Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Trifocal intraocular lenses versus bifocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction

Esta versión no es la más reciente

ver la versión actual 27 enero 2023

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012648Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 03 mayo 2017see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Protocol
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:

  1. Grupo Cochrane de Salud ocular y de la visión

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2017 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Diego Zamora‐De la Cruz

    Correspondencia a: Anterior Segment Department, Instituto de Oftalmología Fundación Conde de Valenciana, Mexico City, Mexico

    [email protected]

    [email protected]

  • Marisol Garzón

    Anterior Segment Department, Instituto de Oftalmología Fundación Conde de Valenciana, Mexico City, Mexico

  • Daniela Pulido‐London

    Anterior Segment Department, Instituto de Oftalmología Fundación Conde de Valenciana, Mexico City, Mexico

  • Aida Jimenez‐Corona

    Ocular Epidemiology and Visual Sciences Department, Instituto de Oftalmología Fundación Conde de Valenciana, Mexico City, Mexico

  • Karla Zúñiga‐Posselt

    Instituto de Oftalmología Fundación Conde de Valenciana, Mexico City, Mexico

  • John Bartlett

    Jules Stein Eye Institute, UCLA, Los Angeles, USA

  • Mario Gutierrez

    Retina and Vitreous Department, Instituto de Oftalmología Fundación Conde de Valenciana, Mexico City, Mexico

  • Eduardo Chavez‐Mondragón

    Anterior Segment Department, Instituto de Oftalmología Fundación Conde de Valenciana, Mexico City, Mexico

Contributions of authors

Diego Zamora‐De la Cruz: developed the protocol, final approval of manuscript.
Marisol Garzón: developed the protocol, final approval of manuscript.
Daniela Pulido‐London: critical review of the clinical sections, final approval of manuscript.
Aida Jimenez‐Corona: critical review of the statistical sections, final approval of manuscript.
Karla Zúñiga‐Posselt: critical review of the clinical sections, final approval of manuscript.
John Bartlett: critical review of the clinical sections, final approval of manuscript.
Mario Gutierrez: critical review of the clinical sections, final approval of manuscript.
Eduardo Chavez‐Mondragón: critical review of the clinical sections, final approval of manuscript.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • No sources of support supplied

External sources

  • Methodological and editorial support provided by the Cochrane Eyes and Vision US Project, supported by grant 1 U01 EY020522, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, USA.

  • National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), UK.

    • Richard Wormald, Co‐ordinating Editor for Cochrane Eyes and Vision (CEV) acknowledges financial support for his CEV research sessions from the Department of Health through the award made by the National Institute for Health Research to Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology for a Specialist Biomedical Research Centre for Ophthalmology.

    • The NIHR also funds the CEV Editorial Base in London.

    The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR, NHS, or the Department of Health.

Declarations of interest

Diego Zamora‐De la Cruz: none known.
Marisol Garzón: none known.
Daniela Pulido‐London: none known.
Aida Jimenez‐Corona: none known.
Karla Zúñiga‐Posselt: none known.
John Bartlett: none known.
Mario Gutierrez: none known.
Eduardo Chavez‐Mondragón: none known.

Acknowledgements

Lori Rosman, Cochrane Eyes and Vision (CEV) Informationist, created and will execute the electronic search strategies. We thank Elizabeth Clearfield, Barbara Hawkins, José Luis Rincon, and the CEV editorial team for their comments on the protocol.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2023 Jan 27

Trifocal intraocular lenses versus bifocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction among participants with presbyopia

Review

Diego Zamora-de La Cruz, John Bartlett, Mario Gutierrez, Sueko M Ng

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012648.pub3

2020 Jun 18

Trifocal intraocular lenses versus bifocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction among participants with presbyopia

Review

Diego Zamora-de La Cruz, Karla Zúñiga-Posselt, John Bartlett, Mario Gutierrez, Samuel A Abariga

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012648.pub2

2017 May 03

Trifocal intraocular lenses versus bifocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction

Protocol

Diego Zamora‐De la Cruz, Marisol Garzón, Daniela Pulido‐London, Aida Jimenez‐Corona, Karla Zúñiga‐Posselt, John Bartlett, Mario Gutierrez, Eduardo Chavez‐Mondragón

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012648

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.