Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Random drug and alcohol testing for preventing injury in workers

Esta versión no es la más reciente

ver la versión actual 27 diciembre 2020

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012921Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 12 enero 2018see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Protocol
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:

  1. Grupo Cochrane de Salud laboral

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2018 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Charl Els

    Department of Psychiatry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada

  • Tanya D Jackson

    Department of Medicine, Division of Preventive Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada

  • Mathew T Milen

    Department of Medicine, Division of Preventive Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada

  • Diane Kunyk

    Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada

  • Sebastian Straube

    Correspondencia a: Department of Medicine, Division of Preventive Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada

    [email protected]

    [email protected]

Contributions of authors

All authors have contributed to drafting this protocol.

Conceiving the protocol: CE, SS.

Designing the protocol: CE, MM, SS, DK.

Coordinating the protocol: MM.

Designing search strategies: TJ, SS.

Writing the protocol: CE, MM, SS, DK, TJ.

Providing general advice on the protocol: SS, DK, MM.

Securing funding for the protocol: CE, SS, DK.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • No sources of support supplied

External sources

  • Government of Alberta, Canada.

    This study is supported by the Government of Alberta OHS Futures – Research Funding Program (www.work.alberta.ca/ohsfutures).

Declarations of interest

Charl Els: None known.

Mathew T Milen: None known.

Tanya D Jackson: None known.

Diane Kunyk: None known.

Sebastian Straube declares honoraria from Oxford Medical Knowledge (2014) and advisory board fees from Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. (2015). Sebastian Straube is a specialist occupational medicine physician.

Acknowledgements

We thank Jani Ruotsalainen, Managing Editor, and Jos Verbeek, Coordinating Editor from the Cochrane Work Review Group for their help in all stages of the current review. We also thank Editor Consol Serra and external peer referees Moira Sim, Leena Kaila‐Kangas and Birgit Greiner for their comments and Gillian Gummer for copy editing the text.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2020 Dec 27

Random drug and alcohol testing for preventing injury in workers

Review

Charl Els, Tanya D Jackson, Mathew T Milen, Diane Kunyk, Graeme Wyatt, Daniel Sowah, Reidar Hagtvedt, Danika Deibert, Sebastian Straube

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012921.pub2

2018 Jan 12

Random drug and alcohol testing for preventing injury in workers

Protocol

Charl Els, Tanya D Jackson, Mathew T Milen, Diane Kunyk, Sebastian Straube

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012921

Notes

Parts of the methods section and Appendix 1 of this protocol are based on a standard template established by the Cochrane Work Review Group.

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.

Table 1. Logic model

Context:

  1. Company characteristics

    1. Size

    2. Location

    3. Industry

    4. Organizational climate

  2. Job characteristics

    1. Types of positions

    2. Work content

  3. Employee characteristics

    1. Socioeconomic status

    2. Age

    3. Sex or gender

    4. Tobacco smoking

    5. Previous history of addiction or substance use disorder(s)

Inputs

Intervention

Intermediate outcomes

Longer‐Term Outcomes

  1. Identification of need for RDAT

    1. Safety‐sensitive work

    2. Demonstrated drug and/or alcohol problem in the workplace

    3. Desire to reduce workplace injuries and accidents

  2. Resources (supplies, personnel, monetary)

  1. Testing

    1. Number of tests completed

    2. Number of positive test results

    3. Number and percentage of employees tested

    4. Schedule of testing

  2. Service provision

    1. Employee assistance program

    2. Drug and alcohol education

    3. Drug and alcohol treatment

  3. Data collection

    1. Fatal injury rate

    2. Nonfatal injury rate

    3. Noninjury accident rate

    4. Absenteeism

    5. Adverse events associated with tes

  1. Deterrence of use or nonuse related to:

    1. punitive action (discipline, sanction, or discharge penalties);

    2. rehabilitative action (receiving treatment for an addiction or substance use disorder);

    3. receiving accommodations for substance use as a disability

  1. Injuries

    1. Changes in fatal injury rate

    2. Changes in nonfatal injury rate

    3. Changes in noninjury accident rate

  2. Changes in rate of absenteeism

  3. Adverse events associated with RD

RDAT = random drug and alcohol testing
Figuras y tablas -
Table 1. Logic model
Ir a la tabla del protocolo