Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Certolizumab pegol para inducir la remisión de la enfermedad de Crohn

Appendices

Appendix 1. Search strategies

MEDLINE (inception to date)

1. random$.tw.

2. factorial$.tw.

3. (crossover$ or cross over$ or cross‐over$).tw.

4. placebo$.tw.

5. single blind.mp.

6. double blind.mp.

7. triple blind.mp.

8. (singl$ adj blind$).tw.

9. (double$ adj blind$).tw.

10. (tripl$ adj blind$).tw.

11 assign$.tw.

12. allocat$.tw.

13. randomized controlled trial/

14. or/1‐13

15. exp Crohn disease/ or Crohn*.mp.

16. (inflammatory bowel disease* or IBD).mp.

17. 15 or 16

18. exp certolizumab pegol/

19. (CDP870 OR 'CDP 870' OR CDP‐870 OR 'certolizumab pegol' OR certolizumab OR cimzia).mp.

20. 18 or 19

21. 14 and 17 and 20

Embase (inception to date)

1. random$.tw.

2. factorial$.tw.

3. (crossover$ or cross over$ or cross‐over$).tw.

4. placebo$.tw.

5. single blind.mp.

6. double blind.mp.

7. triple blind.mp.

8. (singl$ adj blind$).tw.

9. (double$ adj blind$).tw.

10. (tripl$ adj blind$).tw.

11 assign$.tw.

12. allocat$.tw.

13. crossover procedure/

14. double blind procedure/

15. single blind procedure/

16. triple blind procedure/

17. randomized controlled trial/

18. or/1‐17

19. exp Crohn disease/ or Crohn*.mp.

20. (inflammatory bowel disease* or IBD).mp.

21. 19 or 20

22. exp certolizumab pegol/

23. (CDP870 OR 'CDP 870' OR CDP‐870 OR 'certolizumab pegol' OR certolizumab OR cimzia).mp.

24. 22 or 23

25. 18 and 21 and 24

CENTRAL (inception to date)

#1 MeSH descriptor: [Inflammatory bowel diseases] explode all trees

#2 MeSH descriptor: [Crohn Disease] explode all trees

#3 Crohn

#4 #1 or #2 or #3

#5 MeSH descriptor: [Certolizumab pegol] explode all trees

#6 CDP870 OR 'CDP 870' OR CDP‐870 OR 'certolizumab pegol' OR certolizumab OR cimzia

#7 #5 or #6

#8 #4 and #7

Cochrane IBD Group Specialized Register (inception to date)

#1 (CDP870 OR 'CDP 870' OR CDP‐870 OR 'certolizumab pegol' OR certolizumab OR cimzia).ti.

#2 Crohn.ti.

#3 1 and 2

Study flow diagram.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Study flow diagram.

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 3

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Certolizumab pegol versus placebo, outcome: 1.1 Clinical remission at week 8.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 4

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Certolizumab pegol versus placebo, outcome: 1.1 Clinical remission at week 8.

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Certolizumab pegol versus placebo, outcome: 1.2 Clinical response at week 8.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 5

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Certolizumab pegol versus placebo, outcome: 1.2 Clinical response at week 8.

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Certolizumab pegol versus placebo, outcome: 1.6 Serious adverse events.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 6

Forest plot of comparison: 1 Certolizumab pegol versus placebo, outcome: 1.6 Serious adverse events.

Comparison 1 Certolizumab pegol versus placebo, Outcome 1 Clinical remission at week 8.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Certolizumab pegol versus placebo, Outcome 1 Clinical remission at week 8.

Comparison 1 Certolizumab pegol versus placebo, Outcome 2 Clinical response at week 8.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Certolizumab pegol versus placebo, Outcome 2 Clinical response at week 8.

Comparison 1 Certolizumab pegol versus placebo, Outcome 3 CRP at week 8 (log‐scales of geometric mean CRP ratio between baseline and week 8).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Certolizumab pegol versus placebo, Outcome 3 CRP at week 8 (log‐scales of geometric mean CRP ratio between baseline and week 8).

Comparison 1 Certolizumab pegol versus placebo, Outcome 4 IBDQ total score at week 8 (mean change from baseline).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Certolizumab pegol versus placebo, Outcome 4 IBDQ total score at week 8 (mean change from baseline).

Comparison 1 Certolizumab pegol versus placebo, Outcome 5 Adverse events.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 Certolizumab pegol versus placebo, Outcome 5 Adverse events.

Comparison 1 Certolizumab pegol versus placebo, Outcome 6 Serious adverse events.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 Certolizumab pegol versus placebo, Outcome 6 Serious adverse events.

Comparison 1 Certolizumab pegol versus placebo, Outcome 7 Withdrawals due to adverse events.
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.7

Comparison 1 Certolizumab pegol versus placebo, Outcome 7 Withdrawals due to adverse events.

Comparison 1 Certolizumab pegol versus placebo, Outcome 8 Clinical remission at week 8 (Subgroup analysis based on CZP doses).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.8

Comparison 1 Certolizumab pegol versus placebo, Outcome 8 Clinical remission at week 8 (Subgroup analysis based on CZP doses).

