Motor neuroprosthesis for promoting recovery of function after stroke
Referencias
Additional references
Ambrosini E, Ferrante S, Pedrocchi A, Ferrigno G, Molteni F. Cycling induced by electrical stimulation improves motor recovery in postacute hemiparetic patients: a randomized controlled trial. Stroke 2011;42(4):1068‐73.
Ambrosini E, Bejarano NC, Pedrocchi A. Sensors for motor neuroprosthetics: current applications and future directions. In: Naik GR, Guo Y editor(s). Emerging Theory and Practice in Neuroprosthetics. Hershey (USA): IGI Global, 2014.
Anderson C, Laubscher S, Burns R. Validation of the Short Form 36 (SF‐36) health survey questionnaire among stroke patients. Stroke 1996;27(10):1812–6.
Atkins D, Best D, Briss PA, Eccles M, Falck‐Ytter Y, Flottorp S, et al. GRADE Working Group. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2004;328(7454):1490.
Auchstaetter N, Luc J, Lukye S, Lynd K, Schemenauer S, Whittaker M, et al. Physical therapists’ use of functional electrical stimulation for clients with stroke: frequency, barriers, and facilitators. Physical Therapy 2016;96:995‐1005.
Baer HR, Wolf SL. Modified memory functional ambulation profile: an outcome measure for the rehabilitation of poststroke gait dysfunction. Stroke 2001;32(4):973‐9.
Berg KO, Wood‐Dauphinee SL, Williams JI, Maki B. Measuring balance in the elderly: validation of an instrument. Canadian Journal of Public Health 1992;83 Suppl 2:S7‐11.
Bethoux F, Rogers HL, Nolan KJ, Abrams GM, Annaswamy T, Brandstater M, et al. Long‐term follow‐up to a randomized controlled trial comparing peroneal nerve functional electrical stimulation to an ankle foot orthosis for patients with chronic stroke. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 2015;29(10):911‐22.
Bolton DAE, Cauraugh JH, Hausenblas HA. Electromyogram‐triggered neuromuscular stimulation and stroke motor recovery of arm/hand functions: a meta‐analysis. Journal of the Neurological Sciences 2004;223(2):121‐7.
Bosch PR, Harris JE, Wing K. Review of therapeutic electrical stimulation for dorsiflexion assist and orthotic substitution from the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Stroke Movement Interventions Subcommittee. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2014;95(2):390‐6.
Brehm M, Bus SA, Harlaar J, Nollet F. A candidate core set of outcome measures based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health for clinical studies on lower limb orthoses. Prosthetics and Orthotics International 2011;35(3):269‐77.
Cambridge NA. Electrical apparatus used in medicine before 1900. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine 1977;70:635‐41.
Collen FM, Wade DT, Robb GF, Bradshaw CM. The Rivermead Mobility Index: a further development of the Rivermead Motor Assessment. International Disability Studies 1991;13(2):50‐4.
Collinger JL, Foldes S, Bruns TM, Wodlinger B, Gaunt R, Weber DJ. Neuroprosthetic technology for individuals with spinal cord injury. Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine 2013;36(4):258‐72.
Cowan RE, Fregly BJ, Boninger ML, Chan L, Rodgers MM, Reinkensmeyer DJ. Recent trends in assistive technology for mobility. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 2012;9:20.
de Campos LM, Martins BM, Cabral NL, Franco SC, Pontes‐Neto OM, Mazin SC, et al. How many patients become functionally dependent after a stroke? A 3‐year population based study in Joinville, Brazil. PLoS ONE 2017;12(1):e0170204.
Dean C, Mackey F. Motor assessment scale scores as a measure of rehabilitation outcome foIIowing stroke. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy 1992;38(1):31‐5.
Duncan PW, Wallace D, Lai SM, Johnson D, Embretson S, Laster LJ. The stroke impact scale version 2.0. Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Stroke 1999;30(10):2131‐40.
Dunning KO, Dell MW, Kluding P, McBride K. Peroneal stimulation for foot drop after stroke: a systematic review. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2015;94(8):649‐64.
Eng JJ, Tang PF. Gait training strategies to optimize walking ability in people with stroke: a synthesis of the evidence. Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics 2007;7(10):1417‐36.
Everaert DG, Thompson AK, Chong SL, Stein RB. Does functional electrical stimulation for foot drop strengthen corticospinal connections?. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 2010;24(2):168‐77.
Feigin VL, Forouzanfar MH, Krishnamurthi R, Mensah GA, Connor M, Bennett DA, et al. Global and regional burden of stroke during 1990‐2010: findings from the global burden of disease study 2010. Lancet 2014;383(9913):245‐55.
