Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Antibióticos para la rotura prematura de membranas

Contraer todo Desplegar todo

Referencias

References to studies included in this review

Amon 1988a {published data only}

Amon E, Lewis S, Sibai BM, Moretti M. Ampicillin prophylaxis in preterm premature rupture of the membranes: a prospective randomized study. Proceedings of 8th Annual Meeting of the Society of Perinatal Obstetricians; 1988 Feb 3‐6; Las Vegas, Nevada, USA. 1988:51.
Amon E, Lewis SV, Sibai BM, Villar MA, Arheart KL. Ampicillin prophylaxis in preterm premature rupture of the membranes: a prospective randomized study. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1988;159:539‐43.

Camli 1997 {published data only}

Camli L, Mavunagacioglu S, Bostanci A, Camli S, Soylu F. Antibiotherapy in preterm premature rupture of membrane. Does it affect the latent period and infectious morbidity?. Jinekoloji Ve Obstetrik Dergisi 1997;11:138‐42.

Christmas 1992 {published data only}

Christmas JT, Cox SM, Andrew W, Dax J, Leveno KJ, Gilstrap LC. Expectant management of preterm ruptured membranes: effects of antimicrobial therapy. Obstetrics & Gynecology 1992;80:759‐62.
Christmas JT, Cox SM, Gilstrap LC, Leveno KJ, Andrews W, Dax J. Expectant management of preterm ruptured membranes: effects of antimicrobial therapy on interval to delivery. Proceedings of 10th Annual Meeting of Society of Perinatal Obstetricians; 1990 Jan 23‐27; Houston, Texas, USA. 1990:19.

Cox 1995 {published data only}

Cox SM, Leveno KJ, Sherman ML, Travis L, De Plama R. Ruptured membranes at 24 to 29 weeks: a randomized double blind trial of antimicrobials versus placebo. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1995;172:412.

Ernest 1994 {published data only}

Ernest JM, Givner LB. A prospective, randomized, placebo‐controlled trial of penicillin in preterm premature rupture of membranes. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1994;170(2):516‐21.

Fuhr 2006 {published data only}

Fuhr NA, Becker C, van Baalen A, Bauer K, Hopp H. Antibiotic therapy for preterm premature rupture of membranes ‐ results of a multicenter study. Journal of Perinatal Medicine 2006;34(3):203‐6.

Garcia‐Burguillo 1995 {published data only}

Garcia‐Burguillo A, Hernandez‐Garcia JM, de la Fuente P. Erythromycin prophylaxis in preterm pregnancies with rupture of amniotic membranes [Profilaxis con eritromicina en gestaciones pretermino con rotura prematura de las membranas amnioticas]. Clinica e Investigacion en Ginecologia y Obstetricia 1995;23(3):96‐100.

Grable 1996 {published data only}

Grable IA, Garcia PM, Perry D, Socol ML. Group B streptococcus and preterm premature rupture of membranes: a randomized, double‐blind clinical trial of antepartum ampicillin. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1996;175:1036‐42.

Johnston 1990 {published data only}

Johnston MM, Sanchez‐Ramos L, Vaughan AJ, Todd MW, Benrubi GI. Antibiotic therapy in preterm premature rupture of membranes: a randomized, prospective, double‐blind trial. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1990;163(3):743‐7.
Sanchez‐Ramos L, Johnston M, Vaughn A, Benrubi GI, Todd M. High dose antibiotic therapy in preterm premature rupture of the membranes: a double blind, randomized, prospective study. Proceedings of 10th Annual Meeting of Society of Perinatal Obstetricians; 1990 Jan 23‐27; Houston, Texas, USA. 1990:18.

Kenyon 2001 {published data only}

Gilbert RE, Pike K, Kenyon SL, Tarnow‐Mordi W, Taylor DJ. The effect of prepartum antibiotics on the type of neonatal bacteraemia: insights from the MRC ORACLE trials. BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 2005;112(6):830‐2.
Jones DR, Pike K, Kenyon S, Pike L, Henderson B, Brocklehurst P, et al. Routine educational outcome measures in health studies: Key Stage 1 in the ORACLE Children Study follow‐up of randomised trial cohorts. Archives of Disease in Childhood 2011;96(1):25‐9.
Kenyon S, Brocklehurst P, Jones D, Marlow N, Salt A, Taylor D. MRC ORACLE children study. Long term outcomes following prescription of antibiotics to pregnant women with either spontaneous preterm labour or preterm rupture of the membranes. BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth 2008;8:14.
Kenyon S, Pike K, Jones DR, Brocklehurst P, Marlow N, Salt A, et al. Childhood outcomes after prescription of antibiotics to pregnant women with preterm rupture of the membranes: 7‐year follow‐up of the ORACLE I trial. Lancet 2008;372(9646):1310‐8.
Kenyon S, Taylor DJ, Tarnow‐Mordi W. ORACLE‐antibiotics for preterm prelabour rupture of the membranes: short and long term outcomes. Acta Paediatrica Supplement 2002;91(437):12‐5.
Kenyon SL, Taylor DJ, Tarnow‐Mordi W, for the ORACLE Collaborative Group. Broad‐spectrum antibiotics for preterm, prelabour rupture of fetal membranes: the ORACLE 1 randomised trial. Lancet 2001;357:979‐88.

Kurki 1992 {published data only}

Kurki T, Hallman M, Zilliacus R, Teramo K, Ylikorkala O. Premature rupture of the membranes; effect of penicillin prophylaxis and long‐term outcome of the children. American Journal of Perinatology 1992;9:11‐6.

Lewis 2003 {published data only}

Lewis DF, Adair CD, Robichaux AG, Jaekle RK, Moore JA, Evans AT, et al. Antibiotic therapy in preterm premature rupture of membranes: are seven days necessary? A preliminary randomized clinical trial. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2003;188(6):1413‐6.

Lockwood 1993a {published data only}

Lockwood CJ, Costigan K, Ghidini A, Wein R, Cetrulo C, Alvarez M, et al. Double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial of piperacillin sodium in preterm membrane rupture. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1993;168(1 Pt 2):378.
Lockwood CJ, Costigan K, Ghidini A, Wein R, Chien D, Brown BL, et al. Double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial of piperacillin prophylaxis in preterm membrane rupture. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1993;169:970‐6.

Magwali 1999 {published data only}

Magwali TL, Cipato T, Majoko F, Rusakaniko S, Mujaji C. Prophylactic augmentin in prelabour preterm rupture of the membranes. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 1999;65:261‐5.

McGregor 1991 {published data only}

McGregor JA, French JI. Double‐blind, randomized, placebo controlled, prospective evaluation of the efficacy of short course erythromycin in prolonging gestation among women with preterm rupture of membranes. Proceedings of 9th Annual Meeting of the Society of Perinatal Obstetricians; 1989 Feb 1‐4; New Orleans, Louisiana, USA. 1989.
McGregor JA, French JI, Seo K. Antimicrobial therapy in preterm premature rupture of membranes: results of a prospective, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial of erythromycin. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1991;165:632‐40.

Mercer 1992 {published data only}

Mercer BM, Moretti ML, Prevost RR, Sibai BM. Erythromycin therapy in preterm premature rupture of the membranes: a prospective, randomized trial of 220 patients. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1992;166:794‐802.

Mercer 1997 {published data only}

Beazley D. Impact of amnionitis and antepartum antibiotic treatment on neonatal outcome after PPROM. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1998;178(1 Pt 2):S15.
Hauth JC. The NICHD‐MFMU antibiotic treatment of PROM study: correlation with acute placental inflammation and prenatal morbidity. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1997;176(1 Pt 2):S53.
Hnat MD, Mercer BM, Thurnau G, Goldenberg R, Thom EA, Meis PJ, et al. Perinatal outcomes in women with preterm rupture of membranes between 24 and 32 weeks of gestation and a history of vaginal bleeding. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2005;193:164‐8.
Mercer B. The NICHD‐MFMU antibiotic treatment of PPROM study: evaluation of factors associated with successful outcome. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1997;176(1 Pt 2):S8.
Mercer B, Miodovnik M, Thurnau G, Goldenberg R, Das A, Merenstein G, et al. A multicentre randomized controlled trial of antibiotic therapy versus placebo therapy after preterm premature rupture of the membranes. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1996;174(1 Pt 2):304.
Mercer BM, Crouse DT, Goldenberg RL, Miodovnik M, Mapp DC, Meis PJ, et al. The antibiotic treatment of PPROM study: systemic maternal and fetal markers and perinatal outcomes. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2012;206(2):145.e1‐9.
Mercer BM, Miodovnik M, Thurnau GR, Goldenberg RL, Das AF, Ramsey RD, et al. Antibiotic therapy for reduction of infant morbidity after preterm premature rupture of the membranes. JAMA 1997;278:989‐95.
Ramsey P. Preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM): latency and neonatal outcome. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2002;187(6 Pt 2):S113.
Thurnau G. The NICHD‐MFMU antibiotic treatment of PROM study: impact of initial amniotic fluid volume on pregnancy outcome. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1997;176(1 Pt 2):S53.

Morales 1989 {published data only}

Morales WJ, Angel JL, Knuppel RA. Comparison of various parameters as predictors of chorioamnionitis in preterm patients with premature rupture of membranes. Southern Medical Journal 1988;81:40.
Morales WJ, Angel JL, O'Brien WF, Knuppel RA. Use of ampicillin and corticosteroids in premature rupture of membranes: a randomized study. Obstetrics & Gynecology 1989;73(5):721‐6.

Ovalle‐Salas 1997 {published data only}

Ovalle A, Martinez M, Gomez R, Valderrama O, Lira P, Rubio R, et al. Preterm premature rupture of membranes: a prospective randomized placebo controlled trial of antibiotic treatment. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1996;174(1 Pt 2):401.
Ovalle A, Martinez M, Kakarieka E, Rubio R, Valderrama O, Villablanca E, et al. Antibiotic administration in patients with preterm premature rupture of membranes reduces the rate of histological chorioamnionitis. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1999;180(1 Pt 2):S83.
Ovalle‐Salas A, Gomez R, Martinez MA, Rubio R, Fuentes A, Valderrama O, et al. Antibiotic therapy in patients with preterm premature rupture of membranes: a prospective, randomized, placebo‐controlled study with microbiological assessment of the amniotic cavity and lower genital tract. Prenatal and Neonatal Medicine 1997;2:213‐22.

Owen 1993a {published data only}

Owen J, Groome LJ, Hauth JC. Randomised trial of prophylactic therapy after preterm amnion rupture. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1993;169(4):976‐81.
Owen J, Groome LJ, Hauth JC. Randomized trial of prophylactic antibiotic therapy after preterm amnion rupture. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1993;168(1 Pt 2):379.

Segel 2003 {published data only}

Segel S, Miles A, Clothier B, Parry S, Macones G. Optimal duration of antibiotic therapy after PPROM. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2002;187(6 Pt 2):S72.
Segel SY, Miles AM, Clothier B, Parry S, Macones GA. Duration of antibiotic therapy after preterm premature rupture of fetal membranes. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2003;189:799‐802.

Svare 1997a {published data only}

Svare J. Preterm delivery and subclinical uro‐genital infection [thesis]. Denmark: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, 1997.
Svare J, Langhoff‐Roos J, Andersen LF, Baggesen NK, Christensen HB, Heisterberg L, et al. Antibiotic treatment in preterm labor or preterm premature rupture of the membranes ‐ a randomized controlled double‐blind trial. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica Supplement 1996;75(Suppl 162):36.
Svare J, Langhoff‐Roos J, Andersen LF, Kryger‐Baggesen N, Borch‐Christensen H, Heisterberg L, et al. Ampicillin‐metronidazole treatment in threatening preterm delivery. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 1997;76(167:1):86.

References to studies excluded from this review

Almeida 1996 {published data only}

Almeida L, Schmauch A, Bergstrom S. A randomised study on the impact of peroral amoxicillin in women with prelabour rupture of membranes preterm. Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation 1996;41:82‐4.

