Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Banding ligation versus no intervention for primary prevention in adults with oesophageal varices

Esta versión no es la más reciente

ver la versión actual 20 junio 2019

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012673Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 29 mayo 2017see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Protocol
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:

  1. Grupo Cochrane de Hepatobiliar

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2017 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Charles Wei Kit Yong

    UCL Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, Division of Medicine, Royal Free Campus, University College London, London, UK

  • Sonam Vadera

    UCL Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, Division of Medicine, Royal Free Campus, University College London, London, UK

  • Marsha Y Morgan

    UCL Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, Division of Medicine, Royal Free Campus, University College London, London, UK

  • Lise Lotte Gluud

    Correspondencia a: Gastrounit, Medical Division, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark

    [email protected]

Contributions of authors

LLG drafted the protocol. All authors revised the protocol and approved of the final version.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • None, Other.

External sources

  • None, Other.

Declarations of interest

LLG: participated in clinical trials funded by Merck, Abbvie, and Norgine (money paid to institution).
MYM, CWKY, SV: no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgements

Thank you to Sarah Klingenberg who prepared the electronic search strategy.

Cochrane Review Group funding acknowledgement: The Danish State is the largest single funder of The Cochrane Hepato‐Biliary Group through its investment in The Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark. Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this review are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Danish State or The Copenhagen Trial Unit.

Peer Reviewers: Chavdar Pavlov, Russia; Arturo J Martí‐Carvajal, Venezuela.
Contact Editor: Christian Gluud, Denmark.
Sign‐off Editor: Christian Gluud, Denmark.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2019 Jun 20

Band ligation versus no intervention for primary prevention of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in adults with cirrhosis and oesophageal varices

Review

Sonam Vadera, Charles Wei Kit Yong, Lise Lotte Gluud, Marsha Y Morgan

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012673.pub2

2017 May 29

Banding ligation versus no intervention for primary prevention in adults with oesophageal varices

Protocol

Charles Wei Kit Yong, Sonam Vadera, Marsha Y Morgan, Lise Lotte Gluud

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012673

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.