use of pain intensity and visual analogue scales. Pain 1997;69(3):311‐5.

Moore 1998b

Moore RA, Gavaghan D, Tramèr MR, Collins SL, McQuay HJ. Size is everything‐‐large amounts of information are needed to overcome random effects in estimating direction and magnitude of treatment effects. Pain 1998;78(3):209‐16. [DOI: 10.1016/S0304‐3959(98)00140‐7]

Moore 2003

Moore RA, Edwards J, Barden J, McQuay HJ. Bandolier's Little Book of Pain. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003. [ISBN: 0‐19‐263247‐7]

Moore 2005

Moore RA, Edwards JE, McQuay HJ. Acute pain: individual patient meta‐analysis shows the impact of different ways of analysing and presenting results. Pain 2005;116(3):322‐31.

Moore 2006

Moore A, McQuay H. Bandolier's Little Book of Making Sense of the Medical Evidence. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. [ISBN: 0‐19‐856604‐2]

Moore 2008

Moore RA, Moore OA, Derry S, McQuay HJ. Numbers needed to treat calculated from responder rates give a better indication of efficacy in osteoarthritis trials than mean pain scores. Arthritis Research and Therapy 2008;10(2):R39. [DOI: 10.1186/ar2394]

Morris 1995

Morris JA, Gardner MJ. Calculating confidence intervals for relative risk, odds ratio and standardised ratios and rates. In: Gardner MJ, Altman DG editor(s). Statistics with confidence ‐ confidence intervals and statistical guidelines. London: British Medical Journal, 1995:50‐63.

Oldman 1999

Oldman A, Smith LA, Collins S, Carroll D, Wiffen PJ, McQuay HJ, Rees J, Moore A. Single dose oral aspirin for acute pain. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 1999, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002067]

PIC 2008

Paracetamol Information Centre. www.pharmweb.net Accessed 3 July 2008.

Prescott 2000

LF Prescott. Therapeutic misadventure with paracetamol: Fact or fiction?. American Journal of Therapeutics 2000;7(2):99‐114.

Schwab 2003

JM Schwab, HJ Schluesener, S Laufer. COX‐3: just anothet COX or the solitary elusive target of paracetamol?. The Lancet 2003;361:981‐982.

Straube 2008

Straube S, Derry S, McQuay HJ, Moore RA. Enriched enrolment: definition and effects of enrichment and dose in trials of pregabalin and gabapentin in neuropathic pain. A systematic review. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 2008;66:266‐75. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1365‐2125.2008.03200.x]

Toms 2008

Toms L, McQuay HJ, Derry S, Moore RA. Single dose oral paracetamol (acetaminophen) for postoperative pain in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2008, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004602.pub2]

Tramèr 1997

Tramèr MR, Reynolds DJM, Moore RA, McQuay HJ. Impact of covert duplicate publication on meta‐analysis: a case study. BMJ 1997;315:635‐40.

References to other published versions of this review

Moore 1997

Moore A, Collins S, Carroll D, McQuay H. Paracetamol with and without codeine in acute pain: a quantitative systematic review. Pain 1997;70:193‐201.

Moore 1998a

Moore A, Collins S, Carroll D, McQuay H, Edwards J. Single dose paracetamol (acetaminophen), with and without codeine, for postoperative pain. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 1998, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001547]

Characteristics of studies

Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]

Bentley 1987

Methods

RCT, single oral dose, 4 parallel groups

Medication administered when baseline pain reached a moderate to severe intensity

Pain assessed at baseline the hourly to 4 hours

Participants

Impacted third molar extraction

Mean age mid 20's

N = 128

Interventions

Paracetamol+codeine 1000/60 mg, n = 41

Paracetamol 1000 mg, n = 41

Codeine 60 mg, n = 21

Placebo, n = 17

Outcomes

PI: non std 10 point scale

PR: std 5 point scale

Time to use of rescue medication

Number of patients using rescue medication

Number of patients reporting any adverse event

Notes

Oxford Quality Score: R1, DB1, W1

Bjune 1996

Methods

RCT, DB, single oral dose, 3 parallel groups

Medication administered when baseline pain reached a moderate (more than 40 mm on 100 mm VAS) to severe (greater than 60 mm on a std 100 mm VAS) intensity

Pain assessed at 0, 30, 60 minutes then hourly to 6 hours

Participants

Caesarean section

Age: 27 ‐ 37 years

N = 125

Interventions

Paracetamol+codeine 800/60 mg, n = 50

Paracetamol 1000 mg, n = 50

Placebo, n = 25

Outcomes

PI: std 4 point scale and std 100 mm VAS ("no pain" to "unbearable pain")

PR: std 5 point scale

Number of patients reporting any adverse event and serious adverse events

Notes

Oxford Quality Score: R1, DB2, W1

Patients asked to refrain from rescue medication for 1 hour

Bourne 2005

Methods

RCT, DB single oral dose, 3 parallel groups

Medication administered when baseline pain reached a moderate to severe intensity

Pain assessed at 0, 30, 60 minutes the hourly to 4 hours. Multiple dose phase continued after initial 4 hours

Participants

Orthopaedic surgery

Mean age 46 years

N = 153

M = 83, F = 70

Interventions

Paracetamol+codeine 300/30 mg, n = 55

Paracetamol+tramadol 325/37.5 mg, n = 49

Placebo, n = 49

Outcomes

PI: std 4 point scale

PR: non std 6 point scale

Number of patients using rescue medication

Number of patients withdrawing due to adverse event

Notes

Oxford Quality Score: R2, DB2, W1

Breivik 1999

Methods

RCT, DB single oral dose, dummy, 5 parallel groups

Medication administered when baseline pain reached a moderate to severe intensity

Pain assessed at baseline the every 30 minutes to 8 hours

Participants

Impacted third molar extraction

Mean age 25 years

N = 120

M = 44, F = 76

Interventions

Paracetamol+codeine 1000/60 mg, n = 24

Paracetamol 1000 mg, n = 22

Diclofenac 100 mg, n = 22

Paracetamol+diclofenac 1000/100 mg, n = 24

Paracetamol+diclofenac+codeine 1000/100/60 mg, n = 24

Outcomes

PI: std 100 mm VAS

PR: std 5 point scale

PGE: non std 4 point scale

Number of patients using rescue medication

Number of patients reporting any adverse event and serious adverse events

Number of patients withdrawing due to adverse event

Notes

Oxford Quality Score: R2, DB2, W1

Chang 2001

Methods

RCT, DB single oral dose, 3 parallel groups

Medication administered when baseline pain reached a moderate to severe intensity

Pain assessed at 0, 30, 60 minutes then hourly to 6 hours

Participants

Impacted third molar extraction

Mean age 21 years

N = 292

M = 122, F = 371

Interventions

Paracetamol+codeine 600/60 mg, n = 180

Rofecoxib 50mg, n = 182

Placebo, n = 31

Outcomes

PI: std 4 point scale

PR: std 5 point scale

PGE: std 5 point scale (patients reporting "very good" or "excellent")

Time to use of rescue medication

Number of patients reporting any adverse event and serious adverse events

Number of patients withdrawing due to adverse event

Notes

Oxford Quality Score: R1, DB2, W1

Chang 2005

Methods

RCT, DB, single oral dose, 3 parallel groups

Medication administered when baseline pain reached a moderate to severe intensity

Pain assessed at: 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 24 hours

Participants

Impacted third molar extraction

Mean age 19 years
N = 390

Interventions

Paracetamol+codeine 600/60 mg, n = 180

Rofecoxib 50 mg, n = 180

Placebo, n = 30

Outcomes

PI: std 4 point scale

PR: std 5 point scale

PGE: std 5 pt scale (patients reporting "very good" or "excellent")

Time to use of rescue medication

Number of patients using rescue medication

Number of patients reporting any adverse event and serious adverse events

Number of patients withdrawing due to adverse event

Notes

Oxford Quality Score: R1, DB2, W1

Patients asked to refrain from rescue medication for 1.5 hours

Cooper 1981

Methods

RCT, DB, single oral dose, 5 parallel groups

Medication administered when baseline pain reached a moderate to severe intensity

Pain assessed at baseline then hourly to 4 hours

Participants

Impacted third molar extraction

Mean age early 20s

N = 248

Interventions

Paracetamol 650 mg, n = 37

Paracetamol+codeine 650/60 mg, n = 42

Paracetamol+d‐propoxyphene 650/100 mg, n = 42

Ibuprofen 200 mg, n = 42

Placebo, n = 37

Outcomes

PI: std 4 point scale

PR: std 5 point scale

PGE: std 5 pt scale (patients reporting "very good" or "excellent")

Time to use of rescue medication

Number of patients using rescue medication

Number of patients reporting any adverse event and serious adverse events

Number of patients withdrawing due to adverse event

Notes

Oxford Quality Score R1, DB2, W1

Patients asked to refrain from rescue medication for 1 hour

Cooper 1988

Methods

RCT, DB, single oral dose, 5 parallel groups

Medication administered when baseline pain reached a moderate to severe intensity

Pain assessed at baseline then hourly to 4 hours

Participants

Impacted third molar extraction

Age 18‐57 years

N =165

Interventions

Paracetamol 600 mg, n = 36

Paracetamol+codeine 600/60 mg, n = 31

Placebo, n = 40

Outcomes

PI: std 4 point scale

PR: std 5 point scale

PGE: std 5 point scale (patients reporting "very good" or "excellent")

