Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Random drug and alcohol testing for preventing injury in workers

Esta versión no es la más reciente

ver la versión actual 27 diciembre 2020

Referencias

Additional references

AADAC 2003

Alberta Alcohol and Drug Abuse Commission. Substance use and gambling in the Alberta workplace, 2002: a replication study. Available at: archive.org/details/substanceusegambalbe_0. AADAC Research Services (Canada), 2003. [ISBN 0‐7785‐2895‐2]

ACCA 2010

Atlantic Canada Council on Addiction. Problematic substance use that impacts the workplace: a step‐by‐step guide & toolkit to addressing it in your business/organization. http://www.gov.pe.ca/photos/original/hpei%5Faddic%5Fkit.pdf 2010 (accessed 17 November 2017).

Agius 2010

Agius R, Kintz P. Guidelines for European workplace drug and alcohol testing in hair. Drug Testing and Analysis 2010;2:367‐76. [DOI: 10.1002/dta.147]

AHRC 2012

Alberta Human Rights Commission. Drug and alcohol dependencies in Alberta workplaces information sheet. www.albertahumanrights.ab.ca/Documents/Drug_and_alcohol_dependencies.pdf (Accessed 17 November 2017). [www.albertahumanrights.ab.ca/Documents/Drug_and_alcohol_dependencies.pdf]

Anderson 2011

Anderson LM, Petticrew M, Rehfuess E, Armstrong R, Ueffing E, Baker P, et al. Using logic models to capture complexity in systematic reviews. Research Synthesis Methods 2011;2(1):33‐42. [DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.32]

Baxter 2010

Baxter S, Killoran A, Kelly MP, Goyder E. Synthesizing diverse evidence: the use of primary qualitative data analysis methods and logic models in public health reviews. Public Health 2010;124(2):99‐106. [DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2010.01.002]

Bernal 2017

Bernal JL, Cummins S, Gasparrini A. Interrupted time series regression for the evaluation of public health interventions: a tutorial. International Journal of Epidemiology 2017;46(1):348‐55.

Binch 2007

Binch S, Bell J. The cost of non‐injury accidents scoping study. UK; Health and Safety Executive; 2007. Research Report RR585. Available at: http://www.hse.gov.uk/research/rrpdf/rr585.pdf.

Borack 1998

Borack JI. An estimate of the impact of drug testing on the deterrence of drug use. Military Psychology 1998;10(1):17‐25. [DOI: 10.1207/s15327876mp1001_2]

Brady 2009

Brady JE, Baker SP, Dimaggio C, McCarthy ML, Rebok GW, Li G. Effectiveness of mandatory alcohol testing programs in reducing alcohol involvement in fatal motor carrier crashes. American Journal of Epidemiology 2009;170(6):775‐82. [DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwp202]

Brown 2013

Brown D, Bowden‐Jones H. Drugs and alcohol in the workplace. In: Palmer KT, Brown I, Hobson J editor(s). Fitness for Work: The Medical Aspects. 5th Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013:490‐506.

Bush 2015

Bush DM, Lipari RN. The CBHSQ report: Substance use and substance use disorder by industry. www.samhsa.gov/data/sites/default/files/report_1959/ShortReport‐1959.html 16 April 2015 (accessed 17 November 2017).

Campbell 2001

Campbell MK, Mollison J, Grimshaw JM. Cluster trials in implementation research: estimation of intracluster correlation coefficients and sample size. Statistics in Medicine 2001;20(3):391‐9. [DOI: 10.1002/1097‐0258(20010215)20:3<391::AID‐SIM800>3.0.CO;2‐Z]

Cashman 2009

Cashman CM, Ruotsalainen JH, Greiner BA, Berrne PV, Verbeek JH. Alcohol and drug screening of occupational drivers for preventing injury. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009, Issue 2. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006566.pub2]

Cenovus 2011

Cenovus Vice‐President, Health & Safety. Alcohol & drug practice. www.cenovus.com/contractor/docs/health‐safety‐practices/alcohol‐and‐drug‐practice.pdf June 2011 (accessed 17 November 2017).