Bergstrom 1991 {published data only}

Bergstrom S. A prospective study on the perinatal outcome in Mozambican pregnant women with preterm rupture of membranes using two different methods of clinical management. Gynecologic & Obstetric Investigation 1991;32:217‐9.

Blanco 1993 {published data only}

Blanco J, Iams J, Artal R, Baker J, Hibbard J, McGregor J, et al. Multicenter double‐blind prospective random trial of ceftizoxime vs placebo in women with preterm premature ruptured membranes (pPROM). American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1993;168:378.

Cardamakis 1990 {published data only}

Cardamakis E, Minaretzis D, Papageorgiou J, Karaiskakis P, Kioses E, Michalas S. Premature rupture of the membranes. II. Chemioprophylaxis. Proceedings of 12th European Congress of Perinatal Medicine; 1990 Sept 11‐14; Lyon, France. 1990:45.

Carroll 2000 {published data only}

Carroll E, Heywood P, Besinger R, Muraskas J, Fisher S, Gianopoulos JG. A prospective randomized double blind trial of ampicillin with and without sulbactam in preterm premature rupture of the membranes [abstract]. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2000;182(1 Pt 2):S61.

Debodinance 1990 {published data only}

Debodinance P, Parmentier D, Devulder G, Closset P, Querleu D, Crepin G. Can one reduce the risk of neonatal infection after premature rupture of membranes? [Peut‐on reduire le risque infectieux neonatal dans les ruptures prematurees des membranes?]. Journal de Gynecologie, Obstetrique et Biologie de la Reproduction 1990;19:533‐7.

Dunlop 1986 {published data only}

Dunlop PDM, Crowley PA, Lamont RF, Hawkins DF. Preterm ruptured membranes, no contractions. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1986;7:92‐6.

Fortunato 1990 {published data only}

Fortunato SJ, Welt SI, Eggleston M, Cole J, Bryant EC, Dodson MG. Prolongation of the latency period in preterm premature rupture of the membranes using prophylactic antibiotics and tocolysis. Journal of Perinatology 1990;3:252‐6.

Gordon 1974 {published data only}

Gordon M, Weingold AB. Treatment of patients with premature rupture of the fetal membranes: (a) prior to 32 weeks; (b) after 32 weeks. Premature rupture of the membranes ‐ a rational approach to management. In: Reid DE, Christian CD editor(s). Controversy in Obstetrics & Gynecology II. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company, 1974:42‐4.

Haas 2010 {published data only}

Haas D. Preterm premature rupture of membranes: erythromycin versus azithromycin a randomized trial comparing their efficacy to prolong latency (PEACE trial). http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01556334 (accessed 25 June 2012)2010.

Halis 2001 {published data only}

Halis, Ragosch, Hundertmark, Weitzel, Hopp. Antibiotic therapy for reduction of infant morbidity after preterm premature rupture of the membranes ‐ a randomized controlled trial. 11th European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases; 2001 April 1‐4; Istanbul, Turkey. 2001.

Hernandez 2011 {published data only}

Hernandez y Ballinas A, Lopez Faran JA, Gamez Guevara C. [Comparison of maternal and perinatal outcomes in the conservative treatment preterm premature membrane rupture between the use of erythromycin and clindamycin]. [Spanish]. Ginecologia y Obstetricia de Mexico 2011;79(7):403‐10.

Julien 2002 {published data only}

Julien S, Khandelwal M, Olasewere T. Randomised trial comparing long term versus short term antibiotic prophylaxis in preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM). American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2002;187(6 Pt 2):S66.

Kim 2008 {published data only}

Kim YH, Song TB, Kim CH, Kim JW, Cho MY, Yang SY, et al. Changes of lipid peroxidation and protein carbonyls formation by antibiotic therapy in the maternal venous plasma of preterm premature rupture of membranes. 55th Annual Meeting of the Society of Gynecologic Investigation; 2008 March 26‐29; San Diego, USA2008:Abstract no: 398.

Kwak 2013 {published data only}

Kwak HM, Shin MY, Cha HH, Choi SJ, Lee JH, Kim JS, et al. The efficacy of cefazolin plus macrolide (erythromycin or clarithromycin) versus cefazolin alone in neonatal morbidity and placental inflammation for women with preterm premature rupture of membranes. Placenta 2013;34(4):346‐52.

Lebherz 1963 {published data only}

Lebherz TB, Hellman LP, Madding R, Anctil A, Arje SL. Double‐blind study of premature rupture of the membranes. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1963;87(2):218‐25.

Lewis 1995 {published data only}

Lewis DF, Fontenot MT, Brooks GG, Wise R, Perkins MB, Heymann AR. Latency period after preterm premature rupture of membranes: a comparison of ampicillin with and without sulbactam. Obstetrics & Gynecology 1995;86(3):392‐5.

Lewis 1996 {published data only}

Lewis DF, Brody K, Edwards MS, Brouillette RM, Burlison S, London S. Preterm premature ruptured membranes: a randomized trial of steroids after treatment with antibiotics. Obstetrics & Gynecology 1996;88(5):801‐5.

Lovett 1997 {published data only}

Lovett S, Weiss J, Diogo M, Williams P, Garite T. A prospective randomized clinical trial of antibiotic therapy for preterm premature rupture of membranes. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1996;174:306.
Lovett SM, Weiss JD, Diogo MJ, Williams PT, Garite TJ. A prospective, double‐blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial of ampicillin‐sulbactam for preterm premature rupture of membranes in women receiving antenatal corticosteroid therapy. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1997;176(5):1030‐8.

Matsuda 1993a {published data only}

Matsuda Y, Ikenoue T, Ibara S, Sameshima H, Kuraya K, Hokanishi H. The efficacy of prophylactic antibiotic and tocolytic therapy for premature rupture of the membranes. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Japonica 1993;45(10):1109‐14.

Matsuda 1993b {published data only}

Matsuda Y, Ikenoue T, Hokanishi H. Premature rupture of the membranes ‐ aggressive versus conservative approach: effect of tocolytic and antibiotic therapy. Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation 1993;36:102‐7.

Mbu 1998 {published data only}

Mbu RE, Tchio R, Leke RG, Tamba NE, Njoh N. Premature rupture of membranes: maternal and fetal outcome in the absence of antibiotic prophylaxis [Rupture prematuree des membranes: devenir maternal et foetal en l'absence de la prophylaxie antibiotique]. African Journal of Reproductive Health 1998;2:26‐31.

McCaul 1992 {published data only}

McCaul JF, Perry KG, Moore JL, Martin RW, Bucovaz ET, Morrison JC. Adjunctive antibiotic treatment of women with preterm rupture of membranes or preterm labor. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 1992;38:19‐24.

Norri 1991 {published data only}

Norri L, Yla‐Outinen A, Tuimala R. Prophylactic antibiotics in premature rupture of membranes. Proceedings of 13th World Congress of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO);1991 September; Singapore. 1991:80.

Ogasawara 1996 {published data only}

Ogasawara KK, Goodwin TM. The efficacy of treating ureaplasma urealyticum in patients with preterm labor or preterm premature rupture of membranes. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1996;174(1 Pt 2):401.

Ogasawara 1997 {published data only}

Ogasawara KK, Goodwin TM. The efficacy of prophylactic erythromycin in preventing vertical transmission of ureaplasma urealyticum. American Journal of Perinatology 1997;14(4):233‐7.

Ogasawara 1999 {published data only}

Ogasawara KK, Goodwin TM. Efficacy of azithromycin in reducing lower genital ureaplasma urealyticum colonization in women at risk for preterm delivery. Journal of Maternal Fetal Medicine 1999;8:12‐6.

Ovalle 2002 {published data only}

Ovalle A, Martinez MA, Kakarieka E, Gomez R, Rubio R, Valderrama O, et al. Antibiotic administration in patients with preterm premature rupture of the membranes reduces the rate of histological chorioamnionitis: a prospective, randomised, controlled study. Journal of Maternal‐Fetal & Neonatal Medicine 2002;12:35‐41.

Spitzer 1993 {published data only}

Spitzer D, Zajc M, Gregg A, Steiner H, Staudach A. Antepartum antibiotic therapy and subsequent neonatal morbidity in patients with preterm premature rupture of the membranes. International Journal of Experimental and Clinical Chemotherapy 1993;6(1):35‐8.

Alderson 2004

Alderson P, Green S, Higgins JPT, editors. Cochrane Reviewers' Handbook 4.2.2 [updated March 2004]. The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2004. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Amon 1988b

Amon E, Lewis S, Sibai BM, Moretti M. Ampicillin prophylaxis in preterm premature rupture of the membranes: a prospective randomized study. Proceedings of 8th Annual Meeting of the Society of Perinatal Obstetricians; 1988 Feb 3‐6; Las Vegas, Nevada, USA. 1988:51.

Beazley 1998

Beazley D. Impact of amnionitis and antepartum antibiotic treatment on neonatal outcome after PPROM. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1998;178(1 Pt 2):S15.

Bejar 1981

Bejar R, Curbelo V, Davi SC, Gluck L. Premature labour bacterial sources of phospholipase. Obstetrics & Gynecology 1981;57:479.

Christmas 1990

Christmas JT, Cox SM, Gilstrap LC, Leveno KJ, Andrews W, Dax J. Expectant management of preterm ruptured membranes: effects of antimicrobial therapy on interval to delivery. Proceedings of 10th Annual Meeting of Society of Perinatal Obstetricians; 1990 Jan 23‐27; Houston, Texas, USA. 1990:19.

Costeloe 2012

Costeloe KL, Hennessy EM, Haider S, Stacey F, Marlow N, Draper ES. Short term outcomes after extreme preterm birth in England: comparison of two birth cohorts in 1995 and 2006 (the EPICURE studies). BMJ 2012;345:e7976.

Dale 1989

Dale PO, Tanbo T, Bendvold E, Moe N. Duration of the latency period in preterm premature rupture of the membranes. Maternal and neonatal consequences of expectant management. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology 1989;30:257‐62.

Dammann 1997

Dammann O, Leviton A. Maternal intrauterine infection, cytokines, and brain damage in the preterm newborn. Pediatric Research 1997;42(1):1‐8.

Dammann 2005

Dammann O, Leviton A, Gappa M, Dammann CE. Lung and brain damage in preterm newborns, and their association with gestational age, prematurity subgroup, infection/inflammation and long term outcome. BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 2005;112(Suppl 1):4‐9.

Elbourne 2002

Elbourne DR, Altman DG, Higgins JPT, Curtin F, Vaillancourt JM. Meta‐analyses involving cross‐over trials: methodological issues. International Journal of Epidemiology 2002;31:140‐9.

Gilbert 2005

Gilbert RE, Pike K, Kenyon SL, Tarnow‐Mordi W, Taylor DJ. The effect of prepartum antibiotics on the type of neonatal bacteraemia: insights from the MRC ORACLE trials. BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 2005;112(6):830‐2.

Goldenberg 2008

Goldenberg RL, Culhane JF, Iams JD, Romero R. Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. Lancet 2008;371(9606):75‐84. [PUBMED: 18177778]

Hauth 1997

Hauth JC. The NICHD‐MFMU antibiotic treatment of PROM study: correlation with acute placental inflammation and prenatal morbidity. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1997;176(1 Pt 2):S53.

Higgins 2011

Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org.

Hnat 2005

Hnat MD, Mercer BM, Thurnau G, Goldenberg R, Thom EA, Meis PJ, et al. Perinatal outcomes in women with preterm rupture of membranes between 24 and 32 weeks of gestation and a history of vaginal bleeding. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2005;193:164‐8.

Hoy 2001

Hoy CM. The role of infection in necrotising enterocolitis. Reviews in Medical Microbiology 2001;12:121‐9.

Kenyon 2008a

Kenyon S, Pike K, Jones DR, Brocklehurst P, Marlow N, Salt A, et al. Childhood outcomes after prescription of antibiotics to pregnant women with preterm rupture of the membranes: 7‐year follow‐up of the ORACLE I trial. Lancet 2008;372(9646):1310‐8.

Kenyon 2008b

Kenyon S, Pike K, Jones DR, Brocklehurst P, Marlow N, Salt A, et al. Childhood outcomes after prescription of antibiotics to pregnant women with spontaneous preterm labour: 7‐year follow‐up of the ORACLE II trial. Lancet 2008;372(9646):1319‐27.

