Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Dispositivos de drenaje subconjuntival mínimamente invasivos para el glaucoma sin control clínico

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012742.pub2Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 16 diciembre 2018see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Salud ocular y de la visión

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2018 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Anthony J King

    Correspondencia a: Ophthalmology, Nottingham University Hospital, Nottingham, UK

    [email protected]

    [email protected]

  • Anupa Shah

    Cochrane Eyes and Vision, ICEH, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK

  • Eleni Nikita

    Glaucoma Service, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

  • Kuang Hu

    Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

  • Caroline A Mulvaney

    School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK

  • Richard Stead

    Ophthalmology, Nottingham University Hospital, Nottingham, UK

  • Augusto Azuara‐Blanco

    Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK

Contributions of authors

Protocol
AK and EN wrote the protocol.
All authors reviewed and approved the protocol.

Review
AS, EN, and RS screened the search results.
RS extracted the data for the ongoing study and AS checked data.
AS and AK wrote the review.
AAZ, CAM, EN, KH and RS commented on the draft.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • No sources of support supplied

External sources

  • National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), UK.

    • Richard Wormald, Co‐ordinating Editor for Cochrane Eyes and Vision (CEV) acknowledges financial support for his CEV research sessions from the Department of Health through the award made by the NIHR to Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology for a Specialist Biomedical Research Centre for Ophthalmology.

    • This review was supported by the NIHR, via Cochrane Infrastructure funding to the CEV UK editorial base.

    The views and opinions expressed therein are those of the review authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Systematic Reviews Programme, NIHR, National Health Service, or the Department of Health.

Declarations of interest

Anthony J King undertook an invited lecture for Allergan on trabeculectomy surgery and role of phasing in glaucoma.
Anupa Shah: none known.
Eleni Nikita: none known.
Kuang Hu performs this and other forms of minimally‐invasive glaucoma surgery. He lectured on "Constructing clinical trials for MIGS ‐ the lack of evidence and what to do about it" at the Moorfields International Glaucoma Symposium 2016, sponsored by Laboratoires Thea, which is contributing an educational grant to Moorfields Eye Hospital.
Caroline A Mulvaney: none known.
Richard Stead: none known.
Augusto Azuara‐Blanco has done unpaid consultancy work for Bayer (2015 and 2016) as a member of an independent panel judging the quality of care of NHS Departments of Ophthalmology. Bayer provided funds to Queen's University Belfast.

Acknowledgements

Cochrane Eyes and Vision (CEV) will created and executed the electronic search strategies. We thank Nitin Anand and Jennifer Evans for their comments on the published protocol that forms the template for this one (Hu 2016) and on the review itself.

We thank the members of the MIGS Consortium for their input in this review.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2018 Dec 16

Subconjunctival draining minimally‐invasive glaucoma devices for medically uncontrolled glaucoma

Review

Anthony J King, Anupa Shah, Eleni Nikita, Kuang Hu, Caroline A Mulvaney, Richard Stead, Augusto Azuara‐Blanco

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012742.pub2

2017 Aug 03

Subconjunctival draining minimally‐invasive glaucoma devices for medically uncontrolled glaucoma

Protocol

Anthony J King, Kuang Hu, Eleni Nikita, Caroline A Mulvaney, Augusto Azuara‐Blanco, Richard Stead

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012742

Differences between protocol and review

  • The follow‐up times for the outcomes were decided after the protocol was published.

  • An additional co‐author, A Shah joined the review team.

  • The protocol included combination therapy with phacoemulsification as a separate comparison and also for subgroup analysis. After discussion within the review team and MIGS Consortium, we opted to include it as a separate comparison as this is likely to be a different indication.

Keywords

MeSH

Medical Subject Headings Check Words

Humans;

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.

Study flow diagram.
Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Study flow diagram.