Chau 2009

Chau N, Bhattacherjee A, Kunar BM. Relationship between job, lifestyle, age and occupational injuries. Occupational Medicine 2009;59(2):114‐9. [DOI: 10.1093/occmed/kqp002]

CHRC 2017

Canadian Human Rights Commission. Impaired at work: a guide to accommodating substance dependence. Available at: www.chrc‐ccdp.gc.ca/sites/default/files/impaired_at_work.pdf. Ottawa (ON): Canadian Human Rights Commission, 2017. [ 978‐0‐660‐07799‐4]

CIPD 2007

Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development. Managing drug and alcohol misuse at work: A guide for people management professionals. http://www2.cipd.co.uk/NR/rdonlyres/EFE87A7D‐B088‐43C0‐A0B5‐B6F71DA1E678/0/mandrgalcmisuseg.PDF (accessed 17 November 2017)2007.

CLR 2017

Construction Labour Relations. Information for worker applicants about the Rapid Site Access Program (RSAP). clra.org/uploads/agreements/04‐05‐17%20RSAP%20Program%20Overview%20for%20Worker.pdf (accessed 16 November 2017).

COAA 2014

Construction Owners Association of Alberta. Canadian model for providing a safe workplace: Alcohol and drug guidelines and work rule. Alcohol and Drug Guidelines and Work Rule Version 5.0. www.coaa.ab.ca/COAA‐Library/SAF‐CDM‐CBP‐01‐2014‐v5%20Canadian%20Model.pdf 8 October 2014 (accessed 17 November 2017).

Coates 2014

Coates CW, Eisele GR. Human Reliability Implementation Guide. http://info.ornl.gov/sites/publications/files/Pub50899.pdf (accessed May 30, 2017) 1 August 2014.

Cook 2003

Cook RF, Back AS, Trudeau, J, McPherson T. Integrating substance abuse prevention into health promotion programs in the workplace: A social cognitive intervention targeting the mainstream user. In: Bennet JB, Lehman WEK editor(s). Preventing workplace substance abuse: Beyond drug testing to wellness. Washington (DC): American Psychological Association, 2003. [978‐1‐55798‐936‐9]

Dong 2015

Dong XS, Wang X, Largay JA. Occupational and non‐occupational factors associated with work‐related injuries among construction workers in the USA. International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health 2015;21(2):142‐50. [DOI: 10.1179/2049396714Y.0000000107]

Dyck 2013

Dyck DEG. Disability Management: Theory, Strategy & Industry Practice. 5th Edition. Canada: LexisNexis, 2013.

Ehnes 2012

Ehnes H. Improvement of national reporting, data collection and analysis of occupational accidents and diseases. Geneva: International Labour Organization; 2012 December. Available at: www.ilo.org/safework/info/publications/WCMS_207414/lang‐‐en/index.htm. [978‐92‐2‐126817‐8 ]

ELPG 2017

Employment and Labour Practice Group. Ontario court dismisses injunction to restrain random drug and alcohol testing. www.osler.com/en/resources/governance/2017/ontario‐court‐dismisses‐injunction‐to‐restrain‐ran (accessed 12 June 12 2017).

Els 2016

Els C, Amin A, Straube S. Marijuana and the workplace. Canadian Journal of Addiction 2016;7(4):5‐7. [2368‐4739]

Employment New Zealand 2017

Ministry of Business, Innovation, Employment. Drugs, alcohol and work. https://www.employment.govt.nz/workplace‐policies/tests‐and‐checks/drugs‐alcohol‐and‐work/ (accessed November 17, 2017)2017.

EPOC 2017a

Cochrane Effective Practice, Organisation of Care. What study designs should be included in an EPOC review and what should they be called?. epoc.cochrane.org/epoc‐resources‐review‐authors (accessed 16 November 2017).

EPOC 2017b

Cochrane Effective Practice, Organisation of Care. Suggested risk of bias criteria for EPOC reviews. epoc.cochrane.org/resources/epoc‐res ources‐review‐authors (accessed 16 November 2017).

Frone 2013

Frone MR. Alcohol and Illicit Drug Use in the Workforce and Workplace. Washington (DC): American Psychological Association, 2013.

Golan 2010

Golan M, Bacharach Y, Bamberger P. Peer assistance programs in the workplace. In: Houdmont J, Leka S editor(s). Contemporary Occupational Health Psychology: Global Perspectives on Research and Practice. Malden: Wiley‐Blackwell, 2010:169‐87.