Number of patients using rescue medication

Number of patients withdrawing due to adverse event

Notes

Oxford Quality Score R1, DB2, W1

Patients asked to refrain from rescue medication for 1 hour

Cooper 1991

Methods

RCT, DB, single oral dose, 6 parallel groups

Medication administered when baseline pain reached a moderate to severe intensity

Pain assessed at 0, 30, 60 minutes then hourly to 6 hours

Participants

Impacted tooth removal

Age "young adults'

n=247

Interventions

Paracetamol 650 mg, n = 37

Paracetamol+codeine 650/60 mg, n = 39

Zomepirac 100 mg, n = 23

Flurbiprofen 50 mg, n = 42

Flurbiprofen 100 mg, n = 41

Placebo, n = 44

Outcomes

PI: std 4 point scale

PR: std 5 point scale

PGE: std 5 point scale (patients reporting "very good" or "excellent")

Time to use of rescue medication

Number of patients using rescue medication

Number of patients reporting any adverse event and serious adverse events

Number of patients withdrawing due to adverse event

Notes

Oxford Quality Score R1, DB1, W1

Patients asked to refrain from rescue medication for 1 hour

Desjardins 1986

Methods

RCT, DB, single oral dose, 3 parallel groups

Medication administered when baseline pain reached a moderate to severe intensity

Pain assessed at 0, 30, 60 minutes, then hourly to 6 hours

Participants

Oral Surgery

Age 18+ years

N = 137

Interventions

Paracetamol+codeine 300/30 mg, n = 39

Aspirin+butalbital+caffeine+codeine 325/50/40/30 mg, n = 43

Placebo, n = 41

Outcomes

PI: std 4 point scale

PR: std 5 point scale

Time to use of rescue medication

Number of patients reporting any adverse event and serious adverse events

Number of patients withdrawing due to adverse event

Notes

Oxford Quality Score: R1, DB2, W1

 Patients asked to refrain from rescue medication for 1 hour

Dionne 1994

Methods

RCT, DB, single oral dose, 5 parallel groups

Medication administered when baseline pain reached moderate to severe intensity

Pain assessed at baseline then hourly to 6 hours

Participants

Impacted third molar removal
Age 16+ years

N = 135

Interventions

Paracetamol 500 mg, n = 72

Piroxicam 20 mg, n = 76

Piroxicam cyclodextrin =20 mg, n = 74

Placebo, n = 76

Outcomes

PI: std 4 point scale

PR: std 5 point scale

Number of patients using rescue medication

Number of patients reporting any adverse event and serious adverse events

Number of patients withdrawing due to adverse event

Notes

Oxford Quality Score R1, DB1, W1

Forbes 1982

Methods

RCT, DB, single oral dose, 5 parallel groups

Medication administered when baseline pain reached a moderate to severe intensity

Pain assessed at baseline then hourly to 12 hours

Participants

Impacted third molar removal

Age 15+ years

N = 177

Interventions

Paracetamol 600 mg, n = 34

Paracetamol+codeine 600/60 mg, n = 31

Diflusinal 500 mg, n = 32

Diflusinal 1000 mg, n = 32

Placebo, n = 30

Outcomes

PI: std 4 point scale

PR: std 5 point scale

PGE: std 5 point scale (patients reporting "very good" or "excellent")

Time to use of rescue medication

Number of patients using rescue medication

Number of patients reporting any adverse event and serious adverse events

Number of patients withdrawing due to adverse event

Notes

Oxford Quality Score R1, DB2, W1

Patients asked to refrain from rescue medication for 2 hours

Forbes 1983

Methods

RCT, DB, single oral dose, 5 parallel groups

Medication administered when baseline pain reached a moderate to severe intensity

Pain assessed at 0, 30, 60 ,90, 120 mins then hourly to 12 hours

Participants

General, gynaecological or orthopaedic surgery

Age 19+ years

N = 132

Interventions

Paracetamol+codeine 600/60 mg, n = 26

Paracetamol 600 mg, n = 26

Diflusinal 500 mg, n = 26

Diflusinal 1000 mg, n = 28

Placebo, n = 26

Outcomes

PI: std 4 point scale

PR: std 5 point scale

PGE: std 5 point scale (patients reporting "very good" or "excellent")

Time to use of rescue medication

Number of patients using rescue medication

Number of patients reporting any adverse event and serious adverse events

Number of patients withdrawing due to adverse event

Notes

Oxford Quality Score R2, DB2, W1

Patients asked to refrain from rescue medication for 1 hour

Forbes 1986

Methods

RCT, DB, single oral dose, 3 parallel groups

Medication administered when baseline pain reached a moderate to severe intensity

Pain assessed at baseline the hourly to 6 hours

Participants

Removal of impacted 3rd molar

Age 15+ years

N = 146

Interventions

Paracetamol+codeine 300/30 mg, n = 43

Aspirin+butalbital+caffeine+codeine 325/50/40/15 mg, n = 41

Placebo, n = 38

Outcomes

PI: std 4 point scale

PR: std 5 point scale

PGE: std 5 point scale (patients reporting "very good" or "excellent")

Time to use of rescue medication

Number of patients reporting any adverse event and serious adverse events

Number of patients withdrawing due to adverse event

Notes

Oxford Quality Score: R2, DB2, W1

Patients asked to refrain from rescue medication for 1 hour

Forbes 1989

Methods

RCT, DB, single oral dose, 4 parallel groups

Medication administered when baseline pain reached a moderate to severe intensity

Pain assessed at baseline then hourly to 12 hours

Participants

Impacted third molar removal

Age 15+ years

N = 107

Interventions

Paracetamol 600 mg, n = 22

Paracetamol+codeine 600/60 mg, n = 17

Flurbiprofen 100 mg, n = 26

Placebo, n = 23

Outcomes

PI: std 4 point scale

PR: std 5 point scale

PGE: std 5 point scale (patients reporting "very good" or "excellent")

Time to use of rescue medication

Number of patients using rescue medication

Number of patients reporting any adverse event and serious adverse events

Number of patients withdrawing due to adverse event

Notes

Oxford Quality Score R2, DB2, W1

Patients asked to refrain from rescue medication for 2 hours

Forbes 1990a

Methods

RCT, DB, single oral dose, 6 parallel groups

Medication administered when baseline pain reached a moderate to severe intensity

Pain assessed at baseline then hourly to 6 hours

Participants

Removal of impacted 3rd molar (1 or more)

Age 15+ years

N = 162

Interventions

Paracetamol+codeine 600/60 mg, n = 27

Aspirin 650 mg, n = 32

Ketorolac 10 mg, n = 37

Placebo, n = 32

Outcomes

PI: std 4 point scale

PR: std 5 point scale

PGE: std 5 point scale (patients reporting "very good" or "excellent")

Time to use of rescue medication

Number of patients using rescue medication

Number of patients reporting any adverse event and serious adverse events

Number of patients withdrawing due to adverse event

Notes

Oxford Quality Score R2, DB2, W1

Patients asked to refrain from rescue medication for 2 hours

Forbes 1990b

Methods

RCT, DB, single oral dose, 6 parallel groups. Followed by multiple dose phase

Medication administered when baseline pain reached a moderate to severe intensity

Pain assessed at baseline then hourly to 6 hours

Participants

Removal of impacted 3rd molar (1 or more)

Age 15+ years

N = 206

Interventions

Paracetamol+codeine 600/60 mg, n = 38

Paracetamol 600 mg, n = 36

Ketorolac 10 mg, n = 31

Ketorolac 20 mg, n = 35

ibuprofen 400 mg, n = 32

Placebo, n = 34

Outcomes

PI: std 4 point scale

PR: std 5 point scale

PGE: std 5 point scale (patients reporting "very good" or "excellent")

Time to use of rescue medication

Number of patients using rescue medication

Number of patients reporting any adverse event and serious adverse events

Number of patients withdrawing due to adverse event

Notes

Oxford Quality Score: R2, DB2, W1

Patients asked to refrain from rescue medication for 2 hours

Forbes 1994

Methods

RCT, DB, single oral dose, 3 parallel groups

Medication administered when baseline pain reached a moderate to severe intensity

Pain assessed at 0, 30, 60 minutes the hourly to 6 hours

Participants

Removal of impacted 3rd molar

Age 15+ years

N = 324

Interventions

Paracetamol+codeine 300/30 mg, n = 93

Paracetamol+hydrocodone bitartrate 500/7.5 mg, n = 94

Placebo, n = 45

Outcomes

PI: std 4 point scale

PR: std 5 point scale

PGE: std 5 point scale (patients reporting "very good" or "excellent")

Time to use of rescue medication

Number of patients using rescue medication

Number of patients reporting any adverse event and serious adverse events

Number of patients withdrawing due to adverse event

Notes

Oxford Quality Score: R2, DB2, W1

Patients asked to refrain from rescue medication for 2 hours

Gertzbein 1986

Methods

RCT, DB, single oral dose, 2 parallel groups

Medication administered when baseline pain reached a moderate to severe intensity