Kenyon 2008c

Kenyon S, Brocklehurst P, Jones D, Marlow N, Salt A, Taylor D. MRC ORACLE children study. Long term outcomes following prescription of antibiotics to pregnant women with either spontaneous preterm labour or preterm rupture of the membranes. BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth 2008;8:14.

King 2002

King J, Flenady V. Prophylactic antibiotics for inhibiting preterm labour with intact membranes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2002, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000246]

Kotecha 1996

Kotecha S. Cytokines in chronic lung disease of prematurity. European Journal of Pediatrics 1996;155 Suppl 2:S14‐S17. [PUBMED: 8839740]

Lockwood 1993b

Lockwood CJ, Costigan K, Ghidini A, Wein R, Cetrulo C, Alvarez M, et al. Double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial of piperacillin sodium in preterm membrane rupture. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1993;168(1 Pt 2):378.

Marlow 2005

Marlow N, Wolke D, Bracewell MA, Samara M. Neurologic and developmental disability at six years of age after extremely preterm birth. New England Journal of Medicine 2005;352(1):9‐19. [PUBMED: 15635108]

McGregor 1997

McGregor J, French J. Evidence‐based prevention of preterm birth and rupture of membranes: infection and inflammation. Journal of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada 1997;19:835‐51.

Morales 1988

Morales WJ, Angel JL, Knuppel RA. Comparison of various parameters as predictors of chorioamnionitis in preterm patients with premature rupture of membranes. Southern Medical Journal 1988;81:40.

Owen 1993b

Owen J, Groome LJ, Hauth JC. Randomized trial of prophylactic antibiotic therapy after preterm amnion rupture. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1993;168(1 Pt 2):379.

RevMan 2011 [Computer program]

The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). Version 5.1. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011.

Romero 2007

Romero R, Gotsch F, Pineles B, Kusanovic JP. Inflammation in pregnancy: its roles in reproductive physiology, obstetrical complications, and fetal injury. Nutrition Reviews 2007;65:S194‐202.

Saigal 2008

Saigal S, Doyle LW. An overview of mortality and sequelae of preterm birth from infancy to adulthood. Lancet 2008;371(9608):261‐9. [PUBMED: 18207020]

Sanchez‐Ramos 1990

Sanchez‐Ramos L, Johnston M, Vaughn A, Benrubi GI, Todd M. High dose antibiotic therapy in preterm premature rupture of the membranes: a double blind, randomized, prospective study. Proceedings of 10th Annual Meeting of Society of Perinatal Obstetricians; 1990 Jan 23‐27; Houston, Texas, USA. 1990:18.

Speer 2003

Speer CP. Inflammation and bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Seminars in Neonatology 2003;8 No. 1:29‐38.

Svare 1997b

Svare J, Langhoff‐Roos J, Andersen LF, Kryger‐Baggesen N, Borch‐Christensen H, Heisterberg L, et al. Ampicillin‐metronidazole treatment in threatening preterm delivery. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 1997;76(167:1):86.

Taylor 2001

Taylor HG, Klein N, Minich NM, Hack M. Long‐term family outcomes for children with very low birth weights. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine 2001;155(2):155‐61. [PUBMED: 11177090]

Thurnau 1997

Thurnau G. The NICHD‐MFMU antibiotic treatment of PROM study: impact of initial amniotic fluid volume on pregnancy outcome. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1997;176(1 Pt 2):S53.

Wu 2002

Wu YW. Systematic review of chorioamnionitis and cerebral palsy. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews 2002;8(1):25‐9.

Yoon 2000

Yoon BH, Romero R, Park JS, Kim M, Oh SY, Kin CJ, et al. The relationship among inflammatory lesions of the umbilical cord (funisitis), umbilical cord plasma interleukin 6 concentration, amniotic fluid infection, and neonatal sepsis. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2000;183(5):1124‐9.

References to other published versions of this review

Crowley 1995

Crowley P. Antibiotics for preterm prelabour rupture of membranes. [revised 05 May 1994]. In: Enkin MW, Keirse MJNC, Renfrew MJ, Neilson JP, Crowther C (eds.) Pregnancy and Childbirth Module. In: The Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Database [database on disk and CDROM]. The Cochrane Collaboration; Issue 2, Oxford: Update Software; 1995.

Kenyon 2001

Kenyon S, Boulvain M. Antibiotics for preterm premature rupture of membranes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2001, Issue 3.

Kenyon 2003

Kenyon S, Boulvain M, Neilson JP. Antibiotics for preterm rupture of membranes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2003, Issue 2. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001058]

Kenyon 2004

Kenyon S, Boulvain M, Neilson J. Antibiotics for preterm rupture of the membranes: a systematic review. Obstetrics & Gynecology 2004;104(5 Pt 1):1051‐7. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001058]

Kenyon 2010

Kenyon S, Boulvain M, Neilson JP. Antibiotics for preterm rupture of membranes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 8. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001058.pub2]

Characteristics of studies

Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]

Amon 1988a

Methods

Randomised trial. No mention of method of randomisation. Not placebo‐controlled or blinded.

Participants

82 women treatment 43 control 39. Inclusions: 20‐34 weeks' pregnant. PPROM confirmed by sterile speculum. Singleton pregnancy only.

Interventions

Treatment group: ampicillin 1 g IV every 6 hours for 24 hours. Maintained on oral 500 mg ampicillin 6‐hourly until delivery. In labour they were recommenced on 1 g IV ampicillin.

Outcomes

Death only included.

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

No information given.

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

No information given.

Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes

High risk

Not blinded.

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Data appear complete.

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

Protocol not available.

Other bias

Unclear risk

No information available.

Camli 1997

Methods

Randomised trial ‐ no mention of the method of randomisation.

Participants

31 women with premature rupture of the membranes between 28‐34 weeks gestation. PPROM confirmed by speculum. Exclusions: women who go into active labour within 24 hours or who need induction of labour. Multiple pregnancy and fetal malformations. Women with serious medical conditions or who need antibiotic treatment for a known infection. Women who have received antibiotics in the last 10 days or who are allergic to penicillin.

Interventions

Treatment group oral ampicillin 1 g 4 x daily.
No placebo arm or tocolysis used.

Outcomes

Death only included.

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

No information given.

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

No information given.

Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes

High risk

Not blinded.

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Data appear complete.

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

Protocol not available.

Other bias

Unclear risk

No information available.

Christmas 1992

Methods

Randomised trial. Using sequentially numbered sealed envelopes. Not placebo‐controlled or blinded. The control group received IV fluids without antibiotics for first 24 hours.

Participants

94 women randomised 48 treatment, 46 control. Inclusions: singleton pregnancies 20‐34 weeks with PPROM confirmed by sterile speculum.
Exclusions: penicillin allergy. Prior antibiotic therapy. Clinical evidence of intra‐amniotic infection. Evidence of labour or fetal distress.

Interventions

Treatment: 24 hours IV ampicillin 2 g every 6 hours for 4 doses; gentamycin 90 mg loading dose 60 mg every 8 hours for 3 doses. Then oral amoxicillin + clavulanic acid. 500 mg 3 x day for 7 days. Control IV fluids without antibiotics for 24 hours.

Outcomes

Death only included.

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

No information given.

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

Using sequentially numbered sealed envelopes.

Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes

High risk

Not blinded.

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Data appear complete.

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

Protocol not available.

Other bias

Unclear risk

No information given.

Cox 1995

Methods

Randomised controlled trial.

Participants

62 women PPROM between 24 and 29 weeks' pregnant. Not stated whether multiple pregnancy included.

Interventions

Co‐amoxiclav 3 g 6‐hourly for 4 doses then co‐amoxiclav 500 mg 6‐hourly for 5 days or matching placebo.

Outcomes

Prolongation of pregnancy.
Neonatal mortality and morbidity.

Notes

Data extracted from abstract only. Further data requested from Dr Cox but not made available.
Study took place between May 1991 and April 1994 in Dallas, Texas.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

No information given.

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

No information given.

Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Stated as double blind study.

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Data appear complete.

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

Protocol not available.

Other bias

Unclear risk

No information given.

Ernest 1994

Methods

Randomised double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial. A table of random numbers was used. Drugs and placebo were prepared by research nurses. The authors specify that participants and caregivers were blinded as to group.

Participants

148 women at 21‐37 weeks with premature rupture of the membranes preterm confirmed with positive nitrazine test and 'ferning' of amniotic fluid or by seeing vaginal pool of amniotic fluid from os. No tocolytics or steroids given. Multiple pregnancies included.
Exclusions are not clearly stated.

Interventions

4‐hourly IV 1 million units benzylpenicillin for 12‐24 hours ‐ oral 250 mg penicillin twice daily before delivery or a matched placebo.

Outcomes

Latency period, infection complications and neonatal
outcomes studies. Data on death not included.

Notes

Study conducted from March 2 1989 to May 29 1991, in a single site (North Carolina, USA). 148 women.
71 placebo.
77 treatment.
4 women were excluded because of protocol violation in placebo arm (antibiotics given).

Information on neonatal death not given.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

Table of random numbers.

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

Stated that nurses were not involved in the preparation or release of either antibiotic or placebo.

Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Patients and staff blinded.

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Data excluded for 4 women who were treated with antibiotics outside the protocol.

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

Protocol not available.

Other bias

Unclear risk

No information given.

Fuhr 2006

Methods

Randomised double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial ‐ multicentre.

Participants

105 pregnant women with PROM between 24+0 and 32+6 weeks.

Exclusion criteria not clearly stated nor whether multiple pregnancy included.

Interventions

Metzlocillin 2 g given 3 x day for 7 days or placebo.

All women given corticosteroids and tocolytics IV.

Outcomes

Prolongation of pregnancy and neonatal mortality and morbidity.

Notes

5 centres in Germany ‐ dates not given.

47 women in treatment arm and 58 in control.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

No information given.

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

No information given.

Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Stated as double‐blind trial.

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Data appear complete.

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

Protocol not available.

Other bias

Unclear risk

No information given.

Garcia‐Burguillo 1995

Methods

Randomised double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial.

Participants

60 singleton pregnancy women. Preterm PROM under 36 weeks' pregnant. Ruptured membranes confirmed by sterile speculum examination, ferning test and nitrazine test.
No steroids or tocolytics given after randomisation.

Exclusions: > 37/40.
Discrepancy of over 2 standard deviations between scan and dates EDD.
Bleeding.
Contractions.
Fetal distress.
Fetal malformation.
Fetal death.
Chorioamnionitis on admission.
Antibiotics given during previous 10 days.

Interventions

Erythromycin 500 mg 6‐hourly orally until delivery. Matched placebo given until delivery.

Outcomes

Maternal morbidity. Neonatal mortality and morbidity.

Notes

60 women recruited during 1992 from single centre in Madrid, Spain.
No losses to follow‐up.

Paper in Spanish and data extracted with help from Dr Pigem.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

Computer‐generated.

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

No information given.

Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Stated as double‐blind trial.

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Data appear complete.

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

Protocol not available.

Other bias

Unclear risk

No information given.

Grable 1996

Methods

60 women randomised to double blind placebo controlled trial. Randomisation based on random numbers tables with blocks providing 1:1 ratio and balancing every 6 women. Randomisation conducted in pharmacy.

Participants

60 women randomised. Inclusions <= 35 weeks with documented PPROM.
Exclusions: digital examination of cx, non‐reassuring stress test, presence of chorioamnionitis, abruptio placenta, pre‐eclampsia, multiple pregnancy and penicillin allergy.

Interventions

IV ampicillin 2 g every 6 hours for 24 hours followed by 500 mg oral ampicillin until delivery or discharge. Matched placebos.

Outcomes

Maternal morbidity. Neonatal mortality and morbidity.

Notes

Study divided into GBS positive and negative patients. Unclear whether clinician knew of positive culture.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

Randomisation based on random numbers tables with blocks providing 1:1 ratio and balancing every 6 women.

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

Randomisation and preparation of drugs conducted in pharmacy.

Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Double‐blind trial.