Guerra‐Doce 2015

Guerra‐Doce E. Psychoactive substances in prehistoric times: examining the archaeological evidence. The Journal of Archaeology, Consciousness and Culture 2015;8(1):91‐112. [DOI: 10.1080/1751696X.2014.993244]

Hammond 2015

Hammond H, Malec JF, Todd N, Buschbacher RM, editor(s). Handbook for Clinical Research: Design, Statistics, and Implementation. New York (NY): Demos Medical Publishing, LLC, 2015. [ISBN: 978‐1‐6170‐5099‐2]

Hegmann 2014

Hegmann K, Weiss M, Bowden M, Branco F, DuBrueler K, Els C, et al. Opioids and safety‐sensitive work: the ACOEM practice guidelines. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2014;56(7):e46‐53. [DOI: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000237]

Higgins 2011

Higgins JPT, Green S, editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from handbook.cochrane.org. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org.

Holmes 2008

Holmes N, Richter K. Drug testing in the workplace. Canada: Library of Parliament; 2008 February. PRB 07‐51E. Available at: lop.parl.ca/content/lop/researchpublications/prb0751‐e.pdf.

Huestis 2007

Huestis MA, Caplan YH. Introduction: Drugs in the Workplace. Workplace Drug Testing. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press, 2007. [9781420054491]

Kaura 2015

Kaura A. Evidence‐based medicine: reading and writing medical papers. Updated first. China: Elsevier Mosby, 2015.

Knudsen 2004

Knudsen HK, Roman PM, Johnson JA. The management of workplace deviance: Organizational responses to employee drug use. Journal of Drug Issues 2004;34(1):121‐43. [DOI: 10.1177/002204260403400106]

McLean 2015

McLean PD, Schafer ER. Random drug & alcohol testing: commentary on current legal limits and requirements in Canada. www.mathewsdinsdale.com/ohs‐newsletter‐august‐2015/ 17 August 2015.

Normand 1994

Normand J, Lempert RO, O'Brien CP, editor(s). Under the influence? Drugs and the American workforce. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1994. [ISBN‐10: 0‐309‐04885‐0]

NSCEP 1989

National Service Center for Environmental Publications. National Response Team: A Report on the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Response System. nepis.epa.gov March 1989 (accessed 17 November 2017).

Pidd 2016

Pidd K, Kostadinov V, Roche A. Do workplace policies work? An examination of the relationship between alcohol and other drug policies and workers' substance use. International Journal of Drug Policy 2016;28:48‐54. [DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2015.08.017]

Pigott 2013

Pigott T, Shepperd S. Identifying, documenting, and examining heterogeneity in systematic reviews of complex interventions. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2013;66(11):1244‐50. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.06.013]

Pollack 1998

Pollack ES, Franklin GM, Fulton‐Kehoe D, Chowdhury R. Risk of job‐related injury among construction laborers with a diagnosis of substance abuse. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 1998;40:573–7. [DOI: 10.1097/00043764‐199806000‐00011]

Ramsay 2003

Ramsay CR, Matowe L, Grilli R, Grimshaw JM, Thomas RE. Interrupted time series designs in health technology assessment: lessons from two systematic reviews of behavior change strategies. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 2003;19(4):613‐23.

RevMan 2014 [Computer program]

The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). Version 5.3. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014.

Romano 2014

Romano E, Torres‐Saavedra P, Voas RB, Lacey JHH. Drugs and alcohol: their relative crash risk. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs 2014;75(1):56–64. [PUBMED: PMC3893634]

SAMHSA 2016

Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality. Results from the 2015 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: detailed tables. www.samhsa.gov/data/sites/default/files/NSDUH‐DetTabs‐2015/NSDUH‐DetTabs‐2015/NSDUH‐DetTabs‐2015.pdf. Rockville, MD: SAMHSA (Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration), 8 September 2016.

Shipp 2005

Shipp EM, Tortolero SR, Cooper SP, Baumler EG, Weller NF. Substance use and occupational injuries among high school students in south Texas. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse 2005;31(2):253–65. [DOI: 10.1081/ADA‐47931]

Singapore 2014

Singapore Health Sciences Authority. Workplace drug testing. http://www.hsa.gov.sg/content/hsa/en/Applied_Sciences/Toxicology/Overview/Clinical_Forensic_Toxicology/Workplace_Drug_Testing.html (Accessed November 17, 2017)2014.

Statistics Canada 2017a

Statistics Canada. Occupational structure by skill type. noc.esdc.gc.ca/English/NOC/OccupationIndex.aspx?ver=11 (accessed 16 June 2017).

Statistics Canada 2017b

Statistics Canada. North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) 2012. www.statcan.gc.ca/eng/subjects/standard/naics/2012/introduction (accessed 16 June 2017).