Pain assessed at 0, 30, 60 minutes then hourly to 5 hours

Participants

Elective orthopaedic or general surgery

Age 16 ‐ 65 years

N = 116

Interventions

Paracetamol+codeine 1000/60 mg, n = 45

Paracetamol 1000 mg, n = 45

Outcomes

PI: std 4 point scale and std 100mm VAS

PR: std 5 point scale

PGE: non std 4 point scale

Time to use of rescue medication

Number of patients reporting any adverse event and serious adverse events

Number of patients withdrawing due to adverse event

Notes

Oxford Quality Score: R1, DB1, W1

Patients asked to refrain from rescue medication for 1 hour

Heidrich 1985

Methods

RCT, DB, single oral dose, 3 parallel groups

Medication administered when baseline pain reached a moderate to severe intensity

Pain assessed at 0, 30, 60 minutes then hourly to 6 hours

Participants

Orthopaedic surgery

Age 18‐65 years

N = 120

Interventions

Paracetamol+codeine 300/30 mg, n = 40

Ibuprofen 400 mg, n = 40

Placebo, n = 40

Outcomes

PI: std 4 point scale

PR: std 5 point scale

PGE: std 5 point scale (patients reporting "very good" or "excellent")

Time to use of rescue medication

Number of patients using rescue medication

Number of patients reporting any adverse event

Notes

Oxford Quality Score: R1, DB1, W0

Honig 1984

Methods

RCT, DB, single oral dose, 4 parallel groups

Medication administered when baseline pain reached a moderate to severe intensity

Pain assessed at 0, 30, 60 mins then hourly to 6 hours

Participants

Elective abdominal, orthopaedic, rectal, thoracic and vascular surgery

Age 19‐87 years

N = 116

Interventions

Paracetamol 600 mg, n = 28

Paracetamol+codeine 600/60 mg, n = 28

Codeine 60 mg, n = 28

Placebo, n = 25

Outcomes

PI: std 4 point scale

PR: std 5 point scale

PGE: std 5 point scale (patients reporting "very good" or "excellent")

Number of patients using rescue medication

Number of serious adverse events

Notes

Oxford Quality Score R1, DB2, W0

Malmstrom 2004

Methods

RCT, DB, single oral dose, 3 parallel groups

Medication administered when baseline pain reached a moderate to severe intensity

Pain assessed at 0, 30, 60, 90, 120 minutes, then hourly to 8 hours, then at 10, 12, 20 and 24 hours

Participants

Impacted third molar removal

Mean age 23 years

N = 201

M = 97, F = 104

Interventions

Paracetamol+codeine 600/60 mg, n = 50

Naproxen sodium 550mg, n = 50

Etoricoxib 120mg, n = 50

Placebo, n = 50

Outcomes

PI: std 4 point scale

PR: std 5 point scale

PGE: std 5 point scale (patients reporting "very good" or "excellent")

Time to use of rescue medication

Number of patients using rescue medication

Number of patients reporting any adverse event and serious adverse events

Number of patients withdrawing due to adverse event

Notes

Oxford Quality Score:R2, DB2, W1

Pande 1996c

Methods

RCT, DB, single oral dose, 4 parallel groups

Medication administered when baseline pain reached a moderate to severe intensity

Pain assessed at 0, 30, 60 minutes, the hourly to 6 hours

Participants

Removal of impacted third molar

N = 100

Interventions

Paracetamol+codeine 600/60 mg, n = 23

Placebo, n = 26

Outcomes

PI: std 4 point scale

PR: std 5 point scale

Notes

Oxford Quality Score: R1, DB2, W1

Patients asked to refrain from rescue medication for 1 hour

Smith 2004

Methods

RCT, DB single oral dose, 3 parallel groups

Medication administered when baseline pain reached a moderate to severe intensity

Pain assessed at 0, 30, 60 minutes then hourly to 4 hours

Participants

Orthopaedic surgery

Mean age 47 years

N = 305

M = 215, F = 90

Interventions

Paracetamol+codeine 300/30 mg, n = 109

Paracetamol+tramadol 325/37.5 mg, n = 98

Placebo, n = 98

Outcomes

PI: std 4 point scale

PR: non std 6 point scale

Number of patients using rescue medication

Notes

Oxford Quality Score: R2, DB2, W1

Stubhaug 1995

Methods

RCT, DB, single oral dose, 4 parallel groups

Baseline pain was >60 mm on VAS scale (severe)

Pain assessed at 0, 30, 60 minutes then hourly to 6 hours

Participants

Orthopaedic surgery

Age: Adults

N = 144

Interventions

Paracetamol+codeine 1000/60 mg, n = 36

Tramadol 50 mg, n = 33

Tramadol 100 mg, n = 35

Placebo, n = 33

Outcomes

PI: std 100 mm VAS

Time to use of rescue medication

Number of patients using rescue medication

Number of patients reporting any adverse event and serious adverse events

Notes

Oxford Quality score: R1, DB2, W1

Sunshine 1986

Methods

RCT, DB, single oral dose, 6 parallel groups

Medication administered when baseline pain reached a moderate to severe intensity

Pain assessed at 0, 30, 60 minutes, then hourly to 6 hours

Participants

Removal of impacted third molar

Age 16+ years

N =182

Interventions

Paracetamol 650 mg, n = 30

Paracetamol+codeine 650/60 mg, n = 31

Flurbiprofen 50 mg, n = 31

Flurbiprofen 100 mg, n = 29

Zomepirac 100 mg, n = 31

Placebo, n = 30              

Outcomes

PI: std 4 point scale

PR: std 5 point scale

PGE: std 5 point scale (patients reporting "very good" or "excellent")

Number of patients using rescue medication

Number of patients reporting any adverse event and serious adverse events

Number of patients withdrawing due to adverse event

'Overall improvement': non std 7 point scale

Notes

Oxford Quality Score R2, DB2, W1

Patients asked to refrain from rescue medication for 1 hour

Turek 1988

Methods

RCT, DB, single oral dose, 4 parallel groups

Medication administered when baseline pain reached a moderate to severe intensity

Pain assessed at 0, 30, 60 minutes then hourly to 6 hours

Participants

Elective surgery ‐ mainly orthopaedic, abdominal, gynaecological and urological

Age 18+ years

N = 161

Interventions

Paracetamol+codeine 650/60 mg, n = 39

Ketoprofen 50 mg, n = 41

Ketoprofen 150 mg, n = 39

Placebo, n = 41

Outcomes

PI: std 4 point scale

PR: std 5 point scale

PGE: std 5 point scale (patients reporting "very good" or "excellent")

Time to use of rescue medication

Number of patients using rescue medication

Number of patients reporting any adverse event and serious adverse events

Number of patients withdrawing due to adverse event

Notes

Oxford Quality Score: R1, DB1, W1

Patients asked to refrain from rescue medication for 1 hour

Ziccardi 2000

Methods

RCT, DB, single oral dose, 3 parallel groups

Medication administered when baseline pain reached a moderate to severe intensity

Pain assessed at 0, 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes then hourly to 8 hours

Participants

Impacted third molar extraction

Mean age 25 years

N = 125

M = 50, F = 75

Interventions

Paracetamol+codeine 600/60 mg, n = 49

Ibuprofen+hydrocodone 400/150 mg, n = 49

Placebo, n = 27

Outcomes

PI: std 4 point scale

PR: std 5 point scale

PGE: non std 5 point scale

Time to use of rescue medication

Number of patients reporting any adverse event and serious adverse events

Notes

Oxford Quality Score: R2, DB2, W0

DB: double blind; F: female; M: male; N: total number of participants in study; n: number of participants in treatment arm; R: randomisation RCT: randomised controlled trial; PI: pain intensity; PR: pain relief; PGR: patient global response; std: standard; W: withdrawals

Characteristics of excluded studies [ordered by study ID]

Study

Reason for exclusion

Becker 1990

Pain only assessed for 2 hours after administration of the interventions

Behotas 1992

Interventions were given when pain was "of sufficient intensity that analgesia would normally be given" and data was only presented for pain relief over the first hour

Chung 2004

No appropriate control (Paracetamol with codeine vs codeine CR)

Cooper 1984

Inadequate description of method. Excluded as did not state whether allocation was randomised or if the studies (summary of five trials) were double blind

De los Santos 1998

No appropriate control (Lysine Clonixinate (LC) vs Paracetamol with codeine)

Forbes 1981

Inadequate description of method. Excluded as did not state whether allocation was randomised

Fulkerson 1986

No appropriate control (Diflunisal v paracetamol plus codeine)

Jacobson 1987

No appropriate control (paracetamol plus codeine v paracetamol plus dextropropoxyphene)

Levin 1974

PI scale was 5 point and therefore not validated for the data extraction method. No results for pain relief which would allow the calculation of TOTPAR were presented. Global evaluation was in the opinion of the investigator and not the patient

Maalaki 2002

No appropriate control (Paracetamol with codeine vs. ibuprofen)

Macleod 2002

Insufficient baseline pain (not of moderate or severe intensity, less than 30 mm on 100 mm VAS). No placebo group

Matthews 1984

Intervention administered immediately after surgery before anaesthetic wore off. Therefore inadequate baseline pain

Ottinger 1990

No appropriate control (paracetamol plus codeine v flurbiprofen)

Oullette 1986

No appropriate control (paracetamol plus codeine v naproxen)

Pande 1996a

Fewer than 10 patients in the treatment arm

Pande 1996b

Fewer than 10 patients in the treatment arm

Peter 2001

No appropriate control (ibuprofen vs. paracetamol with codeine)

Petti 1985

Single blind study

Quiding 1982a

Patients instructed to take tablets "when pain relief was needed". Mean baseline pain minus 2 standard deviations was less than 30 mm for all interventions (>30 mm equates to at least moderate pain), therefore it is probable that patients with mild pain were included