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Data appear complete.

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

Protocol not available.

Other bias

Unclear risk

No information given.

Johnston 1990

Methods

Randomised double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial. Randomisation table generated by consecutive coin toss, the randomisation schedule kept in pharmacy.

Participants

85 women randomised. Inclusions: mothers with singleton gestations between 20‐34 weeks with PPROM confirmed by sterile speculum for pooling, ferning and nitrazine paper testing.
Exclusions: penicillin allergy, taking antibiotics at the time of PPROM, had fever > 100.4 degrees Fahrenheit, had signs of chorioamnionitis, were in active labour (defined by 3 or more contractions per 10‐minute period for 1 hour or presented with cervical dilatation > 3 cm confirmed at the time of sterile speculum. Fetal indications for exclusion were the presence of fetal distress, defined as repetitive late deceleration or sustained bradycardia, or congenital abnormality on ultrasound.

Interventions

IV mezlocillin for 48 hours followed by oral ampicillin until delivery or matched (IV + oral) placebo.
No doses noted. After randomisation no tocolytic steroids given.
Study drugs discontinued if infection diagnosed.

Outcomes

Not clearly defined other than maternal or perinatal morbidity and mortality.
Outcomes looked at included length of pregnancy, maternal infectious morbidity, mode of delivery. Neonatal outcomes ‐ stillbirth, neonatal death, birthweight Apgar, cord pH, positive blood culture, RDS, IVH, NEC, NICU stay over 30 days.

Notes

Single centre ‐ University Medical Centre ‐ Jacksonville Florida.
85 women randomised.
All women had infection screen on admission. No digital examination allowed.
No comment as to losses to follow‐up or recruitment period.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

Randomisation table generated by consecutive coin toss.

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

The randomisation schedule kept in pharmacy.

Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Randomisation schedule stated as not being available to clinicians.

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Data appear complete.

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

Protocol not available.

Other bias

Unclear risk

No information given.

Kenyon 2001

Methods

Randomised double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial.

Participants

4826 women under 37 weeks' pregnant with PROM. Multiple pregnancies included.

UK follow‐up at 7 years of age of the 4378 children of the 4148 eligible women who joined the ORACLE trial using a parental questionnaire. Exclusions 661 women (246 due to perinatal death, 376 randomised outside UK and 39 women withdrew).

Interventions

Co‐amoxiclav 375 mg QDS, erythromycin 250 mg QDS orally for 10 days or until delivery matched placebo (2 x 2 factorial design).

Outcomes

Primary outcome: neonatal death or abnormal brain scans on discharge from hospital or oxygenation at 36 weeks' postconceptual age.
Secondary outcomes include prolongation of pregnancy, neonatal infection, respiratory outcomes.

Functional impairment was assessed using the Mark III Multi‐Attribute Health Status classification system. Primary outcome was defined as any level of functional impairment (severe, moderate or mild). Other outcomes included death, behaviour (using the Strengths and Difficulties questionnaire) prespecified questions on respiratory symptoms, hospital admissions, convulsions, other prespecified medical conditions and demographic data. Educational attainment was evaluated for children in England using data from National Cirriculum Tests at 7 years of age (Key Stage 1).

Notes

Multicentre trial (161 centres, 135 in the UK). Randomised 4826 women. 2 women lost to follow‐up and 15 women were excluded due to protocol violations. 4809 women analysed. For twin pregnancies adverse outcomes were considered present if one twin affected. Consumers involved in drawing up of protocol and information for women.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

By computer using randomly generated blocks of 4.

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

Sequentially numbered drug boxes of identical appearance.

Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Stated that clinicians remained blind to treatment allocation in all but 9 cases and that all staff and participants remained blind to treatment allocation.

For the follow‐up study all participants bar 1 women and all Study staff remained blind to treatment allocation.

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

2 women lost to follow‐up and 15 protocol violations.

In the follow‐up study outcome data were determined for 75% of eligible children.

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Low risk

No selective reporting.

Protocol published for follow‐up study.

Other bias

Low risk

The study appears to be free of other sources of bias.

Kurki 1992

Methods

Randomised double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial.

Participants

101 women randomised between 23‐36 weeks' pregnant with visible leakage of amniotic fluid who did not go into labour within 12 hours of admission. Sterile speculum, digital examination and infection screening was performed on admission. Multiple pregnancies included.

Interventions

2 doses of IV penicillin (5 mu) or matched placebo.

Outcomes

Prolongation of pregnancy. Infection, neonatal morbidity and mortality. Long‐term development at 2 years.

Notes

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Helsinki, Finland.
No mention of where the study was conducted. Sealed envelope randomisation.
Results in 76 women not randomised but admitted during the same period are also reported.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

No information given.

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

Stated as being by sealed envelope.

Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Stated as double‐blind trial.

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Data appear complete.

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

Protocol not available.

Other bias

Unclear risk

No information given.

Lewis 2003

Methods

Randomised trial looking at 3 or 7 days antibiotic therapy. Randomised using table of arbitrary numbers in blocks of 10. Indicator cards placed in sealed envelopes which were sequentially numbered and stored on an area away from the enrolment site.

Participants

84 singleton pregnancies were randomised between 24‐34 weeks' gestation. Exclusions included known infection, absence of cervical cerclage, not penicillin allergic. Corticosteroids given to all participants.

Interventions

Ampicillin‐sulbactam 3 g intravenously every six hours for either 3 or 7 days.

Outcomes

Primary outcome was latency period between membrane rupture and delivery. Infection and neonatal morbidity and mortality.

Notes

3 study sites in Tennessee USA.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

Randomised using table of arbitrary numbers in blocks of 10.

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

Indicator cards placed in sealed envelopes which were sequentially numbered and stored on an area away from the enrolment site

Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Stated that all carers were unaware of the randomisation process.

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Data appear complete.

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

Protocol not available.

Other bias

Unclear risk

No information given.

Lockwood 1993a

Methods

Randomised double‐blind placebo‐controlled trial.

Participants

75 women randomised with a single fetus at 24‐34 completed weeks (accurate gestational age), admitted with PROM. No digital examination unless active labour. Women had infection screening.
Exclusions: abruption, lethal fetal abnormalities clinical chorioamnionitis, maternal illness, diabetes, PIH, lupus, severe maternal disease, fetal growth retardation, fetal distress, cervical cerclage, active herpes. Women having received antibiotics for existing infection were also excluded.

Interventions

Piperacillin 3 g IV 6‐hourly 72 hours or placebo.

Outcomes

Prolongation of pregnancy.
Neonatal outcomes.

Notes

Recruitment in 3 centres (USA) from January 1987 to January 1992. 75 women were randomised (treatment 38, placebo 37).
3 babies (1 in the experimental group and 2 in controls) were lost to follow‐up.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

Computer‐generated randomisation sequence.

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

Same deposited in pharmacy.

Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Stated all healthcare providers were blinded to allocation.

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Data appear complete.

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

Protocol not available.

Other bias

Unclear risk

No information given.

Magwali 1999

Methods

Randomised trial not placebo‐controlled. Randomisation by opening sealed consecutive opaque envelopes in admission room.

Participants

171 women randomised 84 in treatment group 87 in no treatment group. Inclusion PROM 26‐36 weeks' gestation drainage of liquor confirmed by sterile speculum. Exclusions: clinical signs of chorioamnionitis, multiple pregnancy, those with any contraindication to continuing the pregnancy and those who had just completed a course of antibiotics for another reason.

Interventions

Co‐amoxiclav for 5 days. No mention of daily frequency or mg of drugs.

Outcomes

Death only included.

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

No information given.

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

Stated as being by sealed envelope.

Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes

High risk

Not blinded.

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Minimal loss to follow‐up ‐ 2 in the treatment and 1 in the no treatment group.

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

Protocol not available.

Other bias

Unclear risk

No information available.

McGregor 1991

Methods

Randomised double‐blind placebo‐controlled trial.
Computer‐generated random number list. Sequentially numbered bottles.

Participants

65 women with singleton pregnancies.
Women between 23‐34 completed weeks' gestation with PROM. Sterile speculum. No corticosteroids administered.
Exclusions: active labour, presence of maternal or fetal complication to necessitate delivery (fetal distress, prolapsed cord, pregnancy‐induced hypertension, abruptio placentae) placenta praevia, cervical cerclage, known infection requiring antibiotic treatment, use of vaginal or oral antibiotics in last 2 weeks, presence of known uterine or fetal abnormality, history of vaginal bleeding in last month, serious existing maternal disease, history of allergy or intolerance to erythromycin.

Interventions

Erythromycin 333 mg 3 x daily or placebo 7 days or until active labour started.

Outcomes

Prolongation of pregnancy. Maternal and neonatal infectious morbidity.

Notes

July 1986‐June 1988 University Hospital Denver.
65 women recruited (10 excluded ‐ 15%).
55 analysed ‐ (28 treatment, 27 placebo).

No replies received to letter requesting breakdown between stillbirths and neonatal deaths and asking if Blanco's paper has ever been published.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

Computer‐generated random number list.

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

Sequentially numbered bottles.

Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Stated as double‐blind trial.

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Data appear complete after 10 exclusions.

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

Protocol not available.

Other bias

Unclear risk

No information available.

Mercer 1992

Methods

Randomised double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial.
Computerised random number tables. Administered by the pharmacy.
Stratified at 30 weeks. gestational age.

Participants

Inclusions: 220 women 20‐34/6 weeks pregnant with PPROM ‐ sterile speculum and evaluation of cervix. Amniocentesis done for infection screen. Multiple pregnancies included.
Exclusions: PPROM > 72 hours duration, cervical dilatation > 4 cm, progressive labour, vaginal bleeding, temperature 99 degrees Fahrenheit or greater, active infection requiring antibiotic therapy, antibiotic therapy within 1 week prior to admission, active hepatic disease, erythromycin allergy, cervical cerclage or medical condition requiring delivery. IUGR (< 10 centile), congenital abnormalities, evidence of fetal distress, unsuccessful tocolysis on admission for preterm labour.

Interventions

Oral 333 mg erythromycin. 8‐hourly from randomisation to delivery with matched placebo.

Outcomes

Not clearly stated.
Prolongation of pregnancy. Reduction of infectious morbidity.

Notes

Single centre (Memphis, Tennessee, USA).
March 1989‐August 1990.
Women had infection screen before randomisation.
220 randomised, (treatment 106, placebo 114) 3 lost to follow‐up.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

Computerised random number tables.

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

Administered by the pharmacy.

Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

States that all involved remained blind to treatment allocation.

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Data appear complete.

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

Protocol not available.

Other bias

Unclear risk

No information given.

Mercer 1997

Methods

Randomised double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial. Urn randomisation scheme (a procedure to increase the likelihood of obtaining an equal number of subjects in each arm), stratified by centre.

Participants

614 women with PPROM at 24‐32 weeks' gestation. Inclusion criteria: membrane rupture within 36 hours of randomisation; cervical dilatation 3 cm or less on usual examination; < 5 contractions in 6 minutes.
Exclusion criteria: non‐reassuring, fetal testing; vaginal bleeding; maternal or fetal indication for delivery, cervical cerclage in place, antibiotics within the last 5 days, corticosteroids within last 7 days, allergy to penicillin or erythromycin, maternal infection or medical disease, ultrasound evidence of placenta praevia, fetal weight < 10th centile for gestational age, malformation. Previous successful tocolysis was not an exclusion criterion.
Tocolysis and corticosteroids were prohibited after randomisation.

Interventions

Ampicillin 2 g 6‐hourly and erythromycin 250 mg 6‐hourly IV for 48 hours, then oral amoxacillin 250 mg every 8 hours and erythromycin 333 mg 8‐hourly for 5 days and a matching placebo regimen.

Outcomes

Composite primary outcome included pregnancies complicated by at least 1 of the following: fetal or infant death, respiratory distress, severe intraventricular haemorrhage, stage 2 or 3 NEC, or sepsis within 72 hours of birth. These perinatal morbidities were also assessed separately and pregnancy prolongation assessed.
For twin pregnancies adverse outcomes considered present if 1 twin affected.

