Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Mobile‐based technologies to support client to healthcare provider communication and management of care

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012928Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 18 enero 2018see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Protocol
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Práctica y organización sanitaria efectivas

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2018 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Daniela C Gonçalves‐Bradley

    Correspondencia a: Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

    [email protected]

  • Brian S Buckley

    Department of Surgery, University of Phillipines, Manila, Philippines

  • Marita S Fønhus

    Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway

  • Claire Glenton

    Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway

  • Nicholas Henschke

    Cochrane Response, Cochrane, London, UK

  • Simon Lewin

    Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway

    Health Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Tygerberg, South Africa

  • Nicola Maayan

    Cochrane Response, Cochrane, London, UK

  • Garrett L Mehl

    Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland

  • Tigest Tamrat

    Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland

  • Sasha Shepperd

    Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

Contributions of authors

Conceiving and designing the protocol: MF, DGB, CG, SL, GM, SS, TT

Co‐ordinating the protocol: DGB, SS

Writing the protocol: DGB, SS

Providing general advice on the protocol: BB, MF, CG, SL, NH, GM, NM, TT

Securing funding for the protocol: GM, TT

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • National Institute of Health Research, UK.

External sources

  • UNDP‐UNFPA‐UNICEF‐WHO‐World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), a cosponsored program executed by the World Health Organization (WHO), Switzerland.

    Provided funding for the review

Declarations of interest

DGB: I was commissioned by the WHO to conduct this review.
BB: none known.
MF: none known.
CG: none known.
NH: Since June 2016 I have been employed by Cochrane Response, an evidence services unit operated by the Cochrane Collaboration. Cochrane Response was contracted by the WHO to produce this review.
SL: I am the Joint Co‐ordinating Editor for the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Review Group.

NM: I previously worked for Enhanced Reviews Ltd, a company that conducts systematic reviews mostly for the public sector. Since June 2016 I have be employed by Cochrane Response, an evidence services unit operated by the Cochrane Collaboration. Cochrane Response was contracted by the WHO to produce this review.
GM: owns stock in Apple Computer.
TT: none known.
SS: none known.

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the help and support of Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC), through the editorial input of the following editors and peer referees who provided comments to improve the protocol: Julia Worswick (EPOC managing editor); Paul Miller (EPOC information specialist); Gillian Leng (EPOC contact editor); and Marco Bardus (external referee). The authors would also like to thank John Eyers for designing the search strategies and Ann Jones for copy‐editing the protocol.

National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), via Cochrane Infrastructure funding to the Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) Group. The views and opinions expressed therein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Systematic Reviews Programme, NIHR, National Health Service (NHS), or the Department of Health.

We are grateful to the Guideline Development Group of the Digital Health Guidelines (World Health Organization) for their constructive feedback in formulating the guiding questions for this systematic review.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2018 Jan 18

Mobile‐based technologies to support client to healthcare provider communication and management of care

Protocol

Daniela C Gonçalves‐Bradley, Brian S Buckley, Marita S Fønhus, Claire Glenton, Nicholas Henschke, Simon Lewin, Nicola Maayan, Garrett L Mehl, Tigest Tamrat, Sasha Shepperd

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012928

Notes

This protocol is based on standard text and guidance provided by Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC).

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.