Quiding 1983

Patients instructed to take tablets "when pain relief was needed". Mean baseline pain minus 2 standard deviations was less than 30 mm for all interventions (>30 mm equates to at least moderate pain), therefore it is probable that patients with mild pain were included

Quiding 1984

No appropriate control (paracetamol v codeine)

Raeder 2001

No appropriate control (ibuprofen vs paracetamol with codeine)

Scoren 1987

No appropriate control (paracetamol plus codeine v APC v naproxen)

Skjelbred 1977

No appropriate control (paracetamol v aspirin)

Sunshine 1988

Outline of 5 studies. Study 3 and 4 compare paracetamol plus codeine to placebo. Study 4 is a duplicate of an included RCT. Study 3 cannot be included as the report fails to state whether the allocation to each intervention was randomised

Sveen 1975

Intervention administered immediately after surgery before anaesthetic wore off. Therefore inadequate baseline pain

Torabinejad 1994

Intervention administered immediately after surgery before anaesthetic wore off. Therefore inadequate baseline pain

Vangen 1988

No appropriate control (paracetamol plus codeine v ketorolac)

Wittenberg 1984

No appropriate control (paracetamol plus codeine v ibuprofen)

Data and analyses

Open in table viewer
Comparison 1. Paracetamol 800 to 1000 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours Show forest plot

3

192

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

6.34 [2.93, 13.73]

Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Paracetamol 800 to 1000 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus placebo, Outcome 1 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours.

Comparison 1 Paracetamol 800 to 1000 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus placebo, Outcome 1 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours.

2 Participants with any adverse event Show forest plot

3

209

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.89 [0.58, 1.39]

Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Paracetamol 800 to 1000 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus placebo, Outcome 2 Participants with any adverse event.

Comparison 1 Paracetamol 800 to 1000 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus placebo, Outcome 2 Participants with any adverse event.

Open in table viewer
Comparison 2. Paracetamol 800 to 1000 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus paracetamol 1000 mg

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours Show forest plot

4

304

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.31 [1.06, 1.62]

Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Paracetamol 800 to 1000 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus paracetamol 1000 mg, Outcome 1 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours.

Comparison 2 Paracetamol 800 to 1000 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus paracetamol 1000 mg, Outcome 1 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours.

2 Participants using rescue medication over 4 to 6 hours Show forest plot

2

127

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.61 [0.41, 0.89]

Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2 Paracetamol 800 to 1000 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus paracetamol 1000 mg, Outcome 2 Participants using rescue medication over 4 to 6 hours.

Comparison 2 Paracetamol 800 to 1000 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus paracetamol 1000 mg, Outcome 2 Participants using rescue medication over 4 to 6 hours.

3 Participants with any adverse event Show forest plot

4

324

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.13 [0.70, 1.81]

Analysis 2.3

Comparison 2 Paracetamol 800 to 1000 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus paracetamol 1000 mg, Outcome 3 Participants with any adverse event.

Comparison 2 Paracetamol 800 to 1000 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus paracetamol 1000 mg, Outcome 3 Participants with any adverse event.

Open in table viewer
Comparison 3. Paracetamol 600 to 650 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours Show forest plot

17

1413

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.64 [2.17, 3.21]

Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3 Paracetamol 600 to 650 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus placebo, Outcome 1 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours.

Comparison 3 Paracetamol 600 to 650 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus placebo, Outcome 1 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours.

2 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours, dental Show forest plot

14

1221

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.70 [2.18, 3.35]

Analysis 3.2

Comparison 3 Paracetamol 600 to 650 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus placebo, Outcome 2 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours, dental.

Comparison 3 Paracetamol 600 to 650 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus placebo, Outcome 2 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours, dental.

3 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours, other surgery Show forest plot

3

192

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.36 [1.49, 3.73]

Analysis 3.3

Comparison 3 Paracetamol 600 to 650 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus placebo, Outcome 3 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours, other surgery.

Comparison 3 Paracetamol 600 to 650 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus placebo, Outcome 3 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours, other surgery.

4 Participants using rescue medication over 4 to 6 hours Show forest plot

10

657

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.75 [0.68, 0.82]

Analysis 3.4

Comparison 3 Paracetamol 600 to 650 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus placebo, Outcome 4 Participants using rescue medication over 4 to 6 hours.

Comparison 3 Paracetamol 600 to 650 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus placebo, Outcome 4 Participants using rescue medication over 4 to 6 hours.

5 Participants with any adverse event Show forest plot

14

1258

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.57 [1.27, 1.93]

Analysis 3.5

Comparison 3 Paracetamol 600 to 650 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus placebo, Outcome 5 Participants with any adverse event.

Comparison 3 Paracetamol 600 to 650 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus placebo, Outcome 5 Participants with any adverse event.

Open in table viewer
Comparison 4. Paracetamol 600 to 650 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus paracetamol 600‐650 mg

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours Show forest plot

10

622

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.30 [1.11, 1.52]

Analysis 4.1

Comparison 4 Paracetamol 600 to 650 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus paracetamol 600‐650 mg, Outcome 1 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours.

Comparison 4 Paracetamol 600 to 650 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus paracetamol 600‐650 mg, Outcome 1 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours.

2 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours, dental Show forest plot

8

512

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.32 [1.11, 1.57]

Analysis 4.2

Comparison 4 Paracetamol 600 to 650 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus paracetamol 600‐650 mg, Outcome 2 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours, dental.

Comparison 4 Paracetamol 600 to 650 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus paracetamol 600‐650 mg, Outcome 2 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours, dental.

3 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours, other surgery Show forest plot

2

110

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.21 [0.83, 1.77]

Analysis 4.3

Comparison 4 Paracetamol 600 to 650 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus paracetamol 600‐650 mg, Outcome 3 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours, other surgery.

Comparison 4 Paracetamol 600 to 650 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus paracetamol 600‐650 mg, Outcome 3 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours, other surgery.

4 Participants using rescue medication over 4 to 6 hours Show forest plot

7

436

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.75 [0.64, 0.88]

Analysis 4.4

Comparison 4 Paracetamol 600 to 650 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus paracetamol 600‐650 mg, Outcome 4 Participants using rescue medication over 4 to 6 hours.

Comparison 4 Paracetamol 600 to 650 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus paracetamol 600‐650 mg, Outcome 4 Participants using rescue medication over 4 to 6 hours.

5 Participants with any adverse event Show forest plot

7

443

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.11 [0.79, 1.57]

Analysis 4.5

Comparison 4 Paracetamol 600 to 650 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus paracetamol 600‐650 mg, Outcome 5 Participants with any adverse event.

Comparison 4 Paracetamol 600 to 650 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus paracetamol 600‐650 mg, Outcome 5 Participants with any adverse event.

Open in table viewer
Comparison 5. Paracetamol 300 mg plus codeine 30 mg versus placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours Show forest plot

6

690

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.87 [1.42, 2.47]

Analysis 5.1

Comparison 5 Paracetamol 300 mg plus codeine 30 mg versus placebo, Outcome 1 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours.

Comparison 5 Paracetamol 300 mg plus codeine 30 mg versus placebo, Outcome 1 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours.

2 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours, dental Show forest plot

3

299

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.31 [1.76, 6.23]

Analysis 5.2

Comparison 5 Paracetamol 300 mg plus codeine 30 mg versus placebo, Outcome 2 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours, dental.

Comparison 5 Paracetamol 300 mg plus codeine 30 mg versus placebo, Outcome 2 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours, dental.

3 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours, other surgery Show forest plot

3

391

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.51 [1.11, 2.05]

Analysis 5.3

Comparison 5 Paracetamol 300 mg plus codeine 30 mg versus placebo, Outcome 3 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours, other surgery.

Comparison 5 Paracetamol 300 mg plus codeine 30 mg versus placebo, Outcome 3 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours, other surgery.

4 Participants using rescue medication over 4 to 6 hours Show forest plot

4

529

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.79 [0.68, 0.91]

Analysis 5.4

Comparison 5 Paracetamol 300 mg plus codeine 30 mg versus placebo, Outcome 4 Participants using rescue medication over 4 to 6 hours.

Comparison 5 Paracetamol 300 mg plus codeine 30 mg versus placebo, Outcome 4 Participants using rescue medication over 4 to 6 hours.

5 Participants with any adverse event Show forest plot

3

344

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.85 [0.50, 1.45]

Analysis 5.5

Comparison 5 Paracetamol 300 mg plus codeine 30 mg versus placebo, Outcome 5 Participants with any adverse event.

Comparison 5 Paracetamol 300 mg plus codeine 30 mg versus placebo, Outcome 5 Participants with any adverse event.

Open in table viewer
Comparison 6. Sensitivity analysis (paracetamol with codeine versus placebo)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Fewer than 40 patients in active and placebo groups, participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours Show forest plot

10

572

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.01 [2.31, 3.92]

Analysis 6.1

Comparison 6 Sensitivity analysis (paracetamol with codeine versus placebo), Outcome 1 Fewer than 40 patients in active and placebo groups, participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours.

Comparison 6 Sensitivity analysis (paracetamol with codeine versus placebo), Outcome 1 Fewer than 40 patients in active and placebo groups, participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours.