Notes

11 centres ‐ USA.
February 1992‐January 1995.
1867 women screened.
804 eligible.
614 agreed to participate.
29 twin gestations.
GBS positive: 118/614.
3 women lost to follow‐up.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

Urn randomisation scheme (a procedure to increase the likelihood of obtaining an equal number of subjects in each arm), stratified by centre.

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

Treatment given by pharmacy.

Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

States all involved remained blinded to treatment allocation.

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Only 3 withdrawals (2 in placebo and 1 in treatment arm).

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

No protocol available.

Other bias

Unclear risk

No information given.

Morales 1989

Methods

Randomised trial not placebo controlled. RCT of antenatal steroids + ampicillin. 4 groups ‐ GP1 ‐ neither, GP2 steroids only, GP3 antibiotic only, GP4 both. Randomised by using sealed envelopes into 1 of groups.

Participants

Randomised: 41 = GP1, 43 = GP2, 37 = GP3, 44 = GP4.
Inclusion criteria 26‐34 weeks' pregnant singleton gestation. PROM confirmed by sterile speculum L/S ratio less than 2.0.
Exclusions: In labour within 12 hours of randomisation women with uterine tenderness, foul smelling lochia or fetal tachycardia on admission, women allergic to penicillin, with congenital abnormality with L/S ratio greater than 2.0 or not obtained.

Interventions

2 g IV ampicillin every 6 hours until results of cervical cultures negative.

Outcomes

Death only included.

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

No information given.

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

States as sealed envelopes into 1 of 4 groups.

Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes

High risk

Not blinded.

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Data appear complete.

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

Protocol not available.

Other bias

Unclear risk

No information given.

Ovalle‐Salas 1997

Methods

Randomised double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial. No comment as to method of randomisation.

Participants

88 women.
Inclusions: women with PPROM 24‐34 weeks, PPROM diagnosed with sterile speculum‐pooling, ferning and nitrazine tests.
No digital examination performed.
Exclusions: labour, significant haemorrhage, abruptio placentae, use of antibiotics within 30 days before screening for study, fetal anomaly or death, multiple gestation, documented allergy to clindamycin or gentamicin, uterine abnormality, presence of IUCD, fetal distress, clinical chorioamnionitis, maternal medical complications necessitating delivery or any condition precluding expectant management and intrauterine growth retardation (< 10th centile for gestational age).

Interventions

Clindamycin 600 mg IV every 6 hours for 48 hours + 4 mg/kg/day gentamycin IV for 48 hours followed by Clindamycin 300 mg orally every 6 hours for 5 days + gentamycin 2 mg/kg/day IM every 12 hours for 5 days.
Matching placebo.

Outcomes

Prolongation of pregnancy, maternal infection related morbidity, birthweight, neonatal morbidity and admission to neonatal intensive care unit.

Notes

November 1990‐September 1994. 3 sites: 2 Chile, 1 USA.
Women had infection screen.
88 women randomised
(treatment 42, control 46).
1 lost to follow‐up in placebo arm.
Trial stopped after intermediate evaluation showed treatment group had better outcome.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Unclear risk

No information given.

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

No information given.

Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Stated as double‐blind trial.

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Data appear complete with 1 loss to follow‐up.

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

Protocol not available.

Other bias

High risk

Trial stopped after intermediate evaluation showed treatment group had better outcome.

Owen 1993a

Methods

Randomised not placebo‐controlled. Randomised using sealed opaque envelopes determined by computer algorithm.

Participants

118 randomised 1 lost to follow‐up. 59 treatment 58 controls. Inclusions 24 to 34 weeks' gestation. PPROM confirmed by speculum. Exclusions in labour, clinical evidence of infection suspected fetal compromise, membrane rupture over 2 days, fetal abnormality, antibiotics in last 7 days, multiple pregnancy, cervical cerclage, prompt delivery required.

Interventions

IV 1 g ampicillin 6‐hourly for 24 hours then 500 mg ampicillin orally every 6 hours. If allergic to penicillin 500 mg erythromycin used 6‐hourly. Treatment continued with delivery or diagnosis of chorioamnionitis.

Outcomes

Death only included.

Notes

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

By computer algorithm.

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

Sealed opaque envelope.

Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes

High risk

Not blinded.

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Data appear complete ‐ 1 woman lost to follow‐up in control group.

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

Protocol not available.

Other bias

Unclear risk

No information given.

Segel 2003

Methods

Randomised double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial of 3 or 7 days treatment. Pharmacy provided randomisation with a computer‐generated random number table in blocks of 4.

Participants

48 women randomised: 24 in each arm‐analysis on 23 in each arm. Women 24‐33 weeks with clinically confirmed ruptured membranes. Exclusions included penicillin allergy, active labour, suspected infection, multiple pregnancy, known medical maternal or fetal problems and exposure to antibiotics within 1 week before admission.

Interventions

For first 48 hours all women received parenteral ampicillin 2 g every 6 hours. Women were then randomly selected to receive either 3 or 7 days oral ampicillin. Women allocated the 3‐day course received a matching placebo.

Outcomes

Primary outcome of prolongation of pregnancy for at least 7 days. Secondary outcomes included rated of chorioamnionitis, postpartum endometritis and neonatal morbidity and mortality.

Notes

Study took place between September 1999 ‐ December 2001, Pennsylvania USA.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

Computer‐generated random number table in blocks of 4.

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Low risk

Study medicine given by pharmacy in identical packs.

Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Stated as double‐blind trial.

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Data appear complete.

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

Protocol not available.

Other bias

Unclear risk

No information given.

Svare 1997a

Methods

Randomised double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial. Block randomisation done using computer‐generated numbers.

Participants

67 women randomised. 26 + 0 ‐ 33 + 6 rupture of membranes, leakage of amniotic fluid at vaginal speculum examination. Preceding onset of uterine contractions. Singleton pregnancies.

Interventions

Ampicillin 2 g IV 6‐hourly. 24 hours ‐ pivampicillin 500 g orally 8‐hourly for 7 days plus IV metronidazole 500 mg every 8 hours for 24 hours, followed by metronidazole 400 mg orally every 8 hours for 7 days or identical placebo.

Outcomes

Latency period from admission ‐ delivery. Gestational age at delivery. Preterm delivery less than 37/40 maternal ‐ neonatal infection birthweight.

Notes

October 1991‐April 1994. 6 centres around Copenhagen.
67 women randomised.
30 antibiotics.
37 placebo.
Data sent from Mr Svare and extracted from PhD thesis.

Risk of bias

Bias

Authors' judgement

Support for judgement

Random sequence generation (selection bias)

Low risk

Block randomisation done using computer‐generated numbers.

Allocation concealment (selection bias)

Unclear risk

No information available.

Blinding (performance bias and detection bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Stated as double‐blind trial.

Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes

Low risk

Data appear complete.

Selective reporting (reporting bias)

Unclear risk

Protocol not available.

Other bias

Unclear risk

No information available

cx: cervix
EDD: expected date of delivery
GBS: group B Streptococcus
GP: group
IM: intramuscular
IUCD: intrauterine contraceptive device
IUGR: intrauterine growth retardation
IV: intravenous
IVH: intraventricular haemorrhage
L/S: lecithin/sphingomyelin
NEC: necrotising enterocolitis
NICU: neonatal intensive care unit
PIH: pregnancy induced hypertension
PPROM: preterm prelabour rupture of membranes
PROM: premature rupture of membranes
QDS: four times per day
RCT: randomised controlled trial
RDS: respiratory distress syndrome

Characteristics of excluded studies [ordered by study ID]

Study

Reason for exclusion

Almeida 1996

Joint venture between Mozambique (where women were recruited), Sweden and Norway.
Data (apart from birthweight and caesarean section rates in the paper) supplied additionally by authors but numbers of women different from paper. Author written to for clarification but no response received.

Bergstrom 1991

Random allocation to 2 management protocols (conservative versus induction).

Blanco 1993

Abstract only ‐ data requested.
Following comments received during the publication of this review in 2004, we wrote to Brian Mercer who included these data in a Lancet review in 1995 and James McGregor who was listed as an author.

Cardamakis 1990

Abstract only ‐ study randomised but no mention of whether blinded. Comparison of ampicillin versus ceftriaxone (doses not given). Minimal data expressed as P values.

Carroll 2000

Abstract only containing no usable data (P values only).

Debodinance 1990

Randomised trial of antibiotic treatment (mezlocillin) for women with PPROM. Not placebo‐controlled and no clinical outcomes reported. Mortality data requested from author.

Dunlop 1986

Study of 48 women with PPROM 26 to 34 weeks of pregnancy, given either oral ritodrine or cephalexin or both or neither (factorial design) ‐ not placebo‐controlled. No concealment of allocation for some participants (Latin Square method).

Fortunato 1990

Study that investigated active versus passive management of women with PPROM. 55 women were recruited when admitted and given antibiotics. The control group were women who presented with PPROM. 1985‐1987 before use of active protocol. Excluded as not double‐blinded, randomised or controlled.

Gordon 1974

Participants allocated to treatment or no treatment group on the arbitrary basis of the last digit of the admission number (unsatisfactory concealment of allocation). No mention of blinding.

Haas 2010

This was a trial registration. The trial did not take place and no results are available.

Halis 2001

Abstract containing no usable data. GBS prophylaxis also given for carriers.

Hernandez 2011

Study comparing two macrolide antibiotics: i.e. comparison of similar antibiotics ‐ so excluded as this antibiotic comparison was not included in this review.

Julien 2002

Study compared antibiotic versus placebo only after 48 hour intravenous antibiotic treatment to all.

Kim 2008

Study was neither randomised nor placebo‐controlled.

Kwak 2013

Study comparing a beta‐lactam antibiotic with the same antibiotic plus macrolide. This antibiotic comparison was not included in this review.

Lebherz 1963

Double‐blind randomised controlled trial of 1912 women but no mention of gestation at recruitment.

Lewis 1995

Study comparing treatment of women with PROM at 25 to 35 weeks' gestation in a randomised blinded trial comparing ampicillin‐sulbactam with ampicillin: i.e. comparison of similar antibiotics ‐ so excluded as this antibiotic comparison was not included in this review.

Lewis 1996

This is a randomised trial of corticosteroids in women with PPROM after a minimum of 12 hours ampicillin sulbactam.

77 women were enrolled. No statistically significant difference in latency period was noted. Neonatal and maternal infectious morbidity were similar. A significant reduction in the incidence of RDS, 18.4% versus 43.6%, was observed in the steroid group.

Lovett 1997

Double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial of 112 women with PPROM 23 to 25 weeks' gestation to receive ampicillin/sulbactam or ampicillin or placebo.

Excluded because of a high rate of exclusions (52/164: 32%). Further information has been requested from the authors.

Matsuda 1993a

Comparative study; not placebo‐controlled.

Matsuda 1993b

Prospective study, not randomised, of conservative versus aggressive management of women with PPROM. Aggressive management: IV antibiotics + tocolytics. Conservative management consisted of bedrest only.

Mbu 1998

Allocation by alternation.

McCaul 1992

Double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial of 84 women with PPROM (19 to 34 weeks' pregnant) who received ampicillin or placebo. 112 randomised ‐ 12 non‐compliant so excluded and 26 removed from study (does not add up). Letter sent to Mr McCaul to get excluded women's data; in the meantime, excluded.

Norri 1991

Abstract only ‐ does not say whether study was placebo‐controlled nor could any publication be found.

Ogasawara 1996

Abstract only ‐ data in further publication.

Ogasawara 1997

Randomised prospective study of 51 women with either PROM or SPL. Not placebo‐controlled and all women were given IV ampicillin 2 g every 6 hours until GBS status known.

Ogasawara 1999

Randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial of 60 women between 22 and 34 weeks pregnant with either PROM or SPL. All women were given IV ampicillin 2 g every 6 hours until GBS status known

Ovalle 2002

Randomised placebo‐controlled study looking at chorioamnionitis. No clear details of method of randomisation. 100 women recruited ‐71 analysed‐excluded as large number lost to follow‐up.