Sterne 2016a

Sterne JAC, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, Savović J, Berkman ND, Viswanathan M. ROBINS‐I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non‐randomized studies of interventions. BMJ 2016;355:i4919. [DOI: 10.1136/bmj.i4919]

Sterne 2016b

Sterne JAC, Higgins JPT, Elbers RG, Reeves BC and the development group for ROBINS‐ I. Risk Of Bias In Non‐randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS‐I): detailed guidance. www.riskofbias.info (accessed 26 September 2017).

Stone 1989

Stone DL, Kotch DA. Individuals' attitudes toward organizational drug testing policies and practices. Journal of Applied Psychology 1989;74(3):518‐21. [DOI: 10.1037/0021‐9010.74.3.518]

Swotinsky 2015

Swotinsky RB. The Medical Review Officer's Manual: MROCC's Guide to Drug Testing. Beverly Farms (MA): OEM Press, 2015. [978‐1‐883595‐64‐7]

Taylor 1915

Taylor FW. Principles of Scientific Review. New York (NY): Harper, 1915.

Thomson Reuters 2016

Thomson Reuters. Practical law: Drug/substance abuse testing of employees. https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/3‐541‐0547?transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)&firstPage=true&bhcp=1 (Accessed November 17, 2017) 2016 Nov 1. [[Resource ID 3‐541‐0547]]

Trice 1981

Trice HM, Schonbrunn M. A history of job‐based alcoholism programs: 1900 ‐ 1955. Journal of Drug Issues 1981;11(2):171‐198. [DOI: 10.1177/002204268101100202]

US DOT 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation. What employers need to know about DOT drug and alcohol testing. cms.dot.gov/sites/dot.gov/files/docs/ODAPC_Employer_Guidelines_%20June_1_2015_A.pdf 1 June 2015 (accessed 16 November 2017).

Verstraete 2001

Verstraete AG, Pierce A. Workplace drug testing in Europe. Forensic Science International 2001;121:2‐6. [DOI: 10.1016/S0379‐0738(01)00445‐5]

VicRoads 2015

Victoria State Government. Random drug and alcohol procedure. www.vicroads.vic.gov.au/˜/media/files/documents/utilities/ohs/ohs‐random‐drug‐and‐alcohol‐procedure.pdf (accessed 17 November 2017)2015.

Waehrer 2016

Waehrer GM, Miller TR, Hendrie D, Galvin DM. Employee assistance programs, drug testing, and workplace injury. Journal of Safety Research 2016;57:53‐60. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2016.03.009]

Zwerling 1993

Zwerling C. Current practice and experience in drug and alcohol testing. Bulletin on Narcotics 1993;45(2):155‐196. [PUBMED: 7920540]
Table 1. Logic model

Context:

  1. Company characteristics

    1. Size

    2. Location

    3. Industry

    4. Organizational climate

  2. Job characteristics

    1. Types of positions

    2. Work content

  3. Employee characteristics

    1. Socioeconomic status

    2. Age

    3. Sex or gender

    4. Tobacco smoking

    5. Previous history of addiction or substance use disorder(s)

Inputs

Intervention

Intermediate outcomes

Longer‐Term Outcomes

  1. Identification of need for RDAT

    1. Safety‐sensitive work

    2. Demonstrated drug and/or alcohol problem in the workplace

    3. Desire to reduce workplace injuries and accidents

  2. Resources (supplies, personnel, monetary)

  1. Testing

    1. Number of tests completed

    2. Number of positive test results

    3. Number and percentage of employees tested

    4. Schedule of testing

  2. Service provision

    1. Employee assistance program

    2. Drug and alcohol education

    3. Drug and alcohol treatment

  3. Data collection

    1. Fatal injury rate

    2. Nonfatal injury rate

    3. Noninjury accident rate

    4. Absenteeism

    5. Adverse events associated with tes

  1. Deterrence of use or nonuse related to:

    1. punitive action (discipline, sanction, or discharge penalties);

    2. rehabilitative action (receiving treatment for an addiction or substance use disorder);

    3. receiving accommodations for substance use as a disability

  1. Injuries

    1. Changes in fatal injury rate

    2. Changes in nonfatal injury rate

    3. Changes in noninjury accident rate

  2. Changes in rate of absenteeism

  3. Adverse events associated with RD

RDAT = random drug and alcohol testing
Figuras y tablas -
Table 1. Logic model
Ir a la tabla del protocolo