2 More than 40 patients in active and placebo groups, participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours Show forest plot

5

629

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.57 [1.21, 2.03]

Analysis 6.2

Comparison 6 Sensitivity analysis (paracetamol with codeine versus placebo), Outcome 2 More than 40 patients in active and placebo groups, participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours.

Comparison 6 Sensitivity analysis (paracetamol with codeine versus placebo), Outcome 2 More than 40 patients in active and placebo groups, participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours.

Open in table viewer
Comparison 7. Sensitivity analysis (paracetamol with codeine versus paracetamol)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Fewer than 40 patients in active and control groups, Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours Show forest plot

10

588

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.36 [1.15, 1.60]

Analysis 7.1

Comparison 7 Sensitivity analysis (paracetamol with codeine versus paracetamol), Outcome 1 Fewer than 40 patients in active and control groups, Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours.

Comparison 7 Sensitivity analysis (paracetamol with codeine versus paracetamol), Outcome 1 Fewer than 40 patients in active and control groups, Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours.

2 More than 40 patients in active and control groups, Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours Show forest plot

3

259

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.30 [1.02, 1.65]

Analysis 7.2

Comparison 7 Sensitivity analysis (paracetamol with codeine versus paracetamol), Outcome 2 More than 40 patients in active and control groups, Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours.

Comparison 7 Sensitivity analysis (paracetamol with codeine versus paracetamol), Outcome 2 More than 40 patients in active and control groups, Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours.

Open in table viewer
Comparison 8. Paracetamol plus codeine (all doses) versus placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Participants with any adverse event Show forest plot

20

1811

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.37 [1.15, 1.63]

Analysis 8.1

Comparison 8 Paracetamol plus codeine (all doses) versus placebo, Outcome 1 Participants with any adverse event.

Comparison 8 Paracetamol plus codeine (all doses) versus placebo, Outcome 1 Participants with any adverse event.

Open in table viewer
Comparison 9. Paracetamol plus codeine (all doses) versus paracetamol alone

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Participants with any adverse event Show forest plot

11

767

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.10 [0.87, 1.40]

Analysis 9.1

Comparison 9 Paracetamol plus codeine (all doses) versus paracetamol alone, Outcome 1 Participants with any adverse event.

Comparison 9 Paracetamol plus codeine (all doses) versus paracetamol alone, Outcome 1 Participants with any adverse event.

Forest plot of comparison: 3 Paracetamol 800 to 1000 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus placebo, outcome: 1.1 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Forest plot of comparison: 3 Paracetamol 800 to 1000 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus placebo, outcome: 1.1 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours.

Forest plot of comparison: 5 Paracetamol 600 to 650 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus placebo, outcome: 3.1 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

Forest plot of comparison: 5 Paracetamol 600 to 650 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus placebo, outcome: 3.1 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours.

Forest plot of comparison: 7 Paracetamol 300 mg plus codeine 30 mg versus placebo, outcome: 5.1 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 3

Forest plot of comparison: 7 Paracetamol 300 mg plus codeine 30 mg versus placebo, outcome: 5.1 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours.

Forest plot of comparison: 4 Paracetamol 800 to 1000 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus paracetamol 1000 mg, outcome: 2.1 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 4

Forest plot of comparison: 4 Paracetamol 800 to 1000 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus paracetamol 1000 mg, outcome: 2.1 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours.

Forest plot of comparison: 6 Paracetamol 600 to 650 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus paracetamol 600 to 650 mg, outcome: 4.1 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 5

Forest plot of comparison: 6 Paracetamol 600 to 650 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus paracetamol 600 to 650 mg, outcome: 4.1 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours.

Forest plot of comparison: 5 Paracetamol 600 to 650 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus placebo, outcome: 3.4 Participants using rescue medication over 4 to 6 hours.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 6

Forest plot of comparison: 5 Paracetamol 600 to 650 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus placebo, outcome: 3.4 Participants using rescue medication over 4 to 6 hours.

Forest plot of comparison: 7 Paracetamol 300 mg plus codeine 30 mg versus placebo, outcome: 5.4 Participants using rescue medication over 4 to 6 hours.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 7

Forest plot of comparison: 7 Paracetamol 300 mg plus codeine 30 mg versus placebo, outcome: 5.4 Participants using rescue medication over 4 to 6 hours.

Forest plot of comparison: 6 Paracetamol 600 to 650 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus paracetamol 600 to 650 mg, outcome: 4.4 Participants using rescue medication over 4 to 6 hours.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 8

Forest plot of comparison: 6 Paracetamol 600 to 650 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus paracetamol 600 to 650 mg, outcome: 4.4 Participants using rescue medication over 4 to 6 hours.

Forest plot of comparison: 8 Paracetamol plus codeine (all doses) versus placebo, outcome: 8.1 Participants with at least one adverse event.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 9

Forest plot of comparison: 8 Paracetamol plus codeine (all doses) versus placebo, outcome: 8.1 Participants with at least one adverse event.

Forest plot of comparison: 5 Paracetamol 600 to 650 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus placebo, outcome: 3.5 Participants with any adverse event.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 10

Forest plot of comparison: 5 Paracetamol 600 to 650 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus placebo, outcome: 3.5 Participants with any adverse event.

Forest plot of comparison: 9 Paracetamol plus codeine (all doses) versus paracetamol alone, outcome: 9.1 Participants with any adverse event.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 11

Forest plot of comparison: 9 Paracetamol plus codeine (all doses) versus paracetamol alone, outcome: 9.1 Participants with any adverse event.

Comparison 1 Paracetamol 800 to 1000 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus placebo, Outcome 1 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Paracetamol 800 to 1000 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus placebo, Outcome 1 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours.

Comparison 1 Paracetamol 800 to 1000 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus placebo, Outcome 2 Participants with any adverse event.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Paracetamol 800 to 1000 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus placebo, Outcome 2 Participants with any adverse event.

Comparison 2 Paracetamol 800 to 1000 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus paracetamol 1000 mg, Outcome 1 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Paracetamol 800 to 1000 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus paracetamol 1000 mg, Outcome 1 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours.

Comparison 2 Paracetamol 800 to 1000 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus paracetamol 1000 mg, Outcome 2 Participants using rescue medication over 4 to 6 hours.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2 Paracetamol 800 to 1000 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus paracetamol 1000 mg, Outcome 2 Participants using rescue medication over 4 to 6 hours.

Comparison 2 Paracetamol 800 to 1000 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus paracetamol 1000 mg, Outcome 3 Participants with any adverse event.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.3

Comparison 2 Paracetamol 800 to 1000 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus paracetamol 1000 mg, Outcome 3 Participants with any adverse event.

Comparison 3 Paracetamol 600 to 650 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus placebo, Outcome 1 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3 Paracetamol 600 to 650 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus placebo, Outcome 1 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours.

Comparison 3 Paracetamol 600 to 650 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus placebo, Outcome 2 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours, dental.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.2

Comparison 3 Paracetamol 600 to 650 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus placebo, Outcome 2 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours, dental.

Comparison 3 Paracetamol 600 to 650 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus placebo, Outcome 3 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours, other surgery.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.3

Comparison 3 Paracetamol 600 to 650 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus placebo, Outcome 3 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours, other surgery.

Comparison 3 Paracetamol 600 to 650 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus placebo, Outcome 4 Participants using rescue medication over 4 to 6 hours.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.4

Comparison 3 Paracetamol 600 to 650 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus placebo, Outcome 4 Participants using rescue medication over 4 to 6 hours.

Comparison 3 Paracetamol 600 to 650 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus placebo, Outcome 5 Participants with any adverse event.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 3.5

Comparison 3 Paracetamol 600 to 650 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus placebo, Outcome 5 Participants with any adverse event.

Comparison 4 Paracetamol 600 to 650 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus paracetamol 600‐650 mg, Outcome 1 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.1

Comparison 4 Paracetamol 600 to 650 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus paracetamol 600‐650 mg, Outcome 1 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours.

Comparison 4 Paracetamol 600 to 650 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus paracetamol 600‐650 mg, Outcome 2 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours, dental.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.2

Comparison 4 Paracetamol 600 to 650 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus paracetamol 600‐650 mg, Outcome 2 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours, dental.

Comparison 4 Paracetamol 600 to 650 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus paracetamol 600‐650 mg, Outcome 3 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours, other surgery.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.3

Comparison 4 Paracetamol 600 to 650 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus paracetamol 600‐650 mg, Outcome 3 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours, other surgery.

Comparison 4 Paracetamol 600 to 650 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus paracetamol 600‐650 mg, Outcome 4 Participants using rescue medication over 4 to 6 hours.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.4

Comparison 4 Paracetamol 600 to 650 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus paracetamol 600‐650 mg, Outcome 4 Participants using rescue medication over 4 to 6 hours.

Comparison 4 Paracetamol 600 to 650 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus paracetamol 600‐650 mg, Outcome 5 Participants with any adverse event.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.5

Comparison 4 Paracetamol 600 to 650 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus paracetamol 600‐650 mg, Outcome 5 Participants with any adverse event.

Comparison 5 Paracetamol 300 mg plus codeine 30 mg versus placebo, Outcome 1 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.1

Comparison 5 Paracetamol 300 mg plus codeine 30 mg versus placebo, Outcome 1 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours.

Comparison 5 Paracetamol 300 mg plus codeine 30 mg versus placebo, Outcome 2 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours, dental.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.2

Comparison 5 Paracetamol 300 mg plus codeine 30 mg versus placebo, Outcome 2 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours, dental.