Spitzer 1993

Comparison of neonatal infection rates in 2 groups of women, with PPROM. Both groups were treated with tocolytic and steroid therapy. The first group was given antibiotic therapy continuously from onset of PPROM until delivery. The second group received antibiotic therapy for the first 3 days after PPROM and for a 3‐day period around each successive dose of corticosteroids. The study was neither randomised, nor placebo‐controlled or blinded.

GBS: group B Streptococcus
IV: intravenous
PPROM: preterm prelabour rupture of membranes
PROM: premature rupture of membranes
RDS: respiratory distress syndrome
SPL: spontaneous preterm labour

Data and analyses

Open in table viewer
Comparison 1. Any antibiotic versus placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Maternal death Show forest plot

3

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 1 Maternal death.

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 1 Maternal death.

1.1 Any antibiotic versus placebo

3

763

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.2 All penicillin (excluding co‐amoxiclav) versus placebo

1

85

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.3 Beta lactum (including co‐amoxiclav) versus placebo 

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.4 Macrolide (including erythromycin) versus placebo

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.5 Other antibiotic versus placebo

2

678

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 Serious maternal morbidity

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

2.1 Any antibiotic versus placebo

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.2 All penicillin (excluding co‐amoxiclav) versus placebo

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.3 Beta lactum (including co‐amoxiclav) versus placebo

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.4 Macrolide (including erythromycin) versus placebo

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.5 Other antibiotic versus placebo

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3 Perinatal death/death before discharge Show forest plot

12

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 3 Perinatal death/death before discharge.

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 3 Perinatal death/death before discharge.

3.1 Any antibiotic versus placebo

12

6301

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.93 [0.76, 1.14]

3.2 All penicillin (excluding co‐amoxiclav) versus placebo

4

332

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.78 [0.31, 1.97]

3.3 Beta lactum (including co‐amoxiclav) versus placebo

2

1880

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.62 [0.15, 2.56]

3.4 Macrolide (including erythromycin) versus placebo

4

2138

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.83 [0.43, 1.60]

3.5 Other antibiotic versus placebo

3

762

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.13 [0.68, 1.88]

4 Neonatal infection including pneumonia Show forest plot

12

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 4 Neonatal infection including pneumonia.

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 4 Neonatal infection including pneumonia.

4.1 Any antibiotic versus placebo

12

1680

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.67 [0.52, 0.85]

4.2 All penicillin (excluding co‐amoxiclav) versus placebo

5

521

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.30 [0.13, 0.68]

4.3 Beta lactum (including co‐amoxiclav) versus placebo

1

62

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.33 [0.01, 7.88]

4.4 Macrolide (including erythromycin) versus placebo

3

334

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.79 [0.45, 1.37]

4.5 Other antibiotic versus placebo

3

763

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.71 [0.53, 0.95]

5 Neonatal necrotising enterocolitis Show forest plot

11

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 5 Neonatal necrotising enterocolitis.

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 5 Neonatal necrotising enterocolitis.

5.1 Any antibiotic versus placebo

11

6229

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.09 [0.65, 1.83]

5.2 All penicillin (excluding co‐amoxiclav) versus placebo

3

262

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.85 [0.25, 2.97]

5.3 Beta lactum (including co‐amoxiclav) versus placebo

2

1880

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

4.72 [1.57, 14.23]

5.4 Macrolide (including erythromycin) versus placebo

3

2076

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.88 [0.45, 1.69]

5.5 Other antibiotic versus placebo

4

823

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.89 [0.54, 1.47]

6 Oxygen treatment > 36 weeks' postconceptual age Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 6 Oxygen treatment > 36 weeks' postconceptual age.

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 6 Oxygen treatment > 36 weeks' postconceptual age.

6.1 Any antibiotic versus placebo

1

4809

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.91 [0.70, 1.17]

6.2 All penicillin (excluding co‐amoxiclav) versus placebo

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.3 Beta lactum (including co‐amoxiclav) versus placebo

1

1818

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.92 [0.63, 1.36]

6.4 Macrolide (including erythromycin) versus placebo

1

1803

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.89 [0.61, 1.32]

6.5 Other antibiotic versus placebo

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7 Major cerebral abnormality on ultrasound before discharge Show forest plot

12

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 1.7

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 7 Major cerebral abnormality on ultrasound before discharge.

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 7 Major cerebral abnormality on ultrasound before discharge.

7.1 Any antibiotic versus placebo

12

6289

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.81 [0.68, 0.98]

7.2 All penicillin (excluding co‐amoxiclav) versus placebo 

3

262

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.49 [0.25, 0.96]

7.3 Beta lactum (including co‐amoxiclav) versus placebo

2

1880

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.78 [0.52, 1.16]

7.4 Macrolide (including erythromycin) versus placebo 

4

2136

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.93 [0.60, 1.44]

7.5 Other antibiotic versus placebo

4

823

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.85 [0.45, 1.64]

8 Birth before 37 weeks' gestation Show forest plot

3

4931

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.00 [0.98, 1.03]

Analysis 1.8

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 8 Birth before 37 weeks' gestation.

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 8 Birth before 37 weeks' gestation.

9 Major adverse drug reaction Show forest plot

3

5487

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Analysis 1.9

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 9 Major adverse drug reaction.

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 9 Major adverse drug reaction.

10 Maternal infection after delivery prior to discharge Show forest plot

4

5547

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.91 [0.80, 1.02]

Analysis 1.10

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 10 Maternal infection after delivery prior to discharge.

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 10 Maternal infection after delivery prior to discharge.

11 Chorioamnionitis Show forest plot

11

1559

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.66 [0.46, 0.96]

Analysis 1.11

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 11 Chorioamnionitis.

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 11 Chorioamnionitis.

12 Caesarean section Show forest plot

11

6317

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.96 [0.88, 1.05]

Analysis 1.12

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 12 Caesarean section.

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 12 Caesarean section.

13 Days from birth till discharge of mother

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

14 Days from randomisation to birth

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15 Birth within 48 hours of randomisation Show forest plot

7

5927

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.71 [0.58, 0.87]

Analysis 1.15

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 15 Birth within 48 hours of randomisation.

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 15 Birth within 48 hours of randomisation.

16 Birth within 7 days of randomisation Show forest plot

7

5965

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.79 [0.71, 0.89]

Analysis 1.16

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 16 Birth within 7 days of randomisation.

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 16 Birth within 7 days of randomisation.

17 Birthweight Show forest plot

12

6374

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

53.83 [7.06, 100.60]

Analysis 1.17

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 17 Birthweight.

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 17 Birthweight.

18 Birthweight < 2500 g Show forest plot

2

4876

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.00 [0.96, 1.04]

Analysis 1.18

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 18 Birthweight < 2500 g.

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 18 Birthweight < 2500 g.

19 Neonatal intensive care Show forest plot

4

5023

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.98 [0.84, 1.13]

Analysis 1.19

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 19 Neonatal intensive care.

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 19 Neonatal intensive care.

20 Days in neonatal intensive care unit Show forest plot

3

225

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐5.05 [‐9.77, ‐0.33]

Analysis 1.20

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 20 Days in neonatal intensive care unit.

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 20 Days in neonatal intensive care unit.

21 Positive neonatal blood culture Show forest plot

3

4961

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.79 [0.63, 0.99]

Analysis 1.21

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 21 Positive neonatal blood culture.

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 21 Positive neonatal blood culture.

22 Neonatal respiratory distress syndrome Show forest plot

12

6287

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.95 [0.83, 1.09]

Analysis 1.22

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 22 Neonatal respiratory distress syndrome.

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 22 Neonatal respiratory distress syndrome.

23 Treatment with surfactant Show forest plot

1

4809

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.83 [0.72, 0.96]

Analysis 1.23

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 23 Treatment with surfactant.

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 23 Treatment with surfactant.

24 Number of babies requiring ventilation Show forest plot

2

4924

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.90 [0.80, 1.02]

Analysis 1.24

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 24 Number of babies requiring ventilation.

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 24 Number of babies requiring ventilation.

25 Number of babies requiring oxygen therapy Show forest plot

1

4809

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.88 [0.81, 0.96]

Analysis 1.25

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 25 Number of babies requiring oxygen therapy.

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 25 Number of babies requiring oxygen therapy.

26 Neonatal oxygenation > 28 days Show forest plot

3

5487

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.79 [0.61, 1.03]

Analysis 1.26

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 26 Neonatal oxygenation > 28 days.

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 26 Neonatal oxygenation > 28 days.

27 Neonatal encephalopathy Show forest plot

1

60

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Analysis 1.27

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 27 Neonatal encephalopathy.

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 27 Neonatal encephalopathy.

28 Serious childhood disability at 7 years Show forest plot

1

3171

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.91, 1.12]

Analysis 1.28

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 28 Serious childhood disability at 7 years.

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 28 Serious childhood disability at 7 years.

Open in table viewer
Comparison 2. Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Maternal death

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 Serious maternal morbidity

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3 Major adverse drug reaction Show forest plot

1

2395

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Analysis 2.3

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 3 Major adverse drug reaction.

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 3 Major adverse drug reaction.

4 Maternal infection after delivery prior to discharge Show forest plot

1

2395

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.02 [0.87, 1.20]

Analysis 2.4

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 4 Maternal infection after delivery prior to discharge.

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 4 Maternal infection after delivery prior to discharge.

5 Chorioamnionitis

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6 Caesarean section Show forest plot

1

2395

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.02 [0.90, 1.16]

Analysis 2.6

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 6 Caesarean section.

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 6 Caesarean section.

7 Days from randomisation to birth

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8 Days from birth till discharge of mother

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9 Birth within 48 hours of randomisation Show forest plot

1

2395

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.14 [1.02, 1.28]

Analysis 2.9

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 9 Birth within 48 hours of randomisation.

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 9 Birth within 48 hours of randomisation.

10 Birth within 7 days of randomisation Show forest plot

1

2395

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.06 [0.99, 1.13]

Analysis 2.10

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 10 Birth within 7 days of randomisation.

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 10 Birth within 7 days of randomisation.

11 Birth before 37 weeks' gestation Show forest plot

1

2395

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.99 [0.96, 1.03]

Analysis 2.11

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 11 Birth before 37 weeks' gestation.

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 11 Birth before 37 weeks' gestation.

12 Birthweight Show forest plot

1

2395

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

19.0 [‐41.92, 79.92]

Analysis 2.12

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 12 Birthweight.

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 12 Birthweight.

13 Birthweight < 2500 g Show forest plot

1

2395

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.00 [0.95, 1.05]

Analysis 2.13

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 13 Birthweight < 2500 g.

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 13 Birthweight < 2500 g.

14 Neonatal intensive care Show forest plot

1

2395

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.00 [0.95, 1.05]

Analysis 2.14

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 14 Neonatal intensive care.

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 14 Neonatal intensive care.

15 Days in neonatal intensive care unit

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16 Neonatal infection including pneumonia

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

17 Positive neonatal blood culture Show forest plot

1

2395

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.84 [0.62, 1.15]

Analysis 2.17

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 17 Positive neonatal blood culture.

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 17 Positive neonatal blood culture.

18 Neonatal necrotising enterocolitis Show forest plot

1

2395

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.46 [0.23, 0.94]

Analysis 2.18

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 18 Neonatal necrotising enterocolitis.

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 18 Neonatal necrotising enterocolitis.

19 Neonatal respiratory distress syndrome Show forest plot

1

2395

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.99 [0.84, 1.16]

Analysis 2.19

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 19 Neonatal respiratory distress syndrome.

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 19 Neonatal respiratory distress syndrome.

20 Treatment with surfactant Show forest plot

1

2395

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.98 [0.81, 1.19]

Analysis 2.20

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 20 Treatment with surfactant.

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 20 Treatment with surfactant.

21 Number of babies requiring ventilation Show forest plot

1

2395

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.00 [0.86, 1.17]

Analysis 2.21

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 21 Number of babies requiring ventilation.

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 21 Number of babies requiring ventilation.

22 Number of babies requiring oxygen therapy Show forest plot

1

2395

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.98 [0.87, 1.10]

Analysis 2.22

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 22 Number of babies requiring oxygen therapy.

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 22 Number of babies requiring oxygen therapy.

