Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Subconjunctival draining minimally‐invasive glaucoma devices for medically uncontrolled glaucoma

Esta versión no es la más reciente

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012742Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 03 agosto 2017see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Protocol
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Salud ocular y de la visión

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2017 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Anthony J King

    Correspondencia a: Ophthalmology, Nottingham University Hospital, Nottingham, UK

    [email protected]

    [email protected]

  • Kuang Hu

    Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

  • Eleni Nikita

    Glaucoma Service, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

  • Caroline A Mulvaney

    Lancaster Health Hub, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK

  • Augusto Azuara‐Blanco

    Centre for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK

  • Richard Stead

    Ophthalmology, Nottingham University Hospital, Nottingham, UK

Contributions of authors

Anthony King and Eleni Nikita wrote the protocol. All authors reviewed and approved the protocol.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • No sources of support supplied

External sources

  • National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), UK.

    • Richard Wormald, Co‐ordinating Editor for Cochrane Eyes and Vision (CEV) acknowledges financial support for his CEV research sessions from the Department of Health through the award made by the National Institute for Health Research to Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology for a Specialist Biomedical Research Centre for Ophthalmology.

    • This protocol was supported by the National Institute for Health Research, via Cochrane Infrastructure funding to the CEV UK editorial base.

    The views and opinions expressed therein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Systematic Reviews Programme, NIHR, NHS or the Department of Health.

Declarations of interest

Anthony J King has undertaken invited lecture for Allergan on trabeculectomy surgery and role of phasing in glaucoma.
Kuang Hu performs this and other forms of minimally‐invasive glaucoma surgery. He has lectured on 'Constructing clinical trials for MIGS ‐ the lack of evidence and what to do about it' at the Moorfields International Glaucoma Symposium 2016, sponsored by Laboratoires Thea, which is contributing an educational grant to Moorfields Eye Hospital.
Eleni Nikita: None known
Caroline A Mulvaney: None known
Augusto Azuara‐Blanco has done unpaid consultancy work for Bayer (2015 and 2016) as a member of an independent panel judging the quality of care of NHS Departments of Ophthalmology. Bayer provided funds to Queen's University Belfast.
Richard Stead: None known

Acknowledgements

Cochrane Eyes and Vision (CEV) will create and execute the electronic search strategies. We thank Nitin Anand and Jennifer Evans for their comments on the published protocol that forms the template for this one (Hu 2016) and Anupa Shah for assisting with the review process.

We thank the members of the MIGS Consortium for their input in this protocol.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2018 Dec 16

Subconjunctival draining minimally‐invasive glaucoma devices for medically uncontrolled glaucoma

Review

Anthony J King, Anupa Shah, Eleni Nikita, Kuang Hu, Caroline A Mulvaney, Richard Stead, Augusto Azuara‐Blanco

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012742.pub2

2017 Aug 03

Subconjunctival draining minimally‐invasive glaucoma devices for medically uncontrolled glaucoma

Protocol

Anthony J King, Kuang Hu, Eleni Nikita, Caroline A Mulvaney, Augusto Azuara‐Blanco, Richard Stead

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012742

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.