Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Memantina para la demencia

This is not the most recent version

Information

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003154.pub5Copy DOI
Database:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Version published:
  1. 19 April 2006see what's new
Type:
  1. Intervention
Stage:
  1. Review
Cochrane Editorial Group:
  1. Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2009 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Article metrics

Altmetric:

Cited by:

Cited 0 times via Crossref Cited-by Linking

Collapse

Authors

Contributions of authors

‐AAS: drafting of earlier review versions, search for trials, obtaining copies of trial reports, selection of trials for inclusion/exclusion; extraction of data, entry of data, interpretation of data analysis
‐RM: drafting of review version, identification of trials, obtaining copies of trial reports, extraction of data, entry of data, data analysis, interpretation
‐NM: search for trials, extracted data, data entry, data analysis

‐Jacqueline Birks assisted in the selection of trials for inclusion and exclusion and checked the analyses
‐Dymphna Hermans : performed the searches
‐Contact editor: Lon Schneider
‐Consumer editor: Corinne Cavender

The first version of this review was peer reviewed anonymously
The April 05 update of this review was peer reviewed

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • Cochrane Dementia & Cognitive Improvement Group, UK.

External sources

  • Alzheimer's Society, UK.

Declaraciones de interés

available in

No existe ningún conflicto de interés conocido. RM ganó un premio seleccionado al azar de menos de £500 por asistir a dos sesiones consecutivas temprano a la mañana que patrocinó Merz y Lundbeck en la reunión de IPA de 2005 en Estocolmo.

Agradecimientos

available in

Los autores agradecen a Corinne Cavender sus aportaciones como editora de los consumidores.
Se agradece a Merz por haber proporcionado un análisis no publicado de evaluaciones globales de cambio y puntuaciones NOSGER del 9202/Wilcock 2002.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2019 Mar 20

Memantine for dementia

Review

Rupert McShane, Maggie J Westby, Emmert Roberts, Neda Minakaran, Lon Schneider, Lucy E Farrimond, Nicola Maayan, Jennifer Ware, Jean Debarros

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003154.pub6

2006 Apr 19

Memantine for dementia

Review

Rupert McShane, Almudena Areosa Sastre, Neda Minakaran

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003154.pub5

2005 Jul 20

Memantine for dementia

Review

Almudena Areosa Sastre, Fiona Sherriff, Rupert McShane

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003154.pub3

2005 Jul 20

Memantine for dementia

Review

Almudena Areosa Sastre, Fiona Sherriff, Rupert McShane

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003154.pub4

2004 Oct 18

Memantine for dementia

Review

Almudena Areosa Sastre, Fiona Sherriff

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003154.pub2

2003 Jul 21

Memantine for dementia

Review

Almudena Areosa Sastre, Fiona Sherriff

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003154

PICOs

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

The PICO model is widely used and taught in evidence-based health care as a strategy for formulating questions and search strategies and for characterizing clinical studies or meta-analyses. PICO stands for four different potential components of a clinical question: Patient, Population or Problem; Intervention; Comparison; Outcome.

See more on using PICO in the Cochrane Handbook.