23 Neonatal oxygenation > 28 days Show forest plot

1

2395

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.86 [0.66, 1.12]

Analysis 2.23

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 23 Neonatal oxygenation > 28 days.

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 23 Neonatal oxygenation > 28 days.

24 Oxygen treatment > 36 weeks' postconceptual age Show forest plot

1

2395

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.97 [0.70, 1.34]

Analysis 2.24

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 24 Oxygen treatment > 36 weeks' postconceptual age.

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 24 Oxygen treatment > 36 weeks' postconceptual age.

25 Neonatal encephalopathy

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

26 Major cerebral abnormality on ultrasound before discharge Show forest plot

1

2395

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.10 [0.74, 1.63]

Analysis 2.26

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 26 Major cerebral abnormality on ultrasound before discharge.

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 26 Major cerebral abnormality on ultrasound before discharge.

27 Perinatal death/death before discharge Show forest plot

1

2395

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.90 [0.66, 1.23]

Analysis 2.27

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 27 Perinatal death/death before discharge.

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 27 Perinatal death/death before discharge.

28 Serious childhood disability at 7 years Show forest plot

1

1612

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.89 [0.79, 1.01]

Analysis 2.28

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 28 Serious childhood disability at 7 years.

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 28 Serious childhood disability at 7 years.

Open in table viewer
Comparison 4. Antibiotics versus no antibiotic

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Perinatal death/death before discharge Show forest plot

18

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

Analysis 4.1

Comparison 4 Antibiotics versus no antibiotic, Outcome 1 Perinatal death/death before discharge.

Comparison 4 Antibiotics versus no antibiotic, Outcome 1 Perinatal death/death before discharge.

1.1 Antibiotics versus no antibiotics (all studies)

18

6872

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.89 [0.74, 1.08]

1.2 Antibiotics versus no treatment (no placebo)

6

571

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.69 [0.41, 1.14]

Open in table viewer
Comparison 5. 3 versus 7 day ampicillin regimens

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Maternal death

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 Serious maternal morbidity

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3 Major adverse drug reaction

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4 Maternal infection after delivery prior to discharge Show forest plot

1

84

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.25 [0.36, 4.33]

Analysis 5.4

Comparison 5 3 versus 7 day ampicillin regimens, Outcome 4 Maternal infection after delivery prior to discharge.

Comparison 5 3 versus 7 day ampicillin regimens, Outcome 4 Maternal infection after delivery prior to discharge.

5 Chorioamnionitis Show forest plot

1

84

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.73 [0.33, 1.63]

Analysis 5.5

Comparison 5 3 versus 7 day ampicillin regimens, Outcome 5 Chorioamnionitis.

Comparison 5 3 versus 7 day ampicillin regimens, Outcome 5 Chorioamnionitis.

6 Caesarean section Show forest plot

1

84

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.18 [0.72, 1.91]

Analysis 5.6

Comparison 5 3 versus 7 day ampicillin regimens, Outcome 6 Caesarean section.

Comparison 5 3 versus 7 day ampicillin regimens, Outcome 6 Caesarean section.

7 Days from randomisation to birth

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8 Days from birth till discharge of mother

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9 Birth within 48 hours of randomisation Show forest plot

1

84

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.14 [0.46, 2.87]

Analysis 5.9

Comparison 5 3 versus 7 day ampicillin regimens, Outcome 9 Birth within 48 hours of randomisation.

Comparison 5 3 versus 7 day ampicillin regimens, Outcome 9 Birth within 48 hours of randomisation.

10 Birth within 7 days of randomisation Show forest plot

1

84

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.0 [0.70, 1.42]

Analysis 5.10

Comparison 5 3 versus 7 day ampicillin regimens, Outcome 10 Birth within 7 days of randomisation.

Comparison 5 3 versus 7 day ampicillin regimens, Outcome 10 Birth within 7 days of randomisation.

11 Birth before 37 weeks' gestation

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12 Birthweight

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

13 Birthweight < 2500 g

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

14 Neonatal intensive care Show forest plot

1

84

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.0 [0.84, 1.19]

Analysis 5.14

Comparison 5 3 versus 7 day ampicillin regimens, Outcome 14 Neonatal intensive care.

Comparison 5 3 versus 7 day ampicillin regimens, Outcome 14 Neonatal intensive care.

15 Days in neonatal intensive care unit

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16 Neonatal infection including pneumonia

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

17 Positive neonatal blood culture

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

18 Neonatal necrotising enterocolitis Show forest plot

2

130

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.43 [0.07, 2.86]

Analysis 5.18

Comparison 5 3 versus 7 day ampicillin regimens, Outcome 18 Neonatal necrotising enterocolitis.

Comparison 5 3 versus 7 day ampicillin regimens, Outcome 18 Neonatal necrotising enterocolitis.

19 Neonatal respiratory distress syndrome Show forest plot

2

130

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.96 [0.62, 1.49]

Analysis 5.19

Comparison 5 3 versus 7 day ampicillin regimens, Outcome 19 Neonatal respiratory distress syndrome.

Comparison 5 3 versus 7 day ampicillin regimens, Outcome 19 Neonatal respiratory distress syndrome.

20 Treatment with surfactant

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

21 Number of babies requiring ventilation

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

22 Number of babies requiring oxygen therapy

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

23 Neonatal oxygenation > 28 days

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

24 Oxygen treatment > 36 weeks' postconceptual age

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

25 Neonatal encephalopathy

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

26 Neonatal intraventricular haemorrhage Show forest plot

2

130

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.33 [0.04, 3.12]

Analysis 5.26

Comparison 5 3 versus 7 day ampicillin regimens, Outcome 26 Neonatal intraventricular haemorrhage.

Comparison 5 3 versus 7 day ampicillin regimens, Outcome 26 Neonatal intraventricular haemorrhage.

27 Perinatal death/death before discharge Show forest plot

2

130

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.40 [0.05, 2.94]

Analysis 5.27

Comparison 5 3 versus 7 day ampicillin regimens, Outcome 27 Perinatal death/death before discharge.

Comparison 5 3 versus 7 day ampicillin regimens, Outcome 27 Perinatal death/death before discharge.

28 Serious childhood disability at 7 years

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Methodological quality graph: review authors' judgements about each methodological quality item presented as percentages across all included studies.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Methodological quality graph: review authors' judgements about each methodological quality item presented as percentages across all included studies.

Funnel plot of comparison: 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, outcome: 1.3 Perinatal death/death before discharge.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

Funnel plot of comparison: 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, outcome: 1.3 Perinatal death/death before discharge.

Funnel plot of comparison: 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, outcome: 1.4 Neonatal infection including pneumonia.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 3

Funnel plot of comparison: 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, outcome: 1.4 Neonatal infection including pneumonia.

Funnel plot of comparison: 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, outcome: 1.5 Neonatal necrotising enterocolitis.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 4

Funnel plot of comparison: 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, outcome: 1.5 Neonatal necrotising enterocolitis.

Funnel plot of comparison: 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, outcome: 1.7 Major cerebral abnormality on ultrasound before discharge.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 5

Funnel plot of comparison: 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, outcome: 1.7 Major cerebral abnormality on ultrasound before discharge.

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 1 Maternal death.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 1 Maternal death.

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 3 Perinatal death/death before discharge.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 3 Perinatal death/death before discharge.

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 4 Neonatal infection including pneumonia.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 4 Neonatal infection including pneumonia.

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 5 Neonatal necrotising enterocolitis.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 5 Neonatal necrotising enterocolitis.

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 6 Oxygen treatment > 36 weeks' postconceptual age.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 6 Oxygen treatment > 36 weeks' postconceptual age.

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 7 Major cerebral abnormality on ultrasound before discharge.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.7

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 7 Major cerebral abnormality on ultrasound before discharge.

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 8 Birth before 37 weeks' gestation.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.8

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 8 Birth before 37 weeks' gestation.

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 9 Major adverse drug reaction.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.9

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 9 Major adverse drug reaction.

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 10 Maternal infection after delivery prior to discharge.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.10

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 10 Maternal infection after delivery prior to discharge.

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 11 Chorioamnionitis.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.11

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 11 Chorioamnionitis.

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 12 Caesarean section.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.12

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 12 Caesarean section.

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 15 Birth within 48 hours of randomisation.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.15

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 15 Birth within 48 hours of randomisation.

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 16 Birth within 7 days of randomisation.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.16

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 16 Birth within 7 days of randomisation.

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 17 Birthweight.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.17

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 17 Birthweight.

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 18 Birthweight < 2500 g.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.18

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 18 Birthweight < 2500 g.

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 19 Neonatal intensive care.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.19

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 19 Neonatal intensive care.

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 20 Days in neonatal intensive care unit.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.20

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 20 Days in neonatal intensive care unit.

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 21 Positive neonatal blood culture.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.21

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 21 Positive neonatal blood culture.

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 22 Neonatal respiratory distress syndrome.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.22

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 22 Neonatal respiratory distress syndrome.

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 23 Treatment with surfactant.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.23

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 23 Treatment with surfactant.

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 24 Number of babies requiring ventilation.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.24

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 24 Number of babies requiring ventilation.

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 25 Number of babies requiring oxygen therapy.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.25

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 25 Number of babies requiring oxygen therapy.

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 26 Neonatal oxygenation > 28 days.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.26

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 26 Neonatal oxygenation > 28 days.

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 27 Neonatal encephalopathy.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.27

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 27 Neonatal encephalopathy.

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 28 Serious childhood disability at 7 years.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.28

Comparison 1 Any antibiotic versus placebo, Outcome 28 Serious childhood disability at 7 years.

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 3 Major adverse drug reaction.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.3

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 3 Major adverse drug reaction.

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 4 Maternal infection after delivery prior to discharge.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.4

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 4 Maternal infection after delivery prior to discharge.

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 6 Caesarean section.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.6

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 6 Caesarean section.

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 9 Birth within 48 hours of randomisation.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.9

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 9 Birth within 48 hours of randomisation.

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 10 Birth within 7 days of randomisation.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.10

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 10 Birth within 7 days of randomisation.

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 11 Birth before 37 weeks' gestation.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.11

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 11 Birth before 37 weeks' gestation.

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 12 Birthweight.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.12

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 12 Birthweight.

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 13 Birthweight < 2500 g.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.13

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 13 Birthweight < 2500 g.

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 14 Neonatal intensive care.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.14

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 14 Neonatal intensive care.

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 17 Positive neonatal blood culture.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.17

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 17 Positive neonatal blood culture.

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 18 Neonatal necrotising enterocolitis.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.18

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 18 Neonatal necrotising enterocolitis.

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 19 Neonatal respiratory distress syndrome.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.19

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 19 Neonatal respiratory distress syndrome.

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 20 Treatment with surfactant.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.20

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 20 Treatment with surfactant.

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 21 Number of babies requiring ventilation.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.21

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 21 Number of babies requiring ventilation.

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 22 Number of babies requiring oxygen therapy.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.22

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 22 Number of babies requiring oxygen therapy.

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 23 Neonatal oxygenation > 28 days.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.23

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 23 Neonatal oxygenation > 28 days.

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 24 Oxygen treatment > 36 weeks' postconceptual age.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.24

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 24 Oxygen treatment > 36 weeks' postconceptual age.

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 26 Major cerebral abnormality on ultrasound before discharge.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.26

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 26 Major cerebral abnormality on ultrasound before discharge.

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 27 Perinatal death/death before discharge.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.27

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 27 Perinatal death/death before discharge.

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 28 Serious childhood disability at 7 years.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 2.28

Comparison 2 Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav, Outcome 28 Serious childhood disability at 7 years.

Comparison 4 Antibiotics versus no antibiotic, Outcome 1 Perinatal death/death before discharge.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 4.1

Comparison 4 Antibiotics versus no antibiotic, Outcome 1 Perinatal death/death before discharge.

Comparison 5 3 versus 7 day ampicillin regimens, Outcome 4 Maternal infection after delivery prior to discharge.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.4

Comparison 5 3 versus 7 day ampicillin regimens, Outcome 4 Maternal infection after delivery prior to discharge.