Comparison 5 Paracetamol 300 mg plus codeine 30 mg versus placebo, Outcome 3 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours, other surgery.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.3

Comparison 5 Paracetamol 300 mg plus codeine 30 mg versus placebo, Outcome 3 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours, other surgery.

Comparison 5 Paracetamol 300 mg plus codeine 30 mg versus placebo, Outcome 4 Participants using rescue medication over 4 to 6 hours.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.4

Comparison 5 Paracetamol 300 mg plus codeine 30 mg versus placebo, Outcome 4 Participants using rescue medication over 4 to 6 hours.

Comparison 5 Paracetamol 300 mg plus codeine 30 mg versus placebo, Outcome 5 Participants with any adverse event.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.5

Comparison 5 Paracetamol 300 mg plus codeine 30 mg versus placebo, Outcome 5 Participants with any adverse event.

Comparison 6 Sensitivity analysis (paracetamol with codeine versus placebo), Outcome 1 Fewer than 40 patients in active and placebo groups, participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.1

Comparison 6 Sensitivity analysis (paracetamol with codeine versus placebo), Outcome 1 Fewer than 40 patients in active and placebo groups, participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours.

Comparison 6 Sensitivity analysis (paracetamol with codeine versus placebo), Outcome 2 More than 40 patients in active and placebo groups, participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 6.2

Comparison 6 Sensitivity analysis (paracetamol with codeine versus placebo), Outcome 2 More than 40 patients in active and placebo groups, participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours.

Comparison 7 Sensitivity analysis (paracetamol with codeine versus paracetamol), Outcome 1 Fewer than 40 patients in active and control groups, Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.1

Comparison 7 Sensitivity analysis (paracetamol with codeine versus paracetamol), Outcome 1 Fewer than 40 patients in active and control groups, Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours.

Comparison 7 Sensitivity analysis (paracetamol with codeine versus paracetamol), Outcome 2 More than 40 patients in active and control groups, Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 7.2

Comparison 7 Sensitivity analysis (paracetamol with codeine versus paracetamol), Outcome 2 More than 40 patients in active and control groups, Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours.

Comparison 8 Paracetamol plus codeine (all doses) versus placebo, Outcome 1 Participants with any adverse event.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 8.1

Comparison 8 Paracetamol plus codeine (all doses) versus placebo, Outcome 1 Participants with any adverse event.

Comparison 9 Paracetamol plus codeine (all doses) versus paracetamol alone, Outcome 1 Participants with any adverse event.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 9.1

Comparison 9 Paracetamol plus codeine (all doses) versus paracetamol alone, Outcome 1 Participants with any adverse event.

Table 1. Summary of outcomes ‐ analgesia and use of rescue medication

Analgesia

Rescue medication

Study ID

Treatment

PI or PR

Number with 50% PR

PGE: v good or excellent

Median time to use (hr)

Number using

Bentley 1987

(1) Paracetamol+codeine 1000/60 mg, n=41

(2) Paracetamol 1000 mg, n=41

(3) Codeine 60 mg, n=21

(4) Placebo, n=17

TOTPAR 5:

(1) 11.5

(2) 8.7

(4) 4.9

(1) 27/41

(2) 19/41

(4) 4/17

No data

(1) 4.1

(2) 3.3

(4) 1.4

at 4 hr:

(1) 44

(2) 68

(4) 81

Bjune 1996

(1) Paracetamol+codeine 800/60 mg, n=50

(2) Paracetamol 1000 mg, n=50

(3) Placebo, n=25

TOTPAR 6:

severe pain

(1) 10.5

(2) 6.4

(3) 0

moderate pain

(1) 6.5

(2) 8.0

(3) 1.5

(1) 16/44

(2) 12/43

(3) 0/21

No usable data

No data

No data

Bourne 2005

(1) Paracetamol+codeine 300/30 mg, n=55

(2) Paracetamol+tramadol 325/37.5 mg, n=49

(3) Placebo, n=49

SPID 4:

(1) 2.8

(3) 2.1

Baseline PI:

(1) 2.1

(2) 2.2

(1) 24/55

(3) 15/49

No usable data

No data

at 4 hr:

(1) 18

(3) 37

Breivik 1999

(1) Paracetamol+codeine 1000/60 mg n=24

(2) Paracetamol 1000 mg, n=22

(3) Diclofenac 100 mg, n=22

(4) Paracetamol+diclofenac 1000/100 mg, n=24

(5) Paracetamol+diclofenac+codeine 1000/100/60 mg, n=24

TOTPAR 6:

(1) 15.5

(2) 12.1

(1) 17/23

(2) 12/22

No data

No data

at 6 hr:

(1) 17

(2) 38

Chang 2001

(1) Paracetamol+codeine 600/60 mg n=180

(2) Rofecoxib 50mg n=182

(3) Placebo n=31

TOTPAR 6:

(1) 7.0

(3) 3.4

(1) 49/180

(3) 2/31

(1) 27/180

(3) 0/31

(1) 2.3

(3) 1.6

No data

Chang 2005

(1) Paracetamol+codeine 600/60 mg n=180

(2) Rofecoxib 50 mg n=180

(3) Placebo n=30

TOTPAR 6:

(1) 10.7

(3) 6.7

(1) 86/180

(3) 8/30

(1) 123/180

(3) 3/30

(1) 6.5

(3) 3.2

at 24 hr:

(1) 86

(3) 73

Cooper 1981

(1) Paracetamol+codeine 650/60 mg, n=42

(2) Paracetamol 650 mg, n=37

(3) Paracetamol+d‐propoxyphene 650/100 mg, n=42

(4) Ibuprofen 200 mg, n=42

(5) Placebo, n=37

TOTPAR 4:

(1) 8.4

(2) 8.2

(5) 3.4

(1) 24/42

(2) 21/37

(5) 6/37

No usable data

Mean:

(1) 3.1

(2) 3.5

(5) 2.9

at 4 hr:

(1) 12

(2) 5

(5) 54

Cooper 1988

(1) Paracetamol+codeine 600/60 mg, n=31

(2) Paracetamol 600 mg, n=36

(3) Meclofenamate Na 100 mg, n=36

(2) Placebo, n=40

TOTPAR 6:

(1) 12.0

(2) 8.0

(4) 6.3

(1) 17/31

(2) 12/36

(4) 9/40

(1) 15/31

(2) 12/36

(4) 8/40

No data

at 6 hr:

(1) 58

(2) 78

(4) 82

Cooper 1991

(1) Paracetamol+codeine 650/60 mg, n=39

(2) Paracetamol 650 mg, n=37

(3) Zomepirac 100 mg, n=23

(4) Flurbiprofen 50 mg, n=42

(5) Flurbiprofen 100 mg, n=41

(6) Placebo, n=44

TOTPAR 6:

(1) 10.1

(2) 6.8

(6) 5.7

(1) 17/39

(2) 10/37

(6) 9/44

(1) 14/39

(2) 3/37

(6) 2/44

Mean:

(1) 3.5

(2) 3.2

(6) 3.1

at 6 hr:

(1) 80

(2) 95

(6) 84

Desjardins 1986

(1) Paracetamol+codeine 300/30 mg, n=39

(2) Aspirin+butalbital+caffeine+codeine 325/50/40/30 mg, n=43

(3) Placebo, n=41

TOTPAR 6:

(1) 7.8

(3) 5.1

(1) 12/39

(3) 7/41

No usable data

Mean:

(1) 3.4

(3) 3.0

No data

Dionne 1994

(1) Paracetamol+codeine 650/60 mg, n=24

(2) Paracetamol 650 mg, n=27

(3) Flurbiprofen 50 mg, n=25

(4) Flurbiprofen 100 mg, n=22

(5) Placebo, n=25

TOTPAR 6:

(1) 16.9

(2) 18.4

(5) 14.9

(1) 20/24

(2) 24/27

(5) 18/25

No usable data

No data

No data

Forbes 1982

(1) Paracetamol+codeine 600/60 mg, n=31

(2) Paracetamol 600 mg, n=34

(3) Diflusinal 500 mg, n=32

(4) Diflusinal 1000 mg, n=32

(5) Placebo, n=30

TOTPAR 4:

(1) 9.7

(2) 8.9

(5) 3.8

(1) 21/31

(2) 15/34

(5) 6/30

No usable data

(1) 5.3

(2) 3.5

(5) 2.4

at 6 hr:

(1) 56

(2) 70

(5) 82

Forbes 1983

(1) Paracetamol+codeine 600/60 mg, n=26

(2) Paracetamol 600 mg, n=26

(3) Diflusinal 500 mg, n=26

(4) Diflusinal 1000 mg, n=28

(5) Placebo, n=26

TOTPAR 6:

(1) 13.5

(2) 11.2

(5) 5.4

(1) 16/26

(2) 13/26

(5) 5/26

No usable data

(1) 5.3

(2) 4.0

(5) 2.4

at 6 hr:

(1) 63

(2) 73

(5) 86

Forbes 1986

(1) Paracetamol+codeine 300/30 mg, n=43

(2) Aspirin+butalbital+caffeine+codeine 325/50/40/15 mg, n=41

(3) Placebo, n=38

TOTPAR 6:

(1) 7.4

(3) 2.4

(1) 13/43

(2) 1/38

No usable data

Mean:

(1) 4.5

(2) 3.0

No data

Forbes 1989

(1) Paracetamol+codeine 600/60 mg, n=17

(2) Paracetamol 600 mg, n=22

(3) Flurbiprofen 100 mg, n=26

(4) Placebo, n=23

TOTPAR 6:

(1) 10.5

(2) 4.5

(3) 2.0

(1) 8/17

(2) 1/22

(4) 0/23

No usable data

(1) 5.1

(2) 2.8

(4) 1.7

at 6 hr:

(1) 64

(2) 82

(4) 91

Forbes 1990a

(1) Paracetamol+codeine 600/60 mg, n=27

(2) Aspirin 650 mg, n=32

(3) Ketorolac 10 mg, n=37

(4) Placebo, n=32

TOTPAR 6:

(1) 8.6

(4) 2.9

(1) 9/27

(4) 1/32

No usable data

Mean:

(1) 4.3

(4) 3.1

at 6 hr:

(1) 85

(4) 84

Forbes 1990b

(1) Paracetamol+codeine 600/60 mg, n=38

(2) Paracetamol 600 mg, n=36

(3) Ketorolac 10 mg, n=31

(4) Ketorolac 20 mg, n=35

(5) ibuprofen 400 mg, n=32

(6) Placebo, n=34

TOTPAR 6:

(1) 6.2

(2) 5.8

(6) 1.9

(1) 9/38

(2) 7/36

(6) 0/34

No usable data

(1) 2.6

(2) 3.0

(6) 1.8

at 6 hr:

(1) 82

(2) 81

(6) 97

Forbes 1994

(1) Paracetamol+codeine 300/30 mg, n=93

(2) Paracetamol+hydrocodone bitartrate 500/7.5 mg, n=94

(3) Placebo, n=45

TOTPAR 6:

(1) 6.6

(3) 3.4

(1) 23/93

(3) 3/45

No usable data

Mean:

(1) 3.9

(3) 3.4

at 6 hr:

(1) 77

(3) 87

Gertzbein 1986

(1) Paracetamol+codeine 1000/60 mg, n=45

(2) Paracetamol 1000 mg, n=45

TOTPAR 5:

(1) 11.5

(2) 10.2

(1) 30/45

(2) 25/45

No usable data

Mean:

(1) 3.8

(2) 3.6

No data

Heidrich 1985

(1) Paracetamol+codeine 300/30 mg, n=40

(2) Ibuprofen 400 mg, n=40

(3) Placebo, n=40

TOTPAR 6:

(1) 5.5

(3) 3.3

(1) 8/40

(3) 3/40

No data

Mean:

(1) 4.7

(3) 3.5

(1) 85

(3) 90

Honig 1984

(1) Paracetamol+codeine 600/60 mg, n=30

(2) Paracet 600 mg, n=28

(3) Codeine 60 mg, n=28

(4) Placebo, n=30

TOTPAR 6:

(1) 10.6

(2) 8.9

(4) 5.9

(1) 14/30

(2) 11/28

(4) 6/30

(1) 12/30

(2) 8/28

(4) 4/30

No data

at 6 hr:

(1) 33

(2) 43

(4) 53

Malmstrom 2004

(1) Paracetamol+codeine 600/60 mg, n=50

(2) Etoricoxib 120 mg, n=50

(3) Naproxen sodium 550 mg, n=50

(4) Placebo, n=50

TOTPAR 6:

(1) 9.2

(4) 4.2

(1) 20/50

(4) 6/50

at 8 hr:

(1) 24/50

(4) 7/50

(1) 3.6

(4) 1.6

at 24 hr:

(1) 76

(4) 99

Pande 1996a

(1) Paracetamol+codeine 600/60 mg, n=23

(2) Placebo, n=26

SPID 6:

(1) 3.1

(2) 0

Baseline PI: 2.5

(1) 6/23

(2) 0/26

No usable data

No data

No data

Smith 2004

1)Paracetamol+codeine 300/30 mg, n=109

2) Paracetamol+tramadol 325/37.5 mg, n=98

3) Placebo n=98

SPID 4:

(1) 2.7

(3) 2.0

(1) 43/109

(3) 27/98

No usable data

No data

at 4 hr:

(1) 26

(3) 40

Stubhaug 1995

(1) Paracetamol+codeine 1000/60 mg, n=36

(2) Tramadol 50 mg, n=33

(3) Tramadol 100 mg, n=35

(4) Placebo, n=33

VAS SPID 6:

(1) 204

(4) 17

Baseline PI:

(1) 67

(4) 66

(1) 21/36

(4) 1/33

No usable data

(1) >6

(4) 2.8

at 6 hr:

(1) 36

(4) 82

Sunshine 1986

(1) Paracetamol+codeine 650/60 mg, n=31

(2) Paracetamol 650 mg, n=30

(3) Flurbiprofen 50 mg, n=31

(4) Flurbiprofen 100 mg, n=29

(5) Zomepirac 100 mg, n=31

(6) Placebo, n=30

TOTPAR 6:

(1) 13.4

(2) 11.1

(6) 8.3

(1) 19/31

(2) 15/30

(6) 10/30

No usable data

No data

at 6 hr:

(1) 30

(2) 47

(6) 43

Turek 1988

(1) Paracetamol+codeine 650/60 mg, n=39

(2) Ketoprofen 50 mg, n=41

(3) Ketoprofen 150 mg, n=39

(4) Placebo, n=41

TOTPAR 6:

(1) 8.1

(4) 4.6

(1) 14/39

(4) 8/41

No usable data

Mean:

(1) 3.5

(4) 2.2

at 6 hr:

(1) 67

(4) 83

Ziccardi 2000

(1) Paracetamol+codeine 300/30 mg, n=49

(2) Ibuprofen+hydrocodone 200/75 mg, n=49

(3) Placebo, n=27

TOTPAR 6:

(1) 9.8

(3) 3.5

(1) 21/49

(3) 2/27

No usable data

(1) 3.0

(3) 1.0

No data

Figuras y tablas -
Table 1. Summary of outcomes ‐ analgesia and use of rescue medication
Table 2. Summary of outcomes ‐ adverse events and withdrawals

Adverse events

Withdrawals

Study ID

Treatment

Any

Serious

Adverse event

Other

Bentley 1987

(1) Paracetamol+codeine 1000/60 mg, n=41

(2) Paracetamol 1000 mg, n=41

(3) Codeine 60 mg, n=21

(4) Placebo, n=17

(1) 15/42

(2) 21/42

(4) 9/19

No data

None reported

1 pt lost to follow up, 4 had invalid data

Bjune 1996

(1) Paracetamol+codeine 800/60 mg, n=50

(2) Paracetamol 1000 mg, n=50

(3) Placebo, n=25

(1) 10/50

(2) 10/50

(3) 1/25

None

None reported

6 paracetamol+codeine pts, 7 paracetamol pts, 4 placebo pts had invalid data

Bourne 2005

(1) Paracetamol+codeine 300/30 mg, n = 55

(2) Paracetamol+tramadol 325/37.5 mg, n = 49

(3) Placebo, n = 49

No single dose data

No single dose data

No single dose data

None

Breivik 1999

(1) Paracetamol+codeine 1000/60 mg n=24

(2) Paracetamol 1000mg, n=22

(3) Diclofenac 100 mg, n=22

(4) Paracetamol+diclofenac 1000/100 mg, n=24

(5) Paracetamol+diclofenac+codeine 1000/100/60 mg, n=24

(1) 13/23

(2) 3/24

None

None

1 pt in paracetamol+codeine group lost to follow up, 4 pts (2 paracetamol, 2 diclofenac) had invalid data

Chang 2001

(1) Paracetamol+codeine 600/60 mg n=180

(2) Rofecoxib 50 mg n=182

(3) Placebo n=31

At 24 hr:

(1) 83/180

(2) 10/31

None

None

6 pts lost to follow up, 1 para/codeine group vomited medication

Chang 2005

(1) Paracetamol+codeine 600/60 mg n=180

(2) Rofecoxib 50 mg n=180

(3) Placebo n=30

At 24 hr:

(1) 63/180

(3) 14/30

None

None

1 rofecoxib pt lost to follow up

Cooper 1981

(1) Paracet+codeine 650/60 mg, n=42

(2) Paracetamol 650 mg, n=37

(3) Paracetamol+d‐propoxyphene 650/100 mg, n=42

(4) Ibuprofen 200 mg, n=42

(5) Placebo, n=37

(1) 10/42

(2) 12/37

(5) 4/37

None

None

31 pts had invalid data

Cooper 1988

(1) Paracetamol+codeine 600/60 mg, n=31

(2) Paracetamol 600 mg, n=36

(3) Meclofenamate Na 100 mg, n=36

(4) Placebo, n=40

15 pts in total reported adverse events

None

None

11 pts lost to follow up, 3 had invalid data

Cooper 1991

(1) Paracetamol+codeine 650/60 mg, n=39

(2) Paracetamol 650 mg, n=37

(3) Zomepirac 100 mg, n=23

(4) Flurbiprofen 50 mg, n=42

(5) Flurbiprofen 100 mg, n=41

(6) Placebo, n=44

(1) 8/39

(2) 6/37

(6) 7/44

None

None reported

3 lost to follow up, 5 had invalid data

Desjardins 1986

(1) Paracetamol+codeine 300/30 mg, n=39

(2) Aspirin+butalbital+caffeine+codeine 325/50/40/30 mg, n=43

(3) Placebo, n=41

(1) 2/39

(3) 4/41

None

None

14 pts did not medicate, lost to follow up, invalid data

Dionne 1994

(1) Paracetamol+codeine 650/60 mg, n=24

(2) Paracetamol 650 mg, n=27

(3) Flurbiprofen 50 mg, n=25

(4) Flurbiprofen 100 mg, n=22

(5) Placebo, n=25

(1) 9/24

(2) 7/27

(5) 5/25

None

None reported

11 pts had invalid data

Forbes 1982

(1) Paracetamol+codeine 600/60 mg, n=31

(2) Paracetamol 600 mg, n=34

(3) Diflusinal 500 mg, n=32

(4) Diflusinal 1000 mg, n=32

(5) Placebo, n=30

15% in total reported adverse events

None

None

4 pts lost to follow up, 11 had invalid data

Forbes 1983

(1) Paracetamol+codeine 600/60 mg, n=26

(2) Paracetamol 600 mg, n=26

(3) Diflusinal 500 mg, n=26

(4) Diflusinal 1000 mg, n=28

(5) Placebo, n=26

(1) 11/26

(2) 11/26

(5) 4/26

None reported

None

None

Forbes 1986

(1) Paracetamol+codeine 300/30 mg, n=43

(2) Aspirin+butalbital+caffeine+codeine 325/50/40/15 mg, n=41

(3) Placebo, n=38

(1) 6/46

(2) 9/46

None

None

1 pt lost to follow up, 17 had invalid data

Forbes 1989

(1) Paracetamol+codeine 600/60 mg, n=17

(2) Paracetamol 600 mg, n=22

(3) Flurbiprofen 100 mg, n=26

(4) Placebo, n=23

(1) 1/17

(2) 3/26

(4) 2/26

None

None

10 pts had invalid data

Forbes 1990a

(1) Paracetamol+codeine 600/60 mg, n=27

(2) Aspirin 650 mg, n=32

(3) Ketorolac 10 mg, n=37

(4) Placebo, n=32

(1) 9/31

(4) 5/34

None

None

1 lost to follow up, 14 had invalid data

Forbes 1990b

(1) Paracetamol+codeine 600/60 mg, n=38

(2) Paracetamol 600 mg, n=36

(3) Ketorolac 10 mg, n=31

(4) Ketorolac 20 mg, n=35

(5) Ibuprofen 400 mg, n=32

(6) Placebo, n=34

(1) 8/40

(2) 5/41

(6) 0/38

None

None

3 pts lost to follow up, 27 had invalid data

Forbes 1994

(1) Paracetamol+codeine 300/30 mg, n=93

(2) Paracetamol+hydrocodone bitartrate 500/7.5 mg, n=94

(3) Placebo, n=45

(1) 18/107

(3) 10/65

None

None

1 pt lost to follow up, 59 had invalid data

Gertzbein 1986

(1) Paracetamol+codeine 1000/60 mg, n=45

(2) Paracetamol 1000 mg, n=45

(1) 13/47

(2) 13/46

None

None

1 pt withdrew consent, 2 pts had invalid data (2 paracetamol+codeine group, 1 paracetamol group)

Heidrich 1985

(1) Paracetamol+codeine 300/30 mg, n=40

(2) Ibuprofen 400 mg, n=40

(3) Placebo, n=40

No sig diff between groups

No data

None

No data

Honig 1984

(1) Paracetamol+codeine 600/60 mg, n=30

(2) Paracetamol 600 mg, n=28

(3) Codeine 60 mg, n=28

(4) Placebo, n = 30

No data

None reported

None reported

None reported

Malmstrom 2004

(1) Paracetamol+codeine 600/60 mg, n=50

(2) Etoricoxib 120 mg, n=50

(3) Naproxen sodium 550 mg, n=50

(4) Placebo, n=50

Within 10 days:

(1) 25/50

(4) 18/50

None

None

4 pts lost to follow up (2 paracetamol+codeine group, 1 placebo group)

Pande 1996a

(1) Paracetamol+codeine 600/60 mg, n=23

(2) Placebo, n=26

no data

None

None reported

None reported

Smith 2004

(1)Paracetamol+codeine 300/30 mg, n = 109

(2) Paracetamol+tramadol 325/37.5 mg, n = 98

(3) Placebo n = 98

No single dose data

No single dose data

No single dose data

1 pt had invalid data

Stubhaug 1995

(1) Paracetamol+codeine 1000/60 mg, n=36

(2) Tramadol 50 mg, n=33

(3) Tramadol 100 mg, n=35

(4) Placebo, n=33

(1) 10/37

(2) 15/36

None

None reported

7 pts had invalid data

Sunshine 1986

(1) Paracetamol+codeine 650/60 mg, n=31

(2) Paracetamol 650 mg, n=30

(3) Flurbiprofen 50 mg, n=31

(4) Flurbiprofen 100 mg, n=29

(5) Zomepirac 100 mg, n=31

(6) Placebo, n=30

(1) 3/31

(2) 1/30

(6) 1/30

None

None reported

None

Turek 1988

(1) Paracetamol+codeine 650/60 mg, n=39

(2) Ketoprofen 50 mg, n=41

(3) Ketoprofen 150 mg, n=39

(4) Placebo, n=41

(1) 11/39

(4) 4/41

None

None

1 placebo pt had invalid data

Ziccardi 2000

(1) Paracetamol+codeine 300/30 mg, n=49

(2) Ibuprofen+hydrocodone 200/75 mg, n=49

(3) Placebo, n= 27

(1) 21/49

(3) 6/27

None

No data

None reported

Figuras y tablas -
Table 2. Summary of outcomes ‐ adverse events and withdrawals
Comparison 1. Paracetamol 800 to 1000 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours Show forest plot

3

192

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

6.34 [2.93, 13.73]

2 Participants with any adverse event Show forest plot

3

209

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.89 [0.58, 1.39]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Paracetamol 800 to 1000 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus placebo
Comparison 2. Paracetamol 800 to 1000 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus paracetamol 1000 mg

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours Show forest plot

4

304

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.31 [1.06, 1.62]

2 Participants using rescue medication over 4 to 6 hours Show forest plot

2

127

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.61 [0.41, 0.89]

3 Participants with any adverse event Show forest plot

4

324

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.13 [0.70, 1.81]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 2. Paracetamol 800 to 1000 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus paracetamol 1000 mg
Comparison 3. Paracetamol 600 to 650 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours Show forest plot

17

1413

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.64 [2.17, 3.21]

2 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours, dental Show forest plot

14

1221

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.70 [2.18, 3.35]

3 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours, other surgery Show forest plot

3

192

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.36 [1.49, 3.73]

4 Participants using rescue medication over 4 to 6 hours Show forest plot

10

657

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.75 [0.68, 0.82]

5 Participants with any adverse event Show forest plot

14

1258

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.57 [1.27, 1.93]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 3. Paracetamol 600 to 650 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus placebo
Comparison 4. Paracetamol 600 to 650 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus paracetamol 600‐650 mg

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours Show forest plot

10

622

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.30 [1.11, 1.52]

2 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours, dental Show forest plot

8

512

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.32 [1.11, 1.57]

3 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours, other surgery Show forest plot

2

110

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.21 [0.83, 1.77]

4 Participants using rescue medication over 4 to 6 hours Show forest plot

7

436

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.75 [0.64, 0.88]

5 Participants with any adverse event Show forest plot

7

443

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.11 [0.79, 1.57]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 4. Paracetamol 600 to 650 mg plus codeine 60 mg versus paracetamol 600‐650 mg
Comparison 5. Paracetamol 300 mg plus codeine 30 mg versus placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours Show forest plot

6

690

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.87 [1.42, 2.47]

2 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours, dental Show forest plot

3

299

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.31 [1.76, 6.23]

3 Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours, other surgery Show forest plot

3

391

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.51 [1.11, 2.05]

4 Participants using rescue medication over 4 to 6 hours Show forest plot

4

529

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.79 [0.68, 0.91]

5 Participants with any adverse event Show forest plot

3

344

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.85 [0.50, 1.45]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 5. Paracetamol 300 mg plus codeine 30 mg versus placebo
Comparison 6. Sensitivity analysis (paracetamol with codeine versus placebo)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Fewer than 40 patients in active and placebo groups, participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours Show forest plot

10

572

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.01 [2.31, 3.92]

2 More than 40 patients in active and placebo groups, participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours Show forest plot

5

629

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.57 [1.21, 2.03]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 6. Sensitivity analysis (paracetamol with codeine versus placebo)
Comparison 7. Sensitivity analysis (paracetamol with codeine versus paracetamol)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Fewer than 40 patients in active and control groups, Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours Show forest plot

10

588

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.36 [1.15, 1.60]

2 More than 40 patients in active and control groups, Participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours Show forest plot

3

259

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.30 [1.02, 1.65]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 7. Sensitivity analysis (paracetamol with codeine versus paracetamol)
Comparison 8. Paracetamol plus codeine (all doses) versus placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Participants with any adverse event Show forest plot

20

1811

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.37 [1.15, 1.63]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 8. Paracetamol plus codeine (all doses) versus placebo
Comparison 9. Paracetamol plus codeine (all doses) versus paracetamol alone

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Participants with any adverse event Show forest plot

11

767

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.10 [0.87, 1.40]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 9. Paracetamol plus codeine (all doses) versus paracetamol alone