McMaster University (developed by Evidence Prime). GRADEpro GDT. Hamilton (ON): McMaster University (developed by Evidence Prime), 2015.
Hamilton BB, Laughlin JA, Fiedler RC, Granger CV. Interrater reliability of the 7‐level functional independence measure (FIM). Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 1994;26(3):115‐9.
Hatano S. Experience from a multicentre stroke register: a preliminary report. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 1976;54:3550‐3.
Heller A, Wade DT, Wood VA, Sunderland A, Hewer RL, Ward E. Arm function after stroke: measurements and recovery over the first three months. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 1987;50:714‐9.
Higgins JP, Deeks JJ, editor(s). Chapter 7: Selecting studies and collecting data. In: Higgins JP, Green S, editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from handbook.cochrane.org.
Higgins JP, Altman DG, Sterne JA, editor(s). Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JP, Green S, editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.handbook.cochrane.org.
Deeks JJ, Higgins JPT, Altman DG, editor(s). Chapter 9: Analysing data and undertaking meta‐analyses. In: Higgins JP, Green S, editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.handbook.cochrane.org.
Higgins JPT, Deeks JJ, Altman DG, editor(s). Chapter 16: Special topics in statistics. In: Higgins JP, Green S, editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.handbook.cochrane.org.
Holden MK, Gill KM, Magliozzi MR, Nathan J, Piehl‐Baker L. Clinical gait assessment in the neurologically impaired. Reliability and meaningfulness. Physical Therapy 1984;64:35‐40.
Horch KW, Dhillon GS, editor(s). Neuroprosthetics: theory and practice. Vol. 2, Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co, 2004.
Jonsdottir J, Cattaneo D. Reliability and validity of the dynamic gait index in persons with chronic stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2007;88(11):1410‐5.
Kluding PM, Dunning K, O'Dell MW, Wu SS, Ginosian J, Feld J, et al. Foot drop stimulation versus ankle foot orthosis after stroke. Stroke 2014;44:1660‐9.
Kottink AI, Oostendorp LJ, Buurke JH, Nene AV, Hermens HJ, IJzerman MJ. The orthotic effect of functional electrical stimulation on the improvement of walking in stroke patients with a dropped foot: a systematic review. Artificial Organs 2004;28(6):577‐86.
Lang CE, Bland MD, Bailey RR, Schaefer SY, Birkenmeier RL. Assessment of upper extremity impairment, function, and activity following stroke: foundations for clinical decision making. Journal of Hand Therapy 2013;26(2):104‐15.
Langhorne P, Coupar F, Pollock A. Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Lancet Neurology 2009;8(8):741‐54.
Laufer Y, Hausddorff JM, Ring H. Effects of a foot drop neuroprosthesis on functional abilities, social participation and gait velocity. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2009;88:14‐20.
Lefebvre C, Manheimer E, Glanville J. Chapter 6: Searching for studies In: Higgins JP, Green S, editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.handbook.cochrane.org.
Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta‐analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Medicine 2009;6(7):e1000100.
Liberson WT, Holmquest HJ, Scot D, Dow M. Functional electrotherapy: stimulation of the peroneal nerve synchronized with the swing phase of the gait of hemiplegic patients. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1961;42:101‐5.
Martin R, Sadowsky C, Obst K, Meyer B, McDonald J. Functional electrical stimulation in spinal cord injury: from theory to practice. Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation 2012;18(1):28‐33.
Martins EF, de Menezes LT, de Sousa PH, de Araujo Barbosa PH, Costa AS. Reliability of the Functional Reach Test and the influence of anthropometric characteristics on test results in subjects with hemiparesis. NeuroRehabilitation 2012;31(2):161‐9.
Mathiowetz V, Volland G, Kashman N, Weber K. Adult norms for the box and block test of manual dexterity. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 1985;39(6):386‐91.
Meilink A, Hemmen B, Seelen HA, Kwakkel G. Impact of EMG‐triggered neuromuscular stimulation of the wrist and finger extensors of the paretic hand after stroke: a systematic review of the literature. Clinical Rehabilitation 2008;22(4):291‐305.
Melo PL, Silva MT, Martins JM, Newman DJ. Technical developments of functional electrical stimulation to correct drop foot: sensing, actuation and control strategies. Clinical Biomechanics 2015;30(2):101‐13.
Moss CW, Kilgore KL, Peckham PH. A novel command signal for motor neuroprosthetic control. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 2011;25(9):847‐54.