Comparison 5 3 versus 7 day ampicillin regimens, Outcome 5 Chorioamnionitis.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.5

Comparison 5 3 versus 7 day ampicillin regimens, Outcome 5 Chorioamnionitis.

Comparison 5 3 versus 7 day ampicillin regimens, Outcome 6 Caesarean section.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.6

Comparison 5 3 versus 7 day ampicillin regimens, Outcome 6 Caesarean section.

Comparison 5 3 versus 7 day ampicillin regimens, Outcome 9 Birth within 48 hours of randomisation.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.9

Comparison 5 3 versus 7 day ampicillin regimens, Outcome 9 Birth within 48 hours of randomisation.

Comparison 5 3 versus 7 day ampicillin regimens, Outcome 10 Birth within 7 days of randomisation.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.10

Comparison 5 3 versus 7 day ampicillin regimens, Outcome 10 Birth within 7 days of randomisation.

Comparison 5 3 versus 7 day ampicillin regimens, Outcome 14 Neonatal intensive care.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.14

Comparison 5 3 versus 7 day ampicillin regimens, Outcome 14 Neonatal intensive care.

Comparison 5 3 versus 7 day ampicillin regimens, Outcome 18 Neonatal necrotising enterocolitis.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.18

Comparison 5 3 versus 7 day ampicillin regimens, Outcome 18 Neonatal necrotising enterocolitis.

Comparison 5 3 versus 7 day ampicillin regimens, Outcome 19 Neonatal respiratory distress syndrome.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.19

Comparison 5 3 versus 7 day ampicillin regimens, Outcome 19 Neonatal respiratory distress syndrome.

Comparison 5 3 versus 7 day ampicillin regimens, Outcome 26 Neonatal intraventricular haemorrhage.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.26

Comparison 5 3 versus 7 day ampicillin regimens, Outcome 26 Neonatal intraventricular haemorrhage.

Comparison 5 3 versus 7 day ampicillin regimens, Outcome 27 Perinatal death/death before discharge.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 5.27

Comparison 5 3 versus 7 day ampicillin regimens, Outcome 27 Perinatal death/death before discharge.

Comparison 1. Any antibiotic versus placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Maternal death Show forest plot

3

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.1 Any antibiotic versus placebo

3

763

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.2 All penicillin (excluding co‐amoxiclav) versus placebo

1

85

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.3 Beta lactum (including co‐amoxiclav) versus placebo 

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.4 Macrolide (including erythromycin) versus placebo

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.5 Other antibiotic versus placebo

2

678

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 Serious maternal morbidity

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

2.1 Any antibiotic versus placebo

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.2 All penicillin (excluding co‐amoxiclav) versus placebo

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.3 Beta lactum (including co‐amoxiclav) versus placebo

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.4 Macrolide (including erythromycin) versus placebo

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.5 Other antibiotic versus placebo

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3 Perinatal death/death before discharge Show forest plot

12

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

3.1 Any antibiotic versus placebo

12

6301

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.93 [0.76, 1.14]

3.2 All penicillin (excluding co‐amoxiclav) versus placebo

4

332

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.78 [0.31, 1.97]

3.3 Beta lactum (including co‐amoxiclav) versus placebo

2

1880

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.62 [0.15, 2.56]

3.4 Macrolide (including erythromycin) versus placebo

4

2138

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.83 [0.43, 1.60]

3.5 Other antibiotic versus placebo

3

762

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.13 [0.68, 1.88]

4 Neonatal infection including pneumonia Show forest plot

12

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

4.1 Any antibiotic versus placebo

12

1680

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.67 [0.52, 0.85]

4.2 All penicillin (excluding co‐amoxiclav) versus placebo

5

521

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.30 [0.13, 0.68]

4.3 Beta lactum (including co‐amoxiclav) versus placebo

1

62

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.33 [0.01, 7.88]

4.4 Macrolide (including erythromycin) versus placebo

3

334

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.79 [0.45, 1.37]

4.5 Other antibiotic versus placebo

3

763

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.71 [0.53, 0.95]

5 Neonatal necrotising enterocolitis Show forest plot

11

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

5.1 Any antibiotic versus placebo

11

6229

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.09 [0.65, 1.83]

5.2 All penicillin (excluding co‐amoxiclav) versus placebo

3

262

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.85 [0.25, 2.97]

5.3 Beta lactum (including co‐amoxiclav) versus placebo

2

1880

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

4.72 [1.57, 14.23]

5.4 Macrolide (including erythromycin) versus placebo

3

2076

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.88 [0.45, 1.69]

5.5 Other antibiotic versus placebo

4

823

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.89 [0.54, 1.47]

6 Oxygen treatment > 36 weeks' postconceptual age Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

6.1 Any antibiotic versus placebo

1

4809

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.91 [0.70, 1.17]

6.2 All penicillin (excluding co‐amoxiclav) versus placebo

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.3 Beta lactum (including co‐amoxiclav) versus placebo

1

1818

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.92 [0.63, 1.36]

6.4 Macrolide (including erythromycin) versus placebo

1

1803

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.89 [0.61, 1.32]

6.5 Other antibiotic versus placebo

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7 Major cerebral abnormality on ultrasound before discharge Show forest plot

12

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

7.1 Any antibiotic versus placebo

12

6289

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.81 [0.68, 0.98]

7.2 All penicillin (excluding co‐amoxiclav) versus placebo 

3

262

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.49 [0.25, 0.96]

7.3 Beta lactum (including co‐amoxiclav) versus placebo

2

1880

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.78 [0.52, 1.16]

7.4 Macrolide (including erythromycin) versus placebo 

4

2136

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.93 [0.60, 1.44]

7.5 Other antibiotic versus placebo

4

823

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.85 [0.45, 1.64]

8 Birth before 37 weeks' gestation Show forest plot

3

4931

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.00 [0.98, 1.03]

9 Major adverse drug reaction Show forest plot

3

5487

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

10 Maternal infection after delivery prior to discharge Show forest plot

4

5547

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.91 [0.80, 1.02]

11 Chorioamnionitis Show forest plot

11

1559

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.66 [0.46, 0.96]

12 Caesarean section Show forest plot

11

6317

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.96 [0.88, 1.05]

13 Days from birth till discharge of mother

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

14 Days from randomisation to birth

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

15 Birth within 48 hours of randomisation Show forest plot

7

5927

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.71 [0.58, 0.87]

16 Birth within 7 days of randomisation Show forest plot

7

5965

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.79 [0.71, 0.89]

17 Birthweight Show forest plot

12

6374

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

53.83 [7.06, 100.60]

18 Birthweight < 2500 g Show forest plot

2

4876

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.00 [0.96, 1.04]

19 Neonatal intensive care Show forest plot

4

5023

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.98 [0.84, 1.13]

20 Days in neonatal intensive care unit Show forest plot

3

225

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐5.05 [‐9.77, ‐0.33]

21 Positive neonatal blood culture Show forest plot

3

4961

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.79 [0.63, 0.99]

22 Neonatal respiratory distress syndrome Show forest plot

12

6287

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.95 [0.83, 1.09]

23 Treatment with surfactant Show forest plot

1

4809

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.83 [0.72, 0.96]

24 Number of babies requiring ventilation Show forest plot

2

4924

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.90 [0.80, 1.02]

25 Number of babies requiring oxygen therapy Show forest plot

1

4809

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.88 [0.81, 0.96]

26 Neonatal oxygenation > 28 days Show forest plot

3

5487

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.79 [0.61, 1.03]

27 Neonatal encephalopathy Show forest plot

1

60

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

28 Serious childhood disability at 7 years Show forest plot

1

3171

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.91, 1.12]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Any antibiotic versus placebo
Comparison 2. Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Maternal death

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 Serious maternal morbidity

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3 Major adverse drug reaction Show forest plot

1

2395

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4 Maternal infection after delivery prior to discharge Show forest plot

1

2395

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.02 [0.87, 1.20]

5 Chorioamnionitis

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6 Caesarean section Show forest plot

1

2395

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.02 [0.90, 1.16]

7 Days from randomisation to birth

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8 Days from birth till discharge of mother

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9 Birth within 48 hours of randomisation Show forest plot

1

2395

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.14 [1.02, 1.28]

10 Birth within 7 days of randomisation Show forest plot

1

2395

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.06 [0.99, 1.13]

11 Birth before 37 weeks' gestation Show forest plot

1

2395

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.99 [0.96, 1.03]

12 Birthweight Show forest plot

1

2395

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

19.0 [‐41.92, 79.92]

13 Birthweight < 2500 g Show forest plot

1

2395

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.00 [0.95, 1.05]

14 Neonatal intensive care Show forest plot

1

2395

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.00 [0.95, 1.05]

15 Days in neonatal intensive care unit

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16 Neonatal infection including pneumonia

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

17 Positive neonatal blood culture Show forest plot

1

2395

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.84 [0.62, 1.15]

18 Neonatal necrotising enterocolitis Show forest plot

1

2395

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.46 [0.23, 0.94]

19 Neonatal respiratory distress syndrome Show forest plot

1

2395

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.99 [0.84, 1.16]

20 Treatment with surfactant Show forest plot

1

2395

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.98 [0.81, 1.19]

21 Number of babies requiring ventilation Show forest plot

1

2395

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.00 [0.86, 1.17]

22 Number of babies requiring oxygen therapy Show forest plot

1

2395

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.98 [0.87, 1.10]

23 Neonatal oxygenation > 28 days Show forest plot

1

2395

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.86 [0.66, 1.12]

24 Oxygen treatment > 36 weeks' postconceptual age Show forest plot

1

2395

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.97 [0.70, 1.34]

25 Neonatal encephalopathy

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

26 Major cerebral abnormality on ultrasound before discharge Show forest plot

1

2395

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.10 [0.74, 1.63]

27 Perinatal death/death before discharge Show forest plot

1

2395

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.90 [0.66, 1.23]

28 Serious childhood disability at 7 years Show forest plot

1

1612

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.89 [0.79, 1.01]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 2. Erythromycin versus co‐amoxiclav
Comparison 4. Antibiotics versus no antibiotic

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Perinatal death/death before discharge Show forest plot

18

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.1 Antibiotics versus no antibiotics (all studies)

18

6872

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.89 [0.74, 1.08]

1.2 Antibiotics versus no treatment (no placebo)

6

571

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.69 [0.41, 1.14]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 4. Antibiotics versus no antibiotic
Comparison 5. 3 versus 7 day ampicillin regimens

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Maternal death

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 Serious maternal morbidity

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3 Major adverse drug reaction

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4 Maternal infection after delivery prior to discharge Show forest plot

1

84

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.25 [0.36, 4.33]

5 Chorioamnionitis Show forest plot

1

84

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.73 [0.33, 1.63]

6 Caesarean section Show forest plot

1

84

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.18 [0.72, 1.91]

7 Days from randomisation to birth

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8 Days from birth till discharge of mother

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

9 Birth within 48 hours of randomisation Show forest plot

1

84

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.14 [0.46, 2.87]

10 Birth within 7 days of randomisation Show forest plot

1

84

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.0 [0.70, 1.42]

11 Birth before 37 weeks' gestation

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

12 Birthweight

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

13 Birthweight < 2500 g

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

14 Neonatal intensive care Show forest plot

1

84

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.0 [0.84, 1.19]

15 Days in neonatal intensive care unit

0

0

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

16 Neonatal infection including pneumonia

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

17 Positive neonatal blood culture

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

18 Neonatal necrotising enterocolitis Show forest plot

2

130

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.43 [0.07, 2.86]

19 Neonatal respiratory distress syndrome Show forest plot

2

130

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.96 [0.62, 1.49]

20 Treatment with surfactant

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

21 Number of babies requiring ventilation

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

22 Number of babies requiring oxygen therapy

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

23 Neonatal oxygenation > 28 days

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

24 Oxygen treatment > 36 weeks' postconceptual age

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

25 Neonatal encephalopathy

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

26 Neonatal intraventricular haemorrhage Show forest plot

2

130

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.33 [0.04, 3.12]

27 Perinatal death/death before discharge Show forest plot

2

130

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.40 [0.05, 2.94]

28 Serious childhood disability at 7 years

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 5. 3 versus 7 day ampicillin regimens