Comparison 1 Certolizumab pegol versus placebo, Outcome 9 Clinical remission at week 8 (Subgroup analysis of no previous treatment with TNF‐α inhibitors).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.9

Comparison 1 Certolizumab pegol versus placebo, Outcome 9 Clinical remission at week 8 (Subgroup analysis of no previous treatment with TNF‐α inhibitors).

Comparison 1 Certolizumab pegol versus placebo, Outcome 10 Clinical remission at week 8 (Subgroup analysis of CRP levels at baseline).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.10

Comparison 1 Certolizumab pegol versus placebo, Outcome 10 Clinical remission at week 8 (Subgroup analysis of CRP levels at baseline).

Comparison 1 Certolizumab pegol versus placebo, Outcome 11 Clinical remission at week 8 (Sensitivity analysis of excluding studies with high risk of bias).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.11

Comparison 1 Certolizumab pegol versus placebo, Outcome 11 Clinical remission at week 8 (Sensitivity analysis of excluding studies with high risk of bias).

Comparison 1 Certolizumab pegol versus placebo, Outcome 12 Clinical remission at week 8 (sensitivity analysis of using available case data).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.12

Comparison 1 Certolizumab pegol versus placebo, Outcome 12 Clinical remission at week 8 (sensitivity analysis of using available case data).

Comparison 1 Certolizumab pegol versus placebo, Outcome 13 Clinical remission at week 8 (Sensitivity analysis of studies with the approval dosing regimen).
Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.13

Comparison 1 Certolizumab pegol versus placebo, Outcome 13 Clinical remission at week 8 (Sensitivity analysis of studies with the approval dosing regimen).

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Certolizumab pegol compared to placebo for induction of remission in Crohn's disease

Certolizumab pegol compared to placebo for induction of remission in Crohn's disease

Patient or population: Patients with active Crohn's disease

Settings: Outpatient

Intervention: Certolizumab pegol

Comparison: Placebo

Outcomes

Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No of Participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Assumed risk

Corresponding risk

Control

Certolizummab pegol

Clinical remission

Follow‐up: 8 weeks

198 per 1000

270 per 1000

(220 to 329)

RR 1.36

(1.11 to 1.66)

1485
(4 studies)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
MODERATE1

Certolizumab pegol was shown to be superior to placebo regarding clinical remission at week 8

Clinical remission was defined as a CDAI < 150

Clinical response

Follow‐up: 8 weeks

309 per 1000

399 per 1000

(337 to 473)

RR 1.29

(1.09 to 1.53)

1485

(4 studies)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
MODERATE1

Clinical response was defined as CDAI reduction ≥ 100 from baseline

Serious adverse events

Follow‐up: 8 weeks

62 per 1000

83 per 1000

(57 to 121)

RR 1.35

(0.93 to 1.97)

1485

(4 studies)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
MODERATE2

Reported serious adverse events included worsening Crohn's disease, infections, and malignancy

*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk Ratio; CDAI: Crohn's disease activity index

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

1 Downgraded one level due to high risk of bias in one study in the pooled analysis

2 Downgraded one level due to imprecision (113 events)

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings for the main comparison. Certolizumab pegol compared to placebo for induction of remission in Crohn's disease
Comparison 1. Certolizumab pegol versus placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Clinical remission at week 8 Show forest plot

4

1485

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.36 [1.11, 1.66]

2 Clinical response at week 8 Show forest plot

4

1485

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.29 [1.09, 1.53]

3 CRP at week 8 (log‐scales of geometric mean CRP ratio between baseline and week 8) Show forest plot

4

1271

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.37 [‐0.49, ‐0.24]

4 IBDQ total score at week 8 (mean change from baseline) Show forest plot

4

1315

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

2.12 [‐1.27, 5.50]

5 Adverse events Show forest plot

4

1485

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.03 [0.97, 1.10]

6 Serious adverse events Show forest plot

4

1485

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.35 [0.93, 1.97]

7 Withdrawals due to adverse events Show forest plot

4

1485

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.57, 1.78]

8 Clinical remission at week 8 (Subgroup analysis based on CZP doses) Show forest plot

4

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

8.1 Certolizumab pegol 100mg

1

99

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

2.48 [0.81, 7.58]

8.2 Certolizumab pegol 200mg

2

142

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.84 [0.75, 4.50]

8.3 Certolizumab pegol 400mg

4

1244

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.30 [1.06, 1.60]

9 Clinical remission at week 8 (Subgroup analysis of no previous treatment with TNF‐α inhibitors) Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

10 Clinical remission at week 8 (Subgroup analysis of CRP levels at baseline) Show forest plot

4

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

10.1 CRP ≥ 10 mg/L

4

702

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.59 [1.17, 2.16]

10.2 CRP < 10 mg/L

3

762

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.15 [0.88, 1.50]

11 Clinical remission at week 8 (Sensitivity analysis of excluding studies with high risk of bias) Show forest plot

3

1193

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.29 [1.05, 1.59]

12 Clinical remission at week 8 (sensitivity analysis of using available case data) Show forest plot

4

1463

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.36 [1.11, 1.67]

13 Clinical remission at week 8 (Sensitivity analysis of studies with the approval dosing regimen) Show forest plot

3

1147

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.28 [1.03, 1.57]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Certolizumab pegol versus placebo