Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Tourniquet use for knee replacement surgery

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012874Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 21 noviembre 2017see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Protocol
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Salud musculoesquelética

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2017 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Imran Ahmed

    Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK

  • Amit Chawla

    Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK

  • Martin Underwood

    Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK

  • Andrew J Price

    Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

  • Andrew Metcalfe

    Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK

  • Charles Hutchinson

    Health Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK

  • Jane Warwick

    Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK

  • Kate Seers

    Warwick Medical School, The University of Warwick, Coventry, UK

  • Helen Parsons

    Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK

  • Peter DH Wall

    Correspondencia a: Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK

    [email protected]

    [email protected]

Contributions of authors

All authors contributed to writing of the protocol and approval of final draft.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • No sources of support supplied

External sources

  • National Institute of Health Research, UK.

    Post‐Doctoral Fellowship Training Programme: PDF‐2015‐08‐108

Declarations of interest

Two of the review authors (AM and AP) are Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeons who routinely undertake independent TKR surgery.
Both AM and AP currently routinely perform TKR surgery with a tourniquet unless their patients express a preference or there are contraindications to using a tourniquet.

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge the following members of the Safety and Feasibility Evaluation of Knee Replacement Surgery (SAFE‐TKR) Study Group: Ms Bushra Rehman, Ms Jaclyn Brown, Mr James Smith, Mrs Christine Goulden, Mrs Jan Dixox, Dr Nele Demeyere and Professor JM Wilkinson.

The review forms part of a larger project (SAFE‐TKR Study) and is independent‐research‐funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) under a Post‐Doctoral Fellowship Award (PDF‐2015‐08‐108). The study is sponsored by the University of Warwick. The study funder and sponsor had no role in the study design; the collection, analysis, or interpretation of data; the writing of the report; or the decision to submit for publication. The researchers are independent and the views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health.

We would like to acknowledge the contribution of Andrew Sprowson, who died unexpectedly on 13 March 2015. Andrew was one of the main collaborators on this project and had made a significant contribution to the study design and in securing research funding. Andrew was an academic orthopaedic surgeon who was dedicated to improving evidence‐based care in his field. He was an exceptionally enthusiastic researcher and surgeon and is greatly missed by his academic and clinical colleagues.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2020 Dec 08

Tourniquet use for knee replacement surgery

Review

Imran Ahmed, Amit Chawla, Martin Underwood, Andrew J Price, Andrew Metcalfe, Charles Hutchinson, Jane Warwick, Kate Seers, Helen Parsons, Peter DH Wall

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012874.pub2

2017 Nov 21

Tourniquet use for knee replacement surgery

Protocol

Imran Ahmed, Amit Chawla, Martin Underwood, Andrew J Price, Andrew Metcalfe, Charles Hutchinson, Jane Warwick, Kate Seers, Helen Parsons, Peter DH Wall

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012874

Keywords

MeSH

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.