Mudge S, Stott NS. Outcome measures to assess walking ability following stroke: a systematic review of the literature. Physiotherapy 2007;93:189‐200.
Naik GR, Guo Y. Emerging Theory and Practice in Neuroprosthetics. Hershey (USA): IGI Global, 2014.
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). NICE interventional procedure guidance (IPG 278). Functional electrical stimulation for drop foot of central neurological origin [2009]. www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ipg278.
Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed "up & go": a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 1991;14(2):142‐8.
Popović DB. Advances in functional electrical stimulation (FES). Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology 2014;24(6):795‐802.
Prenton S, Hollands KL, Kenney LPJ. Functional electrical stimulation versus ankle foot orthoses for foot‐drop: a meta‐analysis of orthotic effects. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 2016;48:646‐56.
Quinn TJ, Langhorne P, Stott DJ. Barthel index for stroke trials development, properties, and application. Stroke 2011;42(4):1146‐51.
Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager 5 (RevMan 5). Version 5.3. Copenhagen: Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014.
Roth GA, Johnson C, Abajobir A, Abd‐Allah F, Abera SF, Abyu G, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of cardiovascular diseases for 10 causes, 1990 to 2015. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2017;70(1):1‐25.
Schiemanck SK, Kwakkel G, Marcel WM, Kappelle LJ, Prevo AJH. Predicting long‐term independency in activities of daily living after middle cerebral artery stroke: does information from MRI have added predictive value compared with clinical information?. Stroke 2006;37(4):1050‐4.
Seale H. Six minute walking test. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy 2006;52(3):228.
Sheffler LR, Chae J. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation in neurorehabilitation. Muscle and Nerve 2007;35:562‐90.
Sheffler LR, Hennessey MT, Knutson JS, Chae J. Neuroprosthetic effect of peroneal nerve stimulation in multiple sclerosis: a preliminary study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2009;90(2):362‐5.
Stein RB, Rolf R, Everaert DG, Bobet J, Chong SL. Surface electrical stimulation for foot drop: control aspects and walking performance. Journal of Automatic Control 2008;18(2):47‐52.
Stern EB. Stability of the Jebsen‐Taylor hand function test across three test sessions. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 1992;46(7):647‐9.
Sullivan JE, Crowner BE, Kluding PM, Nichols D, Rose DK, Yoshida R, et al. Outcome measures for individuals with stroke: process and recommendations from the American Physical Therapy Association Neurology Section Task Force. Physical Therapy 2013;93:1383‐96.
Thibaut A, Moissenet F, Di Perri C, Schreiber C, Remacle A, Kolanowski E, et al. Brain plasticity after implanted peroneal nerve electrical stimulation to improve gait in chronic stroke patients: two case reports. NeuroRehabilitation 2017;40(2):251‐8.
Uswatte G, Taub E, Morris D, Vignolo M, McCulloch K. Reliability and validity of the upper‐extremity motor activity log‐14 for measuring real‐world arm use. Stroke 2005;36:2493‐6.
Van der Lee JH, De Groot V, Beckerman H, Wagenaar RC, Lankhorst GJ, Bouter LM. The intra‐ and interrater reliability of the action research arm test: a practical test of upper extremity function in patients with stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine Rehabilitation 2001;82:14‐9.
World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2001.
Wolf SL. A method for quantifying ambulatory activities. Physical Therapy Journal 1979;59(6):767‐8.
Wolf SL, Catlin PA, Ellis M, Archer AL, Morgan B, Piacentino A. Assessing Wolf Motor Function Test as outcome measure for research in patients after stroke. Stroke 2001;32:1635‐9.
Ziat M, Bensmaia S. Neuroprosthetics. In: Wright JD editor(s). International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2nd Edition. Oxford: Elsevier Ltd, 2015.
| Motor neuroprosthesis for promoting recovery of function after stroke Participants or population: people with stroke Setting: community or home setting Intervention: motor neuroprosthesis Comparison: no treatment | ||||||
| Outcomes | Illustrative comparative risks (95% CI) | Relative effect (95% CI) | No of participants (studies) | Quality of the evidence (GRADE) | Comments | |
| Assumed risk No treatment | Corresponding Motor prosthesis | |||||
| Independence in activities of daily living | ||||||
| Activities involving limbs | ||||||
| Participation | ||||||
| Exercise capacity | ||||||
| Balance | ||||||
| Adverse events | ||||||
| CI: confidence interval | ||||||
Figuras y tablas -
Table 1. Template for 'Summary of findings' table
